Data Base Lifeline Exposureto Hazard

% Score % Score
0.00% 1 0.00% 4
5.00% 2 5.00% 3
10.00% 3 10.00% 2
20.00% 4 20.00% 1
H Hazard/Likelihood Score Risk = HEV, where V = S/Ac

E Exposure Score SevCon = EV
S Sensitivity Score
Ac Adaptive Capacity Score
V Vulnerability Score (Sensitivity and Adaptive Capacity)
SevCon Severity of Consequence Score (Exposure and Vulnerability)
R Risk Score
Indicative Likelihood of Occurrence Scores
Measures of
Return Period in Years Likelihood Score
Likelihood
Frequent Every 1-3 years 6
Moderate Every >3-10 years 5
Occasional Every >10-30 years 4
Improbable Every >30-100 years 3
Rare event Every >100-200 years 2
Source: Reference
Very rare event Manual on Mainstreaming Disaster
Every >200 years Risk Reduction and
1 Climate
Change Adaptation in the Comprehensive Land Use Plans Report, NEDA-HLURB-UNDP
,2012
Risk Scores
Severity of Consequence Score (EV)

Indicative Likelihood Likelihood of
of Occurrence Occurrence Score Very High High Moderate
4 3 2
Frequent
(1-3 Years) 6 24 18 12
Moderate
5 20 15 10
(4-10 Years)
Occasional Slight
Chance 4 16 12 8
(11-30 Years)
Improbable
3 12 9 6
(31-100 Years)
Rare
2 8 6 4
(101-200 Years)
Very Rare
1 4 3 2
(>200 Years)
>12 High Risk Areas
5-12 Moderate Risk Areas
5< Low Risk Areas
Scoring for Capacity and willingness to retrofit/relocate Adaptive Capacity Indicator
AC Score Description
(A) - The owner or concerned

1 administration has a plan, capacity and
willingness to retrofit/ relocate
(B) - The owner or concerned administrator

2 has the capacity to retrofit/ relocate but no
plan yet
(C) - The owner or concerned administrator

3 has capacity to retrofit/ relocate but not
willing
4 (D) - No capacity to retrofit/ relocate
Scoring for Presence and adherence to Government Regulations Adaptive Capacity Indicator
AC Score Description
(A) - Local government is implementing
existing regulations on hazard mitigation
1
and structural design and monitors
compliance thereof
(B) - Local government is implementing

2 existing regulations on hazard mitigation
and structural design
(C) - Local government has existing

3 regulations on hazard mitigation and
structural design
(D) - Local government has no regulations

4
on hazard mitigation and structural design
Note: Road Construction cost: Mun & Bry- 1m/100meters

National 1km/16million
% Score
Low 4
Moderate 3
High 2
Very High 1
ere V = S/Ac
core (EV)
Low
1
1
IDENTIFICATION HAZARD
Barangay Name Name of Street Flood

Classification
(if any) Susceptibility
National, Provincial, Low, Moderate, High

Municipal or Barangay
Municipal Road Rizal High

1 Poblacion 2
Municipal Road Malvar High
Municipal Road Don Pedro High
2 Poblacion 3 Municipal Road Lopez St. High
Municipal Road Fababeir St. High
3 Poblacion 5 Municipal Road Luis Lim St. High
National High
Poblacion 1 Municipal High
Barangay High
National High
National Moderate
National Low
Poblacion 6
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
National High
National Moderate
National Low
Bintuan
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Low
Provincial High
Buenavista Provincial Moderate
Barangay High
Barangay High
Bulalacao
Barangay Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Borac
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Provincial High
Decabobo Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
Provincial High
Decalachao Provincial Moderate
Decalachao
Provincial Low
National High
National Moderate
Guadalupe National Low
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
Marcilla Provincial High
Provincial Low
National High
San Jose
National Moderate
National High
National Moderate
San Nicolas Municipal High
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Provincial Moderate
Tagumpay Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
Provincial High
Provincial Low
Provincial Moderate
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Turda
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low

HAZARD EXPOSURE
Likelihood of Expected Flood Affected Length Percentage of

Total Length (m)
Occurrence Score Depth (m) Affected Length
Thru Anecdotal ≤1m for moderate and Affected Length

Total length of road Affected length of
Account Low
(GIS derived) road (GIS derived) divided by Total
(Score range 1-6) ≥1m for high Length
5 ≥1m 327.04 21.03 6.43%

