GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR KERJA -

KERJA KECEMASAN MEMBAIKPULIH

RUNTUHAN CERUN PADA MENARA T5
KENYIR HYDROELECTRIC POWER STATION,
TERENGGANU DARUL IMAN

Technical Proposal

Prepared for:
 Geotechnica Sdn Bhd (1378487-P)
48-1, Jalan Aman Sinaria 4
Bandar Tropicana Aman
42500 Telok Panglima Garang
Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Our ref.: TCP.GM.SZY.22-62 Tel : +6 03 8683 6682
Website : www.geotechnica.com.my

4th November 2022

SZY Consultants Sdn. Bhd.

A-39, Tingkat 1, Jalan IM 3/11,
Bandar Indera Mahkota,
25200 Kuantan,
Pahang Darul Makmur
Tel: +6 09-573 2003

Attn: Ms. Faridah Hanom

Dear Ms.,
GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR KERJA - KERJA KECEMASAN MEMBAIKPULIH RUNTUHAN CERUN
PADA MENARA T5 TALIAN 274KV KNYR-HTRG/KNYR-KDIS JABATAN GRID MAINTENANCE,
BAHAGIAN GRID, TNB
Sub: Technical and Commercial Proposal

With reference to the above, we would like to thank you for giving us the opportunity and inviting
us to submit a proposal for the above-mentioned project. In this connection, Geotechnica Sdn.
Bhd. is pleased to present herewith our proposed professional fee for your consideration and
approval.

We hope that our proposal is in order and acceptable to your expectation. It is our commitment
in providing consistently high-quality services and a good value to you. We look forward to
receiving your favourable response/acceptance. Please do not hesitate to contact us should you
require further information or clarification.

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,
GEOTECHNICA SDN. BHD.

……………………………………….
P.Geol. Gs. Hairil Azwan b Razak (M.I.G.M, MIGRSM)
Managing Director
 TABLE OF CONTENT

1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2

1.1 GENERAL .................................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................................. 2
1.3 WHY GEOTECHNICA SDN. BHD.? ....................................................................................... 3
2.0 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................................. 4
2.1 GENERAL .................................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................... 4
2.3 GENERAL GEOLOGY .............................................................................................................. 9
3.0 SCOPE OF WORKS .................................................................................................................... 11
3.1 TERM OF REFERENCE .......................................................................................................... 11
3.2 DESKTOP STUDY ................................................................................................................... 11
3.3 AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY MAPPING USING UAV................................................ 11
3.4 LIDAR ACQUISITION............................................................................................................. 13
3.5 TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING (TLS) ......................................................................... 17
3.6 FIELD DATA COLLECTION AND MAPPING ................................................................... 19
3.7 STABILITY ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................... 24
3.8 MITIGATION CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ............................................................................... 26
4.0 EXECUTION PLAN ..................................................................................................................... 28
4.1 GENERAL .................................................................................................................................. 28
4.2 KEY RESOURCES ................................................................................................................... 28
4.3 WORK DURATION.................................................................................................................. 29
5.0 DELIVERABLES .......................................................................................................................... 29
5.1 MATERIALS TO BE SUPPLIED BY CLIENT ..................................................................... 29
6.0 COMMERCIAL PROPOSAL .................................................................................................... 30
6.1 FEE EXCLUSION ..................................................................................................................... 31

Page 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 General

Landslide tragedy is often resulted in casualties and loss of lives and extensive damage to
properties mainly in hilly and mountainous areas. In the monsoon-dominated and tropical
regions, landslides often occur in areas characterized by steep hillslopes, high rainfall
intensities, seasonally dry periods, unstable slopes and under forests. With these set of
climates combined with the inherent geological conditions, landslides often cause extensive
damage to infrastructure and many casualties.

As slopes behave differently to one another, therefore, it is necessary to determine and

highlight slopes in hazardous and high risk area. A comprehensive study is necessary to assess
the safety of slopes and identify mitigation measures. In order to reduce the vulnerability of
these hazards, it is important to identify the probability of the slope to fail and prioritize them
accordingly throughout slope hazard and risk assessment. Rocks in tropical country are well
exposed to extensive physical and chemical weathering due to its humid and hot climate. This
may result in wear and tear of rocks as well as slope failures.

