You are on page 1of 6

Latest Trends on Systems - Volume I

A Seven-Term Novel 3-D Chaotic System with


Three Quadratic Nonlinearities and its
LABVIEW Implementation
Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan, Christos K. Volos, Ionnis M. Kyprianidis, Ioannis N. Stouboulos,
Karthikeyan Rajagopal, and Prasina Alexander

Chaos theory has important applications in a variety of


Abstract—This paper introduces a seven-term novel 3-D chaotic fields like lasers [17-18], oscillators [19-20], chemical systems
system with three quadratic nonlinearities and discusses its [21-22], biology [23-24], ecology [25-26], communications
qualitative properties. The new 3-D chaotic system has three unstable [27-28], cryptosystems [29-30], robotics [31-34], true random
equilibrium points. The Lyapunov exponents of the new chaotic
number generators [35], neural networks [36-38], etc.
system are obtained as L1 = 2.71916, L2 = 0 and L3 = –13.72776.
Hence, the maximal Lyapunov exponent (MLE) of the system is Since the pioneering works of Pecora and Carroll [39] and
obtained as L1 = 2.71916. The Lyapunov dimension of the new Ott, Grebogi and Yorke [40], chaos control and
chaotic system is obtained as DL = 2.19808. The qualitative properties synchronization problems have received significant attention
and the phase portraits of the novel chaotic system have been in the last two decades in the control literature [41-58].
described in detail. The paper also discusses the LabVIEW In this paper, we introduce a seven-term novel 3-D chaotic
implementation of the novel chaotic system.
system with three quadratic nonlinearities and discuss its
qualitative properties. The new 3-D chaotic system has three
Keywords—Chaos, stability theory, Lyapunov exponents,
LABVIEW. unstable equilibrium points (one saddle-point and two saddle-
foci).
I. INTRODUCTION The Lyapunov exponents of the new chaotic system are
obtained as: L1 = 2.71916, L2 = 0 and L3 = –13.72776.
C HAOS theory deals with theory and applications of chaotic
systems, which can be defined as nonlinear dynamical
systems, which are highly sensitive to small changes in the
Hence, the maximal Lyapunov exponent (MLE) of the
system is obtained as L1 = 2.71916. So, the Lyapunov
dimension of the new chaotic system is DL = 2.19808.
initial conditions of the states of the systems. Mathematically,
The qualitative properties and the phase portraits of the
chaotic dynamical systems are classified as nonlinear
novel chaotic system have been described in detail. Numerical
dynamical systems having at least one positive Lyapunov
simulations using MATLAB are provided to illustrate phase
exponent.
portraits and the qualitative properties of the novel chaotic
In 1963, Lorenz discovered a 3-D chaotic system [1], while
system.
he was studying weather patterns. This was followed by the
Finally, we detail LABVIEW implementation of the seven-
discovery of many 3-D polynomial chaotic systems such as
term novel chaotic system derived in this paper.
Rössler system [2], Rabinovich system [3], ACT system [4],
Chen system [5], Lü system [6], Liu system [7], Harb system
[8], Chen-Lee system [9], Cai system [10], Tigan system [11],
II. SEVEN-TERM NOVEL 3-D CHAOTIC SYSTEM
Pan system [12], Sundarapandian-Pehlivan system [13], Lu-
Xiao system [14], Vaidyanathan systems [15-16], etc. The 3-D dynamics of the seven-term novel 3-D chaotic
system with three quadratic nonlinearities is described by
x1 = a ( x2 − x1 ) + dx2 x3
2 bx1 − x1 x3
x= (1)
Dr. Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan is with the R & D Centre, Vel Tech =x3 x1 x2 − cx3
University, Avadi, Chennai-600 062, Tamil Nadu, India (phone: +91-
04426841622; FAX: +91-04426840605; e-mail: sundarvtu@gmail.com). where x1, x2, x3 are the states and a, b, c, d are positive
Dr. Christos K. Volos is with the Physics Department, Aristotle University parameters of the system.
of Thessaloniki, Greece (e-mail: chvolos@gmail.com).
Dr. Ioannis M. Kyprianidis is with the Physics Department, Aristotle The 3-D system (1) exhibits a chaotic attractor, when the
University of Thessaloniki, Greece (e-mail: imkypr@auth.gr). system parameter values are chosen as:
Dr. Ioannis N. Stouboulos is with the Physics Department, Aristotle = a 10,= b 15,= c 1,= d 12 (2)
University of Thessaloniki, Greece (e-mail: stouboulos@physics.auth.gr).
Dr. Karthikeyan Rajagopal is with the Velammal Institute of Technology, We take the initial conditions as:
Chennai-601 204, Tamil Nadu, India (e-mail: rkarthiekeyan@gmail.com). = x1 (0) 0.6,
= x2 (0) 1.8,
= x3 (0) 1.2 (3)
Dr. Prasina Alexander is with the Velammal Institute of Technology,
Chennai-601 204, Tamil Nadu, India (e-mail: prasialex@rediffmail.com). The 3-D portrait of the strange chaotic attractor (1) for the

