You are on page 1of 17

Teachers Feedback

S.NO Items Parameters 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21


Strongly Agree 50% 50% 41% 25% 56%
Agree 41% 44% 56% 69% 41%
Curriculum and Syllabus
1 Neutral 9% 6% 3% 6% 3%
are need based
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 72% 66% 56% 66% 59%
The course outcomes Agree 28% 28% 41% 34% 38%
2 are well defined and Neutral 0% 6% 0% 0% 0%
clear Disagree 0% 0% 3% 0% 3%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Sufficient number of Strongly Agree 66% 66% 47% 63% 66%
relevant reading Agree 22% 31% 50% 34% 34%
3 materials and digital Neutral 6% 3% 0% 0% 0%
resources are available Disagree 6% 0% 3% 3% 0%
in the Library Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 66% 56% 47% 50% 72%
The course has good Agree 28% 41% 44% 47% 28%
4 balance between theory Neutral 6% 3% 6% 0% 0%
and application Disagree 0% 0% 3% 3% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
The course/syllabus of Strongly Agree 50% 63% 53% 47% 56%
this course increased Agree 50% 31% 47% 47% 41%
5 my knowledge and Neutral 0% 3% 0% 3% 0%
perspective in the Disagree 0% 3% 0% 3% 3%
subject area Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
I have the freedom to Strongly Agree 69% 63% 63% 62% 59%
propose, modify, Agree 19% 38% 34% 38% 31%
suggest and incorporate Neutral 6% 0% 3% 0% 0%
6
new topics in the
Disagree 6% 0% 0% 0% 6%
syllabus through proper
forum Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 3%
I have the freedom to Strongly Agree 63% 84% 81% 56% 69%
adopt new Agree 31% 16% 16% 44% 31%
7 techniques/education Neutral 6% 0% 3% 0% 0%
tools /strategies in Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Teaching Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
I am able to achieve the Strongly Agree 31% 72% 56% 34% 59%
minimum required Agree 66% 25% 38% 50% 38%
8 course outcome Neutral 3% 0% 3% 16% 3%
attainment level for my Disagree 0% 3% 3% 0% 0%
class Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 47% 59% 66% 50% 34%
I have taken sufficient Agree 44% 34% 31% 44% 56%
steps to provide
9 Neutral 0% 0% 0% 6% 6%
assistance to slow
learners Disagree 9% 6% 3% 0% 3%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 72% 66% 69% 41% 66%
I have contributed to the Agree 28% 34% 28% 59% 31%
10 curriculum and / or Neutral 0% 0% 0% 0% 3%
syllabus development Disagree 0% 0% 3% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
TNTEU Employers Feedback
S.N 2016-
O Items Parameters 17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Strongly Agree 43% 38% 40% 40% 45%
Agree 57% 55% 53% 51% 51%
The M.Ed curriculum currently
1 offered by TNTEU is relevant Neutral 0% 6% 6% 9% 2%
for employability. Disagree 0% 2% 2% 0% 2%
Strongly
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
The current M.Ed curriculum Strongly Agree 42% 40% 42% 40% 38%
has application – based Agree 51% 58% 53% 53% 57%
courses, which caters the Neutral 2% 2% 6% 8% 6%
2
needs of society in terms of Disagree 6% 0% 0% 0% 0%
knowledge, skills, attitude and Strongly
innovation. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 32% 13% 23% 34% 28%
The present M.Ed degree Agree 60% 75% 68% 55% 62%
programme is containing Neutral 6% 8% 8% 9% 8%
3
essential scholastic and non- Disagree 2% 4% 2% 2% 2%
scholastic activities. Strongly
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 49% 53% 43% 53% 47%
The present M.Ed degree
Agree 43% 47% 51% 42% 47%
programme promotes positive
4 attitudes among the Neutral 4% 0% 4% 4% 6%
prospective teacher Disagree 2% 0% 2% 2% 0%
educators. Strongly
Disagree 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 30% 30% 40% 25% 40%
The current M.Ed degree Agree 55% 58% 49% 51% 53%
programme is designed to Neutral 11% 11% 11% 13% 6%
5
empower prospective Disagree 2% 0% 0% 9% 0%
teachers educators. Strongly
Disagree 2% 0% 0% 2% 2%
The present M.Ed curriculum Strongly Agree 55% 40% 40% 30% 34%
is designed in such a way to Agree 42% 51% 45% 57% 58%
promote creativity among the
6 Neutral 0% 8% 9% 9% 6%
prospective teacher
educators. Disagree 0% 2% 4% 4% 2%
Strongly
Disagree 4% 0% 2% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 34% 32% 36% 47% 42%
The M.Ed curriculum of two- Agree 53% 57% 58% 51% 53%
years is adequate to develop Neutral 11% 9% 6% 0% 4%
7
necessary competencies for Disagree 2% 2% 0% 0% 0%
future teacher educators. Strongly
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 2% 2%
Strongly Agree 38% 40% 45% 13% 36%
Agree 58% 57% 51% 72% 58%
The present M.Ed curriculum
8 has a good balance between Neutral 2% 4% 4% 11% 6%
theory and practicum. Disagree 2% 0% 0% 4% 0%
Strongly
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 4% 26% 28% 49% 49%
The present M.Ed curriculum Agree 85% 58% 62% 47% 45%
is able to intellectually Neutral 8% 9% 8% 2% 6%
9
stimulate the would be Disagree 4% 6% 2% 2% 0%
teacher educators. Strongly
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 47% 36% 32% 26% 32%
The present M.Ed curriculum Agree 51% 57% 53% 57% 53%
helps to develop overall Neutral 0% 6% 11% 15% 13%
10
personality of the would be Disagree 2% 0% 4% 2% 0%
teacher educators. Strongly
Disagree 0% 2% 0% 0% 2%
Strongly Agree 40% 34% 34% 43% 43%
The present M.Ed curriculum Agree 53% 51% 53% 53% 45%
has provision for the hands
11 on experiences and field Neutral 8% 9% 8% 2% 8%
experiences to the future Disagree 0% 4% 2% 2% 4%
teacher educators Strongly
Disagree 0% 2% 4% 0% 0%
M.Phil Students Feedback
S.NO Items Parameters 2017 2018 2019 2020
Strongly Agree 0% 100% 33% 44%
Agree 100% 0% 67% 51%
Curriculum and Syllabi of the M.Phil
