2022 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (O

Name of Employee: CHERRY MAE L. LIMBACO-REYES, Ph.D. CESO V

Position: Schools Division Superintendent
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Cagayan de Oro City
Rating Period: January - December 2022
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Key Result Key Performance Indicat
Weight
Areas (KRAs) Objectives
per KRA QUALITY
1. Strategic 1.1 Ensured delivery of quality 5% 5 100% of programs and initiatives are
Management and accessible basic education incoporated in the DEDP and supported with
and through formulation of evidence- approved Program Plans/Work and Financial
Operations based and collaboratively Plans
planned programs and initiatives
4 85-99% of programs and initiatives are
translated in the Division incoporated in the DEDP and supported with
Education Development Plan approved Program Plans/Work and Financial
(DEDP) and BE-LCP.
Plans
3 75-84% of programs and initiatives are
incoporated in the DEDP and supported with
approved Program Plans/Work and Financial
Plans
2 65-74% of programs and initiatives are
incoporated in the DEDP and supported with
approved Program Plans/Work and Financial
Plans
1 50-64% of programs and initiatives are
incoporated in the DEDP and supported with
approved Program Plans/Work and Financial
Plans

1.2 Intensified the monitoring 3% 5 Monitored and evaluated 100% of the

and evaluation of the Division Comprehensive Strategic Plans in the DEDP
Education Development Plan based on the Progress Monitoring Report
(DEDP) implementation. (DMEA/SMEA)
4 Monitored and evaluated 85-99% of the
Comprehensive Strategic Plans in the DEDP
based on the Progress Monitoring Report
(DMEA/SMEA)
3 Monitored and evaluated 75-84% of the
Comprehensive Strategic Plans in the DEDP
based on the Progress Monitoring Report
(DMEA/SMEA)
2 Monitored and evaluated 65-74% of the
Comprehensive Strategic Plans in the DEDP
based on the Progress Monitoring Report
(DMEA/SMEA)
1 Monitored and evaluated 50-64% of the
Comprehensive Strategic Plans in the DEDP
based on the Progress Monitoring Report
(DMEA/SMEA)
1.3 Strengthened the culture of 2%
research through the design and
evaluation of quality and
relevant proposals anchored on
the basic education research
agenda
1.4 Enhanced SBM level of 2%
practice in the light of BE-LCP
implementation with provision of
TA
1.5 Ensured efficient flow of 2%
communication within the
division, schools, other agencies
and stakeholders.
5 100% research proposals anchored on the
key thematic areas (Teaching and Learning,
Child Protection, Human Resource,
Governance, Inclusive Education, DRRM,
and GAD) approved by the SDRC/RRC.
4 85%-89% research proposals anchored on
the key thematic areas (Teaching and
Learning, Child Protection, Human Resource,
Governance, Inclusive Education, DRRM,
and GAD) approved by the SDRC/RRC.
3 75%-84% research proposals achored on the
key thematic areas (Teaching and Learning,
Child Protection, Human Resource,
Governance, Inclusive Education, DRRM,
and GAD) approved by the SDRC/RRC.
2 65%-74% research proposals anchored on
the key thematic areas (Teaching and
Learning, Child Protection, Human Resource,
Governance, Inclusive Education, DRRM,
and GAD) approved by the SDRC/RRC.
1 50%-64% research proposals anchored on
the key thematic areas (Teaching and
Learning, Child Protection, Human Resource,
Governance, Inclusive Education, DRRM,
and GAD) approved by the SDRC/RRC.
5 100% of 125 elementary and secondary
schools assessed and given TA by the DO
4 85-99% of 125 elementary and secondary
schools assessed and given TA by the DO
3 75-84% of 125 elementary and secondary
schools assessed and given TA by the DO
2 65-74% of 125 elementary and secondary
schools assessed and given TA by the DO
1 50-64% of 125 elementary and secondary
schools assessed and given TA by the DO
5 96-100% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools).
division, schools, other agencies
and stakeholders.
1.6 Ensured timely and accurate 4%
submission of data through the
different information systems;
namely: LIS, BEIS, PMIS, HRIS
1.7 Intensified the 2%
implementation of DRRM
Programs and policies with the
provision of TA.
4 81-95% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools).
3 75-80% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools).
2 65-74% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools).
1 1-50% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools).
5 Submitted and validated 100% of 222 public
schools and private schools/ implementing
units
4 Submitted and validated 85% of 222 public
schools and private schools/ implementing
units
3 Submitted and validated 75% of 222 public
schools and private schools/ implementing
units
2 Submitted and validated 65% of 222 public
schools and private schools/ implementing
units
1 Submitted and validated 50% of 222 public
schools and private schools/ implementing
units
5 100% of 125 schools have conducted the 5
activities and all the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement.
4 85% of 125 schools have conducted the 5
activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement.
provision of TA.
1.8 Ensured a healthy learning 2%
environment for the teaching
and non-teaching pax through
the implementation of six (6)
health flagship programs of the
Division
1.9 Ensured coordination with 2%
the Division Field Technical
Assistance Team (DFTAT) for
the provision of technical
assistance in the division and
schools.
3 75% of 125 schools have conducted the 5
activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
2 enhancement.
65% of 125 schools have conducted the 5
activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
1 enhancement.
50% of 125 schools have conducted the 5
activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement.
5 100 % of 125 schools implemented the six (6)
flagship programs such as NDEP, Mental
health, Adolescent Reproductive Health,
SBFP, Medical-Dental Nursing Services and
WINS
4 85% of 125 schools implemented the six (6)
flagship programs
3 75% of 125 schools implemented the six (6)
flagship programs
2 65% of 125 schools implemented the six (6)
flagship programs
1 50% of 125 schools implemented the six (6)
flagship programs
5 100% of the Division Key Personnel/Program
Holders coordinated with the DFTAT for the
provision of technical assistance.
4 85-99% of the Division Key
Personnel/Program Holders coordinated with
the DFTAT for the provision of technical
assistance.
3 75-84% of the Division Key
Personnel/Program Holders coordinated with
the DFTAT for the provision of technical
assistance.
2 65-74% of the Division Key
Personnel/Program Holders coordinated with
the DFTAT for the provision of technical
assistance.
1 50-64% of the Division Key
Personnel/Program Holders coordinated with
the DFTAT for the provision of technical
assistance.
 1.10 Intensified the provision of 2%
technical assistance based on
school needs anchored on SBM
Principles (Leadership and
Governance, Curriculum
Implementation, Resource
management and Continuous
Improvement, Linkages and
School management)
1.11 Strengthened the 2%
implementation of Youth
Formation programs;
SUB-TOTAL
2. Curriculum 2.1 Intensified the monitoring 2%
and and supervision of private
Instruction schools in adherence to DepEd
Management Standards and regulatory
FOCAL: CID policies
5 100% of all elementary and secondary
schools were provided with Technical
Assistance (TA) based on their needs.
4 85-99% of all elementary and secondary
schools were provided with Technical
Assistance (TA) based on their needs.
3 75-84% of all elementary and secondary
schools were provided with Technical
Assistance (TA) based on their needs.
2 65-74% of all elementary and secondary
schools were provided with Technical
Assistance (TA) based on their needs.
1 50-64% of all elementary and secondary
schools were provided with Technical
Assistance (TA) based on their needs.
5 5 programs, projects, and activities on youth
formation were effectively implemented as
initiated by the division and or mandated by
the central office / regional office.
4 Implemented at least 4 programs
3 Implemented at least 3 programs
2 Implemented at least 2 programs
1 Implemented at least 1 program
5 100% of private schools have permit to
operate/recognition and FLO permit
4 85-99% of private schools have permit to
operate/recognition and FLO permit
3 75-84% of private schools have permit to
operate/recognition and FLO permit
2 65-74% of private schools have permit to
operate/recognition and FLO permit
1 50-64% of private schools have permit to
operate/recognition and FLO permit
2.2 Strengthened the monitoring 5% 5 14 Programs were effectively implemented
of the Basic Education with regular monitoring and documentation.
Curriculum (K to 12)
implementation and other
support educational programs 4 12 Programs were effectively implemented
such as: ALIVE, IPED, SPED,
with regular monitoring and documentation.
SPA, SPS, SPFL, SPJ, Special
Science Schools, ALS, OHSP,
STVEP, DCP/DICP, Multigrade,
MTB-MLE, ELLN 3 10 Programs were effectively implemented
with regular monitoring and documentation.

2 8 Programs were effectively implemented

with regular monitoring and documentation.

1 6 Programs were effectively implemented

with regular monitoring and documentation.

2.3.1 Enhanced the division 2% 5 100% of the schools implemented the

initiatives on reading of 'I Hear division initiatives
Kids Read', iRead, various
reading initiatives, and Manual
for Intentional Mentoring 4 85% of the schools implemented the division
Mechanism for Teacher- initiatives
Advisers and other areas of
concern

3 75% of the schools implemented the division

initiatives

2 65% of the schools implemented the division

initiatives

1 50% of the schools implemented the division

initiatives

2.3.2 Enhanced the utilization 4% 5 100% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized

of learning resource via the enhanced learning resources
supplementary learning
materials such as radio and
video lessons broadcasted in
local stations and CDO Youtube
channel 4 85% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized
the enhanced learning resources and
assessment tools

2.3.3. Ensured submission of 2%
grades for monitoring of student
academic perfomance,
characterization, and
identification of needs for TA
interventions.
2.4.1 Addressed learning 2%
resource gaps by initiating and
directing development of Local
Curriculum Materials based on
the Needs Assessment Result
across learning areas and
educational programs such as
ALIVE, ADM, ALS, IPED, MTB,
Multigrade, SPA, SPJ, GAD,
Guidance, SSG
3 75% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized
the enhanced learning resources
2 65% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized
the enhanced learning resources and
assessment tools
1 50% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized
the enhanced learning resources and
assessment tools
5 100% of schools submitted grades with
characterization, TA needs, and interventions
implemented.
4 85% of schools submitted grades with
characterization, TA needs, and interventions
implemented.
3 75% of schools submitted grades with
characterization, TA needs, and interventions
implemented.
2 65% of schools submitted grades with
characterization, TA needs, and interventions
implemented.
1 50% of schools submitted grades with
characterization, TA needs, and interventions
implemented.
5 Designed and developed contextualized,
localized, indigenized materials in 8 learning
areas or 10 support educational programs
4 Designed and developed contextualized,
localized, indigenized materials in 6 learning
areas or 8 support educational programs
Multigrade, SPA, SPJ, GAD,
Guidance, SSG

