Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BELAGAVI- 590018
BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING
IN
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
PROJECT ASSOCIATES
Name USN
1. H SHASHIKANTH 4BD17ME406
2. KARTHIK B R 4BD17ME408
3. MAHANTESH KODLI 4BD17ME412
4. S M VINAYAKA 4BD17ME422
Guide
T R MOHAN
Assistant Professor
2019 – 20
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
BAPUJI INISTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
SHAMANUR ROAD, DAVANGERE – 577004,
KARNATAKA
(Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University)
BAPUJI INISTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
SHAMANUR ROAD, DAVANGERE – 577004, KARNATAKA
(Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University)
CERTIFICATE
__________________
T R MOHAN
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
_________________ _________________
Dr. S KUMARAPPA Dr H.B. ARAVINDA M.E, Ph.D
Principal Principal
BIET, Davangere BIET, Davangere
We would like to express our gratitude to my Guide T.N Vijay Kumar for guiding in completing
the project work and for the continuous encouragement.
We would like to thank our beloved principal Dr M.C.Natarajafor constant support and
encouragement.
We also thankfully acknowledge the help received from the project work Co-ordinators T.N
Vijay Kumar and Ashoka. E for guiding us in the right way to complete the work according to
the university requirements.
Finally we would express my sincere thanks to all the teaching and non-teaching staff of the
department for providing all the necessary support and Families & friends, who have extended
their co-operation.
1. H SHASHIKANTH 4BD16ME406
2. KARTHIK B R 4BD16ME064
3. MAHANTESH KODLI 4BD16ME066
4. S M VINAYAKA 4BD16ME070
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1
1.1.Overview of composite...............................................................................................2
1.2.Classification of Composite........................................................................................3
LITERATURE REVIEW..............................................................................................................10
2.3 Methodology.............................................................................................................13
MATERIALS USED....................................................................................................................15
3.2 Materials...................................................................................................................15
3.3. CALCULATION.....................................................................................................20
EXPERIMENTATION.................................................................................................................25
5.2Advantages................................................................................................................42
5.3Applications...............................................................................................................42
CONCLUSION.............................................................................................................................43
REFERENCE:...............................................................................................................................44
BOOKS REFERENCE...................................................................................................45
LIST OF FIGURE
LIST OF TABLE
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, the hybrid polymer composites are widely used in automotive,
civil engineering and aerospace applications. However, for the laminated composites, the
inter laminar delamination is the main area of concern because it results are unacceptable
reduction of a material performances. The compositions modification in the inter laminar
fracture toughness of good performance composites, which are made hybrid composites.
Hybrid composites are the materials that are framed by joining distinctive strands (natural
or synthetic) and matrices together to shape a single structure of composite. Different
strategies to enhance their protection from delamination exists which adds generous cost
and unpredictability to the generation methods of the composite materials. Therefore, the
strategies to increase fracture toughness of those high performance composite materials
are essential in an order to use those materials in realistic applications.
The present trend is, the use of composites are high when compared with other
materials, and led to use for many design criteria required to make a components, out of
these materials. These composites are exhibit, a unique residences of attributable to their
orthotropic nature and also, the laminates had been made having special fiber
orientations, quantity fraction and stacking sequences making it obligatory to determine
mechanical properties or fracture toughness initially they can be used for any applications
.
The composites manufactured by the use of one form of fiber is referred to as pure
composites, and if two or extra fibers are used to creating composites they're known as
hybrid composite. For example Glass-Carbon, Glass-Kevlar Hybrid and so on, those kind
of mixture is offers an advantage of high strength at decrease value which can be used for
applications, that may be no longer possible by way of the use of the purely composites.
The main objective of this combination is derived better quality of constituent material
and these composites are exposed to delamination significantly. So the hybridization of
composite fibrous cloth is the key to designing new additives having proper strength at
relatively decrease cost. All composite structures in medium and excessive overall
performance applications, they may be vulnerable to numerous varieties of damages
along with delamination, fiber pullout, and matrix cracking, and many others.
