Software Verification

PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE

REVISION NO.: 0

AS 3600-2018 RC-PN EXAMPLE 001

Slab Punching Shear Design

PROBLEM DESCRIPTION
The purpose of this example is to verify slab punching shear design in ETABS and
SAFE.

The numerical example is a flat slab that has three 8-m spans in each direction, as
shown in Figure 1.

0.3 m A B C D 0.3 m
8m 8m 8m
0.6 m

4
0.25 m thick flat slab

8m

3
Columns are 0.3 m x 0.9 m
with long side parallel
8m to the Y-axis, typical

2 Concrete Properties
Unit weight = 24 kN/m3
f'c = 30 N/mm2
8m
Y Loading
DL = Self weight + 1.0 kN/m 2
X LL = 4.0 kN/m2
1
0.6 m

Figure 1: Flat Slab for Numerical Example

The slab overhangs beyond the face of the column by 0.15 m along each side of the
structure. The columns are typically 0.3 m x 0.9 m, with the long side parallel to
the Y-axis. The slab is typically 0.25-m thick. Thick shell properties are used for
the slab.

AS 3600-2018 RC-PN EXAMPLE 001 - 1

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 0

The concrete has a unit weight of 24 kN/m3 and a f 'c of 30 N/mm2. The dead load
consists of the self weight of the structure plus an additional 1 kN/m2. The live
load is 4 kN/m2.

TECHNICAL FEATURES TESTED

 Calculation of punching shear capacity, shear stress, and D/C ratio.

RESULTS COMPARISON
Table 1 shows the comparison of the punching shear capacity, shear stress ratio,
and D/C ratio obtained with the punching shear capacity, shear stress ratio and D/C
ratio obtained by the analytical method. They match exactly for this problem.

Table 1 Comparison of Design Results for Punching

Shear at Grid Point B-2

Shear Stress Shear Capacity D/C ratio

Method (N/mm2) (N/mm2)

ETABS, SAFE 1.81 1.16 1.56

Calculated 1.81 1.16 1.67

COMPUTER FILE: AS 3600-2018 RC-PN EX001

CONCLUSION
The results show an exact comparison with the independent results.

AS 3600-2018 RC-PN EXAMPLE 001 - 2

 Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 0

HAND CALCULATION
Hand Calculation For Interior Column
dom = [(250 − 26) + (250 − 38)] / 2 = 218 mm
Refer to Figure 2.
U = 518+ 1118 + 1118 + 518 = 3272 mm
ax = 518 mm
ay = 1118 mm

518 Note: All dimensions in millimeters

Y
Critical section for
109 150 150 109 punching shear shown
dashed.
A B
Column Side 2
109

450
Side 1

Side 3

X
1118

Center of column is 450

point (x1, y1). Set
this equal to (0,0).
109
Side 4
D
C

Figure 2: Interior Column, Grid B-2 in Model

From the output at grid line B-2:

V* = 1131.2256 kN
Mv2 = −50.2988 kN-m
Mv3 = 44.9419 kN-m

AS 3600-2018 RC-PN EXAMPLE 001 - 3

Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 0

The maximum design shear stress is computed along the major and minor axis of column
separately:
V*  uM v 
vmax
= 1.0 + * 
ud om  8V ad om 

1126.498 • 103  3272 • 50.2988 • 106 

vmax, X
= • 1 + 3 
3272 • 218  8 • 1126.498 • 10 • 1118 • 218 

vmax, X = 1.579 • 1.0749 = 1.70 N/mm2

1126.498 • 103  3272 • 44.9419 • 106 

vmax,Y
= • 1 + 3 
3272 • 218  8 • 1126.498 • 10 • 518 • 218 

vmax,Y = 1.579 • 1.1445 = 1.81 N/mm2 (Govern)

The largest absolute value of vmax= 1.81 N/mm2

The shear capacity is calculated based on the smallest of AS 3600-18 equation 11-35,
with the dom and u terms removed to convert force to stress.
  2 
0.17  1 + ϕ f ′c
ϕ fcv = min   βh  = 1.086N/mm2 in accordance with AS 9.2.3(a)

0.34ϕ f ′c
AS 9.2.3(a) yields the smallest value of ϕ fcv = 1.16 N/mm2, and thus this is the shear
capacity.
vU 1.81
Shear Ratio
= = = 1.67
ϕ f cv 1.16

AS 3600-2018 RC-PN EXAMPLE 001 - 4