The following proposal has been prepared in response to the Request for Proposal from SZY
Consultants Sdn Bhd (hereinafter referred to as “Client”) to Geotechnica Sdn Bhd (hereinafter
referred to as “GTSB”). Client has requested GTSB to submit technical and commercial
proposal for GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR KERJA - KERJA KECEMASAN MEMBAIKPULIH
RUNTUHAN CERUN PADA MENARA T5 TALIAN 274KV KNYR-HTRG/KNYR-KDIS JABATAN
GRID MAINTENANCE IN THE VICINITY OF KENYIR HYDROELECTRIC POWER STATION,
TERENGGANU DARUL IMAN. The objective of this proposal is to outline detailed description
of services in technical and commercial on the proposed scope of services. This proposal will
briefly describe on the scope of work, resources, cost estimation and project schedule.

1.2 Objective

The objective for this study are as follow:

i. To perform survey of slope surface using Aerial Photogrammetry and/or LiDAR.
ii. To conduct Site Investigation which consist of MPs and Hand Auger with lab testing.
iii. To conduct Geophysical Seismic survey at the identified location.
iv. To conduct Geophysical Resistivity Tomography survey at the identified location.
v. To identify hazard condition and establish data inventory of the slopes within the
vicinity of the proposed study area of slope features for this landslide prone area and
subsequently come out with landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk map.

Page 2
1.3 Why Geotechnica Sdn. Bhd.?

Geotechnica Sdn. Bhd. (GTSB) was established to provide professional engineering geological
consultancy and project management services to a full spectrum of private and public sector
organizations. GTSB not only specialized in conventional geological mapping, geotechnical
design and engineering analyses, but GTSB niche area are in the Geohazards and Risk
Assessment (semi-quantitative or full QRA) and Geoforensic study. GTSB is the best candidate
to carry out the proposed study as its personnel have numerous years of relevant experiences
in slope study and research. Subsequently, GTSB has provided services for few Clients such as
PETRONAS Carigali sdn. Bhd., Technovita Sdn Bhd, JMG, Prolintas, SILK Highway, EGEO
Connsultant Sdn Bhd, GoGEO Engineering etc. Some of the key projects are:

i. Geohazard and Risk Assessment using LiDAR along 512km of Sabah Sarawak Gas
Pipeline (SSGP) ROW for PETRONAS Carigali Sdn Bhd.
ii. Slope Hazard and Risk Assessment along Jalan Raya Negeri Sarawak for JKR Sarawak.
iii. Rock Slope Hazard and Risk Assessment along Kajang SILK Highway for Prolintas Group
of Company.
iv. Slope Hazard and Risk Assessment at Pusat Dakwah Ummah development, Kg Baru
Pulau Redang for JKR Terengganu.
v. Specialized study on overall risk assessment (QRA) of Sabah-Sarawak Gas Pipeline for
PETRONAS Carigali Sdn Bhd.
vi. Detail Geological Assessment at KP220 Pipeline Ruptured for PETRONAS Carigali Sdn
Bhd.
vii. Geoforensic Study at KP139, Lawas for Sabah-Sarawak Gas Pipeline, PETRONAS
Carigali Sdn Bhd.
viii. Geohazard and Geotechnical Assessment at KP2 of TULIP Pipeline ROW, for
PETRONAS Gas Berhad.
ix. Geohazard Assessment of Slope Failure at Ringlet, Cameron Highlands for
Minconsult/TNB.
x. Slope inspection andSlope inspection and assessment for 20 nos of critical slope under
JMG Selangor
xi. Slope inspection and assessment for 20 nos of critical slopes under JMG N. Sembilan

Page 3
2.0 STUDY AREA
2.1 General

The area of interest (AOI) is located along the TNB Kenyir Hydroelectric Power station on the
right abutment as the concern area. The Kenyir Hydropower Scheme is located on the
Terengganu River, approximately 40 km south-west of Kuala Terengganu in the north-east of
Peninsular Malaysia. The scheme is a multi-purpose project for hydropower generation and
flood mitigation. In addition, the scheme prevents the salinity intrusion of seawater in areas
near the river mouth during the dry season. The main features of the scheme include Kenyir
Dam, a 155 m high earth core rockfill dam on the Terengganu River and eight associated
earthfill saddle dams located at low points on a ridge forming the north-eastern boundary of
the reservoir. The appurtenant structures include an ungated spillway with chute on the right
abutment, pressure tunnels with inlet structure and a surface powerhouse at the toe of the
dam with four generating units of each 100 MW installed capacity. The power station supplies
power to the interconnected 275 kV transmission system covering the whole of Peninsular
Malaysia. The area of interest (AOI) covered approximately 5.5 acres.

