Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cost Estimating Budgeting STAP G 1 M 14483
Cost Estimating Budgeting STAP G 1 M 14483
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division REVISION
STAP-G-1-M-14483 0
INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT
This handbook supports Wells Cost Management and in particular Wells Cost Estimating,
Budgeting and Controlling for Exploration and Develpment Projects.
Cost Estimating is the process of developing an approximation (estimate) of the cost of the
resources needed to execute and complete project activities. As a predictive process,
estimating must address risks and uncertainties. The outputs of estimating are used primarily
as input for budgeting, cost or value analysis, decision making in business, asset and project
planning, or for project cost and schedule monitoring and control processes.
Cost Budgeting is the process of developing the time-phasing (and / or depth phasing) of cost
disbursement for the project, operation or activity.
Cost Controlling is the process of controlling changes to the project’s cost estimate. It is
carried out to verify, according to a defined frequency, that actual project’s costs figures trends
are in line with Wells Cost Estimates (WCE) and Wells Cost Baseline (WCB). As a verification
process, controlling early highlight cost variations, so to enable Project Team to define and
implement corrective actions to guarantee that cost objectives (WCE and WCB) are met
through the entire Project Life Cycle.
This Cost Estimating, Budgeting and Controlling Handbook has to be considered a Company
Standard defining the requirements, methodologies and rules that must be followed to operate
uniformly and in compliance with the Company Principles.
The final aim is to improve performance and efficiency in terms of project costs, while providing
all personnel involved in Drilling, Completion and Production Optimization activities with
common guidelines in all areas where the Company operates.
IMPLEMENTATION
All engineers engaged in Drilling, Completion and Workover activities are expected to make
themselves familiar with the contents of this manual and be responsible for compliance to it.
This handbook has been developed to assist DC&W Dept. in performing Wells Cost Estimating
and Controlling, with the aim of:
o providing a standard to perform Wells Cost Estimating and Wells Cost Controlling;
o improving the confidence on Wells Cost Estimates;
o controlling changes to Wells Cost Estimates;
o supporting the overall project performance maximisation and enabling it to achieve its
stated goals with the use of minimum resources.
This handbook intends to provide assurance to Company and Shareholders that Project WCE
activities provide reliable data to support the decision process and that Project WCOSTC
ensures proper control of Project’s cost expenditures.
SPEO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAG 3 OF 5
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division REVISION
STAP-G-1-M-14483 0
This handbook defines workflows, methods and approaches in order to provide a standard
framework for carrying out Wells Cost Estimating process and Wells Controlling process, to
satisfy the above-described objectives.
In particular:
Wells Cost provides Wells Cost Management Process overview and general Wells Cost
Engineering knowledge
Wells Cost Glossary provides the definition of the cost terms used through the various
handbooks and reference to the corresponding or modified Development Management
System (DMS) terms
Wells Cost Estimating for Feasibility Phase provides the process and the main
techniques of Wells Cost Estimating applicable during the Feasibility phase
Wells Cost Estimating for Planning Phase provides the process and the main
techniques of Wells Cost Estimating applicable during the Planning Phase
Wells Cost Estimating for Unit Cost Revision Phase provides the process and the
main techniques of Wells Cost Estimating applicable during the Unit Cost Revision
Phase
Wells Cost Controlling for Execution Phase provides the process and the main
techniques of Wells Cost Controlling applicable during the Wells Cost Controlling Phase
Wells Cost Code provides Company standard Cost Breakdown Structure and relevant
use rules.
This handbook is a ‘live’ controlled document and, as such, it will only be amended and
improved by the Company in accordance with the development of Company experience.
Accordingly, it will be the responsibility of everyone concerned in the use and application of this
handbook to suggest revisions on an ongoing basis.
Derogations from the handbook shall be approved solely in writing by the by the Manager of the
local Drilling, Completion and Workover Department (DC&W Dept.) after the local Company
Manager and the Corporate Drilling & Production Optimization Services Standards Department
in Eni E&P Division Head Office have been advised in writing.
The Corporate Drilling & Production Optimization Services Standards Department will consider
such approved derogations for future amendments and improvements of this handbook, when
the updating of the document will be advisable.
SPEO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAG 4 OF 5
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division REVISION
STAP-G-1-M-14483 0
INDEX
SECTION 1 Wells Cost
Wells Cost Management
Planning Process Overview
Types of Costs
Types of Estimates
Cost Breakdown Structure
Wells Cost Estimate Coding and Documentation
Wells Cost Estimate Build-Up
Assumptions and Constrains
Similitude Criteria
Drilling Cost Drivers
Allowances
Cost indexes
Location Factors
Cost Escalation
Contingencies
Expected Accuracy Range
Cost Data
Cost Engineering Basic Formulas
CAPEX, OPEX and DECAB Cost Estimating
Lyfe Cycle Cost
Wells Cost Estimating Boundaries
ACRONYMS
CV Cost Variance
CI Cost Index
PT Project Team
SPEO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAG 1 OF 53
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division REVISION
STAP-G-1-M-14483 0
SECTION 1
WELLS COST
INDEX
11. ALLOWANCES...............................................................................................................25
13. CONTINGENCIES...........................................................................................................30
Wells Cost
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division
Documents
Wells Cost Estimating Wells Cost Estimating Wells Cost Estimating Wells Cost Controlling
for Feasibility Phase for Planning Phase for Unit Cost Revision Phase for Execution Phase
Wells Cost
Wells Cost Estimating
Wells Cost
Controlling
Phases
Unit Cost
Project
STAP-G-1-M-14483
WCE
(Feasibility WCE WCE
WCE WCE
Estimating a nd
Techical & Cost
Cost Estimating Unit Cost Cost
Cost Estimating for Feasibility for Planning Control
Revision
OF
Controlling Processes
REVISION
Wells
53
Execution &
Completion
+ 4 0% - 2 5% + 25 %
Unit Cost Production &
Feasibility G1 Feasibility G2 Pla nning G3 Revision R Execution Hand
over close out
Wells
DC&W
Is the asset ready for
production?
Class I
Eni S.p.A.
- 1 5% + 15 % - 1 0% + 10 %
E&P Division
(FINANCIAL
Wells Update
BUDGET)
Engineering
Drilling & Drilling &
Completion Study Completion Study Procurement
Wells Cost
- Casing Wea r St udy
- Bits Progr am
- Well Head Def ini tio n
- Operation al Sequ ence Defi nit ion
- Drill ing Un it Charact eris a tio n
STAP-G-1-M-14483
Charac t eris t ics of prod uced / injecte d flu ids Well De velo pmen t Sche du les Defin it ion Reservo ir mo del u pdat e Operat ion
- Complet ion F lui ds Prog ram
Res tora tio n
Technica l & Econom ic eval uat ion Dril li ng & Com ple tio n St udy
- Remedia l Jo b eval uat ion
Model li ng of conc ep t alte rnat ives
- Operation al Sequ ence
Cost
- Procurem ent P lan N
- Procurement Sche dule Estimating
REVISION
A Output
Market Scout ing / Pre -inqu iry
Tender in g
Project Execut ion P lan nin g
SPEO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAG 6 OF 53
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division REVISION
STAP-G-1-M-14483 0
Activity Cost
Scope Duration Budgeting
Definition Estimating
Resource
Planning
Risk
Management
Planning
Cost Estimating process has different characteristics in the various project phases (Feasibility,
Planning, Unit Cost Revision).
The detailed Cost Estimating process for each project phase is described under the Well Cost
Estimate Handbooks for the various project’s phases.
A general Planning Process scheme for Wells - including Cost Estimating - is given in the figure
below.
Reference Wells
Project Data Field Data
Wells Technical
Collection Analysis
Data gathering Outline
Risk
Management
Planning
Wells Wells Activity
Resources Definition and
Planning Sequencing
Wells
Wells
Development
Cost Estimating Execution
Schedules
Time Evaluation
Definition
Cost
DB Setup Time Schedule
DB Setup
o Risk Management Planning: identifying the project risks and defining a plan to control
such risks
o Wells Activity Definition and Sequencing: identifying and sequencing the various
activities required for executing the wells
o Wells Resource Planning: identifying and quantifying the various resources required to
perform the activities identified
o Time Schedule DB Setup: defining the time durations applicable in relation to identified
reference wells
o Wells Execution Time Evaluation: selecting and defining the duration of the activities
identified as function of the information available from the area of activity and of the
resources identified or eventually assuming a generic rig
o Wells Development Schedules Definition: defining the mobilization-drilling-
demobilization schedule, with reference to the drilling rig and techniques selected
o Cost DB Setup: selecting and defining the cost of the activities identified as function of
identified time durations and resources
Project Cost Baseline (PCB) is the original approved plan (for a project, a operation package, or
an activity) which defines and qualifies the WCE.
Thus PCB defines cost figures but also the operations, the assumptions (on operation scope on
operation durations and on operation costs), etc., which underline the WCE.
When the original plan is varied (i.e. higher drilling depth, lower penetration rate, etc.) it is
reasonable to expect also a modification to WCE.
Regardless whether revised WCE are approved or not by higher management level than DPM,
it is paramount to develop corrective actions to ensure the achievement of WCE.
When such variances can’t be absorbed, the Project Team shall redefine the Wells Project
Baseline and in particular the Wells Cost Baseline and Wells Cost Estimate.
This will ensure that:
1. reasonable project objectives - in particular revised project schedule and project cost
estimate - are re-defined
2. remaining part of the project is controlled versus a feasible project baseline.
3. TYPES OF COSTS
Costs can be classified under different categories; here are mentioned those applicable to
Wells Cost Estimating process.
Cost Classification
Classification Sub- Explication and notes
classification
General cost Note: for reference only
classification
Direct costs Costs traceable directly to the product or service being
produced (i.e. salary of personnel working on a
project). Further subdivision is possible:
o Direct Material: cost of materials, assemblies,
and parts that are used for the project
completion.
o Direct Labour: wages and salary of personnel
working for the project completion.
Indirect costs All costs which do not become a final part of the
installation, but that are required for the orderly
completion of the project (i.e. field administration, direct
supervision, start-up costs, insurance, taxes, etc.)
Overhead costs A cost inherent in the performing of an activity that
cannot be charged to or identified with a part of the
work, or asset and therefore must be allocated on
some arbitrary basis believed to be equitable, or
handled as an expense independent of the project
effort (i.e. legal department assistance, etc.).
Standard costs, Standard costs are desired cost objectives (i.e.
budgets and manhours cost for a defined drawing preparation, or for
variances a drilling sub-activity execution, etc.).
Budgets refer a macro activity (i.e. drilling dept. cost).
Variances are the difference between planned and
actual costs, used to evaluate areas of good or poor
performance.
Joint costs Joint costs are costs related to more parts of the
project and cannot be assigned up to specific part until
a certain project progress is reached.
Rig Contractor
Intangible
Well site
Tangible
4. TYPES OF ESTIMATES
In general terms, several type of estimates are used and these may be classified by:
How the estimate will be used;
The type/quantity/amount of information available for preparing the estimate;
The range of accuracy desired in the estimate;
The calculation technique used to prepare the estimate;
The time allotted to produce the estimate;
The method of input / form of output (computer, manual forms) in preparing the
estimate;
The phase of project (Feasibility, Planning, Unit Cost Revision) in which the
estimate is prepared;
The perspective of preparer (Company, contractor, insurance company, etc.);
Etc.
It is used when cost values are known with certainty (i.e. in routine projects).
Deterministic cost estimating relies upon fixed cost figures or “base cost” for each cost item.
This cost is calculated by the estimator on the basis of his / her previous experience –
correspondence to P(50/50) in the probabilistic estimate may be assumed.
Contingencies are calculated as a percentage of the base cost and are added to the cost
item(s).
Probability Probability
Probability Probability
Cost
Min. Max. Min. Max.
The term ‘Base cost’ used in this document refers to costs estimated either deterministically or
probabilistically, excluding any unforeseen/unforeseeable conditions, or uncertainties within the
defined Project Scope (which are calculated and covered separately in contingencies, as
explained in the relevant paragraph).
