You are on page 1of 1

Subject: RA9165 (Performance Task)

Output guidelines:
1. Read the case of Pp vs NILA MALANA, GR. NO.233747, DEC. 5, 2018. It is impossible to answer the issue without
reading the case.
2. Supply the FACTS and DECISION.  The decision must answer the issue given.
3. FACTS and DECISION should NOT be more than ten (10) sentences each. WORD FORMAT.
4. Copying a substantial portion of the jurisprudence is not allowed, unless proper citation is provided, not to mention the
legal repercussions for intellectual dishonesty. Construct your own sentence/sentences.
5. Deadline for submission will be on or before June 13, 2021, to be submitted to (justforattyg@yahoo.com) Submission
after the deadline will be considered to have not submitted at all.
6. For clarifications, contact me at 09772511454.

CRITERIA FOR GRADING


Ability to identify and apply the legal principle with excellent logical presentation and appropriate use of the 9-10 points
language of law.
Ability to identify and apply the legal principle but with some infirmities in the logical reasoning and language of 6-8 points
law.
Unable to identify the legal principle but shows logical reasoning and good command of language of law in the 3-5 points
answer.
Unable to identify the legal principle with poor logical reasoning.  Defective use of the language of law. 1-2 points
0 point
No answer.  Yes or No answer without any explanation. 

FORMAT

FACTS:

ISSUE: Whether or not the three witnesses are required to be present during the conduct of search?

DECISION:

You might also like