Several materials are processed and fabricated and for that reason flaws are often
no longer completely avoidable. The life of flaws guidelines is in the direction of crack
propagation and fracture of substances. Composite structure in medium and high
performance applications, they're vulnerable to numerous kinds of damages, together with
the fiber pullout, delamination, and matrix cracking, and so on. One or more of these
damage modes are prompted due to the stress concentration, impact, fatigue, and creep.
An extensive wide variety of published studies had been interested to have a look at the
mechanical and thermal properties. However, because flaw-free substances are very
challenging to be manufactured and crack could be hosted during the service, appreciative
the crack resistance capability is consequently necessary. Respected toughness and crack-
stopping ability are predominately very important. Due to the increasing of demand, the
hybrid composites in various applications. It is envisaged that, the fracture toughness
hybrid composites are play a vital role over the coming years. It is known that, the epoxy
based hybrid composites are prone to be brittle fracture under mechanical loading
condition. Compared with the metals, the application of fracture mechanics conceptions is
quite in the developed phase. In the polymer area, the fracture toughness test is meant for
homogeneous materials are used to determine K.
The composite materials in nature has delivered in living things such as seaweeds,
bamboo, wood and human bone. Initially materials have appear with polymeric
reinforcement has been used in Babylonia around 4000-2000 B.C. The contained of
reinforcement bitumen or pitch. Around 3000 B.C suggestion from various sources
The particles are to be used for reinforcing fiber that contains the ceramics and
glass along with minor mineral debris, particles of metals inclusive of aluminum and
amorphous materials, together with polymers, and carbon black. The particles are once
using to increasing the matrix modulus and the decreases ductility of matrix. That is also
used to reduce the price of the composite. These reinforcement and matrixes are
commonly used materials to be economical and easy to handle.
The fibers amalgamation and matrix are generally called fiber reinforcement
composite. The reinforcement of fibers is served as strength and matrix binds all the
fibers together. Carbon/graphite fibers, beryllium carbide, beryllium oxides, aluminum
oxides, glass fibers and especially natural fibers etc. are the usually used fiber reinforcing
agents. Similarly epoxy, phenolic, polyester, polyurethane, polyetherethrketone (PEEK),
vinyl ester so on, are commonly used matrix materials. The PEEK is commonly used
resin and epoxy has greater bond and less contraction as compared with PEEK.
The composite materials which contain more than one layer with different
materials that are composed. This can be used to syndicate better characteristic of the
integral layers and attachment materials for the purpose of achieving more valuable
product. The properties that are to be heightening by using this lamination are strength,
stiffness, mild weight, wear resistance, corrosion resistance, thermal insulation and
acoustical insulation. Such assertions are represented through the examples bimetals, clad
As the name it indicates that these composite mainly consist of metallic matrixes
such as Al, Mg, Cu and Fe. There are many reasons or popularity of this metal matrix
composite, the most important of its property. The composites are benefits over strong
metals which includes the higher specific modulus and strength, better properties on the
expanded temp., and lower coefficient of thermal expansion.
Polymer matrix composites are precisely widespread because of their fewer price
and humble methods of fabrication. These may consist of polymer such as epoxy,
urethane and polyester and also small diameter of fibers like graphite, boron and aramids.
The stiffness and strength of these composite are particularly low as compare to metals.
These problems are overwhelmed by material are reinforced polymers. The overall effects
of these composites are grander with the singular, for example polymer/ceramic. Which
are having higher modulus than polymers but are not brittle like ceramics.
The applications of fiber reinforced polymer composite in the field of industrial and
commercial are so diverse and it’s incredible to list out all. We focus only on the some of
many structural application areas, which are aircraft, space, automotive and marine fields.
They can also use in electronic parts such as printed circuit boards, construction of
buildings like floor beams, built-up of furniture like chair springs, power industry in
transformer housing, oil industries like offshore oil platforms and the oil sucker rods used
in the lifting underground oil, in medical field the bone plates for fracture fixation,
implants, and the prosthetics and in some of the industrial components, such as step
ladders, oxygen tanks, and power transmission shafts. Potential use of fiber-reinforced
composites happens in various engineering turfs. Setting them to an actual use needs
suspicious design repetition and proper process development based on the appreciative of
their distinctive mechanical, physical and thermal features.