2.2 Background

A series of slope failure incident within the vicinity of TNB Kenyir Hydroelectric Power Station
(Station) have been reported on 2th February 2022. Preliminary site inspection conducted by
TNB Engineering team on 28th February to 2nd March 2022 has discovered at least seven (7)
localized slope failures in the vicinity of Kenyir Power Station. All five (5) slope failures (i.e.
named as Slope 1, Slope 2, Slope 3, Slope 4 and Slope 5) are located along the left abutment
while another two (2) slope failures are located on the right abutment (i.e. named as Slope 6
and Slope 7). The location of the AOI are shown in Figure 2.1 to 2.5.

Page 4
 Table 2.1: Location of the study area (source: Google Earth)

Figure 2.2: Detailed location of the study area (source: Google Earth).

Page 5
Figure 2.3: Overview of site area based on 3D model generated from topo-survey provided.

Figure 2.4: Overview of site area.

Page 6
 Figure 2.5: Overview of site area (source: SZY Consultant).

A desktop assessment has been carried out which was found out that the area is potentially
vulnerable to geological hazard threats such as landslide of various scales and types. This
phenomenon gives risk to loss of life, public comfortless /safety, damage to property and also
potentially impact on government finances especially when it involves public property. Based
on previous cases of hazards event, it was found that the spatial information of geological
hazard, terrain and slope are one of the important factors that contribute to a slope failure.
Figure 2.6 to 2.9 show the spatial layer generated from IFSAR satellite imageries.

Figure 2.6: 3D terrain model based on IFSAR generated for the Kenyir Dam area.

Page 7
 Figure 2.7: 3D topography contour based on IFSAR generated for the Kenyir Dam area.

Figure 2.8: Overview of the slope gradient based on IFSAR generated for the Kenyir Dam area.

Page 8
 Figure 2.9: 3D hillshade based on IFSAR generated for the Kenyir Dam area.

2.3 General Geology

On a regional scale, the catchment area is underlain by felsic igneous rock mainly of granite
and granodiorite, marine clastics (shale and sandstone), minor carbonates with some
metamorphics (phyllite, quartzite) and basic to intermediate volcanics. The eastern part of the
Kenyir Lake (including the project site), however is underlain by granitic rocks of the Kapal
batholith. The batholith is a composite body ranging from diorite to monzogranite in
composition and is dominated by granodiorite. The granites in both areas have been intruded
by dykes of mafic to intermediate composition with average thickness ranging from 10 cm to
50 meters. The thicker dykes commonly show chilled margins and a regular inward increase
of grain size. They are almost planar and near vertical, but some may have dip as low as 45°.
On further east side towards downstream of Terengganu River, continental quaternary
deposits are more common which consisting of clay, silt, sand with minor gravel occurrence.

Page 9
Figure 2.10: Regional geological map of the site (JMG 2014)

Page 10
3.0 SCOPE OF WORKS
3.1 Term of Reference

The proposed Terms of Reference for the study are as follows:

i. To carry out literature review and desk study.

ii. To perform data acquisition, using the following options:
a) Aerial Photogrammetry using UAV drone.
b) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) using UAV drone.
c) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) using Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS).
iii. To carry out field data collection and geological rock discontinuity mapping.
iv. To carry out rock kinematic analysis to determine potential mode of failure and
trajectory analysis.
v. To carry out slope stability analysis to determine the factor of safety (FOS).
vi. To prepare Geological Assessment report and maps based on field and desktop
assessment with recommendation for mitigation.

3.2 Desktop Study

Desktop assessment is one of the essential items to provide overview and understanding of
the site background such as lithology, bedrock profile as well as to identify area of weak zones
are present within the study area. For this study, desktop assessment includes:

i. Review and analysis all geological and geotechnical reports, maps and cross sections,
and surveys related to the study area.
ii. Review of topographic map, contour map, and digital elevation map.
iii. Review on Soil Investigation Reports to understand the geomaterials properties and
hydrogeological parameter.
iv. Review and interpret historical landslide or slope failure records of the project area.

