MALIOER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

101295
Malioer, Bayambang, Pangasinan

ENHANCED
SCHOOL
IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
School Year 2019-2022

School Improvement Plan

i
MESSAGE

“A goal without a plan is just a wish.” –Antoine de Saint Exupery

It is indeed very indispensable for an organization and the institution to plan well in
order to set things right. Planning entails a lot of efforts, critical and reflective thinking, and
decision-making skills. It is nothing but thinking before the action takes place. It helps us to
be proactive rather than reactive. The School Improvement Plan (SIP), the school’s 3-year
plan, is a roadmap that lays down specific interventions that the school will undertake. It
focuses on the three key areas: access, quality, and governance. It is evident-based, results-
based and learner-centered. The SIP should not end in itself, the action must be of equal
significance to materialize our plans and aspirations.

The collaboration of the community and other stakeholders is a must and a best
practice which will give rise to effective assessment, planning and responding. Stakeholders
involvement to the program, activities and projects of the school paves way to stronger
partnership as embodied in the School-Based Management (SBM). Through the concerted
effort of everyone, nothing is impossible, nothing is difficult and we can make the ordinary
to be an extraordinary. This is in consonance with our thrust of building the foundation and
honing the future of our most important clientele---our learners.

Hence, I am proud that in Malioer Elementary School, We are United as One, We

Work as One! We are Happy to Serve!

ROBERT P. REBAMONTAN
Principal I

School Improvement Plan

ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1. Department of Education’s Vision, Page 1

Mission, and Core Values Statement

CHAPTER 2. School’s Current Situation Page 3

CHAPTER 3. Plan Page 8

CHAPTER 4. Monitoring and Evaluation Page 21

List of Acronyms Page iv

List of Tables Page v

School Improvement Plan

iii
LIST OF ACRONYMS

AIP-
Annual
Implemen
tation
Plan

BE-
Brigada
Eskwela

DepEd-
Departme
nt of
Education

FGD-
Focus
Group
Discussio
n

GPP-
Gulayan
sa
Paaralan
Program

ICT-
Informati
on and
Communi
cation
Technolog
y

IDP-
Individual
Developm
ent Plan

LRMDS-
Learning
Resources
Managem
ent and

School Improvement Plan

iv
Developm
ent
System

MES-
Malioer
Elementar
y School

PAPs-
Programs,
Projects
and
Activities

PIAs-
Priority
Improvem
ent Areas

PMRF-
Project
Monitorin
g Report
Form

PTA-
Parents-
Teachers
Associatio
n

SBFP-
School-
Based
Feeding
Program

SBM-
School-
Based
Managem
ent

SIP-
School
Improvem
ent Plan

SPT-

School Improvement Plan

v
School-
Communi
ty
Planning
Team

VMVC-
Vission,
Mission
and Core
Values

WINS-
Water,
Sanitation
and
Hygienne-
In- School

School Improvement Plan

vi
LIST OF TABLES AND ILLUSTRATIONS

Table 1. Roles and Responsibilities of SPT Members Page 1-2

Table 2. SPT Timetable Page 2

Table 3. Priority Improvement Areas Page 4-5

Table 4. Planning Worksheet for ACCESS and QUALITY Page 5-6

Table 5. Planning Worksheet for GOVERNANCE Page 6-7

Table 6. Project 3M Project Workplan and Budget Matrix Page 8

Table 7. Project “Malusog na Kabataan, Malusog na Paaralan Page 8-9

Project Workplan and Budget Matrix

Table 8. Project READ Project Workplan and Budget Matrix Page 9-10

Table 9. Project PALM Project Workplan and Budget Matrix Page 10

Table 10. Project PLDT Project Workplan and Budget Matrix Page 11

Table 11. Project 3S Project Workplan and Budget Matrix Page 11

Table 12. Project SMP Project Workplan and Budget Matrix Page 12

Table 13. Project EBES Project Workplan and Budget Matrix Page 12-13

Table 14. Annual Implementation Plan for S.Y. 2019-2020 Page 13-16

Table 15. Annual Implementation Plan for S.Y. 2020-2021 Page 17-19

Table 16. Annual Implementation Plan for S.Y. 2021-2022 Page 19-20

Table 17. Project Monitoring Report Form Page 21-22

School Improvement Plan

vii
CHAPTER 1
Department of Education Mission, Vision, and Core Values C
Statement H
The vision of the school head and the stakeholders toward the school is very crucial in
A
planning. It is how they see the institution in the future and project how far it can go. During P
the Vision Sharing Activity, the school head asked the other members of the School- T
Community Planning Team (SPT) to draw in a piece of paper the kind of school they want for
their children. It was divulged that they too have much expectations, plans and aspirations E
for the school and the learners. SPT’s aspirations include but not limited to the following: 1) R
Pupils are well-equipped with knowledge and skils including that of Information and
Communication Technology (ICT); 2) They are safe while they are in school---free from
bullying, injuries and accidents; 3) The immediate needs of learners are provided; 4) The 1
school has facilities for a child-friendly environment; 5) Modern equipment are present; 6)
Teachers are competent; 7) Mentors and learners are winners in higher level of
competitions; 8) Fame is regarded to the school because of its awards and recognitions; 9)
Human and material resources are available; and 10) School leadership and management
are effective.