ISBN: 978-1-61804-243-9 117


Latest Trends on Systems - Volume I

parameter values (2) and the initial conditions (3) is depicted


in Fig.1, and the 2-D portraits are depicted in Figs.2-4.

Fig. 4 2-D projection of the novel chaotic system in ( x1 , x3 ) − plane


Fig. 1 Strange attractor of the novel chaotic system in R 3

III. ANALYSIS OF THE NOVEL 3-D CHAOTIC SYSTEM


A. Symmetry and Invariance
It is easy to see that the system (1) is invariant under the
coordinates transformation
( x1 , x2 , x3 ) → ( − x1 , − x2 , x3 ) (4)
which persists for all values of the system parameters. Thus,
the system (1) has rotation symmetry about the x3-axis and any
non-trivial trajectory of the system (1) must have a twin
trajectory. It is also easy to see that the x3-axis is invariant
under the flow of the system (1).

B. Dissipativity
The system (1) can be expressed in vector notation as:
Fig. 2 2-D projection of the novel chaotic system in ( x1 , x2 ) − plane  f1 ( x) 
=x f=( x)  f 2 ( x)  (5)
 f 3 ( x) 
where
 f1 ( x) = a ( x2 − x1 ) + dx2 x3

 f2 (=x) bx1 − x1 x3 (6)
f =
 3 ( x) x1 x2 − cx3
The divergence of the vector field f on R 3 is given by
∂f1 ( x) ∂f 2 ( x) ∂f 3 ( x)
=
∇⋅ f + + (7)
∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3
We note that ∇ ⋅ f measures the rate at which volumes
change under the flow Φt of f.
Let D be a region in R 3 with a smooth boundary and let
D(t ) = Φ t ( D), the image of D under Φt , the time t map of the
flow of f. Let V(t) be the volume of D(t).
Fig. 3 2-D projection of the novel chaotic system in ( x2 , x3 ) − plane By Liouville’s theorem, we get
dV
( ∇ ⋅ f ) dx1dx2 dx3
dt D∫(t )
= (8)

For the system (1), we find that

ISBN: 978-1-61804-243-9 118


Latest Trends on Systems - Volume I

∂f1 ( x) ∂f 2 ( x) ∂f 3 ( x) Next, the Jacobian matrix at E2 is obtained as:


