Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sahupuram
“Manufacturers of Chemicals that make industries hum”
T. Chandru,
Sr. GM (Electrical)
CARTOGRAPHIC LOCATION OF
SAHUPURAM
SAHUPURAM WORKS
SALT : 1,50,000 TPA CAUSTIC SODA : 1,00,000 TPA LIQUID CHLORINE : 36,000 TPA
Co-Gen 58.27 MW Power Plant SYNTHETIC RUTILE: 48,000 TPA PVC RESIN : 90,000 TPA
OVERVIEW
- Past and Present System
of Loading in
Rectifier Transformer No. 1
OVERVIEW OF THE PAST SYSTEM
72KA Totalizer
DC Bus
Mercury Cell
Mercury Cell
Mercury Cell
Mercury Cell
Mercury Cell
Mercury Cell
Mercury Cell
72KA / 300 V
No-70
No-72
No-71
No-3
No-4
No-2
No-1
RT – 1 LOADING PATTERN
DURING MERCURY CELL OPERATION 1996 – 2007
500 40
Rated AC Current 450 Amps
35
400
Av. AC Current during Mercury Cell Operations 30
300 25
320 320 320 325 325 325 325 325 325 330 330
20
Rated DC Load Current during Mercury Cell – 20
200 15
15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
Av. DC Load Current during Mercury Cell Operation 10
100
5
0 0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Till
Oct
2007
OVERVIEW OF THE PAST SYSTEM
RT – 1 LOADING PATTERN
DURING MERCURY CELL OPERATION (1996 – 2007)
100%
81.0% 80.0% 81.0% 81.0% 81.0%
Percentage loading
77.0% 76.0%
80%
82.0% 79.0% 82.0% 80.0%
78.0%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Till
Oct
2007
OVERVIEW OF THE PRESENT SYSTEM
Membrane Cell From November 2007
11KV Bus
Same
Rectifier
RT- RT- RT- 8.08 RT-
System 8.08 8.08 8.08
5th 7th 11th
MVA 1 MVA 2 MVA 3 MVA 4
used for HFB HFB HFB
Membrane
Operation 6-Pulse 6-Pulse 6-Pulse 6-Pulse
Thyrister Thyrister Thyrister Thyrister
Rectifier-1 Rectifier-2 Rectifier-3 Rectifier-4
(20KA / (20KA / (20KA / (20KA /
345 V DC) 345 V DC) 345 V DC) 345 V DC)
20KA 20KA 20KA
80KA Totalizer
80KA / 345 V DC Bus
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Till Mar
2012
10
WHAT HAS HAPPENED
TO RT -1
What Has Happened to RT -1
19.03.12
Oil Sample collected and send to NABL Accredited Lab
DAY 3
at Chennai for Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA).
24.03.12
DAY 8
What Has Happened to RT -1
12.04.12
DAY 27
What Has Happened to RT -1
28.05.12
DAY 73
03.06.12
Transformer re-commissioned.
DAY 81
Determine the
Causes
20
Determine the Causes
Loading of RT – 1 increased to continuous Full Load Operation
After 13 Years of Service with Membrane Technology
100%
95.8% 96.4%
Percentage loading
96.0%
91.1%
82.0% 82.0%
85.6%
80.0%
79.0%
80% 77.0%
76.0% 81.0%
81.0% 80.0% 81.0% 81.0%
78.0%
60%
21
Determine the Causes
No of Tripping at full load for Load Shedding & Switching
Surges per year increased in RT-1 from 2008
60
52
49 47
50 45
40
40 35 34 32
32 31 30 28 32 29
30
21
20
10
5
0
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 14th
Mar
2012
*As the value exceeds this limit, sample frequency should be increased with consideration given to
planned outage in near term for further evaluation.
** As value exceeds this limit, removal of transformer from service should be considered
This table is derived from information provided within ANSI/IEEE c57.104
Determine the Causes
Analysis of Furon Compounds carried out on 30.03.2011
One Year before the failure of RT - 1
Sl.
RT 1 TESTS on 30.03.2011 Sample TEST METHOD TEST VALUE
No
1 ANALYSIS OF FURANIC COMPOUNDS
a 5 Hydroxymethyl-2 furfural, mg/kg 0
b 2-Furfury Alcohol, mg/kgl 0
c 2-Furfural, mg/kg 40
IEC-1198-1993
d 2-Acetylfuran, mg/kg 0
e 5-Methyl-2-furfural, mg/kg 0
Total Furan content in PPB 40
Note : Furan content between 0 to 100 PPB in oil, indicates Normal Transformer.