On the other hand, the DepEd Vision, Mission and Core Values (VMCV) were presented
before the SPT members. The SPT members are open-minded enough to understand the
department’s VMCV. Based on their discernment, learners must be nationalistic, values-
oriented, and skillful. Hence, their own potential and intelligence must be developed.
According to them, internal and external stakeholders have specific mission or task to do to
cater the needs of our school children. Thus, their active participation and support to the
Programs, Activities and Projects (PAPs) is a must to fully realize the holistic development of
the learners and the improvement of the school itself. More so, such vision and mission
must be anchored by core values to actualize the DepEd’s thrust of providing the school
clientele with quality, accessible, relevant and liberating education.

Furthermore, based on their understanding, the members of the SPT have committed their
full support to the goals of the department in general and the PAPs of the school in
particular. They have agreed that they will keep abreast in the gradual improvement of the
institution which will largely benefit the learners and the community. The SPT also pledged
to encourage more stakeholders to join the said endeavors.

During the brainstorming session, the SPT members discussed and agreed upon their roles
and responsibilities.

Table 1. Roles and Responsibilities of SPT Members

SPT Member Roles and Responsibilities
School Head  Convenes the School-Community Planning Team
 Provides leadership and guidance in the development of
the plan; clearly explains the SIP planning process to the
planning team and helps them understand their roles in
the process
 Facilitates the actual planning workshop

School Improvement Plan

1
 Student  Shares insights about their challenges in the school
Representative  Participates in setting goals, stategies and priorities of the
school
Parent  Shares insights about what their children need to learn
Representative and the challenges they face in the school, their
aspiration and presents other areas of concern
 Commits available resources in the implementation of the
plan
Teacher  Provides needed information relative to teaching-learning
Representative process
 Actively participates during the SIP establishment of
priorites, setting of goals and formulation of strategies for
the plan
Barangay LGU  Shares valuable information on the interest of the
Representative community and participate in the setting of goals,
strategies and priorities of the school
 Commits available resources in the implementation of the
plan
Member of the  Presents to the body the Child Protection Policy; Shares
School Child experience/s of the school regarding the issues on
Protection bullying
Committee  Actively participates during the SIP establishment of
priorites, setting of goals and formulation of strategies for
the plan
Member of  Shares ideas on protocols and contingency plans during
BDRRMC disasters; Coordinates with other agencies in times of
emergency
 Commits available resources in the implementation of the
plan

Lastly, the SPT timetable was formulated in the preparation, implementation, and
monitoring of the SIP which will serve as guide to all SPT members and the school-
community at large.

Table 2. SPT Timetable

ACTIVITIES SCHEDULE
Preparatory Activities
1. Secure the CMBS from the LGU January 2019
2. Organize the data using the school- February 2019
community data template
Phase 1. Assess
1. Conduct survey and FGD February 2019
2. Discuss the root cause March 2019
Phase 2. Plan
1. Write the SIP February 2019
2. Brain Storm solutions May 2019

School Improvement Plan

2
 Phase 3. Act
1. Start pilot test June –August 2019
2. Discuss preparations for roll out September 2019 C
CHAPTER 2 H
A
Assess
P
School’s Current Situation T
Malioer Elementary School (MES) is one of the schools in the 3 rd legislative district situated
E
at Barangay Malioer, Municipality of Bayambang, Province of Pangasinan. It is 14 km and 56 R
km away from the town proper and division office, respectively. Tricycle and jeepney are
used as means of transportation.
2
The school is composed of a school head with Principal I position, 1 Master Teacher, 5
Teacher III, and 5 Teacher I. Their educational attainment varies: 2 teachers are Master of
Education degree holders with doctoral units, 3 are Master of Education graduate, and the
rest have masteral units. They work collaboratively to better serve the stakeholders.

MES has 12 classrooms from Kindergarten to Grade 6 and a room used as canteen/feeding
room. From these, 8 classrooms are newly repaired. These buildings are catering 309 pupils
of whom 146 are males and 163 are females. Based on the data gathered, it is 11 or 6%
lower compared to the previous enrolment. This concern is included in the area of focus of
the improvement planning.

On the other hand, the school has an average classroom-learner ratio of 28:1, 30:1 pupil-
teacher ratio and a pupil-book ratio of 1:1 except for Grade 6 where only 2 subjects namely
EsP and Mathematics textbooks were given. Ergo, interventions must be adopted and this is
contained in the school’s Priority Improvement Areas (PIAs).

Moreover, MES has a School-Based Feeding Program (SBFP) with 45 beneficiaries or 15 % of

the pupils and is targeted to be lessen by 5% at the end of three years. This is within the
efforts of the school and stakeholders to eradicate malnourishment among the clientele.

Furthermore, the institution has facilities and equipment to enhance pupils’ learning with a
child-friendly environment but due to financial constraints some of these can’t be provided
such as the SMART/LED televisions which are aligned with the division’s Digital Rise Program
(DRP) and handwashing and toothbrushing facilities for the Water, Sanitation & Hygiene-In-
Schools (WINS) Program, among others.

