Final Report1

STRUCTURAL
ANALYSIS REPORT
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF SEISMIC RESISTANT

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
Owner: – Prepared By: –

Mr. Shiva Kafle Er. Amir Kushma
Date: May 7, 2021

Structural Analysis and Design of Residential Building
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1
Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1
Scope of the Work ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Seismic Design Philosophy......................................................................................................................... 2
Seismic Design of Building ........................................................................................................................ 2
Salient Features ........................................................................................................................................... 2
Project Information ................................................................................................................................. 2
Building Features .................................................................................................................................... 2
Site Condition ......................................................................................................................................... 2
Structural System ........................................................................................................................................ 3
Assumptions................................................................................................................................................ 3
Methodology ................................................................................................................................................... 3
Load Case and Combinations ..................................................................................................................... 4
Load Case................................................................................................................................................ 4
Load Combinations ................................................................................................................................. 5
Relevant Code Followed ............................................................................................................................. 5
Modeling of Building.................................................................................................................................. 5
Structural Design ........................................................................................................................................ 5
Beam Design ........................................................................................................................................... 5
Column Design ....................................................................................................................................... 6
Slab Design ............................................................................................................................................. 6
Foundation Design .................................................................................................................................. 6
Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................... 6
Calculations and Output Details ..................................................................................................................... 8
Load Calculation ....................................................................................................................................... 12
Static Analysis (Seismic Coefficient Method) .......................................................................................... 13
Fundamental Natural Time Period ........................................................................................................ 13
Design Horizonal Acceleration Spectrum ............................................................................................. 13
Load Assigned .......................................................................................................................................... 14
Analysis Results ........................................................................................................................................ 16
Center of Mass and Center of Rigidity ................................................................................................. 19
Modal Results ....................................................................................................................................... 19
Story Result........................................................................................................................................... 20
Summary Description ................................................................................................................................... 20
Input Data...................................................................................................................................................... 20
Plot ................................................................................................................................................................ 21
Tabulated Plot Coordinates ........................................................................................................................... 21
i
Tabulated Plot Coordinates ........................................................................................................................... 22

Design And Result ........................................................................................................................................ 29
References ..................................................................................................................................................... 34
ii
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
This report summarizes the structural analysis and design of the residential building belonging to Mr. Shiva
Kafle. It has been gone through the provided architectural drawing so as the basic structural system is worked
out as accordingly. The scope of the work is to perform structural analysis and design of this building and to
generate municipal structural drawing. The effort has been made to analyze and generate design sheets and
drawings.
The basic aim of the structural design is to build a structure, which is safe, fulfilling the intended purpose
during its estimated life span (80 years), economical in terms of initial and maintenance cost, durable and
also maintaining a good aesthetic appearance. A building is considered to be structurally sound, if the
individual elements and the building as a whole satisfy the criteria for strength, stability and serviceability
and in seismic areas additional criteria for ductility and energy absorption capabilities. The overall building
must be strong enough to transfer all loads through the structure to the ground without collapsing or losing
structural integrity by rupture of the material at the critical sections, by transformation of the whole or parts
into mechanisms or by instability. This strength criterion is valid for all loads that will normally be applied
to the building during its lifetime. The concern is needed for the structure to have structural integrity. For
load transfer mechanism, loads applied in the buildings are transferred from slab to beam, beam to column
and from column to safely to foundation. In high-risk seismic areas, structures should be ductile and capable
of dissipating energy through inelastic actions.
Earthquakes occur due to the vibration of the earth’s surface caused by waves originating from a source of
disturbance inside the earth mass. The cause of vibration may be volcanic eruption, tectonic activity,
landslides, rock falls or even manmade explosions. Although, they last for few seconds only, they may be
the most destructive ones.
During an earthquake, ground motion occurs in a random fashion in all directions. These ground motions
cause structures to vibrate and induce inertial forces on them. Thus, structure located in such locations need
to be suitably designed and detailed so as to counteract these forces. During the shaking event, the level of
damage should be such that it can be economically repaired. The main philosophy of seismic design is,
therefore, to obtain a no collapse structure rather than no damage structure.
Thus, the philosophy of seismic design can be summarized as follows:
1. Resist minor earthquakes without damage.
2. Resist moderate earthquake with minor structural and some non-structural damage.
3. Resist major catastrophic earthquakes without collapse.
The structures are generally designed for much lower seismic forces than what it may actually experience
during its life time. Since the structure is expected to undergo damage in the event of a severe shaking,
reliance is placed on the inelastic response of the structure beyond yield.
Therefore, structures have to be ductile and capable of dissipating energy through inelastic actions. Ductility
can be achieved by avoiding brittle modes of failures. Brittle modes of failures include, shear and bond
failure. Thus, structures should be designed on Weak Beam-Strong Column philosophy.
SCOPE OF THE WORK

The proper scope of work can be summarized as follows:
• Structural analysis and design of Residential Building

• Structural Drafting and detailing of structural members
1
SEISMIC DESIGN PHILOSOPHY

