STANDARD

INDUSTRI
PEMBINAAN
(CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY STANDARD)

CIS 19:2011
QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR
COMPLETED ROAD WORKS

Descriptors: quality of workmanship, road surface, slope & retaining structure, bridge & other
structures, traffic / road furniture, sampling, weightage

© Copyright

LEMBAGA PEMBANGUNAN INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN MALAYSIA

Standard Writing Organisation

CIDB
M A L AYS I A
Lembaga Pembangunan
Industri Pembinaan Malaysia
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MALAYSIA

Ibu Pejabat CIDB, Tingkat 7, Grand Seasons Avenue, No 72, Jalan Pahang, 53000 Kuala Lumpur.
P.O Box. 12278, 50772 Kuala Lumpur, Tel : 603 – 26170200 Fax: 603 – 40437050
http://www.cidb.gov.my
QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR
COMPLETED ROAD WORKS

CIDB
M A L AYS I A
© Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia 2011

CIDB
M A L AYS I A

All enquiries regarding this book should be forwarded to:

Chief Executive
Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia
7th. Floor, Grand Seasons Avenue
No 72, Jalan Pahang
53000 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia

Tel : 603 – 26170200

Fax : 603 – 40437050
Website : www.cidb.gov.my

No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or any means,
whether mechanical or electronic including photocopying and recording without the written
consent of CIDB.

Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Data Pengkatalogan-dalam-Penerbitan

 CONTENTS
Page

Committee representation…………………………………………………… vi
Foreword……………………………………………………………….……… vii

SECTION 1 : GENERAL

1.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………… 1
1.2 Normative references……………………………………………………….. 1

1.3 Definition……………………………………………………………………… 2
1.3.1 QLASSIC……………………………………………………………………... 2
1.3.2 Component…………………………………………………………………… 2
1.3.3 Newly Completed Roads..………………………………………………….. 2
1.3.4 Road Category………………………………………………………………. 2
1.3.5 Elements……………………………………………………………………… 3
1.3.6 QLASSIC Assessor…………………………………………………………. 3
1.3.7 Qualified Person…………………………………………………………….. 4
1.3.8 Approved Standard..………………………………………………………… 4
1.3.9 Tolerance…………………………………………………………………….. 4

Objective of Quality Assessment System for

1.4
Completed Road Works…………………………………………………….. 4

Use of Quality Assessment System for

1.5
Completed Road Works…………………………………………………….. 4

Scope of Quality Assessment System for

1.6
Completed Road Works…………………………………………………….. 5

1.7 Assessment Approach……………………………………………………… 5

SECTION 2 : QUALITY STANDARD

2.1 Components…………………………………………………………………. 6

2.2 Elements……………………………………………………………………… 7

2.3 Defect Groups..……………………………………………………………… 9

SECTION 3 : ASSESSMENT

3.1 Road Weightage…………………………………………………………….. 12

3.2 Sampling……………………………………………………………………… 12

iii
 CONTENTS

Page

3.3 Weightage Guideline for Assessment……………………………….. 14

3.3.1 Road Surface…………………………………………………………… 14
3.3.2 Slope and Retaining Structure……………………………………….. 14
3.3.3 Drainage………………………………………………………………... 14
3.3.4 Bridge and Other Structure…………………………………………… 16
3.3.5 Traffic / Road Furniture……………………………………………….. 17

3.4 Assessment Scoring…………………………………………………… 24

Tables

Table 1 Road Category and Description………………………………………. 2

Table 2 Road Elements by Components..…………………………………….. 3

Table 3 Elements and its Examples……………………………………………. 7

Table 4 Defect Groups for Assessment……………………………………….. 9

Table 5 Road Weightage for All Components………………………………… 12

Table 6 Weightage for Road Surface Elements……………………………… 14

Table 7 Weightage for Drainage……………………………………………….. 15

Table 8 Weightage Guideline for Bridge & Other Structures..………………. 16

Table 9 Weightage for Traffic / Road Furniture Element…...………………... 17

Figures

Figure 1 Typical Road Cross Section........………………………...............….. 10

Figure 2 Typical Bridge Cross Section………................................................ 11

Figure 3 Examples of Road Surface Conditions.…………………………….... 18

Figure 4 Different Types of Road Surface Defects (Aesthetic)....................... 19

Figure 5 Examples of Slope & Retaining Structure Conditions……......…….. 20

Figure 6 Examples of Drainage Conditions…………...………………………... 21

Figure 7 Examples of Bridge & Other Structures Conditions…….........…….. 22

Figure 8 Examples of Traffic/Road Furniture………………….......…………... 23

iv
 CONTENTS

Page
Annexes

A Quality Standards for Road Surface Works………………………….. A1

B Quality Standards for Slope and Retaining Structure Works………. B1

C Quality Standards for Drainage Works……………………………….. C1

D Quality Standards for Bridge and Other Structure Works………….. D1

E Quality Standards for Traffic / Roadside Furniture Works………….. E1

QLASSIC Assessment Form

F
Component 1: Road Surface…………………………………………... F1

QLASSIC Assessment Form

G
Component 2: Slope and Retaining Structures……………………… G1

QLASSIC Assessment Form

H
Component 3: Drainage……………………………………………….. H1

QLASSIC Assessment Form

I1 Component 4: Above Ground Structures: Road/Pedestrian/
Motorcycle Bridge………………………………………………………. I1

QLASSIC Assessment Form

I2
Component 4: Underpass/Vehicular Box Culvert and Tunnel…….. I2

QLASSIC Assessment Form

J
Component 5: Traffic / Roadside Furniture………………………….. J1

K Defect Group For Assessment Of Road Surface Works…………… K1

Defect Group For Assessment Of Slope & Retaining Structures

L L1
Works…………………………………………………………………….

M Defect Group For Assessment Of Drainage Works………………… M1

N Defect Group For Assessment Of Bridge & Other Structure Works N1

O Defect Group For Assessment Of Traffic & Roadside Furniture Works O1

Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………. 64

v
Committee representation

This Construction Industry Standard (CIS) was managed and developed by the Construction
Industry Development Board Malaysia with the assistance of the Technical Committee on Quality
Assessment System for Completed Road Works which comprises representatives from the
following organizations:-

Construction Industry Development Board, Malaysia

Highway Planning Unit, Ministry of Works, Malaysia
Malaysia Highway Authority (LLM)
The Institution of Engineers, Malaysia
The Association of Consulting Engineers, Malaysia
PLUS Expressway Berhad

vi
 FOREWORD

This Malaysian Construction Industry Standard (CIS) hereby referred as CIS 19:2011 was developed
as a quality assessment system for completed road works standard by the Technical Committee
on Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works with the assistance of Construction
Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB) which acted as a moderator and facilitator for the
technical committee throughout the development process of this standard.

Compliance with this document does not in itself confer immunity from legal obligations.

vii
 QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR
COMPLETED ROAD WORKS

SECTION 1: GENERAL
1.1 Introduction

Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works is an independent method to

assess and evaluate the quality of workmanship of newly completed road works based on
this standard.

1.2 Normative References

The following normative reference is indispensable for the application of this construction
industry standard. For dated reference, only the edition cited applies. For undated
reference, the latest edition of the normative reference (including any amendments)
applies.

Specification for Roadworks (JKR/SPJ/2008-S4: Flexible Pavement), Published by JKR

Malaysia.

JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works.

LLM / PLUS Specifications.

Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2D/85, Manual on Traffic Control Devices: Road Marking And
Delineation, Public Work Department Malaysia.

Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2B/85, Manual on Traffic Control Device: Traffic Sign Application.

Guidelines for Road Drainage Design, Published by REAM.

Guideline for Malaysia Toll Expressway System – Design Standard, by Malaysia Highway
Authority (LLM).

Annual Bridge Inspection Manual – Quick Inspection Guideline, by JKR.

A Guide for Bridge Inspection , Published by REAM.

MS 881:Pt1: 1991 Specification for Precast Concrete, SIRIM.

MS 1303:Pt1:1993 Specification for Thermoplastic Road Marking Materials, SIRIM.

MS 164: 1991 Specification for Road Marking Paints, SIRIM.

AS 4058: 1992 Precast Concrete Pipes (pressure and non-pressure).

Highway and Rail Transit Tunnel Inspection Manual, by U.S. Department of

Transportation.

1
1.3 Definition

For the purpose on this Construction Industry Standard the following definitions apply.

1.3.1 QLASSIC

QLASSIC is the acronym for quality assessment system in construction.

1.3.2 Component

A component refers to the physical part which can be found in a road construction project.
For the purpose of this standard the following components are applicable:

i. Road Surface;
ii. Slope and Retaining Structure;
iii. Drainage;
iv. Bridges and Other Structures; and
v. Traffic / Road Furniture

1.3.3 Newly Completed Roads

Newly completed roads are roads which are new, not opened to traffic and as deemed
fit to be assessed by the Consultant. Ideally, this road has already been assessed in
terms of its adherence to design specifications. The Consultant shall mean the Main
Design and Supervision Consultant for the road project.

