You are on page 1of 10

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: TERESITA BABY P. CACAYORIN Name of Rater: JOYE D. MADALIPAY, EdD
Position: Head Teacher I Position: Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period : October, 2020 –July 2021 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: ILOCOS NORTE/SUBA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
TIMEL Weig PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES INE ht (Quality, Efficiency, Timeless) Rating SCORE
per
KRA Actual Q E T
Results
BASIC I.INSTRUC 1. To perform 100% monitoring and Marc 10% QUALITY: Target for Small School (Elementary) 2 alternative
EDUC TIONAL supervision of classes through the conduct of h to classroom
ATIO LEADERSH at least 2 alternative classroom observations June 5 – Conducted 2 alternative classroom observations for observations
N IP to teachers and weekly intensive checking of 2021 _7_to_8_teachers with accomplished COTs were
SERVI (30%) weekly home learning plans, lesson 4 - Conducted 2 alternative classroom observations for conducted to 4
CES overviews, DLL, lesson exemplars and the like _5_to_6_ teachers with accomplished COTs 5 to 6
with appropriate instructional materials to 3 – Conducted 2 alternative classroom observations for teachers
ensure efficiency and effectiveness of _3_to_4 teachers with accomplished COTs with
teaching throughout the school year. 2 – Conducted 2 alternative classroom observations for accomplished
_2_ teachers with accomplished COTs COT
MOV 1 – Conducted 2 alternative classroom observations for
1. Checklist and samples of checked, 1 teacher/s with accomplished COT
reviewed and approved
- Weekly home learning plans,
- Lesson overviews, EFFICIENCY:
- DLL, Checked,
- Lesson exemplars 5 – Checked, reviewed and approved… of _7__teachers reviewed and
2. Approved Monthly Supervisory Plan 4 – Checked, reviewed and approved… of _5__ teachers approved
3. Approved Monthly Supervisory Report 3 – Checked, reviewed and approved… of _4__ teachers Weekly 5
4. Checklist of Online Teaching/Alternative 2 – Checked, reviewed and approved… of _3__ teachers Home
Teaching Effectiveness for Teachers 1 – Checked, reviewed and approved… of _1__ teachers Learning Plan
5. Lists of checked, reviewed and of 7 teachers
approved: Timeliness:
- supplementary materials in
print/digital format used in the lesson delivery by 5 – Implemented Approved Supervisory Plan according Implemented
each teacher to schedule approved
- Locally crafted SLMs by each 4 – Implemented Approved Supervisory Plan with 1 – 3 supervisory 4
teacher instances of rescheduling plan with 2
- Locally developed activity sheets by 3 – Implemented Approved Supervisory Plan with 4 – 6 instances of
each teacher instances of rescheduling rescheduling
- List of locally crafted learning 2 – Implemented Approved Supervisory Plan with 7 – 9
modules by each teacher instances of rescheduling
- List of locally produced video 1 – Implemented Supervisory Plan with 10 or more
lessons by each teacher instances of rescheduling
- List of locally made audio lessons
and other learning materials Note: No. of Teachers in each Category (Elementary)
- Observation notes and COTs Small – 9 & below 0.433
- Individual Weekly Learner’s Guide Medium – 10 to 29
- Progress Learning Monitoring Large – 30 & above
Template
Cate Rating
gory 5 4 3 2 1
S 91- 81-90 71-80 61-70 51-60
100
M 51- 41-50 31-40 21-30 11-30
100
L 41- 31-40 21-30 11-20 5-10
100

