OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: LEAH JANE C. MORILLO Name of Rater: DR. MAUEL I. LIPATA
Position: T-III/Teacher-In-Charge Position: OIC, CID Chief
Division: NORTHERN SAMAR Date of Review: July 2022
Rating Period: C.Y 2021
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
MFO’s KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Per
KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T Ave.
1. Supervised 5 teachers on Entire 35% (5)- 18-20 teachers supervised (5)- 95% - 100% accomplished (5)- All the time 5 5 4 4.67 0.47
instructional teaching School (4)- 14-17 teachers supervised supervisory documents (4)- Most of the time
implementation and delivery of Year (3)- 8-13 teachers supervised (4)- 90% - 94% accomplished documents (3)- Sometimes
10%
(2)- 4-7 teachers supervised (3)- 85% - 89% accomplished documents (2)- Rarely
K to 12 Curriculum on Distance
(1)- 1-3 teachers supervised (2)- 80% - 84% accomplished documents (1)- Not at all
Learning Modality
(1) 75% - 79% accomplished documents

2. Supervised 5 teachers on the Entire 5% (5)- 18-20 teachers supervised (5)- 95% - 100% accomplished (5)- All the time 5 5 4 4.67 0.23
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION

utilization of TG’s, CG’s and LM’s
in preparing the Daily Lesson
Plan.
MFO I- ACCESS
School (4)- 14-17 teachers supervised (4)- 90% - 94% accomplished (4)- Most of the time
Year (3)- 8-13 teachers supervised (3)- 85% - 89% accomplished (3)- Sometimes
(2)- 4-7 teachers supervised (2)- 80% - 84% accomplished (2)- Rarely
(1)- 1-3 teachers supervised (1) 75% - 79% accomplished (1)- Not at all

3. Maintained enrolment from Entire 5% (5)- 0% decreased enrolment (5)- 95% - 100% maintained enrolment Monitoring enrolment data 5 5 5 5 0.25
September 2021 to July 2022 School (4)- 1% decreased enrolment (4)- 90% - 94% maintained enrolment (5)- All the time
Year (3)- 2% decreased enrolment (3)- 85% - 89% maintained enrolment (4)- Most of the time
(2)- 3% decreased enrolment (2)- 80% - 84% maintained enrolment (3)- Sometimes
Ginagdanan ES has 223
(1)- 4% and above decrease of (1) 75% - 79% maintained enrolment (2)- Rarely
enrolment on September, 244 at enrolment (1)- Not at all
the end of school year. Ginagdanan ES has 0% decreased Ginagdanan ES -has 100% maintained
Enrolment enrolment
4. Maintained Promotion Rate Entire 5% (5)- 95% - 100% pupils promoted (5)- 95% - 100% pupils promoted (5)- All the time 5 5 5 5 0.25
by 100% School (4)- 90% - 94% pupils promoted (4)- 90% - 94% pupils promoted (4)- Most of the time
Year (3)- 85% - 89% pupils promoted (3)- 85% - 89% pupils promoted (3)- Sometimes
(2)- 80% - 84% pupils promoted (2)- 80% - 84% pupils promoted (1) 75% - (2)- Rarely
(1) 75% - 79% pupils promoted 79% pupils promoted (1)- Not at all

98% Promotion Rate 98% Promotion Rate

 Form 20  SF 5/ SF 6
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee: LEAH JANE C. MORILLO Name of Rater: DR. MAUEL I. LIPATA
Position: T-III/Teacher-In-Charge Position: OIC, CID Chief
Division: NORTHERN SAMAR Date of Review: July 2022
Rating Period: C.Y 2021
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
MFO’s KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Per
KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T Ave.
5. Achieved 0% Drop-out Rate Entire (5)- 0% drop-out rate (5)- 90% - 100% PARDO interventions Conduct of PARDO 5 5 5 5 0.25
School 5% (4)- 2% - 2.5% decreased in drop-out achieved Intervention
INSTRUCTIONAL

Year rate (4)- 80% - 89% PARDO interventions

SUPERVISION

GINADGANAN ES
(3)- 1.1% - 1.9% decreased in drop-out achieved (5)- All the time
S.Y 2019-2020 = 0%
rate (3)- 70% - 79% PARDO interventions (4)- Most of the time
S.Y 2020-2021 = 0% (2)- .6% - 1.0% decreased in drop-out achieved (3)- Sometimes
S.Y 2021-2022 = 0% rate (2)- 60% - 69% PARDO interventions (2)- Rarely
(1)- 0.1% - 0.5% decreased in drop-out achieved (1)- Not at all
MFO I- ACCESS

