For FO's IPCR Form 1

INVESTIGATION REPORTS CASE CLASSIFICATIONS/MNPC/MPDP/CLIP

Dates submitted the Following
TIME QUALITY TIME
DOCKET NO. NAME OF PETITIONER DATES
Rating Case
No. of Rating for No. of for Classifica MNPC MPDP CLIP No. of
GIOR Days TIME Error/s Quality tion Days
Office Draft
Order Sent Rcvd Subm.
A. PSIR

B. FBCIR

C. CPIR
CPI-2019-
01-00001 Wilson Orosco 01/19/19 1/29/19 5 NE 5
5 NE 5
5 NE 5

Not applicable for FBCIR/CPIR/PPIR/PECIR/CPPIR/

CPECIR/MOTION/MANIFESTIONS

D. PPIR/PECIR

E. CPPIR/CPECIR

F. MOTION/MANIFESTATIONS
 EFFICIENCY (Investigation Reports) Total Total EFFICIENCY(CC/MPDP,MNPC,CLIP) Total
CC ANC % Rating Ave. Ave. Comp. Assigned % Rating Ave.
 for SPPOs, Sr.PPOs, PPOII, PPOs I

CASE CLASSIFICATIONS/MNPC/MPDP/CLIP For CPPO'S RATING

CC/MNPC/ INVESTIGATION REPORTS
TIME QUALITY MPDP/CLIP
TIME TIME QUALITY
Rating No. of Rating for
for Time Errors Quality Date No. of Date No. of Complaint Rating for
Approved Days Subm Days s QUALITY

1/29/19 NC 5
NC 5
NC 5

Not applicable for FBCIR/CPIR/PPIR/PECIR/CPPIR/

CPECIR/MOTION/MANIFESTIONS
105 Total Total Total Total
Ave. Ave. Ave. Ave.
For FO's IPCR Form 2
SUPERVISION-RELATED REPORTS
TIME
DATES
DOCKET NO. NAME OF CLIENTS No. of
Report Due Draft Subm. Days
NATURE OF REPORT
A. PROBATIONERS

PS-2016-10-00003

B. PAROLEES

C. JICL
-
D. FTMDO

EFFICIENCY ON SUPERVISION-RELATED REPORTS Total

Submitted Required % Rating Ave.
100%

SUPERVISION CASE NOTES

(Subject to PMT verification)
FOR FO'S RATING
EFFICIENCY ON SCN AVERAGE RATING

% Rating QUALITY TIME

Total Clients w/
SCN Total Clients Assigned
 for SPPOs, Sr.PPOs, PPOII, PPOs I
RTS
QUALITY FOR CPPO'S RATING

No. of Date
Rating Rating Rating
Errors Submitted

Total Total
Ave. Ave.

OTES
ation)
Average
FOR CPPO'S RATING Rating for
EFFICIENCY Time
Total No. Reviewed
% Rating
of Clients SCN
For FO's IPCR Form 3

MANDATORY TC SESSIONS
TIME QUALITY
DOCKET Name of Clients by Phase DATES Total Number of TC Sessions
NUMBER Number Rating
Completed of Rating Required Completed % Remarks
Started in TC
(Alphabetical Order: FN, N, MI) Phase Months
 EFFICIENCY Total Total
Total ACS Total Clients in TC % Rating Ave. Ave.
91 91 100% 5

REINFORCING ACTIVITIES SUMMARY OF RATINGS (TC)

EFFICIENCY QUALITY TIME ACTIVITIES Q1 E2 T3
NO. OF NO. OF
Dates 1. MTCS
NUMBER OF REINFORCING Rating CLIENTS CLIENTS Rating Rating
Report Due Report Sub
ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED ASSIGNED BENIFITED 2. Reinforcing Activities
TOTAL
1,612 5 91 91 5
1,612 5 91 91 5 Ave. NR
For FO's IPCR Form 4.a Sr.PPOs, PPOII, PPOs I
(WAR 2-A.2.1)
II-SUPERVISION
A. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
1. CONDUCT OF RJ PROCESSES

Name of RJ Process/es Date/ RJ Reason/s for Person/Institution RJ Outcome NR NR Remarks