3 Designed and developed contextualized,

localized, indigenized materials in 4 learning
areas or 6 support educational programs

2 Designed and developed contextualized,

localized, indigenized materials in 2 learning
areas or 4 support educational programs

1 Designed and developed contextualized,

localized, indigenized materials in 1 learning
areas or 2 support educational programs

2.4.2. Intensified utilization of 2% 5 100% of quality assured and approved local

quality assured and approved curriculum materials are utilized division-wide
local curriculum materials in 8
learning areas or 10 support
educational programs such as
kinder, ALIVE, ADM, ALS,
IPED, MTB, Multigrade, SPA, 4 85% of quality assured and approved local
SPJ, GAD, Guidance, SSG curriculum materials are utilized division-wide

3 75% of quality assured and approved local

curriculum materials are utilized division-wide

2 65% of quality assured and approved local

curriculum materials are utilized division-wide

1 50% of quality assured and approved local

curriculum materials are utilized division-wide

2.5. Recommended evaluation 2% 5 100% of the schools applied for

on the separation of annexes establishment/separation/integrated schools
and integration of public are evaluated & recommended for approval
secondary schools
4 85% of the schools applied for
establishment/separation/integrated schools
are evaluated & recommended for approval
secondary schools

3 75% of the schools applied for

establishment/separation/integrated schools
are evaluated & recommended for approval

2 65% of the schools applied for

establishment/separation/integrated schools
are evaluated & recommended for approval

1 50% of the schools applied for

establishment/separation/integrated schools
are evaluated & recommended for approval

2.6. Intensified monitoring of 2% 5 100% of private schools were monitored.

private schools as to
compliance with standards in
the implementation of the k to 4 85-99% of private schools were monitored.
12 curricular requirements.

3 75-84% of private schools were monitored.

2 65-74% of private schools were monitored.

1 50-64% of private schools were monitored.

2.7. Intensified the provision of 3% 5 100% of elementary and secondary school

Technical Assistance on the were provided Technical Assistance (TA)
implementation of the different based on their modalities offered.
learning modalities
4 85% of elementary and secondary school
were provided Technical Assistance (TA)
based modalities offered.

3 75% of elementary and secondary school

were provided Technical Assistance (TA)
based modalities offered.

2 65% of elementary and secondary school

were provided Technical Assistance (TA)
based modalities offered.

1 50% of elementary and secondary school

were provided Technical Assistance (TA)
based modalities offered.
SUB-TOTAL
3. Human 3.1 Ensured that hiring, placing 5%
Resource and evaluating processess in
Development compliance to the existing CSC
and Rules and Regulations and
Management DepEd Issuances
FOCAL:
OSDS-HR,
SGOD-HR
3.2 Strengthened the 2%
processing of application for
leave (sick/ vacation/ maternity/
study/ travel abroad) application
for Equivalent Record Forms
(ERFs) of teaching/ both
elementary/ secondary(junior-
senior high) and retirement with
supporting documents
3.3Ensured the high level of 3%
performance of personnel
through periodic close
monitoring, coaching
performance evaluating and
recognition system
5 96 - 100% compliant to the hiring, placing
and evaluating processes to the exisiting
CSC Rules and Regulations and Deped
Issuances
4 81 - 95% compliant to the hiring, placing and
evaluating processes to the exisiting CSC
Rules and Regulations and Deped Issuances
3 75 - 80% compliant to the hiring, placing and
evaluating processes to the exisiting CSC
Rules and Regulations and Deped Issuances
2 65 - 74% compliant to the hiring, placing and
evaluating processes to the exisiting CSC
Rules and Regulations and Deped Issuances
1 64 - 50% compliant to the hiring, placing and
evaluating processes to the exisiting CSC
Rules and Regulations and Deped Issuances
5 96-100% of applications officially received
with complete documents been evaluated
and processed
4 81-95% of applications officially received with
complete documents been evaluated and
processed
3 75-80% of applications officially received with
complete documents been evaluated and
processed
2 74-65% of applications officially received with
complete documents been evaluated and
processed
1 64-50% of applications officially received with
complete documents been evaluated and
processed
5 5 activities were conducted to ensure high
level of performance of personnel: (1)
Crafting of ratee-rater agreement -IPCRF; (2)
Conduct of midyear coaching; (3) Conduct of
Year-end evaluation; (4) Consolidation of
performance ratings; (5) Crafting of
memoranda and documentation of
conference activities
4 4 activities were conducted to ensure high
level of performance of personnel

3.4 Enhanced the formulation of 2%
staff Development plan &
welfare programs in the division.
3.5 Ensured competency needs 3%
of personnel are met through
the implementation of the
Human Resource Development
Plan of the division and
Professional Learning and
Development of every school or
functional unit
3.6 Enhanced service delivery 2%
through PRIME HRM
3 3 activities were conducted to ensure high
level of performance of personnel
2 2 activities were conducted to ensure high
level of performance of personnel
1 1 activity was conducted to ensure high level
of performance of personnel
5 Determined 5 training needs of personnel in
schools division.
4 Determined 4 training needs of personnel in
schools division.
3 Determined 3 training needs of personnel in
schools division.
2 Determined 2 training needs of personnel in
schools division.
1 Determined 1 training need/s of personnel in
schools division.
5 100% of Schools in the Division have their
SLAC & INSET submitted, reviewed and
approved
4 80% of Schools in the Divsion have their
SLAC & INSET submitted, reviewed and
approved
3 60% of Schools in the Division have their
SLAC & INSET submitted, reviewed and
approved
2 40% of Schools in the Division have their
SLAC & INSET submitted, reviewed and
approved
1 20% of Schools in the Division have their
SLAC & INSET submitted, reviewed and
approved
5 100% of the evidence requirements were
compliant to CSC PRIME-HRM maturity level
indicators
4 85-99% of the evidence requirements were
compliant to CSC PRIME-HRM maturity level
indicators
3 75-84% of the evidence requirements were
compliant to CSC PRIME-HRM maturity level
indicators
2 65-74% of the evidence requirements were
compliant to CSC PRIME-HRM maturity level
indicators

3.7 Strengthened employee 3%
morale by recognizing
exemplary initiatives and
practices of teaching and non-
teaching personnel through the
Project PRAISE (I AM CDO
SEAL OF EXCELLENCE)
3.8 Ensured that complaints 2%
against personnel brought
before the Division are acted
upon for non-teaching personnel
and indorsed to the RD for
appropriate action for teaching
personnel.
SUBTOTAL
IV. 4.1 Intensified and sustained the 4%
RESOURCE implementation of resource
MANAGEME management through effective,
NT efficient and economical control
and monitoring of all funds from
all sources throughout the year.
4.2 Ensured an updated and 2%
accurate inventory of school
buildings, education facilities
and other properties in the
division within the year.
1 50-64% of the evidence requirements were
compliant to CSC PRIME-HRM maturity level
indicators
5 Crafted & Desiminated a Division
Memorandum to the Field for all employees
(100%) to participate in the search of
Outstanding Employee
4 Crafted & Desiminated a Division
Memorandum to the Field for all employees
(80%) to participate in the search of
Outstanding Employee
3 Crafted & Desiminated a Division
Memorandum to the Field for all employees
(60%) to participate in the search of
Outstanding Employee
2 Crafted & Desiminated a Division
Memorandum to the Field for all employees
(40%) to participate in the search of
Outstanding Employee
1 Crafted & Desiminated a Division
Memorandum to the Field for all employees
(20%) to participate in the search of
Outstanding Employee
5
4
3
2
5
4
3
5 95%-100% of Infrastructure projects
delivered to the End Users in compliance with
the Plans and Technical Specifications
 4.2 Ensured an updated and 2%
accurate inventory of school
buildings, education facilities
and other properties in the
division within the year.
4 80% - 94% of Infrastructure projects
delivered to the End Users in compliance with
the Plans and Technical Specifications

3 60% - 79% of Infrastructure projects

delivered to the End Users in compliance with
the Plans and Technical Specifications

2 40% - 59% of Infrastructure projects

delivered to the End Users in compliance with
the Plans and Technical Specifications

1 20% - 39% of Infrastructure projects

delivered to the End Users in compliance with
the Plans and Technical Specifications

4.3 Ensured timely 2% 5

implementation of programs and
projects through effective and 4
efficient procurement process
adhering to existing rules and
3
regulations.

4.4 Reinforced the resources of 2% 5

the Schools for priority programs
and projects through effective
collaboration with the Local 4
School Boards (LSB) in the
approval and implementation of
budget proposals. 3

SUBTOTAL
V. 5.1 Enhanced amd 5% 5 100% of the 109 schools have presented at
PARTNERSH strengthened the provision of least five (5) of the Deed of Donations / MOA
IP AND schools' resources thru
LINKAGES mobilizing support/assistance 4 85% of the 109 schools have presented at
and linkages from various least of
fivethe(5)109
of the Deedhave
of Donations
3 75% schools presented/ MOA
at
education stakeholders.
2 least five (5) of the Deed of Donations
65 % of the 109 schools have presented at / MOA
1 least
50% offivethe(5)109
of the Deedhave
schools of Donations
presented/ MOA
at
least five (5) of the Deed of Donations / MOA
 5.2 Intensified proper
coordination relative to disaster
risk reduction through efficient
communication and linkage
among CDO City Disaster Risk
Reduction Management Council
agencies and other
stakeholders.
5.3 Enhanced acquisition of 2%
adequate resources of schools
and learning centers by
strengthening and sustaining
relationships and collaboration
with the Local Government Unit
(LGU), NGO and NGA and other
stakeholders to support special
programs and projects of the
division.
SUBTOTAL
VI. OTHER 6.1 Ensured performance of 5%
TASKS other functions as may be
assigned by higher office.
SUBTOTAL
GRAND 100%
TOTAL
2% 5 Coordinated with 5 or more agencies or
stakeholders
4 Coordinated with 4 agencies or stakeholders
3 Coordinated with 3 agencies or stakeholders
2 Coordinated with 2 agencies or stakeholders
1 Coordinated with 1 agency or stakeholder
5 Generated at least 10 Million Pesos in cash
or in kind from external stakeholders
4 Generated at least 8 Million Pesos in cash or
in kind from external stakeholders
3 Generated at least 6 Million Pesos in cash or
in kind from external stakeholders
2 Generated at least 4 Million Pesos in cash or
in kind from external stakeholders
1 Generated at least 2 Million Pesos in cash or
in kind from external stakeholders
5
4
MITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