Lastly, the school is surrounded by residential houses where most of the people are farmers.
Some are in the the military service and teaching field. Others are working in town and
abroad. As part of the school community together with the Parents-Teachers Association
(PTA), they are regularly extending their help in feeding program, Brigada Eskwela (BE),
Gulayan sa Paaralan Program (GPP) and the like. Although their supports are always at hand,
the larger part of the community don’t partake. Thus, winning the heart of other
stakeholders is one of the school’s projects.

School Improvement Plan

3
School Improvement Plan
4
Priority Improvement Areas

Based on the results of the discussions done in the previous activity, the School Planning
Team has prioritized the improvement areas. These PIAs are selected areas in school
management, operations, and service delivery that need to be changed to improve the three
key result areas in basic education: access, quality, and governance.

Table 3. Priority Improvement Areas

Strategic
Improvement Urgen- Magni Feasibilit
Import- Average Interpretation
Areas cy -tude y
ance

Participation Rate 4 4 4 3 3.75 High Priority

Nutritional Status 5 5 5 4 4.75 Very High

of Pupils Priority

Pupils’ Reading 5 4 5 4 4.5 Very High

Progress Level Priority

Handwashing and 3 3 4 4 3.5 High Priority

Toothbrushing
Facilities

Window Grating of 3 3 4 3 3.25 Moderate

Canteen/Feeding Priority
and Grade 3
Rooms

Construction and 3 3 3 3 3 Moderate

Repainting of Plant Priority
Boxes

SMART/LED 5 5 5 4 4.75 Very High

Televisions Priority

Learner 5 5 5 3 4.5 Very High

Materials/Text Priority
Books

Study Sheds and 3 3 4 3 3.25 Very High

Benches Priority

Teachers’ 5 4 5 5 4.75 Very High

Competence Priority

Quality 4 5 4 5 4.5 Very High

Management Priority
System

School Improvement Plan

5
 Construction of 3 3 4 3 3.25 Moderate
Herbarium Priority

School Garden 3 3 4 4 3.5 High Priority

Planning Worksheet

The SPT through a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) has presented the following Priority
Improvement Areas (PIAs). These areas will be addressed by organized Project Team.
Depending on the gravity or difficulty, some can be resolved within a year and some can
span for three years.

Table 4. Planning Worksheet for ACCESS and QUALITY

TIME FRAME
PRIORITY
GENERAL SY SY SY
IMPROVEMENT ROOT CAUSE/S
OBJECTIVE/S 2019- 2020- 2021-
AREAS
2020 2021 2022

To increase  Family-related □ □ □
enrolment problems
Participation Rate  by 2%  Change of
additional residence
learners  Distance of
school
 Poverty □ □ □
 Lack of
To reduce
awareness on
the no. of
the importance
learners who of good health
Nutritional Status
are wasted  Less nutritious
of Pupils
and severely foods prepared
wasted from by families
15% to 5%  No breakfast
meal before
attending school
Pupils’ Reading To improve  Poor vocabulary □ □ □
Progress Level  the reading development
level of  Lack of reading
pupils by 5% interests
 Lack of teachers’
technique in
teaching
beginning
reading
 No home follow-
ups of parents
 Lack of

School Improvement Plan

6
 TIME FRAME
PRIORITY
GENERAL SY SY SY
IMPROVEMENT ROOT CAUSE/S
OBJECTIVE/S 2019- 2020- 2021-
AREAS
2020 2021 2022
appropriate
reading materials
 Limited number □ □ □
To
of participants
capacitate to district and
teachers division trainings
Teachers’
through  Identified teacher
Competence
attendance needs based on
to In-Service accomplished IDP
Trainings

Table 5.Planning Worksheet for GOVERNANCE

TIME FRAME
PRIORITY SY SY SY
GENERAL
IMPROVEMENT ROOT CAUSE/S 2019- 2020- 2021-
OBJECTIVE/S
AREAS 2020 2021 2022

To provide □ □
enough
Learners’  Non-delivery
Learners’ of K to 12
Materials for □
Materials to materials for
Grade 6
be used by the grade
Grade 6 pupils
To strengthen  Lack of parents’ □ □ □
school & participation
Stakeholders’
community  Lack of mechanisms
Support &
partnership to encourage
Partnership
from 65% to stakeholders’
85% support

To improve □ □
the school’s
 Lack of data
quality
Quality management
management mechanisms
Management □
system which  Lack of
System
will fast track trainings on
office QMS
transactions
Enhancement of To enrich  Lack of □ □ □
Basic Education learners’ SMART/LED

School Improvement Plan

7
 TIME FRAME
PRIORITY SY SY SY
GENERAL
IMPROVEMENT ROOT CAUSE/S 2019- 2020- 2021-
OBJECTIVE/S
AREAS 2020 2021 2022

televisions
 Inadequate
number of
handwashing
and
toothbrushing
facilities
access to  Inadequate
education number of
with study sheds
Services enhanced and benches
learning and  Unsecured
child-friendly rooms for
canteen/feedi
environment
ng and Grade
3 class
 Unrepainted
plant boxes
 Lack of
Herbarium
 Unmaintained
school garden

