Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BIOPHYSICS
Group 16
DEPARTMENT OF BIOCHEMISTRY
FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES
BOGOR AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY
2018
INTRODUCTION
Density is defined as the ratio between mass and volume or mass per unit
volume or mass per unit volume. It is a measure of how much stuff an object has
in a unit volume (cubic meter or cubic centimetre). Mass is a measure of how
much stuff an object contains, and volume is the measure of how much space an
object occupies in three- dimensional space. The density of an object or quantity
of matter is its mass divided by its volume. This is usually measured under
standard conditions for temperature and pressure: one factor affecting the density
of a material is how concentrated the atoms are in a given volume.
β=∆β / ∆ ᴩH
β is a buffer capacity
∆ ᴩH is the change in ᴩH
The red blood cell, lyses and crenation, these erythrocytes looks as if they
have projections extending from a smaller central area, like a spiked ball. The
crenation may be either large,, irregular spicules of acanthocytes, or smaller, more
echinocytes. When cell surface antigens by flow cytometry, the cells in whole
blood are usually first la- baled, and then the red blood cells are lysed either with
ammonium chloride or commercial whole blood lysing solution (Scallan 2012).
Objective:
METHODOLOGY
Procedure
To measure the density of various solutions, the density for various types of
liquids had been measured using a hydrometer. The density of distilled water,
0.3% NaCl solution, 0.9% NaCl solution, 5% NaCl solution, 5% glucose solution,
coconut water, faucet water, 1% albumen solution and urine were measured. The
temperature of solution samples were recorded with a thermometer. All the data
were recorded in a table.
To determine the surface tension of a liquid, a needle was placed on a watch glass
and then filled up with distilled water slowly until the needle floats. The step is
then repeated using distilled water with bile, coconut water, river water and
detergent. The results obtained were observed and recorded.
The pipette was rinsed and cleaned thoroughly using distilled water before the
experiment began. The pipette was then held in a straight and upright position for
2 minutes. Then, the number of droplets of 1 mL of distilled water dropped from a
pipette was counted and recorded. The experiment was repeated by using 20%
NaCl solution, alcohol and detergent.
The same volume of oil and water was added in a test tube and shaken until the
solution became homogeneous. To identify the components of coconut oil in the
emulsion, a few drops of Sudan red was added in the solution. The stability of the
emulsion was compared when the solution was shaken longer and excessively.
The solution was then observed under the microscope. The experiment was
repeated using coconut oil and soap.
1g of Arab gum was weighed and mixed with 5mL of coconut oil in a mortar. The
Arab gum was crushed until it became a homogeneous mixture and then 3 ml of
distilled water was added. It was stirred until it became concentrated and 5 ml of
distilled water was added slowly while stirring it. The stability of emulsion was
observed in a test tube. A drop of emulsion was observed under the microscope.
Natural emulsion
Milk is a natural emulsion. The stability of the emulsion was observed in a test
tube. A drop of the emulsion was observed under the microscope.
Industrious emulsion
Margarine was added with a drop of Sudan red and observed under the
microscope. The type of emulsion of each sample was determined after observing
each of them under the microscope.
Many types of apparatus were used in this experiment. As for the colloid
experiment, a 250 ml beaker glass was used to contain the solutions. A 10 ml
pipette, test tubes and other beaker glasses were used as well. As for the osmotic
pressure experiment, test tubes and a dropper were used. A microscope was also
used to observe the specimen. As for the buffer experiment, a pH meter was used
to observe the pH values. A 10 ml pipette and few test tubes were used to measure
and hold liquids. A stirrer was also used to mix the liquids.
Many materials were used to conduct the experiment. As for the colloid
experiment, the materials used were distilled water, ferrocyanide kalium 0.2 N,
ferrichloride 0.02 N, ferrihydroxide 33%, NaCl 10%, Mg SO4 salt to prepare the
gelatin colloid 2%, starch colloid 2%, berlin blue colloid 0.2 N. Some of the
colloids were also used in the precipitation experiment. As for the osmotic
pressure experiment, NaCl 0.3%, 0.9%, 5% and blood were used. Acetic acid 0.1
1 1
N, sodium acetate 0.1 N, Na2 HPO 4 M and KH 2 PO 44 M were used in the
15 15
buffer experiment.
Procedure
25 ml H2O with 2g of gelatin is added into a 250 ml beaker. The gelatin was left
for a few minutes until all gelatin had absorbed the water and expanded. Then 75
ml of boiling water was added and stirred. The results were recorded.
A mixture involving 10 ml of cold water with 2g of starch was created and it was
stirred until it became homogeneous. After that, 70 ml of boiling water was added
and stirred. The results were recorded.
200 ml of boiling water was poured and then 1 ml of ferrihydroxide 33% was
channeled to it using a pipette. The colour that appears after the solution becomes
homogeneous was observed. The results were recorded.
A few millilitre of 10% NaCl was added into one of the lyophilic colloids to form
a precipitate. Distilled water was added if a saturated sediment was obtained. Mg
SO4 salt was also added until a saturated solution was obtained if there was no
production of sediment. The results were recorded.
