Title of Innovative Project: CONTACTLESS ATTENDANCE USING GOOGLE SHEET AND QR

(QUICK RESPONSE) CODE

Name of Project Lead/Team: CONNECT WITH SAM / EHLEE S. TUBALINAL
School Phone Number Years in District
Project Description
Project Proposal
While they may look simple QR codes are capable of storing lots of data. But no

matter how much response they contain when scanned, the QR code should allow

the user to access –hence why it’s called a Quick Response code. A QR code is a

type of barcode that can be read by a digital device and stores information as a

series of pixel in a square-shaped grid; it is frequently used to track information.

The information instantly transform the distribution and retrieval of modules to

parents to prevent the spread of viruses that could put us at risk.

To get the modules at school they just need to scan the QR codes given by the

teacher and get the modules placed on the table and they can leave without

having to sign the paper and also without having to use a ball pen to sign. It will

be seen in the teacher’s mobile phone the day and time of their acquisition and

when everyone has obtained the modules can be seen in the software installed on

the teacher's mobile phone and the activities that took place in the raw of

distribution.

Attach the Innovative Project Application (Form 2) to this Innovative Project Proposal.

©Unified School District of Marshfield 1

 Innovative Program
Form 2
Project Application

Title of Innovative Project:

Name of Project Lead /Team:
School Phone Number
Use the Action Research Planning Tool (Appendix A) and the Innovative Project Evaluation Rubric
(Form 4) to guide the application process.

I. Define the Project

Problem Statement

Write a short problem statement:

II. Analyze the Situation

Collect and share baseline data establishing the existence of the problem and justifying your
Innovative Project to address the student learning issue.

III. Generate Hypothesis

Conduct Literature Review

Write a three to five paragraph summary of current research and best practice instructional
strategies and/or approaches proposed to justify the significance of your problem to
student learning, and your rationale for addressing the problem through this innovative
project. Include a reference list identifying published research used to ground your
proposal.

©Unified School District of Marshfield 2

IV. Test proposed Innovative Project

A. Outline the specific proposed plan of action you will implement to test the solution you have
selected to pilot to address your identified problem:

Goal of the Project:

Outcome: What will be achieved in this study.
Action Steps: Who When Resources

B. Identify the data collection process you will use to measure and evaluate the success of
your innovative project. Identify 3-5 specific indicators of success you will monitor.

Indicator/Data to be Collected Technology/Format Time(s) of Collection

Date
(Signature)

©Unified School District of Marshfield 3

 Innovative Program
Form 3
Data Tracking Forms

Name of Mentor
Name of New Teacher
School Phone Number

I. Test Innovative Project

Implement your prosed solution for several months and collect data on indicators
identified and outlined in the Data Collection Plan submitted with your Innovative Project
Application (Form 2).

C. Data Collection Tools

1. Create an excel document or other electronic data collection tool and document results
as measure by the data indicators identified in the Innovative Project application. Collect
results throughout your project according to the timeline set in your Data Collection Plan.

AND

2. Maintain a journal of your experiences while testing your Innovative Project.

Sample Journal – This will be an expandable form to complete weekly throughout project
timeline.

Date: Notes
Relationships: How student
responded.
Communications: Discussions with
colleagues.
Patterns of work and organization:
Can project tasks be completed within
the current structure and
organization.
Difficulties encountered and solutions
tried.
Progress update: How the project and
proposed action plan are working.
Modifications needed

©Unified School District of Marshfield 4

 Innovative Program
Form 3
Project Evaluation Report

Title of Innovative Project:

Name of Project Lead /Team:
School Phone Number

V. Capture and Report Lessons Learned

Write an Innovative Project Evaluation Report. Include the elements outlined below in your
report. Use the Innovative Project Evaluation Rubric to guide your evaluation.

 Evaluation Report
Project Overview
 Problem statement and relevancy of project to student learning
 Project goal
 Desired project outcome(s)
Review Data Collection Plan
 Review identified indicators and timeline
 Assess your level of follow-through on data collection plan
Share Results (based on data collected during the Innovative Project)
 State findings from data collection - Use visuals (graphs, charts etc.)
and provide a brief narrative summarizing results of each visual.
 Address level of attainment of project goal and desired project
outcome(s)
 Assess level of attainment of project goal
 Summarize key findings from weekly journal logs.
Summarize Project Results
 Assess effectiveness of actions taken in your action plan.
 Celebrate progress
 Share challenges
 Make recommendations

Submit your Innovative Project Evaluation Report and this signed checklist to the
Superintendent.

Date
(Teacher Signature)

©Unified School District of Marshfield 5

 Innovative Program
Form 5
Project Development and Evaluation Rubric

Rubric for Innovative Project Development and Evaluation

©Unified School District of Marshfield 6

 Innovative Program
Form 6
Project Application Appraisal

Name of Project: ________________________________________________ Date ________________________

Circle the remarks in each column indicating your rating for each category and enter a
score in the Project Element column after considering each category.