N DURING PLANNING
Key Performance Indicators
EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
100% of programs and initiatives in the
DEDP are implemented

85-99% of programs and initiatives in the

DEDP are implemented

75-84% of programs and initiatives in the

DEDP are implemented

65-74% of programs and initiatives in the

DEDP are implemented

50-64% of programs and initiatives in the

DEDP are implemented

Conducted District/Division MEA in 4

quarters

Conducted District/Division MEA in 3

quarters

Conducted District/Division MEA in 2

quarters

Conducted District/Division MEA in 1 quarter

District/Division MEA not conducted

Published 10 basic education research Reviewed all the Research Proposals 5 days
anchored on the key thematic areas in the before the deadline
peer-reviewed journal

Presented 10 basic education research Reviewed all the Research Proposals on

anchored on the key thematic areas in the time
international conference

Presented 10 basic education research Reviewed all the Research Proposals 3

anchored on the key thematic areas in the days after the deadline
national conference

Presented 10 basic education research Reviewed all the Research Proposals 2

anchored on the key thematic areas in the days after the deadline
regional conference

Presented 10 basic education research Reviewed all the Research Proposals 1 day
anchored on the key thematic areas in the after the deadline
division conference

10% of the schools were validated by the RO 100% of the schools were assessed and
validated within the year

8% of the schools were validated by the RO 85-99% of the schools were assessed and
validated within the year

6% of the schools were validated by the RO 75-84% of the schools were assessed and
validated within the year

4% of the schools were validated by the RO 65-74% of the schools were assessed and
validated within the year
2% of the schools were validated by the RO 50-64% of the schools were assessed and
validated within the year

96-100% ensured efficient flow of 96-100% ensured efficient flow of

communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the resources
allocated
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the period prescribed
by various legal issuances
81-95%% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the resources
allocated
75-80%% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the resources
allocated
65-74% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the resources
allocated
1-50% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the resources
allocated
81-95% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the period prescribed
by various legal issuances
75-80% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the period prescribed
by various legal issuances.
65-74% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the period prescribed
by various legal issuances
1-50% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the period prescribed
by various legal issuances

100% of 222 public schools and private Submitted and validated 100% of 222 public
schools/ implementing units validated by DO schools and private schools/ implementing
units 5 days before the deadline

85% of 222 public schools and private Submitted and validated 85% of 222 public
schools/ implementing units validated by DO schools and private schools/ implementing
units on time
75% of 222 public schools and private Submitted and validated 75% of 222 public
schools/ implementing units validated by DO schools and private schools/ implementing
units 3 days after the deadline

65% of 222 public schools and private Submitted and validated 65% of 222 public
schools/ implementing units validated by DO schools and private schools/ implementing
units 2 days after the deadline

50% of 222 public schools and private Submitted and validated 50% of 222 public
schools/ implementing units validated by DO schools and private schools/ implementing
units 1 day after the deadline

100% of 125 schools have conducted the 5

activities and all the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement. within the year
85% of 125 schools have conducted the 5
activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement within the year
 75% of 125 schools have conducted the 5
activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement within have
65% of 125 schools the year
conducted the 5
activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement within have
50% of 125 schools the year
conducted the 5
activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement within the year
All 125 schools implemented the 6 flagship
programs within the school year

Out of 125 schools 85% implemented the 6

flagship programs within the school year

Out of 125 schools 75% implemented the 6

flagship programs within the school year

Out of 125 schools 65% implemented the 6

flagship programs within the school year

Out of 125 schools 50% implemented the 6

flagship programs within the school year

100% of the identified TA needs were Provision of TA is done in 4 quarters

addressed

85-99% of the identified TA needs were Provision of TA is done in 3 quarters

addressed

74-84% of the identified TA needs were Provision of TA is done in 2 quarters

addressed

65-74% of the identified TA needs were Provision of TA is done in 1 quarter

addressed

50-64% of the identified TA needs were TA was not provided

addressed
100% of the identified TA needs were
addressed
85-99% of the identified TA needs were
addressed
74-84% of the identified TA needs were
addressed
65-74% of the identified TA needs were
addressed
50-64% of the identified TA needs were
addressed
100% of programs, projects, and activities
were effectively implemented.
80% of programs, projects, and activities
were effectively implemented.
60% of programs, projects, and activities
were effectively implemented.
40% of programs, projects, and activities
were effectively implemented.
20% of programs, projects, and activities
were effectively implemented.
Provision of TA is done in 4 quarters
Provision of TA is done in 3 quarters
Provision of TA is done in 2 quarters
Provision of TA is done in 1 quarter
TA was not provided
Programs, projects, and activities were done
at least once in all 4 quarters.
Programs, projects, and activities were done
at least once during the 3 quarters.
Programs, projects, and activities were done
at least once during the 2 quarters.
A program, project, or activitiy was
conducted.
No programs, projects, nor activities were
conducted.
100% of operating private schools have
renewed permit to operate and FLO permit
at least 5 days prior to school opening
85-99% of operating private schools have
renewed permit to operate and FLO permit
at least 5 days prior to school opening
75-84% of operating private schools have
renewed permit to operate and FLO permit
at least 5 days prior to school opening
65-74% of operating private schools have
renewed permit to operate and FLO permit
at least 5 days prior to school opening
50-64% of operating private schools have
renewed permit to operate and FLO permit
at least 5 days prior to school opening
 100% of the identified programs were
delivered through the realization of learning
competencies per quarter,division and
school initiated curricular activities.
80% of the identified programs were
delivered through the realization of learning
competencies per quarter,division and
school initiated curricular activities.
60% of the identified programs were
delivered through the realization of learning
competencies per quarter,division and
school initiated curricular activities.
40% of the identified programs were
delivered through the realization of learning
competencies per quarter,division and
school initiated curricular activities.
20% of the identified programs were
delivered through the realization of learning
competencies per quarter,division and
school initiated curricular activities.

100% of the schools utilized any of the 100% of the schools submitted output after
various reading initiatives: "I Hear Kids the ulitizatilization of the reading initiatives.
Read, "Read O'clock", "Project KISS ni
Momshie", " i-READ."
85%-99% of the schools utilized any of the 85-99%% of the schools submitted output
various reading initiatives: "I Hear Kids after the ulitizatilization of the reading
Read, "Read O'clock", "Project KISS ni initiatives.
Momshie", " i-READ."
76%-84%% of the schools utilized any of the 76-84%% of the schools submitted output
various reading initiatives: "I Hear Kids after the ulitizatilization of the reading
Read, "Read O'clock", "Project KISS ni initiatives.
Momshie", " i-READ."
51%-74%% of the schools utilized any of the 51-74%% of the schools submitted output
various reading initiatives: "I Hear Kids after the ulitizatilization of the reading
Read, "Read O'clock", "Project KISS ni initiatives.
Momshie", " i-READ."
50 % and below of the schools utilized any of 50 %% of the schools submitted output after
the various reading initiatives: "I Hear Kids the ulitizatilization of the reading initiatives.
Read, "Read O'clock", "Project KISS ni
Momshie", " i-READ."

100% of 109 schools/learning centers supplementary learning resources will be

accessed the radio and video lessons via sent to the learning partner stations 5 days
local stations, division learning resource before the airing schedule
portal and cdo learning channel (youtube
and deped tayo)

85% of 109 schools/learning centers supplementary learning resources will be

accessed the radio and video lessons via sent to the learning partner stations 4 days
local stations, division learning resource before the airing schedule
portal and cdo learning channel (youtube
and deped tayo)
75% of 109 schools/learning centers
accessed the radio and video lessons via
local stations, division learning resource
portal and cdo learning channel (youtube
and deped tayo)
65% of 109 schools/learning centers
accessed the radio and video lessons via
local stations, division learning resource
portal and cdo learning channel (youtube
and deped tayo)
50% of 109 schools/learning centers
accessed the radio and video lessons via
local stations, division learning resource
portal and cdo learning channel (youtube
and deped tayo)
100% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the validated, contextualized,
localized and indigenized materials in 8
learning areas or 10 support educational
programs
85% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized
the validated, contextualized, localized and
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or The validated, contextualized, localized and
10 support educational programss
supplementary learning resources will be
sent to the learning partner stations 3 days
before the airing schedule
supplementary learning resources will be
sent to the learning partner stations 2 days
before the airing schedule
supplementary learning resources will be
sent to the learning partner stations 1 day
before the airing schedule
100% of schools has COMPLETE report in
CMSS for all Grading periods
85% of schools has COMPLETE report in
CMSS for all Grading periods
75% of schools has COMPLETE report in
CMSS for all Grading periods
65% of schools has COMPLETE report in
CMSS for all Grading periods
50% of schools has COMPLETE report in
CMSS for all Grading periods
The validated, contextualized, localized and
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or
10 support educational programs are
submitted 5 days before the deadline
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or
10 support educational programs are
submitted on time
75% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized
the validated, contextualized, localized and
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or
10 support educational programs The validated, contextualized, localized and
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or
10 support educational programs are
submitted 3 days after the deadline
65% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized
the validated, contextualized, localized and
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or The validated, contextualized, localized and
10 support educational programs indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or
10 support educational programs are
submitted 2 days after the deadline
50% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized
the validated, contextualized, localized and
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or The validated, contextualized, localized and
10 support educational programs indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or
10 support educational programs are
submitted 1 day after the deadline

100% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the quality assured and developed
local curriculum materials via division
learning resource portal and other learning
channel
The quality assured and developed local
curriculum materials are submitted 5 days
before the deadline

85% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized The quality assured and developed local
the quality assured and developed local curriculum materials are submitted on time
curriculum materials via division learning
resource portal and other learning channel

75% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized The quality assured and developed local
the quality assured and developed local curriculum materials are submitted 3 days
curriculum materials via division learning after the deadline
resource portal and other learning channel

65% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized The quality assured and developed local
the quality assured and developed local curriculum materials are submitted 2 days
curriculum materials via division learning after the deadline
resource portal and other learning channel

50% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized The quality assured and developed local
the validated, contextualized, localized and curriculum materials are submitted 1 day
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or after the deadline
10 support educational programs
100% of private schools were compliant to Private School monitoring was conducted in
regulatory requirements (permits and 4 quarters
reports).
85-99% of private schools were compliant to Private School monitoring was conducted in
regulatory requirements (permits and 3 quarters
reports).
75-84% of private schools were compliant to Private School monitoring was conducted in
regulatory requirements (permits and 2 quarters
reports).
65-74% of private schools were compliant to Private School monitoring was conducted in
regulatory requirements (permits and 1 quarters
reports).
50-64% of private schools were compliant to Private School monitoring was not
regulatory requirements (permits and conducted
reports).