The term “Allowances”, which are additional resources included in estimates to cover the cost
of known but undefined requirements for an individual activity, work item, etc. More details
about Allowances are provided in the relevant para.
WEC are defined and selected to provide the level of accuracy required for each phase in
accordance with company policy for investments authorization.
Project Mangement required different breakdown structures to support the planning anc control
processes. Herebelow are recalled the most significant.
Development
Project
Drilling
Tangible Intangible Well site
rig Tangible Intangible Tangible Intangible
Company
Rig Casing Safety
Personnel Downtime Hole plugs Decomm.
valves
MOB + Restoration
Tubing Logistics X-mas tree Gradient Dismantling
DEMOB works
replacem. survey works
Surface Services
connections Washing Company
job Personnel
Utilities
Company
Personnel
Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) is a hierarchical structure, which allows the representation
of cost figures at different levels of detail.
CBS could be also the same than WBS or different if related to cost accounts or control items.
Other CBS examples are provided herebelow.
Project CAPEX
(Heavy) CBS
Dri lli ng Completion Completion
W orkover
Well W orking
Tangible Intangible
A bandoni ng Unit
Secure CB S CB S CB S
Well
Repeated under each
descending root
Rig
Tangible Intangible
Contractor
CB S CB S CB S
The CBS is a fundamental tool to support Wells Cost Estimating and Wells Cost Controlling; it
evolves with the project phases as indicated in the above figure.
Wells Cost Estimate and Wells Cost Budget should be prepared according to a cost accounting
(or coding) system, to simplify their generation and to support the Wells Cost Control.
Wells Cost Estimate coding examples are the cost classification provided under para 5; usually
to each cost item is assigned a code to better compare various project, to interface the cost
control system, etc.
Cost coding is also the link between Company Cost Accounting System and the project control
system: cost codes of accounts for DC&W are provided in Wells Cost Code Handbook.
In particular cost coding ensures the unambiguous relationship among cost estimate, cost
control and company accounting system.
In particular cost coding ensures the bijection between cost estimate elements and cost control
elements, cost control and cost accounts elements, and cost account and cost estimate
elements.
Cost estimate coding is also related to the Cost Breakdown Structure, where the cost codes
assign a “tag” to each cost element.
Cost
Controlling
BS
Cost
Accounting
Cost BS
Estimating
BS
Cost Data
Cost may be aggregated in different ways in the various CBS; nevertheless the lowest “cost
element” (corresponding to the Work Package as lowest WBS element, or eventually a further
breakdown) shall have a corresponding “cost element” in another CBS.
Particular care shall be paid when Company develops project in partnership (i.e. joint ventures)
with other oil companies. In order to assure the proper cost account, it should be established -
since the project beginning - the unambiguous relationship between Company cost code of
accounts and JV cost code of accounts.
Company cost JV cost code
code of accounts of accounts
XXX AAA
YYY BBB
ZZZ CCC
Wells cost is estimated summing the costs of the various resources used for the project.
The basic formula for estimating WC is:
WC = Σi (Qi • Ci)
where:
o Qi = quantity of element i
o Ci = unit cost of element i
with sum extended to all items (N); item may be either labour / material / service (or drilling /
tangible / intangible costs).
The determistic cost estimating buid-up formula may be represented as follows, showing all :
Well Cost
Cost Element 1
Cost Element 2
Cost Element Cost
… Element N
where contingency cost and quantity are expressed respectively as % of the amount between
square parenthesis.
The various “blocks” are developed and combined in different ways depending upon WCE
method applied in each project phase.
Probabilistic cost estimating scheme is represented under para Cost Risk Analysis.
Assumptions are all information and data on which the cost estimate relies, which are subject to
a certain degree of uncertainty, such as:
Drilling, seismic and geological / lithological data
Surface seismic data
Production life
Well type
Rig type
Well operational sequence
Well execution time estimate
Reservoir production scenario
Cost data
Risks identified
Efficiency in resources consumption
Rig market
Etc.
The more the assumptions are close to the real (future and true) cost figures; the better the cost
estimate will approximate the final cost.
Constrains are all limitations to which the project has to adhere to, such as:
Geographical constrains, topology and geological hazards
Budget
Company internal rules
Laws and regulations
JVs agreements
HSE requirements
Resource limitation
Weather, climate, etc.
Etc.
Constrains are often responsible of unneeded costs increases: Value Engineering process and
Constructability process can be applied to lower such costs.
In some cases the distinction between assumptions and constrains might overlap; a constrain
subject to a degree of uncertainty is also an assumption.
Cost estimate shall qualify the main assumptions and constrains on which are based.
9. SIMILITUDE CRITERIA
The estimate of unit cost requires the definition of quantitative similitude criteria to drive the
database inquiry.
The most important similitude criteria for Drilling operations are:
• Well Technical Outline: the number, size and interval depth of the drilling phases and
the eventual deviation profile
• Average Daily (Drilling) Progress: the average daily drilling progress for each drilling
phase, taking into account the drilling technique adopted (bit type, size, use of rotay /
mud motor) and the Rig type
• Time Required: the time required for logging, casing and cementing.
The similitude criteria shall define also the allowance range (+/- X%) of the acceptable data.
Cost drivers are the main variables influencing the final cost. Cost Estimating has to
comprehend and to account for the proper cost drivers of each activity or work package under
cost estimating to improve cost estimate accuracy.
The main drilling cost driver is time required to execute the various drilling activities. Time is
mainly influenced by:
Lithology
Drilling rig performance
One of the challenge faced in WCE is the definition of WCE drivers, the comprehension of how
these vary over time, and how these influence the cost estimate.
11. ALLOWANCES
Allowances cover events that are said to be “known-known”, i.e. events that always happen and
whose magnitude and probability are well known.
Example of allowance is the difference between casing length purchased and the casing length
calculated from well profile casing “take off”: said difference (technical allowance) accounts for
scrap, damage, theft, etc., which are known to happen on all projects.
This approach simplify the procedure of cost estimating such known and repetitive events. It
applies to all items under estimate provided that reliable data are available.
The development of reliable figures on allowances requires the statistical analysis of previous
projects’ data.
Cost Index is a number which relates the cost of an item at a specific time to the corresponding
cost at some arbitrarly specified time in the past.
Cost indexes support WCE providing cost data from similar projects developed at an earlier
date and updating these cost data to present time: thus cost indexes apply mainly for WCE in
Feasibility phase and Planning phases where cost data used come mainly from database and
publications. WCE during Unit Cost Revision relies upon bids from suppliers and contractors,
thus use of cost indexes are very limited.
Cost over time might vary for several reasons; most common drivers of such variation have
been identified under para Drilling Cost Drivers.
Cost indexes compare present cost with history; published or Company calculated data do not
forecast future escalation, that is left to the cost estimator evaluation.
Cost Year Y = Cost Year X • Cost Index Year Y / Cost Index Year X
The para Cost Escalation provides the technique on how to deal with future cost escalation.
Company internally developed cost indexes are based on database regularly updated by
feeding them with final project cost data and discarding elder ones which become misleading.
Location factor is an estimating factor used to convert the cost of an identical well from one
location to another. This factor takes into consideration the impact of climatic conditions, local
infrastructure, local soil conditions, safety and environmental regulations, taxation and
insurance regulations, resources availability and productivity, etc.
Location factors should support cost estimating when are well known the costs in a certain
country - usually company country or a nearby country - and the wells under cost estimating
should be developed in a country for which reliable cost data are unavailable.
Published data shall always be used with care, since these are:
o Affected by their underlying method of determination
o Inadequately explained
o Improperly dated
thus the estimator has to understand such limitations when using such data.
In addition such data reflect only the relative cost to replicate a well exactly in another location,
thus not considering cost effects introduced by site-unique conditions (i.e. access, local
transport, site conditions, etc.).
Company database elaboration provides more accurate location factors without the above
biases.
Soil
o Industry
Labour availability
Equipment availability
Labour productivity
o Infrastructures
Roads
Harbours
Air flight
o Etc.
Location factors are also considered in cost risk analysis when defining “base cost” and the
“impact of risk occurrence”.
With reference to Wells costs typical classification, location factors influence mainly:
• Wells site costs
• Tangible costs
• Intangible costs
and has limited influence on Drilling costs.
Cost escalation is the provision in actualised or estimated costs for an increase in the cost of
equipment, material, labour, etc., over that specified in the purchase order or contract due to
continuing price level change over time.
The most common use of cost escalation is to account for inflation impact, when using cost
data that refer to a certain “base time” (i.e. today’s cost or Base Cost) and these will be
expended in the future time, thus need to be “actualised”. A common technique to manage the
time value of money is to:
1. calculate the percentage of cost breakdown for the various cost items (cost weight %);
2. determine the rate of escalation for each item (based on judgement, published
forecasts, etc.);
3. based on project schedule, determine the “cost centroid” of each activity, and calculate
the escalation (escalation rate for time period x n° of time periods), according to the
formula:
with sum extended to all cost items (i) under estimate, where:
TPi = Time Period from Base Cost date to Cost Centroid expressed in years
Well Cost
The above figure represents the Cost-breakdown for the below scheme.
Cost
Centroid
Drilling
TPdrilling
Completion
TPcomple tion
With reference to Wells costs typical classification, Escalation should be considered for:
• Wells site costs
• Tangible costs
• Intangible costs
and do not for Drilling costs.
13. CONTINGENCIES
Contingency covers costs that may result from incomplete design, unforeseen/unforeseeable
conditions, or uncertainties within the defined project scope. The size of the contingency
depends on the status of wells engineering, procurement, and drilling works; and on the
complexity and uncertainties surrounding the wells to be drilled. Contingency is not to be used
to avoid carrying out proper cost estimates for wells component parts and operations.
Contingency covers “known-unknown” events, i.e. events known and whose magnitude and
probability is uncertain (unknown).
Contingency does not cover scope change and unforeseeable events not included in cost
estimates: these are separately approved, funded and managed using the Change Control
process.
where k is a value obtained by comparing the actual cost of a past project with its
original estimated cost.
where:
ki = contingency of cost element i
estimated costi = estimated cost of cost element i
This method is equal to the overall percentage, but is applied to each individual cost
element.
where:
ki = contingency of element i
estimated costi = estimated cost of element i
Pi = probability of occurrence of estimated cost of element i.
The paragraphs Cost Risk Analysis describe the process for calculating contingencies using the
output of probabilistic cost estimates.
This process is based on the cumulative cost vs. target cost curve described in the previous
paragraph. Often this curve is drawn in reverse because it renders the “not exceeding cost”
concept better. The software commercially available also includes this feature.
1.00 100%
Reverse Curve
0.50 50%
0.00 0%
Min. P(50/50) Target Cost Max.
Minimum and maximum Wells costs are easily calculated (sum of all Min. costs and of all Max.
costs of each item, respectively), so the curves are usually expressed in the form shown above.
Contingencies are estimated by defining the cumulated probability of “not exceeding” a certain
value i.e. 80% or whatever is Company/Project Policy, and then adding the contingency
required to achieve this objective.
100%
Estimated central value,
best estimate, base cost:
• mediane P(50/50)
20%
This representation of the cumulated probability of achieving the target cost suggests that
project definition can be improved. The effect of such an improvement is reflected by the
reduction in the confidence interval (CI – ref. to para Expected Accuracy Range). It should be
noted that when the difference between the min. and max. costs is zero, this estimate is equal
to a Deterministic Estimate.
The Expected Accuracy Range (EAR) is an indication of the degree to which the final cost
outcome for a given project will vary from the estimated cost.
As the level of Project definition increases, the cost estimation method selected may benefit
from the availability of increasingly detailed data / information. As a result, the expected
accuracy of the estimate tends to improve. This improvement in accuracy is the combined effect
of:
increasingly detailed and accurate data / information (i.e. level of Project definition);
Cost Estimating methods that take advantage of the increased detail of data /
information.