1 Neutral 0% 0% 0% 4%
Programme
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 100% 50% 17% 27%
Agree 0% 50% 83% 69%
2 Extent of syllabi covered in the Class Neutral 0% 0% 0% 4%
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 100% 50% 33% 49%
Agree 0% 50% 50% 47%
Course delivery by faculty
3 Neutral 0% 0% 0% 4%
members in the class
Disagree 0% 0% 17% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 0% 0% 33% 58%
Usage of teaching aids and ICT in Agree 0% 100% 50% 33%
4 the class by faculty to facilitate Neutral 100% 0% 17% 2%
learning Disagree 0% 0% 0% 7%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 100% 0% 50% 69%
Agree 0% 100% 50% 27%
Fairness in the assessment
5 Neutral 0% 0% 0% 4%
processes
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Timely announcement of Strongly Agree 100% 0% 50% 29%
6
examination results Agree 0% 100% 33% 62%
Neutral 0% 0% 0% 9%
Disagree 0% 0% 17% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 0% 0% 67% 38%
Agree 100% 50% 33% 53%
Opportunities in the University for
7 Neutral 0% 0% 0% 2%
Research Activities
Disagree 0% 50% 0% 4%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 2%
Strongly Agree 100% 50% 33% 64%
Opportunity for students to Agree 0% 50% 67% 36%
8 participate in internship, field visit Neutral 0% 0% 0% 0%
and other field based activities Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Opportunities for out of classroom Strongly Agree 0% 50% 0% 40%
learning (guest lectures, seminars, Agree 100% 50% 83% 51%
9 workshop, value programmes, Neutral 0% 0% 17% 7%
conferences, competitions, additions Disagree 0% 0% 0% 2%
etc)
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 0% 0% 33% 44%
Agree 100% 100% 67% 49%
Overall Learning Experience in the
10 Neutral 0% 0% 0% 4%
University
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 2%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
M.Phil Alumini Feedback
S.NO Items Parameters 2018 2019 2020 2021
Strongly Agree 100% 100% 83% 44%
The University curriculum and its Agree 0% 0% 17% 51%
contents are appropriate and
1 Neutral 0% 0% 0% 4%
relevant to develop professional
skills Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 0% 50% 50% 27%
The co-curricular activities Agree 100% 50% 33% 69%
2 organized by the University have Neutral 0% 0% 0% 4%
provided me real experiences Disagree 0% 0% 17% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
The organization of Internship Strongly Agree 100% 0% 50% 51%
Programmes in Teacher Education Agree 0% 50% 50% 47%
3 Institutions and Co-operative Neutral 0% 0% 0% 2%
Schools are helpful to demonstrate Disagree 0% 50% 0% 0%
our skills, talents, and creativity.
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 0% 100% 100% 53%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 100% 0% 0% 38%
4 University is helpful to choose Neutral 0% 0% 0% 4%
teaching profession. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 4%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 100% 100% 33% 67%
Agree 0% 0% 17% 24%
The University curriculum is
5 Neutral 0% 0% 17% 4%
updated, modern and competitive.
Disagree 0% 0% 33% 4%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 0% 50% 100% 29%
The University curriculum helps to Agree 100% 50% 0% 60%
6 develop essential leadership Neutral 0% 0% 0% 11%
qualities. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 100% 100% 33% 40%
The University curriculum Agree 0% 0% 50% 56%
encompasses the personal, social,
7 Neutral 0% 0% 17% 2%
national and internationally relevant
content. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 2%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 0% 50% 67% 62%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 0% 50% 33% 33%
8 University is a competitive and Neutral 100% 0% 0% 0%
challenging one. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 2%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 2%
Strongly Agree 100% 50% 67% 40%
Agree 0% 0% 33% 51%
The curriculum theory and practices
9 Neutral 0% 0% 0% 7%
are properly aligned and balanced.
Disagree 0% 50% 0% 2%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 100% 50% 50% 44%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 0% 0% 33% 49%
University is useful to solve
10 Neutral 0% 50% 0% 4%
personal and community related
problems. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 17% 2%
Strongly Agree 100% 50% 33% 47%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 0% 50% 67% 42%
11 University is value loaded and Neutral 0% 0% 0% 11%
student – centric. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 0% 100% 50% 42%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 100% 0% 50% 49%
12 University is continuous, logical and Neutral 0% 0% 0% 7%
interwoven. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 2%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 100% 50% 50% 49%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 0% 50% 33% 47%
13 University is highly motivating and Neutral 0% 0% 17% 2%
interesting one. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 2%
Strongly Agree 100% 50% 50% 47%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 0% 0% 50% 49%
14 University is an exhaustive and Neutral 0% 0% 0% 2%
meaningful one. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 50% 0% 2%
Strongly Agree 0% 50% 50% 49%
The curriculum offered by the
Agree 100% 50% 17% 51%
15 University is flexible to choose the
option of study by the students. Neutral 0% 0% 17% 0%
Disagree 0% 0% 17% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%