Ratings to Standard
Innovative
Nearly Meets Does Not
Project Element Exceeds (6-7) Meets (4-5)
(2-3) Meet (0-1)
   
Action Plan
Report

_________
Score

Project Proposal Score ___________________

A minimum of ____(add a number here______points is required or approval.

This proposal is: Approved Not Approved

Date
(Superintendent’s Signature)

7
 Form 6
Rubric for Innovative Project Proposal
Appraisal

Name of Project: ________________________________________________ Date ________________________

Circle the remarks in each column indicating your rating for each category and enter a score in the Project Element column
after considering each category.

Part One – Project Proposal

Innovative Project Ratings to Standard
Element Exceeds (6-7) Meets (4-5) Nearly Meets (2-3) Does Not Meet (0-1)
 Clear focus, and an  There is a clear focus,  The area of focus  There is no clear
extremely and a developed is too broad or focus for the
comprehensive explanation of the narrow. Does not project. No case
explanation of the problem, a connection clearly make a has been made that
problem, the to student learning has strong connection a problem exists.
connection to been made and a to student No connection to
student learning and reasonable response is learning or the student learning is
proposes a proposed. proposed evident. An under-
purposeful and  Innovative Project is response is not developed
Problem Statement reasonable response. aligned to a School clearly linked to response is
 Innovative Project is Improvement goal the problem. proposed.
___________ tightly aligned to a and/or a Board  Innovative  Innovative Project
Score School Improvement Strategic Priority. Project is is not aligned to a
goal and a Board  The introduction states somewhat School
Strategic Priority. the problem, provides a aligned to a Improvement goal
 The introduction is context for the study School or a Board
engaging, states the and previews the Improvement Strategic Priority.
problem, provides a structure of the goal.  No clear intro., or
context for the study Innovative Project.  The introduction problem statement
and previews the states problem, or structure of the
project’s structure. but does not Innovative Project.
8
provide a
context
for the study.

9
Innovative Project Ratings to Standard
Element Exceeds (6-7) Meets (4-5) Nearly Meets (2-3) Does Not Meet (0-1)
 Comprehensive  Study is connected to  Makes an attempt  Little or no
review of the the existing research, to connect the attempt to connect
current, relevant and use of mostly study to existing the study to
literature to both the relevant and recent research, however existing research.
problem statement literature related to the multiple sources  There are virtually
and the proposed problem statement and cited do not relate no sources that are
innovation is proposed innovation. to the problem or professionally
Literature Review presented.  Although most of the proposed reliable. The
 Five or more references are innovation. reader seriously
___________ references are professionally  Most of the doubts the value of
Score primarily peer- legitimate (minimum of references are the material and
reviewed 3), a few are from sources stops reading.
professional journals questionable (e.g. trade that are not peer-
or other approved books, internet sources, reviewed and
sources (e.g. gov’t. popular magazines...). have uncertain
documents). Reader The reader is uncertain reliability. The
is confident and of the reliability of reader doubts the
trusts the report. some of the sources. report’s accuracy.
 Multiple data  Multiple data  Multiple data  Few data sources
sources are sources are sources are are identified.
identified and there identified. identified.  Data sources do
is an attempt to  Data sources match the  Data does not not match the
triangulate data. problem statement and match the problem statement
Plan for Data
 Data sources project innovation. problem stmt. or or innovation.
Collection
match the problem  Data collection plan is innovation.  Data collection
statement and complete and doable in  Data collection plan is insufficient.
___________
project innovation. 6-9 months. plan presented
Score
 Data collection plan needs
is comprehensive modifications to
and doable in 6-9 complete or
months. make
doable in 6-9

10
 months.
Innovative Project Ratings to Standard
Element Exceeds (6-7) Meets (4-5) Nearly Meets (2-3) Does Not Meet (0-1)
 Action is insightfully  Action is outlined in  Several action  Action steps are
outlined in light of light of relevant steps are not outlined in
several relevant educational research & outlined in light light of relevant
educational research best practice. relevant educational
& best practice  The proposed educational research & best
elements. innovation is linked to research & best practice. Action
 The proposed a student learning practice. steps have been
innovation is goal and tentatively  The proposed missed.
directly linked to a supported in research. innovation is  The proposed
student learning  Some awareness of loosely linked to innovation might
goal and response is culture and context is a student learning be linked to
Proposed Action Plan grounded in indicated in the action goal and student learning
research. plan. represented in but the connection
___________  High level of  Clear anticipation of some research. is not clear in
Score awareness of culture resources and potential  Little awareness research.
and context is given challenges are of culture and  Little awareness of
to the action plan. addressed. context is culture and context
 Clear anticipation of indicated in the is indicated in the
resources and action plan. action plan.
potential challenges  Some anticipation  Some needed
are addressed. of resources and resources and/or
potential potential
challenges are challenges have
addressed. been missed.