Project cost estimates should be carried out using cost estimating methods that are able to
provide the required levels of accuracy:
+ 40%
CAPEX expecte d accuracy
+ 25%
+ 15% + 10%
- 15% - 10%
- 25%
- 40%
The EAR of an estimate is traditionally expressed as a range of +/- X% around the point
estimate (before application of contingency in a deterministic estimate), and usually assumes a
certain level of confidence of the actual cost outcome falling within this range. In the above
figure the Gate 3 requires an EAR of +/- 15%.
The figure below shows the upper and lower boundaries of EAR (a probability of less than 10%
of overrun and underrun respectively - i.e. P(10/90) and P(90/10)).
+ 40 % - 25% + 2 5%
Hand Production &
Feasibility G1 Feasibility G2 Planning G3 Unit Cost
Revision R Execution
over close out
90/10
90/10 Accuracy Contingency
90/10 90/10
Base Cost
50/50
90/10 90/10
10/90
10/90
This means that a cost estimate output for Planning phase of 1000 (units of currency), with an
EAR of +/- 15%, has a 10% probability of exceeding 1150 [(1000 x (1 + 15%)], and a 10%
probability of being lower than 850 [(1000 x (1 - 15%)].
It is recognised that in the absence of reliable probabilistic cost estimates, the purpose of the
definition given to confidence level indicators or the boundaries of the accuracy range is
somewhat limited. It does, however, provide a basis for the consistent use of estimating
terminology and definitions and thus for the future validation of current practice with regard to
accuracy and contingency.
____________________________________________________________________________
Confidence Interval and Scope Definition
Cumulated Probability of
Target Cost Overrun
100%
B
A B C
Min. Max.
CI C Target Cost
CI B
CI A
The better the Wells Project Scope is defined lesser will be CI spread.
To verify that the current Wells Project Scope and relevant estimate have reached the EAR
required for Project Sanction, the following shall be verified.
Cumulated Probability
of Target Cost Overrun
100%
1.(Cmax-Cmin)/Cbase≤0.30
2.(Cbase-Cmin)/Cbase≤0.15
50% 3.(Cmax-Cbase)/Cbase≤0.15
10%
If the above conditions are not verified the Wells Project definition should be increased to
improve the EAR.
Deterministic Cost Estimate do not allow said analysis since each cost item is a fixed value,
thus the distribution probability and the CI cannot be defined.
EAR is an indication of the degree to which the final cost outcome for a given project will vary
from the estimated cost.
WCE EAR has a different shape that that shown in the relevant figure; in fact WCE factors cost
and quantity have different behaviours throughout the various project phases:
o Quantity figures are mainly affected by technical definition and data from exploration
wells and subsequent drilling and completion study and wells engineering
o Unit Cost figures are influenced by type (induced by technical definition) / cost of rig
(relevant to type and market conditions) and relevant finalisation through purchase
order award to contractors.
Quantity
Unit Cost
effect of
P.O. award
Cost Estimate relies upon quantity estimate and cost data to develop cost estimates. Examples
of cost data are:
o Unit cost (labour, material and equipment)
o Service cost as function of type / size
o Escalation
o Trend of cost expenditure vs. time
o Location factors
o Efficiency in resources expenditure
o Etc.
Since cost data are main “building blocks” in cost estimating it is fundamental to:
o Easily access applicable cost data
o Properly account project cost expenditure to feed company database
o Elaborate cost data to infer relationships (i.e. correlation) between activities, risks,
efficiency, etc. and costs
Time influences value: equal amount of money received (or spent) at different times do not
have equal value; to compare or add them accurately they must be reduced to a common time
reference point.
If an amount of money P, earns interests “i” (expressed in decimal point form) for a specified
time period, its value at the end of that time period becomes:
F1 = P (1+i)
where F1 is the future value after one time period. The equation extended to “n” time periods is:
F = P (1+i)+/- n
The exponent is positive if time is moving with the calendar and negative if it is moving against
the calendar.
The most common time period used is the year, although any time period can be used for
compounding interests.
These formulas account only for time value of money; a common problem in cost estimating is
the comparison of past data with current figures; this is made by using the above formula and
using the “yearly escalation rate” (eventually applied on annual time intervals, when it is
changing over the time interval under analysis); when such “yearly escalation rate” for the cost
items under evaluation are not available, “i” could be used with reasonable approximation
(exept for drilling cost).
CAPEX are all costs attributable to the creation of a permanent or fixed asset. CAPEX with
respect to Wells Costs - sometimes referred to as DRILLEX - are the cost sustained for creating
new wells.
OPEX are all expenditures incurred in the operation and maintenance of an asset. OPEX with
respect to Wells Costs, are cost incurred to operate and maintain the wells during the
production life.
DECAB are all costs incurred at the end of production life in dismantling facilities, abandoning
wells, disposing of materials, decontaminating the area, and restoring the site in accordance
with requirements expressed in local law, regulations and consents.
CAPEX, OPEX and DECAB cost estimating are the three main cost items to be estimated for
each phase.
The cost estimating of these three items require different input, techniques and supporting
tools: these are detailed under the relevant Wells Cost Estimating Guidelines.
CAPEX
Cumulative Costs
DECAB
OPEX
Cost risk analysis (or probabilistic cost estimating) relies upon probability distribution for each
cost item.
Each cost element is subject to a certain degree of uncertainty due to several reasons, such as:
Required resources
Quantity estimate
Unit price estimate
Scope definition
Etc.
The root causes of these uncertainties drive the project risk analysis and in particular the cost
risk analysis. A list of typical project risks is given under Annex 1.
Objective of cost risk analysis is to improve the confidence of achieving a target cost or “not
exceeding” a defined cost value.
Cost risk analysis is a complex task and applies when wells cost estimate requires a
probabilistic approach, such as when there is a high uncertainty on:
Lithology
Drilling rig performance (type availability), cost
Etc.
or when:
CAPEX estimate qualifies - according to defined company criteria - for cost risk
analysis
Project partners - JV Agreements so require
Etc.
The decision about using cost risk analysis should be made at the beginning of the cost
estimating process.
Probabilistic cost estimating relies upon probability distribution for each cost element.
The histogram below provides an example of probability (p) versus cost (€) distribution. The
continuous curve represents the cumulated probability of “not exceeding” the cost value.
When P(50/50) or other probability reference values are used (e.g. P(10/90), P(90/10)) it must
be made clear whether they refer to probability distribution or to cumulated probability
distribution; in this document references are made clearly.
When the probability distribution must be expressed as a single-value estimate, Expected Value
may be used (the probability-weighted average). Expected Value is the best single-point value
estimate, because it is an objective (unbiased) representation of a probability distribution.
________________________________________________________________________
Probabilistic Cost Estimating
5 0 /5 0
p 90
10
In order to obtain a total estimate, the sum of the effect of the various probability distribution
functions for all cost elements needs to be calculated. To do this, software such as the Monte
Carlo simulation that produces a cumulative probability distribution curve of target cost
achievement may be used.
When the cost impact (in probabilistic terms) of risk occurrence with their probability
distributions are added to the “base cost” of each item (in probabilistic terms), the cost model
generated for the item provides a complete representation of the item’s cost.
__________________________________________________________________
Item Cost Estimate
Probability
ELEMENT
COST
ESTIMATE Cost
Min. Max.
Probability
Cost
Probability PROBABILITY Min.
Max.
BASE COST and
IMPACT
PROBABILITY
Cost
Min. Max. RISK n° 1 and
i.e. P(10/90) i.e P(90/10) IMPACT
PROBABILITY
RISK n° 2 and
IMPACT
PROBABILITY
RISK n° … and
IMPACT
RISK n° N
__________________________________________________________________
Subsequently, by summing (in probabilistic terms) the distribution costs of all elements, the
model provides the cumulated probability curve of cost achievement.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Cost Item Summing
CBS
COST ESTIMATE
ELEMENT n°COST
1 ESTIMATE
ELEMENT n°COST
2 ESTIMATE
ELEMENT n°…
COST ESTIMATE
ELEMENT n° M
PROBABILITY
andPROBABILITY
PLANNED IMPACT RISKand
SCOPE COST n° 1IMPACT PROBABILITY
RISK and
n° 2IMPACT PROBABILITY
RISK and
n° …IMPACT RISK
n° N
__________________________________________________________________
Cumulated Probability vs. Target Cost
Cumulated Probability
1.0
0.5
0.0
Min. P(50/50) Max.
Target Cost
__________________________________________________________________
The Cumulative Probability vs. Target Cost curves can be plotted for various project
alternatives, in order to highlight the significant cost characteristics each one.
This curve may also be usefully applied in calculating contingencies (as explained in the
relevant paragraph).
In the following paragraphs the Minimum cost coincides with the origin of the graph, since the
focus is on the variable part of the estimate.
Project approval for execution (Gate 3) requires the achievement of +/- 15% EAR.
In case of probabilistic cost estimating (or cost risk analysis) and detailed contingency definition
supported by risk analysis, it is possible to verify whether the estimate has reached the required
EAR by verifying CI spread.
The reasons of EAR improvement through the project phases have been explained under
paragraph Expected Accuracy Range.
Cumulated Probability of
Target Cost Overrun
100%
B
A B C
Min. Max.
CI C Target Cost
CI B
CI A
To verify that the current Project Scope and relevant estimate have reached the EAR required
for Project Sanction, the following shall be verified.
Cumulated Probability
of Target Cost Overrun
100%
1.(Cmax-Cmin)/Cbase≤0.30
2.(Cbase-Cmin)/Cbase≤0.15
50% 3.(Cmax-Cbase)/Cbase≤0.15
10%
If the above conditions are not verified the Project definition should be increased in order to
improve the EAR.
Deterministic Cost Estimate do not allow said analysis since each cost item is a fixed value,
thus the distribution probability and the CI cannot be defined.
Cost budgeting is the process of time-phasing (and/or depth phasing) the cost expenditures for
all CBS elements.
Each CBS element under Cost Budgeting requires the allocation of resources consumption and
relevant cost expenditure over time / depth.
The figure below shows the above mentioned distributions and relevant cumulative curves.
Cost
Linear’s
Cumulative
Uniform’s
Start of Cumulative
Period End of Period
Cumulative & Cumulative
Start of
Period Linear
Centroid of Period
& Cumulative
Uniform
Operation X
Start Finish
Time / Depth
In particular, when a high degree of precision is not required, a linear cumulative cost can be
assumed as model; this is done assigning all costs at the end of the period, and applying a
triangular distribution of cost cumulative from start to finish.
Cost
Operation
Total Cost
Activity N
Operation
Total Cost
Cumulative Activity …
Activity B
Activity A
Operation X
Start Finish
Time / Depth
The aggregation (sum-up) of the cost budgets of all CBS elements is made by summing the
cost budgets of all cost elements.
When a triangular distribution of cost cumulative from start to finish is used, these can be
summed-up as shown in the figure below.
Cost
Operation N
Operation A Operation N
Total Cost
Operation B
Total Cost
Operation A
Total Cost
Time / Depth
Wells are always part of a bigger project that includes other facilities such as onshore / offshore
/ sub sea facilities, terminals, pipelines, etc.
To avoid duplications and/or voids in the cost estimate this handbook indicates the battery limits
of wells cost estimate, in terms of scope of work and general/common cost items.
In general terms the following battery limit apply between Wells and Facilities cost estimating:
1. Rig site preparation is included in WCE (i.e. access roads, rig site, fence, waste pit,
celler, cost of right of access and land lease); cost of oil concession, access roads
upgrading , etc., are excluded
2. Christmas tree is include in WCE; cost of flow line, shutdown safety valves, control
panels, etc. installed on the flow line, are excluded
3. for Well Head and Christmas Tree subsea installation Wells Head is included in
WCE; cost of Christmas tree is excluded
4. Logistics: up these are used for Wells drilling and completion works are included in
WCE.
Depending upon project scope, some site facilities or logistics might be shared between wells
drilling and facilities construction; examples follow:
o Transport facilities
o Site offices, canteen, personnel accommodation facilities, first aid, etc.
o Etc.
Before cost estimate is initiated such clarification is required.
