TEAM MEMBER EVALUATION FORM†

The following evaluation of your team members is a tool to help improve your experience with
group work. Its purpose is to determine those who have been active and cooperative members as
well as to identify those who did not participate. Be consistent when evaluating each group
member’s performance by using the guidelines below.

2 – never 4 – rarely 6 – sometimes 8 – usually 10 – always

Name of student being evaluated:

Vincent

Circle your responses.

Questions
Has the student attended team meetings? (10 points) 2 4 6 8 10
Has the student made a serious effort at assigned work before the team 2 4 6 8 10
meetings? (10 points)
Has the student responded the email about group project well? (10 points) 2 4 6 8 10
Has the student made a serious effort to write final report on his or her 2 4 6 8 10
assigned part? (10 points)
Has the student made a serious effort to fulfill his/her team role 2 4 6 8 10
responsibilities on assignments? (10 points)
Has the student notified a teammate if he/she would not be able to attend a 2 4 6 8 10
meeting or fulfill a responsibility? (10 points)
Does the student listen to his/her teammates’ ideas and opinions 2 4 6 8 10
respectfully and give them careful consideration? (10 points)
Does the student attempt to make contributions in group meetings? (10 2 4 6 8 10
points)

(20 points) Based on your responses to these questions, assign an overall rating on the following
scale: Very Good (Insert one of the given words.)

Excellent Consistently carried more than his/her fair share of the workload
Very good (-2) Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and
cooperative
Satisfactory (-4) Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and
cooperative
Ordinary (-6) Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative
Marginal (-8) Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
Deficient (-10) Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
Unsatisfactory (-12) Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
Superficial (-14) Practically no participation
No show (-16) No participation at all
____________________________________________
†Adapted from a form reprinted in B. J. Millis and P. G. Cottell, Jr., Cooperative Learning in Higher
Education Faculty, Oryx, Phoenix, 1998.
TEAM MEMBER EVALUATION FORM†
The following evaluation of your team members is a tool to help improve your experience with
group work. Its purpose is to determine those who have been active and cooperative members as
well as to identify those who did not participate. Be consistent when evaluating each group
member’s performance by using the guidelines below.

2 – never 4 – rarely 6 – sometimes 8 – usually 10 – always

Name of student being evaluated:

Lucas

Circle your responses.

Questions
Has the student attended team meetings? (10 points) 2 4 6 8 10
Has the student made a serious effort at assigned work before the team 2 4 6 8 10
meetings? (10 points)
Has the student responded the email about group project well? (10 points) 2 4 6 8 10
Has the student made a serious effort to write final report on his or her 2 4 6 8 10
assigned part? (10 points)
Has the student made a serious effort to fulfill his/her team role 2 4 6 8 10
responsibilities on assignments? (10 points)
Has the student notified a teammate if he/she would not be able to attend a 2 4 6 8 10
meeting or fulfill a responsibility? (10 points)
Does the student listen to his/her teammates’ ideas and opinions 2 4 6 8 10
respectfully and give them careful consideration? (10 points)
Does the student attempt to make contributions in group meetings? (10 2 4 6 8 10
points)

(20 points) Based on your responses to these questions, assign an overall rating on the following
scale: Ordinary (Insert one of the given words.)

Excellent Consistently carried more than his/her fair share of the workload
Very good (-2) Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and
cooperative
Satisfactory (-4) Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and
cooperative
Ordinary (-6) Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative
Marginal (-8) Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
Deficient (-10) Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
Unsatisfactory (-12) Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
Superficial (-14) Practically no participation
No show (-16) No participation at all
____________________________________________
†Adapted from a form reprinted in B. J. Millis and P. G. Cottell, Jr., Cooperative Learning in Higher
Education Faculty, Oryx, Phoenix, 1998.
TEAM MEMBER EVALUATION FORM†
The following evaluation of your team members is a tool to help improve your experience with
group work. Its purpose is to determine those who have been active and cooperative members as
well as to identify those who did not participate. Be consistent when evaluating each group
member’s performance by using the guidelines below.

2 – never 4 – rarely 6 – sometimes 8 – usually 10 – always

Name of student being evaluated:

Jake

Circle your responses.

Questions
Has the student attended team meetings? (10 points) 2 4 6 8 10
Has the student made a serious effort at assigned work before the team 2 4 6 8 10
meetings? (10 points)
Has the student responded the email about group project well? (10 points) 2 4 6 8 10
Has the student made a serious effort to write final report on his or her 2 4 6 8 10
assigned part? (10 points)
Has the student made a serious effort to fulfill his/her team role 2 4 6 8 10
responsibilities on assignments? (10 points)
Has the student notified a teammate if he/she would not be able to attend a 2 4 6 8 10
meeting or fulfill a responsibility? (10 points)
Does the student listen to his/her teammates’ ideas and opinions 2 4 6 8 10
respectfully and give them careful consideration? (10 points)
Does the student attempt to make contributions in group meetings? (10 2 4 6 8 10
points)

(20 points) Based on your responses to these questions, assign an overall rating on the following
scale: Satisfactory (Insert one of the given words.)

Excellent Consistently carried more than his/her fair share of the workload
Very good (-2) Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and
cooperative
Satisfactory (-4) Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and
cooperative
Ordinary (-6) Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative
Marginal (-8) Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
Deficient (-10) Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
Unsatisfactory (-12) Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
Superficial (-14) Practically no participation
No show (-16) No participation at all
____________________________________________
†Adapted from a form reprinted in B. J. Millis and P. G. Cottell, Jr., Cooperative Learning in Higher
Education Faculty, Oryx, Phoenix, 1998.
TEAM MEMBER EVALUATION FORM†
The following evaluation of your team members is a tool to help improve your experience with
group work. Its purpose is to determine those who have been active and cooperative members as
well as to identify those who did not participate. Be consistent when evaluating each group
member’s performance by using the guidelines below.

2 – never 4 – rarely 6 – sometimes 8 – usually 10 – always

Name of student being evaluated:

Circle your responses.

Questions
Has the student attended team meetings? (10 points) 2 4 6 8 10
Has the student made a serious effort at assigned work before the team 2 4 6 8 10
meetings? (10 points)
Has the student responded the email about group project well? (10 points) 2 4 6 8 10
Has the student made a serious effort to write final report on his or her 2 4 6 8 10
assigned part? (10 points)
Has the student made a serious effort to fulfill his/her team role 2 4 6 8 10
responsibilities on assignments? (10 points)
Has the student notified a teammate if he/she would not be able to attend a 2 4 6 8 10
meeting or fulfill a responsibility? (10 points)
Does the student listen to his/her teammates’ ideas and opinions 2 4 6 8 10
respectfully and give them careful consideration? (10 points)
Does the student attempt to make contributions in group meetings? (10 2 4 6 8 10
points)

(20 points) Based on your responses to these questions, assign an overall rating on the following
scale: _______________(Insert one of the given words.)

Excellent Consistently carried more than his/her fair share of the workload
Very good (-2) Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and
cooperative
Satisfactory (-4) Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and
cooperative
Ordinary (-6) Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative
Marginal (-8) Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
Deficient (-10) Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
Unsatisfactory (-12) Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
Superficial (-14) Practically no participation
No show (-16) No participation at all
____________________________________________
†Adapted from a form reprinted in B. J. Millis and P. G. Cottell, Jr., Cooperative Learning in Higher
Education Faculty, Oryx, Phoenix, 1998.