3.3 Aerial Photogrammetry Mapping using UAV

Aerial photogrammetry (AP) is the science of deducing the physical dimensions of objects on
or above the surface of the Earth from measurements on aerial photographs of the objects.
For this project, aerial photogrammetry will be carried out using the DJI Phantom 4 Pro. The
acquisition of 3D information through photogrammetric techniques has long been applied by
geoscientists; most notably owing to their capability to visualize the Earth’s surface and
extract topographic data from stereo aerial photographs (Birdseye, 1940). During the photos
acquisition, overlapping photographs was taken from different positions allow each feature
in the overlapping area defined by a unique 3D position. Following this, dense cloud was
produced and the mesh and orthophoto (ortho-rectified photograph) will be retrieved for
further analysis.

Page 11
An orthophoto, orthophotograph or orthoimage is an aerial photograph geometrically
corrected (“orthorectified”) such that the scale is uniform where the photo has the same lack
of distortion as a map. Unlike an uncorrected aerial photograph, an orthophotograph can be
used to measure true distances, because it is an accurate representation of the Earth’s
surface, having been adjusted for topographic relief, lens distortion, and camera tilt. An
orthophotomosaic is a raster image made by merging orthophotos - aerial or satellite
photographs which have been transformed to correct for perspective so that they appear to
have been taken from vertically above at an infinite distance. However, the limitation of AP is
it is unable to penetrated trees and canopy. Thus, DTM generated from AP is not accurate. AP
is suitable to be used for overall slope modelling.

Figure 3.1: The schematic shows (a) perspective views project from the surface onto the
datum plane from a fixed location, and (b) the orthographic views or true orthophoto
project at a right angle to the datum.

Page 12
 Figure 3.2: DJI Phantom 4 Pro to be used for aerial photogrammetry acquisition.

3.4 LiDAR Acquisition

Unlike AP, a LiDAR collection system uses a powerful laser sensor comprised of a transmitter
and a receiver, a geodetic-quality Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, and an Inertial
Navigation System (INS) unit. As it is using light/laser pulse as measurement tools, it is able to
penetrate trees and canopy in general. The technology resembles that used by radar sensors
by which a device emits energy (focused light) and then measures the time it takes to travel
to a target and return to a collector and at the same time compensates for the movement of
the aircraft and the sensor. The laser sensor is precision-mounted to the underside of an
aircraft (helicopter or airplane) similar to the mounting of a precision aerial mapping camera.

Figure 3.3: Concept of LiDAR acquisition process

Page 13
Laser pulses emitted from a LiDAR system reflect from objects both on and above the ground
surface, vegetation, buildings, bridges, and so on. One emitted laser pulse can return to the
LiDAR sensor as one or many returns. Any emitted laser pulse that encounters multiple
reflection surfaces as it travels toward the ground is split into as many returns as there are
reflective surfaces. The first returned laser pulse is the most significant return and will be
associated with the highest feature in the landscape like a treetop or the top of a building.
The first return can also represent the ground, in which case only one return will be detected
by the LiDAR system. Multiple returns are capable of detecting the elevations of several
objects within the laser footprint of an outgoing laser pulse. The intermediate returns, in
general, are used for vegetation structure, and the last return for bare-earth terrain models.
The last return will not always be from a ground return. For example, consider a case where
a pulse hits a thick branch on its way to the ground and the pulse does not actually reach the
ground. In this case, the last return is not from the ground but from the branch that reflected
the entire laser pulse. For this project, there will be at least 4 returns as specified.

Figure 3.4: Concept of LiDAR laser return

Figure 3.5: Example of basic GIS output

Page 14
 Figure 3.6: Example of GIS data generated using LiDAR for previous project.

For this study, the technique proposed for elevation data acquisition will be the airbone LiDAR
(Light Detection and Ranging) method using stable drone DJI Matrice 30 RTK to generate the
following:

i. Orthomosaic / Ortho-rectified photograph

ii. DEM and DTM for bare earth with accuracy (x,y) 0.2m - 0.5m depending on
topography/terrain.
iii. Contour interval up to 1 m
iv. Layers of Slope Angle, Hillshade, TIN and Slope Aspect
v. GIS features extraction i.e., Roads, buildings, major drainage system (i.e., main
drain, monsoon drain etc) and landcover etc.
vi. 3D Fly Through video, and etc.

Page 15
Figure 3.7: DJI Matrice 300 RTK drones will be used for LiDAR acquisition

Figure 3.8: UAV specification to be used for this study

Page 16
3.5 Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS)

The different between Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) and LiDAR using UAV is the data
accuracy and its point cloud classification. Using TLS, a more detail terrain model can be
generated as the point cloud generated is more denser compare to the UAV drone, and able
to eliminate trees and canopy as it is placed static on the ground. However, in term of area
coverage and view, it is limited compared to UAV drone LiDAR.

