Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experiment-18
Group-5
BITS Pilani
Madhav Rathi Himanshu Chaturvedi Himanshu Singh
(2018A1PS0031P) (2018A1PS0025P)
(2018A1PS0723P)
Avish Goel
Gaurav Bellal Natesh (2018A1PS0734P)
(2018A1PS0027P)
Experiment: 18
Control Valve Characteristics
1. Aim:
Study of control valve characteristics
2. Objective:
● To study inherent characteristics of different types of valves
● To study installed characteristics of different types of valves
● To study hysteresis of different types of valves
3. Observations:
Linear Valve:
Installed Characteristics:
2
Madhav Rathi Himanshu Chaturvedi Himanshu Singh
(2018A1PS0031P) (2018A1PS0025P)
(2018A1PS0723P)
Avish Goel
Gaurav Bellal Natesh (2018A1PS0734P)
(2018A1PS0027P)
Installed Characteristics:
2 2 290 0.59
3 4 300 0.78
3
Madhav Rathi Himanshu Chaturvedi Himanshu Singh
(2018A1PS0031P) (2018A1PS0025P)
(2018A1PS0723P)
Avish Goel
Gaurav Bellal Natesh (2018A1PS0734P)
(2018A1PS0027P)
4 6 310 0.9
Installed Characteristic:
4
Madhav Rathi Himanshu Chaturvedi Himanshu Singh
(2018A1PS0031P) (2018A1PS0025P)
(2018A1PS0723P)
Avish Goel
Gaurav Bellal Natesh (2018A1PS0734P)
(2018A1PS0027P)
4. Sample Calculations:
The following table gives the installed and inherent characteristics of a linear control
valve.
5
Madhav Rathi Himanshu Chaturvedi Himanshu Singh
(2018A1PS0031P) (2018A1PS0025P)
(2018A1PS0723P)
Avish Goel
Gaurav Bellal Natesh (2018A1PS0734P)
(2018A1PS0027P)
Lift (cm) Flow Rate (LPH) Cv Lift (cm) Flow Rate (LPH) Cv
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 270 2.840248564 4 210 2.459929848
8 400 4.295264751 8 330 3.865604046
12 490 5.497766092 12 470 5.505557278
14 530 6.058772526
The two graphs above show a comparison of inherent and installed characteristics of the
linear valve. The graph clearly resonates with the theory and the label of the valve. Also,
it can be noted that the installed characteristics look a bit more towards the quick-acting
control valve as mentioned in the theory. However, the deviation is not very significant
which implies that the control valve operates with almost the same characteristics as rated
by the manufacturer.
The table below shows the hysteresis data for the linear control valve.
6
Madhav Rathi Himanshu Chaturvedi Himanshu Singh
(2018A1PS0031P) (2018A1PS0025P)
(2018A1PS0723P)
Avish Goel
Gaurav Bellal Natesh (2018A1PS0734P)
(2018A1PS0027P)
Hysteresis
Actuator Water ∆P Water ∆P
Histeresis
P flow rate (cm H₂o) Cv flow rate (cm H₂o) Cv
(%)
(kg/cm²) (LPH) (LPH)
Increasing Actuator Pressure Decreasing Actuator Pressure
0 0 148 0 0 148 0
0.7 270 124 2.840248564 280 128 2.899055127 2.028473457
0.8 400 119 4.295264751 400 120 4.277330373 0.4175383581
1.2 490 109 5.497766092 500 110 5.584407338 1.551485071
1.9 530 105 6.058772526 540 106 6.143901643 1.385587241
Avg.
Hysteresis 1.345771032
From the table and the graph, it is evident that the hysteresis is very less. The average
hysteresis is just 1.345%. Through this, it can be inferred that the dynamics remain
7
Madhav Rathi Himanshu Chaturvedi Himanshu Singh
(2018A1PS0031P) (2018A1PS0025P)
(2018A1PS0723P)
Avish Goel
Gaurav Bellal Natesh (2018A1PS0734P)
(2018A1PS0027P)
almost the same while taking the reading from above and below. This reduced hysteresis
will ensure that during the actual operations the fluctuations will be less.
