Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROF ED 8
(Assessment and Evaluation of Student Learning)
Task 2
I- FLA 2
Direction: Create a 30 items multiple choice type with Table of Specification (Pls. See the Attached
Sample)
Direction: Try to recall some of your strongest memories of exams and testing from your high school or
elementary years.
What were your most positive evaluation experiences? Describe. Conversely, What where the
most negative ones? Why?
Are there adequate evaluation opportunities in all learning areas? Are there a variety of evaluation
processes used? What are these?
V. Formative Test
Direction: Read and answer the following questions carefully:
a. Measurement
b. Evaluation
c. Test
d. Grading
2. Discuss briefly the different characteristics of good test. Give concrete examples.
Taxonomy of Objectives
No. Type No. of % of
Contents/ Topics of Cognitive Psycho- of Test Items Items
Days Affective
Remembering Understanding Applying Analyzing Evaluating Creating motor
1. Describing mixture 5 5 2, 6 1 4 18 3 MC 7 21 %
2. Describing the presence
3 7, 8 MC 2 7%
of solution
3. Altering solute from
3 19 9, 10 MC 3 14 %
solvent
4. Assuming that not all
solutes dissolve in all 2 11 12 13 MC 3 7%
solvents
5. Components Affecting the
Solubility of Solutes in a 2 14 15, 16 17 MC 4
Solvent 14 %
Direction: Try to recall some of your strongest memories of exams and testing from your high school or
elementary years.
What were your most positive evaluation experiences? Describe. Conversely, What where the
most negative ones? Why?
When I was a senior in high school, I had my most positive evaluation experience. It was
prepared by Ms. Julie Ann Lucero, our oral communication teacher, and her sets of
questionnaires for each examination were very unique and cheat-free. The most
interesting exam I took from her was the one that required two attempts. There were two
sets of questionnaires that she had prepared and distributed alternately to all of her
students, so there was no way for us, all of us, to cheat. Her methods were admirable and
effective; they could truly test a student's understanding rather than their ability to cheat.
My most negative experience, on the other hand, occurred during my high school years.
There was a teacher who used to make a forty-item questionnaire every exam, with a lot
of the same questions. Her exams were very simple to complete, and based on the
structure of the questions, it appears that they were copied identically from the book. She
didn't bother to edit them, and the questionnaire's appearance and layout were completely
unpresentable. I felt terrible for her and her students. Instead of studying, her students put
in little effort and largely disregard the subject. I believe she lacks knowledge of how to
implement effective responses to the learners' evaluations. She also likely hasn't had the
opportunity to observe or listen to the fundamentals of what a teacher should do.
Are there adequate evaluation opportunities in all learning areas? Are there a variety of evaluation
processes used? What are these?
Yes, there are sufficient opportunities for evaluation in all learning areas. A variety of
evaluation methods are also employed. Formative and summative evaluations are the two
types of evaluations. Formative evaluations are carried out during the development of your
students and are helpful if you want to know how to achieve your objectives as a teacher.
Summative evaluations should be completed once your students have established
themselves, and they will tell you how well they are achieving their objectives.
There are various types of evaluation within the formative and summative categories.
Needs assessment and process or implementation evaluation are two components of
formative evaluation. On the other hand, summative evaluation includes outcome and
impact evaluations. The aforementioned types of evaluation provide adequate evaluation
opportunities in various learning areas, which will undoubtedly benefit both teachers and
students.
V. Formative Test
Direction: Read and answer the following questions carefully:
a. Measurement
Measurement measures students' intelligence, talents, capacities, and desires is the
science and activity of gathering information regarding their characteristics. It is
important in a way that it teaches students about the importance of testing in the
learning process, including how to properly evaluate evaluations and standardized tests
and how to use data more effectively in their everyday classroom teaching.
b. Evaluation
Evaluation is the systematic method of recording and using longitudinal evidence on
experience, ability, behaviors, and values to optimize programs and enhance student
learning. Evaluation aids in the development of a training curriculum, the assessment of
its accomplishments, and the enhancement of its efficacy. It also aids in determining
what performs well and what should be changed in a program or project.
c. Test
Testing is a tool used to assess students' competence or abilities to perform a certain
assignment. They are used to assess whether students have learned what was required
of them, as well as the extent or degree to which students have learned the subject.
They can be used to assess academic success and accomplishment, as well as the
efficacy of instructional programmes.
d. Grading
Grading is a method for educators to assess each student's achievement and learning.
Grading also gives students insight on their own learning, clarifying what they
understand, what they don't understand, and where they can develop. Grading also
provides teachers with insight on their students' learning, which can be used to guide
prospective teaching decisions.
2. Discuss briefly the different characteristics of good test. Give concrete examples.
The four major characteristics of a good test are shown in the following points.
1. The first major characteristic of a successful test is its validity. The evaluation
must really calculate what it is supposed to measure. The validity of a test is often
measured by investigating how the test scores conform to certain parameters,
such as the same conduct, personal achievement, or trait that represents the
quality that the test was intended to evaluate.
2. A successful test should be extremely reliable. This assumes that the exam can
produce identical outcomes even though it is administered by different testers,
different people score in different aspects of the test, and the same person takes
the test at two or three different times. Typically, reliability is determined by
comparing various sets of ratings.
3. A vital feature of a successful test is objectivity. It has an effect on both the validity
and reliability of test results. The degree to which multiple people rating the
response receipt arrive at the same outcome is referred to as the objectivity of a
measurement instrument.
4. In addition to validity, reliability and objectivity, a good test needs norms. Norms
are collections of scores earned by those for which the exam is designed
(students). These groups' scores serve as a foundation for interpreting any
individual ranking.