5 ≥1m 200.00 200.00 100.00%
5 ≥1m 500.00 100.00 20.00%
5 ≥1m 50.00 30.00 60.00%
5 ≥1m 180.00 30.00 16.67%
5 ≥1m 400.00 40.01 10.00%
5 ≥1m 1000.00 45.00 4.50%
5 ≥1m 300.00 20.00 6.67%
5 ≥1m 100.00 22.08 22.08%
5 ≥1m 3000.00 100.00 3.33%
4 ≥1m 154.77 154.77 100.00%
3 ≥1m 47.60 47.60 100.00%
5 ≥1m 12000.00 584.57 4.87%
4 ≥1m 151.02 151.02 100.00%
3 ≥1m 388.85 388.85 100.00%
5 ≥1m 1067.53 1067.53 100.00%
5 ≥1m 423.59 423.59 100.00%
2 ≥1m 495.02 495.02 100.00%
5 ≥1m 70.70 70.70 100.00%
4 ≥1m 17.31 17.31 99.98%
3 ≥1m 46.56 46.56 100.00%
5 ≥1m 12000.00 376.74 3.14%
4 ≥1m 12000.00 230.59 1.92%
5 ≥1m 100.00 34.20 34.20%
5 ≥1m 600.00 66.42 11.07%
4 ≥1m 600.00 433.10 72.18%
5 ≥1m 15000.00 849.14 5.66%
5 ≥1m 15000.00 459.40 3.06%
5 ≥1m 5000.00 129.69 2.59%
5 ≥1m 5000.00 173.51 3.47%
5 ≥1m 10000.00 132.24 1.32%
5 ≥1m 10000.00 37.45 0.37%
3 ≥1m 10000.00 9.10 0.09%
4 ≥1m 14000.00 590.94 4.22%
4 ≥1m 14000.00 1878.41 13.42%
2 ≥1m 14000.00 2730.02 19.50%
5 ≥1m 8500.00 1149.38 13.52%
4 ≥1m 8500.00 370.16 4.35%
2 ≥1m 8500.00 33.96 0.40%
6 ≥1m 4700.00 230.37 4.90%
4 ≥1m 4700.00 89.95 1.91%
2 ≥1m 4700.00 655.11 13.94%
5 ≥1m 5959.00 848.19 14.23%
4 ≥1m 5959.00 1074.73 18.04%
5 ≥1m 8256.28 86.92 1.05%
5 ≥1m 8256.28 67.95 0.82%
5 ≥1m 5130.67 873.62 17.03%
4 ≥1m 5130.67 245.83 4.79%
5 ≥1m 1574.57 71.11 4.52%
5 ≥1m 925.90 30.20 3.26%
4 ≥1m 925.90 53.98 5.83%
4 ≥1m 5449.14 200.64 3.68%
4 ≥1m 5673.01 92.04 1.62%
3 ≥1m 5449.14 117.50 2.16%
5 ≥1m 4400.53 217.05 4.93%
3 ≥1m 4400.53 70.08 1.59%
4 ≥1m 4400.53 70.55 1.60%
5 ≥1m 343.90 26.53 7.71%
4 ≥1m 454.01 89.76 19.77%
4 ≥1m 587.07 43.57 7.42%
5 ≥1m 305.54 18.35 6.01%
4 ≥1m 343.90 35.78 10.40%
4 ≥1m 454.01 78.73 17.34%
4 ≥1m 587.07 42.67 7.27%
3 ≥1m 208.69 26.77 12.83%
3 ≥1m 171.63 67.56 39.36%
3 ≥1m 350.66 64.13 18.29%
3 ≥1m 437.48 230.89 52.78%
3 ≥1m 247.66 73.19 29.55%
3 ≥1m 305.54 7.62 2.49%
2 ≥1m 85.93 18.06 21.02%
2 ≥1m 437.48 128.55 29.38%
ROADS EXPOSURE TO FLOODIN
EXPOSURE
Exposure Score Replacement/ Exposure Average

for Affected Construction Affected Value Score for Exposure Surface Type
Length Cost Affected Value Score
Construction
Exposure Score for Construction Cost Affeted Length x Exposure Score Sum of exposure materials used Sensitivity
proportion of per meter construction cost for proportion of scores divided by (e.g. concrete, Score
affected length (optional) per meter affected length 2 (optional) asphalt, gravel, (subject to
(optional) (optional) dirt) change)
1 10,000 210,300 1 1 concrete 1

