Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data

CHAPTER 4
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents and interprets the data gathered from the evaluation in the
selected carinderias in ________ about the different practices to avoid the food waste.
Table 4.0 Scaling Method

Range Description
Strongly Agree (SA) 3.26-4.00 The respondents fully
believe that their practices
help in avoiding food
waste.
Agree (A) 2.51-3.25 The respondents believe
that their practices help in
avoiding food waste.
Disagree (D) 1.76-2.50 The respondents don’t
believe that their practices
waste.
Strongly Disagree (SD) 1.00-1.75 The respondents fully
reject that their practices
waste.
Question 1 What is the demographic profile of the respondents according to?

4.1.1. Sex
Sex Frequency (f) Percentage (%)
Female 17 58.62%
Male 12 41.38%
Total 29 100%
The table 4.1.1 shows the percentage of male and female of the respondents,
the table show that 58.62% are female and 41.38% are male.
The data above shows the highest number of respondents are Female with 17 on
its frequency and the lowest number are male with 12 frequency.
4.1.2 Age
Age Bracket Frequency (f) Percentage (%)
21-30 yrs. Old 7 24.14%
31-40 yrs. Old 7 24.14%
41-50 yrs. Old 11 37.93%
51-60 yrs. Old 4 13.79%
61+ yrs. Old 0 0.00%
Total 29 100 %
The table 4.1.2 shows the percentage of Age Bracket of the respondents, the
table show that 21-30 years old has a percentage of 24.14% with a frequency of 7, 31-
40 years old has a percentage of 24.14% with a frequency of 7, 41-50 years old has a
percentage of 37.93% with a frequency of 11, 51-60 years old has a percentage of
13.79% with a frequency of 4 and 61 years old and above has a 0% with a frequency of
0
The data above shows the highest number of respondents are from the age of
41-50 years old with a frequency of 11 and the lowest number are from 61 years old
and above with a frequency of 0.
Question 2 Which among the selected practices got the highest rate from the
respondents in terms of?
a. sex
b. age
4.2.1 Sex (Female)

FEMALE
Practices SA A D SD rate in terms
Score Scores Score Score of 4
s in 4 in 3 s in 2 s in 1
1. Sa mga practice ko, 40 21 0 0 3.59
napapatagal ko ang pagkaing
inaahin ko bago mapanis.
(These practices help me to
maximize the shelf life of the
food I serve.)
2. Nakakatulong ang mga
practice ko sa matinong
paggamit ng mga sobrang
pagkain sa carinderia. (These
practices help me in properly
using the excess food in my
carinderia.) 40 21 0 0 3.59
3. Dahil sa mga practice ko,
nagiging mas competitive ang
carinderia ko, at
nababawasan ang
nasasayang na pagkain.
(These practices increase the
competitiveness of my
carinderia, while decreasing
the food waste that I make.) 24 27 4 0 3.24
practice ko sa
pagmamaximize ng pagkaing
niluluto ko. (These practices
help me in maximizing the use
of the food I cook.) 28 18 8 0 3.18
practice ko sa tamang
paggamit ng mga nasayang
na pagkain. (These practices
make me engage in proper
food waste management.) 4 21 18 0 2.53
practice ko sa pag-iwas sa
labis na supply ng pagkain.
(These practices help me in
avoiding oversupply of food.) 28 15 8 1 3.06
pagluluto ng labis na pagkain.
avoiding overproduction of
food.) 4 6 20 4 2.00
8. Nakakatulong ang mga 8 21 14 1 2.59
practice ko sa pagiging mas
matipid sa mga gamit at mga
sangkap sa karinderia. (These
practices help me in being
more efficient in the resources
I use in the Carinderia.)
practice ko sa paggawa ng
mga plano na nakakaambag
sa pag-iwas sa pag-aksaya ng
pagkain, at nakakatulong sa
pagtitipid. (These practices
help me in generating a
proper plan that assists to
avoiding food waste and help
me in saving money.) 16 9 14 3 2.47
10. Lagi kong ihinihiwalay ang
mga tira-tira ng mga
customers ko para sa pagkain
ng hayop, composting, atbp. (I
always segregate my
customers' leftovers in feeds
for animals, and for
composting, etc.) 40 15 4 0 3.47
madalas kong nagagamit ang
mga tirang pagkain ng mga
customer sa pagcocompost o
pagpapakain ng mga hayop.
(Because of these practices, I
can often use my customers’
leftovers as compost or feeds
for animals.) 44 15 2 0 3.59
practice ko sa pagpapanatili
ng dekalidad na pagkain.
maintaining high quality food.) 12 21 14 0 2.76
practice ko sa pagpapadami
ng mga taong bumibili sa
carinderia ko upang walang
maaksayang pagkain. (These
practices help to increase the
amount of customers buying
in my carinderia so that there
is no food wasted.) 28 18 6 1 3.12
practice ko sa pagpapababa
ng mga presyo ng pagkain
para mabawasan ang
naaaksayang pagkain. (These
practices help to decrease
prices of the foods to avoid
food waste.)
paggamit ng mga gamit sa
kusina para maiwasan ang
mga negatibong puna. (These
practices help to exhibit
proper usage of the cookware
to avoid negative feedback.) 8 15 20 0 2.53
pagdadala ng pagkain kapag
ito’y ihahain na. (These
practices help to perform
proper food handling when its
ready to serve.) 12 30 8 0 2.94
ng kalinisan ng carinderia
upang makaakit ng mas
maraming customer. (These
practices help to maintain the
cleanliness of the carinderias
to attract more customers.) 28 27 2 0 3.35
practice ko sa pagtuklas ng
mga diskarte upang
magkaroon ng mga suki.
(These practices help in
discovering strategies to have
habitue customers.) 28 21 6 0 3.24
practice ko sa pagbibigay ng
magandang ambiance sa
aking carinderia upang
makaakit ng mga customer.
giving a better ambiance in
my carinderia to attract more
customers.) 52 9 2 0 3.71
mga diskarte ng mga
competitor, at sa pag-asenso
ng aking negosyo. (These
practices help me in figuring
out my competitor’s practices
that made them successful
and in applying them to my
business to improve sales. )
The table shows the mean scores of all female respondents of each selected
practice in avoiding food waste among selected Carinderias in Brgy. Anabu 1-C, 1-E, 1-
F and 2-B in Imus city.
As the data gathered, the highest rate or with the highest mean score from
female respondents among the different practices is practice number 19 (These
practices help me in avoiding overproduction of food.) with a mean score of 3.71 which
mean that the respondents fully believe that their practices help in avoiding food waste.
4.2.2 Sex (Male)