ANNEXES
n F
F=P(1+i)
Single Payment
-n
P=F(1+i)
P
F
F = [ Ub (1+i)] • [(1+i)n-1] /i
Ub Ub Ub Ub Ub
F
F = Ue[(1+i)n-1]/i
Ue Ue Ue Ue Ue
SECTION 2
INDEX
1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................3
1. INTRODUCTION
This section supports the understanding of the terms used in Wells Cost section, Wells Cost
Estimating section, Wells Cost Controlling section, Wells Cost Code section.
scope.
Take off A specific method for identifying and recording from
drawings and specifications the material and quantities
required for estimating the cost to fully execute an
activity, operation or project.
Time The time frame (start-finish) in which all project activities -
and the entire project shall be performed.
Timenow Date specified as current for carrying out an evaluation Timenow
of the actual costs for operations executed during a (DMS)
exploration or development project.
Time Baseline The original approved plan (for a project, an operation, Time Baseline
or an activity) which defines and qualifies the project’s (DMS)
time.
Unit Cost
Update WCE The revision to a previously issued WCE without -
modifying the total cost of the DC&W cost of the project.
It requires only modification to CBS cost elements’ cost.
Variance Difference between planned values and actual values. Variance (DMS)
Wells Cost The original approved plan (for a project, a operation -
Baseline (WCB) package, or an activity) which defines and qualifies the
Wells Cost Estimate (WCE).
Wells Cost The cost estimate of an activity, a group of activities or -
Estimate (WCE) operations or project planned or scheduled to have been
completed or of services planned or scheduled to have
been performed.
In other words is the estimated cost expenditure of each
cost element of the CBS as output of the Cost
Estimating process (Cost Estimating for the Feasibility
phase, for the Planning phase and for the Unit Cost
Revision phase).
Other definition: An evaluation the cost of resources
needed to execute and complete an activity a group of
activities (operations), or the project relevant to DC&W
operations.
Wells Cost The Wells Cost Estimate at the Depthnow or Timenow -
Estimate@ at which the cost control is performed.
Working Phase The upper level of the Time Breakdown of a Well. -
Further breakdowns are: Operation and Activity.
SECTION 3
INDEX
1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................3
3. PROCESS OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................5
1. INTRODUCTION
This section supports DC&W Cost Estimating (CEA) during Feasibility phase.
The figure below shows the project phase in which this section applies.
Document Number:
Wells
Execution &
Completion
Cost Estimating is the process of evaluating the cost of resources needed to execute and
complete an activity a group of activities, or the project relevant to DC&W operations.
In particular DC&W CEA for Feasibility phases is the process carried out to issue the best Wells
Cost Estimate based on limited technical data and information developed during the Drilling &
Completion study.
The objective of such process is to enable Project Team to issue the most reliable WCE at
this phase.
WCE supports also the “go-no go” decision about the Project.
Cost Estimating for Feasibility phase receives input and provides output to planning (both to
planning and scheduling). It includes also Cost Budgeting.
Cost Control
Pl a n
gre ss
ni ng
& Pro
&S
g
che
dule
t ori n
PLANNING &
dul i
Sche
Moni
CONTROL CYCLE
ng
Co g
st in
Bu at
t im
dg s
et
in stE
g
Co
3. PROCESS OVERVIEW
WRB Review
and Appraisal
Estimate
Identify and Estimate Unit Cost
Drilling and
Select of
Completion Tech.
Similar Wells Similar Wells
Characteristics
Input
Output
Input
Output
WSB = Wells Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The first step of DC&W CEA for Feasibility phase is WSB, WTB and WRB Review and
Appraisal.
WSB, WTB and WRB Review and Appraisal Step Work flow
OTHER PROCESSES
Collect Data
WRB Review Go to next step
and Documents
and Appraisal
WSB = Wells Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The second step of DC&W CEA for Feasibility phase is Select CBS for Cost Estimating
purpose.
YES
Define
custom CBS
Custom CBS
Approval
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Well Cost Baseline; WSB = Wells Scope Baseline; WTB = Well Time Baseline; WRB = Well Resources Baseline
Well… i
WCE developent with lower CBS cost elements at G2 (Gate 2) than that at G1 (Gate 1)
become feasible only if relevant technical data and information to support such estimate are
available.
The third step of DC&W CEA for Feasibility phase is Estimate Drilling and Completion
Technical Characteristics.
Estimate Drilling
Technical
Characteristics
FEASIBILITY PHASE WELLS COST ESTIMATING
Estimate
Completion
Technical
Characteristics
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; WSB = Well Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
Some of these technical characteristics might not be available at the earlier project phases,
thus the WCE shall be based only on the data and information available and on the required
assumptions.
The fourth step of DC&W CEA for Feasibility phase is Identify and Select Similar Wells.
Define
Inquiry Database
Quantitative Extract Short List
From previous step through Go to next step
Similitude Similar Wells Similar Wells
Similitudes
Criteria
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; WSB = Well Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
Similitude Criteria
Database Inquiry
The similar wells (or parts thereof) identified shall be identified and listed for further
considerations.
The similar wells identified, shall be short listed according to a defined criteria (i.e. closer
range value with respect to defined allowance range for acceptable data, same country,
lytology, confidence on data reliability, etc.).
The fifth step of DC&W CEA for Feasibility phase is Estimate Unit Cost.
Extract from
Calulate Calculate
Similar Wells
From previous step Unit C ost Actualised Go to next step
Comparable
“when performend” Unit C ost
Operations
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; WSB = Well Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The sixth step of DC&W CEA for Feasibility phase is Estimate Cost.
Σ
Calculate
Calculate
From previous step Total Cost of each Go to next step
Total Cost
CBS Element
O utput
Π
Quantity
X
Unit C ost
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; WSB = Well Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The seventh step of DC&W CEA for Feasibility phase is Cost Budgeting.
Depth / Time
Get Schedule
From previous step phasing of Go to next step
of Operations
Cost Expenditures
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; WSB = Well Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
Each CBS element under Cost Budgeting requires the allocation of cost expenditure over
time / depth.
The figure below shows the above mentioned distribution and relevant cumulative curve.
Cost
Uniform’s
Cumulative
Uniform
Operation X
Start Finish
Time / Depth
Whe more than one operation must be considered, the cost distribution of the various parts
shall be summed.
The figure below shows the above described approach.
Cost
Well
Total
Completion Cost
Operation Cost
Cumulative
Drilling
Operation Cost
Cumulative
Start Finish
Time / Depth
The eighth step of DC&W CEA for Feasibility phase is Cost Budgeting.
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; WSB = Well Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
SECTION 4
INDEX
1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................3
3. PROCESS OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................5
1. INTRODUCTION
This section supports DC&W Cost Estimating (CEA) during Planning phase.
The figure below shows the project phase in which this section apllies.
Document Number:
Wells
Execution &
Completion
Cost Estimating is the process of evaluating the cost of resources needed to execute and
complete an activity a group of activities, or the project relevant to DC&W operations.
In particular DC&W CEA for Planning phase is the process carried out to develop the Wells
Cost Estimate based on more detailed and precise technical data and information developed
during the Wells Engineering.
The objective of such process is to enable Project Team to issue the most reliable WCB and
WCE for the Cost Control during Execution phase (although revised during Unit Cost
Revision phase).
This ensures the definition of more realistic cost objectives (WCE and WCB) for the
Project.
WCE supports also the “go-no go” decision about the Project.
Cost Estimating for Planning phase receives input and provides output to planning (both to
planning and scheduling and to cost controlling). It includes also Cost Budgeting.
Cost Control
Pl a n
gress
ning
Moni le & Pro
&S
g
che
t ori n
du
PLANNING &
duli
Sche
CONTROL CYCLE
ng
Co g
in
st
Bu at
t im
dg s
et
stE
in
g Co
3. PROCESS OVERVIEW
Wells Cost Estimating for Feasibility & Planning Phases Process Workflow
OTHER PROCESSE S
WRB Review
O utput
and Appraisal
Input
O utput
DC&W Dept.
Cost Database
WSB = Wells Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The first step of DC&W CEA for Planning phase is WSB, WTB and WRB Review and
Appraisal.
WSB = Wells Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The second step of DC&W CEA for Planning phase is Select CBS for Cost Estimating.
YES
Define
custom CBS
Custom CBS
Approval
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Well Cost Baseline; WSB = Wells Scope Baseline; WTB = Well Time Baseline; WRB = Well Resources Baseline
Well… i
Moving Phase ∅ i
Working
Tangibl e Int angible
Unit
CB S CB S CB S
Rig
Tangibl e Int angible
Cont ract or
CB S CB S CB S
The third step of DC&W CEA for Planning phase is Estimate Quantity and Type or Resources
required for the Project.
Σ
Calculate
Total Quantity
of Resources
Go to next step
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; WSB = Well Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The figure below shows quantity estimate with respect to CBS element cost estimate.
Well Cost
Cost Element 1
Cost Element 2
Cost Ele ment …
Cost Element N
The figure below provides a template to follow for estimating quantity and type of resources for
each CBS element.
Description Code
Type Quantity
Base Quantity is the quantity of Resources required without Allowance and/or Contingency. It
is calculated from specifications, drawings, contractors bids (same or other similar projects),
DC&W Dept. database, etc.
Allowance Quantity covers events that always happen, but is more practical to account for
these as percentage of Base Quantity, then including the same within the Base Quantity (i.e.
Allowance Quantity = Base Quantity x A%)
Example of Allowance Quantity is the difference between casing length purchased and the
casing length calculated from well profile casing “take off”: said difference (technical allowance)
accounts for scrap, damage, theft, etc., which are known to happen on all projects.
Contingency Quantity accounts for events that may result from incomplete design,
unforeseen/unforeseeable conditions, or uncertainties within the defined project scope. The
size of the contingency depends on the status of wells engineering, procurement, and drilling
operations; and on the complexity and uncertainties surrounding the Wells to be drilled.
Contingency is not to be used to avoid carrying out proper cost estimates for wells component
parts and / or operations.
Contingency on quantity highlights two of its fundamental aspects:
• It covers unforeseeable quantities
• It covers uncertainties relevant to quantities within the defined Project scope
Contingency does not cover scope change and unforeseeable events not included in cost
estimates: these are separately approved, funded and managed using the Cost Control
process.
These are often accounted for multiplying the (Base + Allowance) Quantity by a C% factor < 1.
C% is derived from quantity analysis of previous similar projects, eventually readjusted for the
specific needs of the well.
The fourth step of DC&W CEA for Feasibility & Planning phases is Estimate Unit Cost.
Path 2
• To get existing contracts
• To extract Unit Cost
The two path are alternative one to the other; path 2 implies that the unit cost get the
contract(s) available is reliable and no further correction is developed (i.e. escalation and / or
contingency).
Query DC &W
Identify Well’s Define
Database for Extract
From previous step Main Quantitative
Similar Well Similar Wells
Characteristics Similitude Criteria
Cost Data
Path 1
PLA NNING PHA SE WE LLS COST E ST IMAT ING
Σ
Calculate
Get Existing Unit C ost
Extract Unit Cost of Resources
Contracts
Path 2
Go to next step
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; WSB = Well Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The figure below shows unit cost estimate with respect to CBS element cost estimate.
Well Cost
Cost Element 1
Cost Element 2
Cost Element …
Cost Element N
Description Code
Type Cost
Escalation Cost covers an increase in the cost of service, material, labour, etc., over that
accounted in the cost database or specified in the purchase order or contract due to continuing
price level change over time.
Escalation Costi = Base Costi {[Cost Weighti % x (1.00 + YERi)TPi] - 1}
TPi = Time Period from Base Cost date to Cost Centroid expressed in years
Details about Escalation Cost are provided in the relevant paragraph of Wells Cost Handbook.
Contingency Cost accounts for events that may influence the unit cost estimated from incomplete
design, unforeseen/unforeseeable conditions, or uncertainties within the defined project scope (i.e.
rig contractor daily cost, unit cost of casing, etc.).
Contingency on quantity highlights two of its fundamental aspects:
• It covers unforeseeable unit costs
• It covers uncertainties relevant to unit cost within the defined Project scope
Contingency does not cover scope change and unforeseeable events not included in cost
estimates: these are separately approved, funded and managed using the Cost Control process.
These are often accounted for multiplying the (Base + Escalation) Cost by a C% factor < 1.
