Design of KBT River System and Reconstruction of Bridges

Study of the Dolok-Penggaron River System
and Design of the East Floodway, Final Report

under JICA Loan IP-534 on Flood Control
CHAPTER 10. PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF THE KBT (FEASIBILITY

STUDY LEVEL) AND TYPICAL DESIGN OF THE BABON,
DOMBO-SAYUNG AND DOLOK RIVERS (MASTER PLAN
LEVEL)
10.1 Preliminary Design of the KBT

10.1.1 Design of Longitudinal Profile and Cross Sections
Considering the conditions along the KBT from the river mouth to Pucang Gading having a
distance of 14.40 km long, the design flood discharge of 50-year return period and the design
profile is divided into three (3) reaches, they are:
 Upstream Reach (Reach 1): From the inlet gate at Pucang Gading to the junction with
the Kedung Mundu River (tributary)
The design discharge is 140m3/s.
 Mid-stream Reach (Reach 2): From the junction with the Kedung Mundu River
(tributary) to the junction with the Candi River (tributary)
The design discharge is 220 m3/s.
 Downstream Reach (Reach 3): From junction with the Candi river (tributary) to the
river mouth
The design discharge is 260 m3/s. The design bed gradient is almost same as the
present bed gradient of the lowest riverbed.
Based on the hydraulic calculations with 200m intervals (see Section 9.5), design longitudinal
profile of the KBT are shown in Figure 10.1 .1 to Figure 10.1 .3 (see also ANNEX V).
The design cross section along the KBT is divided into three (3) types as follows:
 Type 1(vertical/concrete sheet pile type):
Type 1 is applied in the downstream reach from the river mouth to upstream of Ring
Road Bridge. This structure is applied due to consideration of the difficulties of
providing coffering and dewatering in the construction stage, where the riverbed is 1
– 1.5m under the design sea water level of EL. 0.60m. Type 1 is applied to make
construction activity to be easier.
 Type 2 (revetment by concrete frame with stone masonry):

Type 2 is applied from the upstream of Ring Road Bridge to Majaphit Bridge and
from Freeway Bridge to the inlet gate at Pucang Gading. This structure is applied due
to possibility of providing coffering and dewatering (water depth is less than 1m)
and/or without dewatering.
 Type 3 (leaning wall type):

Type 3 is applied between Majapahit Bridge to Freeway Bridge. This structure is
applied due to existence of roads along the both riverbanks or for narrowing space
(difficulties of land acquisition).
The design cross section types for KBT are shown in the Figure 10.1 .4 to Figure 10.1 .5.
CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 1

with Associates
Final Report and Design of the East Floodway,
on Flood Control under JICA Loan IP-534
Figure 10.1.1 KBT: Design Longitudinal Profile (1/3)
2 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

with Associates

with Associates

with Associates
Figure 10.1.4 KBT Downstream Reach: Typical Design Cross Sections

with Associates
Figure 10.1.5 KBT Mid-stream to Upstream Reaches: Typical Design Cross Sections

with Associates
10.1.2 Reconstruction of Bridges

Basically reconstruction of the bridges in East Floodway (KBT) are based on the preliminary design of the cross
sections, where the span length of the existing bridges are too short comparing with the width of design cross section.
Besides that, there are some bridges, which have been damaged. The bridges that will be reconstructed consist of two
kinds / types of bridge. They are Road Bridge and Pedestrian Bridge. Preliminary designs of these bridges are shown
in Figure 10.1 .6 to Figure 10.1 .9.
(1) Road Bridge

Material of the existing all road bridge are concrete. Hence, reconstruction of the road
bridges will also use concrete material. Beam/girder will be pre-stressed concrete while
the other parts (slab, pier, etc.) will be in situ concrete. The piers and abutments will be
equipped with concrete pile.
Table 10.1.1 Reconstruction of Road Bridge Preliminary Design
Length of Span (m)
Width of
Nos of
No Name of Bridge Station Bridge Remarks
Reconstr Pier
Existing (m)
uction
1. Lamper Sari 7+600 57 78 1+7+1 2 1 pier in water flow
2. Gemah Permai 10+500 13 44 1+7+1 1 1 pier in water flow
3. Ampo Sari 10+700 24 50 1+7+1 1 1 pier in water flow
(2) Pedestrian Bridge