 Performance Indicator rate (1)- 59% and below PARDO

interventions achieved
1. Provided safe and conducive Entire (5)- All mechanisms for a safe and Classroom Management using the Monitoring School 5 5 5 5 0.25
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

learning and school
environment for learners
School conducive learning environment is CID Forms Environment
Year provided with reports and evidences.
5%
(4)- All mechanisms are provided but (5)- 90% - 100% Outstanding (5)- All the time
lacking for some minimal evidences. (4)- 80% - 89% Very Satisfactory (4)- Most of the time
(3)- All mechanisms are present but (3)- 70% - 79% Satisfactory (3)- Sometimes
without evidences. (2)- 60% - 69% Unsatisfactory (2)- Rarely
(2)- Incomplete mechanisms and (1)- 59% and below Poor (1)- Not at all
absence of reports.
(1)- Mechanisms are not provided

1.70
 1. Increased MPS for Quarterly Quarterly 40% (5)- 2% or more increment achieved (5)- 95% - 100% accomplished (5)- All the time 5 5 5 5 0.50
MFO II- QUALITY & Assessment by 2% (4)- 1.01% - 1.9% increment TOS/Test Questions and Item (4)- Most of the time
(3)- 0.5% - 1.0% increment Analysis monitored (3)- Sometimes

INSTRUCTIONAL
(2)- 0.1% - 0.4% increment (4)- 90% - 94% accomplished (2)- Rarely
RELEVANCE

LEADERSHIP
10% (1)- 0% increment (3)- 85% - 89% accomplished (1)- Not at all
(2)- 80% - 84% accomplished
(1) 75% - 79% accomplished
Consolidated MPS

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: LEAH JANE C. MORILLO Name of Rater: DR. MAUEL I. LIPATA
Position: T-III/Teacher-In-Charge Position: OIC, CID Chief
Division: NORTHERN SAMAR Date of Review: July 2022
Rating Period: C.Y 2021
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
MFO’s KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Per
KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T Ave.
2. Reduced frustration level in Entire (5)- 2% or more decrease of (5)- 90% - 100% Outstanding (5)- All the time 5 5 5 5 0.25
Reading by 2% from Pre-Test to School frustration level (4)- 80% - 89% Very Satisfactory (4)- Most of the time
Post Test Year (4)- 1.6% -1.9% decrease of (3)- 70% - 79% Satisfactory (3)- Sometimes
5%
frustration level (2)- 60% - 69% Unsatisfactory (2)- Rarely
(3)- 1% - 1.59 decrease of (1) 59% and below Poor (1)- Not at all
frustration level
(2)- 0.1%- 0.99% decrease of
frustration level
(1)- 0% decrease of frustration
level
1. Attended/required Training/ Entire 5% (5)- National training/seminar (5)- 6 or more training & seminars (5)- All the time 5 5 5 5 0.25
MFO II- QUALITY

HUMAN RESOURCE

Seminar/Workshop/ School attended attended (4)- Most of the time

Conferences Year (4)- Regional training/seminar (4)- 4 – 5 training & seminars attended (3)- Sometimes
attended (3)- 3 training & seminars attended (2)- Rarely
(3)- Division training/seminar (2)- 2 training & seminars attended (1)- Not at all
attended (1)- 1 training & seminar attended
(2)- District training/seminar
attended
(1)- School based
training/seminar attended
 2. Facilitated SLAC/ Entire 5% (5)- 6 SLAC/ conferences for (5)- 95% - 100% accomplished Targeted (5)- Done before the scheduled 4 4 4 4 0.20
Conferences for Teachers per School teachers facilitated per quarter SLAC time

MANAGEMENT AND
AND RELEVANCE
quarter for Clinical Supervision Year (4)- 5 SLAC/ conferences for (4)- 90% - 94% accomplished (4)- Done on the day of the

DEVELOPMEMT
teachers facilitated per quarter
(3)- 4 SLAC/ conferences for
teachers facilitated per quarter
(2)- 2-3 SLAC/ conferences for
teachers facilitated per quarter
(1)- 1 SLAC/ conferences for
teachers facilitated per quarter
(3)- 85% - 89% accomplished scheduled time
(2)- 80% - 84% accomplished (3)- Done a day after the
(1) 75% - 79% accomplished scheduled time
(2)- Done a week before the
scheduled time
(1)- Did not pursue activity on
the scheduled time