C% is derived from unit cost analysis of previous similar projects, eventually readjusted for the
specific needs of the well.
The fifth step of DC&W CEA for Planning phase is Estimate Cost.
Σ
Calculate Calculate
From previous step Total Cost of each Total Cost Go to next step
CBS Element of Resources
O utput
Π
Quantity
X
Unit C ost
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; WSB = Well Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The sixth step of DC&W CEA for Planning phase is Cost Budgeting.
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; WSB = Well Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
In particular, when a high degree of precision is not required, a linear cumulative cost can be
assumed as model; this is done assigning all costs at the end of the period, and applying a
triangular distribution of cost cumulative from start to finish.
Cost
Operation
Total Cost
Operation
Cost Budget
Operation X
Start Finish
Time / Depth
For drilling operations, the cost budgeting is developed as follows:
Time / Depth
Start
Drilling Phase
Drilling
Phase’s
Cost Budget
Drilling
Phase’s
Operations
Total Cost
Finish
Cost
SECTION 4 of Cost Estimating, Budgeting and Controlling Handbook
Wells Cost Estimating for Planning Phase
SPEO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAG 19 OF 22
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division REVISION
STAP-G-1-M-14483 0
For operations carried out among the various drilling phases which do not modify the depth, the
cost budgeting is developed as follows:
Time Depth
Start
Operation
Operation Cost
Operation
and Cost Budget
Cost Budget
Operation
Cost
For completion operations the cost budgeting is developed as follows:
Time Operation
Total Cost
Finish
Operatiion
Operation
Cost Budget
Start
Cost
The overall WCE and Well Cost Budget can be represented in Depth vs. Cost or Time vs. Cost
diagram, as follows:
Operations’
Depth Cost Budget
O
D
Legenda:
D = Drilling
O
O = Other operations between
drilling phases
C = Completion
Operation
Cost
Cost
Operations’
Time Cost Budget
Legenda:
D
D = Drilling
O = Other operations between
O drilling phases
C = Completion
Operation C
Cost
Cost
SECTION 4 of Cost Estimating, Budgeting and Controlling Handbook
Wells Cost Estimating for Planning Phase
SPEO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAG 21 OF 22
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division REVISION
STAP-G-1-M-14483 0
The seventh step of DC&W CEA for Planning phase is WCE and WCB Approval.
Annex 1 suggests the reporting form for WCE and Budget submission for Management
approval.
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; WSB = Well Scope Baseline; WTB = Wells Time baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
Note: further WCE details are available up to lowest CBS cost element.
SECTION 5
INDEX
1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................3
3. PROCESS OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................5
1. INTRODUCTION
This section supports DC&W Cost Estimating (CEA) during Unit Cost Revision phase.
The figure below shows the project phase in which this section applies.
Document Number:
WCE + 1 5% - 10 % + 1 0%
- 15 %
Wells
Execution &
Completion
Cost Estimating is the process of evaluating the cost of resources needed to execute and
complete an activity a group of activities, or the project relevant to DC&W works.
In particular DC&W CEA for Unit Cost Revision Phase is the process carried out to verify,
before the Execution Phase, that WCE carried out during Feasibility & Planning phases are still
valid, identify variances if any and revise Wells Cost Estimate (WCE) and Wells Cost Baseline
(WCB) as needed.
This handbook provides guidance with respect to variances originated by procurement, while
Wells Cost Estimating Handbook for Feasibility and Planning phases provides guidance to
variances originated by wells programs update.
The objective of such process is to early highlight cost variations with respect to previous
WCB/WCE, so to enable Project Team to issue the most reliable WCB and WCE for the
Cost Control during Execution phase.
This ensures the definition of more realistic cost objectives (WCE and WCB) for the
Project.
Cost Estimating for Unit Cost Revision phase receives input and provides output to planning
(both to planning and scheduling and to cost controlling).
Cost Control
Pla
gress
nnin
Moni l e & Pro
g
&S
g
che
tori n
du
PLANNING &
dul
Sche
ing
CONTROL CYCLE
Co g
st t in
Bu a
t im
dg
et t Es
in s
g Co
3. PROCESS OVERVIEW
Main step of Cost Estimating for Unit Cost Revision phase are:
Wells Cost Estimating for Unit Cost Revision Phase Process Workflow
FEASIBILITY &
PLANNING
OTHER PROCESSES
WC E and WCB
Review and Inputs from
Appraisal Procurement
Identify and
Analyse
Variances
NO
Variances
STOP
Identified?
YES Approval of
Quantify Effect
Revise WCB / WCE revised
of Variances on
and Cost Budget WCB / WCE and
WC E Elements
Cost Budget
WSE = Wells Scopre Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The first step of DC&W CEA for Unit Cost Revision phase is Input from Procurement.
FEASIBILITY &
PLANNING
OTHER PROCESSES
Evaluate for
Collect all
each Contract Unit
Go to next step Contracts for
Prices and
DC&W Operations
Forfait Prices
WSE = Wells Scopre Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The fifth step of DC&W CEA for Unit Cost Revision phase is Well Cost Estimate and WRB
Review and Appraisal.
FEASIBILITY &
PLANNING
OTHER PROCESSES
Collect WCE
Inputs from
and WCB
Procurement
Documentation
UNIT COST REVISION PHASE WELLS COST ESTIMATING
Compare WC E
with
Unit Prices and
Forfait Prices
Go to Identify
and Analyse
Variances
WSE = Wells Scopre Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The sixth step of DC&W CEA for Unit Cost Revision phase is Identify and Analyse Variances.
WSE = Wells Scopre Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The seventh step of DC&W CEA for Unit Cost Revision phase is Quantify Effect of Variances
on WCE Elements.
Go to Revise
Input from Calculate
WCB / WCE and
Previous Step revised Cost
Cost Budget
WSE = Wells Scopre Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The eighth step of DC&W CEA for Unit Cost Revision phase is Revise WCB / WCE and Cost
Budget.
Go to Approval of
Input from Sum all Revise
revised WCB / WCE
Previous Step Cost Elements Cost Budget
and Cost Budget
WSE = Wells Scopre Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
The ninth step of DC&W CEA for Unit Cost Revision phase is Revise WCB / WCE and Cost
Budget.
WSE = Wells Scopre Baseline; WTB = Wells Time Baseline; WRB = Wells Resources Baseline
SECTION 6
INDEX
1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................4
6. PROCESS OVERVIEW...................................................................................................11
1. INTRODUCTION
This section supports Drilling Completion & Workover (DC&W) Cost Control (COSTC) during
Execution phase.
The figure below shows the project phase in which this section applies.
Document Number:
Wells
Execution &
Completion
Cost Control is the process of controlling changes to the project’s cost estimate.
In other words, DC&W COSTC is the process carried out to verify, according to a defined
frequency, that actual project’s costs figures (AC) trends are in line with Wells Cost Estimate
(WCE) and Wells Cost Baseline (WCB).
The objective of such process is to early highlight cost variations, so to enable Project Team to
define and implement corrective actions to guarantee that cost objectives (WCE and
WCB) are met through the entire Project Life Cycle.
Cost controlling receives input and provides output to planning (both to planning and scheduling
and to cost estimating and budgeting).
Cost Control P l an
gress
ni ng
Moni l e & Pro
&S
g
che
t ori n
du
PLANNING &
dul i
Sche
CONTROL CYCLE
ng
Co g
st in
Bu at
dg im
et Est
in st
g
Co
The following cost types are used during DC&W COSTC process:
Wells Cost Estimate (WCE): the cost estimate of an activity, a group of activities or
project (operations) planned or scheduled to have been completed or of services
planned or scheduled to have been performed.
In other words is the estimated cost expenditure of each cost element of the CBS as
output of the Cost Estimating process (Cost Estimating for the Feasibility and Planning
Phases and Unit Cost Revision phase).
Wells Cost Baseline (WCB): the original approved plan (for a project, an operation
package, or an activity) which defines and qualifies the Wells Cost Estimate (WCE).
Accounted Cost: cost incurred for the activities or operations as recorded in Company
Accounting System (CAS).
Actual Cost (AC): known cost of an activity, a group of activities or project (operations)
actually performed up to Depthnow / Timenow.
Accrued Cost: value of the Actual Cost (of operations) calculated summing the
accounted value plus an estimate by the Project Team; also called Value of Operation
Done.
Estimate To Finish (ETF): the expected additional cost needed to complete an activity,
a group of activities, or the project.
Estimate At Finish (EAF): the expected total cost of an activity, a group of activities, or
the project when the defined scope of operation has been finished. Most techniques for
forecasting EAF include some adjustment of the original cost estimate, based on actual
project performance to date; also called Expected Final Cost (EFC).
Final Cost: the total cost expenditure incurred for the resources utilised to execute and
complete the project activities. It can be valued only at the end of the project, operation,
or activity.
All cost types defined above shall be managed either as single figures or as cost expenditures
curves; the single figure is the integer of cost expenditures.
More details on various types of costs can be found in Wells Cost Handbook.
The objective of DC&W COSTC process is to early highlight cost variations, so to enable
Project Team to define and implement corrective actions to guarantee that cost
objectives (WCB and WCE) are met through the entire Project Life Cycle.
Cost accounting is the historical reporting of actual and / or committed cost on a project. Costs
are denoted and segregated within cost codes that are defined in a chart of accounts.
Cost accounting requires that cost data are inputted in Company Accounting System (CAS)
based on Company Cost Code of Accounts: the purpose is to aggregate accounted costs under
cost codes defined mainly for accounting and financial purposes.
In project control practice, cost accounting is the step performed by the Project Team for the
collection of actual cost data and their input in the proper item of the Cost Breakdown Structure;
this constitutes the basis to compare then actual versus estimated costs.
Since the use of term of cost accounting in cost control practice might create misunderstanding
with the routine accounting activity, this is not used in cost control.
To meet cost control objective, cost accounting is only a transient step; if cost control is limited
to cost accounting it can’t provide the required analysis of project performance, thus can’t
enable the project team in defining the corrective actions to guarantee cost objectives are met.
Cost Breakdown Structure CBS is the hierarchical cost structure, which allows the
representation of budget figures at different levels of detail.
CBS is the basic tool for cost control. Its definition must allow the generation of data that
provide the required knowledge of the project status.
Standard CBS has been developed and is advisable to use the same on all projects: this will
enable to acquire comparable cost data relevant to various projects.
Following para describe standard CBS for CAPEX, OPEX and DECAB.
Different CBS can be defined and used in particular cases (i.e. JV, etc.) to meet all partners
requirements: in these cases it is advisable at least to re-classify cost data according to
Company standard CBS to properly feed project cost database.
CAPEX CBS used for Exploration and Development Projects is described in the figure below.
Project CAPEX
(Heavy) CBS
Drilli ng Comp let ion Complet ion
W orkove r
W ell W orki ng
Tangibl e Int angible
A bandoni ng Unit
Secure CB S CB S CB S
W ell
Repeated under each
descending root
Rig
Tangibl e Int angible
Cont ract or
CB S CB S CB S
More details on CBS for CAPEX can be found in Cost Codes Handbook.
OPEX CBS used for Exploration and Development Projects is described in the figure below.
Project OPEX
Moving Moving
Preliminary Preliminary
Completion Completion
Well Well
Test ing Test ing
Secure Secure
Well Well
Rig
Tangible Intangible Working
Tangible Int angible
Contract or Unit
CBS CB S CB S CB S CB S CB S
DECAB CBS used for Exploration and Development Projects is described in the figure below.
Project DECAB
Movi ng Moving
Well Well
A bando ni ng A bandoni ng
Rig W orki ng
Tangible Intangible
Tangibl e Int angible Unit
Co nt ractor
CB S CB S CB S
CB S CB S CB S
The CBS shown in the previous para apply (as Company standard CBS) to DC&W Cost
Controlling process.
The CBS used in the previous DC&W Cost Estimating does not show the various Time Phases.
At the beginning of the Execution phase the Project Team shall further detail the CBS by
estimating also the costs according to the further breakdown provided through the Time
Phases.
The figure below shows the CBS development throughout the various project phases.
