BREGA PETROLEUM

MARKETING COMPANY
‫شركة البريقة‬
(BPMC) ‫لتسويق للنفط‬

TENDER NO. …

Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

ALKHUMS- LIBYA

PROPOSAL
Reference No. TAK – BMC - xxx

PART 1
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

September 2018
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 2 of 29

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 4
1.1 AKAKUS COMPANY PROFILE ............................................................................................ 4
2. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM ........................................................................................ 4
2.3 METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH ......................................................................................... 4
2.3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 4
2.3.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................. 5
2.4 EIA PROCESS ................................................................................................................. 6
2.4.1 EIA Scope ............................................................................................................. 6
2.4.2 EIA Procedure ....................................................................................................... 6
2.4.3 Proposed Development ......................................................................................... 7
2.4.4 Local Environment................................................................................................. 7
2.4.5 Environmental Legislation ..................................................................................... 7
2.4.6 Impact Identification and Prediction ....................................................................... 7
2.4.7 Significance of Impacts ......................................................................................... 7
2.4.8 Impact Mitigation ................................................................................................... 7
2.4.9 Environmental Assessment Report ....................................................................... 7
2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE SURVEY - SCOPE OF WORK. ...................................... 8
2.5.1 BASELINE SURVEY OBJECTIVES ...................................................................... 8
2.5.2 BASELINE SURVEY SPECIFICATION ................................................................. 8
2.5.3 EVALUATION OF SURVEY DATA ........................................................................ 9
2.5.4 Soil Sampling ........................................................................................................ 9
2.5.5 Water Sampling ..................................................................................................... 9
2.5.6 Noise Measurement .............................................................................................. 9
2.5.7 Air Quality ............................................................................................................. 9
2.5.8 Baseline Survey Report (EBS) ............................................................................ 10
2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................ 10
2.6.1 EMP Report......................................................................................................... 10
2.7 INFORMATION REQUIRED........................................................................................ 10
3. PROJECT MANAGMENT ................................................................................................. 11
3.1 PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN ..................................................................................... 11
3.2 DOCUMENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL ..................................................................... 11
3.3 PROJECT SCHEDULE ................................................................................................. 11
3.4 COMMUNICATIONS AND REPORTING ..................................................................... 12
3.5 COMPOSITION AND RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................... 12
4. PREPARATION OF EBS/EIA REPORTS ......................................................................... 13
5. TIME SCHEDULE ............................................................................................................. 13
6. QHSE MANGMENT SYSTEM ........................................................................................... 13
6.1 TLEC QHSE ................................................................................................................ 13
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 3 of 29

6.2 AKAKUS QHSE .......................................................................................................... 14

7. DELIVERABLES ............................................................................................................... 14
8. MILESTONE PAYMENT ................................................................................................... 14
9. REFREBCED DOCUMENTS AND ATTACHMENTS ........................................................ 14
9.1 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................. 14
9.2 ATTACHMENTS ............................................................................................................. 14
9.2.1 QHSE Attachments ............................................................................................. 15
9.2.2 Air monitoring Equipment Specification Attachment ............................................ 23
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 4 of 29

1. INTRODUCTION
This proposal is prepared as a response to Brega Petroleum Marketing Company (BPMC)
request date 22/04/2018 to conduct EBS/EIA. TLEC and its subcontractor Akakus is pleased to
present a Technical proposal based on the Prepared SOW by TLEC
(TLEC_QHSE_SOW_18_002_Rev_A1) to conduct a study of

The EIA process will be based on a risk-based approach to avoid and minimize potential environmental
impacts from its activities. The EIA process is undertaken to identify environmental and socioeconomic
consequences early in the project planning and design process to facilitate the prevention, minimization,
and mitigation of potential adverse impacts. The EIA will be compliant with national requirements and
provide a formal mechanism to improve decision-making processes involving environmental issues. Also
an EMP as part of the environmental management associated with EIA processes specific to the potential
mitigation measures and implementation of onshore and offshore oil and gas activities.

