AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY IN PROCEDURE

TEXT FOR THE THIRD SEMESTER IN ENGLISH DEPARTEMENT OF

STKIP YPM BANGKO ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021

Intania Prananda Putri1, Hera Hartati,S.Pd.,M.Pd2, Diyan Andriani, S.S.,M.Pd3

English Education Program STKIP YPM
Intaniaputri0912@gmail.com, hera.adit@gmail.com, fahmidiyan35@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

This research to analyze students’ speaking abilities in Procedure text for The Third
Semester in English Departement of STKIP YPM Bangko Academic Year 2020/2021. The
researcher found some facts contained at third semester English department in speaking
ability. there are some problem faced by students. The first problem is pronounciation
because they did not practise english language in their daily activity, intraction social and
also the english language is not like mother thongue. Second is grammar because that is
difficut to remember when they speaking that always pay attantion with grammar structure.
Third is limitted vecabullary, they still lack knowlage about english words. And the last they
have less confidence because students still not fluency speaking english. The researcher use
Quantitative descriptive. The research populatian was students of third semester Englis
eduacation program. It is use total sampling that consist a class of population and sample was
25 students, but only 21 studnets submitted the test. The instrument of the research was the
test used content validity, expert validity and reliability used inter-rates reability it means
more then one scorer to analize the test. In this research use two scorer, the first is reseacher
and the second is the lecture of subject speaking 1. The test use oral presentation, the score is
3 for excellet, 2 for good, 1 for fair and 0 for poor. After that the researcher classification the
students’ Speaking Ability in Procedure text based on the answer sheet. Based on the result
was found that from 21 students’ seven students’ get score A (33,3%) and three students’ get
score A- (14,3%), two students’ get score B+ (9,5%), four students’ get score B- (19,0), two
students’ get score B (9,5%), one students’ get score C (4,8%), one students’ get score C-
(4,8%) and the one students get score E (4,8%). And the average score of students’ speaking
ability in Procedure text in the third semester was (80).then the category of ability based on
catalog book of STKIP YPM was good with quality of score (B). It means that the students’
ability in speaking is satified.