The seismic design philosophy has various implications listed below
a. The structures are designed for much lower seismic force than what it may actually sustain during
its lifetime corresponding to the maximum shaking intensity experienced or forecast at the site.
Therefore, philosophically the seismic design is very different from designs for other effects such as
gravity loads on the structure to ever exceed the design gravity loads.
b. The level of earthquake protection to a structure must account for consequences of damage for
instance.
i. After a major earthquake, the essential services (e.g. electricity, hospitals, and buildings) are
needed for post-earthquake management and relief. Hence, such facilities need higher level
of earthquake protection than is provided to ordinary buildings.
ii. Facilities such as dams and nuclear power plants, if damaged in an earthquake, can cause
catastrophe. Hence, these facilities need maximum level of protection.
SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDING

In order to achieve the above philosophy, seismic design of building attempts to building in the following
four attributes in them.
a. A minimum strength
b. Reasonable stiffness
c. Good ductility and
d. Simple and regular configuration
SALIENT FEATURES
PROJECT INFORMATION
Client : Mr. Shiva Kafle
Plinth Area : 985.64 sq.ft.
BUILDING FEATURES
Type of Structure : RCC Framed Structure
Storey : Four Storey and stair cover
Storey Height : 3.048 m
Total Height : 16.9164 m
SITE CONDITION
Soil Type : II
Seismic Zone Factor : 0.36
Net Safe Bearing Capacity : 120 KN/m2
Figure 1 - Ground Floor Plan

2
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
With due consideration of functional, architectural and economical aspects, a Ductile Moment Resisting
Reinforced Concrete Frame has been considered as an appropriate structural system for this building. The
structural system consists plinth beam, main beams and columns. The external wall consists of 230 mm thick
chimney made brick masonry wall. Internal wall consists of 110 mm thick chimney made brick. The brick
walls are considered as non-load. The foundation system consists of Isolated and Strap with mat foundation.
The floor system consists of 125 mm thick solid slabs with beam section of 300x450 mm and column of
350x350 mm.
ASSUMPTIONS
The structural design of any structures can be entirely dependent upon the individual designer. For our case,
following assumptions has been made while performing the structural analysis and design:
− Centre line dimensions are followed for analysis and design.

− For analysis purpose, the beams are assumed to be rectangular so as to distribute slightly larger
moment in columns. In practice, a beam that fulfills requirement of flanged section in design,
behaves in between a rectangular and a flanged section for moment distribution.
− For stiffening compression member, effective length factor has been taken as 1.5. This shall be
checked in final calculation.
− Floor diaphragm are considered in every level for the rigid floor action.
− The main beams rest centrally on columns to avoid local eccentricity.
− For lateral load, since wind load is not so significant in the region where the site is located but in
contrary very risky in terms of seismic conditions, seismic loads are dominant. And herein,
equivalent lateral loads are taken into consideration using seismic coefficient method.
− As the soil test report is not available, the ground condition of the site is assumed
METHODOLOGY
Preliminary dimensioning of structural members has been done on the basis of provided architectural
drawings. A finite element method (FEM) based software, Structural Analysis Program ETABS 2018 is used
for a 3D modeling and analysis. For the analysis of building, beams and columns are modeled with two
nodded frame elements whereas slabs are modeled with three to four nodded thin shell area elements
provided in the software.
3
Figure 2 - 3D Extrude View of the building
The modeling is accompanied with different loadings like dead, live, earthquake, with the several load
combinations from code and the final analysis output is extracted in Microsoft excel workbook and the
design was carried out from the ETABS 2018 design at the critical sections of structural elements. Lateral
load analysis is done with the help of seismic coefficient method for the earthquake load.
LOAD CASE AND COMBINATIONS

LOAD CASE
The following loads were assumed to occur in Structural System.
a. Dead Load
b. Live Load
c. Seismic Load
Dead Load
Dead loads are as per IS 875: 1987 Part I
As the software, we have used, generates the self-weight of the Structural member by itself, we have not
calculated the self-weight.
Live Load
Live loads are as per IS 875: 1987 Part II
Seismic Load
For Earthquake Load, 100% of Dead Load and
i. 25% of Live Load for load < 3 KN/m2 and
ii. 50% of Live Load for load > 3 KN/m2 are taken in account.
Seismic Coefficient method & Response spectrum method using Indian Code: IS 1893-2016 are applied for
Earthquake Analysis of the Structure and the Parameters taken are:
Importance Factor, I = 1
Zone factor, Z = 0.36 (Zone V)
4
Soil Type = II
Response Reduction Factor = 5 (For Ductile Shear Wall with SMRF, SMRF)
Damping = 0.05
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Set No. Load Combination
1 1.5(DL+LL)
2 1.2(DL+LL±ELx± 0.3ELy)
3 1.5(DL±ELx± 0.3ELy)
4 0.9DL ± 1.5(ELx±0.3 Ely)
5 1.2(DL+LL±ELy± 0.3ELx)
6 1.5(DL±ELy± 0.3ELx)
7 0.9DL ± 1.5(ELy±0.3 Elx)
where: DL = Dead load