E lementary and secondary school were

provided Technical Assistance (TA) based
on their modalities for 4 quarters
Elementary and secondary school were
provided Technical Assistance (TA) based
on their modalities offered for 3 quarters only

Elementary and secondary school were

provided Technical Assistance (TA) based
on their modalities offered for 2 quarters only

Elementary and secondary school were

provided Technical Assistance (TA) based
on their modalities offered for 1 quarter only

No Technical Assistance (TA) provided

based on their modalities.

96-100% all processed applications has no
corrections as to completeness of
documents
81-95% all processed applications has no
corrections as to completeness of
documents
75-80% all processed applications has no
corrections as to completeness of
documents
74-65% all processed applications has no
corrections as to completeness of
documents
64-50% all processed applications has no
corrections as to completeness of
documents
Conducted mentoring/coaching,
performance evaluation and recognition to
100% of personnel
Conducted mentoring/coaching,
performance evaluation and recognition to
85% of personnel
96-100% compliant to CSC rules and
regulations and Deped issuances on
Personnel Action within the prescribed
period
81-95% compliant to CSC rules and
regulations and Deped issuances on
Personnel Action within the pprescribed
period
75-80% compliant to CSC rules and
regulations and Deped issuances on
Personnel Action within the prescribed
period
65-74% compliant to CSC rules and
regulations and Deped issuances on
Personnel Action within the prescribed
period
64-50% compliant to CSC rules and
regulations and Deped issuances on
Personnel Action within the peprescribed
period
All applications received for leave are
processed within 3 days, ERF within 5 dyas
& retirement within 5 days
All applications received for leave are
processed within 5 days, ERF within 7 days
& retirement within 7 days
All applications received for leave are
processed within 7 days, ERF within 9 days
& retirement within 9 days
All applications received for leave are
processed within 9 days, ERF within 11 days
& retirement within 11 days
All applications received for leave are
processed within 10 days, ERF within 13
days & retirement within13 days
100% of the personnel were mentored,
evaluated and given recognition within the
rating period.
85-99% of the personnel were mentored,
evaluated and given recognition within the
rating period.
Conducted mentoring/coaching,
performance evaluation and recognition to
75% of personnel
Conducted mentoring/coaching,
performance evaluation and recognition to
65% of personnel
Conducted mentoring/coaching,
performance evaluation and recognition to
64% and below of personnel
100% of the division personnel are trained
95% of the division personnel are trained
80% of the division personnel are trained
65% of the division personnel are trained
50% of the division personnel are trained
Schools have conducted 2 INSET & at least 100% of Schools in the Division have
10 or more SLACS conducted summer/mid-year SLAC &
monthly INSET
Schools have conducted 2 INSET & 8
SLACS
Schools have conducted 2 INSET & 6
SLACS
Schools have conducted 2 INSET & 4
SLACS
Schools have conducted 2 INSET & 2
SLACS
Submitted documents for application to CSC
Prepared complete documents
Initial documentation of key office processes
SDO undergone Orientation by CSC
75-84% of the personnel were mentored,
evaluated and given recognition within the
rating period.
65-74% of the personnel were mentored,
evaluated and given recognition within the
rating period.
64% and below of the personnel were
mentored, evaluated and given recognition
within the rating period.
100% of trainings are conducted as
scheduled based on various issuances
95% of trainings are conducted as scheduled
based on various issuances
80% of trainings are conducted as scheduled
based on various issuances
65% of trainings are conducted as scheduled
based on various issuances
50% of trainings are conducted as scheduled
based on various issuances
80% of Schools in the Division have
conducted summer/mid-year SLAC &
monthly INSET
60% of Schoolsvin the have conducted
summer/mid-year SLAC & monthly INSET
40% of Schools in the Division have
conducted summer/mid-year SLAC &
monthly INSET
20% of Schools in the have conducted
summer/mid-year SLAC & monthly INSET
Conceptualized plan for PRIME HRM
accreditation

100% of the schools in the Division have 50% of Division entries are choosen as
participated in the division search for winners in the Regional Search for
Outstanding employee Outstanding Employees

80% of the schools in the Division have 40% of Division entries are choosen as
participated in the division search for winners in the Regional Search for
Outstanding employee Outstanding Employees

60% of the schools in the Division have 30% of Division entries are choosen as
participated in the division search for winners in the Regional Search for
Outstanding employee Outstanding Employees

40% of the schools in the Division have 20% of Division entries are choosen as
participated in the division search for winners in the Regional Search for
Outstanding employee Outstanding Employees

20% of the schools in the Division have 10% of Division entries are choosen as
participated in the division search for winners in the Regional Search for
Outstanding employee Outstanding Employees

100% of the complaints had been acted

upon
85-99% of the complaints had been acted
upon
75-84% of the complaints had been acted
upon
65-74% of the complaints had been acted
upon
50-64% of the complaints had been acted
upon

Budget utilization and CA liquidation rates

increased to 100%;
Budget utilization and CA liquidation rates
increased to 85-99%
Budget utilization and CA liquidation
increased to 75-84%
Budget utilization and CA liquidation rates
increased to 65-74%
Budget utilization and CA liquidation rates
increased to 50%
95%-100% of Infrastructure Projects closely 95%-100% of Infrastructure Projects turned-
monitored; Installed materials were properly over to the end user within the specified
checked and recommended other solutions Contract Duration
to avoid the delay of the projects.
80%-94% of Infrastructure Projects closely 80%-94% of Infrastructure Projects turned-
monitored; Installed materials were properly over to the end user within the specified
checked and recommended other solutions Contract Duration
to avoid the delay of the projects.

60%-79% of Infrastructure Projects closely 60%-79% of Infrastructure Projects turned-

monitored; Installed materials were properly over to the end user within the specified
checked and recommended other solutions Contract Duration
to avoid the delay of the projects.

40%-59% of Infrastructure Projects closely 40%-59% of Infrastructure Projects turned-

monitored; Installed materials were properly over to the end user within the specified
checked and recommended other solutions Contract Duration
to avoid the delay of the projects.

20%-39% of Infrastructure Projects closely 20%-39% of Infrastructure Projects turned-

monitored; Installed materials were properly over to the end user within the specified
checked and recommended other solutions Contract Duration
to avoid the delay of the projects.

Goods and services were procured 5 days

before the implementation of PPAs
Goods and services were procured 4 days
before the implementation of PPAs
Goods and services were procured 3 days
before the implementation of PPAs
Goods and services were procured 2 days
before the implementation of PPAs
Goods and services were procured 1 day
before the implementation of PPAs
100% of the budget proposals were
approved by the LSB and implemented in
the schools.

85% of the budget proposals were approved

by the LSB and implemented in the schools.

75% of the budget proposals were approved

by the LSB and implemented in the schools.

65% of the budget proposals were approved

by the LSB and implemented in the schools.

50% of the budget proposals were approved

by the LSB and implemented in the schools.

100% of the 109 schools have submitted 100% of the 109 schools have presented at
Brigada Reports (DPDS) least five (5) of the accomplished and
completely signed DOD or MOA
85 % of the 109 schools have submitted 80% of the 109 schools have presented at
Brigada
75% Reports
of the (DPDS)have submitted
109 Schools least five
60% (5)109
of the of the accomplished
schools and at
have presented
Brigada Reports100% of have
65 % of the 109 schools the 109 schools
submitted completely
least five signed
(5) of the DOD or MOA
accomplished and at
40% of the 109 schools have presented
have submitted
Brigada ReportsBrigada
(DPDS) Reports (DPDS)
50% of the 109 schools have submitted completely
least five signed
(5) of the DOD or MOA
accomplished and at
20% of the 109 schools have presented
Brigada Reports (DPDS) completely signed DOD or MOA
least five (5) of the accomplished and
completely signed DOD or MOA
Conducted DRRM activities to schools in
partnership with 5 agencies/stockholders
Conducted DRRM activities to schools in
partnership with 4 agencies/stockholders
Conducted DRRM activities to schools in
partnership with 3 agencies/stockholders
Conducted DRRM activities to schools in
partnership with 2 agencies/stockholders
Conducted DRRM activities to schools in
partnership with 1 agency/stockholder
Coordinated with 5 or more agencies or
stakeholders within the year
Coordinated with 4 agencies stakeholders
within the year
Coordinated with 3 agencies or stakeholders
within the year
Coordinated with 2 agencies or stakeholders
within the year
Coordinated with 1 agency or stakeholder
within the year

Accomplished 5 tasks delegated by higher

office.
Accomplished 4 tasks delegated by higher
office.
Accomplished 3 tasks delegated by higher
office.
Accomplished 2 tasks delegated by higher
office.
Accomplished 1 tasks delegated by higher
office.