Newly completed roads exclude additional and/or upgrading works carried out on to an
already completed road.

1.3.4 Road Category

For the purpose of this standard, the roads are divided into five (5) categories as defined
below:
Table 1. Road Category and Description
Road
Description JKR Standard
Category
Include inter-urban expressways and highways where tolls
JKR R6/U6 and
A are collected. Normally these roads are under the
equivalent
jurisdiction of the Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia (LLM).
Include national highways, primary state roads and roads
within Federal Territories. These are inter-urban highways
linking Federal Capitals, State Capitals, points of entry/exit
(i.e. seaports and airports), primary roads forming the
JKR R5/U5 and
B basic network linking State Capitals & major towns and
equivalent
roads within Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan
and Putrajaya. Normally these roads are under the
jurisdiction of the Federal JKR, State JKR or Municipal
Councils.
Include Regional Development Scheme Roads and
Secondary State Roads. These are roads forming the Other than JKR
C network within regional development areas and secondary R6/U6 or JKR
roads within districts. These roads are under the R5/U5
jurisdiction of the Federal or State JKR.

2
 Table 1. Road Category and Description (continued)

Include urban collector roads and urban local streets.

Urban Roads and
D These roads serve as collectors and distributors offering
Highways
direct access to abutting land.
Include minor Federal Roads and roads within the village
Rural and
and rural inhabited area. These roads are under the
E other Federal
jurisdiction of the Federal JKR, local authorities and
Roads
District Offices.

1.3.5 Elements

Elements are the physical parts of a component as specified below:

Table 2. Road Elements by Components

Component Elements
Carriageway
1. Road Surface Shoulder and Verge
Median
Slope
Retaining Structure
2. Slope and Retaining Slope Drainage
Structure Above Ground Services
Slope Furniture

3. Drainage Drain
Drain cover
Sump
Box/pipe culvert
Above Ground Structures
- Road Bridge and Pedestrian
/Motorcycle bridge
4. Bridge & Other Structures Special Structures
- Underpass/Vehicular Box Culvert
(VBC) & Tunnel
Markings
Traffic Calming devices
Traffic Sign
Electrical devices
5. Traffic/Road Furniture Pedestrian facilities
Kerb
Traffic Barrier
Delineators

1.3.6 QLASSIC Assessor

The QLASSIC assessor must have attended the QLASSIC Assessors Certification
Training certified by CIDB before carrying out the assessment.

3
The QLASSIC assessor shall be continuously updated with the latest QLASSIC practices
to ensure consistency and effective implementation of this standard.

1.3.7 Qualified Person

A qualified person is defined as the Superintending Officer (S.O.) or as defined by the

project contract.

1.3.8 Approved Standard

Approved standard shall mean this CIS standard specified by the qualified person for the
project.

1.3.9 Tolerance

Tolerance shall mean acceptable deviations or permissible values that do not compromise
the quality of workmanship. Where applicable, the tolerances are adopted from the
normative references.

1.4 Objectives of Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works.

Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works was designed and developed to
enable the user to achieve all/any of the following objectives:

a) to benchmark the level of quality of the road construction industry in Malaysia;

b) to have a standard quality assessment system for workmanship quality of

completed road works;

c) to assess the workmanship quality of a completed road works based on the

approved standards;

d) to evaluate the performance of contractors based on the workmanship quality;

e) to encourage continual improvements for contractors; and

f) to compile data for statistical analysis.

1.5 Use of Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works

The Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works is intended to complement
the best engineering practices, contractual drawings and specifications in a project. It is
not intended to be used independently as working specifications.

The qualified person shall not use the Quality Assessment System for Completed Road
Works as a design standard and/or to decide if the road or parts of the road works are in
accordance with the relevant Specifications and by-laws.

It is still the responsibility of the qualified person to ensure that the quality of the
Completed Road Works conform to approved standards, best practices, specifications and
drawings.

Where accessible and practical, all elements identified in this standard shall be assessed.

4
1.6 Scope of Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works

The standard sets out the quality of workmanship for the various aspects of the
construction elements for the general road works. The Quality Assessment System for
Completed Road Works covers five main components: Road Surface, Slope & Retaining
Structure, Drainage, Bridge & Other Structures and Traffic/Road Furniture.

Assessments on the workmanship are carried out based on this standard and marks are
awarded if the workmanship complies with the standards. These marks are then summed
up to give a total score (%) for the road works.

However, the assessment excludes works and tests carried out in pre construction and
during construction works. The road is assessed primarily on workmanship standard
achieved through site inspection and field non-destructive testing.

1.7 Assessment Approach

Assessment of the quality of workmanship is carried out upon completion of the road
project and preferably, before the road is opened to traffic. This is to ensure that any non-
compliance to specific standards is purely based on quality of construction and not from
wear and tear of the completed road. The assessor shall inspect and assess the identified
samples against the standard and tolerance using the tools specified.

Prior to conducting each assessment, the assessor determines the number of samples
and locations to be assessed. The number of samples and locations are selected from
drawings and plans. The selected samples shall be distributed as uniformly as possible
throughout the project length. All locations shall be made available for sample
determination.

The assessment shall only be limited to this pre-determined sample size and location and
is done on the work that is inspected for the first time. Rectification and correction carried
out after the quality assessment will not be re-scored. The objective of this practice is to
encourage contractors towards “doing things right the first time and every time”.

The assessment shall be recorded using the site assessment forms as shown in Annex F
to Annex K. An objective ‘yes’ (√) or ‘no’ (x) assessment approach is adopted to indicate
compliance or non compliance of the assessed component and its respective elements. A
‘-‘ is given to indicate if the element is not available for assessment. The quality score is
computed based on the number of ‘√’ over the total number of elements assessed.

5
SECTION 2: QUALITY STANDARD
2.1 Components

The Quality Standards for Completed Road Works are divided into five main components:-

2.1.1 Road Surface

The ultimate function of a road is to transport people and goods from one place to another
efficiently with a desirable comfort and level of safety.

A road can only serve its function and achieve its designed life if the actual construction is
properly done, all the paving materials are of the required standards and meet the required
design specifications.

Because the road surface is in direct contact with road users, it is considered the most
important component in assessing the quality of a completed road works. The road
surface component is further divided into three elements namely carriageway, shoulder &
verge and median.

The carriageway is the part of the road where most vehicles are travelling on. The
shoulder & verge is the part of the road which is adjacent to the carriageway. Vehicle
would not normally use this part of the road as the shoulder act as the emergency lane.
Thus the road shoulder is given less importance than the road carriageway. The median is
the center part which serves as separator between carriageways.

The elements are assessed in terms of its riding quality, safety and aesthetics as detailed
in Annex A.

2.1.2 Slope and Retaining Structure

The slope and retaining structure component considered in this standard is only applicable
to the structure that is visible after construction.

The functional performance of the slope & retaining structure component has an influence
on the safety as well as the comfort of the road user. This component is divided into five
(5) main elements: slope (rigid, soft surface cover, rock), retaining structure, slope
drainage (surface and subsurface), above ground services and slope furniture.

These elements are assessed in terms of its defect groups such as crack & damage, joint,
fillers and gaps, functionality, finishing and installations as detailed in Annex B.

2.1.3 Drainage

The functional performance of the drainage system of a completed road works is

evaluated to ensure no flooding occurs which may affect the operations of the road.

For the purpose of this standard, this component is further divided into four (4) elements:
drain (not included under the Slope and Retaining Structure component), drain cover,
sump and pipe/box culverts.

These elements are assessed in terms of its crack & damage, joints & gaps, functionality
and finishing as detailed in Annex C.

6
2.1.4 Bridges and Other Structure

The bridge and other structures should be constructed according to approved standards to
ensure structural integrity. Repair and rectification works should be avoided as this tends
to be very costly, not to mention the inconvenience to the road users.

The bridges and other structures component are grouped into the different bridge/structure
types: above ground structures (such as road bridges, pedestrian/motorcycle bridges) and
special structures (such as underpass/vehicular box culverts and tunnels). Each of these
bridges/structures is further assessed in terms of its respective elements as detailed in
Annex D.

For special structures such as tunnels, where practical and accessible, the assessment
shall include all visible elements such as structural, mechanical, electrical, emergency
response and fire protection system. Assessment of these elements shall be by visual
inspection of its physical conditions and system operational.

2.1.5 Traffic / Road Furniture

The Traffic / Road Furniture ideally cover a wide range of physical fixtures and markings of
a road. For the purpose of this standard and for practicality of implementation, this
component has been streamlined to only cover elements that will have a direct impact to
the traffic operations and flow of a completed road.

The elements covered in this standard are: pavement markings, traffic calming devices,
traffic signs, electrical devices, pedestrian facilities, kerbs, traffic barriers and delineators.

These elements are assessed in term of crack & damage, functionality, visibility, finishings
and installation as detailed in Annex E.