MALE
1. Sa mga practice ko,
food I serve.) 28 15 0 0 3.58
carinderia.) 28 9 4 0 3.42
3. Dahil sa mga practice ko, 28 12 2 0 3.50
carinderia ko, at
nababawasan ang
the food waste that I make.)
practice ko sa
food.) 0 6 10 5 1.75
I use in the Carinderia.) 12 12 10 0 2.83
10. Lagi kong ihinihiwalay ang 24 15 2 0 3.42
always segregate my
composting, etc.)
for animals.) 32 12 0 0 3.67
para mabawasan ang
food waste.) 24 12 4 0 3.33
ready to serve.)
mga diskarte upang
customers.) 44 3 0 0 3.92
mga diskarte ng mga
business to improve sales. ) 16 21 0 1 3.17
The table shows the mean scores of all male respondents of each selected
As the data gathered, the highest rate or with the highest mean score from male
respondents among the different practices is practice number 19 (These practices help
me in avoiding overproduction of food.) with a mean score of 3.92 which mean that the
respondents fully believe that their practices help in avoiding food waste.
Table 4.2.3 Age Bracket 21-30 years old
AGE 21-30 YEARS OLD

food I serve.) 8 15 0 0 3.29
carinderia.) 12 12 0 0 3.43
carinderia ko, at
nababawasan ang
practice ko sa
food.) 0 6 6 2 2.00
always segregate my
for animals.) 12 12 0 0 3.43
maintaining high quality food.)
para mabawasan ang
food waste.) 8 9 4 0 3.00
ready to serve.) 4 9 6 0 2.71
mga diskarte upang
habitue customers.)
customers.) 24 3 0 0 3.86
mga diskarte ng mga
The table shows the mean scores of all 21-30 years old respondents of each
selected practice in avoiding food waste among selected Carinderias in Brgy. Anabu 1-
C, 1-E, 1-F and 2-B in Imus city.
As the data gathered, the highest rate or with the highest mean score from 21-30
years old respondents among the different practices is practice number 19 (These
mean that the respondents fully believe that their practices help in avoiding food waste.