EBS, EIA and EMP will be prepared for the new Brega Al-Khmus Terminal at Alkhmus- Libya, which
comprises the gasoline, HGO, kerosene, aviation gasoline, LPG, and jet A1 storage facilities along with
associated utilities and product metering equipment. The study will also cover all facilities in the project.

The EIA will be prepared by gathering, evaluating and reporting information of potential risks and impacts of
these activities and recommend mitigation measures for avoiding harm to the environment, in compliance with
the Libyan and international environmental requirements. Moreover, integrate these mitigation measures with
the project design process and environmental management plan to capture anticipated benefits.

1.1 Akakus Company Profile

Akakus has complete more than 150 Environmental studies both in onshore & offshore
operations. Please refer to the Attached profile in this Proposal.

2. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM

2.3 Methodological approach

2.3.1 Introduction
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) provides an evaluation of potential risks and impacts
associated with project activities. The objective of the EIA process is to ensure that, during the
planning phase, full account is taken of the environmental risks and potential impacts of proposed
project activities and operations, and that technological and procedural controls are applied with the
aim of eliminating or mitigating environmental damage.

The following illustrates the methodology to be applied by in preparing an EIA report for submission
to the Libyan Environment General Authority (EGA), and in developing project mitigation, control
and environmental protection measures.

The EIA is essentially a technique for illustration together, in a systematic way, expert qualitative, and
where possible, quantitative assessment of a project as environmental effects. It presents the results in
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 5 of 29

such a way that the public and public interest groups can properly evaluate by both the proponent and
the relevant approval body, and of increasing importance, the importance of the predicted effects, and
the scope for mitigation.

A carefully prepared assessment will:

• Identify the immediate, long term and residual impacts.

• Avoid delays and design changes due to unforeseen environmental issues.
• Avoid costs associated with delays or forced design changes and later remedial measures.
• Avoid adverse publicity.
• Prevent future liability.

As an integral part of the EIA process, a site-specific Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS) is
required at the proposed project locations. The EBS should be undertaken before any operations or
activities commence to provide a baseline description of environmental conditions against which
interactions of the project with the environment can be assessed. The baseline also provides a
foundation for subsequent monitoring programs.

2.3.2 Objectives
The main objectives of an Environmental Impact Assessment are to:

• Identify statutory regulations that will affect the project or activity and any internal standards,
codes and procedures that apply. Detail all relevant Local, Regional, National and International
legislation as well as corporate policies as they affect all environmental aspects of the proposed
project. Detail the policy, legal, and administrative framework within which the EIA carried
out. This shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the EIA process, wastewater
discharges, air emissions, solid waste disposal, noise, smell, vibration, health and safety, and
emergency situations.
• Identify sensitive components of the existing environment (physical and biological) and provide
a basic environmental risk assessment. Review and document the existing knowledge and site-
specific baseline state (through an EBS of the project location), and define additional parameters
to be investigated in order to describe the pre-project environment. Emphasis will be put on the
environmental components that are of particular significance to the proposed activities. All
media potentially affected shall be considered - air, land and water. The scope of work for the
baseline survey is defined below.
• Identify and briefly describe all existing infrastructure, commercial, industrial, urban and rural,
their facilities, activities and operations in the area.
• Establish, qualitatively and where possible quantitatively, relationships between the proposed
project (facilities, activities, operations, infrastructure, etc.) and probable environmental effects.
• Determine the type, nature and importance of the predicted effects (positive, negative and
cumulative) on biological, hydrological and geological features of the environment, as well as
on ambient air.
• Identify the kinds and magnitudes of adverse impacts which:
(i) Constitute residual impacts; and
(ii) have the potential to harm or damage the environment.
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 6 of 29

The significance of impacts should be determined, among other things by:

- The number of inhabitants to be affected by the impacts;

- The number of other environmental components affected by the impacts;
- The size and spread of the impacts;
- The duration of the impacts;
- The intensity of the impacts;
- The cumulative characteristics of the impacts, and
- Reversible or irreversible impacts.