This concludes the portion of the rubric for the Innovative Project Proposal

Total Score _____________________ A minimum of ____(#) points required. This proposal is: Approved Not Approved

11
 Date
Superintendent’s Signature

12
 Innovative Program
Form 7
Project Evaluation Report Appraisal

Name of Project: ________________________________________________ Date ________________________

Circle the remarks in each column indicating your rating for each category and enter a
score in the Project Element column after considering each category.

©Unified School District of Marshfield

 Form 7
Rubric for Innovative Project Evaluation Report Appraisal

Name of Project ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Date ____________________

Part Two – Project Evaluation

Innovative Project Ratings to Standard
Element Exceeds (6-7) Meets (4-5) Nearly Meets (2-3) Does Not Meet (0-1)
 Action plan outlined was  Action plan outlined was  Action plan outlined  Action plan outlined
carried out completely. mostly carried out (80% or was partly carried was not completed.
 Any modifications made more). out (more than 50%).  Significant
to the action plan were  Any modifications made to  Modifications made modifications were
done to make the project the action plan were done to to the action plan made to the action
successful in the context make the project successful were not done to plan without consult of
and culture of the school in the context and culture of make the project leadership.
and were clearly the school and demonstrate successful in the  No excel spreadsheet
grounded in research reasonable judgment. context and culture or other data tool was
and sound judgment.  A comprehensive excel of the school. used to record data on
 A comprehensive excel spreadsheet or other data  An excel spreadsheet identified indicators.
spreadsheet or other data tool was used to record data or other data tool  A journal with some
Action Plan tool was used to record on most indicators was used to record reflection was
data on all indicators throughout the project (80% data on some maintained
throughout the project. or more). indicators (50% or sporadically during the
 A detailed journal with  A journal with some more). project.
significant reflection reflection was  A journal was  Resource needs and
was maintained maintained throughout maintained with potential challenges
throughout the project. the project. little detail and/or stopped the project
 Resource needs and  Resource needs and little reflection. from moving
potential challenges potential challenges  Some resource forward.
were addressed as were addressed as needs and potential
needed. needed. challenges were not
addressed.

24
 Innovative Project Ratings to Standard
Element Exceeds (6-7) Meets (4-5) Nearly Meets (2-3) Does Not Meet (0-1)
 Ideas are arranged  The ideas are arranged  In general, the writing  The writing is not
logically to fully logically to address is arranged logically logically organized
address the problem the problem statement and partially addresses and does not address
statement and desired and desired outcomes the problem statement the problem statement
outcomes of the of the innovation. and desired outcomes of and/or desired
innovation.  Ideas flow and are the innovation. outcomes.
 Ideas flow smoothly usually linked to  Occasionally ideas  Frequently, ideas fail
from one to another each other. fail to make sense or to make sense together.
Data Report and are clearly linked  Visuals and clear short flow with each other  Minimal visuals are
to each other. narratives are used to in the report. used and some results
 Extremely clear use of explain the results.  Some visuals and are not conveyed in
visuals and clear short  For the most part, short narratives are the report.
narratives are used to the reader can follow used to explain results.  The reader cannot
explain results. the line of reasoning.  The reader is fairly identify a line of
 The reader can follow clear about what writer reasoning and loses
the line of reasoning. intends to convey. interest.

 Richly describes  Describes relevant  Results from the data  Results are poorly
relevant information information from collection process described & lack
from data collection data collection shared but relevancy relevancy to the
process. process. to the project unclear. project.
 Presentation of ideas is  Presentation of ideas  Presentation of ideas  Presentation of ideas
from an informative is from an informative is from an informative is from an informative
source (e.g., interview, source (e.g., interview, source (e.g., interview, source (e.g., interview,
survey, or observation survey, or observation survey, or observation survey, or observation
of teacher, parent, of teacher, parent, of teacher, parent, of teacher, parent,
student, administrator) student, administrator) student, administrator) student, administrator)
Conclusions and and comprehensively and summarizes the but does not fully but not connected to
Recommendations summarizes the Innovative Project. summarize the project. the project.
Innovative Project.  Analysis and  Sufficient analysis is  Minimal analysis is
 Analysis and interpretation match given but given of results
interpretation match the data presented. interpretation does not presented.
the data presented.  Conclusions are clearly match data presented.  Conclusions and
 Recommendations are presented.  Conclusions and recommendations are
clear, reasonable and  Some recommendations are minimal and/or are not
can be backed by the recommendations are presented yet are based on the results of
results of the made and are clearly incomplete and/or not the project.
Innovative Project. based on the results of necessarily based on
the Innovative Project. the results shared.

25
Add this to the bottom of the page…
Project Evaluation Report Appraisal Score: _____________________ A minimum of ____(#)_____points is required or approval.

This Evaluation Report is: Sufficient Not Sufficient

Date
(Superintendent’s Signature

26