Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jayde Final Evaluation
Jayde Final Evaluation
Wyatt Academy
COOPERATING SCHOOL NAME:
Colorado
SCHOOL STATE:
Ayah Attal
COOPERATING TEACHER/MENTOR NAME:
Jayde is very caring and attentive to students. She meets students' needs and adapts well to small-group learning situations. Jayde works hard to give clear direct
expectations and concepts and then makes sure students are meeting those expectations. While students do their seat work Jayde moves around the room
offering support to every student. Due to time restraints, Jayde feels that she may be able to give each student as much support as she would like when teaching in
larger groups so gives them cues and hints using prior knowledge and guides them with problem-solving strategies. She also encourages the higher level learners
to assist those who need extra help. Jayde engages each student's critical thinking skills and leads them in open-ended questions before each lesson and during
seat time. She is very encouraging with students as they work through their activities.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Fairness Score
Teacher candidates should promote social justice and equity, maintain appropriate standards of confidentiality, and exercise fairness in all areas
including assessment. 96
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Students are treated fairly and equally in Jayde's classroom. Students receive equal assistance at all times. All students receive equal time with Jayde whenever
needed. No student is allowed to mistreat or bully another.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Jayde guides students with expected and good behavior guidelines. Jayde is a very positive role model in the classroom and motivates and encourages individual
students throughout the day. She demonstrates patience and reasonable attention without disregarding the entire class. Expectations are explicitly given to
students about behavior as well as work habits. Jayde encourages students to build relationships with each other and help others when needed or just to be kind.
Jayde understands how important her role in the community and with families is so presents herself properly and well in all circumstances.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Reflection Score
Teacher candidates should recognize that reflection combined with experience leads to growth as a professional. Educators should be thoughtful about
their professional practice, critically examine it, and seek continual improvement. 95
Evidence
((The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Jayde reflects daily on the lessons and learning taking place in her classroom. She welcomes feedback from others and reaches out to admin for additional
support. and applies new knowledge learned from that feedback.
She has grown as an educator and as a learner. Her teaching, classroom management, and lesson planning have improved considerably since we implemented the
Professional Growth Plan.
Jayde works each day on improving her classroom management and on making sure students are learning. During her lessons, she thinks about ways she can
improve them and the best management techniques. She considers her mentor teachers' feedback continually and applies it as much as possible. Jayde is
confident in her own personal qualities and knows they help her be more effective in instruction. Jayde has experienced a lot of growth this semester.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Curiosity Score
Teacher candidates should promote and support curiosity and encourage active inquiry.
95
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Jayde constantly encourages and motivates her students. She teaches them skills for dealing with personal and academic problems as they work their way through
lessons and activities. She teaches them how to problem solve and engages them in activities that help with that concept. Jayde asks open-ended questions and
facilitates discussions to encourage inquiry.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Honesty Score
Teacher candidates should model integrity by their words and actions.
95
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Jayde is honest and open with her students. She is patient and consistent in instruction and classroom relationships. Jayde does not speak unkindly toward or
about any other person but is constantly positive and encouraging in her interactions with students, staff, families and community.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Compassion Score
Teacher candidates should demonstrate professional friendliness, warmth, and genuine caring in their relationships with others while providing
intellectual, emotional, and spiritual support. 91
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Jayde is a little reserved with people she does not know. She is getting more relaxed and friendly with me after this amount of time. She is friendly and positive with
other staff in her building. She is very caring, kind, and compassionate with her students which is evident in her interactions with them. As she becomes more
experienced in the classroom, I believe she will relax and come across friendly with people she is just meeting.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Advocacy Score
Teacher candidates understand the impact of community involvement and servant leadership as it applies to the welfare of others in the educational
setting. 92
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Jayde fully understands the impact being involved with the community has and how important servant leadership is. During the summer she teaches classes on
Horticulture and gardening in the community building relationships. She is very shy and reserved but at the same time very kind and considerate. She should work
on opening herself more for possible friendships and relationships in the community.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Dedication Score
Teacher candidates should be committed to the profession of teaching and learning.