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: LEAH JANE C. MORILLO Name of Rater: DR. MAUEL I. LIPATA
Position: T-III/Teacher-In-Charge Position: OIC, CID Chief
Division: NORTHERN SAMAR Date of Review: July 2022
Rating Period: C.Y 2021
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
MFO’s KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Per
KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T Ave.
1. Produced E-SIP & AIP through Entire (5)- All SPT members are involved (5)- 100% all parts of E-SIP/AIP (5)- Accomplished before the 5 4 4 4.3 0.43
Strategic Planning by all the School (4)- 6-7 members are involved accomplished appropriately target date/deadline
DATA BASED STRATEGIC

members of the Planning Team Year (3)- 4-5 members are involved
10%
(2)- 2-3 members are involved
(1)- 1 member is involved
PLANNING
(4)- 90% - 99% accomplished (4)- Accomplished on the target
(3)- 80% - 89% accomplished date or on the deadline
(2)- 70% - 79% accomplished documents (3)- Accomplished after the

(1) 69% and below accomplished target date of deadline

(2)- Accomplished weeks after
the target date/deadline
(1)- Accomplished months after
the target date/deadline
 2. Provided TA in all the school Entire 5% (5)- 18-20 teachers provided TA (5)- 95% - 100% accomplished TA target (5)- Done before the scheduled 5 5 4 4.67 0.23
programs and activities. School (4)- 14-17 teachers provided TA (4)- 90% - 94% accomplished TA target time

PROVISION OF TECHNICAL
II- QUALITY AND
* Quarterly SMEA preparation Year (3)- 8-13 teachers provided TA (3)- 85% - 89% accomplished TA target (4)- Done on the day of the
(2)- 4-7 teachers provided TA (2)- 80% - 84% accomplished TA target scheduled time
*Quarterly Portfolio Day
ASSISTANCE
MFO RELEVANCE

(1)- 1-3 teachers provided TA (1) 75% - 79% accomplished TA target (3)- Done a day after the
*Health and Nutrition
scheduled time
* Other DepEd Programs and (2)- Done a week before the
Activities scheduled time
(1)- Did not pursue activity on
the scheduled time

1.86
1. Involve Stakeholders in the Entire 20% (5)- 90% - 100% participation in (5)- 4 or more stakeholders initiated Participation of stakeholders in 5 5 4 4.67 0.47
PARENTS INVOLVEMENT AND

implementation of school School all school activities activity accomplished all school activities
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
GOVERNANCE

programs and projects Year (4)- 80% - 89% participation in all (4)- 4 or more stakeholders initiated (5)- All the time
10%
school activities activity accomplished (4)- Most of the time
MFO III

(3)- 70% - 79% participation in all
school activities
(2)- 60% - 69% participation in all
school activities
(1)- 59% and below participation
in all school activities
(3)- 4 or more stakeholders initiated (3)- Sometimes
activity accomplished (2)- Rarely
(2)- 4 or more stakeholders initiated (1)- Not at all
activity accomplished
(1) 4 or more stakeholders initiated
activity accomplished

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: LEAH JANE C. MORILLO Name of Rater: DR. MAUEL I. LIPATA
Position: T-III/Teacher-In-Charge Position: OIC, CID Chief
Division: NORTHERN SAMAR Date of Review: July 2022
Rating Period: C.Y 2021
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
MFO’s KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Per
KRA Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T Ave.
 1. Utilized and optimized Entire (5)- 95% -100% of MOOE received (5)- 95% - 100% of MOOE utilized & (5)- Accomplished before the 5 5 5 5 0.50
MFO III- GOVERNANCE

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
downloading of MOOE School (4)- 90% -94% of MOOE received liquidated target date/deadline
Year (3)- 85% -89% of MOOE received (4)- 90% - 94% of MOOE utilized & (4)- Accomplished on the target
10%
(2)- 80% -84% of MOOE received liquidated date or on the deadline
(1)- 75% -79% of MOOE received (3)- 85% - 89% of MOOE utilized & (3)- Accomplished after the
liquidated target date of deadline
(2)- 80% - 84% of MOOE utilized & (2)- Accomplished weeks after
liquidated the target date/deadline
(1) 75% - 79% of MOOE utilized & (1)- Accomplished months after
liquidated the target date/deadline

0.97
PARTIAL RATING OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS 4.46
FACTORS
MFO IV-
PLUS

OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 4.53

Descriptive Rating Outstanding