2.2 Elements

For each of the components identified, the elements to be assessed are identified
accordingly to facilitate practical assessment and scoring system. The elements and some
examples of the type of elements are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. Elements and its Examples

Component Element Example of elements

Carriageway Asphaltic concrete

Road Surface Shoulder & Verge Paved or unpaved

Median Paved or unpaved

Slope & Retaining Slope Rigid, soft, rock surface

Structure Retaining Structure Facing wall
Drainage Surface & Subsurface Drainage

7
 Table 3. Elements and its Examples (continued)

Component Element Example of elements

Above ground service

Water pipes, telecommunication tower
furniture
Slope Furniture Handrail and fencing
Drain Roadside, median, shoulder drain

Drain Cover R.C. Slab, M.S Grating

Drainage Sump Concrete Sump, Brickwall sump

Culvert Body (Steel & Concrete),

Pipe / Box Culverts Headwall & Wingwall, R.C., C.M.P.
Culvert

Above ground structures Road bridge, Pedestrian / Motorcycle

(bridges) bridge
Bridge & Other
Structures
Special structures Box culvert, tunnels

Markings Pavement markings, pedestrian

Crossing, traffic Ghost Island
Traffic Calming devices Speed hump/table

Traffic Sign Warning, information signs

Electrical devices Traffic Signal, Pedestrian Push

Button Signal, Variable Message
Traffic / Road
Sign (VMS), street lighting
Furniture
Pedestrian facilities Sidewalk, bus stop,

Kerb Roadside, median, traffic island kerb

Traffic Barrier Guardrail, concrete & noise barrier,

crash cushion
Delineators Road studs, flexible pole

8
2.3 Defect Groups

Defect groups represent the parameter to benchmark the quality of workmanship. The
defect groups for all components are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4. Defect Groups for Assessment

Component Element Defect Groups

Road Surface Carriageway, Shoulder 1. Riding Quality

& Verge, Median 2. Safety
3. Aesthetic

Slope & Retaining Slope, Retaining 1. Crack and damage

Structure structure, Slope 2. Joint, filler and gaps
drainage, Above ground 3. Functionality
services, Slope furniture 4. Finishing
5. Installation

Drainage Drain, Drain Cover, 1. Crack and Damage

sump, pipe / box culvert 2. Joint and Gap
3. Functionality
4. Finishing
Bridge & Other Above Ground bridge 1. Crack and Damage
Structures (Road bridge, 2. Joint and Gap
Pedestrian / Motorcycle 3. Functionality
bridge), 4. Visibility
Special Structures 5. Finishing
(Underpass / vehicular 6. Installation
box culverts, Tunnel)
Traffic / Road Furniture Markings, Traffic 1. Crack and Damage
Calming devices, Traffic 2. Functionality
Sign, Electrical devices, 3. Visibility
Pedestrian facilities, 4. Finishing
Kerb, Traffic Barrier, 5. Installation
Delineators

9
10

Figure 1. Typical Road Cross Section

11
Figure 2. Typical Bridge Cross Section
SECTION 3: ASSESSMENT
The assessment for the completed road work is carried out through a statistical and sampling
approach.

3.1 Road Weightage

The road weightage for all components are allocated in accordance to the five road
categories. The weightage system is aimed to provide an objective score corresponding
to workmanship quality.

This weightage is developed based on the drivers’ visual perception and the component’
ability to provide comfort, safety, and assistance (i.e. control) to the driver. It is deemed
that each component will have different level of relevance for the different road
categories, hence the different weightage as shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Road Weightage for All Components

Weightage by Road Categories (%)

Components
A B C D E
Road Surface 40 40 40 40 50
Slope & Retaining
Structure 15 15 10 10 5

Drainage 10 10 20 20 20
Bridge & Other
15 15 10 10 5
Structures
Traffic/Road Furniture 20 20 20 20 20
Total Road
100 100 100 100 100
Weightage (%)

3.2 Sampling

As it may be impractical to assess the whole length of the road projects, a sampling
1
approach is recommended. The sample size is developed from the Statistical formula of:

N
n =
1 + N (ε)²

where,
n = Sample Size
N = Total Length of Road in meters / Total Numbers of Elements
ε = Margin of error, the risk/error the assessor is willing to accept,
generally this is ± 5%

1
Elementary Sampling Theory, by Yamane 1967

12
 To determine an economical and practical sample size, a range of ε value was tested as
follows:

Option
Low Medium High
N (m) 1000 1000 1000

ε 10% 6.5% 2.5%

n 9% 19% 62%

From the above range, it is reasonable to adopt a minimum sample size of 20% or a
minimum of one (1) complete sample. The maximum sample limit shall be determined
by the assessor based on economic and practical considerations.

As a further guideline, the assessor may adopt a minimum or a maximum sample size as
follows:

• For roads less than 1 km in length, the whole section shall be assessed.
• For roads where most elements are available, a minimum sample size of 20% is
sufficient
• For roads with limited elements, the following practical sample size is
recommended:

Sample size

Road Category Mainline

Intersection*
(%) Length per
Min Max
sample (km)
A 50% 20% 5 km 1
B1 25%
20% 5 km 1
B2 50%
C1 25%
20% 5 km 1
C2 50%
D 25%
20% 3 km 0.5
E 50%
NOTE: * % of the total number of intersections on the project road.

The sample shall be selected based on the road chainage and each sample shall, as much as
possible, cover all the 5 components to be assessed.

13
3.3 Weightage Guideline for Assessment
3.3.1 Road Surface

The weightage for Road Surface Elements are allocated as per Table 6.

Table 6. Weightage for Road Surface Elements

Weightage %
Road Surface Elements Total Breakdown
1. Carriageway 70
Riding Quality 50
Safety 15
Aesthetic 5
2. Shoulder and Verge 20
3. Median 10
Total 100
NOTE:
The highest weightage is given to the carriageway element as traffic travels on the road carriageway. Therefore,
it is imperative that the carriageway is of the highest quality for functionality and safety reasons. The road
shoulder acts as the emergency lane and is given a lower weightage. The lowest is given to the median which
do not carry any traffic.

3.3.2 Slope and Retaining Structure

A weightage for the Slope and Retaining Structure component is not applicable as each of the
elements is equally relevant in determining the functionality of the slope. The Quality Score
will be based on the number of compliance over the total number of elements assessed.

3.3.3 Drainage
The surface and underground drainage are equally relevant in its functionality and are given
equal weightage. However, each drainage elements are weighted based on its functionality.

For the purpose of the assessment, pipe/box culvert of less than 1.2m in diameter will only be
visually inspected at the inlet and outlet of the culvert. Whereas pipe/box culvert of 1.2m or
bigger in diameter shall be assessed on all the practical and accessible elements.

14
The weightage for the drainage elements are shown as per Table 7.

Table 7. Weightage for Drainage

Weightage %
Drainage Elements
Total Breakdown
1. Surface Drain 50
Drain 30
Drain Cover 5
Sump 15
2. Pipe/Box Culvert (Underground) 50 d<1.2m d>1.2m
Culvert Body - 40
Headwall and Wingwall 50 10
Total 100
NOTE:
The highest weightage value is given to the drainage element that is most affected in terms of its functionality to
carry off water should quality is compromised. The lowest weightage is allocated to drain cover as its function is for
safety purposes

15
3.3.4 Bridge and Other Structure
The two (2) elements of this component (i.e. bridges and special structures) are equally
weighted as each is equally important in its functionality. However, each of the bridge and
other structural elements are weighted based on its functionality.

Table 8. Weightage Guideline for Bridge & Other Structures

Weightage %
Bridge & Other Structures Elements
Total Breakdown
50
Pier 6
1. Bridge :
Road / Pedestrian / Abutment 6
Motorcycle Bridge Bearing Pad 5
Beam 6
Deck Slab 6
Surfacing 5
Expansion Joint 5
Parapet / Handrail 4
Drain Pipe 4
Staircase / ramp 2
Roof 1
50
2. Special Structure :
Structure 9
Underpass /
vehicular box Road Surface 2
culverts, Tunnel Drainage 2
Road Markings 2
Traffic Signs / VMS 5
Exhaust Fan / Ventilation 5
Fire Protection 5
Lighting 5
Plumbing 2
Fire Detection System 5
Communication System 2
Emergency Power System 2
Power Distribution System 2
Control Panel (control room) 2
TOTAL 100
NOTE:
The highest weightage value is given to the structural element that is most affected in terms of its functionality
should quality be compromised. Accessories of the bridge (i.e. roof, hand rail, road markings) are given lower
weightage as its effect is less severe.

16
3.3.5 Traffic/Road Furniture
The weightage for Traffic/Road Furniture elements are shown in Table 9.

Table 9. Weightage for Traffic/Road Furniture Element

Weightage %
Traffic/Road Furniture Elements
Total Breakdown
Marking 15
Traffic Calming 10
Speed table 10
Traffic Sign 20
Electrical Devices 15
Traffic Signal 6
Pedestrian Signal 3
Variable Sign 3
Street Lighting 3
Pedestrian Facilities 10
Sidewalk 5
Bus stop 5
Kerb 10
Roadside / Median Kerb 5
Traffic Island 5
Traffic Barrier 10
Guardrail 5
Concrete / Noise Barrier 3
Crash Cushion 2
Delineator 10
Flexible Pole 6
Road Studs 4
TOTAL 100
NOTE:
The higher weightage are allocated to the elements that controls traffic flow and gives vital information to traffic.
Thus, the lower the effect to the road user, the lower the weightage.