Qualitative Description
 2022 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (O
Name of Employee: CHERRY MAE L. LIMBACO-REYES, Ph.D. CESO V
Position: Schools Division Superintendent
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Cagayan de Oro City
Rating Period: January - December 2022
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Key Result Key Performance Indicat
Weight
Areas (KRAs) Objectives
per KRA QUALITY
1. Strategic 1.1 Ensured delivery of quality 5% 5 100% of programs and initiatives are
Management and accessible basic education incoporated in the DEDP and supported with
and through formulation of evidence- approved Program Plans/Work and Financial
Operations based and collaboratively Plans
planned programs and initiatives
4 85-99% of programs and initiatives are
translated in the Division incoporated in the DEDP and supported with
Education Development Plan approved Program Plans/Work and Financial
(DEDP) and BE-LCP.
Plans
3 75-84% of programs and initiatives are
incoporated in the DEDP and supported with
approved Program Plans/Work and Financial
Plans
2 65-74% of programs and initiatives are
incoporated in the DEDP and supported with
approved Program Plans/Work and Financial
Plans
1 50-64% of programs and initiatives are
incoporated in the DEDP and supported with
approved Program Plans/Work and Financial
Plans

1.2 Intensified the monitoring 3% 5 Monitored and evaluated 100% of the

and evaluation of the Division Comprehensive Strategic Plans in the DEDP
Education Development Plan based on the Progress Monitoring Report
(DEDP) implementation. (DMEA/SMEA)
4 Monitored and evaluated 85-99% of the
Comprehensive Strategic Plans in the DEDP
based on the Progress Monitoring Report
(DMEA/SMEA)
3 Monitored and evaluated 75-84% of the
Comprehensive Strategic Plans in the DEDP
based on the Progress Monitoring Report
(DMEA/SMEA)
2 Monitored and evaluated 65-74% of the
Comprehensive Strategic Plans in the DEDP
based on the Progress Monitoring Report
(DMEA/SMEA)
1 Monitored and evaluated 50-64% of the
Comprehensive Strategic Plans in the DEDP
based on the Progress Monitoring Report
(DMEA/SMEA)
1.3 Strengthened the culture of 2%
research through the design and
evaluation of quality and
relevant proposals anchored on
the basic education research
agenda
1.4 Enhanced SBM level of 2%
practice in the light of BE-LCP
implementation with provision of
TA
1.5 Ensured efficient flow of 2%
communication within the
division, schools, other agencies
and stakeholders.
5 100% research proposals anchored on the
key thematic areas (Teaching and Learning,
Child Protection, Human Resource,
Governance, Inclusive Education, DRRM,
and GAD) approved by the SDRC/RRC.
4 85-89% research proposals anchored on the
key thematic areas (Teaching and Learning,
Child Protection, Human Resource,
Governance, Inclusive Education, DRRM,
and GAD) approved by the SDRC/RRC.
3 75-84% research proposals achored on the
key thematic areas (Teaching and Learning,
Child Protection, Human Resource,
Governance, Inclusive Education, DRRM,
and GAD) approved by the SDRC/RRC.
2 65-74% research proposals anchored on the
key thematic areas (Teaching and Learning,
Child Protection, Human Resource,
Governance, Inclusive Education, DRRM,
and GAD) approved by the SDRC/RRC.
1 50-64% research proposals anchored on the
key thematic areas (Teaching and Learning,
Child Protection, Human Resource,
Governance, Inclusive Education, DRRM,
and GAD) approved by the SDRC/RRC.
5 100% of 125 elementary and secondary
schools assessed and given TA by the DO
4 85-99% of 125 elementary and secondary
schools assessed and given TA by the DO
3 75-84% of 125 elementary and secondary
schools assessed and given TA by the DO
2 65-74% of 125 elementary and secondary
schools assessed and given TA by the DO
1 50-64% of 125 elementary and secondary
schools assessed and given TA by the DO
5 100% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools).
division, schools, other agencies
and stakeholders.
1.6 Ensured timely and accurate 4%
submission of data through the
different information systems;
namely: LIS, BEIS, PMIS, HRIS
1.7 Intensified the 2%
implementation of DRRM
Programs and policies with the
provision of TA.
4 85-99% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools).
3 75-84% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools).
2 65-74% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools).
1 50-64% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools).
5 Submitted and validated 100% of 222 public
schools and private schools/ implementing
units
4 Submitted and validated 85-99% of 222
public schools and private schools/
implementing units
3 Submitted and validated 75-84% of 222
public schools and private schools/
implementing units
2 Submitted and validated 65-74% of 222
public schools and private schools/
implementing units
1 Submitted and validated 50-64% of 222
public schools and private schools/
implementing units
5 100% of 125 schools have conducted the 5
activities and all the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement.
4 85-99% of 125 schools have conducted the 5
activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement.
provision of TA.
1.8 Ensured a healthy learning 2%
environment for the teaching
and non-teaching pax through
the implementation of six (6)
health flagship programs of the
Division
1.9 Ensured coordination with 2%
the Division Field Technical
Assistance Team (DFTAT) for
the provision of technical
assistance in the division and
schools.
3 75-84% of 125 schools have conducted the 5
activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
2 enhancement.
65-74% of 125 schools have conducted the 5
activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
1 enhancement.
50-64% of 125 schools have conducted the 5
activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement.
5 100 % of 125 schools implemented the six (6)
flagship programs such as NDEP, Mental
health, Adolescent Reproductive Health,
SBFP, Medical-Dental Nursing Services and
WINS
4 85-99% of 125 schools implemented the six
(6) flagship programs
3 75-84% of 125 schools implemented the six
(6) flagship programs
2 65-74% of 125 schools implemented the six
(6) flagship programs
1 50-64% of 125 schools implemented the six
(6) flagship programs
5 100% of the Division Key Personnel/Program
Holders coordinated with the DFTAT for the
provision of technical assistance.
4 85-99% of the Division Key
Personnel/Program Holders coordinated with
the DFTAT for the provision of technical
assistance.
3 75-84% of the Division Key
Personnel/Program Holders coordinated with
the DFTAT for the provision of technical
assistance.
2 65-74% of the Division Key
Personnel/Program Holders coordinated with
the DFTAT for the provision of technical
assistance.
1 50-64% of the Division Key
Personnel/Program Holders coordinated with
the DFTAT for the provision of technical
assistance.
 1.10 Intensified the provision of 2%
technical assistance based on
school needs anchored on SBM
Principles (Leadership and
Governance, Curriculum
Implementation, Resource
management and Continuous
Improvement, Linkages and
School management)
1.11 Strengthened the 2%
implementation of Youth
Formation programs;
SUB-TOTAL
2. Curriculum 2.1 Intensified the monitoring 2%
and and supervision of private
Instruction schools in adherence to DepEd
Management Standards and regulatory
policies
5 100% of all elementary and secondary
schools were provided with Technical
Assistance (TA) based on their needs.
4 85-99% of all elementary and secondary
schools were provided with Technical
Assistance (TA) based on their needs.
3 75-84% of all elementary and secondary
schools were provided with Technical
Assistance (TA) based on their needs.
2 65-74% of all elementary and secondary
schools were provided with Technical
Assistance (TA) based on their needs.
1 50-64% of all elementary and secondary
schools were provided with Technical
Assistance (TA) based on their needs.
5 5 programs, projects, and activities on youth
formation were effectively implemented as
initiated by the division and or mandated by
the central office / regional office.
4 Implemented at least 4 programs
3 Implemented at least 3 programs
2 Implemented at least 2 programs
1 Implemented at least 1 program
5 100% of private schools have permit to
operate/recognition and FLO permit
4 85-99% of private schools have permit to
operate/recognition and FLO permit
3 75-84% of private schools have permit to
operate/recognition and FLO permit
2 65-74% of private schools have permit to
operate/recognition and FLO permit
1 50-64% of private schools have permit to
operate/recognition and FLO permit
2.2 Strengthened the monitoring 5% 5 14 Programs were effectively implemented
of the Basic Education with regular monitoring and documentation.
Curriculum (K to 12)
implementation and other
support educational programs 4 12 Programs were effectively implemented
such as: ALIVE, IPED, SPED,
with regular monitoring and documentation.
SPA, SPS, SPFL, SPJ, Special
Science Schools, ALS, OHSP,
STVEP, DCP/DICP, Multigrade,
MTB-MLE, ELLN 3 10 Programs were effectively implemented
with regular monitoring and documentation.

2 8 Programs were effectively implemented

with regular monitoring and documentation.

1 6 Programs were effectively implemented

with regular monitoring and documentation.

2.3.1 Enhanced the division 2% 5 100% of the schools implemented the

initiatives on reading of 'I Hear division initiatives
Kids Read', iRead, various
reading initiatives, and Manual
for Intentional Mentoring 4 85-99% of the schools implemented the
Mechanism for Teacher- division initiatives
Advisers and other areas of
concern

3 75-84% of the schools implemented the

division initiatives

2 65-74% of the schools implemented the

division initiatives

1 50-64% of the schools implemented the

division initiatives

2.3.2 Enhanced the utilization 4% 5 100% of 109 schools/learning centers utilized

of learning resource via the enhanced learning resources
supplementary learning
materials such as radio and
video lessons broadcasted in
local stations and CDO Youtube
channel 4 85-99% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the enhanced learning resources and
assessment tools

2.3.3. Ensured submission of 2%
grades for monitoring of student
academic perfomance,
characterization, and
identification of needs for TA
interventions.
2.4.1 Addressed learning 2%
resource gaps by initiating and
directing development of Local
Curriculum Materials based on
the Needs Assessment Result
across learning areas and
educational programs such as
ALIVE, ADM, ALS, IPED, MTB,
Multigrade, SPA, SPJ, GAD,
Guidance, SSG
3 75-84% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the enhanced learning resources
2 65-74% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the enhanced learning resources and
assessment tools
1 50-64% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the enhanced learning resources and
assessment tools
5 100% of schools submitted grades with
characterization, TA needs, and interventions
implemented.
4 85-99% of schools submitted grades with
characterization, TA needs, and interventions
implemented.
3 75-84% of schools submitted grades with
characterization, TA needs, and interventions
implemented.
2 65-74% of schools submitted grades with
characterization, TA needs, and interventions
implemented.
1 50-64% of schools submitted grades with
characterization, TA needs, and interventions
implemented.
5 Designed and developed contextualized,
localized, indigenized materials in 8 learning
areas or 10 support educational programs
4 Designed and developed contextualized,
localized, indigenized materials in 6 learning
areas or 8 support educational programs
Multigrade, SPA, SPJ, GAD,
Guidance, SSG