Steel material that is used in the existing all pedestrian bridges will be changed to
concrete material for reconstruction. Beam/girder will be pre-stressed concrete, while the
other parts (slab, pier, etc.) will be in situ concrete. The piers and abutments will be
equipped with concrete pile. Preliminary design data for reconstruction of each pedestrian
bridge in the KBT are described in the table below:
Table 10.1.2 Reconstruction of Pedestrian Bridges of the KBT
Length of Span (m)
Width of
N Nos of
Name of Bridge Station Bridge Remarks
o Recons Pier
Existing (m)
truction
1. Pedestrian Bridge 3+086 135*) 114 3.50 6 2 pier in water flow
2. Pedestrian Bridge 3+900 122*) 114 3.50 6 2 pier in water flow
3. Pedestrian Bridge 10+214 35 46 3.50 1 1 pier in water flow
*)
The existing pedestrian bridges are not perpendicular to center line of KBT.

with Associates
Figure 10.1.6 KBT Downstream Reach: Preliminary Design of Reconstruction of

Bridges (Pedestrian Bridge at Station EF 3+100)

with Associates
Figure 10.1.7 KBT Downstream Reach: Preliminary Design of Reconstruction of

Bridges (Pedestrian Bridge at Station EF 3+850)

with Associates
Figure 10.1.8 KBT Mid-stream to Upstream Reaches: Preliminary Design of the

Reconstruction of Bridges (1/2)

with Associates
Figure 10.1.9 KBT Mid-stream to Upstream Reaches: Preliminary Design of the

Reconstruction of Bridges (2/2)

with Associates
10.1.3 River Amenity Plan for the KBT Downstream Reach

A concept including zoning of the amenity plan along the downstream reach of the KBT is proposed. By utilizing the
space of the high water channels on the both sides of the KBT in the downstream reach, recreation zones and sports
zones as well as jogging course etc. are proposed. It is expected that people living around the KBT downstream reach
as well as citizens in Semarang City and surrounding areas will come and utilize these amenity spaces for their daily
communication, recreation and sports.
It is recommended to involve people in the surrounding areas of the KBT downstream reach as well as people in the
City to start discussion on the detailed amenity plan including cooperation to the management of the amenity space
by people considering people’s participation approach.
Figure 10.1 .10 to Figure 10.1 .12 show the proposed zoning of the river amenity plan.
Note: Photos are images from internet.

Figure 10.1.10 KBT: River Amenity Zoning Plan (1/3)

with Associates



with Associates
10.2 Typical Design of the Babon River

10.2.1 Design Longitudinal Profile and Typical Design Cross Sections
Considering the condition along the Babon River from the river mouth to Pucang Gading Weir
having a distance of 17.00 km length, the design discharge along the Babon River is set at 270
m3/s for Alt-1 and 180m3/s for Alt-2. Based on the hydraulic calculations with 200m intervals
cross section data along the Babon River, the design longitudinal profile is set as shown in
Figure 10.2 .13 to Figure 10.2 .15 and also in ANNEX VI.
The typical design cross sections of the Babon River are divided into the following three (3)
types:
 Type 1(soil type) :

Type 1 is set in the downstream part from the river mouth to Semarang-Demak Bridge
of Pantura Road. This structure is applied due to consideration on the difficulties for
providing coffering and dewatering in the construction stage (the riverbed is 2 – 2.5m
under the design sea water level of EL. 0.60m), and for making the construction
activity to be easier.
 Type 2 (leaning wall type) :

Type 2 is set between Semarang-Demak Bridge and Kudu Bridge. This structure is
applied due to the width of channel, which is very narrow, availability of existing
roads in the both sides of riverbanks and difficulties of land acquisition (social
problem).
 Type 3 (revetment by concrete frame with stone masonry):