Failure of the materials due to the presence of crack takes not only in metals.
Composites are also susceptible to fracture type failure called inter laminar fracture. This
inter laminar fracture occurs in the presence of piles, voids, layers seoerate, and also some
defects are present between the layers. These types of defects provide the movement for
separation. This inter laminar fracture is most common mode of fracture in case of
composite materials specially laminated structure.
The results of tensile test that are applied to the material does not containing any
cracks are stress concentration such as brittle inclusion. When the cracks are present in
either of the surface cracks or inner one, and at low applied stresses failure may occurs.
This applied stress is very high near the crack because of zero area as theoretically. The
ductile materials are deformed locally for high stress and diminishing the tip of the crack
which may reduce the intensity of stress. In case of brittle material the propagation of
crack is along the stress region with slight deformation. Fractures in engineering materials
are categorized by fracture with flats surface while ductile fracture absorbs more energy
and brittle fractures absorbed small amount of energy. Fracture toughness is majority
depending on the quantity of electricity required to create a brand new surfaces. The
linear elastic fracture mechanics or LEFM and elastic plastic fracture mechanics or EPFM
are the predominant categories of fracture mechanics. The material behaviors elastically
at the region away from the crack tip in case of LEFM apart from small inelastic
deformation at the region at the crack tip.
Concerning the deformation of a crack, there exist three types of crack openings which
are shown in figure 1.3
Mode I fracture – Opening mode (a tensile stress normal to the plane of the
crack)
Mode II fracture– Sliding mode (a shear stress acting parallel to the plane of
the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)
Mode III fracture– Tearing mode (shear stress acting parallel to the plane of
the crack and parallel to the crack front)
LITERATURE REVIEW
The literature survey has been made on a particular focus on properties of
different hybrid composites. The brief summary of reviewed literature is given below.
K. Sabeel Ahmed et.al [2] has investigated on tensile, flexural, and interlaminar shear
properties of woven jute and jute-glass fabric reinforced polyester composites. In this
investigation, the effect of a hybridization of glass fiber and stacking sequence effect on
tensile, flexural and interlaminar shear characteristics of glass-woven fiber hybrid
composite is refered.
Ashik K P et.al [3] has studied on investigation of moisture absorption and mechanical
residences of glass/natural fiber strengthened polymer hybrid composites. The laminates
used for a look at became fabricated via hand layup method. Coir and glass fiber used as
reinforcement, and epoxy resin was used as matrix material.
K.J. Wonga et.al [5] has studied on fracture characterization of short bamboo fabric
reinforced polyester composites. Composites at fiber contents of 10 to 50, 30 to 50 and 30
to 60 volume % (an increment of ten volume %) for fibers at different lengths are studied.
The ASTM principles for fracture trial of composites are yet to be created and the
accessible standard for polymer is the main decision for fiber reinforced polymer
composites and was to be regularly adopted.
Manjunath G B et.al [7] published a paper on ANOVA and reaction surface system for
the enhancement of fracture toughness parameters on jute fabric-epoxy composites
utilizing SENB specimens. In this work, the fracture characteristic of jute fabric
strengthened epoxy composites was examined by Taguchi technique. Single Edge
notched bend test was led according to ASTM standards. In this work consolidating three
parameters like a/w ratio, width and thickness variation.
From the literature survey is found that, any work has been not carried out on the
evaluation of Fracture properties of E-glass/jute fabric hybrid composites. So, this
investigation was provides links to future scholars to Fracture properties of E-glass jute
fabric incorporation.
A study on the available literatures on natural fiber composite reveals that several
materials have been used as reinforcements. Hence the present research work is intended
to carry out possessing and characterization of jute reinforced polymer
This process is continued till required thickness of the final product is obtained,
care should not be distorted after the end of hand layup method and is kept in the
hydraulic press under the load about 24hours to 48hours under room temperature, then cut
the specimen according to our experiment dimension for different testing. This manual
method of layup may also be used for short fibers composites.