LL = Live load
EL = Earthquake load
Modal analysis is carried out using FEM Based Three-dimensional analysis.
RELEVANT CODE FOLLOWED

a. IS 456-2000: For Design of Structural Elements
b. SP 16: For Design Aid
c. SP 34: For Detailing
d. IS 1893-2016: Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures
e. NBC 1994: National Building Code of Nepal
f. IS 13920-1993: For Ductile Detailing of Structural Elements
MODELING OF BUILDING
The building has been modeled in ETABS 2018. The modeling of the structural geometry begins with the
generation of joints, each with a unique identification number. The sequence of generation of joints and that
of members is an important process as this will help organizing the work better and will be helpful in
automation of the work. We want in earthquake construction the beam column joints to be rigid and do not
fail. So, taking this into account while modeling the structure; the joints can be assigned a rigid end factor
between 0 and 1. In the given problem, the moment resisting joints have been considered to have full rigidity
i.e. rigid end factor is taken to be 1. Next, the model is completed by connection the joints with frame
members i.e. beams and columns. All the columns and primary beams have been modeled. The modeling of
the infill has also been excluded because the code renders the masonry infill as non-structural components.
Although, their weight, acting as line load on the beams, has been taken in account.
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
BEAM DESIGN
Design of beam requires determination of cross-sectional dimension and reinforcement details to satisfy both
serviceability and strength requirement. The serviceability requirement for deflection is controlled by
effective span to effective depth ratio. Generally, depth of the beam is governed by the strength requirement.
Here, beams are designed with the software ETABS considering the reversible effect due to the seismic
5
force. The most critical value of seismic force of all possible direction as been considered. The grade of
concrete and steel are M20 and Fe500.
The shear stirrups are designed as per the requirement and instruction of the code and area of the stirrups are
checked for provided spacing. The spacing of the stirrups is governed by the seismic detailing requirements.
For area of the steel see ETABS frame reinforcement diagram for beam.
COLUMN DESIGN
Columns are structural elements used primarily to support compressive loads. They are usually square or
rectangular, circular or L-shaped or octagonal in cross section. It is reinforced with longitudinal and
transverse steel. Columns are also designed with the help of ETABS. Each Column was designed for the
total vertical load coming on to the individual column. The percentage of steel is checked as per limit
governed by IS456. The ties area is checked for the spacing provided. The grade of the concrete and steel
are M20 and Fe500.
The spacing of the ties is as per the requirement of seismic criteria given in seismic code and seismic detailing
code. Also, the lapping and any other detailing requirement of IS13920 is followed. Column design summary
is shown in the table.
SLAB DESIGN
Slabs are the most widely used structural elements forming floor and roof of buildings for supporting loads
normal to its surface. They may be supported on a wall or on a beam or directly on the columns. The beam
supporting the slabs are considered stiff with deflection relatively very small as compared to that of slab.
The slabs are designed as two-way slab by bending moment coefficient method for different existing
boundary conditions as per the code IS456-2000. The boundary conditions considered are as follows:
1. Interior Panels
2. One Short Edge Discontinuous
3. One long Edge Discontinuous
4. Two Adjacent Edge Discontinuous
5. Two Short Edge Discontinuous
6. Two Long Edge Discontinuous
7. Three Edges Discontinuous (One Long Edge Continuous)
8. Three Edges Discontinuous (One Short Edge Continuous)
The straight bars are used at bottom without any bent up. And the extra cut pieces are used for extra top bar.
The grade of concrete and steel are M20 Fe500.
FOUNDATION DESIGN
All structures supported on earth consists of super structure and substructure. The foundation can be defined
as substructure, which interfaces the structure and the supporting ground. Its purpose is to transfer all the
loads from superstructure to the ground safely and provide stable base to the superstructure. There are
different types of footing suitable for different structural behavior. In our case Isolated and strap with raft
footing is suitable on designing. The design sheet is included in the report below.
CONCLUSION
The Seismic design of the residential building is done as per the relevant IS code and NBC code. The dead
and live load of the building is taken as per IS875 Part I and Part II. The seismic load is as per the IS1893-
2016 by seismic coefficient method and the seismic coefficient is assigned to the analysis and design
software ETABS.
The analysis of the 3D model after assigning all the loads in ETABS. And also, the design of each member
of column and beam as well as foundation is done from the ETABS using IS code. The other detailing rules
6
for column, beam, foundation and the beam column junction concerning the stirrups size, spacing, lap length,
confining of joints are done as per the IS13920 for ductile design. After design of all the members, the
structural drawing is drawn as per design and other detailing rules for earthquake resistant building. In
conjunction with conceptual design; the structure is designed for safety and economy. The designers will not
be responsible if any alteration in structural as well as non-structural elements which may change the
structural behavior of the building made by client, supervisor or the contractor without the prior written
permission from the designer. The structure is safe up to the designed storey.
NOTE: The site supervision & quality test of the different construction materials of the proposed building
do not undertaken by the designer. Hence any failure or error occurred with the building due to the non-
implementation of the recommendation made in this report and structural drawings or due to improper
construction will not be the responsibility of the designer. The soil bearing capacity used in the design of the
foundation is an assumption on the basis of experience. However, it is recommended to confirm the bearing
capacity of soil is equal or greater than assumed in this report before construction. Also, the structural
analysis has been completed on the assumptions that the proposed building shall be constructed under the
proper supervision of skilled technical person.
7
CALCULATIONS AND OUTPUT DETAILS
8
9
10
11
LOAD CALCULATION
Material Brick Masonry
3
Unit Weight 18.85 KN/m
Wall Type 1: 9" Wall Without Opening Wall Type 2: 9" Wall With Opening
Wall Thickness 0.23 m Wall Thickness 0.23 m
Percentage of Opening 0% Percentage of Opening 20%
Floor Height 3.048 m Floor Height 3.048 m
Beam Depth 0.35 m Beam Depth 0.35 m
Wall Height 2.698 m Wall Height 2.698 m
UDL from Brick Masonry Wall 11.70 KN/m UDL from Brick Masonry Wall 9.36 KN/m
Total Wall Load = 11.70 KN/m Total Wall Load = 9.36 KN/m
Take Finish Load = 11.7 KN/m Take Finish Load = 9.4 KN/m
Wall Type 3: 9" Wall With Opening Wall Type 4: 4.5" Wall Without Opening
Wall Type 5: 4.5" Wall With Opening Wall Type 6: 4.5" Wall With Opening
Wall Type 7: 4.5" Wall With Opening