Type 3 is set from Kudu Bridge to Pucang Gading Weir. This structure is applied due
to possibility of providing coffering and dewatering (water depth is less than 1m or
without dewatering).
The typical design cross section of the above three types of the Babon River are shown in the Figure 10.2 .16 and
Figure 10.2 .17.

with Associates
Figure 10.2.13 Babon River: Design Longitudinal Profile for Alt-1 and Alt-2 (1/3)

with Associates
Figure 10.2.14 Babon River: Design Longitudinal Profile of Alt-1 and Alt-2 (2/3)

with Associates
Figure 10.2.15 Babon River: Design Longitudinal Profile of Alt-1 and Alt-2 (3/3)

with Associates
Figure 10.2.16 Babon River: Typical Design Cross Sections of Alt-1

with Associates
Figure 10.2.17 Babon River: Typical Cross Sections of Alt-2

with Associates
10.3 Typical Design of the Dombo-Sayung River

10.3.1 Design of Longitudinal Profile and Typical Cross Section
The total length of Dombo – Sayung River from the river mouth up to Gergaji Weir is about 19 km. The design
discharge is based on the flood discharge of 50-year return period.
There are two (2) alternatives design as follows:
(1) Alternative-1 (Alt-1)

The design longitudinal profile of the Alt-1 is divided into the following five (5) stretches.
Stretch-1 (River Mouth Reach): From Sta. 0 to Sta. 4 + 200 with design discharge of 160
m3/s and design river bed gradient of 1 : 4,000.
Stretch-2 (Downstream Reach): From Sta. 4 + 200 to Sta. 8 + 000 with design discharge
of 135 m3/s and design river bed gradient of 1 : 2,700.
Stretch-3 (Mid-stream Reach): From Sta. 8 + 000 to Sta. 15 + 000 with design discharge
Stretch-4 (Upstream Reach): From Sta. 15 + 000 to Sta. 17 + 400 with design
discharge of 120 m3/s and design river bed gradient of 1 :
303.
Stretch-5 ( Upstream Reach): From Sta. 17 + 400 to Sta. 19 + 001 with design
discharge of 120 m3/s and design gradient of 1 : 179.
Based on the data and hydraulic calculation, the design longitudinal profile and typical design cross section are set.
The design longitudinal profile is shown in Figure 10.3.1 to Figure 10.3.3 (see also Annex VI).
(2) Alternative-2 (Alt-2)

The design longitudinal profile of the Alt-2 is divided into the following five (5) stretches
as well.
Stretch-1 (River Mouth Reach): From Sta. 0 to Sta. 4 + 200 with design discharge of 85
m3/s and design river bed gradient of 1 : 4,000.
Stretch-2 (Downstream Reach): From Sta. 4 + 200 to Sta. 8 + 000 with design discharge
Stretch-3 (Mid-stream Reach): From Sta. 8 + 000 to Sta. 15 + 000 with design discharge
Stretch-4 (Upstream Reach): From Sta. 15 + 000 to Sta. 17 + 400 with design
discharge of 70 m3/s and design river bed gradient of 1 :
303.
Stretch-5 ( Upstream Reach): From Sta. 17 + 400 to Sta. 19 + 001 with design

with Associates
discharge of 70 m3/s and design gradient of 1 : 179.

Design longitudinal profile of Alt-2 is same as that of Alt-1 (see Figure 10.3.1 and 10.3.3).
(3) Typical Design Cross Sections

Typical design cross sections of the Dombo-Sayung River consist of the following two (2)
types.
Type 1: Revetment by concrete frame with stone masonry is applied from the
downstream to Majapahit Bridge and Freeway Bridge to Gergaji weir. This
structure is applied due to possibility of coffering and dewatering (for water
depth is less than 1m).
Type 2: Revetment by gabion mattress, this structure is applied at embankment portion.
Figure 10.3.4 and Figure 10.3.5 shows the typical design cross sections of the Alt-1 and
Alt-2 respectively.