• Assist project and operational planning by identifying in location, construction, processes and
procedures etc. where and how adverse environmental interactions or effects may occur, and
what mitigation measures need to be included early in the process for the amelioration of such
interactions or effects.
• Recommend reasonable measures to the development process, systems, plans, or management
procedures which eliminate, minimize, mitigate or avoid adverse environmental impacts
resulting from the project.
• Identify technological, materials, products or procedural and practice constraints and controls to
ensure proper attention to environmental protection.
• Describe potential environmentally damaging incidents .
• Ensure that adequate environmental protection measures are applied and followed for both
normal and abnormal conditions during preparations, operations and decommissioning, and that
all controls are communicated and applied to the work force and to contractors.
• Recommend the environmental management program for the development activity including
legislative compliance, waste management, restoration, emergency response, statutory and
internal monitoring requirements, and to include allowance for continual improvement in
environmental performance.

2.4 EIA Process

2.4.1 EIA Scope

Libyan Law No. 15 of 2003 on Environmental Protection requires an environmental assessment and
permit for all activities which may cause pollution. The structure and format of an EIA will follow the
NOC guidelines and the EGA requirements

The scope shall also identify design or operating standards which the project must address to be
environmentally acceptable. This will include, for example, operating practices aimed at mitigating
environmental impacts, sewerage effluent controls, waste management standards, and occupational
health and safety requirements.
The scope clearly defines the geographical area to be assessed considering natural physical boundaries,
ecosystem and land use boundaries, and zone of disturbance that is likely to be produced by the
activities. Any concern related to timing of the activities should also be considered.

2.4.2 EIA Procedure

The EIA process proposed in this study is essentially a technique for drawing together, in a systematic
way, an expert qualitative assessment of the project's environmental effects. It will present the results
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 7 of 29

in such a way that both Taknia and the EGA can properly evaluate the importance of the predicted
effects and the scope for mitigation.

2.4.3 Proposed Development

Sufficient information on the proposed development programme will be included, covering all stages
of the project activities from mobilization, through operations, to completion. Information needed
includes:
• General project characteristics e.g. hazardous materials, chemical use plan, etc.
• Description of main operations,
• Estimates by type, preferably quantity, of all wastes, emissions and discharges.

A detailed information required from BPMC is included in Section 2.7 below.

2.4.4 Local Environment

The importance and vulnerability of the components of the local environment that are likely to be
affected by the project shall be described.

2.4.5 Environmental Legislation

Relevant environmental legislation and regulations will be identified. Constraints may be imposed on
waste disposal, emissions and discharges, restoration etc.

2.4.6 Impact Identification and Prediction

The likely effects of the project on the environment will be identified and described based on the
project description. Direct, indirect, short, medium and long term, positive and negative effects will be
covered.

2.4.7 Significance of Impacts

Once the impacts have been identified and their scale assessed then the significance of the effects on
the environment and the local populations can be determined. This usually involves reference to an
accepted criteria or standard for environmental quality, health, nuisance, or acceptability in a more
general way. For impacts such as noise and some atmospheric emissions acceptable standards are
widely recognized. For other impacts, such as environmental quality, the assessment will be totally
subjective and acceptability related to the best industry practice, such as that specified in
“Environmental Management in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production. UNEP Technical Report
37, 1997.ISBN 92-807-1639-5”, rather than to any scientific analysis.

2.4.8 Impact Mitigation

The impact and assessment of its significance will usually indicate the need for measures to mitigate
harmful effects. Such measures may involve preparation of policies and procedures; alternative
technologies; alternative sites; use of alternative chemicals or materials; waste recovery, contingency
planning and restoration.

2.4.9 Environmental Assessment Report

The assessment process and the information obtained will be detailed in a written report. The report
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 8 of 29

will be developed as a standalone document.

2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE SURVEY - SCOPE OF WORK.