School Improvement Plan

8
CHAPTER 3
Plan C
H
A. Project Work Plan & Budget Matrix A
In this Section, the SPT has presented the list of solutions for the identified root causes. P
These identified solutions are those that have satisfied the criteria provided.
T
1. Project Title: Project 3M (Masayang Mag-aral sa Malioer ES) E
Problem Statement: Only 96% of the total population age 5-12 are
enrolled in the school R
Project Objective Statement: To increase enrolment by 2% additional learners
Root Causes: Family problem, change of residence, distance of
school 3
Table 6 Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Date of Person Budget

Activity Output Budget
Implementation Responsible Source

Intensify
Early MOOE
enrolment January-March  School Head 1,500.00
Registration Fund
campaign  Teachers
Conduct MOOE
Child May-June  School Head
Child 1,000.00 Fund
Mapping  Teachers
Mapping

2. Project Title: Project “Malusog na Kabataan, Malusog na

Paaralan”
Problem Statement: 15% out of 320 pupils fall outside the normal health
status
Project Objective Statement: To reduce the no. of learners who are wasted and
severely wasted from 15% to 5%
Root Causes: Poverty, lack of awareness on the importance of
good health

Table 7 Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Person
Date of Budget
Activity Output Responsibl Budget
Implementation Source
e

Conduct  School
 Baseline/Endline
School-Based September- Head SBFP
Nutritional 162,000
Feeding December  Teachers Fund
Status Report
Program  PTA
Officers
Conduct Self- Nutritional Status January-March 2,100 Canteen

School Improvement Plan

9
  School
Head
Help Feeding Report  Teachers Fund
Program  PTA Fund
Officers

 School
Conduct of Head
No. of dewormed February &
Deworming  Teachers 1,500
learners August
Activity  District
Nurse
Classroom Handwashing of  School
MOOE
Handwashin pupils before and June-March Head 1,500
Fund
g Activity after recess  Teachers

3. Project Title: Project READ (Reading Enhancement Advocacy and

Development)
Problem Statement: 9% of 320 pupils fall under frustration level
Project Objective Statement: To improve the reading level of pupils by 5%
Root Causes: Poor vocabulary development, lack of reading
interests, lack of teachers’ technique in teaching
beginning reading, no home follow-ups of parents,
lack of appropriate reading materials

Table 8 Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Date of Person Budget

Activity Output Budget
Implementation Responsible Source

Conduct  PHIL-IRI June (Pre)

 School Head
Reading Results February (Post)
 English
Inventory  Reading Pieces MOOE
Coordinator 4,500
Test/PHIL-IRI Fund
 Teachers
(Pre & Post
Test)
Construct Big Visual Products June-December
 School Head
books, Dolch
 English MOOE
charts and 5,000
Coordinator Fund
other reading
 Teachers
materials
Conduct  Training June-March  School Head
Beginning Matrix  English
Reading  IPD Result Coordinator MOOE
6,000
INSET/Group  No. of  ELLN Fund
Sessions/ELLN teachers Facilitator
trained  Teachers

School Improvement Plan

10
 Conduct  List of June-March
Reading References
Sessions  Progress
 School Head
 Remedial Reports
 Teachers None None
Reading
 Peer
Teaching/
Tutoring
Institutionalize  Functional June
Classroom Reading  School Head
Reading Corner  Teachers None None
Corner  List of Books
 Log Sheet

4. Project Title: Project PALM (Pupils’ Additional Learning Materials)

Problem Statement: Only 2 subjects namely EsP and Mathematics
textbooks were given to te Grade 6 Pupils
Project Objective Statement: To provide enough Learners’ Materials to be used
by Grade 6 pupils
Root Cause: Non-delivery of K to 12 materials for the grade

Table 9 Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Date of Person Budget

Activity Output Budget
Implementation Responsible Source

Enrollment of
teachers to the Created
Learning account of
May Teachers
Resources teachers in None None
Management and LRMDS Portal
Development
System (LRMDS)

Downloading of Downloaded
Learners’ LRMDS LMs June-March Teachers MOOE
1,000
Materials from for all learning Fund
LRMDS Portal areas

Conduct School  School

Learning Action No. of Head MOOE
October 5,000
Cell (SLAC) on IM prepared IMs  Teachers Fund
Preparation

School Improvement Plan

11
 5. Project Title:
Problem Statement:
Project Objective Statement:
Root Causes:
Project PLDT (Professional Learning and
Development of Teachers)
Teachers are currently enrolled in graduate studies
but most of them need training on teaching
strategies
To capacitate teachers through attendance to In-
Service Trainings
Limited number of participants to district and
division trainings, identified teacher needs based on
accomplished IDP

Table 10 Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Person
Date of Budget
Activity Output Responsibl Budget
Implementation Source
e
Individual
Individual
Identifying teachers’
Development May None None
competence & skills Teachers
Plan (IDP)
results
Attend school,
district, division, Certificate/ Teachers
June to March MOOE
regional, national Attendance 10,000
Fund
and international to Trainings
training workshop

6. Project Title: Project 3S (Stronger Stakeholders’ Support)

Problem Statement:
Project Objective Statement:
Root Cause:
Only 65% out of 280 parents are attending school
programs and activities
To strengthen school & community partnership
from 65% to 85%
Lack of parents’ participation, lack of mechanisms to
encourage stakeholders’ support