93
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Jayde is very committed to the profession of teaching and learning. In the summers she teaches classes in the community on gardening and other areas. She truly
works hard to be a good teacher and truly wants to do the best she can. Each day Jayde tries to ensure each student feels safe and comfortable in the learning
environment. She tries to make sure each student learns and enjoys the learning. Jayde is good about teaching students correct attitude and behaviors in subtle
ways all day.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Jayde has improved in lesson planning and management in the past couple of months. She has grown as an educator very much. Her lessons are more focused
and on target, and she is better able to consider assessments when planning. Jayde reflects often on how her lessons can be better, how she can improve learning
and understanding, and how better apply lessons to individual learning styles. Jayde is very good at collaborating with families, colleagues and other professionals
on her students behalf.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Jayde still struggles a little with pacing the learning environment. She actively and equitably engages students academically and socially but needs to work a little
more on coordinating time, space, and student attention. It is difficult for her with large groups to stay on task and manage behavior but she is improving on this.
She is very respectful and responsive to all students no matter what they bring with them to the learning environment. However, Jayde did not have as much time in
total control of the classroom as a typical student-teacher does. I believe as she gains more experience she will improve on this as well.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Jayde should spend more time with student reflection and linking the concepts and making connections with student's experiences prior to lessons. She continually
fills pressure about time in this format. Students rotate from classroom to classroom much like middle schoolers do. This is so they have teachers who specialize in
certain areas teaching only those subjects so she doesn't have as much time as she needs to build on this concept.
Jayde uses many resources and technology effectively to make lessons more relevant for students. Jayde provides varied opportunities for students to learn,
practice, and master academic language. She encourages students to be explorers in learning and to be creative.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Jayde uses a technique for developing perspectives by having different student volunteers come to the front of the room and show the class how they solved a
problem so students demonstrate learning and others learn from them. Jayde does well in applying content knowledge to real-world problems in her literacy
circles. As students read and reflect on the reading they relate the story to real-world and global issues.
Jayde helps students develop social and cultural perspectives in everyday language and interaction with others. She also helps students problem-solve as occasions
come up in the classroom rather it be academic or social.
I believe Jayde should develop the habit of brainstorming before each lesson to check for prior learning and understanding and to build a foundation for the lesson.
Then move forward with the lesson checking for understanding as she goes. At the end of the lesson, she should wrap up by reviewing the concepts and once again
check for understanding. I feel she should also demonstrate often the activities and the concepts of the activities. In this manner, students would fully understand
what they are to do with the activity and apply it to the instruction. There are many time restrictions on Jayde because of the learning format adopted by the school
but still, she should take her time even if it means they don't get all the way through the lesson.
.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Jayde uses formative assessments after each lesson as exit tickets. She checks understanding of concepts and connections as well as the learning activity to make
sure the concepts learned are accurate and what they are supposed to learn from that lesson. If not she can correct immediately any misunderstandings. Later she
uses summative assessments to measure overall learning.
Jayde uses mandatory formal assessments provided by the curriculum. This ensures her lessons are aligned with state standards and learning objectives. She does
comprehensive checks throughout the lesson and activity to see if she needs to reteach or re-state any objective.
.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Jayde uses a curriculum provided by the district for student instruction. These lessons include goals, strategies, and accommodations for students. Jayde makes
adjustments and other resources to differentiate instruction. Sequencing of the lessons allows students to confirm prior learning and begin learning the new
material.
peers. Students are allowed an opportunity to better understand the questions during independent work.
Jayde uses mandatory formal assessments provided by the curriculum. This ensures her lessons are aligned with state standards and learning objectives. She does
comprehensive checks throughout the lesson and activity to see if she needs to reteach or re-state any objective.
.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Jayde is an instructor when teaching the lesson and modeling work on the board, etc. When students are doing seat work, she is a facilitator in that she actively
walks around and checks for and additional help or explanation needed. She is an audience member when students are demonstrating their learning or reading out
loud, etc.
Jayde is always a coach by encouraging students and explaining and modifying lessons to meet their learning levels.
I believe Jayde should use more technology tools and outside resources but I believe she is not allowed to do so by her administration as they have a set curriculum
they want teachers to abide by. When she gets her own classroom hopefully she will be able to do this.