with Associates
Figure 10.3.18 Dombo-Sayung River: Design Longitudinal Profile of Alt-1 and Alt-2 (1/3)

with Associates

with Associates

with Associates
Figure 10.3.21 Dombo-Sayung River: Typical Design Cross Sections (Alt-1)

with Associates
Figure 10.3.22 Dombo-Sayung River: Typical Design Cross Sections (Alt-2)

with Associates
10.4 Typical Design of the Dolok River including Bypass Floodway

10.4.1 Design Longitudinal Profile and Typical Cross Sections
Total length of Dolok River from the river mouth up to Kebon Batur Canal is 27+600 km.
Upstream from the bifurcation to the Kebon Batur Canal to the end of mountain foot is about
3km.
Alternative 1 (Alt-1) and Alternative 3 (Alt-3)
Design longitudinal profile of the Dolok River is divided into six (6) stretches as follows:
Stretch 1: From river mouth (Sta. 0) to Sta. 4+600 with design bed gradient of 1 :
5,000.
Stretch 2: Downstream reach from Sta. 4+600 to Sta. 9+400, with design bed
gradient of 1 : 2,500.
Stretch 3: Mid-stream reach from Sta. 9+400 to Sta. 13+400, with design bed
gradient of 1 : 1,000.
Stretch 4: Mid-stream reach from Sta. 13+400 to Sta. 18+800, with design bed
gradient of 1 : 630.
Stretch 5: Upstream reach from Sta. 18+800 to Sta. 23+000 with design bed gradient
of 1 : 385.
Stretch 6: Upstream reach from Sta. 23+000 to Sta. 27+800.
Based on hydrological calculation, design discharge with 50-year return period is as

follows:
Alt-1: Q= 380 m3/s. Short cut will be applied from Kebon Batur Channel to
Mranggen Bridge.
Alt-3: Q= 200 m3/s. Short cut will be also applied from Kebon Batur Channel to
Mranggen Bridge.
Figure 10.4.1 to Figure 10.4.5 as well as ANNEX VII shows the design longitudinal profile
of the Dolok River Alt-1 and Alt-3. Figure 10.4.6 and Figure 10.4.7 shows the typical
design cross sections of the Alt-1 and Alt-3.
Alternative 2 (Alt-2) and Alternative 4 (Alt-4)
Design longitudinal profile of the Dolok River of Alt-2 and Alt-4 is divided into six (6)
stretches as follows:

with Associates
Stretch 1: River mouth (Sta. 0) to Sta. 4+600 with design of bed gradient of 1 : 5,000.
Stretch 2: Downstream reach from Sta. 4+600 to Sta. 9+400 with design bed gradient
of 1 : 2,500.
Stretch 3: Midstream reach from Sta. 9+400 to Sta. 16+200 with design bed gradient
of 1 : 1,000.
Stretch 4: Bypass Floodway from Sta. 16+200 to Sta. 17+800 with design bed
gradient of 1: 1,000.
Based on the hydrological calculation, design discharge of 50-year return period of flood is
as follows:
Alternative 2 : Q= 380 m3/s.
Alternative 4 : Q= 200 m3/s.
Bypass Floodway from Dolok River Sta. 25+400 to Sta. 16+800 will be constructed in both
Alternative 2 and 4.
Design of cross section along Dolok River consists of three (3) types as follows,
Type 1: Revetment by concrete frame with stone masonry, in the upstream reach from
Sta. 27+800 to Sta. 4+800
Type 2: Revetment with gabion mattress for river dike in the mostly embankment
stretch
Type 3: Dyke without revetment and only sod facing in the downstream reach from
Sta. 0 to Sta. 4+800.
For Alternative 2 and 4, in the Bypass Floodway, Revetment type 1 will be applied.
Figure 10.4.8 to Figure 10.4.12 as well as ANNEX VII shows the design longitudinal
profile of the Dolok River Alt-1 and Alt-3. Figure 10.4.13 and Figure 10.4.14 shows the
typical design cross sections of the Alt-2 and Alt-4.