Examples of “good” and “poor” quality of road works are provided in the following pages.

17
Figure 3. Examples of Road Surface Conditions:

Riding Quality:

Joint smoothness ensures good riding quality Poor riding quality caused by undulations
Safety:

Carriageway with sufficient crossfall and Improper crossfall causing water to pool
superelevation
Aesthetic:

Consistence surface colour Surface colour inconsistencies

18
Figure 4. Different Types of Road Surface Defects (Aesthetic):

Cracking Rutting

Shoving Bleeding

Patching Pothole

19
Figure 5. Examples of Slope & Retaining Structure Conditions:

Crack and Damaged:

Proper turfing – soft surface cover Visible Cracks at Rigid Surface

Stabilisation:

Anchorage points firmly fixed Signs of distress

Above Ground Furniture:

Slope furniture securely fixed Poor furniture fixtures

20
Figure 6. Examples of Drainage Conditions:

Crack & Damaged:

Good Condition of roadside drain Vertical crack at drain wall

Safety:

Grating cover painted and level to frame Poor workmanship of grating cover and sump

Functionality:

Clean culvert inlet/outlet Siltation at culvert inlet/outlet

21
Figure 7. Examples of Bridge & Other Structures Conditions:

Crack & Damaged:

Smooth finishing at parapet Sign of crack at parapet

Joints & Gaps:

Smooth transition at joint Cracked joint

Finishings:

Smooth finishing Sign of distress

22
Figure 8. Examples of Traffic/Road Furniture:

Crack & Damaged:

Road kerbs in good and clean conditions Road kerbs cracked and damaged

Visibility:

Road markings distinct and clean Road markings not distinct

Finishings:

Proper coverings of electrical wiring Wiring not covered

23
3.4 Assessment Scoring

The quality score of the completed road project is computed based on the number of
compliance over the total number of elements assessed and is recorded in the Quality scoring
form as shown in Figure 3.

The total number of compliance and total number of item assessed as recorded in the site
assessment form are summarised in the quality scoring form. The Quality Score for each
component is calculated as follows:

Quality Total Compliance

= Σn X 100%
Score Total Assessed

where, n = number of components

In the event that each element of a component is weightaged, the Quality Score is calculated
as follow:

Quality Total Compliance Allocated Weightage

= Σn X X 100%
Score Total Assessed Total Actual Weightage

where, n = number of components

The actual weightage is recalculated to take into account items that are not applicable for the
specific project.

The quality score of each component are further weightage according to the respective road
categories to derive the QLASSIC Score as follow:

QLASSIC
= Σn Quality Score X Road Weightage
Score

where, n = number of components

24
 QLASSIC Scoring Forms

25
Figure 3. Example of QLASSIC Score Form
 ANNEX A
(Informative)

QUALITY STANDARDS FOR ROAD SURFACE WORKS

Assessment
Item Element Standards Tolerance
Tool
1. CARRIAGEWAY
1a General Requirements

i) Riding Qualtiy
a) Joint smoothness 3 metre
• Construction joints are smooth and flushed As per straight-edge
with the pavement surface construction
spec.
b) Surface Regularity
• Transverse irregularities do not exceed the 3 metre
allowable limit: straight-edge
Road Category A
Road Category B ≤4mm
Road Category C ≤4mm
Road Category D ≤8mm
Road Category E ≤8mm
≤12mm

≤2.0m/km Walking
• Roughness (measured in lane IRI) is not
Profiler or
more than the specified value
equivalent

• Maximum permissible number of

longitudinal irregularities depth exceeding Rolling
4mm over a section length of 75m: Straight Edge
Road Category A
≤9 nos.
Road Category B
≤9 nos.
Road Category C
≤18 nos.
Road Category D
≤18 nos.
Road Category E
≤27 nos.

• Maximum permissible number of

longitudinal irregularities depth exceeding Rolling
7mm over a section length of 75m: Straight Edge
Road Category A
Road Category B ≤1 nos.
Road Category C ≤1 nos.
Road Category D ≤2 nos.
Road Category E ≤2 nos.
≤3 nos.

- A 1-
 QUALITY STANDARDS FOR ROAD SURFACE WORKS (continued)

Assessment
Item Element Standards Tolerance
Tool
1. CARRIAGEWAY (continued)
1a General Requirements (cont’d)

i) Riding Quality b) Surface Regularity (cont’d)

• For longitudinal direction, the maximum
surface irregularities depth must not exceed:
Road Category A
Road Category B ≤10 mm
Road Category C ≤10 mm
Road Category D ≤15 mm
Road Category E ≤15 mm
≤15 mm
ii) Safety a) Surface Texture
• Surface has sufficient microtexture As per Portable Skid
construction resistance
spec. Tester or
equivalant

• Surface has sufficient macrotexture As per Sand patch or

construction equivalent
spec.
b) Gradient
• The surface grades, crossfall, and
superelevation are functional with no Visual /
waterponding Inclinometer

iii) Aesthetics a) Surface Appearance, Defects, and Cleanliness

• No visible cracks Visual
• No dragging marks Visual
• No obstacles, wastes, loose materials Visual
• Has consistent color Visual

• The road surface has no improper patching Visual

• The road surface has no visible potholes Visual

• The road has no excessive rutting ≤5mm 3 metre

straight-edge
• The road has no visible shovings Visual

• No visible bleeding of the pavement Visual

• For concrete pavement, no exposed Visual

reinforcements

- A 2-
Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment
Tool
1. CARRIAGEWAY (continued)
1a General Requirements (cont’d)

iii) Aesthetics b) Joints Appearance

• There are no visible cracking on Visual

construction joints
• Construction joints are not constructed on Visual
wheelpath

2. SHOULDERS AND VERGE

2a General Requirements

i) Safety a) Gradient
• The surface grades and crossfall do not Visual
cause waterponding or pose safety
hazard
Inclinometer /
Not lower
• Height of shoulder should not be higher Visual / Steel
than 50mm
than road surface or too low measuring
tape
ii) Aesthetics a) Turfing & Edge Defects
• Appropriate turfing. Visual
• No edge damage Visual

b) Surface Appearance, Defects, and

Cleanliness
Visual
• No visible cracks
• No dragging marks Visual

• No obstacles, wastes, loose materials Visual

• Has consistent color Visual
• No visible shovings Visual

• No undesirable disposal of waste

Visual
construction material

- A 3-
 QUALITY STANDARDS FOR ROAD SURFACE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool
3. MEDIAN
3a General Requirements
a) Aesthetics a) Turfing & Edge Defects

t Appropriate turfing. Visual

t No edge damage Visual
b) Surface Appearance, Defects, and
Cleanliness
t No undesirable disposal of waste Visual
construction material

NOTE: This standard is primarily for new roads of flexible pavements. For other types of pavements, specific requirements/standards
in terms of surface regularity and surface texture shall be as per contractual agreement.

-A4-
 ANNEX B
(Informative)
QUALITY STANDARD FOR SLOPE & RETAINING STRUCTURE WORKS

Assessment
Item Element Standards Tolerance
Tool
1 SLOPES: ROCK, RIGID & SOFT SURFACE COVER
1a. General Requirements

i) Crack and • No visible crack, damage and spalling Visual

Damage

ii) Joint, Filler • No open joints Visual

and gaps
• No loose rock debris Visual
• No missing or deteriorated joint filler and sealant Visual

iii) Functionality • No eroded area/erosion scar Visual

• No bare slope surface Visual

iv) Finishing • No undesirable vegetation growth Visual

• No dead, decaying or unstable trees Visual

v) Installation • Contact with soil underneath Visual

1b. Rock Slope

i) Crack and • No severely corroded anchorage points Visual

Damage
• No damaged wire mesh or rock netting Visual
• No signs of cracking and any defects at rock bolt Visual
and concrete cover

ii) Installation • Anchorage points must remain intact and firmly Visual
fixed to the rock slope

2 RETAINING STRUCTURE
2a General Requirements
i) Crack and • No crack, damage and spalling of concrete Visual
Damage surface

ii) Joint, Filler • No missing, deteriorated joint filler and sealant Visual
and gaps
• Gaps between facing panels are free from any Visual
undesirable vegetation growth

