Professional Documents
Culture Documents
240 kN 120 kN
5.6 kN/m
Design loads
A B C D
9000
225 208
Shear force kN
32 48
168 185
330
280
250
320
Figure 5.2
For buildings that will be built in the UK, the nominal values of the yield NA.2.4
strength (fy) and the ultimate strength (fu) for structural steel should be those
obtained from the product standard. Where a range is given, the lowest
nominal value should be used.
0.81
72 = 72 58.32
1.0
27.99 < 58.32
Therefore the shear buckling resistance of the web does not need to be
verified.
Av ( f y / 3 )
V pl,Rd
M0
Av is the shear area and is determined as follows for rolled I and H sections
with the load applied parallel to the web.
A v A 2 bt f t f t w 2 r but not less than hw tw
123 10 2 2 305.3 15.4 15.4 9.9 ( 2 15.2 ) 3517.38 mm2
V c,Rd V pl, Rd
Av ( f y / 3 )
3517 .38 355 / 3
10 3 721 kN
6.2.6(2)
Eq (6.18)
M0 1.0
The design resistance for bending for Class 3 cross-sections is: 6.2.5(2)
W el,y f y 1450 10 3 355
M c,Rd M el,Rd 10 6 515 kNm Eq (6.14)
M0 1.0
M A,Ed 330
0.64 < 1.0 Eq (6.12)
M c,Rd 515
Therefore the bending resistance of the cross section is adequate.
Wy f y
LT 6.3.2.2(1)
M cr
BS EN 1993-1-1 does not give a method for determining the elastic critical
moment for lateral-torsional buckling (Mcr). Here the ‘LTBeam’ software
(which can be downloaded from the CTICM website) has been used to
determine Mcr.
When determining Mcr the following end restraint conditions have been applied
to the beam.
LTBeam symbol Definition Restraint applied (fixed/free)
v Lateral restraint Fixed
Torsional restraint Fixed
v’ Flexural restraint Free
’ Warping restraint Free
The value for the elastic critical moment obtained from ‘LTBeam’ is:
Mcr = 607.7 kNm
Therefore,
1450 10 3 355
LT 0.92
607.7 10 6
0.92 > 0.4
Therefore the resistance to lateral-torsional buckling must be verified. 6.3.2.2(4)
Verify that:
6.3.2.1(1)
M Ed
1.0 Eq (6.54)
M b,Rd
The design buckling resistance moment (Mb,Rd) of a laterally unrestrained beam 6.3.2.1(3)
is determined from: Eq (6.55)
fy
M b,Rd LT W y
M1
where:
Wy Wel,y for class 3 cross sections.
For UKC sections the method given in 6.3.2.3 for determining LT for rolled
sections may be used. Therefore,
1 1 6.3.2.3(1)
LT but 1.0 and Eq (6.57)
2
LT LT 2 LT 2 LT
where:
LT 0.5 1 LT LT LT,0 LT 2
From the UK National Annex LT,0 0.4 and 0.75 NA.2.17
LT 0.5 1 0.34 0.92 0.4 0.75 0.92 2 0.91 6.3.2.3(1)
1
LT 0.74
0.91 0.91 2 0.75 0.92 2
1 1
2
1.18
LT 0.92 2
0.74 < 1.0 < 1.18
Therefore,
LT 0.74
To account for the shape of the bending moment distribution, LT may be 6.3.2.3(2)
modified by the use of a factor ‘f’’.
LT
LT,mod but LT,mod 1.0 Eq (6.58)
f
where:
1 NA.2.18
kc
C1
C1 may be obtained from either tabulated data given in NCCI, such as Access
Steel document SN003, or determined from:
M cr (actual bending moment diagram)
C1
M cr ( uniform be nding moment diagram)
As a value for C1 for the bending moment diagram given in Figure 5.2 is not
given in the Access Steel document SN003 the value for C1 will be calculated.
Applying a uniform bending moment to the beam, the value of Mcr determined
from the ‘LTBeam’ software is:
M cr 460.5 kNm
607.7
C1 1.32
460.5
1
kc 0.87
1.32
f 1 0.5 1 0.87 1 2 0.92 0.8 2 0.94
6.3.2.3(2)
0.74 Eq (6.58)
LT,mod 0.79
0.94
The design buckling resistance moment (Mb,Rd) of a laterally unrestrained beam
is determined from:
fy
M b,Rd LTWy
M1 Eq (6.55)
where:
LT LT,mod
355
For this beam M b,Rd 0.79 1450 10 3 10 6 407 kNm
1.0
M A,Ed 330 Sheet 2
0.81 < 1.0 6.3.2.1(1)
M b,Rd 407 Eq (6.54)
Therefore the design buckling resistance of the member is adequate.
Page references
5.9 Blue Book Approach given in Section
The design resistances may be obtained from SCI publication P363. 5.9 are to P363
unless otherwise
Consider the 305 305 97 UKC in S355 stated.