with Associates
Figure 10.4.23 Dolok River: Design Longitudinal Profile of Alt-1 and Alt-3 (1/5)

with Associates

with Associates

with Associates

with Associates

with Associates
Figure 10.4.28 Dolok River Alt-1: Typical Design Cross Sections

with Associates

with Associates

with Associates

with Associates

with Associates

with Associates

with Associates

with Associates

with Associates
*DO NOT PRINT THIS PAGE
内容
Chapter 10. Preliminary Design of the KBT (FEASIBILITY STUDY LEVEL) AND typical
design of the babon, dombo-sayung and dolok rivers (master pan level) 10–1
10.1 Preliminary Design of KBT 10–1
10.1.1 Design of Longitudinal Profile and Cross Sections 10–1
10.1.2 Reconstruction of Bridges 10–3
10.1.3 River Amenity Plan for the KBT Downstream Reach 10–3
10.2 Typical Design of the Babon River 10–3
10.2.1 Design Longitudinal Profile and Typical Design Cross Sections 10–3
10.3 Typical Design of the Dombo-Sayung River 10–3
10.3.1 Design of Longitudinal Profile and Typical Cross Section 10–3
10.4 Typical Design of the Dolok River including Bypass Floodway 10–3
10.4.1 Design Longitudinal Profile and Typical Cross Sections 10–3

Design of KBT River System and Reconstruction of Bridges

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design of KBT River System and Reconstruction of Bridges

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Study of the Dolok-Penggaron River System

and Design of the East Floodway, Final Report

CHAPTER 10. PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF THE KBT (FEASIBILITY

10.1 Preliminary Design of the KBT

 Type 2 (revetment by concrete frame with stone masonry):

 Type 3 (leaning wall type):

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 1

Figure 10.1.1 KBT: Design Longitudinal Profile (1/3)

2 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

Figure 10.1.2 KBT: Design Longitudinal Profile (2/3)

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 3

Figure 10.1.3 KBT: Design Longitudinal Profile (3/3)

4 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

Figure 10.1.4 KBT Downstream Reach: Typical Design Cross Sections

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 5

6 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

10.1.2 Reconstruction of Bridges

(1) Road Bridge

1. Lamper Sari 7+600 57 78 1+7+1 2 1 pier in water flow

2. Gemah Permai 10+500 13 44 1+7+1 1 1 pier in water flow

3. Ampo Sari 10+700 24 50 1+7+1 1 1 pier in water flow

(2) Pedestrian Bridge

1. Pedestrian Bridge 3+086 135*) 114 3.50 6 2 pier in water flow

2. Pedestrian Bridge 3+900 122*) 114 3.50 6 2 pier in water flow

3. Pedestrian Bridge 10+214 35 46 3.50 1 1 pier in water flow

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 7

Figure 10.1.6 KBT Downstream Reach: Preliminary Design of Reconstruction of

8 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

Figure 10.1.7 KBT Downstream Reach: Preliminary Design of Reconstruction of

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 9

Figure 10.1.8 KBT Mid-stream to Upstream Reaches: Preliminary Design of the

10 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

Figure 10.1.9 KBT Mid-stream to Upstream Reaches: Preliminary Design of the

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 11

10.1.3 River Amenity Plan for the KBT Downstream Reach

Note: Photos are images from internet.

12 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

Note: Photos are images from internet.

Note: Photos are images from internet.

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 13

10.2 Typical Design of the Babon River

 Type 1(soil type) :

 Type 2 (leaning wall type) :

 Type 3 (revetment by concrete frame with stone masonry):

14 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 15

16 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 17

Figure 10.2.16 Babon River: Typical Design Cross Sections of Alt-1

18 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

Figure 10.2.17 Babon River: Typical Cross Sections of Alt-2

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 19

10.3 Typical Design of the Dombo-Sayung River

(1) Alternative-1 (Alt-1)

(2) Alternative-2 (Alt-2)

20 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

discharge of 70 m3/s and design gradient of 1 : 179.

(3) Typical Design Cross Sections

Type 2: Revetment by gabion mattress, this structure is applied at embankment portion.

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 21

22 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 23