∇⋅ f = + + = −( a + c ) < 0 (9)
∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3  −10 190 10.6622 
=
J 2 J= 
( E2 )  0 0 −16.8819  (18)
because a and c are positive constants.
Substituting (9) into (8) and simplifying, we get 0.8885 16.8819 −1 
dV
= −(a + c) ∫ dx1dx2 dx3 = −(a + c)V (t ) (10) The eigenvalues of J2 are obtained as:
dt D (t ) λ1 =−15.7860, λ2,3 = 2.3930 ± 18.8508i (19)
Solving the first order linear differential equation (10), we which shows that E2 is a saddle-focus. Hence, E2 is unstable.
obtain the unique solution as Finally, the Jacobian matrix at E3 is obtained as:
− ( a + c )t
V (t ) = V (0)e (11)  −10 190 −10.6622 
Eq. (11) shows that any volume V(t) must shrink = J 3 J= 
( E3 )  0 0 16.8819  (20)
exponentially fast to zero with time.  −0.8885 −16.8819 −1 
Thus, the dynamical system described by (1) is a dissipative
system. The eigenvalues of J3 are obtained as:
As (1) is a dissipative system, all orbits of the system (1) are λ1 = −15.7860, λ2,3 = 2.3930 ± 18.8508i (21)
eventually confined to a specific subset of R 3 that has zero which shows that E3 is a saddle-focus. Hence, E3 is unstable.
volume. Hence, all the three equilibria of the system (1) are unstable.
Hence, the asymptotic motion of (1) settles onto an attractor
of the system (1). D. Lyapunov Exponents and Lyapunov Dimension
We take the parametric values for the system (1) as in
C. System Equilibria Eq.(12) and the initial conditions of the system (1) as:
We take the parametric values for the system (1) as in the x 1 (0) = 0.6, x2(0) = 1.8, x3(0) = 1.2 (22)
chaotic case, i.e. The Lyapunov exponents of the system (1) are obtained
=a 10,= b 15,= c 1,= d 12 (12) as:
To find the equilibria of the system (1), we solve the system L1 = 2.71916, L2 = 0, L3 = −13.72776 (23)
of nonlinear equations The maximal Lyapunov exponent (MLE) of the chaotic
 f1 ( x) = a ( x2 − x1 ) + dx2 x3 = 0 system is given by L1 = 2.71916. The Lyapunov dimension of
 the novel chaotic system is calculated as:
 f 2 ( x) =bx1 − x1 x3 =0 (13)
 f ( x) = x x − cx = 0 L + L2
 3 1 2 3
DL = 2+ 1 = 2.19808 (24)
L3
Solving the system (13), we obtain three equilibria
The dynamics of the Lyapunov exponents of the novel
0 16.88194   −16.88194  chaotic system (1) is shown in Fig.5.
E1= 0  , E2=  0.88852  , E3=  −0.88852  (14)
 0  15.00000   15.00000 
To investigate the stability type of the equilibria, we
determine the Jacobian matrix of the system (1) at the
equilibrium point x∗ as
 −a a + dx3∗ dx2∗ 
 
J ( x∗ ) = ∗
b − x3 0 − x1∗  (15)
 x2∗
x1∗ −c 

Thus, the Jacobian matrix at E1 is obtained as:
 −10 10 0 
=J1 J=( E1 )  15 0 0  (16)
 0 0 −1
The eigenvalues of J1 are obtained as:
λ1 =
−18.2288, λ2 =
−1, λ3 =
8.2288 (17)
which shows that E1 is a saddle point. Hence, E1 is unstable. Fig. 5 Lyapunov exponents of the novel chaotic system

ISBN: 978-1-61804-243-9 119


Latest Trends on Systems - Volume I

IV. LABVIEW IMPLEMENTATION AND SIMULATIONS OF THE


NOVEL CHAOTIC SYSTEM
In this section, the proposed novel chaotic system is
digitally implemented in LabVIEW. For implementing, the
Control and Simulation loop of LabVIEW is used. Figure 6
shows the implemented system using LabVIEW. Figures 7, 8
& 9 shows the time versus the states plot obtained from the
LabVIEW simulation.

Fig. 9 Time versus x3 of the novel chaotic system

Figures 10, 11 and 12 show the 2-D projection of the novel


chaotic system in (x1, x2)-plane, (x2, x3)-plane and (x1, x3)-
plane respectively.

