You are on page 1of 29

Rigorous Curriculum Design

Presented by
Larry Ainsworth
The Leadership and Learning Center
Englewood, Colorado
www.LeadandLearn.com
Toll--Free 1
Toll 1--866
866--399
399--6019

The Common Core State Standards–


Insufficient By Themselves

“To be effective in improving education


and getting all students ready for
college workforce training,
college, training and life
life, the
Common Core State Standards must be
partnered with a content-rich
curriculum and robust assessments,
both aligned to the Standards.”
CCSSI Webinar, 2010

Rigorous Curriculum Design

How to Create Curricular Units of


Studyy that Align
g Standards,,
Instruction, and Assessment

Book and Seminar Published 2010


Lead + Learn Press
Englewood, Colorado

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-1
A Curriculum Model That Provides
The What, Why, and How
1. What do ALL students need to know and be
able to do? Standards
2. How do we teach so that all students will
learn? Instruction
3. How will we know if they have
learned it? Assessment
4. What will we do if they don’t know or if they
come to us already knowing? Differentiation
DuFour and Eaker
and Enrichment
Professional Learning Communities At Work (1998)

A Curriculum Roadmap

— An overview of a
do-it-yourself
process that
curriculum design
teams can follow—
over time—to
create a rigorous
curriculum in any
content area

JANUARY, 2010
“Your process is going great! We
are enjoying every moment of our
work (if you can call it ‘work’). Our
first eight documents are
comprehensive clear
comprehensive, clear, and all very
strongly based on the standards.
Curriculum makes so much sense
now!”
BONNIE FINEMAN
East Hartford High School
Curriculum Design Team

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-2
“Unwrapping” the
Priority Standards, Big Common
Standards Ideas, Essential Formative
and Questions Assessments
Supporting (Pre- and
Standards Post-)
A
The Data
Th D t Comprehensive F
Frequentt
Teams Model Progress
Process Monitoring
Checks
High-Impact
Instructional Authentic
Strategies Performance Tasks &
Scoring Guides

Four Parts of Rigorous


Curriculum Design Model

Big Picture
Building the
Connections
Foundation

Designing the
Units of Study
Implementing
the Units

PartOne

SEETHE“BIGPICTURE”FIRST

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-3
Part 1: Making Connections
Connecting
Curriculum
Design to the
What Is “Big Picture”
Rigorous
Curriculum
Design?

Overview of
Design
Sequence

Rigor
Defined

Rigor refers to a level of difficulty and


the ways in which students apply their
knowledge through higher
higher-order
order
thinking skills. Rigor also means the
reaching for a higher level of quality in
both effort and outcome.

Rigorous Curriculum
Defined

A rigorous curriculum is an inclusive


set of intentionally aligned
components—clear
t l learning
l i outcomes
t
with matching assessments, engaging
learning experiences, and instructional
strategies—organized into sequenced
units of study.

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-4
Rigorous Curriculum
Defined

A rigorous curriculum serves as both


the detailed road map and the high-
quality delivery system for ensuring that
all students achieve the desired end: the
attainment of their designated grade- or
course-specific standards within a
particular content area.

Curriculum Big
g
Design Picture

State Assessments; National Assessments


Common Formative
Common Formative Post-
Post-
Assessment &
Assessment & Data
Data Teams
Teams Process
Process

Rigorous Curricular
Effective
Effective Teaching
Teaching Unit of Study Enrichment,
Enrichment,
Strategies
Strategies with
with Based On Remediation,
Remediation,
Progress
Progress “Unwrapped’ Intervention
Intervention Prior
Prior to
to
Monitoring
Monitoring Checks
Checks Priority CCSS Next
Next Curricular
Curricular Unit
Unit

Common
CommonFormative
FormativePre-
Pre-
Assessment
Assessment&&Data
DataTeams
Teams
Process
Process

Scope, Sequencing, and Pacing of


Curricular Units

PRIORITY CCSS and Supporting CCSS

Common Core State Standards

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-5
The Big Picture Connections

— Which of the
“pieces”
pieces are
already in place
in your school
system?

Progress Check
™Where are you now?
____________________________________
____________________________________
™Which “big picture” practices are
already
l d in
i place?
l ?
____________________________________
____________________________________
™What should your next steps be?
____________________________________
_________________________________

Overview of Part 2:
Building the Curricular Foundation

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-6
Part Two

Building the
Foundation for
Designing
Curricular
Units

Five Sequential Steps

Building the
Foundation

1. Prioritize the Standards

Common Core
State Standards

CCSS are presented


in the context of
Priority Standards in
Chapter 5, pp. 47-53.

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-7
FEWER, CLEARER,
HIGHER

“The question of national standards is


inescapable. The U.S. needs fewer,
clearer, and higher national standards.”