2. To achieve at least 80% developing readers Oct 10% QUALITY:


and 50% advanced readers from the 2020 5 – _30 out of _37 beginning reading level achieved PHIL-IRI
identified beginning and developing readers to developing reading level and _43 out of Result
respectively in English and Filipino through June 49_developing reading level achieved advanced Post Test A.
the implementation of Approved School 2021 reading level in English; _18 out of _23 beginning
Reading Program in English and Filipino reading level achieved developing reading level and A. English
and/or Reading Intervention Program _39 out of _54 developing reading level achieved
advanced reading level in Filipino Beginning
MOVs: 4 – _28 out of _37 beginning reading level achieved Reading = 21 4
1. Baseline Data for (SY 2020 – 2021) developing reading level and _39 out of 49
Subjec Enrolm Beginn Develo Advan developing reading level achieved advanced reading Developing
t ent ing ping ced level in English; _17 out of _23 beginning reading Reading = 28
Grades Reader Reader Reader level achieved developing reading level and _35 out
1-6 s s s of _54 developing reading level achieved advanced Advance = 75
Eng. 126 37 49 40 reading level in Filipino
Fil. 126 23 54 49 B. Filipino
3 – _26 out of _37 beginning reading level achieved
2. Approved School Reading Program in developing reading level and _34 out of_49 Beginning
English and Filipino developing reading level achieved advanced reading Reading = 10
3. Approved Learners Intervention Plan level in English; _16 out of _23 beginning reading
prepared by each teacher level achieved developing reading level and _32 out Developing
of _54 developing reading level achieved advanced Reading = 26
4. Periodic results of reading assessments reading level in Filipino
in English and Filipino by grade level 2 – _24 out of _37 beginning reading level achieved Advance = 90
5. Locally developed Reading Assessment developing reading level and _30 out of_49
Tool for each grade level developing reading level achieved advanced reading
level in English; _15 out of _23 beginning reading
level achieved developing reading level and _27 out
of _54 developing reading level achieved advanced
reading level in Filipino
1 –_22 out of _37 beginning reading level achieved
developing reading level and 29 out of 49 developing
reading level achieved advanced reading level in
English; _14 out of _23 beginning reading level
achieved developing reading level and _23 out of
_54 developing reading level achieved advanced
reading level in Filipino

EFFICIENCY:
5 – Conducted monthly monitoring and supervision of Monthly
Reading Intervention Program for struggling readers monitoring
and checked on the developmentally appropriate and
reading materials for 5 – 6 grade levels with 5 or supervision
more MOVs of Reading
4 – Conducted monthly monitoring and supervision of Intervention
Reading Intervention Program for struggling readers Program for 4
and checked on the developmentally appropriate struggling
reading materials for 4 – 5 grade levels with 5 or readers was
more MOVs conducted
3 – Conducted monthly monitoring and supervision of and
Reading Intervention Program for struggling readers appropriate
and checked on the developmentally appropriate reading
reading materials for 3 – 4 grade levels with 5 or materials for
more MOVs 4 – 5 grade
2 – Conducted monthly monitoring and supervision of levels was
Reading Intervention Program for struggling readers checked
and checked on the developmentally appropriate
reading materials for 2 – 3 grade levels with 5 or
more MOVs

1 – Conducted monthly monitoring and supervision of


Reading Intervention Program for struggling readers
and checked on the developmentally appropriate
reading materials for 1 – 2 grade levels with 5 or 0.40
more MOVs
3. Check and monitor the conduct of at least Oct. QUALITY:
4 Summative Assessment Tests and 4 2020 10% 5 – Conducted periodic monitoring and checking of 4 or Periodic
Performance Tasks to ensure quality to more Summative Assessment Tests and 4 more monitoring
assessment of learning July performance Tasks of 7 teachers in all grade levels and checking
2021 with complete MOVs of summative
MOVs 4 – Conducted periodic monitoring and checking of 4 or assessment
more Summative Assessment Tests and 4 more tests and
1. Approved performance tasks with rubrics performance Tasks of _5 to_6 teachers in all grade performance
prepared by each teacher levels with complete MOVs tasks of 6
2. Approved written activities with rubrics and 3 – Conducted periodic monitoring and checking of 4 or teachers 4
other assessment tools prepared by each more Summative Assessment Tests and 4 more were
teacher performance Tasks of _3 to_4 teachers in all grade conducted
3. Approved schedule of assessment and levels with complete MOVs
conduct of performance tasks 2 – Conducted periodic monitoring and checking of 4 or
more Summative Assessment Tests and 4 more
performance Tasks of _2 teachers in all grade levels
with complete MOVs
1 – Conducted periodic monitoring and checking of 4 or
more Summative Assessment Tests and 4 more
performance Tasks of _1 teacher in all grade levels
with complete MOVs