I feel Jayde could ask more questions to stimulate discussion. But again, she has strict time constraints so that may hinder this process.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Again Jayde is required to use a particular curriculum and program. She uses Eureka math books and the NY Common Core slides to plan math practices. Jayde does reteach if the
majority of students are struggling and she works often with small groups. Jayde collaborates with colleagues, uses data, and works with a team to adapt planning and practice.
Jayde loves to learn and seeks out every opportunity to learn at work, in the community, and otherwise. She works in the community teaching in programs for all ages and is active in
community events.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Jayde would most likely use more tools and communication strategies if she were able to but has restrictions on what she can use. I believe when she begins
working in another school she will seek out and use other research and tools to build local and global learning communities that engage students.
Jayde is a strong advocate for her students and works to improve their learning environment. Hopefully she will become a great catalyst for system change in the
future.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Jayde understands how important formative and summative assessments are for student learning. She uses formative assessments daily to be sure students have
learned what she wants them to learn from that lesson. She is able and capable of using all forms of assessment including state and federal standards for learning.
She is aware of techniques and ways she can use these assessments for instruction.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
NASD 3a Score
Ability to teach dance at various levels to different age groups and in a variety of classroom, studio, and ensemble settings in ways that develop knowledge
of how dance works syntactically as a communication medium and developmentally as an agent of civilization. This set of abilities includes effective
classroom, studio, and rehearsal management.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 3b Score
An understanding of child growth and development and an understanding of principles of learning as they relate to dance.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
NASD 3c Score
The ability to assess aptitudes, experiential backgrounds, orientations of individuals and groups of students, and the nature of subject matter, and to plan
educational programs to meet assessed needs.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 3d Score
Knowledge of current methods, materials, and repertories available in various fields and levels of dance education appropriate to the teaching
specialization.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
NASD 3e Score
The ability to accept, amend, or reject methods and materials based on personal assessment of specific teaching situations.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 3f Score
Basic understanding of the principles and methods of developing curricula and the short- and long-term units that comprise them.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
NASD 3g Score
An understanding of evaluative techniques and ability to apply them in assessing both the progress of students in dance and the objectives and
procedures of the curriculum.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 5a Score
Students should engage in observation and discussion of field-based teaching/learning experiences in diverse settings.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
NASD 5b Score
Students should be provided opportunities for various types of teaching and directed observation throughout the degree program.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 5c Score
Teaching opportunities should be provided in actual pre-kindergarten, kindergarten, elementary, middle, and secondary settings, as appropriate for the
student’s certification level.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
NASD 5d Score
The choice of practice teaching sites must enable students to develop competencies consistent with standards outlined above, and must be approved by
qualified dance personnel from the degree-granting institution.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 5e Score
Sites and situations for student teaching and students must be supervised by qualified dance personnel from the degree-granting institution and, when
possible, the cooperating schools.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Early Childhood Placements: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets this Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this standard and expectations consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations for standard and expectations for this standard and expectations standard and expectations for for a Teacher Candidate standard and all expectations
a Teacher Candidate during a Teacher Candidate during for a Teacher Candidate a Teacher Candidate during during student teaching. for a Teacher Candidate
student teaching. student teaching. during student teaching. student teaching. during student teaching.