2.5.1 BASELINE SURVEY OBJECTIVES

An environmental baseline survey should be undertaken before any operations or activities commence
to provide a baseline description of environmental conditions against which interactions of the project
activities with the environment can be assessed. The baseline also provides a foundation for
subsequent monitoring programs.
The baseline survey will contain detailed biological/physical information on the existing environment,
including inventories of the flora, fauna and the hydrological characteristics, and the vulnerability of
the environment to change.
Depending on the locality, ecosystems and habitats and potential environmental sensitivity, the
objectives of baseline surveys can vary but are usually covered by the following:
• Establish a series of environmental baseline representing biological and physical conditions in key
areas prior to the commencement of operations, or when significant changes are made.
• As a basis for the development of an environmental impact assessment. The scope of work for the
EIA is defined above.
• To select appropriate environmental control technology.
• As a basis for comparison with subsequent data gathered through environmental monitoring
programs.
• To highlight those areas that would be most sensitive to a shift in the natural balance (i.e. to
identify indicators as an early warning of any adverse environmental impact).
• As a basis for determining sensitivities in emergency response planning.
• As a reference point to evaluate claims in cases of unforeseen impact.
The baseline survey should be implemented at the planning phase of any activity, prior to the
commencement of any operations, or when significant change in operations, procedures or
organization occurs.

2.5.2 BASELINE SURVEY SPECIFICATION

The parameters requiring examination will depend on the habitats and hydrological resources in the
vicinity of the proposed development sites, and to a large extent on the nature and scale of the project
activity.
Resources and habitats that warrant priority consideration in the environmental assessment are those
that are:
• Vulnerable to disturbance.
• Vulnerable to contamination by emissions, discharges, effluents and solid wastes.
• Difficult to restore, stabilize or revegetate.
• Culturally or economically significant.
• Most productive and potentially critical to species survival.
• Inhabited or close to communities.
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 9 of 29

• Protected.
• Rare or unique.

The baseline survey will identify and list the resources and habitats that are likely to be affected by the
activity at the proposed development sites, and provide useful information on which to base
recommendations concerning:
• Site lay-out
• Chemical handling
• Waste disposal
• Noise control
• Decommissioning and reinstatement

The information from a baseline survey will be used as a basis for developing the final Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) report.

2.5.3 EVALUATION OF SURVEY DATA

Data will be evaluated to establish its importance on a local and, as necessary, regional and national
scale, to provide an assessment of its general importance and to allow comparisons of different areas
and sites.

The evaluation will identify resources which are considered to be affected and at risk from all aspects
of the proposed activity by considering:

• The size and extent of an effect.

• The duration of the effect, and seasonality.
• The intensity of the effect.
• The number of environmental components affected.
• The number of inhabitants affected.
• Cumulative effects.
• Reversible and irreversible effects.

2.5.4 Soil Sampling

Four soil samples collected around the site will be analyzed for BTEX, TPH and Heavy metals (Pb,
Hg, Cd and Ni).

2.5.5 Water Sampling

Three water samples (if exist) from nearby water wells will be analyzed for pH, TDS, BTEX, TPH
and Heavy metals (Pb, Hg, Cd and Ni) for the site.

It should be noted that all the analysis will be carried out by Libyan Petroleum Institute (LPI) or/and
industrial research center and University of Tripoli laboratories.

2.5.6 Noise Measurement

Noise measurements will be conducted at selected points of the site.

2.5.7 Air Quality

 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 10 of 29

On site analysis of air quality will be conducted at different locations of the site. The main parameters
to be analyzed will include; NOx, SOx, H2S and VOC, as well as wind speed, humidity and
Temperatures. The Air Monitor instrument will be used to measure the onsite air emission gases, air
temperature and humidity. Specification of this instrument is presented in the Attachment section 9.2.2
below.

2.5.8 Baseline Survey Report (EBS)

A short concise report will be prepared summarizing the results of the baseline survey process.