Sir Michael Barber in interview with A. Klein,


Education Week, September 24, 2008, p. 24.

Are There Fewer?

Counting
The CCSS

Priority Standards
Defined

Priority Standards are a carefully selected


subset of the total list of the grade-specific
and course-specific
course specific standards within each
content area that students must know and be
able to do by the end of each school year in
order to be prepared to enter the next grade
level or course.

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-8
Supporting Standards
Defined

Supporting standards are those standards


that support, connect to, or enhance the
Priority Standards.
Standards They are taught within the
context of the Priority Standards, but do not
receive the same degree of instruction and
assessment emphasis as do the Priority
Standards.

Prioritization, Not Elimination!

• All grade-level or course-specific


standards are not equal in importance!
• Prioritize those standards by
distinguishing those that are essential
from those that are supporting.
• Teach the supporting standards in the
context of or in relation to the
essentials.

Priority Standards and


Supporting Standards
Priority
™Like fence posts, Priority Standards
Standards provide curricular (Essential)
focus in which teachers need
to “dig
dig deeper”
deeper and assure
student competency.

™Like fence rails, “Supporting Supporting


Standards
Standards” are curricular
standards which connect to
and support the Priority
Standards.

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-9
Two Standards:
One Post, One Rail

CC.5.R.I.3 Explain the relationships or


interactions between two or more
individuals, events, ideas, or concepts in a
historical, scientific, or technical text based
on specific information in the text.
CC.5.R.I.1 Quote accurately from a text
when explaining what the text says
explicitly and when drawing inferences from
the text.

HelpfulTip

When considering whether to


select one standard over another,
determine which one is the more
comprehensive or rigorous.

“If students could do this one,


that would take care of this
other one.”

Priority Standards

Readiness Endurance
(for next level (concepts and
skills that last
learning)
over time))

External Leverage
Exams (crossover
(national, application to
state, other areas)
college,
career)

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-10
Priority Standards Steps

Step 1: Make initial selections.


Step 2: Look for connections to state tests.
Step 3: Chart selections for each grade.
Step 4: Vertically align standards K-12.
Step 5: Acquire feedback, revise, publish.
Step 6: Provide professional development.

Progress Check
™Where are you now?
____________________________________
____________________________________
™Is your school district or state ready to
prioritize
i iti theth Common
C Core?
C ?
____________________________________
____________________________________
™What should your next steps be?
____________________________________
_________________________________

Building the
Foundation

2. Name the Units of Study

1. Prioritize the CCSS

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-11
Unit of Study
Defined
A series of specific lessons, learning
experiences, and related
assessments—based
assessments based on designated
Priority Standards and related
supporting standards—for a topical,
skills-based, or thematic focus that may
last anywhere from two to six weeks.

TOPICAL Units of Study


Focus on a specific portion of
a larger subject or discipline.

Topical Examples

S i
Science: S lid and
Solids d Liquids
Li id

Math: Estimation

Reading: Story Elements

SKILLS-BASED Units of Study


Emphasize Application

Skills-Based Examples
Converting
g Fractions to
Decimals

Making Text Connections

Editing and Revising

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-12
THEMATIC Units of Study
Emphasize connections to other topics within the
same discipline or to completely different disciplines

Thematic Examples

S i
Science: Lif Cycles
Life C l

Social Studies: Impact of War

Visual Arts: Art and Multimedia

Building the
Foundation

3. Assign the Standards

2. Name the Units of Study

1. Prioritize the CCSS

Assign the Standards—


Priority and Supporting
™ Determine the appropriate number of
Priority Standards for each unit based
on their cognitive difficulty – average
is three or four.
™ Distribute Priority Standards across
multiple units as long as it makes
instructional sense to do so.

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-13
Building the
Foundation

4. Prepare a Pacing Calendar

3. Assign the Standards

2. Name the Units of Study

1. Prioritize the CCSS

Pacing Calendar
Defined

A pacing calendar is a yearlong (or


course-long)
g) schedule for delivering
g all
of the planned units of study for a
designated grade level or course, not
the instructional materials used within
those units.

Pacing Calendar
Defined

A pacing calendar helps ensure that


students learn the Priority Standards
and related supporting standards in
the right order through instructional
“building blocks” or learning
progressions (Popham, 2007).

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-14
Pacing Calendar
Defined

“A carefully planned pacing calendar


provides suggested horizontal learning
progressions within grades and
courses and suggested vertical
learning progressions between grades
and courses. (Ainsworth, 2010).”

Building the
Foundation
5. Construct Unit Planning Organizer

4. Prepare a Pacing Calendar

3. Assign the Standards

2. Name the Units of Study

1. Prioritize the CCSS

Brainstorm The Elements

What Key
Components
Does a Unit
Organizer
Need to
Include?