Wall Thickness 0.125 m
Percentage of Opening 0%
Floor Height 0.9 m
Beam Depth 0m
Wall Height 0.9 m
UDL from Brick Masonry Wall 2.12 KN/m
Total Wall Load = 2.12 KN/m
Take Finish Load = 2.2 KN/m
Live Load Dead Load
Room and Kitchen = 2 KN/m
2
Floor Finishes = 1.2 KN/m2
2
Stair, Passage = 3 KN/m
2
Corridors, Balcony = 3 KN/m
2
Toilet and Bathroom = 2 KN/m
2
Accessible Roof = 1.5 KN/m
2
Inaccessible Roof = 0.75 KN/m
12
STATIC ANALYSIS (SEISMIC COEFFICIENT METHOD)

FUNDAMENTAL NATURAL TIME PERIOD
Height of the Building = 15.240 m

Natural Time Period, T = 0.075 x H0.75 For RCC Building (IS:1893-2002)
= 0.578 sec
DESIGN HORIZONAL ACCELERATION SPECTRUM

𝑆𝑎 𝑧 𝐼
Ah = . .
𝑔 2 𝑅
Where,
Ah = Horizontal Acceleration Coefficient
Sa/g = Average Response Acceleration Coefficient
Z = Zone Factor
I = Importance Factor
R = Response Reduction Factor
Here,
I= 1
Z= 0.36
R= 5
Sa/g = 2.5
⸫ Ah = 0.09
Now, Seismic Weight, W = 4950.003 KN
⸫ Design Seismic Base Shear,VB = 445.5002 KN
13
LOAD ASSIGNED
14
15
ANALYSIS RESULTS
Auto Seismic Loading
TABLE: Auto Seismic - IS 1893:2002
Period Weight Base
Ecc Site Coeff
Name Top Story Bottom Story User T Z I R Used Used Shear
Ratio Type Used
sec kN kN
EQx 0.05 FifthFloor Plinth Level 0.578 0.36 II 1 5
EQx(1/3) 0.05 FifthFloor Plinth Level 0.578 0.36 II 1 5 0.578 0.0847 4950.0027 419.294
EQy 0.05 FifthFloor Plinth Level 0.578 0.36 II 1 5
EQy(1/3) 0.05 FifthFloor Plinth Level 0.578 0.36 II 1 5 0.578 0.0847 4950.0027 419.294
IS 1893:2016 Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQx
according to IS 1893:2016, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity
Direction = Multiple
Eccentricity Ratio = 5% for all diaphragms
Structural Period
Period Calculation Method = User Specified

User Period T = 0.578 sec
Factors and Coefficients
Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 3] Z = 0.36

Response Reduction Factor, R [IS Table
R=5
9]
Importance Factor, I [IS Table 8] I=1
Site Type [IS Table 1] = II
Seismic Response
Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, Sa /g Sa Sa