3 Designed and developed contextualized,

localized, indigenized materials in 4 learning
areas or 6 support educational programs

2 Designed and developed contextualized,

localized, indigenized materials in 2 learning
areas or 4 support educational programs

1 Designed and developed contextualized,

localized, indigenized materials in 1 learning
areas or 2 support educational programs

2.4.2. Intensified utilization of 2% 5 100% of quality assured and approved local

quality assured and approved curriculum materials are utilized division-wide
local curriculum materials in 8
learning areas or 10 support
educational programs such as
kinder, ALIVE, ADM, ALS,
IPED, MTB, Multigrade, SPA, 4 85-99% of quality assured and approved
SPJ, GAD, Guidance, SSG local curriculum materials are utilized
division-wide

3 75-84% of quality assured and approved

local curriculum materials are utilized
division-wide

2 65-74% of quality assured and approved

local curriculum materials are utilized
division-wide

1 50-64% of quality assured and approved

local curriculum materials are utilized
division-wide

2.5. Recommended evaluation 2% 5 100% of the schools applied for

on the separation of annexes establishment/separation/integrated schools
and integration of public are evaluated & recommended for approval
secondary schools
4 85-99% of the schools applied for
establishment/separation/integrated schools
are evaluated & recommended for approval
secondary schools

3 75-84% of the schools applied for

establishment/separation/integrated schools
are evaluated & recommended for approval

2 65-74% of the schools applied for

establishment/separation/integrated schools
are evaluated & recommended for approval

1 50-64% of the schools applied for

establishment/separation/integrated schools
are evaluated & recommended for approval

2.6. Intensified monitoring of 2% 5 100% of private schools were monitored.

private schools as to
compliance with standards in
the implementation of the k to 4 85-99% of private schools were monitored.
12 curricular requirements.

3 75-84% of private schools were monitored.

2 65-74% of private schools were monitored.

1 50-64% of private schools were monitored.

2.7. Intensified the provision of 3% 5 100% of elementary and secondary school

Technical Assistance on the were provided Technical Assistance (TA)
implementation of the different based on their modalities offered.
learning modalities
4 85-99% of elementary and secondary school
were provided Technical Assistance (TA)
based modalities offered.

3 75-84% of elementary and secondary school

were provided Technical Assistance (TA)
based modalities offered.

2 65-74% of elementary and secondary school

were provided Technical Assistance (TA)
based modalities offered.

1 50-64% of elementary and secondary school

were provided Technical Assistance (TA)
based modalities offered.
SUB-TOTAL
3. Human 3.1 Ensured that hiring, placing 5%
Resource and evaluating processess in
Development compliance to the existing CSC
and Rules and Regulations and
Management DepEd Issuances
FOCAL:
OSDS-HR,
SGOD-HR
3.2 Strengthened the 2%
processing of application for
leave (sick/ vacation/ maternity/
study/ travel abroad) application
for Equivalent Record Forms
(ERFs) of teaching/ both
elementary/ secondary(junior-
senior high) and retirement with
supporting documents
3.3Ensured the high level of 3%
performance of personnel
through periodic close
monitoring, coaching
performance evaluating and
recognition system
5 100% compliant to the hiring, placing and
evaluating processes to the exisiting CSC
Rules and Regulations and Deped Issuances
4 85-99% compliant to the hiring, placing and
evaluating processes to the exisiting CSC
Rules and Regulations and Deped Issuances
3 75-84% compliant to the hiring, placing and
evaluating processes to the exisiting CSC
Rules and Regulations and Deped Issuances
2 65-74% compliant to the hiring, placing and
evaluating processes to the exisiting CSC
Rules and Regulations and Deped Issuances
1 50-64% compliant to the hiring, placing and
evaluating processes to the exisiting CSC
Rules and Regulations and Deped Issuances
5 100% of applications officially received with
complete documents been evaluated and
processed
4 85-99% of applications officially received with
complete documents been evaluated and
processed
3 75-84% of applications officially received with
complete documents been evaluated and
processed
2 65-74% of applications officially received with
complete documents been evaluated and
processed
1 50-64% of applications officially received with
complete documents been evaluated and
processed
5 5 activities were conducted to ensure high
level of performance of personnel: (1)
Crafting of ratee-rater agreement -IPCRF; (2)
Conduct of midyear coaching; (3) Conduct of
Year-end evaluation; (4) Consolidation of
performance ratings; (5) Crafting of
memoranda and documentation of
conference activities
4 4 activities were conducted to ensure high
level of performance of personnel

3.4 Enhanced the formulation of 2%
staff Development plan &
welfare programs in the division.
3.5 Ensured competency needs 3%
of personnel are met through
the implementation of the
Human Resource Development
Plan of the division and
Professional Learning and
Development of every school or
functional unit
3.6 Enhanced service delivery 2%
through PRIME HRM
3 3 activities were conducted to ensure high
level of performance of personnel
2 2 activities were conducted to ensure high
level of performance of personnel
1 1 activity was conducted to ensure high level
of performance of personnel
5 Determined 5 training needs of personnel in
schools division.
4 Determined 4 training needs of personnel in
schools division.
3 Determined 3 training needs of personnel in
schools division.
2 Determined 2 training needs of personnel in
schools division.
1 Determined 1 training need/s of personnel in
schools division.
5 100% of Schools in the Division have their
SLAC & INSET submitted, reviewed and
approved
4 85-99% of Schools in the Divsion have their
SLAC & INSET submitted, reviewed and
approved
3 75-84% of Schools in the Division have their
SLAC & INSET submitted, reviewed and
approved
2 65-74% of Schools in the Division have their
SLAC & INSET submitted, reviewed and
approved
1 50-64% of Schools in the Division have their
SLAC & INSET submitted, reviewed and
approved
5 100% of the evidence requirements were
compliant to CSC PRIME-HRM maturity level
indicators
4 85-99% of the evidence requirements were
compliant to CSC PRIME-HRM maturity level
indicators
3 75-84% of the evidence requirements were
compliant to CSC PRIME-HRM maturity level
indicators
2 65-74% of the evidence requirements were
compliant to CSC PRIME-HRM maturity level
indicators

3.7 Strengthened employee 3%
morale by recognizing
exemplary initiatives and
practices of teaching and non-
teaching personnel through the
Project PRAISE (I AM CDO
SEAL OF EXCELLENCE)
3.8 Ensured that complaints 2%
against personnel brought
before the Division are acted
upon for non-teaching personnel
and indorsed to the RD for
appropriate action for teaching
personnel.
1 50-64% of the evidence requirements were
compliant to CSC PRIME-HRM maturity level
indicators
5 Crafted & Desiminated a Division
Memorandum to the Field for all employees
(100%) to participate in the search of
Outstanding Employee
4 Crafted & Desiminated a Division
Memorandum to the Field for all employees
(80%) to participate in the search of
Outstanding Employee
3 Crafted & Desiminated a Division
Memorandum to the Field for all employees
(60%) to participate in the search of
Outstanding Employee
2 Crafted & Desiminated a Division
Memorandum to the Field for all employees
(40%) to participate in the search of
Outstanding Employee
1 Crafted & Desiminated a Division
Memorandum to the Field for all employees
(20%) to participate in the search of
Outstanding Employee
5
4
3
2
1
SUBTOTAL

IV. 4.1 Intensified and sustained the 4% 5

RESOURCE implementation of resource
MANAGEME management through effective, 4
NT efficient and economical control
and monitoring of all funds from
all sources throughout the year. 3

4.2 Ensured an updated and 2% 5 100% of Infrastructure projects delivered to

accurate inventory of school the End Users in compliance with the Plans
buildings, education facilities and Technical Specifications
and other properties in the
division within the year.
4 85-99% of Infrastructure projects delivered to
the End Users in compliance with the Plans
and Technical Specifications

3 75-84% of Infrastructure projects delivered to

the End Users in compliance with the Plans
and Technical Specifications

2 65-74% of Infrastructure projects delivered to

the End Users in compliance with the Plans
and Technical Specifications
 1 50-64% of Infrastructure projects delivered to
the End Users in compliance with the Plans
and Technical Specifications

4.3 Ensured timely 2% 5

implementation of programs and
projects through effective and 4
efficient procurement process
adhering to existing rules and
3
regulations.

4.4 Reinforced the resources of 2% 5

the Schools for priority programs
and projects through effective
collaboration with the Local 4
School Boards (LSB) in the
approval and implementation of
budget proposals. 3

SUBTOTAL

V. 5.1 Enhanced amd 5% 5 100% of the 109 schools have presented at

PARTNERSH strengthened the provision of least five (5) of the Deed of Donations / MOA
IP AND schools' resources thru
LINKAGES mobilizing support/assistance
and linkages from various
education stakeholders.
V. 5.1 Enhanced amd
PARTNERSH strengthened the provision of
IP AND schools' resources thru
LINKAGES mobilizing support/assistance
and linkages from various
education stakeholders.
5.2 Intensified proper
coordination relative to disaster
risk reduction through efficient
communication and linkage
among CDO City Disaster Risk
Reduction Management Council
agencies and other
stakeholders.
5.3 Enhanced acquisition of
adequate resources of schools
and learning centers by
strengthening and sustaining
relationships and collaboration
with the Local Government Unit
(LGU), NGO and NGA and other
stakeholders to support special
programs and projects of the
division.
SUBTOTAL
VI. OTHER 6.1 Ensured performance of
TASKS other functions as may be
assigned by higher office.
SUBTOTAL
GRAND
TOTAL
5%
4 85-99% of the 109 schools have presented at
least fiveof(5)theof109
the schools
Deed of have
Donations / MOAat
3 75-84% presented
2 least five
65-74 % of(5)theof 109
the Deed of Donations
schools / MOA
have presented
1 at least five
50-64% of the(5)109
of the Deed have
schools of Donations / at
presented
MOA five (5) of the Deed of Donations / MOA
least
2% 5 Coordinated with 5 or more agencies or
stakeholders
4 Coordinated with 4 agencies or stakeholders
3 Coordinated with 3 agencies or stakeholders
2 Coordinated with 2 agencies or stakeholders
1 Coordinated with 1 agency or stakeholder
2% 5 Generated at least 10 Million Pesos in cash
or in kind from external stakeholders
4 Generated at least 8 Million Pesos in cash or
in kind from external stakeholders
3 Generated at least 6 Million Pesos in cash or
in kind from external stakeholders
2 Generated at least 4 Million Pesos in cash or
in kind from external stakeholders
1 Generated at least 2 Million Pesos in cash or
in kind from external stakeholders
5% 5
4
100%
MITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