NAEYC Standard 1: Promoting Child Development and Learning Score
Students prepared in early childhood degree programs are grounded in a child development knowledge base. They use their understanding of young
children’s characteristics and needs and of the multiple interacting influences on children’s development and learning to create environments that are
healthy, respectful, supportive, and challenging for each child.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Early Childhood Placements: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
NAEYC Standard 3: Observing, Documenting, and Assessing to Support Young Children and Families Score
Students prepared in early childhood degree programs understand that child observations, documentation, and other forms of assessment are central to the practice of all early
childhood professionals. They know about and understand the goals, benefits, and uses of assessment. They know about and use systematic observations, documentation, and
other effective assessment strategies in a responsible way, in partnership with families and other professionals, to positively influence the development of every child.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NAEYC Standard 4: Using Developmentally Effective Approaches to Connect with Children and Families Score
Students prepared in early childhood degree programs understand that teaching and learning with young children is a complex enterprise, and its details vary depending on
children’s ages, characteristics, and the settings within which teaching and learning occur. They understand and use positive relationships and supportive interactions as the
foundation for their work with young children and families. Students know, understand, and use a wide array of developmentally appropriate approaches, instructional
strategies, and tools to connect with children and families and positively influence each child’s development and learning.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Early Childhood Placements: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Early Childhood Placements: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
NAEYC Standard 6: Becoming a Professional Score
Students prepared in early childhood degree programs identify and conduct themselves as members of the early childhood profession. They know and use ethical guidelines
and other professional standards related to early childhood practice. They are continuous, collaborative learners who demonstrate knowledgeable, reflective, and critical
perspectives on their work, making informed decisions that integrate knowledge from a variety of sources. They are informed advocates for sound educational practices and
policies.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Special Education Placements: Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this standard and consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations standard and expectations this standard and expectations standard and expectations for expectations for a Teacher standard and all expectations
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate a Teacher Candidate during Candidate during student for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching. during student teaching. during student teaching. student teaching. teaching. during student teaching.
Special Education Placements: Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
CEC Standard 3: Curricular Content Knowledge Score
Beginning special education professionals use knowledge of general and specialized curricula to individualize learning for individuals with
exceptionalities.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Special Education Placements: Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Special Education Placements: Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
CEC Standard 6: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice Score
Beginning special education professionals use foundational knowledge of the field and their professional ethical principles and practice standards to inform
special education practice, to engage in lifelong learning, and to advance the profession.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this standard and consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations standard and expectations for this standard and expectations standard and expectations expectations for a Teacher standard and all expectations
for a Teacher Candidate a Teacher Candidate during for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate Candidate during student for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching. student teaching. during student teaching. during student teaching. teaching. during student teaching.
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Jayde has her previous knowledge and education to help with these types of lessons. In this school, she was not able to teach science so I was not able to observe but she loves science and math and hopes to teach more of these subjects in the future.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Jayde herself is at a very high level in Math but I feel she sometimes has trouble breaking the math down to the level of very young children. I believe she would do very well teaching these concepts at a higher grade level.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
ACEI Standard 2.4: Social Studies Score
Candidates know, understand, and use the major concepts and modes of inquiry from the social studies—the integrated study of history, geography, the
social sciences, and other related areas—to promote elementary students’ abilities to make informed decisions as citizens of a culturally diverse
democratic society and interdependent world.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Teachers do not teach social studies in this school either but Jayde has a very high level of education of her own.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NA
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
ACEI Standard 2.6: Health Education Score
Candidates know, understand, and use the major concepts in the subject matter of health education to create opportunities for student development and
practice of skills that contribute to good health.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Not observed
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
ACEI Standard 3.1: Integrating and Applying Knowledge for Instruction Score
Candidates plan and implement instruction based on knowledge of students, learning theory, connections across the curriculum, curricular goals, and
community 92
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Jayde plans and implements instruction based on learning theories, connections across the curriculum, curricular goals, and community.
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
ACEI Standard 3.3: Development of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Score
Candidates understand and use a variety of teaching strategies that encourage elementary students’ development of critical thinking and problem solving.
91
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
I do wish that Jayde would have experienced a classroom where she would have been able to do this more often but she does try to use a variety of strategies as she teaches. She integrates critical thinking and problem solving often.
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
ACEI Standard 3.5: Communication to Foster Collaboration Score
Candidates use their knowledge and understanding of effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication techniques to foster active inquiry,
collaboration, and supportive interaction in the elementary classroom. 91
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Jayde is very effective with using verbal and nonverbal cues when interacting with students. She fosters inquiry, collaboration and is very supportive.