-B 1-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR SLOPE & RETAINING STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Assessment
Item Element Standards Tolerance
Tool
2 RETAINING STRUCTURE (continued)
2a General Requirements (cont’d)

iii) Functionality • No sign of distress, settlement and tension crack, Visual

deformation, tilting and bulging of the retaining
structure
iv) Finishing • Should not have visual exposure of groups of Visual
coarse aggregates resulting from grout leakage
• No undesirable vegetation growth Visual
• No debris from defense measures Visual
• No exposed rebar Visual
• No dislocation of masonry blocks Visual
3 SLOPE DRAINAGE
3a General Requirements

i) Functionality • Free flowing and no ponding of water Visual

• No accumulated debris, undesirable vegetation Visual

and other obstructions in drainage channel

3b Surface Drain
i) Crack and • No visible crack, damage, and spalling Visual
Damage

ii) Joint, Filler • No missing or deteriorated joint filler and sealant Visual
and gaps Visual
• No gaps between drainage and soil
3c Subsurface Drain
i) Crack and • No crack, damage and spalling of concrete Visual
Damage surface
ii) Functionality • No traces of seepage Visual

• No obstruction in weepholes and pipe ends Visual

-B 2-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR SLOPE & RETAINING STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Assessment
Item Element Standards Tolerance
Tool
4 ABOVE GROUND SERVICES
4a Surface water carrying services
i) Crack and • No visible damage Visual
Damage

ii) Functionality • No leaks at exposed water carrying services Visual

iii) Installation • Pipes properly supported and bent without Visual

damage
4b Buried water services

i) Functionality • No signs of water leakage from services Visual and

Leak Detection
Equipment
5 SLOPE FURNITURE
5a General Requirements

i) Crack and • No stain mark Visual

Damage
• No visible damage / defect Visual

• No sign of corrosion Visual

ii) Finishing • Level and in alignment Visual

iii) Installation • Secured and safe Visual

-B 3-
 ANNEX C
(Informative)
QUALITY STANDARD FOR DRAINAGE WORKS

Assessment
Item Element Standards Tolerance
Tool
1. DRAIN
1a. General Requirements
i) Crack and • No visible damage e.g cracks, Visual
Damage leaks (1.2m distance
from structure)
ii) Joints and Gap • Consistent joint width and neat Visual
joint
• Consistent gap Visual
iii) Functionality • Clear and free from silt, debris and Visual
vegetation growth
Visual
• Flowing with no obstruction or
ponding water Visual
• No erosion or scour in earth
channel
2. DRAIN COVER
2a. General Requirements
i) Joints and Gap • No gaps between drain covers Visual
• No gaps between side of drain Visual
ii) Finishing • Covers to be leveled with frames Visual
• Grating cover to be properly Visual
painted
3. SUMP
3a. General Requirements
i) Functionality • Clear and free from silt, debris and Visual
vegetation growth
• Invert level at drain inlet is higher Visual
than drain outlet
Visual
• Sitting below invert level of
incoming drains or culverts Visual
• Free flowing with no obstruction
ii) Finishing • Exposed brickwork to be finished Visual
with neat joint

- C 1-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR DRAINAGE WORKS (continued)

Assessment
Item Element Standards Tolerance
Tool
4. CULVERT
4a General Requirement
i) Functionality • Clear and free from silt, debris and Visual
vegetation growth (Use torchlight)
• Recent high water mark at up stream Visual
not higher than culvert internal
diameter
• No sign of erosion/siltation Visual
• No visible water ponding (For dry Visual
culvert)
• Free flowing with consistent gradient Visual
(for waterway crossing) (use ping pong
ball)

ii) Finishing
• End of pipe to be normal to the Visual
headwall and centerline of the pipe

4b Box / Pipe Culvert Body (Steel)

i) Crack and • No erosion or rusting of steel Visual
Damage
• Steel member not fractured Visual
• No permanent deformation Visual

• No paint deterioration Visual

ii) Joint and Gap • No loose or missing fastener at

Visual
connection

- C 2-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR DRAINAGE WORKS (continued)

Assessment
Item Element Standards Tolerance
Tool
4c. Box / Pipe Culvert Body (Concrete)
i) Crack and • No visible damage e.g. large or deep
Visual
Damage cracks, leaks etc.
• Free from rust stain due to corrosion Visual
of reinforcement
ii) Joint and Gap • Assembled and jointed to line and Visual
level

4d. Headwall and Wingwall

i) Crack and • No crack through the full thickness of
Visual
Damage the wall
• No honey combing or open texture Visual
• Free from rust stain due to corrosion Visual
of reinforcement
• No sign of erosion, undermining and Visual
settlement

- C 3-
 ANNEX D
(Informative)
QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool
I. ROAD/PEDESTRIAN/MOTORCYCLE BRIDGE
A. GENERAL 1) Crack and Damage
REQUIREMENT • No horizontal or vertical crack Visual
at concrete structure
• No crack or fracture at steel
member Visual

B. PIERS 1) Crack and Damage

(pile cap& end, • No rust stain/marine growth Visual
pier wall and at exposed surface
column) • No tilt or settlement Visual

2) Finishing
• No material deterioration or Visual
honey combing
• No concrete discoloration Visual
• Formwork joint not visible Visual
C. ABUTMENTS 1) Crack and Damage
(Including • No deteriorating concrete in Visual
headwall and areas that exposed to
wingwall) roadway drainage
• Construction joints at
backwalls not crack or move Visual

2) Finishing
• No rust stain in the exposed Visual
concrete
• No stain or patching Visual
• No left over foreign material
on finish surface Visual
• Formwork joint not visible Visual

3) Functionality
• Drains and weep holes are
clear and functioning properly Visual
• No sign of erosion around the
abutment Visual

4) Installation
• Interlocking abutment (if any)
properly installed Visual

-D 1-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool
D. BEARING PADS 1) Crack and Damage
• No splitting or tearing, either Visual
vertically or horizontally

• No bulging on the sides of

the pads caused by Visual
excessive compression

2) Finishing
• No debris/vegetation or
ponding water Visual

• No variable thickness other

than due to normal rotation Visual
of the bearing

3) Functionality
• No abnormal flattening due Visual
to overloading
• No displacement < 3mm Steel
measuring
tape
E. STEEL 1) Crack and Damage
BEAM/GIRDER • Steel members show neither Visual
corrosion nor rusting

2) Joints and Gap

• No loose or missing fastener Visual

3) Finishing
• No deformation of steel Visual
member

-D 2-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool
F. CONCRETE 1) Finishing
BEAM/ • No spalling concrete, Visual
GIRDER especially at point of bearing
(Beam, Cross
beam) • Expose concrete surface
free from rust stains due to Visual
corrosion of reinforcement

• Disintegrated concrete at
area exposed to roadway Visual
drainage

• Debris and standing water

not appear at the top of Visual
cross beams

G. STEEL DECK 1) Crack and Damage

SLAB • Steel members are not
corroded Visual

• No deformation of steel
members Visual

• Slab free from water leaking Visual

Joints and Gap

• No loose or missing fastener Visual
at connection

-D 3-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool

H. CONCRETE 1) Crack and Damage

DECK SLAB • No surface defect especially Visual
near the expansion joint

2) Finishing
• No map cracking of wearing
surface which develop by Visual
reflection cracking of
concrete deck
• Smooth riding transition from
one pavement segment to Visual
the next

I. SURFACING 1) Finishing
• Pavement in good condition Visual
with no potholes or cracks
• Proper crossfall Visual
• For pedestrian bridge, finish Visual
materials are properly install
• No loss of bond and Visual
delamination
• No wheel track rutting Visual
• No settlement/depression at
approach slab to abutment Visual

J. EXPANSION 1) Crack and Damage

JOINT • No water leaking Visual

• No difference in level ≤ 10mm Steel

measuring
tape
• No abnormal spacing Visual
2)
Finishing
• Securely fixed/using Visual
appropriate material

-D 4-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool
K. DRAIN PIPES 1) Crack and Damage
• Pipes not damage Visual

2) Functionality
• Drain opening and outlet Visual
provided and no clogging
• Evenness of scupper drain Visual
• No entrapped water which Visual
cause deterioration
• No sand and debris at drain Visual
opening
• No sign of leaking Visual

3) Installation
• Proper drain direction Visual
• Hanger properly located and Visual
spacing.

L. PARAPET/HAND 1) Crack and Damage

RAIL • No impact damage or Visual
spalling at concrete
2) Joints and Gap
• Concrete expansion joint to Visual
be neat
3) Installation
• Handrail joint provided at Visual
correct location
• Bridge parapet consistently Visual
align to road carriageway
• Hand railing properly fixed Visual
• No loose or missing Visual
fasteners at every joints of
steel member
4) Finishing
• Consistent painting for steel Visual
railing
• Neat concrete finishing at all Visual
jointing

-D 5-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool
M. RAMP/STAIRCAS 1) Finishing
E • Consistent friction between Visual
(PEDESTRIAN/R ramp surface and motorbike
AMP BRIDGE) tyre
• Staircase with consistent Visual
step height and landing
width
• Ramp with safe gradient for Visual
motorbike

2) Installation
• Ramp/staircase aligned with Visual
pedestrian walkway

N. ROOF 1) Crack and Damage

(PEDESTRIAN/R • No crack or damage Visual
AMP BRIDGE)
2) Finishing
• Roof properly fixed with no Visual
loose jointing

-D 6-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool
II. UNDERPASS/VEHICULAR BOX CULVERT AND TUNNEL
A. GENERAL 1) Crack and Damage
REQUIREMENT • No water leakage or water Visual
penetration through
concrete/steel surface

• No settlement occur in
transition area Visual

2) Joints and Gap

• No loose or missing
connection bolt of fabricated Visual
concrete, steel and cast iron
liners.