4 10,000 2,000,000 2 3 concrete 1
2 10,000 1,000,000 1 1.5 concrete 1
4 10,000 300,000 1 2.5 concrete 1
2 10,000 300,000 1 1.5 concrete 1
2 10,000 400,100 1 1.5 concrete 1
1 16,000 720,000 1 1 concrete 1
1 10,000 200,000 1 1 concrete 1
3 10,000 220,765 1 2 concrete 1
1 16,000 1,600,000 2 1.5 concrete 1
4 16,000 2,476,330 3 3.5 concrete 1
4 16,000 761,628 1 2.5 concrete 1
1 10,000 5,845,742 3 2 gravel 3
4 10,000 1,510,234 2 3 gravel 3
4 10,000 3,888,500 3 3.5 gravel 3
4 16,000 17,080,480 3 3.5 concrete 1
4 16,000 6,777,430 3 3.5 concrete 1
4 16,000 7,920,320 3 3.5 concrete 1
4 10,000 706,965 1 2.5 gravel 3
4 10,000 173,100 1 2.5 gravel 3
4 10,000 465,600 1 2.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 3,767,400 3 2 gravel 3
1 10,000 2,305,900 3 2 gravel 3
3 1,000 34,200 1 2 gravel 3
2 10,000 664,240 1 1.5 gravel 3
4 10,000 4,331,000 3 3.5 gravel 3
1 16,000 13,586,240 3 2 gravel 3
1 16,000 7,350,400 3 2 gravel 3
1 10,000 1,296,900 2 1.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 1,735,100 2 1.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 1,322,400 2 1.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 374,500 1 1 gravel 3
1 10,000 91,000 1 1 gravel 3
1 16,000 9,455,040 3 2 concrete 1
2 16,000 30,054,560 3 2.5 concrete 1
2 16,000 43,680,320 4 3 concrete 1
2 16,000 18,390,080 3 2.5 concrete 1
1 16,000 5,922,560 3 2 concrete 1
1 16,000 543,360 1 1 concrete 1
1 16,000 3,685,920 3 2 concrete 1
1 16,000 1,439,200 2 1.5 concrete 1
2 16,000 10,481,760 3 2.5 concrete 1
2 10,000 8,481,931 3 2.5 gravel 3
2 10,000 10,747,273 3 2.5 gravel 3
1 16,000 1,390,796 2 1.5 concrete 1
1 16,000 1,087,151 2 1.5 concrete 1
2 16,000 13,977,877 3 2.5 gravel 3
1 16,000 3,933,255 3 2 gravel 3
1 10,000 711,110 1 1 gravel 3
1 10,000 301,958 1 1 gravel 3
1 10,000 539,765 1 1 gravel 3
1 10,000 2,006,427 3 2 gravel 3
1 10,000 920,365 1 1 gravel 3
1 10,000 1,175,040 2 1.5 gravel 3
1 16,000 3,472,801 3 2 gravel 3
1 16,000 1,121,244 2 1.5 gravel 3
1 16,000 1,128,834 2 1.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 265,279 1 1 gravel 3
2 10,000 897,625 1 1.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 435,667 1 1 gravel 3
1 10,000 183,477 1 1 gravel 3
2 10,000 357,782 1 1.5 gravel 3
2 10,000 787,297 1 1.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 426,735 1 1 gravel 3
2 10,000 267,672 1 1.5 gravel 3
3 10,000 675,612 1 2 gravel 3
2 10,000 641,264 1 1.5 gravel 3
4 10,000 2,308,939 3 3.5 gravel 3
3 10,000 731,897 1 2 gravel 3
1 10,000 76,165 1 1 gravel 3
3 10,000 180,587 1 2 gravel 3
3 10,000 1,285,522 2 2.5 gravel 3
SURE TO FLOODING AND RISK ASSESSMENT
VULNERABILITY
Percentage of structures
Employing Resilient with no access/area
Existing Condition Year Constructed
Design coverage to infrastructure
related mitigation measures
Qualitative assessment of Before 1980, Est. percentage

the existing condition of 1980-1990, 1990- covered by
the distribution/access Sensitivity 2000, 2000 and Sensitivity Yes or No Sensitivity infrastructure-
network (excellent, good, Score above (year Score Score related
fair, poor/condemned) ranges can be measures
adjusted)
good 2 2000 1 no 4 14.00%