TLS is one of the examples of remote sensing that has been used in slope monitoring and
analysis of rock face structure (Dunning et al. 2009; Sturzenegger & Stead 2009). TLS is used
to measure features of inaccessible rock boulder, study on the geomorphological evolution of
the rock face and frequency of rockfall and also to detect displacement of millimetric
magnitude prior to failure. The advantage of TLS is it able to get an accurate measurement at
large area, can determine the type of rock at a distance and visualize subject in 3 dimensional.
The prior research is focused on the analysis of the discontinuity in the rock by using a
compass and compared with the TLS data. TLS provides denser, rapid and safe rock mass
discontinuity measurements. Discontinuity properties such as dip angle and dip direction of
the joints which may be unreachable by scanline technique can be quickly scanned and
extracted from the 3D Digital Terrain Model (DTM) created by 3D TLS. These data can be
processed for rock slope stability analysis input.

Figure 3.9: Concept and example of TLS survey equipment.

Page 17
Figure 3.10: Example of TLS point cloud processed data to determine discontinuity
dataset.

Page 18
3.6 Field Data Collection and Mapping

a) Geological Mapping
Field mapping works will be carried out by trained and qualified geologists. In order to
establish a refined data collection, field mapping will be subdivided to cover the aspects
of survey for slope, structural and geological mapping. The three (3) aspects are required
to be mapped individually in the field and future used as part of key parameters to classify
the hazard and risk factors. The three (3) field proformas required namely are:
i. Primary Slope Proforma; is the key proforma which require to be filled up upon the
survey / mapping of man-made slope
ii. Slope Structure Proforma; only require to be filled if any distress observed such as
bulging, settlement, tilting, movement and/or crack on the retaining wall or building
during mapping of slope.
iii. Geology and Rock Proforma; only require to be filled if rock slope or major rock
outcrop observed.

The proforma/s are used to identify and record the elements or parameters which
required in order to carry out the hazard and risk analysis of the slopes. In general, the
important parameters are:
i. Slope geometry
ii. Slope location in relation to structures / development.
iii. Type of distress found on the slope and its location (e.g. tension cracks on slopes and
building depression or movements or road or structures on slope)
iv. Evaluate the defects identify and the consequences of the defects to other structure
and overall safety.
v. Inadequacy of post construction works or design performed, by evaluating the distress
and defects found at structures on slopes.
vi. Evaluate the preliminary indication of potential risk and hazard
vii. Identity potential mode of failures and the consequences of failure.

Figure 3.11: Example of rock slope mapping.

Page 19
b) Kinematic Analysis
When dealing with rock slopes, the failure mode is different compared to a soil slope
whereby it is the instability mechanism is structurally controlled, which means that block
formed by any set of discontinuities may be free to either fall or slide. The slope stability
assessment is crucial to highlight any potential danger and mode of rock slope failure that
might be imposed by the existing slopes/rock trenches. Hence, graphical method or
kinematics slope stability of discontinuity is the most suitable method to (Hoek & Bray,
1981). For this study, drone mapping will be combine with conventional mapping to
produce the discontinuity sets.

Figure 3.12: Example of discontinuity data extraction using aerial photogrammetry

In general, hard rock such as granite or diorite in this area, the potential mode of failure
can either be one or combination of the following modes of failure (Figure 3.3):
i. Circular failure – this type of failure generally occurs on very heavily fractured
rock mass, where no identifiable pattern of structures.
ii. Planar Failure – failure will take place on dominant discontinuity or highly
ordered structure, parallel or near parallel to the slope face.
iii. Wedge Failure – commonly occurred on two or more intersecting discontinuity
planes.
iv. Toppling – failure in hard rock which can form columnar or blocky structures
separated by steeply dipping discontinuities.

Page 20
 Figure 3.13: Illustration of rock mass features to be mapped.

By assuming the worst-case instability scenario, i.e. when the critical and daylighting plane
of weakness is dissecting down to the toe of the slope/trench; the required length and
angle of rock bolts to support the potential wedges/blocks can be calculated and
estimated directly from the cross sections.

Figure 3.14: Example of kinematic failure analysis performed for previous project

Page 21
Figure 3.15: Example of kinematic failure analysis vs field verification for previous project.

