Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NIM : 1810523011
where ,
VE is the ending value of the portfolio and VB is its beginning value.
This calculation assumes that no funds were added to or withdrawn
from the portfolio by the client during the measurement period. If
such transactions occur, the portfolio return as calculated, Rp, may
not be an accurate measure of the portfolio’s performance. Dollar- 595
Return Calculations
Weighted Rate of Return (DWR), Equates all cash flows, including -597
ending market value, with the beginning market value of the
portfolio. The DWR measures the rate of return to the portfolio
owner; that is, it accurately measures the investor’s return. Time-
Weighted Rate of Return (TWR), Measures the actual rate of return
earned by the portfolio manager. In order to evaluate a manager’s
performance properly, we should use the time-weighted rate of
return. The time-weighted return captures the rate of return actually
earned by the portfolio manager, while the dollar-weighted return
captures the rate of return earned by the portfolio owner.
The two prevalent measures of risk used in investment analysis are
total risk and nondiversifiable, or systematic, risk. Total risk is
measured by calculating the standard deviation, and systematic risk
—that part of total risk that cannot be diversified away—isassessed
by considering the beta for the portfolio. Differences in risk will
cause portfolios to respond differently to changes in the overall
597 &
Risk Considerations market and should be accounted for in evaluating
598
performance.Coefficient of Determination, The square of the
correlation coefficient, measuring the percentage of the variance in
the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variable.
The coefficient of determination indicates the percentage of the
variance in the portfolio’s returns that is explained by the market’s
returns.
What constitutes a good universe or benchmark for the evaluation of
portfolio performance? Characteristics that have been identified
include the following
Performance Unambiguous 598 &
Benchmarks And
Specified in advance 599
Performance Universes
Appropriate
Investable
Measurable
Performance Universe Constructed by aggregating market
Performance Universes valuations and income accruals for a large number of portfolios that 599
are managed individually.
Performance Performance Benchmarks Unmanaged, passive portfolios that reflect
599
Benchmarks a manager’s investment style
A Straightforward Investors today hold various combinations of domestic and foreign 600
Approach To stocks, large-cap stocks and small-cap stocks, different varieties of
Performance bonds, TIPS, and other assets. Each of these asset classes should be
Evaluation evaluated relative to a proper benchmark. ETFs and index funds can
be used effectively in many cases as benchmarks. There are several
choices among the various fund companies for ETFs that could be
used; because Vanguard ETFs often have extremely low expenses,
we will cite several of their funds. Keep in mind there are multiple
alternative in most cases.s. If you hold Treasury and corporate
bonds, you can use Vanguard’s Total Bond Market ETF as a
benchmark. If your bond holdings are limited to one or the other,
Vanguard has ETFs devoted to each, which can be further broken
down to long-term and short-term corporate or Treasury ETFs. If
you hold emerging markets stocks or funds, Vanguard’s MSCI
Emerging Market ETF could serve as a benchmark, as could
Fidelity’s Emerging Markets Fund.
3 Risk-adjusted The Sharpe Rat Sharpe Ratio, A measure of portfolio performance calculated as the 600 –
Measures of ratio of excess portfolio return to the standard deviation. This 602
Performance measure, sometimes called the Reward to Variability (RVAR) Ratio,
can be defined as
Where,
Rpt = the return on portfolio p in period t
RFt = the risk-free rate in period t
Rmt = the return on the market in period t
Ept = a random error term for portfolio p in period t
[ Rmt – RFt ] = the market risk premium during period t
Where the bars above the variables indicate averages for the period
measured.It is important to recognize the role of statistical
significance in the interpretation of Jensen’s measure. Although the
estimated alpha may be positive or negative, it may not be
significantly different (statistically) from zero. If it is not, we would
conclude that the manager of the portfolio being evaluated
performed as expected.Portfolios often fail to meet this statistical
significance test because of the variability in security returns. This
means that if the manager does actually add value, it cannot be
detected statistically.
M2 A big advantage of M2 is that the results are stated in decimal or 606 &
percentage form. 607
Where,
σ M = standard deviation of the market
σ p = standard deviation of the portfolio being measured
Rp = the return on the portfolio whose performance is being
measured