good 2 2000 1 no 4 12.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 13.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1992 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1994 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2004 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2004 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2004 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2004 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2010 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2015 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1986 3 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1986 3 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2003 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1986 3 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1986 3 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1999 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1999 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1999 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2006 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2006 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2006 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 1993 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1995 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1995 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1993 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1993 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2005 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2003 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2003 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
with no access/area Capacity and willingness to
Insurance Coverage Government Investments
overage to infrastructure retrofit
ated mitigation measures
Capacity of
Est. percentage of government to make
Adaptive see Scoring tab (A, B, Adaptive property covered Adaptive Capacity investments in CCA-
Capacity Score C, D) Capacity Score by insurance Score DRR (low, moderate,
high, very high)
3 A 1 40.00% 1 moderate
3 B 2 15.00% 3 moderate
3 B 2 15.00% 3 moderate
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate

administration has a plan,
capacity and willingness to
retrofit/ relocate
(B) - The owner or concerned

administrator has the capacity
to retrofit/ relocate but no plan
yet
(C) - The owner or concerned
administrator has capacity to
retrofit/ relocate but not willing
(D) - No capacity to retrofit/

relocate
Severity of
Government Regulations on Vulnerability Risk
Consequence
overnment Investments hazard mitigation zoning and Score Score
Score
structural design standards
Average Severity of
Sensitivity Score Exposure Score Consequence
Adaptive Capacity see Scoring tab (A, Adaptive Capacity plus Average plus Vulnerability multiply
Score B, C, D) Score Adaptive Capacity Score divided by 2 to likelihood
Score divided by 2 of Occurrence
3 D 4 2.20 1.60 8.00

3 C 3 2.40 3.20 16.00
3 A 1 2.20 2.10 10.50
4 A 1 1.80 2.90 14.50
4 A 1 1.80 1.90 9.50
4 A 1 1.80 1.90 9.50
4 A 1 1.93 1.46 7.31
4 A 1 1.93 1.46 7.31
4 A 1 1.80 2.40 12.00
4 A 1 1.80 1.40 7.00
4 A 1 1.80 2.90 11.60
4 A 1 1.80 2.90 8.70
4 A 1 2.43 1.71 8.56
4 A 1 2.43 3.21 12.85
4 A 1 2.43 3.21 9.64
4 A 1 1.80 2.90 14.50
4 B 2 1.90 2.95 14.75
4 B 2 1.90 2.95 5.90
4 B 2 2.53 3.26 16.31
4 B 2 2.53 3.26 13.05
4 B 2 2.53 3.26 9.79
4 B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88
4 B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30
4 B 2 2.53 2.76 13.81
4 B 2 2.40 2.20 11.00
4 B 2 2.40 3.20 12.80
4 B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88
4 B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88
4 B 2 2.40 1.70 8.50
4 B 2 2.40 1.70 8.50
4 B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19
4 B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19
4 B 2 2.28 1.64 4.91
4 B 2 1.63 1.31 5.25
4 B 2 1.63 1.81 7.25
4 B 2 1.63 1.81 3.63
4 B 2 1.63 1.81 9.06
4 B 2 1.63 1.31 5.25
4 B 2 1.63 1.31 2.63
4 B 2 2.00 1.50 9.00
4 B 2 2.00 1.50 6.00
4 B 2 2.00 2.00 4.00
4 B 2 2.25 2.13 10.63
4 B 2 2.25 2.13 8.50
3 B 2 1.53 1.26 6.31
3 B 2 1.53 1.26 6.31
3 B 2 2.28 2.14 10.69
3 B 2 2.28 1.64 6.55
3 B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19
3 B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19
3 B 2 2.28 1.64 6.55
3 B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30
3 B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30
3 B 2 2.35 1.68 5.03
3 B 2 2.35 1.68 8.38
3 B 2 2.73 1.86 5.59
3 B 2 2.35 1.68 6.70
3 B 2 2.73 1.86 9.31
3 B 2 2.73 2.36 9.45
3 B 2 2.73 1.86 7.45
3 B 2 2.63 1.81 9.06
3 B 2 2.63 2.31 9.25
3 B 2 2.63 2.31 9.25
3 B 2 2.63 1.81 7.25
3 B 2 2.63 2.31 6.94
3 B 2 2.63 2.81 8.44
3 B 2 2.63 2.31 6.94
3 B 2 2.63 3.31 9.94
3 B 2 2.63 2.81 8.44
3 B 2 2.63 1.81 5.44
3 B 2 2.63 2.81 5.63
3 B 2 2.63 2.81 5.63
(A) - Local government is

implementing existing
regulations on hazard
mitigation and structural design
and monitors compliance
thereof
(B) - Local government is

