Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summer Internship Guidelines AY 2021-22 - 1 MET PGDM
Summer Internship Guidelines AY 2021-22 - 1 MET PGDM
for
Summer Internship Program
1. Initial Information Report- Submitting one-page description of the project by the student.
4. Final Report- Submitting the detailed report and making a presentation to the faculty in
coordination with the company professional expert.
Evaluation
Evaluation shall be done at various stages of internship on an ongoing basis by the Faculty Guide. The
details are:
Evaluation Schedule
Evaluation Process
The details of evaluation parameters, reports to be submitted and the details of presentations are described in the
following paragraphs. The Faculty Guide will rate the performance of the student on each parameter at each stage.
Faculty guide should coordinate with concerned person in the company with respect to project & performance.
Step I: Initial Information Report (IIR) will be submitted by the students to Faculty Guide as per the
format given below
IV. I will submit the following reports as per the schedule given below:
Evaluation component: Date Planned:
Project Proposal ...............................................................................................................
Interim Report ...................................................................................................................
Final Report ......................................................................................................................
Faculty Guide Name: ........................................................................................................
i. Synopsis: A statement of about 1000 words describing what the project is about.
ii. Objective: Stating what the project will accomplish and the value-addition to the
organization.
iii. Limitations of the Study.
iv. Proposed Methodology.
v. Schedule: A time frame indicating steps that will be required and the expected date when they
will be completed.
vi. References: Initial list of bibliographic and Internet materials that would be used to complete the
project.
S. Weightage
Parameter Description %
No.
Sub Total 15
Note: Copies of Project Proposal will be submitted by the students as per the format given below.
It should be submitted to the faculty Guide on or before .
Name: Enrollment No:
Date
Signature of the Student
Step III: Interim Evaluation
The Interim Evaluation of the SIP Project consists of Report and Presentation.
Report: The Interim Report is an interim version of the Final Report. By this time the student would
have done substantial work on the project. This report is an attempt to document the work done so far by
the student and how to proceed further. An interim report must contain:
(iii) Introduction
(v) Main text (should contain detailed progress of the project and discussions till date.)
(iv) References
4 Reading/Referencing of literature 4
Sub Total 15
Step IV: Final Evaluation
Report: The Final Report (project report), the written component of evaluation, is to be submitted on
completion of the project. The Project Reports are to be prepared based on the guidelines (Refer down)
given.
S. Weightage
Parameter Description
No. %
Final Report
S. Weightage
Parameter Description
No. %
2 Code of conduct 3
4 Email Etiquette/Attire 3
6 Trustworthiness 4
Sub Total 20
Step VI: Project Specific Evaluation along with Final Presentation
Project Specific Evaluation is the precise evaluation of a particular project will be done
by a group of faculty & industry experts. The maximum marks awarded for this are 20.
The evaluation is carried out on a 10-point scale for each parameter. The details of evaluation
parameters for Project Specific Evaluation are given below:
Weightage
S. No. Parameter Description
%
Sub total 20
Total 100
1. Prior to reporting to the SIP organization, the Faculty Guide should brief the students in detail about the SIP.
2. The Faculty Guide should facilitate the student to undertake a meaningful project, provide necessary
academic guidance and facilitate evaluation with the help of the company executives.
3. The faculty is required to explain to all the executives he/she is interacting in the SIP organization, the basic
tenets and features of the SIP and the importance attached to it.
4. During this period of 8 weeks the Faculty Guide has the entire responsibility of the student’s performance. It
is therefore necessary that faculty meet the students to periodically monitor their work. During the
interaction with students, the students are to be informed about their performance, progress, strengths and
weaknesses as observed through the various evaluation components and also the ways for improvement and
to offer clarifications sought by students.
5. Faculty is advised to ensure that the student discusses the progress made and seek clarification of any
doubts related to work with the Company Guide experts.
6. Faculty Guide should interact with the Company experts regularly. This exercise is initially to chalk out an
effective interaction plan and later to know about the student’s progress in relation to the quality and
quantity of work put in by the student. The exercise helps in continuous monitoring and guiding the student
in the assigned work.
7. The Faculty Guide should be involved at all stages beginning from the ‘definition of the work content’ to
the project completion.
8. Faculty Guide should advise the students to complete the project within the stipulated time. A student who
does not give opportunity for evaluation should be given a warning at each stage of evaluation as required.
9. Faculty Guide will submit a progress report to HOI at every stage of evaluation, showing the progress made
by the students allocated to him/her during SIP. The Faculty Guide will also mention the action
taken/suggested by him/her for those students whose progress in project is not satisfactory.
10. On completion of evaluation the Faculty Guide will submit a list of marks (not to be disclosed to students)
to HOI.
The executive summary provides an overview of the report’s essential information. The executive summary
needs to be in fewest words. Make sure it is self-sufficient and can be understood in isolation. Write this towards
the end of the project in about two hundred to three hundred words (i.e. not more than a page). Use active-voice
sentences with strong, enthusiastic, and proactive language. Executive summary should be written in simple,
short sentences intended to be read by an executive. The executive summary should briefly outline the below
mentioned points.
Points to be covered:
Student Information
Background
Methodology used
Recommendations