Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Opportunities
1 Course relevance and demand across industries 0.1
2 Student Volume encouraging right in the first year 0.06
3 Need for DT program is increasing 15% annually 0.05
4 Large local firms seek new certification programs from the institution 0.05
5 Awareness of innovative programs is on the rise 0.04
6 Demand for Cross-state and online programs growing 20% annually 0.05
7 The India GDP is rising 1.2% annually 0.05
8 Social media search for NMIMS is growing 6% annually 0.06
9 Linkedin and Facebook jobs for DT are at all time high 0.05
Threats
1 Local two-year institutions offer courses 20% cheaper and less rigorous 0.07
2 Cross-state students - 15% less volume than expected applications 0.06
3 State education policies fluctuating (changed 2 times in last 1 year) 0.08
4 Major rival peer institutions offer & heavily market online degrees in Mumbai 0.06
5 NMIMS revenues in a key MBA Tech program declined in 1 year 0.04
6 Unemployment rate stable at 9.0% causing many would-be students to work 0.04
7 The number of high school graduate is dropping 3% annually 0.05
8 The number for Integrated course registrations growing at 8% annually 0.06
9 Innovative new course in Political science attracting degree students (6% Reg) 0.03
Total 1
Conclusion:
Rating WScore
4 0.4
4 0.24
3 0.15
3 0.15
3 0.12
2 0.1
3 0.15
1 0.06
1 0.05
2 0.14
2 0.12
3 0.24
2 0.12
3 0.12
1 0.04
3 0.15
2 0.12
3 0.09
2.56
Strengths: Weight
1. Location in city center easy to transport and key facilities around 0.05
2. 20Cr technology investment for high-tech facilities 0.07
3. Diverse (28%) student body and faculty, vs Industry 21% 0.09
4. Visionary presidential leadership 0.04
5. Nationally-ranked programs in Business, Mgmt and Technology 0.11
6. diverse Extra-curr avenues with good participation raising visibility 0.05
7. State of the art Library and Canteen facility 0.04
8. Engineering and Mgmt buildings & infrastructure is brand new 0.03
9. good Student-faculty ratio (1:15) for quality education (India 1:24) 0.05
Weaknesses: Weight
1. Urban campus with limited space for expanding 0.05
2. Tuition fees 5% higher than peer ranked institutions 0.07
3. Gym and athletic facilities limited due to smaller urban campus 0.05
4. limited food options outside canteen (complaints 11% vs. prior year) 0.03
5. Multitude of courses causing confusion & value diffusion 0.04
6. Student satisfaction survey 1% drop from last year 0.06
7. Alumni activity 8% lesser than equivalent peers 0.05
8. 30% of classes taught by adjunct faculty 0.04
9. Parking of vehicles quite cumbersome due to urban center facility 0.08
1
Rating Score
4 0.2 Location
3 0.21 Technology investment
4 0.36 Student diversity (state, gender, race, eco status, education)
4 0.16 Leadership group VC, C, Directors and Deans
3 0.33 National ranking
3 0.15 Overall development & avenues
3 0.12 Tution fees
4 0.12 Facilities & real estate
4 0.2 Dorm facility
Rating Score
2 0.1 Space constraints (parking)
1 0.07 Traffic issues in reaching
1 0.05 Facilities less (Gym, athetic)
1 0.03 Food options outside canteen
2 0.08 Faculty age, quality
2 0.12 Student satisfaction
1 0.05 Alumni strength
2 0.08 Adjuct vs Full time faculty
1 0.08 Student/Faculty ratio
2.51
1) Political
FDI Limitations
Bureaucracy and Corruption
2) Economic
GDP
Tax treatment, import-export laws
4) Technology
impacting innovations
Potential disruptions
5) Environmental/Ecological
Environmental norms
CSR
6) Legal
Tariff and Tax laws
Cheap Workforce and Minimum Wage for employees
Porter’s Five Forces [High, Medium or Low]
i. Extent of rivalry between competitors
ii. Threat of entry
iii. Threat of substitutes
iv. Bargaining power of buyers
iv. Bargaining power of suppliers