You are on page 1of 1

ST.

PETER BAPTIST COLLEGE FOUNDATION


GROUP 2 (PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT TOOL)

OUTPUT:
 Project Proposals

INDICATOR
Criteria Excellent (4) Very Good (3) Good (2) Poor (1)
The material has been
created in a clear, coherent
and effective as Only 75 % of the Only 50 % of the material
Presentation and Only 25 % of the material
communication material. material expectations expectations are
Content expectations are followed.
The idea and content were are followed. followed.
presented in a good and
outstanding manner.
The presentation of the
The output was imaginative The output techniques The output techniques
output ideas failed to
Significance and and effective in conveying used were effective in used were effective in
capture the interest of the
Creativity ideas to the reader/ conveying main ideas, conveying main ideas,
audience and confusing in
audience. but bit unimaginative. but not imaginative.
what was communicated
The output followed all the
technicalities in writing, and
Mechanics The output followed most
it was organized well and The output followed some
of the technicalities in The output was not organized
(Grammar, clearly written. Words were of the technicalities in
writing, and it was merely and did not follow the proper
Punctuations, chosen that precisely writing, and it was quite
organized and clearly mechanics in writing.
Capitalization) expressed in the intended organized.
written.
meaning and supported
readers’ comprehension.
The output was The output was The output was copied
The output was made
Relevance and authentic and patterned by the aide and has no significance
using most of the
Authenticity completely relevant to of some existing to the readers/
the reader/audience. proposal. existing proposal.
audience.

You might also like