Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aquifer Characteristics
1. Aquifers
2. Water Table/Potentiometric Surface
▪ Confining layer
-13
▪ Geologic unit having little or no permeability (<9.869x10 m²)
▪ Groundwater will move through confining layers, but extremely slow
▪ Types of confining layers:
1) Aquifuge: absolutely impermeable (no transmission of water)
2) Aquitard: low permeability that can store water and transmit it slowly from one
aquifer to another (can be termed ‘leaky confining layer’)
-13
1 Darcy = 9.869x10 m²
Aquifers
Unconfined aquifer
▪ Unconfined aquifers are also called the ‘water table’ or ‘phreatic’ aquifers
▪ Continuous layers of high permeability from surface to aquifer base
▪ Recharge through downward seepage through the unsaturated zone
Perched aquifer
▪ Water intercepted by a
low-permeability layer in
the unsaturated zone
Aquifers
Springs
▪ Springs in different geologic settings
▪ Recharge/transmissivity ratio
Aquifers
Homogeneity and Isotropy
▪ Homogeneous: properties are the same at every point
▪ Heterogeneous: properties are different at every point
▪ Isotropic: properties are the same in every direction
▪ Anisotropic: properties are different in every direction
Homogeneous Heterogeneous
Kz
Kx
Anisotropic
Isotropic
Kz
Kx
Aquifers
Transmissivity
▪ Amount of water that can be transmitted horizontally through a unit
width by the full saturated thickness of the aquifer
T = bK
▪ Assumes flow through the aquifer to be horizontal. Is this always valid?
Aquifers
Effective Stress
▪ Total stress T : downward stress on plane by weight of overlying rock and water
ρ = wet density of soil
Weight of the column W = gbA b = thickness of column
T = gb
A = cross-sectional area of column
Total stress (W/A)
▪ Total stress is borne by two types of forces acting across the planar surface
T = e + P
Fitts (2012)
Column of soil supported by its base (left) and a close-up of the soil at the base (right). Two things support the
column: forces across grain-to-grain contacts (effective stress) and pressure in the pore water.
Aquifers
Effective Stress
▪ A change in total stress will also change the pressure and effective stress:
d T = d e + dP
▪ Since the weight of aquifer matrix materials in a column is approximately fixed,
changes in total stress ( d T ) are due to
▪ Pore water pressure changes ( dP ) in a confined aquifer do not change the
thickness of the saturated water body ->
d e = −dP
▪ Recalling definition of pressure head, we can relate changes in pressure to
changes in head:
dP
dh =
w g
−db / b0
=
d e
𝛼 = compressibility
db = change in aquifer thickness
b0 = original aquifer thickness
d𝜎e = change in effective stress
db dVt
▪ Vertical strain is equal to volume strain for 1D compression: =
b0 Vt 0
▪ We already know that Vt = Vv + Vs , so dVt = dVv + dVs
▪ It is safe to assume that the mineral solids are incompressible ( dVs 0 ), so
virtually all compression results from the void space ( dVt dVv )
Aquifers
Storage changes
▪ Changes in subsurface water storage:
▪ (1) Water in the pore spaces could expand or contract
▪ (2) Solid matrix could expand or contract
▪ (3) Fluctuating (raising or lowering) the water table
Aquifers
Storage changes – elastic
▪ Specific storage S s : amount of water per unit volume of a saturated
material that is stored or expelled from storage when the pore water is
subject to unit change in head
dV 1 dVw = volume of water expelled
▪ For a unit decline in head: Ss = − w Vt = aquifer volume
Vt dh dh = change in head
▪ Specific storage S s : Ss = −
dVw 1
Vt dh
becomes Ss = w g (n + )
Gaining stream.
Discharging gw from
both sides.
Waste
Pile
Water Table/Potentiometric Surface
Application to Field Study
▪ Former mining site in Sydney, Nova Scotia
May 2010
Nov 2016
Waste
Pile
Water Table/Potentiometric Surface
Application to Field Study
▪ Investigating groundwater flow regime
MW-10
MW-89
MW-90
MW-99 MW-01
MW-40
MW-92
MW-102
MW-48
MW-51
MW-61
MW-106
MW-110
MW-64
MW-27
MW-13
MW-57
Water Table/Potentiometric Surface
Application to Field Study
▪ Investigating groundwater flow regime
27.9
26.2
25.9
27.7 32.0
24.5
26.3
26.6 27.2
30.7
30.1
29.3
31.2
28.2
29.4
24.4
21.0
Water Table/Potentiometric Surface
Application to Field Study
▪ Investigating groundwater flow regime
27.9
26.2
25.9
27.7 32.0
24.5
26.3
26.6 27.2
30.7
30.1
29.3
31.2
28.2
29.4
24.4
21.0
Water Table/Potentiometric Surface
dh
Application to Field Study q = −K [m sec]
▪ Estimate flux between two wells dl
MW-102
36.6 masl
22.8 masl
−6
K = 6.5 10
= 0.20
L = 440 m
Water Table/Potentiometric Surface
dh
Application to Field Study q = −K [m sec]
▪ Estimate flux between two wells dl
MW-102
36.6 masl
D = 9.4 m
22.8 masl
−6
K = 6.5 10
= 0.20
L = 440 m
Water Table/Potentiometric Surface
dh
Application to Field Study q = −K [m sec]
▪ Estimate flux between two wells dl
▪ What is the hydraulic head at both wells?
▪ What is the elevation at both wells?
▪ What is the pressure head at both wells?
▪ What is the total head gradient?
MW-102 ▪ What is the volumetric flux?
▪ What is the average linear velocity?
36.6 masl
▪ Time for a tracer to travel between wells?
D = 9.4 m
22.8 masl
−6
K = 6.5 10
= 0.20
L = 440 m
Water Table/Potentiometric Surface
dh
Application to Field Study q = −K [m sec]
▪ Estimate flux between two wells dl
MW-102
36.6 masl
D = 9.4 m
22.8 masl
−6
K = 6.5 10
= 0.20
L = 440 m
Water Table/Potentiometric Surface
Application to Field Study
▪ Estimates of where, and how fast, contaminant is moving
27.9
26.2
25.9
27.7 32.0
24.5
26.3
26.6 27.2
30.7
30.1
29.3
31.2
28.2
29.4
24.4
21.0
Water Table/Potentiometric Surface
Application to Field Study
▪ Estimates of where, and how fast, contaminant is moving
14 58
360
12 320
28 280
16
280 240
265 200
118
160
5
120
80
6 40
43
383 0
241 SO4
(mg/L)