Ph.D Students Feedback


S.NO Items Parameters 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Strongly Agree 0% 32% 41% 30% 27%
Agree 100% 63% 53% 69% 55%
Curriculum and Syllabi of the PhD
1 Neutral 0% 0% 6% 2% 15%
Programme
Disagree 0% 5% 0% 0% 3%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 0% 21% 41% 30% 3%
Agree 57% 68% 53% 56% 64%
2 Extent of syllabi covered in the Class Neutral 29% 11% 0% 13% 30%
Disagree 14% 0% 6% 2% 3%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 14% 21% 35% 21% 27%
Agree 57% 74% 65% 56% 58%
Course delivery by faculty members
3 Neutral 29% 5% 0% 23% 15%
in the class
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 43% 16% 35% 54% 52%
Agree 57% 47% 53% 39% 48%
Usage of teaching aids and ICT in the
4 Neutral 0% 32% 6% 7% 0%
class by faculty to facilitate learning
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 5% 6% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 57% 21% 47% 23% 30%
Agree 43% 58% 53% 62% 64%
Fairness in the assessment
5 Neutral 0% 21% 0% 11% 6%
processes
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Strongly Agree 29% 63% 41% 44% 39%
Timely announcement of examination Agree 57% 32% 53% 52% 52%
6
results Neutral 0% 5% 0% 3% 6%
Disagree 14% 0% 0% 0% 3%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 6% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 43% 58% 35% 43% 36%
Agree 57% 42% 59% 52% 61%
Opportunities in the University for
7 Neutral 0% 0% 6% 5% 0%
Research Activities
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 3%
Strongly Agree 43% 47% 47% 30% 42%
Opportunity for students to Agree 57% 42% 53% 66% 55%
8 participate in internship, field visit Neutral 0% 5% 0% 5% 3%
and other field based activities Disagree 0% 5% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Opportunities for out of classroom Strongly Agree 57% 37% 53% 31% 24%
learning (guest lectures, seminars, Agree 43% 58% 47% 56% 64%
9 workshop, value programmes, Neutral 0% 5% 0% 11% 12%
conferences, competitions, additions Disagree 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%
etc)
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 0% 42% 18% 13% 36%
Agree 100% 47% 65% 80% 58%
Overall Learning Experience in the
10 Neutral 0% 5% 12% 7% 3%
University
Disagree 0% 5% 6% 0% 3%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Ph.D Alumini Feedback