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Jayde is very aware and reflects often on how her professional decisions and actions affect students, families, the learning community and the community. She loves to learn and seeks out opportunities to do so.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Elementary ESL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this standard and consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations standard and expectations this standard and expectations standard and expectations for expectations for a Teacher standard and all expectations
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate a Teacher Candidate during Candidate during student for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching. during student teaching. during student teaching. student teaching. teaching. during student teaching.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Standard 3.a. Planning for Standards-Based ESL and Content Instruction Score
Candidates know, understand, and apply concepts, research, and best practices to plan classroom instruction in a supportive learning environment for
ELLs. They plan for multilevel classrooms with learners from diverse backgrounds using standards-based ESL and content curriculum.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Standard 3.b. Implementing and Managing Standards-Based ESL and Content Instruction Score
Candidates know, manage, and implement a variety of standards-based teaching strategies and techniques for developing and integrating English
listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Candidates support ELLs access to the core curriculum by teaching language through academic content.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Elementary ESL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Standard 3.c. Using Resources and Technology Effectively in ESL and Content Instruction Score
Candidates are familiar with a wide range of standards-based materials, resources, and technologies, and choose, adapt, and use them in effective ESL and
content teaching.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Elementary ESL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Standard 4.c. Classroom-Based Assessment for ESL Score
Candidates know and can use a variety of performance-based assessment tools and techniques to inform instruction in the classroom.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
1.6 Prospective business teachers move beyond the boundaries of the classroom to assume responsibility as an advocate and promoter of the profession
in the community, state, and nation.
1.7 Prospective business teachers projects a positive professional image that personifies the discipline itself and exemplifies the goals and ideals of the
profession.
1.8 Prospective business teachers base all interaction on principles of respect, fairness, and ethics.
1.9 Prospective business teachers articulates the importance of professional standards in program development.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
2.2 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that reflect local, state, and national standards.
2.3 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that consists of achievement standards, performance expectations, and assessment.
2.4 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that consists of sequential integrated learning experiences.
2.5 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that provides for delivery of content in a developmentally appropriate manner.
2.6 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that includes the development of knowledge, skills and attitudes.
2.7 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that encourages students to use reflective thinking, problem solving, and other higher level thinking
skills.
2.8 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that includes multidisciplinary approaches.
2.9 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that serves the needs of diverse populations.
2.10 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that enables students to make a transition from school to career.
2.11 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that focuses on continuous quality education.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
3.2 Prospective business teachers employ a variety of instructional strategies to engage all students in the learning process.
3.3 Prospective business teachers facilitate collaborative learning that may include students, teachers, business and community representatives, and
others.
3.4 Prospective business teachers demonstrate effective communication skills to facilitate learning.
3.5 Prospective business teachers help all students realize their full potential.
3.6 Prospective business teachers use a variety of media to enhance and expand learning opportunities.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
4.2 Prospective business teachers use multiple forms of assessment to obtain accurate measures of student progress including formal, informal and
authentic measures.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
6.2 Prospective business teachers recognize that the student organization provides opportunities to involve the business and professional community in
support of the goals of the business education program.
6.3 Prospective business teachers recognize that the student-directed operation of the organization provides opportunities for personal growth and
leadership development.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Standard 7: Score
7.1 Prospective business teachers base all communication on principles of respect, fairness, and honesty, and understands that building relationships
depends on these foundations.
7.2 Prospective business teachers exhibit an understanding of communication as a dynamic system of people, processes, cultures, media, and fluid
boundaries in developing strategies.
7.3 Prospective business teachers demonstrate effective communication skills to facilitate learning.
7.4 Prospective business teachers incorporate quality standards in all forms of communication.
7.5 Prospective business teachers serve as an ambassador for business education with all stakeholders.
7.6 Prospective business teachers recognize that culture impacts business communication.
7.7 Prospective business teachers use a variety of media to enhance and expand communication opportunities.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Standard 8: Score
8.1 Prospective business teachers communicate effectively with all stakeholders by understanding communication as a dynamic system of people,
cultures, and media.
8.2 Prospective business teachers recognize that student achievement is a collaborative effort among a variety of stakeholders.
8.3 Prospective business teachers build professional relationships with stakeholders to create a learning environment in which students move
continuously and easily between school and community to facilitate the learning process.
8.4 Prospective business teachers develop partnerships with members of the educational, business and other communities to improve programs, develop
new programs, provide student access to learning to learning opportunities, and ensure a curriculum based on real world experiences.