N DURING PLANNING
Key Performance Indicators
EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
100% of programs and initiatives in the
DEDP are implemented

85-99% of programs and initiatives in the

DEDP are implemented

75-84% of programs and initiatives in the

DEDP are implemented

65-74% of programs and initiatives in the

DEDP are implemented

50-64% of programs and initiatives in the

DEDP are implemented

Conducted District/Division MEA in 4

quarters

Conducted District/Division MEA in 3

quarters

Conducted District/Division MEA in 2

quarters

Conducted District/Division MEA in 1 quarter

District/Division MEA not conducted

Published 10 basic education research Reviewed all the Research Proposals 5 days
anchored on the key thematic areas in the before the deadline
peer-reviewed journal

Presented 10 basic education research Reviewed all the Research Proposals on

anchored on the key thematic areas in the time
international conference

Presented 10 basic education research Reviewed all the Research Proposals 1 day
anchored on the key thematic areas in the after the deadline
national conference

Presented 10 basic education research Reviewed all the Research Proposals 2

anchored on the key thematic areas in the days after the deadline
regional conference

Presented 10 basic education research Reviewed all the Research Proposals 3

anchored on the key thematic areas in the days after the deadline
division conference

10% of the schools were validated by the RO 100% of the schools were assessed and
validated within the year

8% of the schools were validated by the RO 85-99% of the schools were assessed and
validated within the year

6% of the schools were validated by the RO 75-84% of the schools were assessed and
validated within the year

4% of the schools were validated by the RO 65-74% of the schools were assessed and
validated within the year
2% of the schools were validated by the RO 50-64% of the schools were assessed and
validated within the year

100% ensured efficient flow of 100% ensured efficient flow of

communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the resources
allocated
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the period prescribed
by various legal issuances
85-99%% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the resources
allocated
75-84% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the resources
allocated
65-74% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the resources
allocated
50-64% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the resources
allocated
85-99% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the period prescribed
by various legal issuances
75-84% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the period prescribed
by various legal issuances.
65-74% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the period prescribed
by various legal issuances
50-64% ensured efficient flow of
communication within the division and to the
schools. In compliance to rules and
regulations of Records manangement for the
(# of schools). within the period prescribed
by various legal issuances

100% of 222 public schools and private Submitted and validated 100% of 222 public
schools/ implementing units validated by DO schools and private schools/ implementing
units 5 days before the deadline

85-99% of 222 public schools and private Submitted and validated 85-99% of 222
schools/ implementing units validated by DO public schools and private schools/
implementing units on time
75-84% of 222 public schools and private Submitted and validated 75-84% of 222
schools/ implementing units validated by DO public schools and private schools/
implementing units 1 day after the deadline
65-74% of 222 public schools and private Submitted and validated 65-74% of 222
schools/ implementing units validated by DO public schools and private schools/
implementing units 2 days after the deadline

50-64% of 222 public schools and private Submitted and validated 50-64% of 222
schools/ implementing units validated by DO public schools and private schools/
implementing units 3 days after the deadline

100% of 125 schools have conducted the 5

activities and all the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement. within the year
85-99% of 125 schools have conducted the
5 activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement within the year
 75-84% of 125 schools have conducted the
5 activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement
65-74% of 125within thehave
schools year conducted the
5 activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement
50-64% of 125within thehave
schools year conducted the
5 activities and the schools were given
technical assistance and capacity
enhancement within the year
All 125 schools implemented the 6 flagship
programs within the school year

Out of 125 schools 85-99% implemented the

6 flagship programs within the school year

Out of 125 schools 75-84% implemented the

6 flagship programs within the school year

Out of 125 schools 65-74% implemented the

6 flagship programs within the school year

Out of 125 schools 50-64% implemented the

6 flagship programs within the school year

100% of the identified TA needs were Provision of TA is done in 4 quarters

addressed

85-99% of the identified TA needs were Provision of TA is done in 3 quarters

addressed

74-84% of the identified TA needs were Provision of TA is done in 2 quarters

addressed

65-74% of the identified TA needs were Provision of TA is done in 1 quarter

addressed

50-64% of the identified TA needs were TA was not provided

addressed
100% of the identified TA needs were
addressed
85-99% of the identified TA needs were
addressed
74-84% of the identified TA needs were
addressed
65-74% of the identified TA needs were
addressed
50-64% of the identified TA needs were
addressed
100% of programs, projects, and activities
were effectively implemented.
80% of programs, projects, and activities
were effectively implemented.
60% of programs, projects, and activities
were effectively implemented.
40% of programs, projects, and activities
were effectively implemented.
20% of programs, projects, and activities
were effectively implemented.
Provision of TA is done in 4 quarters
Provision of TA is done in 3 quarters
Provision of TA is done in 2 quarters
Provision of TA is done in 1 quarter
TA was not provided
Programs, projects, and activities were done
at least once in all 4 quarters.
Programs, projects, and activities were done
at least once during the 3 quarters.
Programs, projects, and activities were done
at least once during the 2 quarters.
A program, project, or activitiy was
conducted.
No programs, projects, nor activities were
conducted.
100% of operating private schools have
renewed permit to operate and FLO permit
at least 5 days prior to school opening
85-99% of operating private schools have
renewed permit to operate and FLO permit
at least 5 days prior to school opening
75-84% of operating private schools have
renewed permit to operate and FLO permit
at least 5 days prior to school opening
65-74% of operating private schools have
renewed permit to operate and FLO permit
at least 5 days prior to school opening
50-64% of operating private schools have
renewed permit to operate and FLO permit
at least 5 days prior to school opening
 100% of the identified programs were
delivered through the realization of learning
competencies per quarter,division and
school initiated curricular activities.
85-99% of the identified programs were
delivered through the realization of learning
competencies per quarter,division and
school initiated curricular activities.
75-84% of the identified programs were
delivered through the realization of learning
competencies per quarter,division and
school initiated curricular activities.
65-74% of the identified programs were
delivered through the realization of learning
competencies per quarter,division and
school initiated curricular activities.
50-64% of the identified programs were
delivered through the realization of learning
competencies per quarter,division and
school initiated curricular activities.

100% of the schools utilized any of the 100% of the schools submitted output after
various reading initiatives: "I Hear Kids the ulitizatilization of the reading initiatives.
Read, "Read O'clock", "Project KISS ni
Momshie", " i-READ."
85-99% of the schools utilized any of the 85-99% of the schools submitted output after
various reading initiatives: "I Hear Kids the ulitizatilization of the reading initiatives.
Read, "Read O'clock", "Project KISS ni
Momshie", " i-READ."
75-84% of the schools utilized any of the 75-84% of the schools submitted output after
various reading initiatives: "I Hear Kids the ulitizatilization of the reading initiatives.
Read, "Read O'clock", "Project KISS ni
Momshie", " i-READ."
65-74% of the schools utilized any of the 65-74% of the schools submitted output after
various reading initiatives: "I Hear Kids the ulitizatilization of the reading initiatives.
Read, "Read O'clock", "Project KISS ni
Momshie", " i-READ."
50-64% and below of the schools utilized 50-64% of the schools submitted output after
any of the various reading initiatives: "I Hear the ulitizatilization of the reading initiatives.
Kids Read, "Read O'clock", "Project KISS ni
Momshie", " i-READ."

100% of 109 schools/learning centers supplementary learning resources will be

accessed the radio and video lessons via sent to the learning partner stations 5 days
local stations, division learning resource before the airing schedule
portal and cdo learning channel (youtube
and deped tayo)

85-99% of 109 schools/learning centers supplementary learning resources will be

accessed the radio and video lessons via sent to the learning partner stations 4 days
local stations, division learning resource before the airing schedule
portal and cdo learning channel (youtube
and deped tayo)
75-84% of 109 schools/learning centers
accessed the radio and video lessons via
local stations, division learning resource
portal and cdo learning channel (youtube
and deped tayo)
65-74% of 109 schools/learning centers
accessed the radio and video lessons via
local stations, division learning resource
portal and cdo learning channel (youtube
and deped tayo)
50-64% of 109 schools/learning centers
accessed the radio and video lessons via
local stations, division learning resource
portal and cdo learning channel (youtube
and deped tayo)
100% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the validated, contextualized,
localized and indigenized materials in 8
learning areas or 10 support educational
programs
85-99% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the validated, contextualized,
localized and indigenized materials in 8
learning areas or 10 support educational
programss
supplementary learning resources will be
sent to the learning partner stations 3 days
before the airing schedule
supplementary learning resources will be
sent to the learning partner stations 2 days
before the airing schedule
supplementary learning resources will be
sent to the learning partner stations 1 day
before the airing schedule
100% of schools has COMPLETE report in
CMSS for all Grading periods
85-99% of schools has COMPLETE report in
CMSS for all Grading periods
75-84% of schools has COMPLETE report in
CMSS for all Grading periods
65-74% of schools has COMPLETE report in
CMSS for all Grading periods
50-64% of schools has COMPLETE report in
CMSS for all Grading periods
The validated, contextualized, localized and
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or
10 support educational programs are
submitted 5 days before the deadline
The validated, contextualized, localized and
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or
10 support educational programs are
submitted on time
75-84% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the validated, contextualized,
localized and indigenized materials in 8
learning areas or 10 support educational
programs
65-74% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the validated, contextualized,
localized and indigenized materials in 8
learning areas or 10 support educational
programs
50-64% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the validated, contextualized,
localized and indigenized materials in 8
learning areas or 10 support educational
programs
The validated, contextualized, localized and
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or
10 support educational programs are
submitted 1 day after the deadline
The validated, contextualized, localized and
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or
10 support educational programs are
submitted 2 days after the deadline
The validated, contextualized, localized and
indigenized materials in 8 learning areas or
10 support educational programs are
submitted 3 days after the deadline

100% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the quality assured and developed
local curriculum materials via division
learning resource portal and other learning
channel
The quality assured and developed local
curriculum materials are submitted 5 days
before the deadline

85-99% of 109 schools/learning centers The quality assured and developed local
utilized the quality assured and developed curriculum materials are submitted on time
local curriculum materials via division
learning resource portal and other learning
channel
75-84% of 109 schools/learning centers The quality assured and developed local
utilized the quality assured and developed curriculum materials are submitted 1 day
local curriculum materials via division after the deadline
learning resource portal and other learning
channel
65-74% of 109 schools/learning centers The quality assured and developed local
utilized the quality assured and developed curriculum materials are submitted 2 days
local curriculum materials via division after the deadline
learning resource portal and other learning
channel

50-64% of 109 schools/learning centers
utilized the validated, contextualized,
localized and indigenized materials in 8
learning areas or 10 support educational
programs
The quality assured and developed local
curriculum materials are submitted 3 days
after the deadline
100% of private schools were compliant to Private School monitoring was conducted in
regulatory requirements (permits and 4 quarters
reports).
85-99% of private schools were compliant to Private School monitoring was conducted in
regulatory requirements (permits and 3 quarters
reports).
75-84% of private schools were compliant to Private School monitoring was conducted in
regulatory requirements (permits and 2 quarters
reports).
65-74% of private schools were compliant to Private School monitoring was conducted in
regulatory requirements (permits and 1 quarters
reports).
50-64% of private schools were compliant to Private School monitoring was not
regulatory requirements (permits and conducted
reports).