AGE 31-40 YEARS OLD
food I serve.)
carinderia.) 24 3 0 0 3.86
carinderia ko, at
nababawasan ang
practice ko sa
food.) 0 3 12 0 2.14
always segregate my
for animals.) 20 6 0 0 3.71
para mabawasan ang
food waste.)
mga diskarte upang
customers.) 20 3 2 0 3.57
mga diskarte ng mga
practices help me in properly using the excess food in my carinderia.) with a mean
score of 3.86 which mean that the respondents fully believe that their practices help in

AGE 41-50 YEARS OLD
food I serve.)
carinderia.)
carinderia ko, at
nababawasan ang
practice ko sa
of the food I cook.)
food waste management.)
avoiding oversupply of food.)
food.)
me in saving money.)
always segregate my
composting, etc.)
for animals.)
is no food wasted.)
para mabawasan ang
food waste.)
to avoid negative feedback.)
ready to serve.)
to attract more customers.)
mga diskarte upang
habitue customers.)
customers.)
mga diskarte ng mga
practices help in giving a better ambiance in my carinderia to attract more customers.)
with a mean score of 3.91 which mean that the respondents fully believe that their
practices help in avoiding food waste.

AGE 51-60 YEARS OLD
food I serve.)
carinderia.)
carinderia ko, at
nababawasan ang
practice ko sa
food.)
always segregate my
composting, etc.)
for animals.)
is no food wasted.)
para mabawasan ang
food waste.)
ready to serve.)
mga diskarte upang
habitue customers.)
customers.)
mga diskarte ng mga
practices help me to maximize the shelf life of the food I serve.), 2 (These practices
help me in properly using the excess food in my carinderia.), 11 (Because of these
practices, I can often use my customers’ leftovers as compost or feeds for animals.), 12
(These practices help me in maintaining high quality food.), 17 (These practices help to
maintain the cleanliness of the carinderias to attract more customers.), 18 (These
practices help in discovering strategies to have habitue customers.), 19 (These
practices help in giving a better ambiance in my carinderia to attract more customers.),
20 (These practices help me in figuring out my competitor’s practices that made them
successful and in applying them to my business to improve sales. ) with a mean score
of 3.75 which mean that the respondents fully believe that their practices help in
Question 3 Which among the selected practices got the lowest rate from the
respondents in terms of?
a. sex
b. age
Table 4.3.1 (FEMALE)
FEMALE
food I serve.) 40 21 0 0 3.59
carinderia.) 40 21 0 0 3.59
carinderia ko, at
nababawasan ang
practice ko sa
food.) 4 6 20 4 2.00
always segregate my
for animals.)
para mabawasan ang
food waste.) 32 21 4 0 3.35
ready to serve.) 12 30 8 0 2.94
mga diskarte upang
customers.) 52 9 2 0 3.71
mga diskarte ng mga
The table shows the mean scores of all female respondents of each selected
As the data gathered, the least rate or with the least mean score from female
respondents don’t believe that their practices help in avoiding food waste.
Table 4.3.2 (MALE)
MALE
food I serve.) 28 15 0 0 3.58
carinderia.) 28 9 4 0 3.42
carinderia ko, at
nababawasan ang
practice ko sa
food.)
always segregate my
for animals.) 32 12 0 0 3.67
is no food wasted.)
para mabawasan ang
food waste.) 24 12 4 0 3.33
mga diskarte upang
customers.)
mga diskarte ng mga
The table shows the mean scores of all male respondents of each selected
As the data gathered, the least rate or with the least mean score from male
respondents fully reject that their practices help in avoiding food waste.
AGE 21-30 YEARS OLD
food I serve.) 8 15 0 0 3.29
carinderia.) 12 12 0 0 3.43
carinderia ko, at
nababawasan ang
practice ko sa
food.) 0 6 6 2 2.00
always segregate my
for animals.) 12 12 0 0 3.43
para mabawasan ang
food waste.) 8 9 4 0 3.00
mga diskarte upang
customers.) 24 3 0 0 3.86
mga diskarte ng mga
As the data gathered, the lowest rate or with the least mean score from 21-30
mean that the respondents don’t believe that their practices help in avoiding food waste.

AGE 31-40 YEARS OLD
food I serve.) 20 6 0 0 3.71
carinderia.) 24 3 0 0 3.86
carinderia ko, at
nababawasan ang
practice ko sa
food.) 0 3 12 0 2.14
always segregate my
for animals.)
para mabawasan ang
food waste.) 16 9 0 0 3.57
mga diskarte upang
customers.) 20 3 2 0 3.57
mga diskarte ng mga
As the data gathered, the lowest rate or with the least mean score from 31-40
years old respondents among the different practices are practice number 7 (These
practices help me in avoiding overproduction of food.) and practice number 9 (These
practices help me in generating a proper plan that assists to avoiding food waste and
help me in saving money.) with a mean score of 2.14 which mean that the respondents
fully believe that their practices help in avoiding food waste.