(C) - Local government has

existing regulations on hazard
(D) - Local government has no

Risk
Category
see Scoring Tab
moderate
high
moderate
high
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
high
moderate
high
high
moderate
high
high
moderate
moderate
moderate
high
moderate
high
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
low
moderate
moderate
low
moderate
moderate
low
moderate
moderate
low
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
Barangay Name Name of Street Landslide

Classification
(if any) Susceptibility


1 Poblacion 2
National High
Barangay High
National High
National Moderate
National Low
Poblacion 6
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
National High
National Moderate
National Low
Bintuan
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Low
Provincial High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Bulalacao
Barangay Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Borac
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Low
Provincial High
Decalachao
Provincial Low
National High
National Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
Provincial Low
National High
San Jose
National Moderate
National High
National Moderate
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
Provincial High
Provincial Low
Provincial Moderate
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Turda
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low

HAZARD EXPOSURE
Exposure Score Replacement/

Likelihood of Affected Length Percentage of
Total Length (m) for Affected Construction
Occurrence Score (m) Affected Length
Length Cost
Thru Anecdotal Affected Length Exposure Score for Construction Cost

Account
(GIS derived) road (GIS derived) divided by Total proportion of per meter
(Score range 1-6) Length affected length (optional)
5 327.04 21.03 6.43% 1 10,000

5 200.00 200.00 100.00% 4 10,000
5 500.00 100.00 20.00% 2 10,000
5 50.00 30.00 60.00% 4 10,000
5 180.00 30.00 16.67% 2 10,000
5 400.00 40.01 10.00% 2 10,000
5 1000.00 45.00 4.50% 1 16,000
5 300.00 20.00 6.67% 1 10,000
5 100.00 22.08 22.08% 3 10,000
5 3000.00 100.00 3.33% 1 16,000
4 154.77 154.77 100.00% 4 16,000
3 47.60 47.60 100.00% 4 16,000
5 12000.00 584.57 4.87% 1 10,000
4 151.02 151.02 100.00% 4 10,000
3 388.85 388.85 100.00% 4 10,000
5 1067.53 1067.53 100.00% 4 16,000
5 423.59 423.59 100.00% 4 16,000
2 495.02 495.02 100.00% 4 16,000
5 70.70 70.70 100.00% 4 10,000
4 17.31 17.31 99.98% 4 10,000
3 46.56 46.56 100.00% 4 10,000
5 12000.00 376.74 3.14% 1 10,000
4 12000.00 230.59 1.92% 1 10,000
5 100.00 34.20 34.20% 3 1,000
5 600.00 66.42 11.07% 2 10,000
4 600.00 433.10 72.18% 4 10,000
5 15000.00 849.14 5.66% 1 16,000
5 15000.00 459.40 3.06% 1 16,000
5 5000.00 129.69 2.59% 1 10,000
5 5000.00 173.51 3.47% 1 10,000
5 10000.00 132.24 1.32% 1 10,000
5 10000.00 37.45 0.37% 1 10,000
3 10000.00 9.10 0.09% 1 10,000
4 14000.00 590.94 4.22% 1 16,000
4 14000.00 1878.41 13.42% 2 16,000
2 14000.00 2730.02 19.50% 2 16,000
5 8500.00 1149.38 13.52% 2 16,000
4 8500.00 370.16 4.35% 1 16,000
2 8500.00 33.96 0.40% 1 16,000
6 4700.00 230.37 4.90% 1 16,000
4 4700.00 89.95 1.91% 1 16,000
2 4700.00 655.11 13.94% 2 16,000
5 5959.00 848.19 14.23% 2 10,000
4 5959.00 1074.73 18.04% 2 10,000
5 8256.28 86.92 1.05% 1 16,000
5 8256.28 67.95 0.82% 1 16,000
5 5130.67 873.62 17.03% 2 16,000
4 5130.67 245.83 4.79% 1 16,000
5 1574.57 71.11 4.52% 1 10,000
5 925.90 30.20 3.26% 1 10,000
4 925.90 53.98 5.83% 1 10,000
4 5449.14 200.64 3.68% 1 10,000
4 5673.01 92.04 1.62% 1 10,000
3 5449.14 117.50 2.16% 1 10,000
5 4400.53 217.05 4.93% 1 16,000
3 4400.53 70.08 1.59% 1 16,000
4 4400.53 70.55 1.60% 1 16,000
5 343.90 26.53 7.71% 1 10,000
4 454.01 89.76 19.77% 2 10,000
4 587.07 43.57 7.42% 1 10,000
5 305.54 18.35 6.01% 1 10,000
4 343.90 35.78 10.40% 2 10,000
4 454.01 78.73 17.34% 2 10,000
4 587.07 42.67 7.27% 1 10,000
3 208.69 26.77 12.83% 2 10,000
3 171.63 67.56 39.36% 3 10,000
3 350.66 64.13 18.29% 2 10,000
3 437.48 230.89 52.78% 4 10,000
3 247.66 73.19 29.55% 3 10,000
3 305.54 7.62 2.49% 1 10,000
2 85.93 18.06 21.02% 3 10,000
2 437.48 128.55 29.38% 3 10,000
ROADS EXPOSURE TO FLOODING AND RISK ASSES
VULNERABILITY
Exposure Average
Affected Value Score for Exposure Surface Type Existing Condition
Affected Value Score
Construction Qualitative assessment of

