Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Read the Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General by Santiago Alvarez and
The Revolt of the Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan by Teodoro Agoncillo and
examine their respective claims about the Tejeros Convention. You may answer the questions
in Tagalog or English. Remember, you will be graded based on the justification of your answer,
and not by number of words. Thank you!
Hi, Russell Ray. When you submit this form, the owner will see your name and email
address.
1.Test of Authenticity
SOURCE: Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General
Brief Description of the Source:
Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General was published by the Ateneo de
Manila University in 1992 and reprinted in 1996. The book talks about experience and
observations of the author as a general during the Philippine Revolution of which both
Katipunan and the government succeeded. Likewise, the source narrated the important events
and activities that happened in authors’ time.
1992
The book Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General by Santiago V. Alvarez
was published by the Ateneo de Manila University.
2.Test of Authenticity
SOURCE: The Revolt of the Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan
Brief Description of the Source:
The book initially espoused the idea of a nationalist historiography by contending that the
writing of Philippine must be in the Filipino point-of-view (Quibuyen, 2008). The Revolt of the
Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan was published by the College of Liberal
Arts of the University of the Philippines in 1956. Written by Teodoro Agoncillo, it is an in-depth
discussion on the Katipunan and the life history of its Supremo Andres Bonifacio through the
use of pertinent primary sources concerning the Philippine Revolution against Spain.
3.Test of Credibility
SOURCE: Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General
Objectives of the Event:
The main objective of the gathering is to discuss how to bolster the defenses in the
areas that are still under Magdiwang control. They also need to discuss the major issue they
face which is what kind of government they should have and how should the organize it.
Secretary Jacinto Lumbreras – From Magdiwang council. He signed the invitations for
the meeting and presided over the assembly. He also announced the main topic of the
discussion in the meeting.
Ariston Villanueva – Secretary of War of the Magdiwang Council.
Mr. Severino de las Alas – rose to speak and stated that they should discuss what kind
of government they will establish before the minor details.
Daniel Tirona – member of Magdalo Faction.
The author, Santiago Alvarez, is biased towards Magdiwang since he is a member of the
said faction. His perspective, observation, and knowledge are only limited in what
happened in the group of magdiwang.
Similarities and Difference with Other Independent:
The two source was different in terms of how the book was written. Although they have
the same plot (The Revolt of the Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan
was based on Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General).
The Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General is similar to The Revolt of
the Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan because The Revolt of the
Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan was based on the first mentioned
source.
*Testimonies:
PRIMARY SOURCE: Alvarez himself is a testimony for this book. He is the one who witnessed
all the events that was narrated in the book.
4.Test of Credibility
SOURCE: The Revolt of the Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan
Objectives of the Event:
The objective of the event is to establish what kind of revolutionary government they
needed because the two factions or group would never come to an understanding but
latter became an election for position of leaders. In addition, one of the things they need
to do in the gathering is to discuss how to defend the small area in Cavite against the
Spaniards.
The two source was different in terms of how the book was written. Although they have
the same plot (The Revolt of the Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan
was based on Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General).
The Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General is similar to The Revolt of
the Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan because The Revolt of the
Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan was based on the first mentioned
source making it a secondary source.
Teodoro Agoncillo’s The Revolt of the Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the
Katipunan is excerpt from Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General by
Santiago Alvarez
Santiago Alvarez is present in the gathering in Tejeros Convention while Teodoro
Agoncillo is not in the meeting as he was born years after the actual event happen.
The dates that are mentions in both sources are different by a gap of days.
5.*In your examination of the sources, what did you find out?
- Both sources, Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General and The
Revolt of the Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan, have the same plot,
setting and story. The only difference is how both sources are written by two different authors.
The Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General is written by Santiago Alvarez
which he himself witnessed and experienced the events that happened in the book. On the
other hand, The Revolt of the Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan written by
Teodoro A. Agoncillo, wrote the book which was excerpt or relied on Santiago’s book making it
as a secondary source.
- The two sources are different in terms of their biases. The first source is biased
towards a group while the second source is biased towards a single person.