Figure 3.16: Example of structure delineation on front elevation view.

Page 22
 Figure 3.17: Example of structure delineation on front elevation view.

c) Runout Distance Analysis

One of the ways to calculate vulnerability or consequence is by measuring or estimate

runout distance of a failure towards the elements at risk. For this study, runout distance
of potential slope failure to road, structure or facility were selected to be part of
consequence parameter. The runout distance determines the degree of damage impact
by any slope failure events. The closer the distance between them, the higher the damage
impact if landslide or slope failure occurs.

Page 23
 Methods for predicting landslide run out in this study was based on geomorphological-
based and geometrical approaches. Field work and LiDAR image interpretation are the
main sources of the geomorphological analysis for determining the run out distance of
landslides (Hungr, et al., 2005). The assessment of both past and future landslide deposits
is the basis for defining future run out distances. For area concerning with rock fall from
boulders or disintegrate rock blocks, rockfall trajectory will be carried out using Rockfall™
software’s by Rocscience as well as Trajec3D by BasRock. Rocfall is a statistical analysis
program designed to assist with a risk assessment of slopes at risk of rock falls.

Figure 3.18: Example of 2D rockfall trajectory analysis used for previous project.

Figure 3.19: Example of 3D rockfall trajectory analysis used for previous project.

3.7 Stability Analysis

Slope stability analysis is vital to be performed to establish the required/safe slope at the site
area. Through slope stability analysis, Factor of Safety (FOS) of particular slope will be able to
be determined and cross reference with JKR requirement (refer table below).

Page 24
Slope stability will be carried out using computer software and as for this assessment, GTSB
will perform slope calculation using slope/w or SLOPE software with profile setup shown in
Figure 3.25.

Figure 3.20: Example of stability analysis to determine safety factor of slope.

If dealing with rock slopes, once a kinematic analysis of rock stability using stereographic
methods has been performed indicating the possibility of either planar, wedge or topple
failure, a more detailed stability analyses will be carried out to determine the likelihood of
failure via factor of safety (FOS). The common analytical technique is a rigid-block analysis in
which failure is assumed to be by linear sliding along the line of intersection formed by the
discontinuities or by sliding along one of the discontinuities. The stability of the rock slope can
be evaluated using the factor of safety concept by resolving the forces acting normal to the
discontinuities and in the direction parallel to the line of intersection. These forces include the
weight of the block, external forces such as foundation loads, seismic accelerations, tensioned

Page 25
 reinforcing elements, forces generated by water pressures acting on the surfaces, and the
shear strength developed along the sliding plane or planes.

Figure 3.21: Example of planar failure analysis using Rocplane.

3.8 Mitigation Conceptual Design

Based on the findings of the study, recommendations on the preventive/remedial measures

will be provided. The recommendations shall be in the form of conceptual recommendations
with estimated cost. The recommendations shall be sufficient for the local authorities to take
further action.

In general, remediation selection of a slope depending on several aspect and criteria, such as:

i. Time/Purpose of remediation (temporary, short term, long term)

ii. Type of slope (cut slope, fill/embankment slope, longitudinal slope)
iii. Geologic material of slope (rock slope, soil slope, weathering grade)
iv. Type of failure (surficial failure, shallow/deep seated failure, structurally
controlled of rock slope failure)
v. Accessibility
vi. Cost, and many more.

Page 26
Figure 3.22: Illustration of typical method of slope stabilization and protection measures.

Page 27
 Figure 3.23: Example of proposed mitigation conceptual design.

4.0 EXECUTION PLAN

4.1 General

Below are the planned activities to deliver the services:

No. Activity Parties Location

1 Proposal by Consultant Consultant Consultant office
2 Kick off / Pre-Job meeting Consultant, Client Client office/online
3 Desktop/Field Assessment and analysis Consultant Site Location
Consultant office
4 Preparation of report and issuance of Consultant Consultant office
draft and final documentation/report
5 Final presentation (if necessary) Consultant, Client Consultant / Client
office/ online

4.2 Key Resources

The proposed key personnel for this study are as tabulated below.