Table 11 Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Date of Person Budget

Activity Output Budget
Implementation Responsible Source

 Notice of
Invite all
Meetings
stakeholders
 Attendance to  School
to participate
various school June to May Head PTA
in various 10,000
program and  Teachers Fund
school
activities  PTA
programs and
 Certificate of
activities
Appreciation

School Improvement Plan

12
 7. Project Title: Project SMP (Speedy Management of Processes)
Problem Statement: Only 80% efficiency of the school’s quality
management system is offered to stakeholders
Project Objective Statement: To improve the school’s quality management
system which will fast track office transactions
Root Causes: Lack of data management mechanisms, lack of
trainings on QMS

Table 12 Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Date of Person Budget

Activity Output Budget
Implementation Responsible Source

 Quality
Conduct
Procedures
procedures
 Quality December-  School
align to MOOE
Forms February Head 40,000.00
Quality Fund/SEF
 Certificate/  Teachers
Management
Attendance
System
to Trainings

8. Project Title: Project EBES (Enhanced Basic Education Services)

Problem Statement:
Project Objective Statement:
Root Causes:
School facilities and equipment are limited for the
pupils to experience enhanced learning and child-
friendly environment
To enrich learners’ access to education with
enhanced learning and child-friendly environment
Lack of enhanced learning environments to help
them to enrich their access to education

Table 13 Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Person
Date of Budget
Activity Output Responsibl Budget
Implementation Source
e
12
 School
Procurement of SMART/LED
May-October Head
SMART/LED televisions for 66,000 PTA Fund
 Advisers
televisions all grade
 PTA
levels
Functional  School
Construction of
handwashing Head MOOE
handwashing and
and April-May  Teachers 35,000 Fund/PTA
toothbrushing
toothbrushing  PTA Fund
facility
facility

School Improvement Plan

13
 Construction of 2
 School
study sheds and Functional
Head
acquisition of study sheds June-July 25,000 PTA Fund
 Teachers
benches/garden and benchers
 PTA
set

Secured  School
Window grating
rooms for Head MOOE
of rooms for
canteen/feedi April-May  Teachers 25,000 Fund/PTA
canteen/feeding
ng and Grade  PTA Fund
and Grade 3 class
3 class

Repainting of Beautified
School MOOE
plant boxes and school April-May 25,000
Head Fund
other structures surroundings

 School
Construction of Functional Head MOOE
April-May 15,000
herbarium herbarium  Teachers Fund
 PTA
Functional
 School
school MOOE
Rehabilitation of Head
garden/Gulay April-May 10,000 Fund/PTA
school garden  Advisers
aan sa Fund
 PTA
Paaralan

B. Annual Implementation Plan (AIP)

The Annual Implementation Plan, the SIP’s operational plan, contains specific projects that
will be undertaken by the school in a particular year.

Table14. Annual Implementation Plan for S.Y. 2019-2020

SCHOOL
BUDGET
IMPROVEMEN PROJECT OUTPUT FOR THE PERSON(S) SCHEDULE/ BUDGET
ACTIVITIES PER
T PROJECT OBJECTIVE YEAR RESPONSIBLE VENUE SOURCE
ACTIVITY
TITLE

 School
Intensify Head January- MOOE
To increase Early Registration enrolment  Teachers 1,500.00
Project 3M February Fund
enrolment campaign
(Masayang
by 2%
Mag-aral sa  School
additional
Malioer ES) Conduct Child Head May-June MOOE
learners Child Mapping 1,000.00
Mapping  Teachers Fund

School Improvement Plan

14
SCHOOL
BUDGET
IMPROVEMEN PROJECT OUTPUT FOR THE PERSON(S) SCHEDULE/ BUDGET
ACTIVITIES PER
T PROJECT OBJECTIVE YEAR RESPONSIBLE VENUE SOURCE
ACTIVITY
TITLE

Baseline/Endline Conduct  School

Nutritional Status School-Based Head September- SBFP
Report  Teachers 162,000
Feeding December Fund
Program  PTA
Officers
To reduce  School January-
Conduct Self- Head
Project the no. of Nutritional Status March Canteen
Help Feeding  Teachers 2,100
“Malusog na learners who Report Fund
Program  PTA
Kabataan, are wasted
Malusog na and severely Officers
 School
Paaralan” wasted from Conduct of
No. of Dewormed Head February &
15% to 5% Deworming 2,100 SDO Fund
Learners  Teachers August
Activity  District
Nurse
Handwashing of Classroom  School June- MOOE
pupils before and Handwashing Head 1,500
March Fund
after recess Activity  Teachers
Conduct
 School
Reading
Head June (Pre)
 PHIL-IRI Results Inventory  English MOOE
February 4,500
 Reading Pieces Test/PHIL-IRI Coordinato Fund
(Post)
(Pre & Post r
Test)  Teachers
Construct Big  School
books, Dolch Head
 English June- MOOE
Visual Products charts and 5,000
Coordinato December Fund
other reading
materials r
Project READ
To improve  Teachers
(Reading
the reading  School
Enhancement
level of Conduct Head
Advocacy and  Training Matrix  English
pupils by 5% Beginning
Development)  IPD Result Coordinato June- MOOE
Reading 6,000
 No. of teachers r March Fund
INSET/Group
trained Sessions/ELLN  ELLN
Facilitator
 Teachers
Conduct
Reading
 School
 List of Sessions Head June-
None None
References
 Remedial  Teachers March
 Progress Reports
Reading
 Peer
Teaching/