S.NO Items Parameters 2018 2019 2020 2021
The University curriculum and its Strongly Agree 57% 61% 64% 61%
1
contents are appropriate and Agree 43% 39% 36% 39%
Neutral 0% 0% 0% 0%
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
relevant to develop professional
skills Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 71% 50% 50% 50%
The co-curricular activities Agree 29% 50% 50% 50%
2 organized by the University have Neutral 0% 0% 0% 0%
provided me real experiences Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
The organization of Internship Strongly Agree 29% 28% 36% 50%
Programmes in Teacher Education Agree 43% 67% 57% 50%
3 Institutions and Co-operative Neutral 14% 0% 0% 0%
Schools are helpful to demonstrate Disagree 14% 0% 7% 0%
our skills, talents, and creativity.
Strongly Disagree 0% 6% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 43% 78% 29% 50%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 57% 17% 71% 33%
4 University is helpful to choose Neutral 0% 6% 0% 11%
teaching profession. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 6%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 43% 67% 43% 44%
Agree 43% 28% 50% 50%
The University curriculum is
5 Neutral 14% 6% 7% 6%
updated, modern and competitive.
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 43% 50% 43% 44%
The University curriculum helps to Agree 57% 44% 50% 50%
6 develop essential leadership Neutral 0% 6% 7% 0%
qualities. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 6%
7 The University curriculum Strongly Agree 71% 61% 50% 44%
Agree 14% 33% 50% 44%
encompasses the personal, social,
Neutral 0% 0% 0% 11%
national and internationally relevant
content. Disagree 14% 6% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 43% 44% 43% 50%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 57% 44% 50% 50%
8 University is a competitive and Neutral 0% 6% 7% 0%
challenging one. Disagree 0% 6% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 57% 39% 50% 44%
Agree 43% 56% 43% 39%
The curriculum theory and practices
9 Neutral 0% 6% 7% 11%
are properly aligned and balanced.
Disagree 0% 0% 0% 6%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 43% 61% 57% 61%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 57% 28% 36% 39%
University is useful to solve
10 Neutral 0% 11% 0% 0%
personal and community related
problems. Disagree 0% 0% 7% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 71% 56% 43% 33%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 29% 39% 50% 56%
11 University is value loaded and Neutral 0% 6% 7% 11%
student – centric. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 43% 67% 50% 50%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 43% 28% 50% 50%
12 University is continuous, logical and Neutral 14% 6% 0% 0%
interwoven. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 57% 44% 14% 44%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 29% 44% 79% 50%
13 University is highly motivating and Neutral 14% 6% 7% 0%
interesting one. Disagree 0% 6% 0% 6%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 29% 72% 57% 33%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 57% 22% 43% 50%
14 University is an exhaustive and Neutral 14% 6% 0% 17%
meaningful one. Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 0%
Strongly Agree 43% 56% 36% 44%
The curriculum offered by the Agree 29% 33% 57% 39%
15 University is flexible to choose the Neutral 29% 6% 7% 11%
option of study by the students. Disagree 0% 6% 0% 0%
Strongly Disagree 0% 0% 0% 6%

You might also like