Affeted Length x Exposure Score Sum of exposure materials used Sensitivity the existing condition of
construction cost for proportion of scores divided by (e.g. concrete, Score the distribution/access
per meter affected length 2 (optional) asphalt, gravel, (subject to network (excellent, good,
(optional) (optional) dirt) change) fair, poor/condemned)
210,300 1 1 concrete 1 good

2,000,000 2 3 concrete 1 good
1,000,000 1 1.5 concrete 1 good
300,000 1 2.5 concrete 1 good
1,600,000 2 1.5 concrete 1 good
2,476,330 3 3.5 concrete 1 good
5,845,742 3 2 gravel 3 good
1,510,234 2 3 gravel 3 good
3,888,500 3 3.5 gravel 3 good
17,080,480 3 3.5 concrete 1 good
6,777,430 3 3.5 concrete 1 good
7,920,320 3 3.5 concrete 1 good
706,965 1 2.5 gravel 3 good
173,100 1 2.5 gravel 3 good
465,600 1 2.5 gravel 3 good
3,767,400 3 2 gravel 3 good
2,305,900 3 2 gravel 3 good
34,200 1 2 gravel 3 good
664,240 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
4,331,000 3 3.5 gravel 3 good
13,586,240 3 2 gravel 3 good
7,350,400 3 2 gravel 3 good
1,296,900 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
1,735,100 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
1,322,400 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
30,054,560 3 2.5 concrete 1 good
18,390,080 3 2.5 concrete 1 good
1,439,200 2 1.5 concrete 1 good
10,481,760 3 2.5 concrete 1 good
8,481,931 3 2.5 gravel 3 good
10,747,273 3 2.5 gravel 3 good
1,390,796 2 1.5 concrete 1 good
1,087,151 2 1.5 concrete 1 good
13,977,877 3 2.5 gravel 3 good
3,933,255 3 2 gravel 3 good
2,006,427 3 2 gravel 3 good
1,175,040 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
3,472,801 3 2 gravel 3 good
1,121,244 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
1,128,834 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
897,625 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
357,782 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
787,297 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
267,672 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
641,264 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
2,308,939 3 3.5 gravel 3 good
1,285,522 2 2.5 gravel 3 good
LOODING AND RISK ASSESSMENT
VULNERABILITY
sting Condition Year Constructed
Before 1980, Est. percentage

1980-1990, 1990- covered by
Sensitivity 2000, 2000 and Sensitivity Yes or No Sensitivity infrastructure- Adaptive
Score above (year Score Score related Capacity Score
ranges can be measures
adjusted)
2 2000 1 no 4 14.00% 3
2 2000 1 no 4 12.00% 3
2 2000 1 no 4 13.00% 3
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1992 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1994 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2004 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2004 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2004 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2004 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2010 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1986 3 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1986 3 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2003 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1986 3 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1986 3 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1999 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1999 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1999 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2006 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2006 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2006 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 1993 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1995 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1995 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1993 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1993 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2005 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2003 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2003 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
Capacity and willingness to

retrofit
Capacity of
see Scoring tab (A, B, Adaptive property covered Adaptive Capacity investments in CCA- Adaptive Capacity
C, D) Capacity Score by insurance Score DRR (low, moderate, Score
high, very high)
A 1 40.00% 1 moderate 3
B 2 15.00% 3 moderate 3
B 2 15.00% 3 moderate 3
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3

retrofit/ relocate

yet

relocate
Severity of
Government Regulations on Vulnerability Risk Risk
Consequence
hazard mitigation zoning and Score Score Category
Score
Average Severity of
see Scoring tab (A, Adaptive Capacity plus Average plus Vulnerability multiply see Scoring Tab
B, C, D) Score Adaptive Capacity Score divided by 2 to likelihood
D 4 2.20 1.60 8.00 moderate