2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This will include guidelines on:

• MONITORING PROGRAMMES (Monitoring Objectives, Monitoring Implementation,

Environmental Monitoring Procedures Flow Chart and Specification of Monitoring
Requirements).
• Waste management (Waste Management Plan Objectives, Responsibilities, Resourcing,
Reporting, Follow Up, Waste Management Guidelines, Waste Management Techniques, Waste
Treatment, Waste Management Options).
• Oil Spill Hazard and Risk Summary and Oil Spill Contingency Planning (Risk Assessment,
Development of oil spill response strategies, Resources Personnel and Equipment, Oil Spill
Contingency Planning Flow Chart, Oil Spill Training, Exercise and Review).
• Environmental Audit ( Audit Organization, Verification of Health, Safety and Environmental
Controls, Environmental Management System Audits, Environmental Management System
Audits, Contractor Audit, Audit Responsibilities, Inspection ad Audit Flow Chart).
• Employee Awareness & Training (Competence Definition and Assessment, Task Analysis,
Training Needs Analysis, Environmental Motivation and Awareness).
• Decommissioning.

2.6.1 EMP Report

A detailed EMP written report will be developed.

2.7 INFORMATION REQUIRED

Based on the Front End Engineering Design (FEED) for AlAzizyah terminal which was prepared by
TLEC in 2010 and the suitability studies for the proposed new site/location. The studies are Topographic
Site Survey, Geotechnical Investigations, and Hydrological / Hydrogeological Investigations (H/HI).
TLEC will use the following information/data from them is BPMC could not provide the following:-

• General project characteristics.

• Characteristics of petroleum product to be stored (Physical and chemical properties).
• Details of project program.
• Materials: chemicals usage, treatment chemicals, any other hazardous materials.
• Details of fuel storage facility.
• Supply base and supply logistics.
• Number of people involved in the project on site activities.
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 11 of 29

• Estimates of all wastes by type and, preferably, quantity:

− Solid wastes from project activities.
− Emissions (estimated diesel usage for the project activities).
− Discharges (volume estimates for sewage – black and grey water, produced fluids)
• Proposed waste disposal methods:
− Kitchen wastes and general garbage (incinerator?)
− sewage disposal
− medical and hazardous waste disposal
− Other non-combustible wastes (waste oil and lubes, drums and containers, batteries, scrap
metal, etc.)?
• Details of oil spill and emergency plans.
• Details of decommissioning restoration plans.
• Other information to be requested as required.

3. PROJECT MANAGMENT
This project will be conducted by TLEC and its Subcontractor Akakus with a Project Management Team
with similar projects concerning oil and gas activities, will facilitate efficient conduct of all aspects
associated with project management; collecting, analyzing, and reporting the necessary information; and
producing documents useful to the corporate decision-making process. By understanding existing
information and data gaps of a physical, biological, and social environment, potential impacts can be
properly evaluated, something that Akakus key personnel have successfully accomplished for hundreds of
impact-related studies. Subsequent documents produced from those studies have met client and regulatory
agency approvals.

3.1 PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN

The Project Management Team is committed to maintaining a working environment that will protect and
promote the physical and mental health and safety of everyone who works on the EIA as well as other
people affected by the EIA activities. A kick-off meeting (KOM) is proposed in order to facilitate an early
exchange of available information, set up an efficient communication structure, and discuss and agree on
the main objectives of the various tasks as well as reporting and submission mechanisms.

The Project Management Team will submit a tentative Project Execution Plan (PEP) prior to the KOM for
review and finalization. The PEP will cover the following items:
• Detailed approach to implementing the SOW;
• Health and Safety approach in the project;
• Detail of the project team components;
• Detailed project schedule;
• Detailed deliverables to be submitted by the Project Management Team.

3.2 DOCUMENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL

The Project Management Team shall submit the EBS and EIA reports to BPMC for review and approval.
The review period is expected to take no longer than two weeks.

3.3 PROJECT SCHEDULE

 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 12 of 29

An indicative schedule for the provision of the proposed services is provided in section 4 below. Based on
Project Management Team experience, the preparation of an EIA in Libya (including the development of a
field survey and the presentation of the EIA results) can take usually between 4 and 5 months. Timings
can, nevertheless, be quite variable depending on the specific potential requirements from the Authorities
and the security situation at site.