Total Furan in PPB` Condition
0-100 Normal
101 - 250 Questionable
251 - 1000 Deteriorated
1001 - 2500 Low reliability
>2500 Rewind / Replace solid insulation
Determine the Causes
DGA Analysis after the failure of RT - 1
Key Gas Concentration (in ppm)
Our Oil
Gas Description sample
Normal Action
results Potential fault type
Limits * Limits **
during
failure
Hydrogen H2 150 1000 1203 Corona, Arcing
Methane CH4 25 80 4519 Sparking
Acetylene C2H2 15 70 0 Arcing
Ethylene C2H4 20 150 3983 Severe Overheating
Doerenenberg Ratios
R1 - Methane/Hydrogen CH4 / H2 R1 > 1.0 R1 < 0.1 0.1 < R1 <1.0
R2 - Acetylene/Ethylene C2H2/ C2H4 R2 < 0.75 R3 < 0.3 0.75 < R2
R3 - Acetylene/Methane C2H2/ CH4 R3 < 0.3 0.4 < R4 0.3 < R3
R4 - Ethane / Acetylene C2H6/ C2H2 R4 < 0.4 R4 < 0.4
Rogers Ratios
R1 - Methane/Hydrogen CH4 / H2 1.0 < R1 R1 > 1.0 1.0 < R1 R1 < 0.1 0.1 < R1 <1.0
R2 - Acetylene/Ethylene C2H2/ C2H4 R2 < 0.1 R2 < 0.1 R2 < 0.1 R2 < 0.1 1.0 < R2 <3.0
RS - Ethylene / Ethane C2H4/ C2H6 1.0 < R1 < 3.0 1.0 < RS<3.0 3.0 < RS RS < 1.0 3.0 < RS
LEGEND
Duval‟s Triangle Model PD – Partial Discharge
T1 = Thermal Fault Less than 300° C
T2 = Thermal Fault Less than 300° C and 700 ° C .
T1 = Thermal Fault greater than 700° C
D1 = Low Energy Discharge (Sparking)
D2 = High Energy Discharge (Arcing)
DT = Mix of Thermal and Electrical Faults.
T2
Our Values
%CH4 - 53%
% C2H2 - 0
D1
% C2H4 - 47%
Our values plotted
in triangle
From Duval‟s Triangle our values indicated Low energy discharge
and Thermal fault between 300 – 700 degree C.
Determine the Causes
Bucholtz
Alarm
Gas
Produced
Local heating
of Oil
34
Evaluate the Solutions
90.0%
RT – 1
88.0% 88.0%
Failure 86.0% 86.0%
83.8%
86.0% 86.0% 86.0%
80.0% 82.0%
80.0%
75.0% 74.0%
73.0%
72.0%
68.5%
60.0%
Evaluate the Solutions
% Loading of transformer
75% 74% 80%
72% 73%
70%
800 Normal Limit <500 69%
Action Limit > 1000 PPM 60%
600 50%
40%
927
916
853
848
400
30%
595
569
499
485
20%
397
390
200
363
359
339
319
301
299
293
10%
-
- 0%
36
Evaluate the Solutions
14,000
Carbon di oxide content in PPM in RT 1 100%
% Loading of transformer
75% 74% 80%
72% 73%
CO2 content in PPM
69%
10,000 transformer
70%
Normal Limit <10000
Action Limit > 15000 PPM 60%
4,000 30%
5,151
5,134
4,969
20%
4,303
3,666
2,000
3,056
3,018
2,489
2,072
2,016
1,658
1,899
1,875
10%
559
716
986
-
-
-
- 0%
37
Evaluate the Solutions
CO2 / CO Gas ratio is an indicator of thermal decomposition of Cellulose.
If ratio is > 11 or < 3 along with increase in other gases methane, ethane,
acetylene indicate excessive oil degradation 100%
14 88%
90%
88%
86% 86% 86%
84%
90%
80%
82% 86% 86%
12 Oil Filtration done after repairing the
75% 74%
80%
72% 73%
69%
70%
10
Normal Zone for CO2 / CO 60%
8
50%
6 40%
6.2 30%
5.1
5.2
4
5.5
5.4
5.5
4.7
6.4
6.1
6.1
20%
5.1
5.0
2.2
2.7
10%
1.9
2.2
-
-
- 0%
38
Evaluate the Solutions
70
60
transformer
50
4
-
-
-
RT-1 Norms
39
Evaluate the Solutions
40
Ethane content in PPM
30
transformer
25
1
3
-
0
1
0
RT-1 Norms
40
Evaluate the Solutions
160
Ethylene content in PPM
120
100
transformer
27
27
20
20
17
17
12
14
1
5
-
RT-1 Norms
41
Evaluate the Solutions
Acetylene content in PPM
80
Not Detectable
70
50 transformer
30
Normal Limit < 15 PPM
Action Limit > 70 PPM
20
10
Oil
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
RT-1 Norms
42
Evaluate the Solutions
Analysis of Furon Compounds carried out on 06.06.2013
after re-commissioning of RT - 1
Sl.