Client Conducted Venue Planner RJ Process/es Involved Q1 T3
Total No. of clients in Need of RJ Process
Number of Clients who Underwent RJ Processes
Percentage
Rating for Efficiency
For FO's IPCR Form 4.b

II-SUPERVISION
A. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
2. Community Work Service & Payment of CL
NAME OF CLIENTS LIST/ENUMERATE
A. CWS Conducted
 for SPPOs, Sr.PPOs, PPOII, PPOs I
(WAR 2-A.2.2)
SUPERVISION
M IMPLEMENTATION
ork Service & Payment of CL
TOTAL NR for E2 NR for T3 REMARKS

A. TOTAL 100% -
Ave. 100% -
B. TOTAL - -
Ave. - -

TOTAL 100% -
Ave. NR A&B 100% -
For FO's IPCR Form 4.c

II-SUPERVISION
A. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
3. CONDUCT OF CIRCLE OF SUPPORT

Functional COS Not Functional Indicators Present TOTAL NR for E2

(Established/Sustained) COS 1 2 3 4

Total
Ave. NR

SUMMARY OF RATINGS (RJ)

ACTIVITIES Q1 E2 T3
1. Conduct RJ Process
2. CWS & Payment of CL No Rating -
3. Conduct of Circle of Support - - -
TOTAL
Ave. NR
 for SPPOs, Sr.PPOs, PPOII, PPOs I
(WAR 2-A.2.3)

To be rated by CPPO/OIC NR for NR for Remarks

Substantiality (5) Relevance (5) Q1 T3

Total
Ave. NR
`
SUMMARY OF RATINGS (TC & RJ)
ACTIVITIES Q1 E2 T4
1. TC Implementation
2. RJ Implementation
TOTAL
Ave. NR
For FO's IPCR Form 5 Sr.PPOs, PPOII, PPOs I

OUTPUT 3
MOBILIZATION OF VOLUNTEER PROBATION AIDES
QUALITY EFFICIENCY
TOTAL NO. OF % OF CLIENTS SUPERVISED BY RATING No. of Clients Supervised by Trained VPAs at
CLIENTS TRAINED VPAs 1:3 1:4

147 57% of active supervision 2 /

Rating for Quality 2 Total

Ave. Rating
3
R PROBATION AIDES
EFFICIENCY
ients Supervised by Trained VPAs at a Ratio of Remarks
1:5 1:6 Thereafter Rating

5 Ratio is 1.26
total # of clients
clients under
supervision

5
5
For FO's IPCR Form 6
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
A. Submitted IPCR
RATING PERIOD DATE SUBMITTED

QUALITY
ASSISTANCE
RATING
REPORTS PROVIDED
B. Jail Visitation

Total 5
Ave. 5

REPORTS QUALITY

C Information Drives
NO RATING

QUALITY
REPORTS

D Compliance to Court Orders

NO RATING
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received
Court Order for PSI received

EFFICIENCY
Total Required Reports Total Reports Submitted Rating

QUALITY
OUTPUTS ACCEPTABILITY RATING

E Other Outputs fr
1. Intervening T

2. Special Assignments/Designations
No. , s. 2019
dated Acceptable 5

ROSO No. , s. 2019

dated
Re: Acceptable 5

3. Other Outputs not included in 1 and 2

NONE

Total
 Ave.

EFFICIENCY
Total Required Reports Total Reports Submitted Rating

SUMMARY OF RATINGS RATINGS

QUALITY
A. IPCR No Rating
B. Jail Decongestion
C. Information Drives No Rating
D. Compliance to Court Orders No Rating
E. Other Outputs (a,b,c) -
TOTAL
AVE.
 for SPPOs, Sr.PPOs, PPOII, PPOs I
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS

DATE SUBMITTED TIMELINESS RATING

EFFICIENCY TIME

Rating
Total Jail Visits Conducted

NO RATING

Total 1
Ave. 1

EFFICIENCY
TIME
Rating
Total Number of Info Drives

NO RATING

Total 5
Ave. 5

TIME
DATES RATING
Report Due Report Subm

5
 Total
Ave.

TIME
DATES RATING
Report Due Report Subm

Total
 Ave.

TIME

No Rating
No Rating