8.5 Prospective business teachers build professional relationships with all stakeholders based on trust, respect, ethical standards, and mutual benefits to
earn commitment, dedicated involvement, visible advocacy, and financial support.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Standard 9: Score
9.1 Prospective business teachers assist students in adjusting to and functioning effectively in educational and business environments.
9.2 Prospective business teachers help students discover their potential for intellectual, personal, social and emotional growth.
9.3 Prospective business teachers help students make decisions regarding careers and career transitions.
9.4 Prospective business teachers collaborate with student support services when appropriate.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
10.3 Prospective business teachers demonstrate the knowledge and skills in educational foundations, teaching-learning theory, learning styles,
exceptionalities, instructional strategies, assessment techniques, and field experiences to effectively teach business education.
10.4 Prospective business teachers gain real life experience in the application of business knowledge and skills.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
NCTE Standard 1: English Language Arts (ELA) Candidate Program Structure Score
Candidates follow a specific curriculum and are expected to meet appropriate performance assessments for preservice
English language arts teachers.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this standard and consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations standard and expectations this standard and expectations standard and expectations expectations for a Teacher standard and all expectations
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate during for a Teacher Candidate Candidate during student for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching. during student teaching. student teaching. during student teaching. teaching. during student teaching.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
NCSS Theme 5: Individuals, Groups, and Institutions Score
Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the
appropriate school level for the study of interactions among individuals, groups, and institutions.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
NCSS Theme 9: Global Connections Score
Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to provide instruction at the appropriate
school level for the study of global connections and interdependence.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Physical Education Placements: Society of Health and Physical Educators (SHAPE) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this standard and consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations standard and expectations this standard and expectations standard and expectations expectations for a Teacher standard and all expectations
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate Candidate during student for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching. during student teaching. during student teaching. during student teaching. teaching. during student teaching.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
INSTRUCTIONS
Please review the "Total Scored Percentage" for accuracy and add any attachments before completing the "Agreement and Signature" section.
I attest this submission is accurate, true, and in compliance with GCU policy guidelines, to the best of my ability to do so.
SCORING SUMMARY
GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners InTASC Standards Specialized Professional Association Standards
Score Score Score
When deciding what to teach I refer to the outlines schedule of lesson plans and learning
objec:ves. We try our best to s:ck to this plan as well as allow students modifica:ons or extra
:me to prac:ce skills they have not mastered. This allows us to follow our state standards,
grade benchmarks, and adhere to student needs based on their evalua:ons to reach their
comprehension effec:vely. Following a curriculum outlines allows me to know what it is I am
teaching, have taught, and will be teaching in the future.
I use assessments to gain insight on student’s skill levels. Assessments are usually related to
skills they have been prac:cing, so when assessing students on material it makes it easier to see
which students comprehend the topics and which students are s:ll struggling. If a handful of
students demonstrate confusion then I will pull them aside for a small group review of the
material while the rest fo the class works independently on more material. I will go over the
assessment with the struggling students showing them how they could have correctly answered
each ques:on and explaining my reasoning. Then I will give these students the same
assessment but with different numbers or words to reassess if my small group re- teach was
actually effec:ve. If it was not then I will need to reevaluate the skills these students are
needing to improve on and their individual learning styles. If they do good on their second try
then I know they do have comprehension and just needed more prac:ce or more personalized
dialogue about the material.
I use mandatory formal assessments provided by the curriculum we follow in class. This insures
my assessments align with the state standards and learning objec:ves of our unit. I also
consider that there are inherent learning gaps so to give every student the same exact
assessment is not equitable. For lower level students I read everything to them in literacy and I
modify their numbers in math. As well, I incorporate comprehension checks into each of my
lessons to beJer see if I need to re- state a concept prior to moving forward. While this is not
mandatory it is an important assessment tool that guides our lesson and quickly shows the
general class needs.
In literacy one way to know if students are ‘geLng it’ is by asking open ended ques:ons. By doing this
students can not guess their answer accurately but need to really cri:cally think about their material and
a connected response. As well I can tell when a student is having a harder :me with a topic because it
will take them longer to complete their wri:ng or reading test and they are easily geLng off task rather
than remaining mo:vated. In math I can tell when students are ‘geLng it’ because they are able to set
Dr. Debi Bochmann