Key words: Speaking ability, procedure text, Quantitative descriptive

INTRODUCTION
The english language is
international language, that most of people
in the word learn it. Because english
language is the way for person get some
their goals. It support students’ language
profiency in formal and non formal
education. In modren era right now, non
formal and formal education same need to
learning english for get english sertificate
and get english knowladge.
There are four english language
skills known as well are speaking,
listening, writing and reading.
Eventhought all off skill are important, the
students have to mastaring one of the skills
as a must. If we can say speaking is the
fundamental speaking skill, cause by
speaking hope the students can express
what they want to expressing, like express
their feel, and verbally conveying their
ideas and feelings to another.
REVIEW RELATED LITERATURE
Speaking
Speaking is skill that important for
student to learn. According to Thornbury
(2005:8) that speaking is tools for human
to communicate with other human and
express what they feel, idea or just
opinions.
Component of Speaking
And this the components of
speaking, According to (Hormaililis,
2003: 6), they are :
Vocabulary Ur (in Hormailis
2003:6) vecabulary is support sistems in
learning English. Grammar speaker must
structure and match with the conversation.
The last fluency, that how people know
you are able to speaking in english. And
the conclude of that expalation, in every
communication and in the conversation
must be pay attention with the vecabulary
in every word, structure of the grammar
and also the fluency when speak with
other.
Procedure Text
As known there some of text genre
Procedure text is incluling one of the them.
this research showed, that the procedure
text is parts of writing that telling us
information by making even doing
something through some steps and
directions. This was that text procedure to
create something with intructional to do
the thing with step and step, the firstly
until the lastly for getting the right result.
One of that like how to make a cake. then
how can people know what they do if did
not intruction or text procedure for do that
step by step. So that, everything in these
words needed the procedure to making life
more become structured.
Generic structure of Procedure text
The teory of generic stucture of
procedure text according to Anderson and
Anderson (1997:52-55), state that generic
structure of a procedure text contains:
1. the aim or goal, what is the purpose or
what something want to make it.
2. the material, something that we need
to complete the procedure
3. and step, the way how we begin until
finals.
Language features of Procedure text
Language features of Procedure
text, According to Andeerson and
Anderrson (1997:52), the component of
linguistic feature in procedure text there
are :
1. Used of technic in language
2. the sentence start from the verbs and
ready to do as instruction
3. the used number or time for doing that
procedure
4. The use Adverbs to how the intruction
should be finish.
Table 1. The example of text procedure
The example of text procedure
Goal/ aim The steps of making fluffy pancake
Materials - 5 egs
- 40 grams sugar
- 60 grams purpose flour
- 2 grams baking powder
- Salts
- 1 teaspoons vanila extracts
- Honey
Prosedure/ steps 1. Firstly, separating the eggs yolk and
the white. After that beating the eggs
white until reach stiff.
2. Second, mixing the eggs yolks with
sugar in separated bowl until the sugar
melting.
3.Put baking powder,salt and flour.
Mixing them slowly until all ingredients
are mixed completely.
4. After all of them mixed correctly then
pour all ingredients to the bowl prepared
before. Extract and mix the ingredientss
with vanilla.
5. set temperature of the pan by over low
and medium heat coating it with some
butter. By Using a ¼ cup measuring it to
scop and droop the butter into a pan so
after that you could get evenly-sized
pancake.
6. next step is, cook it untill the first side
become golden brown, or the top surface
become forms of bubbles.
7. then flip or repeat on the another side.
Adjusting the heat accordiingly.
8. the last step is, serving the pancake
with some honey even it is still warmed.
The finishing we can add some fruits
like grapees or strawbery to make it
looks good or more delicious.
Numbering/
conjungtion
First, next, then, finally
Intraction command stir, mix, add
Adverbs Slowly
https://www.studiobelajar.com/procedure-
text/
RESEARCH METHOD
Research design
This type of research used in this
research is quantitative research with a
descriptive approach. Quantitative research
methods are one type of research whose
used the numberic data and analize the
data. According to Sugiyono (2013: 13),
Quantitaive researach methods can be
interpreted as research methods on a
particular population or sample. The
sampling techniques the part important for
collecting the data of the research.
In this research, researcher used
quantitative. Sugiyono (in Richards and
Schamidh 2002:436) stated, that method
used the data or number.
Population and sample
Population
According to Sugiyono (2018:130)
to meaning the population as the area
whose had quality and some characteristict
to make the researcher choose that
population for learning and to get the
result.
Table 2.Population of the class
Class Amount Gender
Class A English
Department 21 female
25 Students
semester third
4 male
(taken from staff of english
education program)
Sample
The sample of this research is take
of population existing use total sampling
technique, According to Arikunto (in
Herman 2011:31) if total of population
less of 100, so all of population can be
sample. So the sample population of this
research is all of population existing
because total of population less tahn 100.
Based on the explenation the reseacher use
total sampling.
Instrument of The Research
Instrumental in this research is a
test. According to Arikunto (2008:33),the
test for the researcher is part importhat to
find the information to colleting the data
for the research.The test in this research
will use, oral presenttion. To know
students’ speaking ability. Beside that
 c. the main idea or point was clearly
researcher use the test to the sample, the started toward the beginning.
test will Validity and Rehability test. the supporting points were
First According to Arikunto (in d. Clearly expressed
e. Supported well by facts, argument
Syofian2013 : 46 ), validity is shows the
f. the conclution restated the main idea or
tools for makesure the result. it uses purpose.
content and expert validity. Second, 2. Delivery :
a. the speakeer used gesstures and body
According to Sugiono (2005), the meaning language wel.

of reliability is some instrument or tools b. the speakerr maintaining eyes contact

with the audiences.
who had konsistension used for make sure
c. the speakers didn’t use note (and do
the result with the way over and over reading a script verbal).