School Improvement Plan

15
SCHOOL
BUDGET
IMPROVEMEN PROJECT OUTPUT FOR THE PERSON(S) SCHEDULE/ BUDGET
ACTIVITIES PER
T PROJECT OBJECTIVE YEAR RESPONSIBLE VENUE SOURCE
ACTIVITY
TITLE

Tutoring

 Functional  School
Institutionalize June
Reading Corner Head
Classroom None None
 List of Books  Teachers
Reading Corner
 Log Sheet
Enrollment of
teachers to the
Learning
Created account of Resources Teachers May
teachers in LRMDS Management None None
Portal and
To provide
Development
Project PALM enough
System
(Pupils’ Learners’
(LRMDS)
Additional Materials to
Learning be used by Downloading of June-
Downloaded Teachers
Materials) Grade 6 Learners’ March MOOE
LRMDS LMs for all 1,000
pupils Materials from Fund
learning areas
LRMDS Portal

Conduct School  School

No. of prepared Learning Action Head MOOE
October 5,000
IMs Cell (SLAC) on  Teachers Fund
IM Preparation

Individual IDP Identifying

teachers’ Teachers May
results None None
competence &
To capacitate
skills
Project PLDT teachers
(Professional through Attend school,
Learning and attendance district,
Development to In-Service division,
Certificate/ June-
of Teachers) Trainings regional, Teachers MOOE
Attendance to March 10,000
national and Fund
Trainings
international
training
workshop

Project 3S To  Notice of Invite all  School June-May 10,000 PTA Fund

(Stronger strengthen Meetings stakeholders to Head
Stakeholders’ school &  Attendance to participate in  Teachers
Support) community various school various school  PTA
partnership program and programs and
from 65% to activities activities
85%  Certificate of
Appreciation

School Improvement Plan

16
SCHOOL
BUDGET
IMPROVEMEN PROJECT OUTPUT FOR THE PERSON(S) SCHEDULE/ BUDGET
ACTIVITIES PER
T PROJECT OBJECTIVE YEAR RESPONSIBLE VENUE SOURCE
ACTIVITY
TITLE

To improve
the school’s
quality  Quality Conduct  School
Project SMP Head December-
management Procedures procedures
(Speedy
system  Quality Forms align to Quality  Teachers February 40,000.0 MOOE
Management  Certificate/ 0 Fund/SEF
which will Management
of Processes) Attendance to
fast track System
office Trainings
transactions

 School
12 SMART/LED Procurement of Head MOOE
May-
televisions for all SMART/LED  Teachers 35,000 Fund/PTA
October
grade levels televisions  PTA Fund
To enrich
learners’
access to Construction of  School
Project EBES Functional study
education 2 study sheds Head
(Enhanced sheds and
with and acquisition  Teachers June-July 25,000 PTA Fund
Basic Education benches/garden
enhanced benches/garden  PTA
Services) set
learning and set
child-friendly
 School
environment
Functional school Rehabilitation Head MOOE
garden/Gulayaan of school  Teachers April-May 10,000 Fund/PTA
sa Paaralan garden  PTA Fund

School Improvement Plan

17
 Table 15. Annual Implementation Plan for S.Y. 2020-2021

SCHOOL
BUDGET
IMPROVEMEN PROJECT OUTPUT FOR THE PERSON(S) SCHEDULE/ BUDGET
ACTIVITIES PER
T PROJECT OBJECTIVE YEAR RESPONSIBLE VENUE SOURCE
ACTIVITY
TITLE

Intensify  School
To increase January- MOOE
Project 3M Early Registration enrolment Head 1,500.00
enrolment February Fund
(Masayang campaign  Teachers
by 2%
Mag-aral sa
Malioer ES)
additional Conduct Child  School May-June MOOE
learners Child Mapping Head 1,000.00
Mapping Fund
 Teachers
Baseline/Endline Conduct  School
Nutritional Status School-Based Head September- SBFP
Report  Teachers 162,000
Feeding December Fund
Program  PTA
Officers
To reduce  School January-
Conduct Self- Head
Project the no. of Nutritional Status March Canteen
Help Feeding  Teachers 2,100
“Malusog na learners who Report Fund
Program  PTA
Kabataan, are wasted
Malusog na and severely Officers
 School
Paaralan” wasted from Conduct of
No. of Dewormed Head February &
15% to 5% Deworming 2,100 SDO Fund
Learners  Teachers August
Activity  District
Nurse
Handwashing of Classroom  School MOOE
pupils before and Handwashing Head June-March 1,500
Fund
after recess Activity  Teachers
Project READ To improve Conduct
(Reading the reading Reading  School June (Pre)
Enhancement level of Inventory Head MOOE
 PHIL-IRI Results 4,500
Advocacy and pupils by 5% Test/PHIL-IRI  English February Fund
 Reading Pieces
Development) (Pre & Post Coordinator (Post)
Test)  Teachers