• Gasket between segmental

tunnel liners not dislodged Visual
from the joint.

3) Finishing
• Colour of wall to be bright Visual
and clean

B. CONCRETE 1) Crack and Damage

STRUCTURE • No crack or scaling on Visual
structure

C. STEEL 1) Crack and Damage

STRUCTURE • Steel members are not Visual
corrosion and crack

• No buckles and kinks Visual

-D 7-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool
D. ROAD SURFACE 1) Finishing
• Pavement in good condition Visual
with no pot-holes, cracks or
wheel track rutting

• Proper crossfall Visual

• No loss of bond and Visual

delimitation

E. TRAFFIC SIGN 1) Crack & Damage

• No visible damage (not bend, Visual
broken or dented)

2) Visibility
• Distinctly visible Visual
F. MARKINGS 1) Visibility
• Marking is distinct and clean Visual

• Recto reflective of road marking Visual

G. DRAINAGE 1) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage e.g. Visual
cracks, leaks

2) Functionality
• Capable of handling water Visual
flow
• Sump pumps are clear of Visual
debris to permit free flow
through the drain
H. VENTILATION 1) Finishing
SYSTEM • All equipment in good Visual
(Fan, airway, condition
louver, motor
operated and 2) Functionality
dampers) • Fan and associated motor – Visual
operated dampers are
operational
• Airways (where accessible) Visual
are free of obstruction and
debris

-D 8-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool
I. CONTROL PANEL 1) Functionality
• Control panel indicators are Visual
functioning

J. PLUMBING Crack and Damage

SYSTEM • Piping is free of leakage Visual

Functionality
• Plumbing fixtures are properly Visual
install and function

K. FIRE 1) Installation
PROTECTION • All equipments are properly Visual
(Fire extinguishers, fixed.
hose connections,
piping, pumping 2) Finishing
system, circulation • Fire protection storage tanks, Visual
pumps and hose alarm and level switches in
reels) good condition

3) Functionality
• Fire control panel is
functioning Visual

L. POWER 1) Crack and Damage

DISTRIBUTION • No sign of damage and Visual
SYSTEM overheating equipment
• No damage or corrosion of Visual
wiring system

2) Installation
• Enclosure box covers and Visual
conduit are in place and
secure

3) Functionality
• Motor controller properly Visual
operate

-D 9-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool
M. EMERGENCY 1) Functionality
POWER SYSTEM • System is functioning when
the normal power fails

N. LIGHTING 1) Crack and Damage

SYSTEM • No visible damage of all Visual
lightings
• Bulb not burnt out Visual

2) Installation
• Lighting is properly fixed and Visual
clean

3) Functionality
• Sufficient lighting provided Visual
• Lighting with different ranges Visual
of nighttime and daytime
illumination

O. FIRE DETECTION 1) Crack and damage

SYSTEM • Drill switch in good condition Visual

2) Functionality
• Annunciators and notification
appliances are functioning Visual

P. COMMUNICATION 1) Functionality
SYSTEM • Communication devices are Visual
(SCADA, CCTV functioning
Cameras, • Traffic signals properly Visual
telephone and operate
radio)

-D 10-
 ANNEX E
(Informative)
QUALITY STANDARD FOR TRAFFIC / ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS

Assessment
Item Element Standards Tolerance
Tool
1. PAVEMENT MARKINGS
1a General Requirements

i) Visibility • Marking is distinct and clean Visual

• Recto reflective of road marking White=
90mcd/lx.m², Drive on road
Yellow= (night) and
65mcd/lx.m² Rectro
reflective-meter

ii) Finishing • No other patches and spray and crack on Visual

the painting
• Markings is aligned to the edge line of the Visual
road
2. TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES
2a Speed Hump / Speed Table

i) Visibility • Painting is distinct and clean Visual

ii) Finishing • Interlocking pavers are properly

interlocked with no missing pavers Visual

3. TRAFFIC SIGN
3a General Requirement

i) Crack and • No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty) Visual

Damage

ii) Functionality • Mounted facing the direction of the traffic Visual

that is being served

iii) Visibility • Sign face and painting is distinct, no paint Visual

peeling and no debris on the signs
• Sign face is not obstructed by any object Visual
• Night time visibility Visual (Flash
with Torch light)
iv) Installation • Pole is sturdy, straight and secure Physical/Plumb
Bob/Spirit level

-E 1-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR TRAFFIC / ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS (continued)

Assessment
Item Element Standards Tolerance Tool
3. TRAFFIC SIGN (continued)
v) Finishing t Proper joint and no visible gap of the sign Visual
face
t Paint of the sign pole is clean & no patches Visual

4 ELECTRICAL DEVICES : TRAFFIC/PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, STREET LIGHTING, MESSAGE SIGNS

4a General Requirements
i) Crack and t No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty) Visual
Damage

ii) Functionality t All light bulb / LED are lighted Visual

t Push button facility is operational when Visual
pressed
t Lighting covers the traffic lane continuously Visual
i.e. no zebra effect/ blackspot

iii) Visibility t Distinct and clear Visual

t Facing the traffic lane served Visual

iv) Finishing t Paint is clean i.e. no bleeds or patches Visual

t Reflective border is clear and not peeling
Visual
t Made good for the footing & its
surrounding Visual

v) Installation t Pole is sturdy and vertically straight Physical/Visual/

Plumb Bob/Spirit
level
t Wire is hidden and wire casing is closed Visual
t No displaced grass/landscape at Visual
foundation

t All components must securely installed Visual

5 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
5a Sidewalk and railing
i) Crack and t No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty) Visual
Damage

ii) Finishing t Surface is even and flat Visual

t Paint is clean and distinct Visual
t No overgrown grass Visual

-E 2-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR TRAFFIC / ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS (continued)

Assessment
Item Element Standards Tolerance Tool
5 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES (continued)
iii) Installation • Railing is sturdy Physical/Visual

5b Bus Stop (includes seats and railings)

i) Crack and • No sign of leaking Visual

Damage
• Fixtures are not damaged Visual

ii) Finishing • No overgrown grass or trees Visual

• All components must properly painted Visual
iii) Installation • Fixtures are sturdy Physical/Visual

6 KERB : ROAD SIDE, MEDIAN, TRAFFIC ISLAND

6a General Requirements

i) Crack and • No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty) Visual

Damage
ii) Finishing • No overgrown grass Visual
• Paint is clean and distinct (no patches or Visual
bleeding )
• Joint is not too wide 25mm (desirable) Steel ruler
iii) Installation • Kerbs are installed consistently align to the Visual
alignment

7 TRAFFIC BARRIER
7a Guardrail

i) Crack and • No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty) Visual

Damage
ii) Visibility • Distinct and clean Visual
• Reflective strips are clearly to be seen Visual

iii) Finishing • No displaced grass/pavement at Visual

foundation / made good to the foundation
• Consistently aligned to the carriageway Visual

-E 3-
 QUALITY STANDARD FOR TRAFFIC / ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS (continued)
Assessment
Item Element Standards Tolerance
Tool
7 TRAFFIC BARRIER (continued)
iv) Installation • Guardrail post is secure Physical/Visual
• W-beam is securely bolted to the splice Visual
and post
• Guardrail joint is not against the traffic flow Visual

7b Concrete & Noise Barrier

i) Crack and • No visible damage (broken, cracked or Visual
Damage chipped)

ii) Visibility • Paints are distinct & clean, no debris and Visual
no patches
• Reflective strips / sheets are clean and not Visual
bend
iii) Finishing • No overgrown grass Visual
• No discolouration Visual

7c Crash Cushion
i) Crack and • No visible damage (broken, dented, Visual
Damage cracked)
ii) Visibility • Reflective strips are clean Visual

iii) Finishing • No overgrown grass Visual

iv) Installation • Cartridge is inflated Visual

• Crash cushion is facing on-coming traffic Visual
flow
8 DELINEATOR: ROAD STUDS, FLEXIBLE POLE
8a General Requirements
i) Crack and • No visible damage (broken, dented, Visual
Damage cracked)
• Reflective sheet not peeling Visual

ii) Visibility • Reflective and clearly seen Visual

• Seen during night time Visual (night time
drive)
iii) Installation • Securely installed Visual / Physical
• Consistently aligned to the road Visual
carriageway

-E 4-
 ANNEX F
QLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORM
Component 1: Road Surface
Project Name: Assessor 1:
Project ID: Assessor 2:
Road Category: Date:
Carriageway Type: Single/Dual
Type of Surfacing :

Element Carriageway Shoulder and Verge Median

Defect
Group Riding Quality Safety Aesthetics Safety Aesthetics Aesthetics
Sample