Fig. 6 LabVIEW implementation of the novel chaotic system

Fig. 10 2-D projection of the novel chaotic system in (x1, x2)-plane

Fig. 7 Time versus x1 of the novel chaotic system

Fig. 8 Time versus x2 of the novel chaotic system Fig. 11 2-D projection of the novel chaotic system in (x2, x3)-plane

ISBN: 978-1-61804-243-9 120


Latest Trends on Systems - Volume I

[14] H. Lu and X. Xiao, “Analysis of a novel autonomous 3-D chaotic


system,” International Journal of Advancements in Computing
Technology, vol. 4(1), pp. 248–255, 2012.
[15] S. Vaidyanathan, “A new six-term 3-D chaotic system with an
exponential nonlinearity,” Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences,
vol. 79(1), pp. 135–143, 2013.
[16] S. Vaidyanathan, “A new eight-term 3-D polynomial chaotic system
with three quadratic nonlinearities,” Far East Journal of Mathematical
Sciences, vol. 84(2), pp. 219–226, 2014.
[17] J. Hu, K. Jia, and J. Ma, “Chaos synchronization and encoding in
coupled semiconductor lasers of multiple modulated time delays,” Optik
- International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, vol. 122(23), pp.
2071–2074, 2011.
[18] G. Yuan, X. Zhang, and Z. Wang, “Generation and synchronization of
feedback-induced chaos in semiconductor ring lasers by injection-
locking,” Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics,
vol. 125(8), pp. 1950–1953, 2014.
[19] J. Kengne, J. C. Chedjou, G. Kenne, and K. Kyamakya, “Dynamical
properties and chaos synchronization of improved Colpitts oscillators,”
Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol.
17(7), pp. 2914–2923, 2012.
Fig. 12 2-D projection of the novel chaotic system in (x1, x3)-plane [20] S. Sabarathinam, K. Thamilmaran, L. Borkowski, P. Perlikowski, P.
Brzeski, A. Stefanski, and T. Kapitaniak, “Transient chaos in two
coupled, dissipatively perturbed Hamiltonian Duffing oscillators,”
Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol.
V. CONCLUSION 1811), pp. 3098–3107, 2013.
[21] Y. Gong, Y. Xie, X. Lin, Y. Hao, and X. Ma, “Ordering chaos and
In this paper we have proposed a Novel chaotic system with synchronization transitions by chemical delay and coupling on scale-free
three quadratic non linearities. The proposed system is then neuronal networks,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 43, pp. 96–103,
proved for the properties of being a chaotic system. The 2010.
[22] M. Villegas, F. Augustin, A. Gilg, A. Hmaidi, and U. Wever,
Lyapunov exponents of the system are “Application of the polynomial chaos expansion to the simulation of
L1 = 2.71916, L2 = 0, L3 = −13.72776 . The proposed system chemical reactors with uncertainties,” Mathematics and Computers in
Simulation, vol. 82(5), pp. 805–817, 2012.
is then digitally implemented in LabVIEW using control and [23] M. Kyriazis, “Applications of chaos theory to the molecular biology of
simulation loop. The state portraits and time varying behavior aging,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 26(6), pp. 569–572, 1991.
of the proposed system are studied using LabVIEW. [24] S. Das, D. Goswami, S. Chatterjee, and S. Mukherjee, “Stability and
chaos analysis of a novel swarm dynamics with applications to multi-
agent systems,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol.
30, pp. 189–198, 2014.
REFERENCES [25] J. C. Sprott, J. A. Vano, J. C. Wildenberg, M. B. Anderson, and J. K.
Noel, “Coexistence and chaos in complex ecologies,” Physics Letters A,
[1] E. N. Lorenz, “Deterministic nonperiodic flow,” J. Atmospheric vol. 335(2-3), pp. 207–212, 2005.
Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 130–141, 1963. [26] B. Sahoo and S. Poria, “The chaos and control of a food chain model