Lift (cm) Flow Rate (LPH) Cv Lift (cm) Flow Rate (LPH) Cv
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 540 7.670836583 4 290 2.979406419
8 590 9.235521538 8 300 3.082144571
12 590 9.235521538 12 310 3.184882723
The two graphs above show a comparison of inherent and installed characteristics of the
quick opening valve. The graph clearly resonates with the theory and the label of the
valve. Also, it can be noted that the installed characteristics are deviating a lot from the
inherent characteristics. It should also be noted that after reaching the lift of 4 cm the
flow rate from the valve almost remains the same in case of inherent characteristics, this
implies that flow rate quickly changes to maximum when lift reaches 4 and then stays
constant. Although installed characteristics show a better performance in this regard as
the value remains constants after 8 cm
8
Madhav Rathi Himanshu Chaturvedi Himanshu Singh
(2018A1PS0031P) (2018A1PS0025P)
(2018A1PS0723P)
Avish Goel
Gaurav Bellal Natesh (2018A1PS0734P)
(2018A1PS0027P)
The table below shows the hysteresis data for the linear control valve.
Hysteresis
Actuator Water ∆P Water ∆P
Histeresis
P flow rate (cm H₂o) Cv flow rate (cm H₂o) Cv
(%)
(kg/cm²) (LPH) (LPH)
Increasing Actuator Pressure Decreasing Actuator Pressure
0 0 148 0 0 148 0
0.8 540 68 7.670836583 540 70 7.420450578 3.264129051
1 590 56 9.235521538 580 56 9.078987274 1.694915254
1.4 590 56 9.235521538 590 56 9.235521538 0
Avg.
Hysteresis 1.653014769
From the table and the graph, it is evident that the hysteresis is very less. The average
hysteresis is just 1.653%. Through this, it can be inferred that the dynamics remain
9
Madhav Rathi Himanshu Chaturvedi Himanshu Singh
(2018A1PS0031P) (2018A1PS0025P)
(2018A1PS0723P)
Avish Goel
Gaurav Bellal Natesh (2018A1PS0734P)
(2018A1PS0027P)
almost the same while taking the reading from above and below. This reduced hysteresis
will ensure that during the actual operations the fluctuations will be less.
Lift (cm) Flow Rate (LPH) Cv Lift (cm) Flow Rate (LPH) Cv
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 100 1.004463068 4 80 0.893505174
8 210 2.133029695 8 170 1.898698495
12 400 4.078274492 12 360 4.020773283
14 510 5.645008394 14
The two graphs above show a comparison of inherent and installed characteristics of the
equal percentage valve. The graph clearly resonates with the theory and the label of the
valve. It can be seen that the deviation of installed characteristics from inherent
characteristics is not very significant which implies that the control valve operates with
almost the same characteristics as rated by the manufacturer.
1
Madhav Rathi Himanshu Chaturvedi Himanshu Singh
(2018A1PS0031P) (2018A1PS0025P)
(2018A1PS0723P)
Avish Goel
Gaurav Bellal Natesh (2018A1PS0734P)
(2018A1PS0027P)
The table below shows the hysteresis data for the linear control valve.
Hysteresis
Actuator Water ∆P Water ∆P
Histeresis
P flow rate (cm H₂o) Cv flow rate (cm H₂o) Cv
(%)
(kg/cm²) (LPH) (LPH)
Increasing Actuator Pressure Decreasing Actuator Pressure
0 510 112 5.645008394 510 112 5.645008394 0
0.4 400 122 4.242125409 400 132 4.078274492 3.862472247
0.65 220 132 2.243050971 210 133 2.133029695 4.904983301
0.8 120 136 1.205355681 100 136 1.004463068 16.66666667
1.85 0 148 0 0 148 0
Avg.
Hysteresis 6.358530554
From the table and the graph, it is evident that the hysteresis is relatively more than the
other two valves. The average hysteresis is 6.358%. Through this, it can be inferred that
1
Madhav Rathi Himanshu Chaturvedi Himanshu Singh
(2018A1PS0031P) (2018A1PS0025P)
(2018A1PS0723P)
Avish Goel
Gaurav Bellal Natesh (2018A1PS0734P)
(2018A1PS0027P)
the dynamics have a considerable difference while taking the reading from above and
below. But it as the value of average hysteresis is not very large thus it is safe to use in
control operations.
6. Conclusion:
● All the control valve show installed and inherent characteristics as expected and
accordance with the theory
● The average hysteresis for linear, quick opening and equal percentage is 1.34%, 1.64%
and 6.35% respectively.