Left
Sample ______
(km From ____ to
____)
Right

Left
Sample ______
(km From ____ to
____)
Right

Left
Sample ______
(km From ____ to
____)
Right

Left
Sample ______
(km From ____ to
____)
Right

Left
Sample ______
(km From ____ to
____)
Right

Total Compliance

Total Assessment

*Tolerance Table General Category A & B Category C & D Category E

Riding Quality
i) Joint Smoothness ≤ 3 mm
ii) Surface regularity
- Traverse irregularities ≤ 4 mm ≤ 8 mm ≤ 12 mm
- Lane IRI ≤ 2.0m/km
- Longitudinal irregularities (depth >4mm over 75m) ≤ 9 nos ≤ 18 nos ≤ 27 nos
- Longitudinal irregularities (depth >7mm over 75m) ≤ 1 nos ≤ 2 nos ≤ 3 nos
- Maximum surface irregularities ≤ 10 mm ≤ 15 mm ≤ 15 mm
Safety
i) Microtexture As per Construction Specifications
ii) Macrotexture As per Construction Specifications
Aesthetic
i) Rutting ≤ 5 mm

- F1 -
 ANNEX G
QLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORM
Component 2: Slope and Retaining Structures
Project Name: Assessor 1:
Project ID: Assessor 2:
Road Category: Date:
Carriageway Type: Single/Dual

Retaining
Elements Slopes * Slope Drainange Above Ground Service Slope Furniture
Structure
General Rock General General Surface Subsurface Surface Water Buried General
Requirements Slope Requirements Requirements Drain Drain Carrying Water Requirements
Joint, Filler & Gaps

Joint, Filler & Gaps

Joint, Filler & Gaps

Defect
Crack & Damages

Crack & Damages

Crack & Damages

Crack & Damages

Crack & Damages

Crack & Damages

Crack & Damages

Group Functionality

Functionality

Functionality
Functionality

Functionality

Functionality
Installation

Installation

Installation

Installation
Finishing

Finishing

Finishing
Sample

Sample ______ Left

(km From ____
to ____) Right

Sample ______ Left

(km From ____
to ____) Right

Sample ______ Left

(km From ____
to ____) Right

Sample ______ Left

(km From ____
to ____) Right

Sample ______ Left

(km From ____
to ____) Right

Sample ______ Left

(km From ____
to ____) Right

Sample ______ Left

(km From ____
to ____) Right

Sample ______ Left

(km From ____
to ____) Right

Sample ______ Left

(km From ____
to ____) Right

Sample ______ Left

(km From ____
to ____) Right

Sample ______ Left

(km From ____
to ____) Right

Total Compliance

Total Assessment

NOTE:
* = included rock slope, rigid and soft surface cover

- G1 -
 ANNEX H
QLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORM

Component 3: Drainage

Project Name: Assessor 1:

Project ID: Assessor 2:

Road Category: Date:

Carriageway Type: Single/Dual

SURFACE DRAIN CULVERTS (BOX/PIPE)

DRAIN DRAIN COVER SUMP CULVERT BODY (RC/STEEL) HEADWALL &

WINGWALL
Crack & Damage

Crack & Damage

Crack & Damage

Crack & Damage

Crack & Damage

Defect
Group

Functionality

Functionality

Functionality
Joint & Gap

Joint & Gap

Joint & Gap

Finishing

Finishing

Finishing

Finishing
Sample

Left

Sample _______
(KM From ___ to Median
____)

Right

Left

Sample ______
(KM From ____ to Median
____)

Right

Left

Sample ______
(KM From ____ to Median
____)

Right

Left

Sample ______
(KM From ____ to Median
____)

Right

Left

Sample ______
(KM From ____ to Median
____)

Right

Left

Sample ______
(KM From ____ to Median
____)

Right

Total of Compliance

Total of Assessed

- H1 -
 ANNEX I1
QLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORM
Component 4: Above Ground Structures : Road/Pedestrian/motorcycle Bridge

Project Name: Assessor 1:

Project ID: Assessor 2:

Road Category: Date:

Carriageway Type: Single/Dual

Elements Above ground Structures

Bearing Pad Steel Beam / Girder Concrete Beam / Steel Deck Slab Concrete Deck Surfacing Expansion Joint Drain Pipe/Drain Opening Parapet / Handrail Ramp / Roof
Pier Abutments Girder Slab Staircase

Defect
Group

Sample

Crack & Damage

Finishing
Crack & Damage
Functionality
Finishing
installation
Crack & Damage
Functionality
Finishing
Crack & Damage
Joint & Gap
Finishing
Crack & Damage
Finishing
Crack & Damage
Joint & Gap
Crack & Damage
Finishing
Crack & Damage
Finishing
Crack & Damage
Finishing
Crack & Damage
Functionality
Installation
Crack & Damage
Joint & Gaps
Finishing
installation
Finishing
Installation
Crack & Damage
Finishing

Left
Sample ____
(km ______
Right

Left
Sample _____
(km ______
Right

Left
Sample _____
(km ______
Right

- I1 -
Left
Sample _____
(km ______
Right

Left
Sample _____
(km ______
Right

Left
Sample _____
(km ______
Right

Total Compliance

Total Assessed

NOTE : Sampling guide for Girder/beam, Pier and Bearing Pad at each bridge. Random sample selected and marked on As Built Drawing before inspection.

1. Less than 50 numbers = 5 numbers sample

2. 51 to 100 numbers = 10 numbers sample

3. More than 100 numbers = 15 numbers samples

 ANNEX I2
QLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORM
Component 4: Underpass/Vehicular Box Culvert and Tunnel

Project Name: Assessor 1:

Project ID: Assessor 2:

Road Category: Date:

Carriageway Type: Single/Dual

Elements Underpass / Vehicular Box Culverts and Tunnel

General Requirements Concrete Steel Structure Road Traffic Signs s g Drainage

n i k r a MVentilation l e nPlumbing
a P l o r t n o Cn o i t c e t o yr P
c Lighting
n e e r ig Fr e nm o Ei t System
u b i r Fire i D
t s Detection w o P
r e Communication
Structure Surface System System Power System System System System

Defect
Group

Sample

Crack & Damage

Joint & Gap
Finishing
Crack & Damage
Crack & Damage
Finishing
Crack & Damage
Visibily
Visibily
Crack & Damage
Functionality
Functionality
Finishing
Functionality
Crack & Damage
Functionality
Functionality
Finishing
Installation
Functionality
Crack & Damage
Functionality
Installation
Crack & Damage
Functionality
Installation
Functionality
Functionality

Left
Sample ______
(km From ____
to ____)
Right

Left
Sample ______
(km From ____

- I2 -
to ____)
Right

Left
Sample ______
(km From ____
to ____)
Right

Left
Sample ______
(km From ____
to ____)
Right

Left
Sample ______
(km From ____
to ____)
Right

Total Compliance

Total Assessed
 ANNEX J

QLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORM

Component 5: Traffic/Roadside Furniture
Project Name: Assessor 1 :
Project ID: Assessor 2:
Road Category: Date:
Carriageway Type: Single/Dual

Pavement Traffic Calming

Element Traffic Sign Electrical Devices* Pedestrian Facilities Kerb** Traffic Barrier Delineator***
Markings Devices

General Speed Hump /

General Requirements General Requirements Sidewalk & Railing Bus stop (Seats & railing) General Requirements Guardrail Concrete & Noise Barrier Crash Cushion General Requirements
Requirements Table

Defect
Group

Sample

Visibility
Finishing
Visibility
Finishing
Crack & Demage
Functionality
Visibility
Installation
Crack & Demage
Functionality
Visibility
Finishing
Installation
Crack & Demage
Finishing
Installation
Crack & Demage
Finishing
Installation
Crack & Demage
Finishing
Installation
Crack & Demage
Visibility
Finishing
Installation
Crack & Demage
Visibility
Finishing
Crack & Demage
Visibility
Finishing
Installation
Crack & Demage
Visibility
Installation

Left

Sample ___
(km From
Median
________ to
_____)

Right

Left

Sample ___
(km From
Median
________ to
_____)

Right

Left

Sample ___

- J1 -
(km From
Median
________ to
_____)

Right

Left

Sample ___
(km From
Median
________ to
_____)

Right

Left

Sample ___
(km From
Median
________ to
_____)

Right

Total Compliance

Total Assessment

NOTE:
* = include Traffic / Pedestrian Signal, Street Light, Message Sign
** = include Road side, Median and Traffic island kerbs
*** = include Road Studs and Flexible Pole
 ANNEX K
(Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF ROAD SURFACE WORKS