Project CAPEX
(Heavy) CBS
Drilli ng Completion Completion
Workove r
Preliminary
Re-entry
Well Well Well
Testing Testing Testing
Drilling
Secure Secure Secure
Well Well Well
Well
Testing
Well Working
Tangible Intangible
A bandoning Unit
Secure CB S CB S CB S
Well
Repeated under each
descending root
Rig
Tangible Intangible
Contractor
CB S CB S CB S
6. PROCESS OVERVIEW
Review and appraisal of WCE and WCB (as output of Cost Estimating developed at the
end of Unit Cost Revision phase)
Select Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) for Cost Control
Assign Wells Cost Estimate (WCE) to CBS Cost Elements
Collect Actual Cost (AC) Data
Compare AC with WCE
Calculate cost indexes (CV, CI)
Estimate Cost To Finish (ETF and Estimate Cost At Finish (EAF)
Identify and Analyse Cost Variances
Update Wells Cost Estimate (WCE)
Define and propose corrective actions
Revised WCB/WCE development and approval
Cost Reporting
Update estimate
Project Appraise
• WCE Operations and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
YES
Input Cost Data in
Assign WCE
Monitoring System: Calculate
to CBS Update WCE
Compare AC Cost Indexes
Cost Elements
WELLS COST CONTROLLING
Collect AC Data
NO
AND / OR
Revised Project
Data from Cost Reporting
Best Estimate WCB required?
Company
based on Work
Accounting
Performed
System YES
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; CBS = Cost Breakdown Structure; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; AC = Actual Cost
The first step of DC&W COSTC process is WCE and WCB review and appraisal.
Update estimated
Project Appraise
• WCE Operations and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
NO
Indentify WCB WCB variated
WPB review Go to next step
Variated parts parts identified?
YES
WELLS COST CONTROLLING
YES NO
Revised Project
Update WCE
WCB required?
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; CBS = Cost Breakdown Structure; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; AC = Actual Cost
Moving
Preliminary
WCE - Cumulative Cost
Phase ∅ 1
Drilling
Phase ∅ 2
Drilling
Phases
Logs
Phase ∅ 3 Run Casing
Cementing Well Testing
Well Head Completion
The above figure does not allow cost control of Completion operations, for which is required a
Time vs. Cost curve, as follows.
Time vs. Cost of Completion Works curve
Time
Activity3
Activity2
Completion
Activities
Activity1
The second step of DC&W COSTC process is Select CBS for Cost Control purpose.
Update estimated
Project Appraise
• AFE Operations and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
WELLS COST CONTROLLING
YES
Define
custom CBS
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; CBS = Cost Breakdown Structure; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; AC = Actual Cost
The definition of a custom CBS requires the analysis of the project’s requirements which might
drive the selection of a CBS different from that Company standard.
In such case, it is advisable that lower CBS elements are can be re-combined for proper
feeding of Company cost database.
The third step of DC&W COSTC is Assign WCE to CBS Cost Elements.
Update estimate
Project Appraise
• WCE Operations and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
Review WC E
Go to next step assignment
to CBS
WELLS COST CONTROLLING
NO
WC E = Wells Cost Estimate; CBS = Cost Breakdown Structure; WCB = Wells Cost Baseline; AC = Actual Cost
Following sub-para. describe the bottom-up and top-down techniques used to deploy cost
figures for all CBS cost elements.
Bottom-up technique applies when CBS and WCE have same breakdown.
Same breakdown means that exists an unambiguous correspondence between WCE and CBS
lower cost elements; i.e. to each WCE cost item corresponds a cost element at lower level of
CBS.
Cost Contol
CBS
WCE
Cost Data
for each
Cost
Element
Cost of upper CBS elements are calculated by adding the costs of all cost elements depending
from that cost element.
Cost Contol
CBS
Cost
A B C
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2
Top-down technique applies when WCE has lower breakdown than CBS.
“Lower breakdown” means that WCE data have lower breakdown degree with respect to CBS
breakdown.
Cost Contol
CBS
Bottom-up Top-down
WCE
WCE is assigned to corresponding CBS element and is further broken down according to
following techniques:
• Known %, developed from cost database relevant to previous similar projects
• Drilling engineers’ experience.
Cost Contol
CBS
Cost
A B C
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2
In most cases - as shown in the above figures - a mix of top-down and bottom-up techniques
should be applied.
In most cases the Actual Cost of a cost element requires input both from cost estimate of the
operation done and from Company Accounting System.
Collect Actual Cost Data Step Workflow
SCHEDULE &
COST PHYSICAL
OTHER PROCESSES
Update estimate
Project Appraise
• WCE Operations and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
YES
NO
Calculate
Actual Cost Calculate
Go to next step
for upper Actual Cost
Cost Elements
Use of accounted costs available from CAS for Actual Cost provides 100% of accuracy; these
data are available with some delay with respect to the costs sustained for the operations done
up to Depthnow / Timenow.
Therefore CAS cost data can be used only for completed operations of parts thereof.
When CAS cost data is unavailable, an estimate of the costs for the operations shall be done
following one, or a mix, of these techniques:
• Cost estimate based on project contracts
• Cost estimate based on DC&W Dept. cost database relevant to other projects
• Cost estimate based on CAS cost data for same or other projects.
Accuracy of estimated cost is < 100%; therefore when CAS cost data is available it has to
replace the previously estimated cost data.
Calculus of Actual Cost of operation of a cost element often requires input from both CAS and
Cost Estimating (also known as Accrued Cost).
The figure below provides a scheme of Actual Cost accuracy, CAS cost data and estimated
cost data. “Final Cost of Operation Performed” represents the 100% of accounted cost that is
unknown at Depthnow / Timenow during operation performance, but will be known at their
completion after all cost accounting process have been completed.
The fifth step of DC&W COSTC is Input Cost Data in Monitoring System and Compare AC with
WCE.
Update estimate
Project Appraise
• WCE Operations and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
Get Dephtnow /
Timenow Input
Calculate
Input AC in
Check and CV = WCE - AC
From previous step Cost Monitor Go to next Step
Approve AC for each CBS
Tool (Genesis)
cost element
WELLS COST CONTROLLING
Phase ∅ 1
Phase ∅ 2 AC
WCE
Drilling
Phases
Depthnow
CV = WCE@ - AC
Phase ∅ 3
Depth
Activity3
Timenow
CV = WCE@ - AC
Activity2
Completion
Activities
Activity1
CV value indicates operation (or phase, or activity or entire project, depending upon CBS cost
element under analysis) cost trend:
• Positive CV indicates AC lower than WCE, thus positive cost trend
• Negative CV indicates AC higher than WCE, thus negative cost trend
• CV 0 = indicates AC equal to WCE, thus acceptable cost trend.
SCHEDULE &
COST PHYSICAL
OTHER PROCESSES
Update estimate
Project Appraise
• WCE Operations and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
WELLS COST CONTROLLING
Calculate
CI = WCE / AC
From previous step Go to next step
for each CBS
cost element
The seventh step of DC&W COSTC is Estimate Cost At Finish (EAF) and Cost To Finish
(ETF).
Update estimate
Project Appraise
• WCE Operations and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
Apply various
Define ETF Range Calculate EAF
From previous step ETF Estimate Go to next step
or Value Range or Value
Techniques
WELLS COST CONTROLLING
ETF is the best possible estimate at Depthnow / Timenow of further expenditure necessary for
operations’ completion.
Constant WCE
This techniques assumes that WCE is correct thus the remaining costs to be expended are
those already estimated:
ETF = WCET - AC
It implies no variances occurred to Wells Cost Baseline, thus project cost performances are
equal to those planned.
Constant EAF
This technique assumes that EAF - estimated at the previous Depthnow/Timenow - can be
confirmed:
ETF = EAF - AC
It implies that no variances occurred with respect to the estimate developed at the previous
Depthnow/Timenow, thus the last estimate could be confirmed.
CI correction
This technique assumes that the remaining part of the operations will be executed with the
same cost index (CI) of the operations up to Depthnow/Timenow:
It implies that the operation efficiency (or inefficiency) with respect to WCE is assumed being
constant for the remaining part of the operations.
Project Team consideration on operations and WCB might drive them to the conclusion that
the remaining part of the operations might have a better or worse cost index than those up to
Depthnow/Timenow:
K is the correction factor: K< / >1 means that the remaining part of the operations are expected
to have a worse / better cost performance.
These various techniques support the definition of ETFmax and ETFmin, thus a range for ETF.
Phase ∅ 1
AC
Phase ∅ 2
WCE
ETF = EAF - AC
AC
Depthnow
WCE@
ETF = [WCET/(K• CI)] - AC
Phase ∅ 3
ETF = WCET - AC
ETF = (WCET /CI) - AC
WCET
EAF
Depth WCET/CI
WCET /K• CI
ETF = WCET - AC
ETF = EAF - AC
Activity2
Completion
Activities
Activity1
Based on calculated ETFmin and ETFmax, also for EAF can be identified EAFmin and EAFmax.
Phase ∅ 1
AC
Phase ∅ 2
WCE
AC
Depthnow
WCE@
Phase ∅ 3
WCET
EAFMIN EAFMAX
Depth RANGE OF FUTURE
COST TRENDS
EAFMAX
EAFMiN
Time
WCET
Activity3
AC
WCE@ Timenow
RANGE OF FUTURE
Activity2 COST TRENDS
Activity1
Control Limits are upper and lower limits for CI, as defined by PT.
In absence of any specific indication for CI upper and lower control limits, it can be assumed
equal to the Expected Accuracy Range +/- 15%.
Variances can be monitored for each CBS element, from lowest to the entire project.
Update estimate
Project Appraise
• WCE Operations and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
Go to Update WC E
YES
Evaluate CI within
CI entire project
or outside
From previous step within
Control Range for
Control Limits?
each cost element
WELLS COST CONTROLLING
NO
Go to Define and
Propose
Corrective Actions
CI = Cost Index
Variances Monitoring
CI
upper limit
lower limit
Depth / Time
CI - especially figures below lower limit - indicates those operations on which the PT has to
concentrate its effort.
Update WCE, requires an internal adjustment to WCE, without modifying the WCE of the
entire project.
Update estimate
Project Appraise
• WCE Operatios and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
WCE of each cost element is well approximated by the EAF of each cost element; otherwise -
for those operations identified critical from CI - the cost estimating technique applied for
Planning phase, should be applied, whenever WCB suffers considerable variances.
The tenth step of DC&W COSTC is Define and Propose Corrective Actions.
SCHEDULE &
COST PHYSICAL
OTHER PROCESSES
Update estimate
Project Appraise
• WCE Operations and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
Go to Update WC E
and Cost
Performance
Reporting
NO
Identify
Select Revised WCB
From previous step possible
Corrective Actions Required?
Corrective Actions
WELLS COST CONTROLLING
YES
Go to Revised
WCB/WCE
Development
and Approval
Corrective Actions, is a broad term to indicate: drilling program modification, rig type
modification, wells drilling sequence, WCE substantial revisions (modification to WCE of the
entire project, etc.)
The eleventh step of DC&W COSTC is Revised WCB/WCE Development and Approval.
Update estimate
Project Appraise
• WCE Operations and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
Go to
Cost Reporting
Develop Detailed YES
Submit Proposal Approval
From previous step Proposall
for Approval obtained?
for WCB/WCE
Go to Assign WCE
WELLS COST CONTROLLING
to CBS
NO Cost Elements
Go to
Go to Update WC E
Cost Reporting
Update estimate
Project Appraise
• WCE Operations and Update Project
Schedule and Depth / Time
• WCB Related Resources Schedule
Resources Progress
At Finish
Actual Cost gathered during DC&W COSTC process provides input to feed and update DC&W
Dept. Cost Database.
These Cost Data are further processed and used during DC&W CEA process.
Nevertheless also during DC&W COSTC process, an activity, a group of activities, or the
project might require to be re-cost estimated; such re-estimate is performed using both Cost
Data from the same project or - if the contracts issued for the project do not provide cost data
for the activities under CEA - from DC&W Dept. Cost Database.