C 3 2.40 3.20 16.00 high
A 1 2.20 2.10 10.50 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.90 14.50 high
A 1 1.80 1.90 9.50 moderate
A 1 1.80 1.90 9.50 moderate
A 1 1.93 1.46 7.31 moderate
A 1 1.93 1.46 7.31 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.40 12.00 moderate
A 1 1.80 1.40 7.00 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.90 11.60 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.90 8.70 moderate
A 1 2.43 1.71 8.56 moderate
A 1 2.43 3.21 12.85 high
A 1 2.43 3.21 9.64 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.90 14.50 high
B 2 1.90 2.95 14.75 high
B 2 1.90 2.95 5.90 moderate
B 2 2.53 3.26 16.31 high
B 2 2.53 3.26 13.05 high
B 2 2.53 3.26 9.79 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30 moderate
B 2 2.53 2.76 13.81 high
B 2 2.40 2.20 11.00 moderate
B 2 2.40 3.20 12.80 high
B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88 moderate
B 2 2.40 1.70 8.50 moderate
B 2 2.40 1.70 8.50 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 4.91 low
B 2 1.63 1.31 5.25 moderate
B 2 1.63 1.81 7.25 moderate
B 2 1.63 1.81 3.63 low
B 2 1.63 1.81 9.06 moderate
B 2 1.63 1.31 5.25 moderate
B 2 1.63 1.31 2.63 low
B 2 2.00 1.50 9.00 moderate
B 2 2.00 1.50 6.00 moderate
B 2 2.00 2.00 4.00 low
B 2 2.25 2.13 10.63 moderate
B 2 2.25 2.13 8.50 moderate
B 2 1.53 1.26 6.31 moderate
B 2 1.53 1.26 6.31 moderate
B 2 2.28 2.14 10.69 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 6.55 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 6.55 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30 moderate
B 2 2.35 1.68 5.03 moderate
B 2 2.35 1.68 8.38 moderate
B 2 2.73 1.86 5.59 moderate
B 2 2.35 1.68 6.70 moderate
B 2 2.73 1.86 9.31 moderate
B 2 2.73 2.36 9.45 moderate
B 2 2.73 1.86 7.45 moderate
B 2 2.63 1.81 9.06 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.31 9.25 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.31 9.25 moderate
B 2 2.63 1.81 7.25 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.31 6.94 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.81 8.44 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.31 6.94 moderate
B 2 2.63 3.31 9.94 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.81 8.44 moderate
B 2 2.63 1.81 5.44 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.81 5.63 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.81 5.63 moderate

thereof



Barangay Name Hazard

Name of Street
Classification Susceptibility/
(if any)
Intensity


1 Poblacion 2
National High
Barangay High
National High
National Moderate
National Low
Poblacion 6
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
National High
National Moderate
National Low
Bintuan
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Low
Provincial High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Bulalacao
Barangay Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Borac
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Low
Provincial High
Decalachao
Provincial Low
National High
National Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
Provincial Low
National High
San Jose
National Moderate
National High
National Moderate
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
Provincial High
Provincial Low
Provincial Moderate
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Turda
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low

HAZARD EXPOSURE
Likelihood of Expected Affected Length Percentage of

Total Length (m)
Occurrence Score Inundation Depth (m) Affected Length
Thru Anecdotal Affected Length

Depth according to Total length of road Affected length of
Account
hazard map (GIS derived) road (GIS derived) divided by Total
(Score range 1-6) Length
5 >1.5m 327.04 21.03 6.43%