= 2.5 = 2.5
[IS 6.4.2] g g
Equivalent Lateral Forces
S
ZI ga
Seismic Coefficient, Ah [IS 6.4.2]
Ah =
2R
Calculated Base Shear
Period
W Vb
Direction Used
(kN) (kN)
(sec)
X 0.578 4950.0027 419.2943
X + Ecc. Y 0.578 4950.0027 419.2943
X - Ecc. Y 0.578 4950.0027 419.2943
16
Applied Story Forces
Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

m kN kN
FifthFloor 16.9164 44.6524 0
ForthFloor 13.8684 164.3033 0
ThirdFloor 10.8204 127.6904 0
SecondFl
7.7724 63.9386 0
oor
FirstFloor 4.7244 18.7096 0
Plinth
1.6764 0 0
Level
Base 0 0 0
IS 1893:2016 Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQy
according to IS 1893:2016, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity
Direction = Multiple
Eccentricity Ratio = 5% for all diaphragms
Structural Period
Period Calculation Method = User Specified

User Period T = 0.578 sec
Factors and Coefficients
17
Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 3] Z = 0.36

Response Reduction Factor, R [IS Table
R=5
9]
Importance Factor, I [IS Table 8] I=1
Site Type [IS Table 1] = II
Seismic Response
Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, Sa /g Sa Sa

= 2.5 = 2.5
[IS 6.4.2] g g
Equivalent Lateral Forces
S
ZI ga
Seismic Coefficient, Ah [IS 6.4.2]
Ah =
2R
Calculated Base Shear
Period
W Vb
Direction Used
(kN) (kN)
(sec)
Y 0.578 4950.0027 419.2943
Y + Ecc. X 0.578 4950.0027 419.2943
Y - Ecc. X 0.578 4950.0027 419.2943
Applied Story Forces
18
Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

m kN kN
FifthFloor 16.9164 0 44.6524
ForthFloor 13.8684 0 164.3033
ThirdFloor 10.8204 0 127.6904
SecondFl
7.7724 0 63.9386
oor
FirstFloor 4.7244 0 18.7096
Plinth
1.6764 0 0
Level
Base 0 0 0
CENTER OF MASS AND CENTER OF RIGIDITY

TABLE: Centers of Mass and Rigidity
Mass X Mass Y XCM YCM Cum. X Cum. Y XCCM YCCM XCR YCR
Story Diaphragm
kg kg m m kg kg m m m m
FirstFloor D1 101742.91 101742.91 4.60 6.57 101742.91 101742.91 4.60 6.57 5.37 4.78
SecondFloor D2 86577.21 86577.21 4.44 7.28 86577.21 86577.21 4.44 7.28 4.77 5.42
ThirdFloor D3 78906.23 78906.23 4.02 7.90 78906.23 78906.23 4.02 7.90 4.42 5.95
ForthFloor D4 50894.72 50894.72 3.6255 6.919 50894.72 50894.72 3.6255 6.9187 4.2485 6.239
FifthFloor D5 9814.62 9814.62 2.21 4.43 9814.62 9814.62 2.21 4.43 2.83 4.99
MODAL RESULTS
TABLE: Modal Participating Mass Ratios
Period
Case Mode UX UY UZ Sum UX Sum UY Sum UZ
sec
Modal 1 0.724 0.6471 0.019 0 0.647 0.019 0
Modal 2 0.571 0.0443 0.675 0 0.691 0.693 0
Modal 3 0.482 0.1024 0.046 0 0.794 0.739 0
Modal 4 0.241 0.0716 0.001 0 0.865 0.740 0
Modal 5 0.217 8.20E-03 0.096 0 0.874 0.835 0
Modal 6 0.203 0.0105 0.025 0 0.884 0.861 0
Modal 7 0.146 0.0134 0.003 0 0.898 0.864 0
Modal 8 0.14 4.50E-03 0.023 0 0.902 0.887 0
Modal 9 0.131 0 0.006 0 0.902 0.893 0
Modal 10 0.114 5.20E-03 2.40E-03 0 0.9072 0.8951 0
Modal 11 0.113 1.74E-05 1.24E-02 0 0.9072 0.9076 0
Modal 12 0.102 5.00E-04 1.70E-05 0 0.9077 0.9076 0
Period
Case Mode RX RY RZ Sum RX Sum RY Sum RZ
sec
Modal 1 0.724 0.0067 0.145 0.171 0.007 0.145 0.171
Modal 2 0.571 0.2489 0.017 0.028 0.256 0.161 0.199
Modal 3 0.482 0.0114 0.051 0.526 0.267 0.212 0.725
Modal 4 0.241 1.14E-02 0.444 0.005 0.278 0.656 0.730
Modal 5 0.217 0.3541 0.028 0.013 0.633 0.684 0.743
Modal 6 0.203 0.0508 0.032 0.106 0.683 0.716 0.849
Modal 7 0.146 0.0038 0.017 0.000 0.687 0.733 0.849
Modal 8 0.14 0.0285 5.40E-03 1.40E-03 0.7156 0.7383 0.8504
Modal 9 0.131 7.10E-03 0.0001 0.0253 0.7227 0.7384 0.8757
Modal 10 0.114 4.10E-03 0.0141 0.0023 0.7268 0.7525 0.878
Modal 11 0.113 0.0268 9.93E-06 8.00E-04 0.7535 0.7525 0.8788
Modal 12 0.102 1.83E-05 0.0007 0.0107 0.7536 0.7531 0.8895
19
STORY RESULT
TABLE: Story Drifts
Output Step Shear X Drift X Stiff X Shear Y Drift Y Stiff Y
Story Case Type
Case Number kN mm kN/m kN mm kN/m
FifthFloor EQx LinStatic 1 X 0.000756 11 4.4196 3.1496 16.9164
FifthFloor EQx LinStatic 1 Y 0.000265 12 4.4196 5.715 16.9164
FifthFloor EQy LinStatic 1 X 0.000231 12 4.4196 5.715 16.9164
FifthFloor EQy LinStatic 1 Y 0.000814 9 0 5.715 16.9164
ForthFloor EQx LinStatic 1 X 0.000854 23 1.3716 14.1986 13.8684
ForthFloor EQx LinStatic 1 Y 0.000251 9 0 5.715 13.8684
ForthFloor EQy LinStatic 1 X 0.000311 23 1.3716 14.1986 13.8684
ForthFloor EQy LinStatic 1 Y 0.000857 9 0 5.715 13.8684
ThirdFloor EQx LinStatic 1 X 0.001423 23 1.3716 14.1986 10.8204
ThirdFloor EQx LinStatic 1 Y 0.000433 9 0 5.715 10.8204
ThirdFloor EQy LinStatic 1 X 0.000452 23 1.3716 14.1986 10.8204
ThirdFloor EQy LinStatic 1 Y 0.001219 9 0 5.715 10.8204
SecondFloor EQx LinStatic 1 X 0.0018 23 1.3716 14.1986 7.7724
SecondFloor EQx LinStatic 1 Y 0.000573 9 0 5.715 7.7724
SecondFloor EQy LinStatic 1 X 0.00064 23 1.3716 14.1986 7.7724
SecondFloor EQy LinStatic 1 Y 0.001267 9 0 5.715 7.7724
FirstFloor EQx LinStatic 1 X 0.002077 2 0 12.827 4.7244
FirstFloor EQx LinStatic 1 Y 0.000765 2 0 12.827 4.7244
FirstFloor EQy LinStatic 1 X 9.84E-04 2 0 12.827 4.7244
FirstFloor EQy LinStatic 1 Y 1.21E-03 9 0 5.715 4.7244
Plinth Level EQx LinStatic 1 X 1.12E-03 4 4.4196 12.827 1.6764
Plinth Level EQx LinStatic 1 Y 0.000469 8 0 3.1496 1.6764
Plinth Level EQy LinStatic 1 X 0.000548 4 4.4196 12.827 1.6764
Plinth Level EQy LinStatic 1 Y 0.00056 7 0 0 1.6764
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case or load combination.
INPUT DATA
Name StoryResp1
Display Type Max story displ Story Range All Stories
Load Case EQx Top Story FifthFloor
Output Type Max Bottom Story Base
20
PLOT
TABULATED PLOT COORDINATES