CHAPTER 3
MATERIALS USED
The experiments are conducted on the laminated composite material. The material
selection details, testing specimen preparation & the experiments on specimens have been
discussed in this chapter.
For the preparation of composite material selection is depending upon the following
factors.
3.2 Materials
The materials which have been selected for this present work as mentioned below.
The reinforcement material used in this work is Natural fiber because of impressive
mechanical properties show jute, E-glass. Together we have all are consider as
environmental aspects like waste prevention, waste recycling and also waste
management.
Jute fiber
E-Glass fiber
Epoxy Resin
Fly ash
The most important types of natural fibers used in composite materials are flax,
hemp, jute, kenaf, and sisal due to their properties and availability. Using jute fiber for
composites has many advantages. Firstly is has wood like characteristics as it is a bast
fiber. Jute has high specific properties, low density, less abrasive behaviour to the
processing equipment, good dimensional stability and harmlessness. Jute is renewable,
versatile, nonabrasive, porous, hydroscopic, visco-elastic, biodegradable, combustible,
and reactive. The fiber has a high aspect ratio, high strength to weight ratio, and has good
insulation properties. Jute textile is a low cost eco-friendly product and is abundantly
available, easy to transport.
The biodegradable and low priced jute products merge with the soil after using
providing nourishment to the soil. Being made of cellulose, on combustion, jute does not
generate toxic gases. Some might consider part of these properties as disadvantages, such
as biodegradable and combustible, but these features provide a means of predictable and
programmable disposal not easily achieved with other resources.
The Epoxy resin LapoxL-12 is used as a matrix material in this work with a
hardener used is K-6 because it is low viscosity room temperature curing hardener liquid.
This resin is a Non crystalline material at room temperature and it delivers well resistance
to alkali and adhesive property. The Hardener (K-6) used has curing agent. The mass %
of Hardener used in the ratio of 10:1 with the resin. Epoxy resin are made by retorting
epichlorohydrin with bis-phenol A, which is linear polymers cross-link, thermosetting
resins are reaction with hardeners.
Fly ash is a fine powder that is a byproduct of burning pulverized coal in electric
generation power plants. Fly ash is a pozzolan, a substance containing aluminous and
siliceous material that forms cement in the presence of water. When mixed with lime and
water, fly ash forms a compound similar to Portland cement.
Depending upon the source and composition of the coal being burned, the components of
fly ash vary considerably, but all fly ash includes substantial amounts of silicon
dioxide(SiO2)(both amorphous and crystalline) aluminiumoxide (Al2O3) and calcium
oxide (CaO), the main mineral compounds in coal-bearing rock strata.
3.3. CALCULATION
12 mm 39 34% 60% 6%
E-GLASS FIBER
Weight of each layer of a E-glass fiber(310*170) = 11.043gms.
JUTE FIBER
Weight of each layer of a Jute fiber(310*170) = 12.73 gm
DENSITY OF EPOXY
Density = Mass / Volume
= 26.66gm / 25 ml
= 1.006 gm/ cm3
DENSITY OF HARDNER
Density = Mass / Volume
= 32.91gm / 25 ml
= 1.31 gm/ cm3
Number of layers = 29
E-glass fiber = 15
Jute fiber = 14
Total weight of E-glass fiber = weight of each layer x Number of layer
= 11.043 x 15
= 165.64gms
= (345x100) / 34
=1014.70gms
= 551.64 gm
Hardener = (606.81x1)/11
= 55.16gm
Number of layers = 39
E-glass fiber =20
Jute fiber =19
Total weight of E-glass fiber = weight of each layer x Number of layer
= 11.043 x 20
= 220.86gms
CHAPTER 4
EXPERIMENTATION
W=30 a/ w B/ w B Dia of W1 2H
Hole
30 0.5 0.3 9 7.5 37.5 36
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, B.I.E.T, Davanagere Page 26
MODE I FRACTURE BEHAVIOR ON E- GLASS JUTE EPOXY HYBRID
COMPOSITE MATERIAL
30 0.5 0.4 12 7.5 37.5 36
All dimensions are in mm
The geometry of a Compact Tension specimen is shown in Fig 4.1. The specimens were
shaped into ASTM E833 specimen with a different thickness of 9mm and 12mm. The
precracks were using hack saw blade. The specimens were tested at a crosshead rate of
0.5 cm/min. Three specimens were cut from each thickness and a total of at least nine
specimens were tested for each reported value.
