Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
In the past few years, chemical admixtures such as water reducers have done great contributions to
improve the application performance of concrete. Among these admixtures, polycarboxylate
superplasticizer which exhibits an excellent ability of water–reducing, prevention of slump loss and
easily modifying by changing the combined monomers, have been proven to be the most perspective
and the trend of water-reducers for concrete in the future [1,2].
Conventionally, the polycarboxylate superplasticizer is a kind of comb-like macromolecule
superficial agent, which obtains by unsaturated monomer through the radical graft copolymerization
reaction. In order to obtain polycarboxylate superplasticizer with high properties, the synthetic
method was studied which based on molecular design theory of polymer [3,4].
In this article, the structure of superplasticizer was characterized by FT-IR and GPC. Furthermore,
the effects of the product on fluidity of cement paste and water reduction for concrete were
investigated.
Experiments
Materials. Vinylmethylpolyethylene glycol (VPEG), produced in Liaoyang City, Liaoning Province,
CH2=CH(CH3)CH2CH2O(CH2CH2O)m(CH2CH3CHO)nH; Acrylic Acid (AA), produced in Korea;
Vitamin C (Vc), Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2), Sodium Formaldehyde Sulfoxylate (SFS), Ammonium
Persulfate (APS) and other synthetic materials are purchased from China Chemical Reagent; Ordinary
Portland cement, P.O 42.5R, produce in Longyan City, Fujian Province; Sand, produced in
Zhangzhou City, Fujian Province; Stone, produced in Xiamen City, Fujian Province.
Synthesis methods. A certain amount of macromonomer,unsaturated monomer and water are
charged in a glass bottom-rounded reactor equipped with mechanical stirrer, thermometer and reflux
condenser. The system is purged with nitrogen and heated at a temperature. After the addition of
initiator and chain transfer agent in 3 hours, the system is further kept at a temperature for one hour
and then neutralized with 30% NaOH. An light-coloured polymer solution are obtained.
All rights reserved. No part of contents of this paper may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of Trans
Tech Publications, www.ttp.net. (ID: 128.210.126.199, Purdue University Libraries, West Lafayette, USA-13/07/15,11:08:40)
3882 Progress in Industrial and Civil Engineering
FT-IR and GPC analysis. The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra in the
range of 4000-400 cm-1 were obtained with the KBr plates by using Nicolet Avator 360. Gel
permeation chromatography (GPC) measurements were performed at 30℃ with ultrapure water as the
eluant (1.0 ml/min) using an Waters 1515 HPLC System.
Performance testing method. Test flow of cement mortar for workability according to
GB8077/T-2000<Methods for testing uniformity of concrete>. Test concrete slump and its loss
according to GB8076-2008<Concrete admixture>.
260 Vc
)
m
m SFS
(
y 220 APS
t
i
d
i
u 180
l
f
e
t 140
s
a
P
100
0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2
Initiator(%)
Figure 1 The effect of paste fluidity to the polycarboxylate superplasticizer from different initiator
dosage
Upon previous work, the temperature of Vc/H2O2, SFS/H2O2 and APS initiator system was
respectively chose at 55℃, 60℃ and 90℃. When the dosage of Vc was 0.75% and the mole ratio of
Vc and H2O2 is 1:4, the paste fluidity reached the highest. The paste fluidity decreased amide
increasing of the Vc dosage. The disperse performance of polycarboxylate superplasticizer which
prepared by SFS/H2O2 and APS initiator system behaved worse than the one prepared by Vc/H2O2
initiator system. So the optimized initiator system was Vc-H2O2 and the best dosage was 0.75%. To
find out its cause, the main reason might be the reactive activity of Vc-H2O2 initiator system matches
to the macromonomer,unsaturated monomer. So it was more likely to format copolymer which had
been certified to excellent performance, but not homopolymer.
Influences of polymerized concentration on the performance
The variation in paste fluidity was similar and much smaller when the polymerized concentration
altered from 30% to 50%. While disperse performance decreased obviously when the polymerized
concentration exceed 60%, especially 70%. The experimental data was shown in Fig.2.
Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 204-208 3883
300
) 0h
mm
(y 250 1h
t
id
iu 200
lf
et 150
sa
P
100
30 40 50 60 70
Polymerized concentration(%)
Figure 2 The effect of paste fluidity to the polycarboxylate superplasticizer from different
polymerized concentration
The viscosity of the synthetic system was too low to be hampered the spread of monomer in the
early polymerization stage. The influence of polymerized concentration on the radical graft
copolymerization reaction intensified continually along with the prolonging of reaction time.
Gradually, the chain end rearrangement became blocking, and the activity end got embedded. It would
give rise to abort polymerization eventually. Everything taking into consideration, the best
polymerization concentration was 50%.
Influences of monomer feed ratio on the performance
The monomer feed determined the final large measure molecular structure of polycarboxylate
superplasticizer. The achieved experiment result which was shown in Fig.3, namely, the paste fluidity
improved with the adding the dosage of AA (represented by feed mole ratio AA: VPEG). It was
speculated as that the back bone charge density of polycarboxylate superplasticizer molecules was
further increased with increasing the dosage of AA. It brought about the adsorption of
polycarboxylate superplasticizer increasing in the early stage of hydration, for reason that charge
exclusion function can separate cement particle and water which exhibits disperse elevating on
macroscopic performance. When further increasing the dosage of AA, the main chain charge density
would be too dense, which the charge of back bone would influence mutually, the adsorption on the
cement particle declined and the performance deteriorated. So the best feed ratio was AA: VPEG =
1:4.
300
)m 0h
m(
yt260 1h
id
iu220
lf
et180
sa
P
140
2.75 3 3.25 3.5 3.75 4
feed ratio
Figure 3 The effect of paste fluidity to the polycarboxylate superplasticizer from different feed ratio
(AA/VPEG, mole)
From table 1, the synthetic product had very high water-reducing rate to 34.2%. We could conclude
that the concrete without addition polycarboxylate superplasticizer displayed worse than the one
addition polycarboxylate superplasticizer in freshly mixed concrete and hardened concrete.
Structural characterization
The analysis of chemical structure was carried by FT-IR and GPC. Fig.4 was the FT-IR spectra of
the synthetic polycarboxylate superplasticizer. Fig.5 was the GPC spectra of polycarboxylate
superplasticizer. The GPC result was shown in Table 2.
95
64 22.
64. .5
58 88. 345
90 024 52. 48
3.4 725 1
61 1 982 55
92 1 .0
85 251 19
5.5 .1
41 33 59
.1
80 53
1
T
% 06
45
75 6.2 .4
43 78
2
70
65
60 13
.3
01
1
55
4000 3000 2000 1000
Wavenumbers (cm-1)
CH2
Conclusions
(1) Through the experimental parameters adjustment, the optimal radical graft copolymerization
reaction conditions were as follows: 55℃, 0.75% dosage of Vc , Vc : H2O2 = 1:4, 50% polymerization
concentration, AA: VPEG = 3.25.
(2) The synthetic comb-like polycarboxylate superplasticizer had very high water-reducing, and
could improve the workability performance of freshly mixed concrete and compressive strength of
hardened concrete.
(3) The polycarboxylate superplasticizer contains hydrophilic main chain and hydrophobic
polyethylene oxide side chains, which can fabricate the expected performance through radical graft
copolymerization reaction by molecular designing.
References
[1] K. Yamada, S. Ogawa, T. Takahashi: 2nd international RILEM symposium on self compacting
concrete, Tokyo (2001), p. 159-168.
[2] J. Plank, B. Sachsenhauser, J. de Reese: Cem. Concr. Res. Vol 40 (2010), p. 699-709.
[3] K. Yamada, T. Takahashi, S. Hanehara, M. Matsuhisa: Cem. Concr. Res. Vol 30 (2000) , p.
197-207.
[4] F. Burank, S. Hasan: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol 22 (2008), p. 1972-1980.
[5] Z.R. Pan: Polymer chemistry (Third edition)(Chemical Industry Press, Beijing 2003), in Chinese.
[6] Y.H Fang, X.X Ma, M.M Gui, T.X. Lin: Concrete. Vol 254(2010), p.73-74, in Chinese.
Progress in Industrial and Civil Engineering
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.204-208