You are on page 1of 6

A.

END-OF-SCHOOL-YEAR SCHOOL REPORT CARD (SRC) APPRAISAL TOOL


(Based on DO No. 44, s. 2015,  ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information)

DATA:
1. Enrollment EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. Total No. of Learners Enrolled
b. By Gender
c. For the Last 3 School Years
d. Used End of School Year (EoSY) Data
e. Used Stacked Bar Graph by Gender per Year
f. Compared Year-End Data with the Mid-Year
Data through line/bar graph
● Optional: If the school has special programs, they can also present in a separate graph the
enrolment number of the different types of learners by program (e.g. SPED, ADM, ALS, IPEd,
ALIVE) of the current year – schools can show the total for each type of learner
2. Health and Nutritional Status EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. No. of Learners who are Severely Wasted or
Wasted
b. By Gender
c. For Every Key Stage (K-3, 4-6, JHS, SHS)
d. Data are for the Current School Year
e. Used Stacked Bar Graph by Gender per Key
Stage
3. Learners’ Materials EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. The count of shortages/excess learners
materials per grade level is based on what
the students are using during the School
Year
b. Only subjects which have shortage/excess
learners materials will be listed per grade
level
c. Data are for the current School Year
d. Data are presented using tables per grade
level that show the number of
shortage/excess learners materials (by
subjects)
4. Teachers’ Professional Development EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. Number of teachers who attended
training/further studies
b. By kind/type of professional development
(e.g. ICT, Further studies, INSET, LAC, etc)
c. For the current School Year
d. Bar graph by kind/type of professional
development
5. Funding Sources EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT

1
a. Funding amount and sources (MOOE, LGU,
canteen, donors, etc.)
b. For the current School Year
c. Pie graph by funding source
6. School Awards and Recognitions EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. Top 3 awards/ recognition from award-giving
bodies duly recognized by DepEd
b. Listing by title, award-giving body, level
(school, division, regional, national,
international)
c. Categorized into student, teacher, school
head, and school awards
d. For the current School Year
e. Presented using tables.
7. Number and Rate of Dropouts by Causes EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. Count and percentage of learners who do not
finish a particular grade level. (It does not
capture learners who finish a grade level but
do not enrol in the next grade level the
following school year)
b. Five (5) major causes of dropout in the
school
c. For the last 3 years
d. Stacked bar graph by causes per year;
percentage is shown through a line graph
over the bar graph
8. Percentage of learners who completed the EVIDENT EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
School Year (Promotion Rate)
a. Percentage of learners who completed the
school year (Number of promoted learners
over number of total learners x 100)
b. Per grade level
c. For the current School Year
d. Presented using bar graph
9. National Achievement Test (NAT) – by EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
Mean Percentage Score (MPS)
a. MPS per subject
b. Grade 6 or 10 or 12 results
c. For the current School Year
d. Bar graph by MPS of each subject
*Use the average of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Quarterly Assessment Results (QAR).
10. Literacy Level EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. Total number of learners who are in the
frustration, instructional, and independent
levels for English and Filipino (oral and silent
2
reading)
b. Should show pre and post test results
c. For the current School Year
d. Bar graphs showing oral and silent reading
results (one for English and Filipino)
* If PHIL-IRI is used, will cover grades 2-6 only
* In the absence of a tool to measure literacy, schools can use PHIL-IRI results or
any existing tool to measure literacy
11. School-Based Management Assessment EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
Level
a. SBM Level and its corresponding qualitative
interpretation
12. Child-Friendly School Survey result EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. Points and Status
b. For the current School Year
13. Stakeholders’ Participation EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. Percentage (number of attendees over those
invited) of parents/guardians and other
stakeholders who attend during: a. Co-
curricular activities (Science month, Reading
month, contests, etc.) b. Extra-curricular
activities (Boy Scouts, Brigada Eskwela,
sports fests, etc.) c. Meetings and
Assemblies (SIP, CI, General PTA, etc.)
b. Total contribution (in kind, manhours, etc.) of
stakeholders which are accounted
c. By reporting period (Midyear and Year-end)
of the current School Year
d. For percentage: stacked bar graph by activity
(cocurricular, extracurricular, meetings/
assemblies) per stakeholder
e. For total contribution: stacked bar graph by
type of contribution per reporting period, with
total
14. Learner-Teacher Ratio EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to
teachers against the standard:
-Kinder (25:1)
-Grades 1 & 2 (40:1)
-Grades 3 to 10 (45:1)
-SHS (40:1)
b. Per grade level
c. For the current School Year
d. Ratio per grade level shown as bar graph
e. Standard is shown as line graph over the bar

3
graph
15. Learner-Classroom ratio EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to
classrooms against the standard:
Kinder (25:1)
Grades 1 & 2 (40:1)
Grades 3 to 10 (45:1)
SHS (40:1)
b. Per grade level
c. For the current School Year
d. Ratio per grade level shown as bar graph
e. Standard is shown as line graph over the bar
graph
16. Learner-Toilet Ratio EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to
functional toilets against standards (50:1)
b. Total number of toilets
c. By gender
d. For the current School Year
e. Standard is shown as line graph over the bar
graph
17. Learner-Seat Ratio EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to
seats against the standard (1:1)
b. Total number of chairs
c. For the current School Year
d. Standard is shown as line graph over the bar
graph
18. Status of Annual Implementation Plan EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
(AIP)/Continuous Improvement (CI)
Projects*
a. Top three (3) Priority Projects
b. Target vs. Actual Accomplishment
c. Percent of accomplishment based on the
target
19. Other Stakeholders’ Accomplishments EVIDENT NOT REMARKS
EVIDENT
a. Top three (3) stakeholders’
accomplishments/initiatives/activities
* Initiatives/activities independent from the PIA/CI projects (e.g. activities of the
SGC, SPG/SSG, etc.)

Appraised by:
4
NAME SIGNATURE DATE

B. End-of-School-Year Project Monitoring Report (EoSY PMR) Appraisal Tool


(Based on DO No. 44, s. 2015)

PARTS EVIDENT NOT REMARKS


EVIDENT
1. NAMES OF PROJECTS are the same as
those in the SIP.
2. OBJECTIVES are SMART.
(Specific, MEASURABLE, Achievable,
Realistic and TIME-BOUND.)
3. DATE OF MONITORING is during the End of
School Year
4. ACCOMPLISHMENT/STATUS TO DATE is
GIVEN IN PERCENT ONLY of
accomplishments
5. REMARKS contains explanations of the
percent of accomplishment (with
computations if necessary), and describes
the actual status of the project (e.g. number
of learners who became readers, comparison
of before and after data, amount of work
done for construction, etc.)
6. ISSUES/PROBLEMS/CHALLENGES
describes the hindering factors encountered
during project implementation.
7. RECOMMENDATIONS/ACTION POINTS
states the actions done by the project team to
address the issues/problems/challenges
8. SIGNATURES OF THE SPT AND PROJECT
TEAM LEADER
-printed copy contains the signatures of the
School Planning Team (SPT) members and
the Project Team Leader for each of the
projects.

Appraised by:
5
NAME SIGNATURE DATE

(EoSY PMR Template)

END-OF-SCHOOL-YEAR PROJECT MONITORING REPORT FORM


(For Projects Implemented on Year 1 of the SIP Cycle)
S.Y. 2016-2017

Accomplishments/
Project Signatures of SPT
Name of Date of Status to Date Issues/Problems/ Recommendations/
Objectives Remarks and Project Team
Project Monitoring (In Percent) Challenges Action Points
and Targets Leader
Based on Year 1 Targets

__________________________________
SCHOOL HEAD

You might also like