A small amount of NaCl 10% was added to a lyophobic colloid. This step was
continued until a precipitate was formed. The result was recorded.
A solution of 15% gelatin was set up and then distributed to 4 test tubes. The test
tubes were froze until a formation of gel could be seen. Berlin blue solution, Eosin
solution, giemsa solution and a CuSO 4 5% colloid solution were prepared. Those
solutions had been stored in a refrigerator for one night. The results were
recorded. To prevent melting, the precaution taken was that the gel was kept in a
proper way.
A mixture of acetic acid 0.1 N with sodium acetate 0.1 N was prepared using the
following amounts respectively ; 9.25 ml with 0.75 ml, 8.20 ml with 1.80 ml, 6.30
ml with 3.70 ml, 4.00 ml with 6.00 ml and 2.10 ml with 7.90 ml. The pH of the
solutions was measured after they were stirred until they became homogeneous.
The results were recorded.
1 1
A mixture of M Na2 HPO 4with M KH 2 PO 44 was prepared using the
15 15
following amounts respectively; 2.50ml with 9.50ml, 1.20ml with 8.80ml, 2.65ml
with 7.35ml, 5.00ml with 5.00ml, 7.15ml with 2.85ml. The pH of each of the
solutions were measured. The results were recorded.
Osmotic pressure of liquid red blood cells
Three test tubes, one containing NaCl 0.3%, another NaCl 0.9%, and the other
NaCl 5% were prepared. Two to three drops of blood were placed in each test
tube. The precipitation formed between the three test tubes were observed. The
solution was observed under a microscope. The observations and results were
recorded.
Density
Based on the results, distilled aqua, tap water, albumin 1% solution, NaCl
0.3% and 0.9% solutions have low densities due to low concentrations of
dissolved substances in them. Distilled aqua has the lowest density due to the fact
that it have little to no dissolved substance in it. In contrast, density of tap water is
slightly above water because it contains contaminants and minerals. NaCl 5%
solution has the highest density in comparison to NaCl 0.3% and 0.9% solutions
because it contains the highest concentration of solute. Besides, glucose 5%
solution has high density as well due to its high concentration. According to
Montalbán, the higher the molecular weight of an ionic solution, the higher the
density (Montalbán et al. 2017). Thus, for the case of coconut water, its density is
high as due to the presence of ions thus it has a higher molecular weight.
Table 1. Density of Solute
Type of Tsolute Tdensitometer Measured Correction Correction
Solute Density factor Density
Tap water 25℃ 20℃ 1.002 g/cm3 0.002 g/cm3 1.004 g/cm3
Distilled 25℃ 20℃ 1.000 g/cm3 0.002 g/cm3 1.002 g/cm3
aqua
NaCl 0.3% 25℃ 20℃ 1.002 g/cm3 0.002 g/cm3 1.004 g/cm3
NaCl 0.9% 25℃ 20℃ 1.004 g/cm3 0.002 g/cm3 1.006 g/cm3
NaCl 5% 25℃ 20℃ 1.026 g/cm3 0.002 g/cm3 1.028 g/cm3
Coconut 22℃ 20℃ 1.020 g/cm3 0.001 g/cm3 1.021 g/cm3
water
Albumin 25℃ 20℃ 1.006 g/cm3 0.002 g/cm3 1.008 g/cm3
1%
Glucose 25℃ 20℃ 1.010 g/cm3 0.002 g/cm3 1.012 g/cm3
5%
Formulas
Tsolute−Tdensitometer
CF = ×10−3
3
25 ℃−20 ℃
CF of Tap water= ×10−3
3
CF of Tap water=0.00166 ρ
CF of Tap water ≈ 0.002 ρ
Table 4. Emulsion
Emulsion Water + Detergent + Gum Arabic + Milk Margarine
Palm oil Palm oil Palm oil
Stability -- -- + + +
Colloid
Picture
Gelatin 15% solution is prepared and 5mL of the solution was inserted into
4 test tubes. In each test tubes, Berlin blue, CuSO4, eosin, and giemsa solution
was added respectively. Colloid solution characteristics were then observed. We
noticed that only Berlin blue could not diffuse into the gelatin 15% solution when
mixed. This is because Berlin blue is lyophobic colloid while gelatin solution is
lyophilic solution. The forces of interaction between lyophobic and lyophilic
colloids are weak or even no interaction. Lyophobic solutions have weak affinity
towards their medium of dispersion.
On the other side, when CuSO4, eosin and giemsa were added into gelatin
15% solution, we can see that the 3 solutions have started to diffuse to the gelatin
15% solution. The reason behind this is because all the 3 solutions are lyophilic
and gelatin solution is also lyophilic. Gelatin 15% solution can form strong forces
of interaction with all CuSO4, eosin and giemsa solution. Lyophilic solutions
have higher affinity towards their medium dispersion, hence they can diffuse into
the gelatin solution.