Specimens are tested by attaching them in between the cross head and the stationary base
of the machine using the mounting dowel pins and clevis, and then running the compact
tension model procedure for this experiment. The load on the sample is recorded by an a
interface model SM-100-38 force transducer mounted between the sample and the
crosshead. The range of the load cell output goes from 0-100lbf. This load cell has been
calibrated and features a rated accuracy of 0.25% F.S.
Capacity = 40 Tonnes
Motor HP = 3HP
Cut the materail as per the ASTM standards which include length- 37.5mm, width- 36mm
and thickness as per the 9mm.12mm
The measured KCRITI values decrease with specimen thickness until a plateau is reached; at
that point the toughness appears to be relatively insensitive to further increase in
thickness. This apparent asymptote in the toughness vs. thickness trend is designated by
the symbol KIC, and is referred to as “plane strain fracture toughness”. A K IC value is
purported to be a specimen-size–independent material property. In the past, the
decreasing trend in KCRITI with increasing thickness in Figure 1.5 was attributed to a
transition from plane stress to plane strain at the crack tip.
The magnitude of K depends on sample geometry, the size and location of the
crack, and the magnitude and the modal distribution of loads on the material.In other
words, Stress Intensity Factor (K) is a factor which elegantly characterizes a crack.
P a
KIc= B √ W f × w
………………… EQ
(01)
a
For a CT specimen, the geometry factor, f × w is given by,
a
2+
a 2 a 3 4
a w a a
f( )
w
=
a
3 [
× 0.886+ 4.64
w
−13.32
w ( )
+14.72
w ( )
−5.60
w ( ) ( )]
[ ]
1− 2
w
………………… EQ
(02)
1. Load
2. Flow depth
3. Geometry
Where
a
2+
a 2 a 3 4
a W a a
f
W ( )
=
a
3 [
× 0.886+ 4.64 ( )
W
−13.32 ( )
W
+14.72
W ( )
−5.60
W ( )]
1−
W[ ] 2
a
2+
a 2 a 3 4
a W a a
f
W( )
=
a
3 [
× 0.886+ 4.64 ( )
W
−13.32( )
W
+14.72 ( )
W
−5.60
W ( )]
1−
W [ ] 2
a 2+0.5
f = x [0.866 + 4.66 ( 0.5 ) - 13.32 (0.5)2 + 14.72 (0.5)3 -
w (1−0.5)1.5
5.6 (0.5)4]
2.5
= X 1.356
0.3535
a
f = 9.659
w
CHAPTER 5
Mode-I Fracture toughness test for E-Glass, Jute fiber reinforced epoxy composite
was carried out as per ASTM standards. The table 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 shows experimental
results of Compact tension test for stacking sequence respectively.
Displacement in mm Load in N
0 0
0.1 76
0.5 125.03
1 127.97
1.5 148.66
2 196.81
2.5 262.52
3 265.07
3.5 390.99
4 539.85
4.5 757.36
5 887.2
5.5 897.01
Load in N
1000
900
800
700
600
Load in N
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Displacement in mm Load in N
0 0
0.1 15.69
0.5 14.51
1 17.85
1.5 18.63
2 21.18
2.5 29.33
3 55.52
3.5 99.72
4 153.04
4.5 304.31
5 547.47
5.5 644.55
6 749.12
6.3 770.87
6.4 792.3
6.9 245.2
Load in N
900
800
700
600
500 Load in N
400
300
200
100
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Displacement in mm Load in N
0 0
0.1 333.02
0.5 450.96
1 451.94
1.5 461.5
2 469.5
2.5 502.86
3 598.7
3.5 726.23
4 884.96
4.5 1038.88
5 1183.57
5.5 1320.62
6 1430.78
6.5 1493.67
6.7 1475.62
load in N
1600
1400
1200
1000
load in N
800
600
400
200
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
5.3Applications
CONCLUSION
Effect of stacking sequence on a Compact Tension, properties of glass fabric-jute fabric
reinforced hybrid composites, have been experimentally evaluated. The following
conclusions were drawn:-
1. The compact tension test the strength of the specimen with stacking sequence of
12mm, with 6%flyash gives a maximum value as compared to the other two
stacking sequences of the laminate.