3.4 COMMUNICATIONS AND REPORTING

During the execution of the Service, Akakus will submit progress Meetings/reports showing the status of
the ongoing activities. Meetings and Reporting will be defined by TLEC at the KOM regarding
Daily/weekly/Monthly reports and when it will submitted.

3.5 COMPOSITION AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The overall organizational structure of the Akakus Team is shown in Figure 1. Responsibilities for the
conduct of project tasks and preparation of documents will be shared among various key personnel of the
Project Management Team. The project management approach is to be responsive to client needs, provide
high-quality services, and meet project schedules and budget commitments. The key to meeting these
objectives is to provide the best available staff within a management structure that has specific lines of
authority and accountability.

The Project Management Team Structure is presented in Figure 1 below and the Key project personnel
and their corporate affiliations to the project will be submitted as part of the Project Execution Plan.

Figure 1, Organizational structure

BPMC
Team

Project Document Project QHSE Manager

Control Manager (Part Time)

Technical Project
Manager

Baseline studies and Project description, Impacts assessment Environmental Socioeconomic and
Environmental Alternatives, and and mitigation Legislation and Sociocultural
description Sources of impacts management Issues
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 13 of 29

4. PREPARATION OF EBS/EIA REPORTS

A Draft EBS and EIA Reports will be prepared and submitted in electronic format (Adobe Acrobat or
Microsoft Word) to BPMC for revision and approval. It will fully utilize figures and graphics to illustrate
the information, trends, and results. The revised "final" EBS will be submitted as a part of the complete
EIA report after inclusion of BPMC comments.

5. TIME SCHEDULE
Weeks from Kick off Meeting
Activity Description
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
1. KOM
2. Site Survey and Data Collection
3. Base Line Survey (EBS) including soil and water
sampling, air quality measurement and noise
measurement.
4. Soil and water samples analysis.
5. EBS, EIA& EMP reports writing.
6. EBS, EIA& EMP draft reports. ♦
7. EBS, EIA& EMP final reports. ♦

NOTES: Week for completion of identified Stage.

♦ Symbol = deliverable report.

6. QHSE MANGMENT SYSTEM

6.1 TLEC QHSE
Taknia operates a Quality Management System, which complies with the requirements of ISO
9001. The overall aim of this System is to demonstrate that the quality management system is in
accordance with ISO 9001. New certification is under process,

Taknia has developed its Corporate QMS Manual, and defined the Business, Quality, Safety and
Environment objectives to be implemented to meet client requirements/satisfaction as part of the
ISO Certification of the QMS. Moreover, Taknia will develop the QHSE requirements will be
developed specifically for each project taking into account all legislative and mandatory
requirements and will ensure the integration of QHSE and management practises into one
cohesive system embracing all activities of Taknia and the related procedures.

We at Taknia recognise the similarities and close links between Quality, Health, Safety and
Environmental systems, it is intended that these shall be co-ordinated within the overall Project
Execution Plan. The general Quality (and HSE) Plan will be developed at the commencement of
the Project identifying the overall QHSE arrangements for the Project. This plan will highlight the
major processes and identify the responsibilities and control procedures for the overall scope of
work. It will be structured in a user friendly manner such that it will be easier to read, follow and
understand.
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 14 of 29

Taknia is ISO 9001 certified taking into account that all conducted activities will be based on the
approved Policies and the in house developed HSE management system by Taknia QHSE group
in accordance with the internationally accepted standard ISO 14001 Environmental Management
Systems and the recognised document OHSAS 18001 Occupational health and safety
management systems. This approach will ensure compatibility with ISO 9001 Quality
Management Systems.

To verify compliance with the Project Quality and (HSE) Plan and other documentation making
up the Project Quality and (HSE) Management System, a programme of internal quality and
(HSE) audits shall be undertaken to an agreed schedule. It is the intention that such audits, as
well as providing assurance that quality and (HSE) related activities are being carried out in
accordance with specified requirements, should also be proactive in identifying and facilitating
solutions for any deficiencies detected and for identifying areas for improvement.