Input Output
• Cost Data for CEA
• Cost Data DC&W Dept. during Pre-feasibility,
from all COST Feasibility and
Projects Program
DATABASE • Cost Data to Update
/ Revise CEA during
Execution
Use of standard CBS simplifies costs inputting and comparison and makes use of Cost Data
more reliable for DC&W CEA and COSTC.
3. Executive Summary:
a. Cost Report closing date: date up to which the actual cost have
been accounted / estimated
b. Main Variations to:
i. Scope
ii. Time
iii. Resources
iv. Unit rates
v. Other
(brief description of the main variations which justify higher /
lower Cost Index)
c. Control Limits defined: control limits agreed, outside which
Corrective Actions become mandatory
d. Project’s Actual Cost: total AC for the operations done up to Cost
Report closing date (i.e. Depthnow for Drilling and Timenow for
Completion)
e. Project’s Cost Variance: CV relevant to the entire project
f. Project’s Estimate To Finish: total ETF required (Min. and Max.
values)
g. Project’s Estimate At Finish: total EAF estimated (Min. and Max.
values) and relevant trend
Closing dates
h. Project’s Cost Index: CI trend from Project’s start-up to Cost Report
closing date
CI
upper limit
lower limit
Closing Dates
5. Level of cost detail provided in Cost Report: with reference to CBS, detail
which cost elements are detailed in the following part of Cost Report
Phase
∅…
Phase
∅…
STAP-G-1-M-14483
IDENTIFICATION CODE
Phase
∅…
REVISION
47
SPEO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAG 38 OF 47
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division REVISION
STAP-G-1-M-14483 0
1. Depth Range From / To: the depth range of each drilling phase
2. Planned Time Duration @: the planned number of days to drill up to that depth from phase’s
beginning
3. Actual Time Duration @: the actual number of days to drill up to that depth from phase’s
beginning
4. Planned Time To Finish: the planned number of days to drill the balance phase
5. Actual Depth: the actual depth reached at the Closing Date
6. Actual % Phase: the progress - on depth basis - achieved; calculated as:
[(Actual Depth - Depth Phase start) / Depth Range (phase length)] x 100
for moving shall be calculated on a 0÷100 % basis: 100% shall be assigned at moving finish
7. WCET 1st Issue: the 1st issue of WCET (of the phase) and relevant issue date
8. WCET Current Issue: the last revision / update of WCET (of the phase) and relevant issue
date
9. WCE@ Current Issue: the last revision / update of WCE@ (of the phase) and relevant issue
date
10. AC: the Actual Cost of phase’s operation
11. CV: Cost Variance; calculated as:
WCE@ - AC
12. CI: Cost Index; calculated as:
WCE@ / AC
13. Estimated Cost x Depth Meter: the average cost x depth meter deducted from WCET;
calculated as:
WCET (of the phase) / Depth Range (phase length)
14. Actual Cost x Depth Meter: the average cost x depth meter deducted from AC; calculated as:
AC / (Actual Depth - Depth Phase start)
15. Cost x Depth Meter Index: the ratio between the Estimated Cost x Depth Meter and the Actual
Cost x Depth Meter; calculated as:
(Estimated Cost x Depth Meter) / (Actual Cost x Depth Meter)
16. Estimated Cost x Day: the average cost x day deducted from WCET; calculated as:
WCET / Phase’s Planned Time Duration (Days)
17. Actual Cost x Day: the average daily cost; calculated as:
AC / Actual Time Duration @
18. Actual Cost x Day Index: the ratio between the Estimated Cost x Day and the Actual Cost x
Day; calculated as:
(Estimated Cost x Day) / (Actual Cost x Day)
19. ETF: cost estimate to finish; calculated with the various techniques indicated in this handbook
20. EAF: cost estimate at finish; calculated with the various techniques indicated in this handbook
21. Notes: notes as required
Well… / Drilling
Cost Desc rip. Well Planned Actual Planned Actual Actual % WCET WCET WCE@ AC CV CI Esti m. Actual Cost x Esti m. Actual Actual ETF EAF Notes
Code Total Time Time Time To De pth Drilling 1 st Curren t Curren t Cost x Cost x Depth Cost x Cost x Cost x
Depth Dura t. Dura t. Finish De pth Issue Issue Issue Depth De pth Mete r Day Day Day
(19) (20)
Dat e Mete r Meter Index Index
@ @ Date Date
M M M M
i a i a
n x n x (21)
(6) (9)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (7) (8) (10) (11) (12) (16) (17)
(13) (14) (15) (18)
Drilling
STAP-G-1-M-14483
IDENTIFICATION CODE
REVISION
47
SPEO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAG 40 OF 47
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division REVISION
STAP-G-1-M-14483 0
Activity
…
Activity
…
Activity
…
STAP-G-1-M-14483
IDENTIFICATION CODE
Activity
…
REVISION
47
SPEO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAG 42 OF 47
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division REVISION
STAP-G-1-M-14483 0
1. Planned Time Duration @: the planned number of days to execute the completion activity
from its beginning
2. Actual Time Duration @: the actual number of days to execute the completion activity up to
the Closing Date
3. Planned Time To Finish: the planned number of days to finish the operations of the activity
4. Actual % Activity: the progress - on time basis - achieved; calculated as:
[(Actual Time Duration) / Completion Activity Planned Time Duration (Days))] x
100
5. WCET 1st Issue: the 1st issue of WCET (of the activity) and relevant issue date
6. WCET Current Issue: the last revision / update of WCET (of the activity) and relevant issue
date
7. WCE@ Current Issue: the last revision / update of WCE@ (of the activity) and relevant issue
date
8. AC: the Actual Cost of completion activity
9. CV: Cost Variance; calculated as:
WCE@ - AC
10. CI: Cost Index; calculated as:
WCE@ / AC
11. Estimated Cost x Day: the average cost x day deducted from WCET; calculated as:
WCET (of the activity) / Completion Activity Planned Time Duration
(Days)
12. Actual Cost x Day: the average daily cost; calculated as:
AC / Actual Time Duration @
13. Actual Cost x Day Index: the ratio between the Estimated Cost x Day and the Actual Cost x
Day; calculated as:
(Estimated Cost x Day) / (Actual Cost x Day)
14. ETF: cost estimate to finish; calculated with the various techniques indicated in this handbook
15. EAF: cost estimate at finish; calculated with the various techniques indicated in this handbook
16. Notes: notes as required
Well… / Completion
Cost Desc rip. Planned Actual Planned Actual WCET WCET WCE@ AC CV CI Esti m. Actual Actual ET F EAF No tes
Cod e Tim e Tim e Tim e T o % 1 st Curren t Curren t Cost x Cost x Cost x
Dura t. Finish Com pl Issue Issue Issue
Dura t. Day Day Day
@ etion (14) (15)
@ Dat e Dat e Dat e Index
M M M M
(1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (7) (11) i a i a
(8) (9) (10) (12) (13) n n x (16)
(4) x
Comple
STAP-G-1-M-14483
tion
IDENTIFICATION CODE
REVISION
47
SPEO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAG 44 OF 47
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division REVISION
STAP-G-1-M-14483 0
1. Planned Time Duration @: the planned number of days to execute the completion activities
2. Actual Time Duration @: the actual number of days to execute the completion activities up to
the Closing Date
3. Planned Time To Finish: the planned number of days to finish the completion activities
4. Actual % Activity: the progress - on time basis - achieved; calculated as:
[(Actual Time Duration) / Completion Activities Planned Time Duration (Days))] x
100
5. WCET 1st Issue: the 1st issue of WCET and relevant issue date
6. WCET Current Issue: the last revision / update of WCET and relevant issue date
7. WCE@ Current Issue: the last revision / update of WCE@ and relevant issue date
8. AC: the Actual Cost of completion activities calculated as sum of actual cost of all completion
activities up to the closing date
9. CV: Cost Variance; calculated as:
WCE@ - AC
10. CI: Cost Index; calculated as:
WCE@ / AC
11. Estimated Cost x Day: the average cost x day deducted from WCET; calculated as:
WCET / Completion Activity Planned Time Duration (Days)
12. Actual Cost x Day: the average daily cost; calculated as:
AC / Actual Time Duration @
13. Actual Cost x Day Index: the ratio between the Estimated Cost x Day and the Actual Cost x
Day; calculated as:
(Estimated Cost x Day) / (Actual Cost x Day)
14. ETF: cost estimate to finish; calculated as sum of ETF of all completion activities
15. EAF: cost estimate at finish; calculated as sum of ETF of all completion activities
16. Notes: notes as required
Well…
Cost Desc rip. Well Planned Actual Planned Actual Actual % Actual WCET WCET WCE@ AC CV CI Esti m. Actual Cost x Esti m. Actual Actual ETF EAF Notes
Code Total Time Time Time To Depth Drilling % 1st Curren t Curren t Cost x Cost x Depth Cost x Cost x Cost x
Durat. Finish Depth Issue Issue Issue Depth Depth Meter Day Day Day
Depth Durat. Compl (20) (21)
Date Meter Meter Index Index
@ @ etion Date Date
M M M M
i a i a
n x n x (22)
(6) (10)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (7) (8) (9) (11) (12) (13) (17) (18)
(14) (15) (16) (19)
STAP-G-1-M-14483
IDENTIFICATION CODE
REVISION
47
SPEO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAG 46 OF 47
Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division REVISION
STAP-G-1-M-14483 0
Attachments
1. Explanatory Notes
2. Significant document: i.e. supporting Variances Analysis, especially those
justifying CI outside control limits
SECTION 7
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2. REFERENCES .............................................................................. 8
4.1 MOB-DEMOB............................................................................. 14
4.3.1 RIG................................................................................. 17
4.3.1.2 COMPLETION.................................................................. 27
4.3.2.3 COMPLETION.................................................................. 42
6. TANGIBLE ................................................................................ 53
7. INTANGIBLE............................................................................. 64
9. INSURANCES.......................................................................... 168
1.1 OBJECTIVE
This section has been developed to assist DC&W Dept. in performing Wells Cost
Estimating and Control, with the aim of providing a standard and unambiguous
guidance to allocate costs under the proper correct cost code.
Such allocation is of a paramount importance in order to properly monitor and
control the project, and to feed cost database with consistent and comparable data
from the various projects, to make available data subsequently for cost estimating.
Thus this section is written for DC&W Dept. while using specific software tools (i.e.
Genesys) and not for Company ERP (i.e. SAP).
1.2 SCOPE
This section defines all cost items (i.e. activities, materials and equipment costs)
relevant to a certain cost code.
Cost codes are used by:
• Project for allocating cost estimates, and for monitoring and controlling
Project’s performances;
• Company to control project costs for administrative and financial purposes.
This section covers only cost codes used for Projects cost estimate and control; this
section indicates the direct correspondence between (Project) Cost Code and
Company Cost Code of Accounts and provides the required clarified clarifications
whenever required. The format is given below.
(Project) Cost Code might have - in few cases and only for contracts issued - more
than one corresponding Company Cost Code of Account; the convention used is:
• XXXXXX: used Company Cost Code of Account for the entire contract;
• YYYYYY: ERP codes applicable to each contractual work item.
Reference is made to Company Charts of Accounts Release 2004; modification to
Company Charts of Accounts shall require the revision of the correspendece
between (Project) Cost Code and Company Cost Code of Account.
1.3 APPLICABILITY
2. REFERENCES
3.1 General
Unless differently stated hereinafter Cost Code means Project’s Cost Code of
Account.
Following paragraphs:
• describe the cost belonging to each Cost Code and relevant explanations
and battery limits, whenever required;
• define the correspondence between Project Cost Code and Company Cost
Code of Account;
• are deployed according to the current Project Cost Breakdown Structure,
and specifically according to the following scheme:
Following pages show the Cost Breakdown Structures used for DC&W project
CAPEX, OPEX and DECAB cost estimating and control.
CBS defined in this section is a proposed template, and has been developed to
satisfy projects’ needs and objectives, including their cost estimating and
controlling.
It is of paramount importance that cost data are comparable among various
projects; thus specific project needs (such as local fiscal regulations, JV, etc.)
driving to defining and using a different CBS, require in any case to account cost
according to Company CBS (in this case two CBS are required: Company CBS to
feed cost database, and project CBS to estimate and control the project).