again. d. the speaker’s languages were natural

and fluent.
Technique of Collecting data e. the speaker’s volumee of spech is
Test appropriated.
f. the speeaker’s rate of spech was
According to Arikunto (2010:193), appropriated.
g. the speaker’s pronunciations is clear and
the test can be question or another way to comprehensibly.
measure the skill, abilities or talets by h. the speaker’s gramar is corrected and
didn’t preventing understand.
individual or more then one. Kind of test is
i.the speaker’s using visual aid, handout,
will be students to asked to make a video etc., effective.
with the material procedure text. It means j. the speaker’s shows entusiasm and
interesting.
the students will make a video with
procedure text and sent the video to the
lecture. Source : adapted from H. Douglas Brown,
Technique of Analyzing data (2010 : 219)
The collected data found in this Classifying the Score
study is quantitative analyzes, it means Based on Scoring of Oral
that all the data collected fromm doing the presentation that according from Brown
test. (2010:219).
1. Data redaction Note : 3 : Excellent, 2 : Good, 1 : Fair, 0 :
Data redaction is the first step that Poor
did to analyze data was taken of students : The researcher calculated about
The criteria used to evaluate students ability in procedure text by usinh
student performance are based on those this formula.
𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒
developed According to Brown, Score = 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒
x 100
(2010:219), for oaral presentations, a Nb : The maximal score = 48
checlist or grid is a common means of 2. Data display
scoring or evaluation. After researcher got students’
Table 3. Oral Presentation scoring speaking ability score, next step is
categories presented that score to table based on the
SCORE
NO Criteria of Value criteria of study result in STKIP YPM
3 2 1 0
1. Content : Bangko. The data from students’ score will
a. the purpose of objective of the be describe based on quality in this
presentation was accomplished
assessment.
b. the introduction was lively and got my
attention. Table 4. Assessment of study result
Quality on Score research from the result of test of students.
Alphabet
The sample collection by task. The data
A 88 – 100
A- 83 – 87 collection of student task in procedure text,
B+ 78 – 82 the data was videos. The students is 25 but
B 73 – 77 only 21 students sent the video, 4 students
B- 68 – 72
did not collect. Some of them have
C+ 63 – 67
C 58 – 62 different ability at oral presentation in
C- 53 – 57 procedure text. This process is carried out
D 48 – 52 to analyze speaking abilities in procedure
E <48
text at third semester of STKIP YPM
Sources : Catalog STKIP YPM Bangko
Bangko. to know students ability in
(2015:25)
recount text, the researcher use indicator
After the researche rcalculated of
content and delivery.
each students’ ability in procedure text by
The result of students speaking
using simple statistical technique from
ability in procedure text can be seen as
Sudijono (2009:40) the formula as follow.
𝐹 follow the table :
P = 𝑛 100% Table 6. Students’ speaking ability
In which : in procedure text
P : The classes of percentage Quality
F : Total of percentages of Quality of amount of
percentage
number score student
n : the student amount value
In completing the numberical data, 88-100 A 7 33,3
the researcher try to get an average score 83-87 A- 3 14,3
students’ speaking ability in text 78-82 B+ 2 9,5
procedure. In this researcher using the 73-77 B 4 19,0
average of students’ calculated by Sugiono 68-72 B- 2 9,5
(2007), Mean formula : 63-67 C+ 0 0,0
∑𝑥𝑖 58-62 C 1 4,8
𝑀𝑒 = 𝑛 53-57 C- 1 4,8
In which : 48-52 D 0 0,0
Me : Mean <47 E 1 4,8
∑ : Epsilon (puncituation) TOTAL 21 100,0
Xi : Score x to i until n Figure 1 : students’ speaking
n : Number of student ability in procedure text
3. Conclusion 150
100,0
The reseacher get the conclude of the 100
result, how to significant progress and how 50 33,3
19,0 21
7 14,3
3 9,5
2 4 9,5 0 4,8
2 0,0 1 4,8 0 4,8
1 0,0 1
far students’ in their speaking ability at 0
third semester.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
1. General Finding
quality of number
The research was conduct the data of quality of score
this research starting on October 26 th
Based on the table above, from 21
2020 until April 26 th 2021. Data of the
students’ seven students’get score A
(33,3%) and three students’ get score A- <47 E 1 5
(14,3%), two students’ get score B+ TOTAL 21 100