2. The stacking sequence 12mm, with 6%flyashgives a maximum fracture toughness
of the specimen compared to other stacking sequences of the composite, because
it consist of glass as a outer layer
3. It shows a tension load on the specimen. The specimen 12mm, with 6%flyash
sequence gives better results compared to other specimens.
4. The fracture toughness is found to be in maximum for 12mm thickness 6% fly
ash.
5. The incorporation of the glass fiber in jute fiber composites enhances the
mechanical property and it leads to the increase of the utilization of natural fibers
in various applications.
REFERENCE:
[1]. R. Gujjala, S. Ojha, S. K. Acharya, and S. K. Pal, JCompos. studies on the
mechanical properties woven jute glass fiber reinforced composite, Journal of composite
materials Master 48, 3445 (2014).
[2]. S. D. Pandita, X. Yuan, M. A. Manan, C. H. Lau, A. S.Subramanian, and J. Wei, J.
Reinf. Plast. To study the details of modified filament winding the resin bath was
replaced with resin infection system Compos.33, 14(2014).
[3]. N. Venkateshwaran and A. Elayaperumal, Fiber. Polym. To study the mechanical and
water absorption behavior of banana and sisal reinforced hybrid composite 13, 907
(2012).
[4]. B. VijayaRamnath, S. JunaidKokan, R. Niranjan Raja, R.Sathyanarayanan,
c.Elanchezhian, A. RajendraPrasad,and V. M. Manickavasagam, evaluation of
mechanical properties of abaca-jute-glass fiber reinforced composite Mater. Des.,51, 357
(2013).
[5]. B. VijayaRamnath, V. M. Manickavasagam, C. Elanchezhian,C. Vinodh Krishna, S.
Karthik, and K. Saravanan, Investigation of flexural behavior of polymer composite
Mater.Des., 60, 643 (2014)
[6].B. VijayaRamnath, C. Elanchezhian, P. V. Nirmal, G. Prem Kumar, V. Santhosh
Kumar, S. Karthick, S. Rajesh,and K. Suresh, Investigation of mechanical behavior of
jute flax based glass fiber reinforced composite Fiber. Polym., 15, 1251 (2014).
[7]. J. Zhang, K. Chaisombat, S. He, and C. H. Wang, Mater.Des.,Evalution of
mechanical and wear performance of glass carbon reinforced composite . 36, 75 (2012).
[8]. C. Dong, H. A. Ranaweera-Jayawardena, and I. J. Davies,Compos.Flexure properties
of hybrid composite reinforced by S-2 glass and T700S carbon fibers. Pt.B-Eng., 43, 573
(2012).
[9]. J. Meredith, E. Bilson, R. Powe, E. Collings, and K.Kirwan, Compos. Struct., A
performance versus cost analysis of prereg carbon fiber epoxy energy absorption
structures 124, 206 (2015).
[10]. Khan, R.A.; Khan, M.A.; Zaman, H.U.; Pervin, S.; Khan, M.N.;Sultana, S.; Saha,
M.; Mustafa, A.I. Comparative studies of mechanicaland interfacial properties between
jute and E-glass fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. J. Reinfor. Plast.Compos.
2009, Published online 23 June.
BOOKS REFERENCE
[2]. ChittaranjanDeo and S.K. Acharya, Indian Journal of Engineering and Material
Sciences, Vol 17, 219-223, 2010
[3]. The first edition and second edition of "Composite Materials" by Deborah D. L.
Chung.