This document outlines the key result areas, objectives, timeline, weight, and performance indicators for evaluating a teacher named Rosemarie N. Reyna. The first objective is to prepare daily lesson plans and logs, with performance rated on submitting logs on time. The second is to monitor daily student attendance and submit reports, with performance based on the percentage of students monitored. The third is to act on student misbehavior and maintain classroom order, with performance again rated based on the percentage acted upon.
This document outlines the key result areas, objectives, timeline, weight, and performance indicators for evaluating a teacher named Rosemarie N. Reyna. The first objective is to prepare daily lesson plans and logs, with performance rated on submitting logs on time. The second is to monitor daily student attendance and submit reports, with performance based on the percentage of students monitored. The third is to act on student misbehavior and maintain classroom order, with performance again rated based on the percentage acted upon.
This document outlines the key result areas, objectives, timeline, weight, and performance indicators for evaluating a teacher named Rosemarie N. Reyna. The first objective is to prepare daily lesson plans and logs, with performance rated on submitting logs on time. The second is to monitor daily student attendance and submit reports, with performance based on the percentage of students monitored. The third is to act on student misbehavior and maintain classroom order, with performance again rated based on the percentage acted upon.
Results 1. Prepared daily Lesson Year- 10% OUTSTANDING (5) Plan/Lesson Log of Individual Performance Round Submitted Commitment andof Review on time the daily logs activities withForm all activities including parts completely in a school year. appropriate IM’s VERY SATISFACTORY (4) Name of Employee: ROSEMARIE N. REYNA Submitted on time but missed 1-5Name daily of Rater: logs of SALVADOR V. ACEDILLA Position: Teacher III activities in a school year. Position: Principal I Review Period: SATISFACTORY (3) Date of Review: Submitted on time but missed 6-10 daily logs of Bureau/Division/School: DEPED SURIGAO CITY-SURIGAO CITY PILOT SCHOOL activities in a school year. FAIR (2) Submitted on time but missed 11-15 daily logs of activities in a school year. POOR (1) Submitted on time but lacked 16 or more daily lesson logs in a school year. 2. Monitored daily Year 10% OUTSTANDING (5) pupils/students’ Round Monitored students’ daily attendance in a school year attendance and submitted reports. VERY SATISFACTORY (4) Monitored 95 % of students’ daily attendance in a school year and submitted reports. SATISFACTORY (3) 1. Teaching Monitored 90% of students’ daily attendance in a Learning school year and submitted reports. Process (30%) FAIR (2) Monitored 85% of students’ daily attendance in a school year and submitted reports. POOR (1) Monitored 80% of students’ daily attendance in a school year and submitted reports. 3. Acted on misbehavior Year 10% OUTSTANDING (5) of pupils/students Round 90-95% acted on misbehavior of students and orderliness of classroom. VERY SATISFACTORY (4) 85-89% acted on misbehavior of students and orderliness of classroom. SATISFACTORY (3) 80-84% acted on misbehavior of students and orderliness of classroom. FAIR (2) 75-79% acted on misbehavior of students and orderliness of classroom. POOR (1)