(9,5%), four students’ get score B- Figure 2 : students’ speaking Ability in

(19,0%), two students’ get score B (9,5%), Procedure text content indicator
one student get score C (4,8%), one CONTENT INDICATOR
120
students’ get score C- (4,8%) and the one 100
100
students get score E (4,8%). 80
In addition the average score of 60
students speaking ability in procedure text 40 29
14 19 10 21
20 10
was (80). The category of ability based on 06 03 04 02 000 02 015 015 015 015
0
catalog book of STKIP YPM was good
with quality of score (B). It means that the quality of score amount of students percentage
students ability in speaking is not satified
Delivery indicator
yet.
Based on Delivery indicator eight
2. Specific Finding
students’ get score (A), two students’ get
a. Students’ speaking ability based on
score (A-), one students’ get score (B+),
each indicator content indicator
five students’ get score (B), three students’
in this indicator, there was five sub
get score (B-), one students’get score (C-)
indicators, and based on the content
and the one students’ get score (E). The
indicator, there were the result six
average score of students ability in
students’ get score (A), three students’ get
procedure text of delivery indicator was
score (A- ), four students’ get score ( B+),
82.
two students’ get score (B ), two students’
Table 8. Students’ Speaking Ability in
get score ( C+ ), one students’ get score
Procedure text Delivery Indicator
(C), one students’ get score (C), one
amount
students’ get score (C-), one students’ get Quality of quality of
of Percentage
Number score
score (D), and the one studnets’ get score students
(E). The average score of students ability 88-100 A 8 38

in procedure text of content indicator was 83-87 A- 2 10

78-82 B+ 1 5
(78).
73-77 B 5 24
68-72 B- 3 14
Table 7. students’ speaking ability in
63-67 C+ 0 0
procedure text content indicator. 58-62 C 0 0
amount
Quality of quality of 53-57 C- 1 5
of percentage
Number score 48-52 D 0 0
students
88-100 A 6 29 <47 E 1 5

83-87 A- 3 14 TOTAL 21 100

78-82 B+ 4 19 Figure 4. Students’ Speaking Ability in

73-77 B 2 10 Procedure Text
68-72 B- 0 0
63-67 C+ 2 10
58-62 C 1 5
53-57 C- 1 5
48-52 D 1 5
150 DELIVERY INDICATOR
100
38
50 24 14
08 0210 015 05 03 000 000 015 000 015
0 This study provides information
quality of score amount of students
CONCLUTION AND SUGGESTION
Conclution
Based on explanation above, the
researches can conclude that from 21
students 2 students didn’t pass get
insufficient quality value, from the test of
procedure text at the third semester of
english department in STKIP YPM
Bangko academic year 2020/2021, and
there were 19 students can pass the test in
procedure text in indicator content and
delivery. The researcher found the most
students scored low on the part of content
in point (f) the conclution restated the
main idea or purpose (57%), and the most
students scorer high on the part of content
in point (a) the purpose of objective of the
presentation was accomplised (95%) and
part of delivery in point (i) the speaker’s
use visual aids, handouts, etc (95%).C-
(4,8%) and the one students get score E
(4,8%).
Suggestion
From the result of the research,
researcher wants to give the suggestion:
1. For Students
Students must often practice
speaking with other people who have
knowlage or background in English, like
friends, lecture or someone else. For
students, especially students English
Deparment of STKIP YPM Bangko.
2. For lecturer
Based on the research, lecture was
teached the student very well, but may be
the students need more practice than
material or theory. Couse in their daily
100 activity practice English language more
important thing.
21 3. for another researcher
about students speaking ability in
percentage
procedure text for the third semester in
English deparment. For ther further, must
be need a lot of theory and material.
Because based on this
research not really perfect too. And maybe
the another researcher can make the thesis
more better.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anas, Sudijono. 2009. Pengantar statistik
pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja
Grafindo Persada.
Anderson, Mark and Anderson, Kahty.
1997. Text Type in English. South
Yarra: Macmillan Educaton
Australia PTY LTD.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur
Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan
Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Brown, H.D & Abey Wichkrama. 2010.
Language learning assessment
principles and classroom practice.
New York: Pearson Education Inc.
Hormailis, 2003. The use of groups works
techiques for the improvement of
speakiing abiliity the second year
student of MAN 2 Pekanbaru.
Pekanbaru: Unpublished thesis.
Sugiono. 2007. Statistik untuk Penelitian.
Bandung: CV Alfabeta
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian
Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan
R&D.Bandung: Alfabeta.