Construct Big
 School
books, Dolch Head June- MOOE
Visual Products charts and  English 5,000
December Fund
other reading Coordinator
materials  Teachers
 Training Matrix Conduct  School June-March 6,000 MOOE
 IPD Result Beginning Head Fund
 No. of teachers Reading  English
trained INSET/Group Coordinator
Sessions/ELLN  ELLN
Facilitator
 Teachers

School Improvement Plan

18
SCHOOL
BUDGET
IMPROVEMEN PROJECT OUTPUT FOR THE PERSON(S) SCHEDULE/ BUDGET
ACTIVITIES PER
T PROJECT OBJECTIVE YEAR RESPONSIBLE VENUE SOURCE
ACTIVITY
TITLE

Conduct
Reading
Sessions  School
 List of Head
 Remedial June-March None None
References  Teachers
Reading
 Progress Reports
 Peer
Teaching/
Tutoring

 Functional  School
Institutionalize June
Reading Corner Head
Classroom None None
 List of Books  Teachers
Reading Corner
 Log Sheet
Enrollment of
teachers to the
Learning
Resources
Created account of Management Teachers May
teachers in LRMDS and None None
Portal Development
To provide System
Project PALM enough (LRMDS)
(Pupils’ Learners’
Additional Materials to
Learning be used by Downloading of
Materials) Grade 6 Downloaded Learners’
Teachers June-March MOOE
pupils LRMDS LMs for all Materials from 1,000
LRMDS Portal Fund
learning areas

Conduct School  School

No. of prepared Learning Action Head MOOE
October 5,000
IMs Cell (SLAC) on  Teachers Fund
IM Preparation

Project PLDT To capacitate Identifying

Individual IDP
(Professional teachers teachers’ Teachers May 2019
results None None
Learning and through competence &
Development attendance skills
of Teachers) to In-Service
Trainings Certificate/ Attend school, Teachers June-March 10,000 MOOE
Attendance to district, Fund
Trainings division,
regional,
national and
international

School Improvement Plan

18
SCHOOL
BUDGET
IMPROVEMEN PROJECT OUTPUT FOR THE PERSON(S) SCHEDULE/ BUDGET
ACTIVITIES PER
T PROJECT OBJECTIVE YEAR RESPONSIBLE VENUE SOURCE
ACTIVITY
TITLE

training
workshop

 Notice of
To Meetings
Invite all
strengthen  Attendance to  School
Project 3S stakeholders to
school & various school Head
(Stronger participate in
community program and  Teachers June-May 10,000 PTA Fund
Stakeholders’ various school
partnership activities  PTA
Support)  Certificate of programs and
from 65% to
Appreciation activities
85%

To improve
the school’s
quality  Quality Conduct  School
Project SMP Head December-
management Procedures procedures
(Speedy
system  Quality Forms align to Quality  Teachers February 40,000.00
MOOE
Management  Certificate/ Fund/SEF
which will Management
of Processes) Attendance to
fast track System
office Trainings
transactions

 School
12 SMART/LED Procurement of Head MOOE
televisions for all SMART/LED  Teachers May-October 35,000 Fund/PTA
grade levels televisions  PTA Fund
To enrich
learners’
Project EBES
access to
Functional study
Construction of  School
education 2 study sheds Head
(Enhanced sheds and
with and acquisition  Teachers June-July 25,000 PTA Fund
Basic Education benches/garden
enhanced benches/garde  PTA
Services) set
learning and n set
child-friendly
 School
environment
Functional school Rehabilitation Head MOOE
garden/Gulayaan of school  Teachers April-May 10,000 Fund/PTA
sa Paaralan garden  PTA Fund

School Improvement Plan

18
 Table 16. Annual Implementation Plan for S.Y. 2021-2022

SCHOOL
BUDGET
IMPROVEMEN PROJECT OUTPUT FOR THE PERSON(S) SCHEDULE/ BUDGET
ACTIVITIES PER
T PROJECT OBJECTIVE YEAR RESPONSIBLE VENUE SOURCE
ACTIVITY
TITLE

To increase
Project 3M
enrolment Intensify
(Masayang  School January- MOOE
by 2% Early Registration enrolment Head 1,500.00
Mag-aral sa February Fund
additional campaign  Teachers
Malioer ES)
learners

Baseline/Endline  School
Nutritional Status Conduct School- Head September- SBFP
Report Based Feeding  Teachers 162,000
December Fund
Program  PTA
Officers
 School January-
Conduct Self- Head
To reduce Nutritional Status March Canteen
Help Feeding  Teachers 2,100
Project the no. of Report Fund
Program  PTA
“Malusog na learners who
Kabataan, are wasted Officers
Malusog na and severely  School
Conduct of Head
Paaralan” wasted from No. of Dewormed February &
Deworming  Teachers 2,100 SDO Fund
15% to 5% Learners August
Activity  District
Nurse
Classroom
Handwashing of Handwashing  School MOOE
pupils before and Activity Head June-March 1,500
Fund
after recess  Teachers