Each well is characterised by a life cycle: in particular life cycle cost is subdivided in
three main phases: Capex, Opex and Decab.
Thus when a well requires decompletion, relevant costs are sustained to modify the
asset and shall be accounted for as DECAB of the existing well; costs sustained to
drill / modify the existing well after said decompletion shall be accounted for as
CAPEX of the new well (although it includes some assets of the previous existing
well).
Project CAPEX
(Heavy) CBS
Drilli ng Completion Completion
Workove r
Preli mi nary
Re-e ntry
Well Well Well
Testing Testing Testing
Dri lli ng
Secure Secure Secure
Well Well Well
Well
Testing
Well Worki ng
Tangibl e Intangible
A bandoni ng Unit
Secure CB S CB S CB S
Well
Repeated under each
descending root
Rig
Tangibl e Intangible
Contractor
CB S CB S CB S
Project OPEX
Moving Moving
Preliminary Preliminary
Co mpletion Completion
Well Well
Testing Testing
Secure Secure
Well Well
Rig
Tangible Intangible Working
Tangible Intangible
Contractor Unit
CB S CB S CB S CB S CB S CB S
Project DECAB
Moving Moving
Preliminary Preliminary
Well Well
Abandoning Abandoning
Rig Working
Tangible Intangible
Tangible Intangible Unit
Contractor
CB S CB S CB S
CB S CB S CB S
4. TIME PHASES
Time Phases refer to the logic sequence of DC&W operations, and CBS upper
part reflects such sequence. Time is the main cost driver of DC&W projects.
Project CAPEX
(Heavy) CBS
Drilli ng Complet ion Complet ion
Workove r
Prelimi nary
Re-e nt ry
Well Well Well
Test ing Test ing Testing
Dri lli ng
Secure Secure Secure
Well Well Well
Well
Testing
Well
A bandoning
Secure
Well
4.1 MOB-DEMOB
Project CAPEX
MOB-DEMOB
Specific Rules:
• …
Well Site
(Civil Works)
Specific Rules:
• Cost Code differ from those indicated under para 8, in the following
manner:………………………………………………………
• This cost code is alternative to Well Site for each Well (cost code
…………….); decision at project commencement shall be taken
whether to use Wells Site or Well Site (Well Site is recommended in
order to better assign cost to each well)
4.3 Well
Specific Rules:
• …
• …
• …
Project CAPEX
4.3.1 Rig
Well… i
Rig
(Heavy)
Dri lli ng Co mplet ion
W orkove r
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.1.1 Drilling
Rig
Dri lli ng
Movi ng Phase ∅ i
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.1.1.1 Moving
Dri lli ng
Movi ng
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.1.1.2 Phase ∅
Phase ∅ i
Preli mi nary
Re-e ntry
Dri lli ng
Well
Testing
Well
A bandoni ng
Secure
Well
Specific Rules:
• Phases ∅ are identified according to “Hole size”
4.3.1.1.2.1 Preliminary
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.1.1.2.2 Re-entry
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.1.1.2.3 Drilling
Specific Rules:
• …
Specific Rules:
• …
∇ START: start run in hole D.P., wire line, coiled tubing for positioning the
first plug (cement, bridge, etc.)
∇ FINISH: end of operations on well
Specific Rules:
• …
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.1.2 Completion
Rig
Completion
Movi ng
Preli mi nary
Completion
Well
Test ing
Secure
Well
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.1.2.1 Moving
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.1.2.2 Preliminary
Specific Rules:
• Only for completion operations executed after some hold time, with rig
re-positioning.
4.3.1.2.3 Completion
Specific Rules:
• …
Specific Rules:
• …
Specific Rules:
• …
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.1.3.1 Moving
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.1.3.2 Preliminary
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.1.3.3 Completion
Specific Rules:
• …
Specific Rules:
• …
Specific Rules:
• …
Rigle ss
Completion
Movi ng
Preli mi nary
Completion
Well
Testing
Secure
Well
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.2.1 Moving
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.2.2 3Preliminary
Specific Rules:
• …
4.3.2.3 Completion
Specific Rules:
• …
Specific Rules:
• …
Specific Rules:
• …
5. RIG CONTRACTOR
Rig Contractor
Rig Reimbursable
Other Drilling
Mobilization Equipment Rig Rate
Costs
Demobilization Services
Specific Rules:
Specific Rules:
• Equipment supplied by Rig Contractor
Specific Rules:
• …
Other Drilling
Costs
Additional
Rig Occasional
Equipment
Moving Services
Services
Specific Rules:
• Cost to be assigned to the Well to be drilled
Specific Rules:
…
…
…
Specific Rules:
• Cost of additional equipment supplied by Rig Contractor
Specific Rules:
• Costs from Rig-up end to Rig-down start
• Contract to be analysed if stand-by costs are foreseeen for reasons
imputable to Rig Contractor
• Contractual tariffs for various activities might be different for various
activities (i.e. during drilling maximum tariff, during log stand-by
tariff, during running in-hole of a completion string, etc.):
nevertheless all these shall be included within this Cost Code
6. TANGIBLE
Tangible
Well Head
Mechanical
Casing & Tubing Christmas Tree
Materia ls
and Equipment
Tangible CBS
General Rule:
Tangible materials even if purchased / included under different contract (i.e. included in contractor’s
scope), shall be included under these Cost Codes, unless differently indicated
Casing &
Tubing
6.1.1 Tubing
Specific Rules:
…
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
…
6.1.4 Casing
Specific Rules:
…
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Tangible
Wells Head
Christmas Tree
and Equipment
Specific Rules:
…
…
Mechanical
Materials
Specific Rules:
…
…
7. INTANGIBLE
Intangible
Technical
Company
Consulting Re ntals & Hire Other Services
Services
Services
Intangible CBS
General rule:
Intangible materials even if purchased by Company under different contract
(i.e. not included in contractor’s scope), shall be included under these Cost
Codes.
Intangible
Consumable
Materia ls
Other Oil
Bit Fuel Lubricants Products for
Bunkering
7.1.1 Bit
Specific Rules:
…
…
7.1.2 Fuel
Specific Rules:
…
…
7.1.3 Lubricants
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Intangible
Other Supplies
Specific Rules:
…
…
Intangible
Wells Seismic
Tests
Specific Rules:
…
…
Intangible
Transports and
Re lated Burdens
Transport and
Land Marine Air Pipeline
Shipping
Transports Transports Transports Transports
Services
Specific Rules:
…
…
Transpo rts
and Re lated
Burdens
Cars and
Land Tra nsports Special Vehicles
Re ntals
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Transports
and Re lated
Burdens
Marine
Transports
Marine Vessels
Transports Re ntals
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Transports
and Related
Burdens
Air
Transports
Air Helicopters
Transports Rentals
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
• Cost imputable to Wells CAPEX up to production tests included, and
then to OPEX
Specific Rules:
…
…
Transports
and Re lated
Burdens
Transports &
Shipping
Services
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Intangible
Travels &
Missions
Specific Rules:
…
…
Intangible
Specialised S. = Services
Contractors
Driving
Geological Pumping &
Conductor Mud S. Deviation S. Electrical Logs
Assistance Cementing S.
Pipe S.
Non Destructive
Production Gravel Other Other Drilling & Waste
Tests on Purc hased
Tests S. Packing S. Specialised S. Production S. Treatment S.
Materials
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specialised
Contractors
Mud Se rvices
Company Contractor
Materia ls and Materia ls and
Additives Additives
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
• (1) Only for Mud Centrifugal Sepator Service
Specific Rules:
• (1) Only for ………………..
• ..
• (3) for Completion Fluids Materials
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
• (1) Only for Mud Materials and Additives purchased by Contractor
Specific Rules:
• SDD included in this code
• LWD included in this code when used only for formation evaluation
Specialised
Contractors
Deviation
Services
Deviation Deviation
Technical Equipment
Assistance Re ntals
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specialised
Contractors
Pumping and
Cementing
Services
Cementing
Cement Cement
Technical
Additives Materials
Service
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
• (1) link with 3rd level of purchase is included under 621050
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specialised
Contractors
Stim ulation
Services
Stimulation
Stim ulation
Services and
Materia ls
Equipment
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
• (1) Only for materials included in Contractor scope
• (2) Only for materials purchased by Company, excluded materials for
sand control
Specialised
Contractors
Production
Tests
Services
Specific Rules:
• (1) Included Wire Line Tools 611153
Specific Rules:
• (1) Included Wire Line Tools 611153
Specific Rules:
Specialised
Contractors
Gravel Packing
Services
Gravel Packing
Gravel Packing
Services and
Materia ls
Equipment
Specific Rules:
Specific Rules:
• (1) Materials and Additives purchased by Company, excluded
materials for acid stimulation
• (2) Materials and Additives purchased by Contractor
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specialised
Contractors
Other
Specialised
Services
Specific Rules:
• (1) Excluding Coring services, Sour Gas Monitoring and Safety
Equipment, Other Services Not Included Under Other Cost Codes
Specific Rules:
• (1) Excluding Pick-up and Lay-down Machine Services, Sour Gas
Monitoring and Safety Equipment, Other Services Not Included
Under Other Cost Codes
Specific Rules:
• (1) Excluding Pick-up and Lay-down Machine Services, Coring
Services, Other Services Not Included Under Other Cost Codes
Specific Rules:
• (1) Excluding Pick-up and Lay-down Machine Services, Coring
Services, Sour Gas Monitoring and Safety Equipment
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specialised
Contractors
Other Drilling /
Production
Services
Integrated
E.I. Packers and
Liner Hange rs Completion
Casing Packers Safety Valves
Services
Specific Rules:
• (1) Excluding Packers and Safety Valves, Liner Hangers, Integrated
Completion Services, Related Materials purchased by Company
…
Specific Rules:
• (1) Excluding E.I. Casing Packers, Liner Hangers, Integrated
Completion Services, Related Materials purchased by Company
…
Specific Rules:
• (1) Excluding E.I. Casing Packers, Packers and Safety Valves,
Integrated Completion Services, Related Materials purchased by
Company
…
Specific Rules:
• (1) Excluding E.I. Casing Packers, Packers and Safety Valves,
Integrated Completion Services, Related Materials purchased by
Company
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Intangible
Specialised
Contractor
Contractor
Loss Tools
Reimbursement
Specific Rules:
…
…
Intangible
Environmental
Services
Security and
Gua rdianship
Services
Specific Rules:
…
…
Intangible
Custom Levies
Miscellaneous
Purchases and
Taxes
Sales taxes
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Intangible
Telecom munication
Services
Other
Telecommunication
Telecom munication
Services
Services
Specific Rules:
…
…
…
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Intangible
Technical
Consulting
Services
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Intangible
Rentals
& Hire
Downhole Surface
Tools Equipment
Rentals Rentals
Specific Rules:
• (1) Contract for Surface Equipment Rentals contracts might contain
also Downhole Tools: these shall be included under this cost code
…
Specific Rules:
• Cost of personnel require to operate these equipment shall be included
under this cost code
• (1) Downhole Tools rentals contracts might contain also Surface
EQIPMENT rentals: these shall be included under this cost code
Intangible
Company
Services
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Intangible
Other
Services
Drawings, Photographs,
Other
Various
Services
Re productions
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Well Site
(Civil Works)
8.1 Excavation
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
• When Civil Works or their parts are not clearly attributable to
Facilities or Wells (i.e. common use, etc.) the cost are shared
between Wells project and Facilities project as “pro quota” of Wells /
Facilities budget vs. total project budget.
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
…
…
Specific Rules:
• Recovery value - if any - shall be a project income
• When Rented or Leased Buildings are not clearly attributable to
Facilities or Wells (i.e. common use, etc.) the cost are shared
between Wells project and Facilities project as “pro quota” of Wells /
Facilities budget vs. total project budget.
9. INSURANCES
All Insurances costs imputable to the Project are accounted under this code.
Project CAPEX
Insurances
9.1 Insurances
Specific Rules:
…
…