Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module
In
EE 514
College of Engineering
BSEE
WPU-QSF-ACAD-82A Rev. 00 (09.15.20)
Module No. 1
ARMAN M. ARANGORIN
Assistant Professor I
arman.arangorin@wpu.edu.ph
Contents Page
Cover Page i
Title Page ii
Introduction v
Chapter 1 1
Title Chapter 1
Overview 1
Learning Outcomes 1
Pre-test 2
Time Allotment 2
Discussion 4
Activities/Exercises 24
Rubrics 25
Evaluation/Post-test 27
References 29
It is very important that the learner will cooperate in by using this module page
by page and completing all the activities asked. At the end learning outcome is
evaluated based the different task given to you. Through your cooperation in this kind
of flexible learning delivery, understanding and designing of DC armature, AC
armature and transformer is very much possible. It is expected that after using this
module you will become more prepared to the next lesson about the AC armature and
transformer designing.
Overview
Depending on the manner in which the coil ends are connected to the
commutator bars, armature windings can be grouped into two: lap windings and wave
windings. Wave winding gives greater voltage and smaller current ratings while the
lap winding supplies greater current and smaller voltage ratings.
Learning Outcomes
Select the correct answer for each of the following statements and place the
corresponding letter in the space provided.
1. A generator __________
a. changes electrical energy to mechanical energy.
b. changes mechanical energy to electrical energy.
c. is always self-excited.
d. is always separately excited.
5. what part of the Generator does not form the electrical circuit.
a. armature c. conductors
b. yoke d. commutator
6. what do you call the one that houses the armature conductors or coils and causes
them to rotate and hence cut the magnetic flux of the field magnets.
a. armature core c. field coils
b. yoke d. commutator
In this module we will discuss and explain how to solve the parameters required
to Design an Armature suitable for a dc generator provided with commutating poles,
to run at 1,200 rpm and develop 230 volts on open circuit and 250 volts at full-load
output of 300 kw.
It is advisable to follow the design sheet (see the table below) for us not to be
confused in the computation of the parameters required. And also to facilitate the step
by step procedure that will guide us through the design itself.
Computation
For the armature core and armature winding we should follow and compute for
the item number and the required parameter. The book Electrical Machine Design of
Alfred Still and Charles Siskind will be use as the reference for more clear explanation
about the formulas, constant values and tables that are used in this design. In the
computation we will input the value of the required parameter being solve on the
design sheet.
120 𝑓
P= 𝑁
where
F = frequency (60 Hertz) here in the Philippines
P = number of poles
N = rpm
120 𝑥 60
P= 1,200
= 6 poles
By interpolation method,
750−500 950−900
=
750−550 950−𝑥
Solving for the value of x, x will be the value of q
𝑥 = 910 = q
Thus, 𝑞 = 910
Item no. 4 Air-gap Density
Select B”g = 57,500 for the load 300 kW, again If the load assigned is not available in
the table interpolation is required to obtain the value of B”g, please show how you
interpolate.
𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝐾𝑤
I = 𝑓𝑢𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒
300 000 𝑤
I= = 1,200 amps
250 𝑉
The current in each armature circuit will be one sixth of the line current if the
shunt exciting current is neglected. A table giving the usual value of shunt field current,
expressed as a percentage of the output current, will be found on page 121.
Select shunt field exciting current = 0.7% for the load 300 kW, again If the load
assigned is not available in the table interpolation is required to obtain the value of
shunt field exciting current, please show how you interpolate.
laD2 = 4,850
(0.472D) D2 = 4,850
0.472 D3 = 4,850
D3 = 4,850/0.472
3 4,850
D = √0.472
D = 3√10,275.4237
D = 22 inches
𝜋 𝑥 22 𝑥 1,200
v= = 6, 900 fpm
12
Note: from table on page 14 the ampere conductor per pole (ZIc/p)
𝜋𝑥𝐷𝑥𝑞
Z= 𝐼𝑐
𝜋𝑥𝐷𝑥𝑞 𝜋 𝑥 𝐷 𝑥 𝑞 𝑥 𝐼𝑐 𝜋𝑥𝐷𝑥𝑞
( 𝐼𝑐
) (Ic/p) = =
𝐼𝑐 𝑥 𝑝 𝑝
𝜋 𝑥 22 𝑥 850
= = 9,800 ampere conductor per pole
6
The value is below the upper limit the design may proceed to the basis of six
poles and 10,000 – 15,000 is the range of upper limit.
The total no. of face conductor is therefor from the formula on article 2 on page
10.
𝜋𝑥𝐷𝑥𝑞
Z= 𝐼𝑐
𝜋𝑥𝐷𝑥𝑞 𝜋 𝑥 22 𝑥 850
Z= = = 291.7 ≈ 292 face conductors
𝐼𝑐 201.4
Item no. 12 number of slots (S)
Where S = no of slot
Z = no of conductors
= 73 slots
However, since it is desirable to have an odd integer of slots per pair of poles
the slot per pole should be an integer plus 1/2
Check
slot per pair of poles = S/ (pair of poles)
= 75/3 = 25 odd integer
Therefor the change in the value of S the value of Z will also change
Z = S x no. of conductors per slot
Z = 75 x 4 = 300 final value of face conductors
Therefore, from the assumption that we use for the number of conductors per
slot is 4 from item no. 12. Then the number of conductors per slot will be 4.
This may be determined from the final value of the output factor (laD2) since it
is inversely proportional to q.
laD2 = 4,850 x (850/875)
laD2 = 4,710
la = 4,710/D2
= 4,710/ (22) 2
la = 9.77 ≈ 9.75 inches
Therefore,
E x 60 x p1 x 108
Ф= = 3,833,000 maxwells
pNZ
rt = 0.64 x 11.5
= 7.37 in
Where:
la – length of armature (9.75)
𝑘 𝑣 700,000 6,900
Δ= + = + = 2,525 amp. per sq. in.