[2] O. E. Rössler, “An equation for continuous chaos,” Physics Letters, vol. supplying additional food to top-predator,” Chaos, Solitons and
57A(5), pp. 397–398, 1976. Fractals, vol. 58, pp. 52-64, 2014.
[3] M. I. Rabinovich and A. L. Fabrikant, “Stochastic self-modulation of [27] O. I. Moskalenko, A. A. Koronovskii, and A. E. Hramov, “Generalized
waves in nonequilibrium media,” Sov. Phys. JETP, vol. 50(2), pp. 311– synchronization of chaos for seure communication: Remarkable stability
317, 1979. to noise,” Physics Letters A, vol. 374(29), pp. 2925–2931, 2010.
[4] A. Arneodo, P. Coullet, and C. Tresser, “Possible new strange attractors [28] N. Li, W. Pan, L. Yan, B. Luo, and X. Zou, “Enhanced chaos
with spiral structure,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. synchronization and communication in cascade-coupled semiconductor
79, pp. 573–579, 1981. ring lasers,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical
[5] G. Chen and T. Ueta, “Yet another chaotic attractor,” International Simulation, vol. 19(6), pp. 1874–1883, 2014.
Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 9, pp. 1465–1466, 1999. [29] R. Rhouma and S. Belghith, “Cryptanalysis of a chaos-based
[6] J. Lü and G. Chen, “A new chaotic attractor coined,” International cryptosystem on DSP,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and
Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 12, pp. 659–661, 2002. Numerical Simulation, vol. 16(2), pp. 876–884, 2011.
[7] C. Liu, T. Liu, L. Liu, and K. Liu, “A new chaotic attractor,” Chaos, [30] X. Wu, C. Bai, and H. Kan, “A new color image cryptosystem via
Solitons and Fractals, vol. 22, pp. 1031–1038, 2004. hyperchaos synchronization,” Communications in Nonlinear Science
[8] A. M. Harb, “Nonlinear chaos control in permanent magnet reluctance and Numerical Simulation, vol. 19(6), pp. 1884–1897, 2014.
machine,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 19, pp. 1217–1224, 2004. [31] Ch. K. Volos, I. M. Kyrpianidis, and I. N. Stouboulos, “A chaotic path
[9] H. K. Chen and C. I. Lee, “Anti-control of chaos in rigid body motion,” planning generator for autonomous mobile robots,” Robotics and
Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 21, pp. 957–965, 2004. Autonomous Systems, vol. 60(4), pp. 651-656, 2012.
[10] G. Cai and Z. Tan, “Chaos synchronization of a new chaotic system via [32] Ch. K. Volos, I. M. Kyprianidis, and I. N. Stouboulos, “Experimental
nonlinear control,” Journal of Uncertain Systems, vol. 1(3), pp. 235– investigation on coverage performance of a chaotic autonomous mobile
240, 2007. robot,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 61(12), pp. 1314–1322,
[11] G. Tigan and D. Opris, “Analysis of a 3D chaotic system,” Chaos, 2013.
Solitons and Fractals, vol. 36, pp. 1315–1319, 2008. [33] Ch. K. Volos, N. G. Bardis, I. M. Kyprianidis, and I. N. Stouboulos,
[12] L. Pan, D. Xu, and W. Zhou, “Controlling a novel chaotic attractor using “Motion control of a mobile robot based on double-scroll chaotic
linear feedback,” Journal of Information and Computing Science, vol. circuits,” WSEAS Trans. Systems, vol. 11(9), pp. 479–488, 2012.
5(2), pp. 117–124, 2010. [34] Ch. K. Volos, N. G. Bardis, I. M. Kyprianidis and I. N. Stouboulos,
[13] V. Sundarapandian and I. Pehlivan, “Analysis, control, synchronization “Implementation of Mobile Robot by Using Double-Scroll Chaotic
and circuit design of a novel chaotic system,” Mathematical and Attractors,” In Recent Researches in Applications of Electrical and
Computer Modelling, vol. 55(7-8), pp. 1904–1915, 2012. Computer Engineering, Proc. of 11th International Applications of
Electrical Engineering, pp. 119–124, 2012, Vouliagmeni, Greece.

