Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4.3 Giving Feedback On Written Work
4.3 Giving Feedback On Written Work
Sitio: Aula Virtual de Formación del Profesorado. Junta de Andalucía. Imprimido por: Moreno Liso, Carmen
Curso: 371. SOFT SKILLS IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE CLASSROOM - ÚNICO Día: domingo, 12 de diciembre de 2021, 11:53
Libro: 4.3 Giving feedback on written work
https://educacionadistancia.juntadeandalucia.es/profesorado/mod/book/tool/print/index.php?id=434327 1/8
12/12/21 11:53 4.3 Giving feedback on written work
Tabla de contenidos
1. Presentation
https://educacionadistancia.juntadeandalucia.es/profesorado/mod/book/tool/print/index.php?id=434327 2/8
12/12/21 11:53 4.3 Giving feedback on written work
1. Presentation
The following presentation talks about the different factors that are involved in responding to students' written work.
On the next pages you can see examples of the aspects discussed in the genial.ly presentation.
RESPONDING
By Sally Bolton
TO WRITING
https://educacionadistancia.juntadeandalucia.es/profesorado/mod/book/tool/print/index.php?id=434327 3/8
12/12/21 11:53 4.3 Giving feedback on written work
There are many different ways of responding to students’ writing. Think about the following factors:
Source
of feedback Teacher
Peers
Self
Written
Both
Small group
Individual
·
narrow focus
·
focus on several aspects
·
global focus
Process
·
narrow focus
·
focus on several aspects
·
global focus
Writing scale
Checklist
Portfolio of writing
https://educacionadistancia.juntadeandalucia.es/profesorado/mod/book/tool/print/index.php?id=434327 4/8
12/12/21 11:53 4.3 Giving feedback on written work
Source – teacher
Mode – spoken
Form – comments
After students have all completed a writing task, you can provide whole class feedback about the good points and the points that need work
on. This may focus on aspects such as content
knowledge (did they display knowledge of all the content areas), task completion (did they
answer the question), organisation (how well did they use paragraphs, headings, etc.) and general
points about language use (did they use a
range of interesting language and structures). The benefit of whole class feedback is that everyone can see what the teacher is looking for
and
where common mistakes occur.
You can record this feedback and send it to the students in an audio or video file, or you can give it in the class.
It is often beneficial to follow this feedback with individual self or peer feedback on the writing. The learners could then re-draft their texts, taking into account the teacher’s whole class
feedback and their individual self or peer feedback.
https://educacionadistancia.juntadeandalucia.es/profesorado/mod/book/tool/print/index.php?id=434327 5/8
12/12/21 11:53 4.3 Giving feedback on written work
Source
– teacher
Mode
– written
Size
– individual
Focus
– important aspects
Form
– scale (comments optional)
Amount
– single piece
This
form of feedback can focus on the aspects that the teacher thinks are most
important. It provides a quick and easy way of marking work which provides
direction for the student to
improve particular aspects.
Here
is an example of a scale:
Writing
aspect Comment
Task
fulfilment
1 2
3 4
Organisation
and structure
1 2
3 4
Mechanics
(spelling, punctuation)
1 2
3 4
Content
1 2
3 4
Richness of
vocabulary
1 2
3 4
Language
control
1 2
3 4
You
can use pre-prepared scales (for example the Trinity ISE writing scales for each level) and/or choose to add
aspects that are relevant
to your students.
Using
scales reduces the workload for the teacher and directs students towards
self-correction.
https://educacionadistancia.juntadeandalucia.es/profesorado/mod/book/tool/print/index.php?id=434327 6/8
12/12/21 11:53 4.3 Giving feedback on written work
Source
– peer
Mode
– written
Size
– individual
Focus
– selective
Form
– comments
Amount
– single piece
Peer
reviews are a useful and valuable part of the editing process. Comments from
teachers are often seen as commands, whereas peer comments are less
authoritarian and encourage
learners to self-edit and be more self-reliant.
Peer review also encourages collaboration.
However, in
order to be successful, learners need guidance into how to review their peers’
work, especially at the beginning. Questions, checklists or forms make the
process more focused
and guide the students in how to provide feedback for
their peers. An example is shown below.
Peer
Review Comment Form
My first
impression is
My
favourite part is
The part
that can be most improved is
Some
language mistakes I noticed are
You could
add
Overall, I
think
Students
need training and guidance.
Peer
evaluation can be used as a final step in the writing process before teacher
evaluation.
Looking
at other’s work can help learners to develop their own writing and self-editing
skills.
https://educacionadistancia.juntadeandalucia.es/profesorado/mod/book/tool/print/index.php?id=434327 7/8
12/12/21 11:53 4.3 Giving feedback on written work
Source
– self
Mode
– written
Size
– individual
Focus
– selective
Form
– checklist
Amount
– single piece
Learners
need to learn how to self-edit their own work and a checklist can help them to
develop this skill. They can use the checklist with a partner, looking at each
of their work in turn. There
is an example below:
Self-Evaluation
Checklist
Yes No
Self-editing
is an important part of the writing process.
The
checklist can be used as a final stage before handing the work in.
You
can adapt the checklist according to the writing task.
https://educacionadistancia.juntadeandalucia.es/profesorado/mod/book/tool/print/index.php?id=434327 8/8