𝑞 4 875 4
𝐼𝑐
The area of cross section =
𝛥
𝐼𝑐 201.8
= 2,525 = 0.080 sq. in.
𝛥
𝜋𝑥𝐷
The slot pitch (λ) =
𝑛𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑡 (𝑆)
𝜋 𝑥 22
= 75 = 0.922 in.
assume 0.4 inches from the range 0.3 -0.5 on article 12 page 31.
it will make the ratio of tooth width to slot width from the range of 1.1 – 1.5 to
obtain the proper flux density on article 12 from page 31.
since a wire with an area of 0.08 sq. in. is heavy and difficult to bend and shape
it is desirable to use two conductors in parallel.
It is necessary now to find by trial the best arrangement of 300 conductors item 11
and 75 slots item 12.
Then the ratio of tooth width/slot width should be within the range of 1.1 – 1.5
Assume slot width = 0.4
Tooth width = 0.922 – 0.4 = 0.522
Since a wire with an area of 0.08 sq. in. is heavy and difficult to bend and shape
it is desirable to use two conductors in parallel.
Area of conductor
0.08 sq. in
0.07 in
WPU-QSF-ACAD-82A Rev. 00 (09.15.20)
Item no. 21 slot pitch
𝝅𝑥𝐷
The slot pitch (λ) =
𝑛𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑡 (𝑆)
𝜋 𝑥 22
=
75
= 0.922 in
S = 0.4
The slot depth = thickness of hard wood (0.135 in) + insulation spaces above,
below and between the coils (35 mils) + length of conductor (0.58 in)
d = 0.135 + (3 x 0.035) + (2 x 0.58)
= 1.4 in
insulation spaces above, below and between the coils (35 mils)
d = 1.4 in
L = 0.58 in
The width of the tooth at the root = ((π x (22-2.8))/75) – 0.4)= 0.405 in
λ slot
tooth
s
Refer to art. 16
where la = 9.75 in
= 9.75/ 4
Where
ln = 7.935 in Item no 26
Item no 25
S = no. of slot
Item no 2
P = no. of pole
Refer to article 17
the apparent flux density at the center of tooth, under open circuit condition is,
= flux per pole on open circuit/ cross section of iron under pole
Item no 27
= 3,833,000/29.4
Note that this value is above the upper limit given in the table on page 40 for
60 cycles. It will therefore, be necessary to correct or increase the length of the
armature core to bring the flux density down to a reasonable figure.
60 cycles --- 123,500 density --- 130, 374 greater than the upper limit
ln = 8.406 in.
la = 10.261 in
𝑙
R= ρ𝑎
Resistance of copper ρ = 1 ohm per cir. mil inch
4
1 sq. in. = ( ) 𝑥 106 cir. Mils From item no. 29
𝜋
𝑙𝑐
R=ρ
𝑎
56
= (1 ohm per cir. mil inch) 4
2(0.07𝑥0.58)𝑥 ( 𝜋 ) 𝑥 106
R = 5.416 x 10-4
From item no. 19
R = 0.0005416 ohm
= 300/2
= 150
Resistance per circuit = resistance of one turn x (no of turns/ parallel path)
= 0.01354 ohms
The total resistance of the armature = one sixth of the resistance per circuit
= 1/6 x 0.01354
= 0.0023 ohms
Compare the percent of IR drop to full load voltage from the table on art. 16 page 38
= IR x (I x 6)
= 256.065 V
Ф
Rd =
2 𝑥 ln 𝑥 73,000
From item no. 9
4, 267,000
=
2 𝑥 8.4 𝑥 73,000 From item no. 22
Rd = 3.48 in ≈ 3.5 in
= 12.2 in
The weight of a cubic inch of iron is 0.28 lb. From item no. 36
the total weight of iron below the teeth is
= 520.37 lbs.
Item # 1 -39 and fill up the table for the corresponding item.
note: For the computation of your design problem please refer to the table below. Just
change the load output with the load given with your name.
Total 10
Total 20
total 100%
Title page
Table of contents
WPU mission vision
CET mission vision
CET goals & objectives
EE objectives
Note:
All chapter & computation hand written, drawings (armature winding) -
AutoCAD, tables used – may be photocopied as attachment.
Select the correct answer for each of the following statements and place the
corresponding letter in the space provided.
1. A generator __________
a. changes electrical energy to mechanical energy.
b. changes mechanical energy to electrical energy.
c. is always self-excited.
d. is always separately excited.
5. what part of the Generator does not form the electrical circuit.
a. armature c. conductors
b. yoke d. commutator
6. what do you call the one that houses the armature conductors or coils and causes
them to rotate and hence cut the magnetic flux of the field magnets.
a. armature core c. field coils
b. yoke d. commutator
BOOKS
Siskind C.S. (1966), Electrical Machines, Direct and Alternating. Second Edition.
McGraw-Hill
Still A. Siskind C.S. (1954), Elements of Electrical Machine Design. Third Edition.
McGraw-Hill
Keljik J. (2009) Electricity 3. Power Generation and Delivery, Ninth Edition. Delmar.
WEB
https://www.generatorsource.com/Understanding-Generator-Labels.aspx
ARTICLES
Student’s Information
Name:
Program:
Year and Section:
Contact No.:
E-mail address:
Facebook Account:
Messenger Account:
Mission
WPU commits to develop quality human resource and green
technologies for a dynamic economy and sustainable
development through relevant instruction,
research and extension services.