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-15
46

See The Design Format

Unit Planning
Organizer
g

A Universal Template
For Creating
Each of the Curricular
Units of Study

Rigorous Curriculum Design


Planners

Assessment
Planner

Weekly Unit Engaging


and Daily Planning Learning
Planners Organizer Experiences

Details
Organizer

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-16
Overview of Part 3:
Designing the Curricular Unit of Study

Part Three

DESIGNING THE
CURRICULAR UNIT
OF STUDY

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-17
Design the Curricular Unit –
Twelve Sequential Steps

1. “Unwrap”
P i it
Priority
Standards 4. Create End-
3. Decide of-Unit Post-
Big Ideas & Assessment
Essential
2. Create Questions
Graphic
Organizer

Design the Curricular Unit –


Twelve Sequential Steps

1. “Unwrap”
P i it
Priority
Standards 4. Create End-
3. Decide of-Unit Post-
Big Ideas & Assessment
Essential
2. Create Questions
Graphic
Organizer

Step 4:
Create the
End-of-Unit
Assessment

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-18
Selected-Response: Multiple-Choice
Question is directly matched to “unwrapped”
concept, skill, and level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Level 2—RECOGNIZE (main idea)

zStudent Directions: Choose the best


answer from the answer choices.
1.What
Wh t is
i the
th main i idea
id off this
thi tale?
t l ? (Level
(L l 2)
a. Two frogs accidentally jumped into a
pail of milk.
b. The little frog lived because he didn’t
give up.
c. Milk can be churned into butter with
enough effort.
55

Selected-Response: Multiple-Choice
Question is directly matched to “unwrapped”
concept, skill, and level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Level 4—DRAW (inferences, conclusions,
generalizations)

This tale best illustrates which one of the


following generalizations: (Level 4)
a. Danger can show up in the most
ordinary places.
b. Events sometimes take a surprising
turn if you refuse to quit.
c. Everyone fails some of the time.

Extended-Response Question directly matched


to “unwrapped” concept, skill, and level of
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Level 5—SUPPORT (inferences, conclusions
with text evidence, prior knowledge)

Write one or more p paragraphs


g p defending g
your answer choice for the multiple-choice
question above. State your choice and three
reasons to support it, using examples from
the folktale. Write a concluding sentence to
summarize or support your choice. (Level 5)

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-19
Scoring Guide
Goal
ܽ States answer choice
ܽ Supports answer choice with
three examples from tale
ܽ Writes one or more paragraphs
ܽ Writes concluding sentence that
summarizes or supports answer
choice
Create the Remaining Levels of the Scoring Guide:
Advanced, Progressing, Beginning

Design the Curricular Unit –


Twelve Sequential Steps

5. Create Pre-
Assessment 8 G
8. Gather
th
7. Plan Instructional
Engaging Resource
Learning Materials
Experiences

6. Identify Vocabulary,
Interdisciplinary
Connections, 21st Century
Learning Skills

Design the Curricular Unit –


Twelve Sequential Steps

5. Create Pre-
Assessment 8. G
8 Gather
th
7. Plan Instructional
Engaging Resource
Learning Materials
Experiences

6. Identify Vocabulary,
Interdisciplinary
Connections, 21st Century
Learning Skills

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-20
Design the Curricular Unit –
Twelve Sequential Steps

5. Create Pre-
Assessment 8. G
8 Gather
th
7. Plan Instructional
Engaging Resource
Learning Materials
Experiences

6. Identify Vocabulary,
Interdisciplinary
Connections, 21st
Century Learning Skills

Step 7:
Plan
Engaging
Learning
E
Experiences
i

Performance Assessment
Defined

A collection of several related


performance tasks, distributed
th
throughout
h t a unitit off study,
t d that
th t
progressively develop and reveal
student understanding of the
“unwrapped” concepts, skills, and
Big Ideas.

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-21
Engaging Learning Experiences
“Unwrapped”
Concepts and
Performance
Skills
Tasks

Recognize
g Interpret
p Apply
pp y Evaluate
Task 1

Task 4
Task 2

Task 3
List Summarize Model Justify

Describe Compare Analyze Create

Whole and Small-Group Instruction throughout Tasks 1-4


Tasks Increase in Thinking Skill Rigor to
Help Students Discover
Engaging Big Ideas
Scenario

Engaging Scenario
Good news! Your parents have
finally agreed to let you have that new
cell phone. But here’s the catch: You
have to convince them that you’ve done
your homework and found the cell
phone package with the greatest
number of “perks” for the least amount
of cash. To do this, you must analyze
three cell phone packages to determine
the one that best meets your parents’
requirements.

Engaging Scenario
Be prepared to present your
information mathematically in a
persuasive letter that you will write
and deliver to your parents. If you
make
k a strong
t case, anddbbackk it up
with data, you may soon be text-
messaging your friends on your new
phone. Good luck!