Story Response Values
Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir

m mm mm
FifthFloor 16.9164 Top 18.105 9.144
ForthFloor 13.8684 Top 23.634 8.226
ThirdFloor 10.8204 Top 20.741 7.305
SecondFloor 7.7724 Top 15.784 5.659
FirstFloor 4.7244 Top 9.607 3.562
Plinth Level 1.6764 Top 2.048 0.882
INPUT DATA
Name StoryResp1
Display Type Max story displ Story Range All Stories
21
Load Case EQy Top Story FifthFloor

Output Type Max Bottom Story Base
PLOT
TABULATED PLOT COORDINATES

Story Response Values
Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir

m mm mm
FifthFloor 16.9164 Top 5.538 17.876
ForthFloor 13.8684 Top 9.476 15.256
ThirdFloor 10.8204 Top 8.342 12.544
SecondFloor 7.7724 Top 6.736 8.707
FirstFloor 4.7244 Top 4.575 4.736
Plinth Level 1.6764 Top 0.969 0.967
Base 0 Top 0 0
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
DESIGN AND RESULT

Column Design
ETABS Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 + IS 13920:2016 Column Section Design
Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
SecondFloor C12 55 COL14X14 DCon13 0 3048 0.661
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
350 350 56 30
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
654.6648 62.6185 116.224 13.0933 13.0933 3216 2.63
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.660794 2598 17.3655 0 13.0933
Minor Bend(M2) 0.615082 2598 25.0474 0 13.0933
Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 71.0709 112.2923 41.1595 71.0709 387.95
Minor, Vu3 53.8187 112.2923 41.1595 53.8187 387.95
Joint Shear Check/Design
30
Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear

Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
(1.4) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A
Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
1225 32.2 2308.5127 464.716 654.6648 0.89698
Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.852 350 4.905 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.852 350 4.566 12 No 0
Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed
31
Beam Design
ETABS Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 + IS 13920:2016 Beam Section Design
Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
FirstFloor B6 20 MB-12X18 DCon12 175 4419.6 1
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
300 450 300 0 25 25
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15
Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-123.3552 2.1483 96.6298 0.0492
Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt

Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-123.3552 3.1592 0 -126.5144
Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu

Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -126.5144 762 0 762 274
Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 381 0 0 381
Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu
32
Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s

kN kN kN kN mm²/m
122.1764 0 133.6338 70.5197 871.32
Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2

Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
2.1483 96.6298 270 420 307.51
33
Slab Design
Material Properties
Grade of Steel (fy) = 500 N/mm2
Grade of Concrete (fck) = 20 N/mm2
Basic Dimension of the Slab

Length of Longer Span, Ly = 4.267 m
Length of Shorter Span, Lx = 3.962 m
The ratio of Ly and Lx, (Ly/Lx) = 1.077 <2 (⸫ Designed as Two-Way Slab)
Type of Slab Panel

Two Adjacent Edges Discontinuous
Design of the Slab

Provided overall depth of slab, D = 125 mm
Clear Cover (d') = 15 mm
Effective depth, d = 110 mm
Load Calculation
Dead Load of the Slab, DL = 3.125 KN/m2
Live Load on the Slab, LL = 2 KN/m2
Floor Finish on the Slab, FF = 1.1 KN/m2
Factored Total Load, Wu = 9.338 KN/m2
Bending Moment and Area of Steel Calculation
Dia. of
Moment Mu Mu/bd2 Pt Ast reqd Ast, min Spacing Ast, prov
Span bar (ϕ)
Coefficient
(KN-m) (N/mm2) (%) (mm2) (mm2) (mm) (mm) (mm2)
αx neg 0.052 7.566 0.625 0.15% 164.53 150 10 150 524
Short
αx pos 0.039 5.694 0.471 0.11% 122.49 150 10 150 524
αy neg 0.047 6.889 0.569 0.14% 149.21 150 10 150 524
Long
αy pos 0.035 5.130 0.424 0.10% 109.73 150 10 150 524
Check for deflection
The effective depth provided = 110 mm
Modification Factor = 2 (From fig. 4 IS 456:2000)
Required depth under deflection consideration = 86.13 mm

⸫ HENCE SAFE
34
Design of Isolated Footing (F1)
Design Data
2
Grade of concrete, fck = 20 N/mm
2
Grade of steel fy = 500 N/mm
2
Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil, q0 = 120 KN/m
Column Data
Larger Side of Column, Lc = 350 mm
Shorter Side of Column, Bc = 350 mm
Unfactored Axial Load, P = 388.174 KN
Clear Cover, d' = 50 mm
Design of Footing Pad

Size of Footing Pad
Self Weight % for footing = 10%
Total Load on footing = 426.9914 KN
2
Required area of footing pad = 3.558 m
Required length of footing = 1.886 m

Provided length of footing = 1.982 m
2
Provided area of footing pad = 3.929 m
2
Soil pressure at ultimate load, qu = 98.798 KN/m < S.B.C (OK)
⸫ The size of footing are Length = 1.982 m

Breadth = 1.982 m
Depth of Footing Pad

One Way Shear
Assume percentage of steel, pt (%) = 0.15%
From IS 456:2000,
2
Permissible shear strees, τc = 0.28 N/mm
Required depth of footing, dreqd = 212.829 mm
Provided depth of footing, dprov = 230 mm
Check for Bending

Limiting Moment, Mulim = 278.895148 KN-m
Critical section is at the face of the column. So, Moment at the critical section, M u = 65.19317 KN-m
⸫ Depth provided is sufficient.
Check for two-way shear
Perimeter of the punching section, p = 2320 mm

2
Area of the punching section = 533600 mm
35
2
Shear stress for two-way shear = 0.665 N/mm
2
Maximum Permitted shear stress = 1.118 N/mm
Calculation of Area of Steel
2
Area of steel required, Ast = 676.721 mm
Provided diameter of the rebar, ϕ = 12 mm

Spacing, S = 331.2429385 mm
2
Area of steel provided, Ast = 1494.393 mm OK
Hence, Provide 12 mm dia bar @ 150 mm C/C
230 mm
12 dia bar @ 150 mm C/C
1982 mm
350 mm
350 mm
1982 mm
36
Design Data
2
2
2
Column Data

Size of Footing Pad
2

2
2

Breadth = 2.286 m

One Way Shear
From IS 456:2000,
2
Check for Bending


2
37
2
2
2

Spacing, S = 259.1476434 mm
2
250 mm
2286 mm
350 mm
350 mm
2286 mm
38
Design Data
2
2
2
Column Data

Size of Footing Pad
2

2
2

Breadth = 1.829 m

One Way Shear
From IS 456:2000,
2
Check for Bending


2
39
2
2
2

Spacing, S = 359.5269314 mm
2
200 mm
1829 mm
350 mm
350 mm
1829 mm
40
Design Data
2
2
2
Column Data

Size of Footing Pad
2

2
2

Breadth = 1.524 m

One Way Shear
From IS 456:2000,
2
Check for Bending


2
41
2
2
2

Spacing, S = 888.9581703 mm
2
200 mm
1524 mm
350 mm
350 mm
1524 mm
42
DESIGN OF MAT FOUNDATION (/W STRAP BEAM)

The design of mat foundation (with strap beam) is done using SAFE 2016.
Here,
Grade of concrete (fck) = 20 N/mm2
Grade of rebar (fy) = 500 N/mm2
Soil bearing capacity = 120 kN/m2
Figure 3 - Soil bearing capacity Check
The result is under the permissible value. Hence, SAFE.