DEFECT
ELEMENTS DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE
GROUP
Carriageway Riding t Joints are smooth and As per Construction Specifications
Quality flushed
t Maximum Transverse A 4mm
Regularity B 4mm
C 8mm
D 8mm
E 12mm
t International ≤ 2 m/km
Roughness Index
t Maximum number of >4mm >7mm >10mm >15mm
longitudinal regularities A 9 nos. 1 nos. 0 0
exceeding allowable
B 9 nos. 1 nos. 0 0
limit, over a traverse
length of 75m C 18 nos. 2 nos. 2 nos. 0
D 18 nos. 2 nos. 2 nos. 0
E 27 nos. 3 nos. 3 nos. 0
Safety t Microtexture As per Construction Specifications
t Macrotexture As per Construction Specifications
t Gradient Water drainable (No water ponding)
Aesthetics t No cracks/dragging
marks/patching
t No loose
material/potholes
t No excessive rutting ≤5mm
t No shovings/ bleedings
t No exposed
reinforcement
(concrete)
t Joints not cracked/on
wheelpath

-K1-
 DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF ROAD SURFACE WORKS (continued)

DEFECT
ELEMENTS DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE
GROUP
Shoulder and Safety t No waterponding
Verge t Shoulder not too low Not lower than 50mm
Aesthetics t No cracks/dragging
marks/patching
t No loose
material/potholes
t No overgrown turfing
t No damaged edge of
pavement
t No shovings/ bleedings
t No undesirable
construction waste

Median Aesthetics t No overgrown turfing

t No damaged edge of
pavement
t No undesirable
construction waste

-K2-
 ANNEX L
(Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF SLOPE & RETAINING STRUCTURES WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE

Slope Crack & Damages t No visible crack, damages and spalling
t No corroded anchorage points (rock slope)
t No damaged wire mesh/rock netting
Joints, filler & gaps t No open joints/loose debris
t No missing/deteriorated fillers/sealant
Functionality t No eroded area/bare surface
Finishing t No undesirable vegetation/dead /unstable
trees
Installation t Contact with soil underneath
t Anchorage is intact & firmly fixed (rock slope)
Retaining Crack and Damage t No visible crack, damages and spalling
Structure Joint, fillers & gap t No missing/deteriorated fillers/sealant
t No undesirable vegetation at panel gaps
Functionality t No signs of distress, settlement, deformation,
tilting, bulging
Finishing t No exposed aggregates/rebar
t No undesirable vegetation
t No dislocation of masonry blocks
Slope Drainage Crack & Damage t Crack, damage and spalling
Joint, fillers & gaps t No missing and deteriorated joint
fillers/sealant
t No gaps between drainage & soil (surface
drain)
Functionality t No seepage
t No obstruction in weepholes/pipe ends
Above ground Crack & Damage t No visible damage/
services Functionality t No leaks
Installation t Pipes properly supported, not damaged
Slope Furniture Crack & Damage t No stain marks/visible damage/corrosion
Finishing t Level and in alignment
Installation t Secured/sturdy

- L1 -
 ANNEX M
(Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR DRAINAGE WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE

Drain Crack and t No visible damages/cracks
Damage
Joint and Gap t Consistent joint width and neat
t Consistent gap

Functionality t Clear and free from silt/debris/vegetation

t Free flowing with no ponding water
t No visible erosion or scouring in earth
channel
Drain Cover Joint and Gap t No gaps between drain covers, side of drain

Finishing t Covers level with frame

t Gratings painted properly
Sump Functionality t Clear and free from silt/debris/vegetation
t Free flowing with no ponding water
t Inlet invert level is higher than outlet
t Sitting below invert level of incoming drain
Finishing t Neat joints

Culvert Crack and t No erosion/rusting/deformation (steel culvert)

Damage t No honey combed/open texture
(headwall/wingwall)

Functionality t Clear and free from silt/debris/vegetation

t Water mark level at up stream not higher
than culvert internal diameter
t Free flowing with consistent gradient and no
ponding (dry culvert)
Jointing and Gap t Assembled and jointed to line and level
(concrete culvert)
t No loose or missing fastener (steel culvert)

Crack and t No visible damage/defect

Damage
Finishing t End pipe normal to headwall and centre
t Surface smooth and even
t Free from rust stain

-M1-
 ANNEX N
(Informative)
DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF BRIDGE & OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE

Above ground Crack and Damage t No visible crack/defect/fracture
structure / t No corrosion/ fracture/deformation of steel
bridge members
t No tilt/settlement (pier, expansion joint)
t No deterioration of concrete (abutment)
t No splitting/tearing/bulging (bearing pads)
t No abnormal spacing (expansion joint)
t No leakages (drain pipes)
Jointing and Gap t No cracked joints (abutment, joint)
t No loose/missing fastener (steel
beam/girder, slab, roof)
Functionality t Drains/weepholes/outlets are clear
t No abnormal flattening (bearing pads)
t No debris / ponding water (beams, slab,
drain)
t Evenness (scupper drain)
Finishing t No deterioration/honey comb (pier, beam)
t No debris/vegetation/ponding (bearing pads)
t No variable thickness other than normal
rotation (bearing pads)
t No deformation of steel members (steel
beam/girder)
t No spalling concrete
t No rust stains
t No pot holes (surface)
t Proper crossfall (surface)
t No rutting (surface)
t Consistent painting
t Consistent step height & landing width
(stairs)
t Safe gradient (motorcycle ramp)

Installation t Hanger properly located and spaced (drain

pipes)
t Fixtures securely fixed (handrail)
t Consistently aligned to road (parapet)
t Ramp/staircase aligned to pedestrian
walkway

-N1-
 DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF BRIDGE & OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS
(continued)

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE

Underpass / Crack and Damage t No water leakages
Vehicle Box t No settlement
Culvert, Tunnel t No crack/spalling
t No corrosion/buckle/kinks
t No visible damage/cracks
t No overheating (equipments)
Jointing and Gap t No loose/missing connection bolt
t No dislodged gasket
Functionality t No ponding
t Clear of debris/obstruction (drain, airways)
t Equipments are operational (dampers, control
panel, fire control, communication)
t Equipments are operational when power failure
(emergency power system)
t No burnt bulbs
t Consistent lighting (no blackspots/zebra
effects)
Finishing t Clean wall
t No potholes/cracks/wheel track rutting
(surface)
t Proper crossfall
t No loss of bond/delamination (surface)
t Equipments in good condition/clean
Visibility t Markings is distinct (pavement marking)
t Recto reflective of road markings

Installation t Equipments are securely installed (lightings,

electrical equipments)
t Box covers are in place & secured

-N2-
 ANNEX O
(Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC & ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE

Pavement Visibility t Marking is clearly seen
Markings t Night time visibility
Finishing t No other patches / crack
t Properly / uniformly align
Traffic Visibility t Marking is clearly seen
Calming
Aesthetic t No missing pavers
Device
Traffic Sign Crack & Damage t No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty)
Functionality t Sign is facing on-coming traffic
Visibility t Marking is clearly seen
t Night time visibility
Installation t Sturdy & straight
Finishing t No visible gap & proper joint of the signage face
t Paint of the signage pole is clean & no patches
Electrical Crack & Damage t No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty)
Devices Functionality t All bulb & LED is lighted
t Push button is functional when pressed
t No blackspot and zebra effect
Visibility t Message/Symbol is clearly seen
Finishing t Paint/reflective border is clean/not peeling
t Made good at foundation
Installation t Sturdy & straight
t Wiring is hidden & covered
t No displace turfing at foundation
Pedestrian Crack & Damage t No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty)
Facilities t No leakage (bus stop)
Finishing t Surface is flat & even
t Paint is clean
t No overgrown grass
Installation t Fixtures are sturdy
Kerb Crack & Damage t No visible damage (crack, broken)
Finishing t No overgrown grass
t Painting is clean
t Kerb joints not too wide
Installation t Consistently aligned to road

-O1-
 DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC & ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS
(continued)

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE

Traffic Barrier Crack & Damage t No visible damage (crack, broken, dented)
Visibility t Clearly seen (day & night)
Finishing t No displaced grass at foundation
t No discolouration (concrete/noise barrier)
t Consistently aligned to road
Installation t Post is secure/securely bolted
t Joint is not against traffic flow
t Cartridge is inflated (crash cushion)
Delineator Crack & Damage t No visible damage (crack, broken)
Visibility t Clearly seen (day & night)
Installation t Securely installed
t Consistently aligned to road

-O2-
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The committee which developed this Malaysian Construction Industry Standard consists of
the following representatives:

Ir Sia Han See (Chairman : 2009 - 2010 April) Construction Industry Development
Board
Ir Mukhtar Che Ali (Chairman : 2010 May - Present) Construction Industry Development
Board
Mohammad Faizal Bin Abdul Hamid (Secretary) Construction Industry Development
Board

Ir Shamsuddin Bin Sabri / Highway Planning Unit, Ministry of

Abdul Aziz Bin Ahmad Works, Malaysia

Zahratul `Ula Binti Mohamad Ibrahim/

Mohd Faizan Ibrahim Malaysia Highway Authority

Ir Assoc Prof Adnan Bin Zulkiflie/

Ir Chin Kar Keong The Institution of Engineers Malaysia

Ir Anuar Bin Abdul Mohd Aris/ The Association of Consulting Engineers

Ir Hamzah Bin Ismail Malaysia

Asmaniza Binti Asnan/

Johari Jivisol Abdullah PLUS Expressway Berhad

64