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-22
Synopses of Math and Language
Arts Performance Tasks
™ Task One: Create a Venn diagram
representing the features of three
different cell phone packages.
™ T
Taskk Two:
T C t a comparison
Create i
chart showing the cost of each
phone, cost of each package,
number and type of minutes
included, and perks offered by
each cell phone company.

Synopses of Math and Language


Arts Performance Tasks
™ Task Three: Write a summary
essay comparing and contrasting
the pros and cons of each of the
three cell phone types
types.
™ Task Four: Write a persuasive
letter to your parents stating your
choice of cell phone package with
data to support the reasons for
your choice.

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-23
Design the Curricular Unit –
Twelve Sequential Steps

5. Create Pre-
Assessment 8 G
8. Gather
th
7. Plan Instructional
Engaging Resource
Learning Materials
Experiences
6. Identify Vocabulary,
Interdisciplinary
Connections, 21st Century
Learning Skills

Design the Curricular Unit –


Twelve Sequential Steps

9.
Recommend
High-Impact
g p
Instructional
Strategies 11. Create 12. Write
Informal Weekly
Progress Plans;
10. Detail Monitoring
Unit Design
Checks Daily
Planning
Organizer Lessons

Research--
Research
21st Century Based Effective
Learning Skills Teaching
Strategies
English
Language High-Impact
Learner Instructional Differentiation
Differentiation,
Strategies Including
Strategies
Enrichment
Specially
Designed Response to
Instruction Intervention Strategies
(Tiers 1, 2, 3)

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-24
Design the Curricular Unit –
Twelve Sequential Steps

9.
Recommend
High-Impact
g p
Instructional
Strategies 11. Create 12. Write
Informal Weekly
Progress Plans;
10. Detail Monitoring
Unit Design
Checks Daily
Planning
Organizer Lessons

Greater Detail Needed

Sequencing and
Pacing of
Learning
Experiences

Suggested Ways
to Use
Instructional
Strategies

Design the Curricular Unit –


Twelve Sequential Steps

9.
Recommend
g p
High-Impact
Instructional
Strategies 11. Create 12. Write
Informal Weekly
Progress Plans;
10. Detail Monitoring
Unit Design
Checks Daily
Planning
Organizer Lessons

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-25
OLD MODEL
Teach, Teach, Teach,
Teach, Teach, Teach,
Teach, TEST

NEW MODEL

Teach, Assess, Re-Teach,


Assess, Teach, Re-
Assess, Teach, ASSESS,
INTERVENE, ENRICH

76

Step 11:
Progress Monitoring Checks

Administer short, informal progress


monitoring checks that coincide with
learning progressions—the “building
blocks” of instruction—in order to
determine student learning and
differentiate instruction accordingly.

Design the Curricular Unit –


Twelve Sequential Steps

9.
Recommend
g p
High-Impact
Instructional
Strategies 11. Create 12. Write
Informal Weekly
Progress Plans;
10. Detail Monitoring
Unit Design
Checks Daily
Planning
Organizer Lessons

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-26
Implementing
th Unit
the U it off
Study

Analyze Student
Introduce the Data; Decide How
Unit and to Differentiate
Administer Instruction Begin
Pre- Teaching the
Assessment Unit
Implementing
Enrich, Learning-
g
Administer
Ad i i t
Remediate, Centered Frequent
Intervene
Units of Progress
Monitoring
Study
Checks
Administer Post-
Assessment; Evaluate Effectiveness of
Analyze Results Instructional Strategies;
Change as Needed

JUNE, 2010
“I can't wait for you to see our final
product… these units are quite
rich. Our group worked … to make
the curriculum accessible to the
teachers. More importantly, I
believe it is going to be extremely
valuable to our students. As I said
before, it all makes sense now! ”
BONNIE FINEMAN
East Hartford High School
Curriculum Design Team

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-27
FEBRUARY, 2011

“Rigorous Curriculum Design should


be a required course in EVERY teacher
education program in the country.
Without it educators will never see the
whole picture that makes up their
professional career.”
GARY L. SACKET
Aurora Learning Community
Association
Fairview, Oklahoma

Reflection

• What new ideas or insights have you


gained as a result of this preview of
the Rigorous Curriculum Design
model?

• What impact do you see this work


having on instruction and assessment
in your school system and state?

Together We CAN
Make This Work!

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-28
Your Feedback

• Thank you for the opportunity to


present this information to you!
• Please take a few moments
to complete the feedback
form.

• Your comments, insights, and


inquiries are appreciated!

Larry Ainsworth
The Leadership and Learning Center
1.866.399.6019 ext. 509
LAinsworth@LeadandLearn.com
LeadandLearn.com

© 2011 Rigorous Curriculum Design Keynote


All rights reserved. April, 2011
Copy only with permission. Page P-29

You might also like