ISBN: 978-1-61804-243-9 121


Latest Trends on Systems - Volume I

[35] N. G. Bardis, A. P. Markovskyi, N. Doukas, and N. V. Karadimas, “True control,” International Journal of Soft Computing, vol. 7(1), pp. 28–37,
random number generation based on environmental noise measurements 2012.
for military applications,” Mathematics And Computers In Science and [48] V. Sundarapandian and I. Pehlivan, “Analysis, control, synchronization
Engineering archive, Proce. of the 8th WSEAS International Conference and circuit design of a novel chaotic system,” Mathematical and
on Signal Processing, Robotics and Automation, pp. 68–73, 2009, Computer Modelling, vol. 55(7-8), pp. 1904–1915, 2012.
Cambridge, UK. [49] J. H. Park and O. M. Kwon, “A novel criterion for delayed feedback
[36] G. He, Z. Cao, P. Zhu, and H. Ogura, “Controlling chaos in a chaotic control of time-delay chaotic systems,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol.
neural network,” Neural Networks, vol. 16(8), pp. 1195–1200, 2003. 23, pp. 495–501, 2005.
[37] G. He. M. D. Shrimali, and K. Aihara, “Threshold control of chaotic [50] T. Yang and L. O. Chua, “Control of chaos using sampled-data feedback
neural network,” Neural Networks, vol. 21(2-3), pp. 114–121, 2008. control,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 9, pp.
[38] E. Kaslik and S. Sivasundaram, “Nonlinear dynamics and chaos in 215–219, 1999.
fractional-order neural networks,” Neural Networks, vol. 32, pp. 245– [51] S. H. Lee, V. Kapila, M. Porfri, and A. Panda, “Master-slave
256, 2012. synchronization of continuously and intermittently coupled sampled-
[39] L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, “Synchronization in chaotic systems,” data chaotic oscillators,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and
Physical Review Letters, vol. 64(8), pp. 821–824, 1990. Numerical Simulation, vol. 15, pp. 4100–4113, 2010.
[40] E. Ott, C. Grebogi, and J.A. Yorke, “Controlling chaos,” Physical [52] V. Sundarapandian, “Adaptive backstepping controller and synchronizer
Review Letters, vol. 64(11), pp. 1196–1199, 1990. design for Arneodo chaotic system with unknown parameters,”
[41] M. Lakshmanan, and K. Murali, Nonlinear Oscillators: Controlling and International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology,
Synchronization. Singapore: World Scientific, 1996. vol. 4(6), pp 145–159, 2012.
[42] L. Lu, C. Zhang and Z. A. Guo, “Synchronization between two different [53] V. Sundarapandian, “Anti-synchronizing backstepping control design
chaotic systems with nonlinear feedback control,” Chinese Physics, vol. for Arneodo chaotic system,” International Journal of Bioinformatics
16, pp. 1603–1607, 2007. and Biosciences, vol. 3(1), pp. 21–33, 2013.
[43] U. E. Vincent, “Synchronization of identical and non-identical 4-D [54] V. Sundarapandian and S. Sivaperumal, “Sliding controller design of
chaotic systems via active control,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 37, hybrid synchronization of four-wing chaotic systems,” International
pp. 1065–1075, 2008. Journal of Soft Computing, vol. 6(5), pp. 224–231, 2011.
[44] S. Vaidyanathan and K. Rajagopal, “Hybrid synchronization of [55] S. Vaidyanathan and S. Sampath, “Anti-synchronization of four-wing
hyperchaotic Wang-Chen and hyperchaotic Lorenz systems by active chaotic systems,” International Journal of Automation and Computing,
non-linear control,” International Journal of Systems Signal Control and vol. 9(3), pp. 274–279, 2012.
Engineering Application, vol. 4(3), pp. 55–61, 2011. [56] S. Vaidyanathan and S. Sampath, “Sliding mode controller design for
[45] S. H. Chen and J. Lü, “Synchronization of an uncertain unified system the global chaos synchronization of Coullet systems,” International
via adaptive control,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 14, pp. 643–647, Journal of Information Sciences and Techniques, vol. 2(2), pp. 65–76,
2002. 2012.
[46] V. Sundarapandian and R. Karthikeyan, “Anti-synchronization of Lu [57] J. Wang, D. Lu, and L. Tian, “Global synchronization for time delay of
and Pan chaotic systems by adaptive nonlinear control,” International WINDMI system,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 30, pp. 629–-635,
Journal of Soft Computing, vol. 6(4), pp. 111–118, 2011. 2006.
[47] S. Vaidyanathan and K. Rajagopal, “Global chaos synchronization of [58] W. Hahn, The Stability of Motion, New York: Springer, 1967.
hyperchaotic Pang and hyperchaotic Wang systems via adaptive
.

ISBN: 978-1-61804-243-9 122

You might also like