E lementary and secondary school were

provided Technical Assistance (TA) based
on their modalities for 4 quarters
Elementary and secondary school were
provided Technical Assistance (TA) based
on their modalities offered for 3 quarters only

Elementary and secondary school were

provided Technical Assistance (TA) based
on their modalities offered for 2 quarters only

Elementary and secondary school were

provided Technical Assistance (TA) based
on their modalities offered for 1 quarter only

No Technical Assistance (TA) provided

based on their modalities.

100% all processed applications has no
corrections as to completeness of
documents
85-99% all processed applications has no
corrections as to completeness of
documents
75-84% all processed applications has no
corrections as to completeness of
documents
65-74% all processed applications has no
corrections as to completeness of
documents
50-64% all processed applications has no
corrections as to completeness of
documents
Conducted mentoring/coaching,
performance evaluation and recognition to
100% of personnel
Conducted mentoring/coaching,
performance evaluation and recognition to
85-99% of personnel
100% compliant to CSC rules and
regulations and Deped issuances on
Personnel Action within the prescribed
period
85-99% compliant to CSC rules and
regulations and Deped issuances on
Personnel Action within the pprescribed
period
75-84% compliant to CSC rules and
regulations and Deped issuances on
Personnel Action within the prescribed
period
65-74% compliant to CSC rules and
regulations and Deped issuances on
Personnel Action within the prescribed
period
50-64% compliant to CSC rules and
regulations and Deped issuances on
Personnel Action within the peprescribed
period
All applications received for leave are
processed within 3 days, ERF within 5 days
& retirement within 5 days
All applications received for leave are
processed within 5 days, ERF within 7 days
& retirement within 7 days
All applications received for leave are
processed within 7 days, ERF within 9 days
& retirement within 9 days
All applications received for leave are
processed within 9 days, ERF within 11 days
& retirement within 11 days
All applications received for leave are
processed within 10 days, ERF within 13
days & retirement within13 days
100% of the personnel were mentored,
evaluated and given recognition within the
rating period.
85-99% of the personnel were mentored,
evaluated and given recognition within the
rating period.
Conducted mentoring/coaching,
performance evaluation and recognition to
75-84% of personnel
Conducted mentoring/coaching,
performance evaluation and recognition to
65-74% of personnel
Conducted mentoring/coaching,
performance evaluation and recognition to
50-64% and below of personnel
100% of the division personnel are trained
85-99% of the division personnel are trained
75-84% of the division personnel are trained
65-74% of the division personnel are trained
50-64% of the division personnel are trained
Schools have conducted 2 INSET & at least 100% of Schools in the Division have
10 or more SLACS conducted summer/mid-year SLAC &
monthly INSET
Schools have conducted 2 INSET & 8
SLACS
Schools have conducted 2 INSET & 6
SLACS
Schools have conducted 2 INSET & 4
SLACS
Schools have conducted 2 INSET & 2
SLACS
Submitted documents for application to CSC
Prepared complete documents
Initial documentation of key office processes
SDO undergone Orientation by CSC
75-84% of the personnel were mentored,
evaluated and given recognition within the
rating period.
65-74% of the personnel were mentored,
evaluated and given recognition within the
rating period.
50-64% and below of the personnel were
mentored, evaluated and given recognition
within the rating period.
100% of trainings are conducted as
scheduled based on various issuances
85-99% of trainings are conducted as
scheduled based on various issuances
75-84% of trainings are conducted as
scheduled based on various issuances
65-74% of trainings are conducted as
scheduled based on various issuances
50-64% of trainings are conducted as
scheduled based on various issuances
85-99% of Schools in the Division have
conducted summer/mid-year SLAC &
monthly INSET
75-84% of Schoolsvin the have conducted
summer/mid-year SLAC & monthly INSET
65-74% of Schools in the Division have
conducted summer/mid-year SLAC &
monthly INSET
50-64% of Schools in the have conducted
summer/mid-year SLAC & monthly INSET
Conceptualized plan for PRIME HRM
accreditation

100% of the schools in the Division have 50% of Division entries are choosen as
participated in the division search for winners in the Regional Search for
Outstanding employee Outstanding Employees

80% of the schools in the Division have 40% of Division entries are choosen as
participated in the division search for winners in the Regional Search for
Outstanding employee Outstanding Employees

60% of the schools in the Division have 30% of Division entries are choosen as
participated in the division search for winners in the Regional Search for
Outstanding employee Outstanding Employees

40% of the schools in the Division have 20% of Division entries are choosen as
participated in the division search for winners in the Regional Search for
Outstanding employee Outstanding Employees

20% of the schools in the Division have 10% of Division entries are choosen as
participated in the division search for winners in the Regional Search for
Outstanding employee Outstanding Employees

100% of the complaints had been acted

upon
85-99% of the complaints had been acted
upon
75-84% of the complaints had been acted
upon
65-74% of the complaints had been acted
upon
50-64% of the complaints had been acted
upon
Budget utilization and CA liquidation rates
increased to 100%;
Budget utilization and CA liquidation rates
increased to 85-99%
Budget utilization and CA liquidation
increased to 75-84%
Budget utilization and CA liquidation rates
increased to 65-74%
Budget utilization and CA liquidation rates
increased to 50%
100% of Infrastructure Projects closely 100% of Infrastructure Projects turned-over
monitored; Installed materials were properly to the end user within the specified Contract
checked and recommended other solutions Duration
to avoid the delay of the projects.

85-99% of Infrastructure Projects closely 85-99% of Infrastructure Projects turned-

monitored; Installed materials were properly over to the end user within the specified
checked and recommended other solutions Contract Duration
to avoid the delay of the projects.

75-84% of Infrastructure Projects closely 75-84% of Infrastructure Projects turned-

monitored; Installed materials were properly over to the end user within the specified
checked and recommended other solutions Contract Duration
to avoid the delay of the projects.

65-74% of Infrastructure Projects closely 65-74% of Infrastructure Projects turned-

monitored; Installed materials were properly over to the end user within the specified
checked and recommended other solutions Contract Duration
to avoid the delay of the projects.
50-64% of Infrastructure Projects closely 50-64% of Infrastructure Projects turned-
monitored; Installed materials were properly over to the end user within the specified
checked and recommended other solutions Contract Duration
to avoid the delay of the projects.

Goods and services were procured 5 days

before the implementation of PPAs
Goods and services were procured 4 days
before the implementation of PPAs
Goods and services were procured 3 days
before the implementation of PPAs
Goods and services were procured 2 days
before the implementation of PPAs
Goods and services were procured 1 day
before the implementation of PPAs
100% of the budget proposals were
approved by the LSB and implemented in
the schools.
85-99% of the budget proposals were
approved by the LSB and implemented in
the schools.
75-84% of the budget proposals were
approved by the LSB and implemented in
the schools.
65-74% of the budget proposals were
approved by the LSB and implemented in
the schools.
50-64% of the budget proposals were
approved by the LSB and implemented in
the schools.

100% of the 109 schools have submitted 100% of the 109 schools have presented at
Brigada Reports (DPDS) least five (5) of the accomplished and
completely signed DOD or MOA
85-99 % of the 109 schools have submitted 85-99% of the 109 schools have presented
Brigada
75-84% Reports (DPDS)
of the 109 Schools have submitted at least five
75-84% (5) 109
of the of theschools
accomplished and
have presented
Brigada%Reports
65-74 (DPDS)
of the 109 schools have submitted completely
at least five
65-74% signed
(5)109
of the DOD
of the or MOA
accomplished
schools and
have presented
Brigada Reports
50-64% (DPDS)
of the 109 schools have submitted completely
at least five
50-64% signed
(5)109
of the DOD
of the or MOA
accomplished
schools and
have presented
Brigada Reports (DPDS) completely
at least fivesigned DOD
(5) of the or MOA and
accomplished
Conducted DRRM activities to schools in completely
Coordinatedsigned
with 5DOD or MOA
or more agencies or
partnership with 5 agencies/stockholders stakeholders within the year
Conducted DRRM activities to schools in Coordinated with 4 agencies stakeholders
partnership with 4 agencies/stockholders within the year
Conducted DRRM activities to schools in Coordinated with 3 agencies or stakeholders
partnership with 3 agencies/stockholders within the year
Conducted DRRM activities to schools in Coordinated with 2 agencies or stakeholders
partnership with 2 agencies/stockholders within the year
Conducted DRRM activities to schools in Coordinated with 1 agency or stakeholder
partnership with 1 agency/stockholder within the year

Accomplished 5 tasks delegated by higher

office.
Accomplished 4 tasks delegated by higher
office.
Accomplished 3 tasks delegated by higher
office.
Accomplished 2 tasks delegated by higher
office.
Accomplished 1 tasks delegated by higher
office.

Qualitative Description