6.2 AKAKUS QHSE

Akakus operates an environmental quality assurance system based on the requirements of the
Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment. All environmental impact assessment
work is conducted to IEMA standards and key staff are fully conversant with these requirements
with both registered Principal Environmental Auditor and Full Member status.

7. DELIVERABLES
The Final Report will be produced and issued in four (4) hard copy and four (4) electronic (copies). The
The report will consist of the following sections:
- Environmental Baseline Survey report for the Project.
- Short report outlining agreed standards, scope and basis for EIA.
- Executive EIA Report including EMP.
- EIA study report.
- EMP report.

8. MILESTONE PAYMENT
The below are the Milestone payments:-
➢ 40% after submitting the EBS report for review and approval.
➢ 10% for:-
i. Short report outlining agreed standards, Scope and Basis for EIA.
ii. Executive EIA report including EMP.
40% after submitting the EIA and EMP reports for review and approval.
10% Final Approval of the EBS and EIA by BPMC.

9. REFREBCED DOCUMENTS AND ATTACHMENTS

9.1 Referenced Documents
• TLEC_QHSE_SOW_18_002_Rev_A1_EBS/EIA SOW

9.2 Attachments
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 15 of 29

9.2.1 QHSE Attachments

• ISO 9001:2008 Certification
• QHSE Policy
• Quality Policy
• Environmental Policy
• Other policies are on requests by Clients
- HSE Policy
- Security Policy
- No Smoking Policy
- Driving Policy
- Substance abuse policy
• Akakus HSE Policy
• Akakus Quality Management Policy

9.2.2 Air monitoring Equipment Specification Attachment

 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 16 of 29
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 17 of 29
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 18 of 29
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 19 of 29
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 20 of 29
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 21 of 29
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 22 of 29
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 23 of 29

9.2.2 Air monitoring Equipment Specification Attachment

(AIRPOINTER) equipment used (specifications).

A-1 NO/NO2/NOx - Chemiluminescence Sensor

Ranges: dynamic ranges for NO, NO2, NOX up to 10 ppm
Units: ppb, ppm, μg/m³, mg/m³
Lower Detectable Limit (LDL): < 2 ppb
Zero Drift: < 1 ppb/24 hours
< 2 ppb/7 days
Span Drift: < 1 % of reading/24 hours
< 2 % of reading/7 days
A-2 UV Fluorescence SO2 Sensor
Ranges: dynamic range up to 20 ppm
Units: ppb, ppm, mg/m³, μg/m³
Lower Detectable Limit (LDL): < 1,0 ppb
Zero Dr ift: < 1,0 ppb/24 hours, 2,0 ppb/7 days
Span Drift: < 1,0 % of reading/24 hours
< 2,0 % of reading/7 days
A-3 H2S by UV Fluorescence
(H2S Oxidiser to SO2) DL 1ppb
VOC’s by high sensitivity Photo ionisation DL 0.1ppm
A-4 Infra Red (GFC) CO Sensor
Ranges: dynamic range up to 1000 ppm
Units: ppm, ppb, μg/m³, mg/m³
Lower Detectable Limit (LDL): < 0,08 ppm (RMS)
Zero Drift: < 0,2 ppm/24 hours
< 0,4 ppm/7 days
Span Drift: < 2 % of reading/7 days
A-5 UV Photometric O3 Sensor
Ranges: dynamic range up to 10 ppm
Units: ppb, ppm, μg/m³, mg/m³
Lower Detectable Limit (LDL): < 1,0 ppb (RMS)
Zero Drift: < 1,0 ppb/24 hours
< 1,0 ppb/7 days
Span Drift: < 1,0 % of reading/7 days
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 24 of 29
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 25 of 29
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 26 of 29
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 27 of 29
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 28 of 29
 Technical Proposal
“Brega Al-Kums Terminal EIA/EBS Study”

Page 29 of 29