You are on page 1of 4

1. Risk Evaluation.

Severity
It is related to the direct impact to persons. Following is the classification of severity assessment.
Severit
Score Definition
y Level

1 Risk Not likely to cause an effect/impact to safety of life and property.


Low 2 Minor – Little potential for harm, easily correctable, clearable
Mediu
3 Moderate – Somewhat harmful, short term loss
m
High 4 Serious – Harmful – difficult to correct but recoverable over a period of time
Very
5 Severe – Fatality / Very harmful to HSE, Complex long-term effect.
High

Frequency of Occurrence
It is related to the number of times it occurs compared to the last incident. Following is the
Score Frequency of Occurrence
5 Very likely – High probability of HSE accident to occur. (daily/weekly/monthly)

Likely – Strong Probability that an HSE impact / dangerous occurrence will occur
4
(quarterly)
Possible – Reasonable probability that an HSE incident / near-miss may occur. (annually)
3

2 Unlikely– Low probability, have heard about this few years / months ago (2-5 years)
1 Rare – Very unlikely (5-10 years)

Assessment Matrix
Frequency RPN score Risk Level

Risk Level 5 4 3 2 1 1≤x≤4 Low (L)

Severit 25 20 15 10
5 5 (M) 5≤x≤9 Medium (M)
y (VH) (VH) (VH) (H)
20
4 16 (H) 12 (H) 8 (M) 4 (L) 10 ≤ x ≤ 16 High (H)
(VH)

3 15 (H) 12 (H) 9 (M) 6 (M) 3 (L) 17 ≤ x ≤ 25 Very High (VH)

2 10 (M) 8 (M) 6 (M) 4 (L) 2 (L)

1 5 (M) 4 (L) 3(L) 2(L) 1(L)

2. Risk Assessment Output


•For every ac vity the Cross Func onal Team (CFT) team should document whether the ac vity is
a Routine (R), Non-Routine (NR).
•Document the associated Hazard/ Aspect and Risk / Impact.
•If Ac vity which has a risk of life or risk of fire or severe environmental impact should be
considered as an Emergency by denoting Yes (Y) in the column Provided.
•For the iden fied ac vity, gather informa on from interested par es. If the ac vity has any
concern with respect to HSE. If any concern is raised, document it as Yes (Y).
•If the ac vity has a legal concern, document as Yes (Y). Examples of Legal concern could be in
the form of: Storage of Hazardous waste, Working at heights
•Evaluate if the Hazard in the work process has a Legal implica on. If yes, indicate by deno ng
“Y” in the cell contained.
•Should there be an instance where any of the columns of Emergency (E), Interested Party
Concern (IPC) / Legal Concern (LC) is applicable and is denoted by “Y” then these concerns will be
an Overriding Criteria and not be evaluated further, But will be identified as a Significant risk by
denoting “S” in the column provided.
•Risks which do not have Emergency / Interested Party Concern (IPC) / Legal Concern (LC) should
be denote by indicating “N” (No)
•Risks where overriding criteria (Interested Party Concern (IPC) / Legal Concern (LC)) are not
applicable, should be considered for Risk Assessment.
•Any ac vity which is having Present / Exis ng controls, should be men oned in column provided.
•The risk criteria for severity and Frequency of occurrence is applied to HSE risks as per the table
provided in appendix and present risk factor is calculated and mentioned in the column provided
here in.
•Any HSE risk having a risk factor above and equal to 5 is considered significant and gradually
lowered to cover all the HSE risks stages such that at one state all risks will be suitably addressed.
•Any ac vi es which are not listed in any regula on and have no exis ng control, the severity is
rated as 3 and the risk is considered as Significant.
RISK IDENTIFICATION, ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL FORM
OPERATION / SPECIFIC LOCATION DATE:
ACTIVITY
DESCRIPTION:

Frequency

Frequency of Occurrences
Calculated significance
IPC (Interested Party
Activity Type (R / NR)

LC (Legal Concern)

Presentofrisk

Present risk factor


E (emergency)

Final (S/NS)
Severity (S)
Concern)

Severity
Task/equipm Present / Existing Controls added to

(F)
S/N Hazards/aspects Risk/impact
ent controls reduce risks

Occurrences
factor
when mixing Cause chemical training, administrative 5 2 10 S the right PPE should be 5 1 5 S
chemicals are burns on skin. controls to insunate the used
exposed to the Damage surfaces. risk of slip trip and fal,
skin, solid metal Cause blindness. use of elastostoic nose
surfaces, eyes, Harm your lungs mask, hand glooves,
inhaled, or and throat if safety boots, SOPs
ingested. inhaled.
When the mixing Be explosive
mixer R Y Y Y
chemicals are under certain
done at conditions.
unfavourable Be fatal if ingested
conditions. slip, trip and fall
Working are height

during operation risk of crushing presence of guards, 5 1 5 S administrative signs as 5 1 5 S


when soap flakes fingers training, SOPs regards safety signages,
Soap 'Roll mill are being produced R Y Y Y update the SOPs

area of the rollers risk of cut and prsence of guards, 5 1 5 S administrative signs as 5 1 5 S
Plodder producing soap crushing fingers R Y Y Y training, SOPs regards safety signages,
worms SOPs
cutting to size and risk of trainings, presently a 5 3 15 S installation of guards, 5 1 5 S
stamping of fingers/limps metal rod is use to administrative signs as
company crest on being cut off or remove clugged soap in regards safety signages,
the soap crushed the area, SOPs Engineer a mechanism
Stampper R Y Y Y to remove clogged soap
the will remove the
frequent human contact
with it, SOPs

during wrapping of risk of burns none 3 3 9 S the presence of Guards 3 1 3 NS


soap with primary for protection, re-activate
packing materil safety devices on the
machine, use of heat
wrapping resistant hand glooves
R Y Y N
Machine when carrying out
maintenace, SOPs

during packaging risk of burns the presence of guards 3 2 6 S in some of the 3 1 3 NS


of product with machines, repair broken
secondary guards, re-activate
packaing material safety devices on the
Bonding machine, use of heat
R Y Y N resistant hand glooves
Machine
when carrying out
maintenace, SOPs
NS

NS

You might also like