EFFICIENCY

5 – Checked 4 Summative Assessment Tests with TOS 3 summative


and 4 Performance Tasks with Rubrics of 7 teachers assessment
4 – Checked 3 Summative Assessment Tests with TOS test with TOS
and 3 Performance Tasks with Rubrics of _5_to 6 and 3
teachers performance
3 – Checked 2 Summative Assessment Tests with TOS tasks with
and 2 Performance Tasks with Rubrics of _3 to 4 rubrics of 6 4 0.40
teachers teachers
2 – Checked 1 Summative Assessment Tests with TOS were checked
and 1 Performance Tasks with Rubrics of 2 teachers
1 – Checked 4 Summative Assessment Tests with TOS
and 4 Performance Tasks with Rubrics of 1 teacher
II. 1. To provide technical assistance through the Oct. QUALITY:
HUMAN conduct of monthly LAC Session and required 2020
RESOURC in-Service Training to enhance instructional to 10% 5 – Conducted and implemented 9-10 approved
E competence of teachers throughout the school June Monthly LAC session Plans and at least 2 School-based
MANAGE year 2021 INSETs with 5 or more MOVs
MENT
AND MOVs: 4 – Conducted and implemented 7-8 approved Monthly
DEVELOP LAC session Plans and at least 2 School-Based INSETs
MENT 1. Approved Monthly LAC Plan/Proposals with 4 MOVs 5 approved
(20%) and INSET Proposals LAC Session
2. Approved LAC Monthly LAC 3 – Conducted and implemented 5-6 approved Monthly Plans were
Reports/INSET Report LAC session Plans and at least 2 School-Based INSETs conducted
3. Individual Teacher LAC Outputs with 3 MOVs and
4. Provision of TA Logbook implemented 3 0.30
5. In-service Training Terminal 2 – Conducted and implemented 1-2 approved Monthly
Reports/Write-ups LAC session Plans and at least 2 School-based INSETs
with 2 MOVs

1 – Conducted and implemented 1-2 approved Monthly


LAC session Plans and at least 2 School-based INSETs
with 1 MOV

2. Ensure professional development of Oct. 10% QUALITY


teachers by properly monitoring the 2020 5 – _7 teachers attended professional development All teachers
attendance of teachers to webinar being to activities/webinars/trainings conducted by Central, attended
conducted by the Central Office, Regional June Regional and Division Offices with certificate of professional
Office and Division Office 2021 attendance/participation development
4 - _5__to_6__teachers attended professional activities/we
MOV: development activities/webinars/trainings binars/trainin
conducted by Central, Regional and Division Offices gs conducted
- List of attended seminars with with certificate of attendance/participation with 5 0.50
Certificate of Participation 3 - _3__to_4__teachers attended professional certificate of
development activities/webinars/trainings attendance /
conducted by Central, Regional and Division Offices participation
with certificate of attendance/participation
2 - _2__teachers attended professional development
activities/webinars/trainings conducted by Central,
Regional and Division Offices with certificate of
attendance/participation
1 – ___1___teacher attended professional development
activities/webinars/trainings conducted by Central,
Regional and Division Offices with certificate of
attendance/participation

III. 1. To provide a secure, orderly, nurturing Oct. 5% Quality:


LEARNIN healthy environment through the 2020
G implementation of at least 6 programs, to 5 – 5 PPAs were implemented throughout the school
ENVIRON projects and activities July year
MENT 2021 4 – 4 PPAs were implemented throughout the school
(20%) MOVs: year 4 PAPs were 4
3 – 3 PPAs were implemented throughout the school fully
1. Write-up of programs/projects/activities year implemented
2. Terminal Reports 2 – 2 PPAs were implemented throughout the school
3. Approved Program Proposals year
4. Attendance of stakeholders 1 – 1 PPAs were implemented throughout the school
5. Positive impacts of PPAs year

Efficiency:

5 – With 5 or more MOVs


4 – With 4 MOVs 4 MOVs were 4 0.20
3 – With 3 MOVs accomplished
2 – With 2 MOVs
1 – With 1 MOV
Note: Elementary
Categ Rating
ory 5 4 3 2 1
No. of Targeted Projects
S 5 4 3 2 1
M 6 5 4 3 2
L 7 6 5 4 3

2. To provide safety and protection of teaching Oct. 15% QUALITY


and non – teaching personnel by procuring 2020 5 – 91% - 100% implementation of the activity and
health essentials and installing health facilities to project Procurement
July 4 – 81% - 90% implementation of the activity and of health
MOVs 2021 project essentials
1. Financial Statement 3 – 71% - 80% implementation of the activity and was fully
2. Activity/Project Proposal project accomplished
3. Purchase Request 2 – 61% - 70% implementation of the activity and 4
4. Acknowledgment Receipts project
5. Accomplishment Report 1 – 60% and below implementation of the activity and
project