Picture
Buffer
n
M= V
n = M ×V
1l
n = 0.1 M × 9.25 ml × 1000ml
n = 0.925 M
Mole of sodium acetate :
n
M= V
n = M×V
1l
n = 0.1 M × 0.75ml × 1000 ml
=0.075
5
Ka of Acetic acid = 1.76 10
0.925 M
5
1.76 10 × 0.075 M
=
-4
= 2.171 10
pH = - log [ H ]
-4
= - log 2.171 10
= 3.663
pH
Buffer capacity = pKa
3.663
= 4.754
= 0.78
Mole of KH 2 PO 4 :
n
M= V
n = M ×V
1 1l
n = 15 M × 9.50 ml × 1000 ml
n = 0.633 M
Mole of Na2HPO4 :
n
M= V
n = M ×V
1 1l
n = 15 M × 0.50 ml × 1000 ml
n = 0.033M
8
Ka of Na2HPO4 = 6.23 10
mol of KH 2 PO 4
H ] = Ka × mol of Na 2 HPO 4
0.633M
8
6.23 10 × 0.033M
=
6
= 1.1950 10
pH = -log [ H ]
6
= -log 1.1950 10
= 5.922
pKa = -log [Ka]
8
= -log 6.23 10
= 7.206
pH
Buffer Capacity = pKa
5.922
= 7.206
= 0.823
The data in table 9 illustrates that the theoretical pH and buffer capacity are
different. The standard phosphate buffer solution has a buffer capacity of 0.823.
The results are obtained according to different volume of the solution used. If the
volume of Na2HPO4 is higher than the volume of KH2PO4 , the pH will be higher.
The higher the pH value, the bigger the buffer capacity.
Besides, the pH has a slight difference when comparing the pH measured and
the theoretical pH. This is probably cause by parallax error or inaccurate
measurement during experiment.
The three major buffer systems of our body are carbonic acid bicarbonate
buffer system, phosphate buffer system and protein buffer system. The body's
chemical buffer system consists of three individual buffers out of which the
carbonic acid bicarbonate buffer is the most important. Cellular respiration
produces carbon dioxide as a waste product. This is immediately converted to
bicarbonate ion in the blood. On reaching the lungs it is again converted to and
released as carbon dioxide. While in the blood, it neutralises acids released due to
other metabolic processes. In the stomach and deudenum it also neutralises gastric
acids and stabilises the intra cellular pH of epithelial cells by the secretions of
bicarbonate ions into the gastric mucosa (Kreig et al. 2014). Phosphate buffer
system operates in the internal fluids of all cells. It consists of dihydrogen
phosphate ions as the hydrogen ion donor (acid) and hydrogen phosphate ion as
the ion acceptor (base). If additional hydroxide ions enter the cellular fluid, they
are neutralised by the dihydrogen phosphate ion. If extra hydrogen ions enter the
cellular fluid then they are neutralised by the hydrogen phosphate ion. Protein
buffer system helps to maintain acidity in and around the cells. Haemoglobin
makes an excellent buffer by binding to small amounts of acids in the blood,
before they can alter the pH of the blood. Other proteins containing amino acid
histidine are also good at buffering. The main purpose of all these buffers is to
maintain proper pH within the body system so that all biochemical process can
take place.
Osmotic Pressure
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Atkins Peter W, Julio de Paula. 2010. Physical Chemistry (9th edition). UK:
Oxford University Press.
Bettelheim FA, Brown WH, Campbell MK, Farrell SO, Torres O. 2015.
Introduction to General, Organic and Biochemistry. US: Cengage
Learning.
Burdon RS. 2014. Surface Tension and the Spreading of Liquids. Cambridge UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H, Fredlund MD. 2012. Unsaturated Soil Mechanics in
Engineering Practice. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Krieg Brian J, Taghavi Seyed Mohammad, Amidon Gordon L. Amidon Gregory
E. 2014. "In Vivo Predictive Dissolution: Transport Analysis of the CO2,
Bicarbonate In Vivo Buffer System". Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
103 (11).
Kumar H and Sheetal. 2016. “Densities and speeds of sound of d(+)-glucose,
d(−)-fructose, d(+)-xylose and d(−)-ribose in aqueous tripotassium citrate
solutions at different temperatures.” J. Chem. Eng. Data. 61(7):2244–
2259.
Machado CMM, Gameiro P, Soares HMVM. 2008. “Complexation of M-
(buffer)x-(OH)y systems involving divalent ions (cobalt or nicket) and
zwitterionic biological buffers (AMPSO, DIPSO, TAPS and TAPSO) in
aqueous solution.” J. Solution Chem. 37(5): 603-617
Montalbán MG, González MC, Baños FGD, Víllora G. 2017. “Predicting density
and refractive index of ionic liquids.” Progress and Developments in Ionic
Liquids. 1(1):15.
Saha D and Bhattacharya S. 2010. “Hydrocolloids as thickening and gelling
agents in food: a critical review.” Journal of Food Science Technology.
47(6): 587-597.
Vaclavik V and Christian EW. 2014. Essentials of Food Science. USA: Springer
Verlag