Conduct
 School
Reading June (Pre)
Head
 PHIL-IRI Results Inventory  English MOOE
February 4,500
 Reading Pieces Test/PHIL-IRI Coordinato Fund
(Pre & Post (Post)
r
Project READ Test)  Teachers
To improve
(Reading
the reading Conduct
Enhancement
level of Reading
Advocacy and
pupils by 5% Sessions  School
Development)
 List of Head
 Remedial June-March None None
References  Teachers
Reading
 Progress Reports
 Peer
Teaching/
Tutoring

School Improvement Plan

23
SCHOOL
BUDGET
IMPROVEMEN PROJECT OUTPUT FOR THE PERSON(S) SCHEDULE/ BUDGET
ACTIVITIES PER
T PROJECT OBJECTIVE YEAR RESPONSIBLE VENUE SOURCE
ACTIVITY
TITLE

Individual IDP Identifying

teachers’ Teachers May
results None None
To capacitate competence &
Project PLDT teachers skills
(Professional through
attendance Attend school,
Learning and
to In-Service district, division,
Development
Trainings Certificate/ regional, Teachers June-March
of Teachers) MOOE
Attendance to national and 10,000
Fund
Trainings international
training
workshop

 Notice of
To
Meetings Invite all
Project 3S
strengthen
 Attendance to stakeholders to  School
school & Head June-May
(Stronger various school participate in
community program and  Teachers 10,000 PTA Fund
Stakeholders’ various school
partnership activities  PTA
Support) programs and
from 65% to  Certificate of activities
85% Appreciation

Construction of
Functional
To enrich handwashing  School MOOE
learners’ handwashing and Head
and April-May 25,000 Fund/PTA
access to toothbrushing  Teachers
Project EBES toothbrushing Fund
education facility  PTA
(Enhanced facility
with
Basic Education Window grating  School
enhanced
Services) Secured rooms for of rooms for Head MOOE
learning and
child-friendly canteen/feeding canteen/feeding  Teachers April-May 25,000 Fund/PTA
environment and Grade 3 class and Grade 3  PTA Fund
class

Repainting of
Beautified school School MOOE
plant boxes and Head April-May 25,000
surroundings Fund
other structures

 School MOOE
Functional Construction of Head April-May 15,000 Fund/PTA
herbarium herbarium  Teachers Fund
 PTA

School Improvement Plan

23
 CHAPTER 4
Monitoring and Evaluation C
H
Depending on the timelines set by the Project Team in their project designs, the SPT will
monitor progress at the middle and end of the implementation period. For longer projects,
A
the SPT will have to monitor more than twice using the Project Monitoring Form (PMRF). P
This will help the Project Team to inform the SPT of the status of their projects. In return, the
SPT will guide and help the Project Teams in resolving problems especially during the early
T
stage of the project implementation. Both the SPT and the Project Team will discuss the E
Recommendations/Action Points based on the results of the monitoring done by the SPT. R
Table 17. Project Monitoring Report Form
4
Scheduled Dates of Monitoring
Mid-year: __________________________ Year-end: ___________________________

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)

NAME OF THE PROJECT DATE ACCOMPLISH- ISSUES/ RECCOMENDATIONS/ SIGNATURE
PROJECT OBJECTIVES OF MENTS/ PROBLEMS/ ACTION POINTS OF SPT AND
AND MONITORING STATUS TO CHALLENGES PROJECT
TARGETS DATE TEAM
LEADER
Project 3M To
(Masayang increase
Mag-aral sa enrolment
Malioer ES) by 2%
additional
learners
To reduce
the no. of
Project
learners
“Malusog na
who are
Kabataan,
wasted and
Malusog na
severely
Paaralan”
wasted from
15% to 5%
Project READ To improve
(Reading the reading
Enhancement level of
Advocacy and pupils by 5%
Development)
Project PALM To provide
(Pupils’ enough
Additional Learners’
Learning Materials to
Materials) be used by
Grade 6
pupils
Project PLDT To
(Professional capacitate
Learning and teachers
Development through
of Teachers) attendance
to In-Service
Trainings
To
strengthen
Project 3S school &
(Stronger community
Stakeholders’ partnership
Support) from 65% to
85%

Project SMP To
(Speedy improve the
Management school’s
of Processes) quality
manage-
ment
system
which will
fast track
office
transactions

Project EBES To enrich

(Enhanced learners’
Basic access to
Education education
Services) with
enhanced
learning and
child-
friendly
environ-
ment

Prepared by:

RHIAN V. CALANGIAN ERNA P. GARCIA SHERYL C. PADUA

Student Representative Parent Representative Teacher Representative

LOYD M. PALISOC BELINDA V. CALANGIAN MARIO E. PALISOC JR.

Brgy. LGU Representative SCPC Member BDRRMC Member

ROBERT P. REBAMONTAN
Principal I
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region ______
 DIVISION ____________________

awards this

Certificate of Acceptance
to

(NAME OF SCHOOL)
for having successfully complied and met the requirements
and standards
of the Department of Education as mandated by DepEd Order
44, s. 2015.

Given on the ______ day of __________________ 201____.

Schools Division Superintendent