EFFICIENCY
5 – With 5 or more MOVs
4 – With 4 MOVs
3 – With 3 MOVs 4 MOVs were 4 0.20
2 – With 2 MOVs accomplished
1 – With 1 MOV
IV. 1. To ensure participation of stakeholders Oct. 5% QUALITY:
PARENTS coming from at least 5 sectors such as 2020 5- 5 Sectors participated in the different PPAs to support
’INVOLVE PTA, Alumni, Barangay, LGU, NGO and to the BE-LCP with complete MOVs 3 sectors
MENT other volunteers to support the different July 4- 4 Sectors participated in the different PPAs to support participated
AND PPAs of the Basic Education Learning 2021 the BE-LCP with complete MOVs in the
COMMU Continuity Plan (BELCP) 3 - 3 Sectors participated in the different PPAs to different 3
NITY support the BE-LCP with complete MOVs PPAs such as
PARTNER 2 - 2 Sectors participated in the different PPAs to PTA,
SHIP MOVs: support the BE-LCP with complete MOVs Barangay and
(10%) 1. Memorandum of Agreement 1- 1 Sectors participated in the different PPAs to Alumni
2. Memorandum of Understanding support the BE-LCP with complete MOVs
3. Deed of Donation
4. Acceptance EFFICIENCY:
5. Acknowledgement Receipt 5 – With 5 or more MOVs
6. Notice/Letter of Invitation 4 – With 4 MOVs 3 MOVs 3 0.15
7. Accomplishment Report 3 – With 3 MOVs accomplished
2 – With 2 MOVs
1 – With 1 MOV

2. To obtain resources for school learning Oct. 5% Quality:


materials a way to increase stakeholders 2020
involvement and participation to 5 – Php 51,000 or more financial assistance/donation Raised funds
July obtained to support the different PPAs of the BE-LCP for the
MOVs 2021 4 – Php 41,000 – 50,000 financial assistance/donation construction
obtained to support the different PPAs of the BE-LCP of 1 span
1. Accomplishment Report 3 – Php 31,000 – 40,000 financial assistance/donation perimeter 3
2. Acknowledgment Receipt obtained to support the different PPAs of the BE-LCP fence and
3. Certificate of Appreciation 2 – Php 21,000 – 30,000 financial assistance/donation other
4. List of Donations obtained to support the different PPAs of the BE-LCP materials for
5. Financial Statement 1 – Php 20,000 & below financial assistance/donation the printing
obtained to support the different PPAs of the BE-LCP of modules

Efficiency:

5 – With 5 or more MOVs


4 – With 4 MOVs 3 MOVs
3 – With 3 MOVs accomplished 5 0.20
2 – With 2 MOVs
1 – With 1 MOV

V. 1. To ensure 100% proper & timely utilization of May, 10% QUALITY


SCHOOL school resources as reflected in ESIP/AIP by 2020 5 – Utilized 100% of the school resources as reflected in School
LEADERS the end of school Year – the ESIP/AIP resources
HIP AND April, 4 – Utilized 91% - 99% of the school resources as were utilized
MANAGE MOV 2021 reflected in the ESIP/AIP based on the
MENT 1. Approved ESIP/AIP 3 – Utilized 81% - 90% of the school resources as SIP/AIP 5
OPERATI 2. Liquidation Reports reflected in the ESIP/AIP
ONS 3. Commendations 2 – Utilized 71% - 80% of the school resources as
(20%) 4. No Audit Findings reflected in the ESIP/AIP
1 – Utilized 70% & below of the school resources as
reflected in the ESIP/AIP

EFFICIENCY
5- Submitted 100% liquidation report with complete Liquidation
supporting documents reports were
4 – Submitted 91-99% liquidation reports with complete submitted on 5
supporting documents time with
3 – Submitted 81-90% liquidation reports with complete complete
supporting documents documents
2 – Submitted 71-80% liquidation reports with complete
supporting documents 100% of the
1 – Submitted 71% and below liquidation reports with MOOE was
complete supporting documents utilized and
liquidated 0.50
with 0 audit
findings

2. To ensure 100% compliance to DepEd policies, May 10% QUALITY


accounting and auditing rules and regulations on 2020 5 – Zero audit findings 100% of the
the utilization of school resources to 4 – 1 Audit findings MOOE was
April 3 – 2 Audit findings utilized and 5
MOV 2021 2 – 3 Audit findings liquidated
1. Certificate of zero audit findings 1 – 4 or more Audit findings with 0 audit
2. Certificate of Commendation findings
EFFICIENCY
5 – Received 11 – 12 memorandum of commendation Received
within the year memorandu
4 – Received 9 – 10 memorandum of commendation m od
within the year commendatio 4
3 – Received 7 – 8 memorandum of commendation ns
within the year
2 – Received 5 – 6 memorandum of commendation 0.45
within the year
1 – Received less than 5 memorandum of
commendation within the year
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weighted assigned OVERALL
RATINGS FOR 4.133
ACCOMPLISH
MENTS

JOYE D. MADALIPAY, EdD TERESITA BABY P. CACAYORIN JOANN A. CORPUZ, EdD, CESO V
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Head Teacher I Schools Division Superintendent
Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like