RT 1 TESTS on 06.06.2013 Sample TEST METHOD TEST VALUE
No
1 ANALYSIS OF FURANIC COMPOUNDS
a 5 Hydroxymethyl-2 furfural, mg/kg 21.962
b 2-Furfury Alcohol, mg/kgl 0.917
c 2-Furfural, mg/kg 4.916
IEC-1198-1993
d 2-Acetylfuran, mg/kg 38.171
e 5-Methyl-2-furfural, mg/kg 0.721
Total Furan content in PPB 66.687
Note : Furan content between 0 to 100 PPB in oil, indicates Normal Transformer.
1,000
3,000
7,000
9,000
5,000
13,000
11,051 11,534
11,797
12,318 12,104
12,692
12,793 12,888
12,677
RT-2
– 2, 3 & 4 in June 2012
6,974 7,202
8,002
5,959 5,254
RT-3
6,158
4,795 4,669
4,846
RT-4
3,810 4,927
5,306
4,743 4,952
4,359
Action Limit > 15000 PPM
Norms
Normal Limit < 10000 PPM
Carbon Dioxide content in PPM
7,075 8,263
7,677
Evaluate the Solutions
8,301 9,350
10,204
Oil Filtration done in
6,198 5,549
5,250 Rect. Transformers
– 2, 3 & 4 in Feb 2013
6,222 5,503
5,613
Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13
44
200
2,200
4,200
6,200
8,200
10,200
6,222 5,503
12,200
5,613
6,648 5,922
5,683
4,051
3,308
3,786
RT-2
5,047
5,013
4,879
5,013
6,695
6,351
RT-3
Rect. Transformers
4,056
– 2, 3 & 4 in Aug 2013
642
1,302
4,766
RT-4
Carbon Dioxide content in PPM
Evaluate the Solutions
Norms
Action Limit > 15000 PPM
Normal Limit < 10000 PPM
45
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,188
1,800
1,383
93%
1,211
1,205
1,439
92%
1,404
1,213
1,455
90%
1,711
338
RT-2
273 Oil Filtration done in all Rect.
80%
282 Transformers 2, 3 & 4
226
147
75%
237
401
418
72%
263
290
345
73%
263
RT-3
275
441
74%
333
417
Action Limit > 1000 PPM
Normal Limit < 500 PPM
82% 561
416
689
736
88%
760
971
Carbon Monoxide content in PPM
1,027
90%
1,141
RT-4
416
448 Oil Filtration done in Rect.
88%
522
Preventive Action to avoid such incidences in future
46
Evaluate the Solutions
1,200
Carbon Monoxide content in PPM
Oil Filtration done in Rect.
1,000
Transformer-2, 3 & 4
1,000
Normal Limit < 500 PPM
822
Action Limit > 1000 PPM
800
680
645
642
641
612
581
576
548
544
600
522
528
348
400
621
615
599
590
496
172
200 205
184
-
Mar.13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14
20
19
18
18
18
16
20
11
11
8
10
7
6
6
6
6
5
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
-
-
-
-
-
Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13
6
4
4
4
4
3
3
2
2
2
1
-
-
35
30
25
20
15 Normal Limit < 10 PPM
Action Limit > 35 PPM
10
7
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
-
40
Ethane content in PPM
35
30
25
20
15 Normal Limit < 10 PPM
Action Limit > 35 PPM
10
4
4
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
160
Ethylene content in PPM
140
120
100
80
60 Normal Limit < 20 PPM
Action Limit > 150 PPM
40
15
14
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
20
11
11
10
9
8
8
9
7
6
6
5
5
5
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
1
-
16
15
13
13
13
20
11
10
8
7
6
5
4
5
3
2
-
60
50
40
30
Normal Limit < 15 PPM
Action Limit > 70 PPM
20
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
60
50
20
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
the transformer
Formulate Recommendations
62