AGE 41-50 YEARS OLD
food I serve.)
carinderia.)
carinderia ko, at
nababawasan ang
practice ko sa
food.)
always segregate my
composting, etc.)
for animals.)
is no food wasted.)
para mabawasan ang
food waste.)
ready to serve.)
mga diskarte upang
habitue customers.)
customers.)
mga diskarte ng mga
As the data gathered, the lowest rate or with the lowest mean score from 41-50
mean that the respondents fully reject that their practices help in avoiding food waste.

AGE 51-60 YEARS OLD
food I serve.)
carinderia.)
carinderia ko, at
nababawasan ang
practice ko sa
food.)
always segregate my
composting, etc.)
for animals.)
is no food wasted.)
para mabawasan ang
food waste.)
ready to serve.)
mga diskarte upang
habitue customers.)
customers.)
mga diskarte ng mga
As the data gathered, the lowest rate or with the lowest mean score from 51-60
years old respondents among the different practices are practice number 5 (These
practices make me engage in proper food waste management.) and practice number 7
(These practices help me in avoiding overproduction of food.) with a mean score of 2.25
which mean that the respondents don’t believe that their practices help in avoiding food
waste.
Question 4 Is there a significant difference in the evaluation of selected practices to

avoid food waste in terms of?
1.1 Age
1.2 Sex
Table 4.4.1 Sex (Male/Female)
As the data gathered, the overall mean score for male is 3.1083 with a verbal
interpretation of agreed which means that all male respondents believe that their
practices help in avoiding food waste, while the overall mean score for female is 3.0824
with a verbal interpretation of agreed which means that all female respondents believe
that their practices help in avoiding food waste.
Table 4.4.2 Test of Homogeneity of Variances in terms of Sex (Male/Female)
The significant level in the test of homogeneity is 0.771 and the P value is > 0.05,
therefore the homogeneity of variance has no statistically significant difference. The
data shows an almost equal variance.
Table 4.4.3 Analysis of Variance in terms of Sex (Male/Female)
The significant level in the ANOVA is 0.827 and the P value is > 0.05, therefore
there is no evidence against the null hypothesis (there is no statistically significant
difference in the evaluation of selected practices to avoid food waste in terms of sex).
Data appears consistent with null hypothesis means it fails to reject the null hypothesis.
Table 4.4.4 Age Bracket

As the data gathered, the overall mean score for 21-30 years old respondents is
3.0000 with a verbal interpretation of agreed which means that all respondents in this
age bracket believe that their practices help in avoiding food waste, the overall mean
score for 31-40 years old respondents is 3.1214 with a verbal interpretation of agreed
which means that all respondents in this age bracket believe that their practices help in
avoiding food waste, the overall mean score for 41-50 years old respondents is 3.0636
with a verbal interpretation of agreed which means that all respondents in this age
bracket believed that their practices help in avoiding food waste, the overall mean score
for 51-60 years old respondents is 3.2875 with a verbal interpretation of strongly agreed
which means that all respondents in this age bracket fully believe that their practices
help in avoiding food waste.
Table 4.4.5 Test of Homogeneity of variances in term of Age Bracket
The significant level in the test of homogeneity is 0.225 and the P value is > 0.05,
therefore the homogeneity of variance has no statistically significant difference. The
data shows an almost equal variance.
Table 4.4.6 Analysis of Variance in terms of Age Bracket

The significant level in the ANOVA is 0.515 and the P value is > 0.05, therefore
there is no evidence against the null hypothesis (there is no statistically significant
difference in the evaluation of selected practices to avoid food waste in terms of sex).
Data appears consistent with null hypothesis means it fails to reject the null hypothesis.

Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHAPTER 4

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

Table 4.0 Scaling Method

Question 1 What is the demographic profile of the respondents according to?

respondents in terms of?

4.2.1 Sex (Female)

4.2.2 Sex (Male)

Table 4.2.3 Age Bracket 21-30 years old

AGE 21-30 YEARS OLD

Table 4.2.4 Age Bracket 31-40 years old

Table 4.2.5 Age Bracket 41-50 years old

Table 4.2.6 Age Bracket 51-60 years old

respondents in terms of?

Table 4.3.1 (FEMALE)

Table 4.3.2 (MALE)

Table 4.3.4 Age Bracket 31-40 years old

Table 4.3.5 Age Bracket 41-50 years old

Table 4.2.6 Age Bracket 51-60 years old

Question 4 Is there a significant difference in the evaluation of selected practices to

Table 4.4.1 Sex (Male/Female)

Table 4.4.3 Analysis of Variance in terms of Sex (Male/Female)

Table 4.4.4 Age Bracket

Table 4.4.5 Test of Homogeneity of variances in term of Age Bracket

Table 4.4.6 Analysis of Variance in terms of Age Bracket

You might also like