You are on page 1of 5

MASTER OF Semester Learning Plan

ARCHITECTURE
Ver/Rev 1/0 Page 1/5

1. Course Identity
Course Title Heritage Management
Faculty Civil Engineering and Planning Study Program Master of Architecture
Code ARM – 924 Credits 4
Group Study Program Type Elective
Semester 1 Availability Open
Methods Class Discussion Media Blended
Class subjects/blocks Theory Prerequisite None
Coordinator/lecturer Dr. -Ing Putu Ayu P Agustiananda, ST,
MA
Arif Budi Sholihah, ST, MSc, Ph.D

2. Course Learning Outcome


Assignment/
Assessment/
LO CLO Course Learning
Learning Outcome (LO) Indicators Grading/ Weight
Code Code Outcome (CLO)
Measurement/
Evaluation
4 Comprehending 4.1 Able to explain the Student is able to explain Delivery 20%
architectural theories, relationship between the the principles and ethics Methods:
architectural design, principles and ethics of of cultural heritage - Introductory
aesthetics, structural cultural heritage conservation and to lecture
systems and building utilities conservation of compare them within - Class
comprehensively including European, Asian and the frameworks of discussion
the architecture in the Indonesian perspectives, European, Asian and
Indonesian Archipelago, and and architectural Indonesian perspectives. Assessment:
being able to relate it to the knowledge in general. Individual quiz
history and the development
of architecture in general to
develop the architectural
design characters of their
own.
4.2 Able to explain various Student is able to review Delivery 30%
methods, approaches a case study using methods:
and strategies within the Adaptive reuse, infill - Introductory
framework of design, Historic Urban lecture
conservation and Landscape, and Heritage - Class
management of historic Tourism methods in the discussion
buildings, sites and management of historic Assessment:
districts buildings, sites and Individual
districts presentation

11 Able to translate the spirit of 11.1 Able to identify the Student is able identify Delivery 20%
architectural innovations cultural significance of a the cultural significance methods:
into a solutions and designs cultural heritage district and to conduct cultural - Introductory
that are creative, tested, and use a method and mapping of an (Islamic) lecture
evidence-based and approach for the cultural heritage district - Class
performance-based in conservation and that involves local discussion
accordance and harmony management of Islamic community participation
with the context of Islamic historic district involving Assessment:
society, Indonesian society, the local community
MASTER OF Semester Learning Plan
ARCHITECTURE
Ver/Rev 1/0 Page 2/5

or the maritime community Survey and


and the local community.. group
observation
11.2 Able to prepare a Student is able to Delivery 30%
management model formulate and propose a methods:
proposal in the model for the Class discussion
management of a management of cultural
cultural heritage area heritage district based Assessment
(Islam) that is in on the results of cultural Model and FGD
accordance with the mapping, and to submit
context of the local and test the proposed
community model through a Focus
Group Discussion (FGD)
involving the local
community

3. Learning Achievement Map

4. Learning Experiences and References


Learning Experiences This course is designed with three main learning activities: case study presentation & discussion, field
observations and model proposal writing. Case study presentations are assignments that are individual in
nature to deepen and broaden knowledge related to each subject matter delivered by the lecturer. The
class discussion was focused on the subject matter guided by the lecturer. Field observations are group
assignments to practice the knowledge acquired in the classroom. The management model is a synthesis
of the semester learning process.
Main references 1. Orbasli, I. 2008. Architectural Conservation, Blackwell, Oxford
2. Semes, S.W. 2009. The Future of the Past: A Conservation Ethics for Architecture, Urbanism, and
Historic Preservation. New York: WW Norton and Company
3. Silva, K.D & Chapagain, N.K. 2013. Asian Heritage Management: Context, Concern, and Prospects.
London: Routledge
4. Bandarin, F., & van Oers, R. (Eds). 2014. Reconnecting the City: The Historic Urban Landscape
Approach and the Future of Urban Heritage. Wiley-Blackwell.