No. Personnel Designation

1 P.Geol Gs. Hairil Azwan Razak Principal, Geohazards
2 P.Geol. Gs. Che ku Waqiyuddin Senior Eng Geologist
3 Ir. Nor Ibrahim Berhonuddin Senior Geotechnical Engineer
4 Ahmad Kamil Ahmad Nadzri Senior Geologist
5 Gs. Nurul Najihah Shahri Senior Geospatialist
6 M Izzul Syahmi Site Geologist
7 M Shazali Site Geologist
8 Natra Ameera Site Geologist

Page 28
 4.3 Work Duration

The proposed overall duration for this study is approximately six (6) weeks as tabulated below.

No. Activity Duration

1 Survey data acquisition
1,2
2 days
Survey data processing 1 week
2 2
Field mapping 1 week
Data processing & analysis 1 week
3 Data analysis (geological, geospatial and slope stability) 2 weeks
4 Prepare report and issuance of draft / final 1 week
documentation/report with professional endorsement
Note: 1 Type of survey subject to requirement and agreement with Client either AP, LiDAR or TLS.
2
The task will be performed concurrently.

The proposed duration above is exclusive of mobilization/demobilization and are not taking into
consideration standby due to Covid-19 SOP, bad weather and etc.

5.0 DELIVERABLES

Upon completion of the slope rehabilitation works, the following deliverables will be submitted:

i. Survey data (either Aerial Photogrammetry, LiDAR UAV or TLS data) which consist of Digital
Elevation Model (DTM, DSM), orthophoto, Contour, any cross section specified by Client and
3D fly through / video footage of the site.
ii. Geological Assessment report, maps and drawings inclusive of spatial analysis with
professional endorsement.

5.1 Materials to be Supplied by Client

The Client shall supply all existing information required to complete all tasks in this project, not limited
to the following:

i. Any site investigation report (borehole data, mackintosh probe, etc.).

ii. Topographic data from licensed surveyor (contour or digital terrain map) in digital
format.
iii. Any other relevant data available.

Page 29
 6.0 COMMERCIAL PROPOSAL

The estimated cost for the scope of work is as per below breakdown:

Rate Amount
Item Description Unit Qty (RM) (RM)
1.0 General and Preliminaries LS 5,000.00
1.1 Mobilization & demobilization

2.0 a) Data Acquisition using UAV Aerial Photogrammetry LS 5,000.00

2.1 Establish Ground Control Points (GCP)
2.2 Data acquisition
2.3 Data processing and analysis e.g. DTM, Contour, Hillshade etc.

b) Data Acquisition using UAV Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) LS 25,000.00
2.1 Establish Ground Control Points (GCP)
2.2 Data acquisition
2.3 Data processing and analysis e.g. DTM, Contour, Hillshade etc.

c) Data Acquisition using LiDAR TLS LS 35,000.00

2.1 Establish Ground Control Points (GCP)
2.2 Data acquisition
2.3 Data processing and analysis e.g. DTM, Contour, Hillshade etc.

3.0 Field Mapping Data Collection and Analysis LS 35,000.00

3.1 Geological field assessment and data collection
3.2 Stereonet plot and kinematic analysis
3.3 Trajectory analysis
3.4 Mitigation concept
3.5 Geological Assessment report with endorsement

4.0 Slope Stability Analysis LS 15,000.00

4.1 Slope stability analysis using slope/w
4.2 Rock slope stability analysis using Rocscience
4.3 Geotechnical Slope Stability report with endorsement

5.0 Miscellaneous e.g. medical checkup, NTSP/OGSP course, meeting, LS 5,000.00

presentation to client.

Remarks:

1. The above-quoted price is valid within one (1) month from the date of this proposal as
noted on the cover letter.
2. Item 2.0 is optional of (a), (b) or (c), subject to preference by the Client (either the data
is required for geological mapping & analysis purposes, or as part of scope required by
Client).

Page 30
 3. Client agrees that any extension/additional of work or manhours required by Client or
delay incurred due to Client actions and/or decisions during this project shall be
charged separately, based on extra man-hours and any incidental expenses spent/
incurred. These charges are excluded from the above lump sum contract price.
4. Payment milestone shall be 20% upon appointment, 20% upon completion of
fieldworks, 50% upon submission of the final report and the remaining upon acceptance
of the final report.
5. Payment terms between GTSB and Client shall be within 30 days after invoice
submission.

6.1 Fee Exclusion

The proposed professional fee does not include the following:

i. Government and service tax (SST).

ii. Any fee, processing fee or contribution to any authority.
iii. Traffic management plan.
iv. Security/Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).
v. Insurance of work, public liability insurance & workmen compensation insurance.

- End of proposal -

Page 31