Reinforcement of slab (using SAFE 2016)
43
44
Beam Design
Figure 4 - Longitudinal Reinforcement

Figure 5 - Transverse Reinforcement
In Conclusion,
Size of Mat foundation = 22'6" x 49'4"
Depth of mat foundation = 12"
Top Reinforcement = 16mm ϕ @ 5" C/C in both directions
Bottom Reinforcement = 16mm ϕ @ 5" C/C in both directions
Strap beam details,
S.N. Name Section Size Rebar Details

1 SB1 1'-4" x 1'-10" Top Bar = 3-20ϕ
Bottom Bar = 3-20ϕ
Stirrups = 10ϕ @ 6" c/c
2 SB2 1'-0" x 1'-6" Top Bar = 2-20ϕ
Bottom Bar = 2-20ϕ
Stirrups = 10ϕ @ 6" c/c
45
REFERENCES
• IS 875 Part I; Design Loads (Dead Load based on Materials)
• IS 875 Part II; Design Load (Live/Imposed Load)
• IS 1893 Part I: 2016; Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures
• IS 456:2000; Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice
• NBC 105(Seismic Design of Building in Nepal)
• SP: 16-1980; Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS: 456-1978
• SP: 34-1987; Handbook on Concrete Reinforcement Detailing
• Pillai, S. U., Menon, D.; Reinforced Concrete Design, Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company Ltd,
New Delhi, 1998.
• Sinha, S. N.; Reinforced Concrete Design, Second Edition, Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company
Ltd, New Delhi, 1996
• Varghese, P. C.; Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete, Prentice Hall of India Private Ltd, New
Delhi, 1999.
• Jain, A. K.; Reinforced Concrete, Limit State Design, Fifth Edition, Nem Chand and Bros, Roorkee,
1999
• Rosenblueth, E. (Ed.); Design of Earthquake Resistant Structures, Pentech Press, London, 1980.
• Stratta, J.L.; Manual of Seismic Design, Pearson Education, 1987.
• Jain, S. K., Murthy, C. V. R.; A Short Course on Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete bBuildings,
Lecture Notes, Kathmandu, December 1997.
• CEB; Seismic Design of Concrete Structures, Comite Euro-Internaional du Beton (CEB), Gower
Technical Press Ltd., England, 1987.
• Varyani, U. H.; Structural Design of Multi – Storied Buildings, Second Edition, South Asian
Publishers Private Ltd., New Delhi, 2002.
46

Final Report1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Report1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STRUCTURAL

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF SEISMIC RESISTANT

Owner: – Prepared By: –

Date: May 7, 2021

Tabulated Plot Coordinates ........................................................................................................................... 22

SCOPE OF THE WORK

• Structural analysis and design of Residential Building

SEISMIC DESIGN PHILOSOPHY

SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDING

Figure 1 - Ground Floor Plan

− Centre line dimensions are followed for analysis and design.

Figure 2 - 3D Extrude View of the building

LOAD CASE AND COMBINATIONS

Set No. Load Combination

where: DL = Dead load

RELEVANT CODE FOLLOWED

CALCULATIONS AND OUTPUT DETAILS

Wall Type 7: 4.5" Wall With Opening

STATIC ANALYSIS (SEISMIC COEFFICIENT METHOD)

Height of the Building = 15.240 m

DESIGN HORIZONAL ACCELERATION SPECTRUM

Now, Seismic Weight, W = 4950.003 KN

⸫ Design Seismic Base Shear,VB = 445.5002 KN

IS 1893:2016 Auto Seismic Load Calculation

Period Calculation Method = User Specified

Factors and Coefficients

Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 3] Z = 0.36

Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, Sa /g Sa Sa

Equivalent Lateral Forces

Applied Story Forces

Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

IS 1893:2016 Auto Seismic Load Calculation

Period Calculation Method = User Specified

Factors and Coefficients

Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 3] Z = 0.36

Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, Sa /g Sa Sa

Equivalent Lateral Forces

Applied Story Forces

Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

CENTER OF MASS AND CENTER OF RIGIDITY

TABULATED PLOT COORDINATES

Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir

Load Case EQy Top Story FifthFloor

TABULATED PLOT COORDINATES

Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir

DESIGN AND RESULT

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Design Code Parameters

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear

(1.4) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Design Code Parameters

Factored Forces and Moments

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2