Additional references 5. Rodwell, D. 2007. Conservation and Sustainability in Historic Cities. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
6. Kalman, H. 2014. Heritage Planning. New York: Routledge.
7. Orbaşli, A. 2000. Tourists in Historic Towns: urban conservation and heritage management. London:
Spon Press.
8. Stubbs, J.H. and Robert G. Thomson, R.G. 2016. Architectural Conservation in Asia: National
Experiences and Practice. 1st Edition. Routledge
9. Operational Guidelines for the implementation of World Heritage Conventions
10. UNESCO Historic Urban Landscape
MASTER OF Semester Learning Plan
ARCHITECTURE
Ver/Rev 1/0 Page 3/5

11. UU Cagar Budaya No. 11 Tahun 2010

5. Learning Activities
CLO/ Learning
Sessions Subject/Topics Implementation Reference
Sub-CLO Methods/Model
4.1. Introduction Lecture and class 4 x 50 minutes 1-4
1
Able to explain the - Principles and ethics in cultural discussion
relationship between the heritage conservation
principles and ethics of - Paradigms in the conservation Assignment of
cultural heritage and management of cultural term paper
conservation of European,
heritage
Asian and Indonesian
perspectives, and Heritage conservation and Lecture and class 4 x 50 minutes 1, 2
2
architectural knowledge in management from Western discussion
general. perspectives: initiatives and
directions (conventions, Presentation of
recommendations, charters) proposal
Heritage conservation and Lecture and class 4 x 50 minutes 3, 8
3
management from Asian discussion
perspectives: tradition and
development of a conservation
policy framework, intangible
cultural heritage
Conservation and management of Lecture and class 4 x 50 minutes 3, 8, 11
4
cultural heritage in Indonesia discussion
the development of the
conservation movement and the
legal and policy frameworks on
cultural heritage conservation
4.2 Design in historic environment: Individual 4 x 50 minutes 1, 6
5
Able to explain various adaptive reuse and infill design for paper-draft
methods, approaches and historic buildings presentation and
strategies within the consultation
framework of Historic Urban Landscape Individual 4 x 50 minutes 4, 10
6
conservation and Approach paper-draft
management of historic presentation and
buildings, sites and consultation
areas/districts Pre-mid-semester presentation Individual 4 x 50 minutes 3, 5, 7
7
paper-draft
presentation and
consultation
MIDTERM EXAMINATION
Take-home Examination: individual paper manuscript of case studies of the cultural heritage management using certain methods and
approaches
11.1 Identification of cultural Lecture and class 4 x 50 minutes
8
Able to identify the cultural significance and cultural mapping discussion
significance of historic of historic areas/districts
areas/districts and use a Respect for cultural diversity and
method and approach for improvement of quality of life in
heritage tourism historic area management
development and
management of Islamic
historic areas/districts
MASTER OF Semester Learning Plan
ARCHITECTURE
Ver/Rev 1/0 Page 4/5

involving the local Heritage Tourism in historic areas Field study 4 x 50 minutes
9
community or towns (Part 1)
Historic areas/town as tourist
destination
How tourism contribute to urban
conservation?

Heritage Tourism in historic areas Field study 4 x 50 minutes


10
or towns (Part 2)
Rituals and traditional festivals in
Islamic historic districts

Community engagement in Presentation of 4 x 50 minutes


11
managing historic districts group task results
Sense of place and local
community
Heritage management for social
development and local
empowerment.

11.2 Public, private, community Presentation of 4 x 50 minutes


12
Able to explain heritage partnership in heritage group task results
management frameworks in management
a cultural heritage Key players and local management
areas/districts frameworks

11.3.
Able to explain heritage Heritage impact assessment Presentation of 4 x 50 minutes
13
impact assessment Planning-based approach for urban group task results
conservation

End-of Semester Paper Presentation of 4 x 50 minutes


14
Presentation poster and book
dummy
END-OF-SEMESTER EXAMINATION
Take-home examination: Paper Manuscript for proceedings or journal publication

6. Grading and Evaluation System


Grading system Grading is based on benchmarking, that is to use University/Faculty/Study Program on absolute value
standard absolute. Assessment is based on descriptive rubrics in accordance with the weight of each
indicator of learning outcomes

Evaluation system Students must meet the minimum grade of all course learning outcomes to be able to graduate. Thus, all
assignments and assessments of all lecturers must be followed.

Date : Date : Date : 8 October 2021


Authorized by the Study Program: Examined by the Study Field Cluster Prepared by the Course Coordinator:
Coordinator:
MASTER OF Semester Learning Plan
ARCHITECTURE
Ver/Rev 1/0 Page 5/5

Ir. Suparwoko, MURP, PhD. Ir. Wiryono Raharjo, M.Arch, PhD. Dr.-Ing. Putu Ayu P Agustiananda, ST, MA

You might also like