5 >1.5m 200.00 200.00 100.00%
5 >1.5m 500.00 100.00 20.00%
5 >1.5m 50.00 30.00 60.00%
5 >1.5m 180.00 30.00 16.67%
5 >1.5m 400.00 40.01 10.00%
5 >1.5m 1000.00 45.00 4.50%
5 >1.5m 300.00 20.00 6.67%
5 >1.5m 100.00 22.08 22.08%
5 >1.5m 3000.00 100.00 3.33%
4 0.5-1.5m 154.77 154.77 100.00%
3 <0.5m 47.60 47.60 100.00%
5 >1.5m 12000.00 584.57 4.87%
4 0.5-1.5m 151.02 151.02 100.00%
3 <0.5m 388.85 388.85 100.00%
5 >1.5m 1067.53 1067.53 100.00%
5 ≥1m 423.59 423.59 100.00%
2 <0.5m 495.02 495.02 100.00%
5 >1.5m 70.70 70.70 100.00%
4 0.5-1.5m 17.31 17.31 99.98%
3 <0.5m 46.56 46.56 100.00%
5 >1.5m 12000.00 376.74 3.14%
4 0.5-1.5m 12000.00 230.59 1.92%
5 >1.5m 100.00 34.20 34.20%
5 >1.5m 600.00 66.42 11.07%
4 0.5-1.5m 600.00 433.10 72.18%
5 >1.5m 15000.00 849.14 5.66%
5 0.5-1.5m 15000.00 459.40 3.06%
5 >1.5m 5000.00 129.69 2.59%
5 0.5-1.5m 5000.00 173.51 3.47%
5 >1.5m 10000.00 132.24 1.32%
5 0.5-1.5m 10000.00 37.45 0.37%
3 <0.5m 10000.00 9.10 0.09%
4 >1.5m 14000.00 590.94 4.22%
4 0.5-1.5m 14000.00 1878.41 13.42%
2 <0.5m 14000.00 2730.02 19.50%
5 >1.5m 8500.00 1149.38 13.52%
4 0.5-1.5m 8500.00 370.16 4.35%
2 <0.5m 8500.00 33.96 0.40%
6 >1.5m 4700.00 230.37 4.90%
4 0.5-1.5m 4700.00 89.95 1.91%
2 <0.5m 4700.00 655.11 13.94%
5 >1.5m 5959.00 848.19 14.23%
4 <0.5m 5959.00 1074.73 18.04%
5 >1.5m 8256.28 86.92 1.05%
5 0.5-1.5m 8256.28 67.95 0.82%
5 >1.5m 5130.67 873.62 17.03%
4 0.5-1.5m 5130.67 245.83 4.79%
5 >1.5m 1574.57 71.11 4.52%
5 >1.5m 925.90 30.20 3.26%
4 0.5-1.5m 925.90 53.98 5.83%
4 0.5-1.5m 5449.14 200.64 3.68%
4 0.5-1.5m 5673.01 92.04 1.62%
3 <0.5m 5449.14 117.50 2.16%
5 >1.5m 4400.53 217.05 4.93%
3 <0.5m 4400.53 70.08 1.59%
4 0.5-1.5m 4400.53 70.55 1.60%
5 >1.5m 343.90 26.53 7.71%
4 >1.5m 454.01 89.76 19.77%
4 >1.5m 587.07 43.57 7.42%
5 >1.5m 305.54 18.35 6.01%
4 0.5-1.5m 343.90 35.78 10.40%
4 0.5-1.5m 454.01 78.73 17.34%
4 0.5-1.5m 587.07 42.67 7.27%
3 0.5-1.5m 208.69 26.77 12.83%
3 0.5-1.5m 171.63 67.56 39.36%
3 <0.5m 350.66 64.13 18.29%
3 <0.5m 437.48 230.89 52.78%
3 <0.5m 247.66 73.19 29.55%
3 <0.5m 305.54 7.62 2.49%
2 <0.5m 85.93 18.06 21.02%
2 <0.5m 437.48 128.55 29.38%
ROADS EXPOSURE TO FLOODIN
EXPOSURE
Exposure Score Replacement/ Exposure Average

for Affected Construction Affected Value Score for Exposure Surface Type
Length Cost Affected Value Score
Construction
Exposure Score for Construction Cost Affeted Length x Exposure Score Sum of exposure materials used Sensitivity
proportion of per meter construction cost for proportion of scores divided by (e.g. concrete, Score
affected length (optional) per meter affected length 2 (optional) asphalt, gravel, (subject to
(optional) (optional) dirt) change)
1 10,000 210,300 1 1 concrete 1

4 10,000 2,000,000 2 3 concrete 1
2 10,000 1,000,000 1 1.5 concrete 1
4 10,000 300,000 1 2.5 concrete 1
2 10,000 300,000 1 1.5 concrete 1
2 10,000 400,100 1 1.5 concrete 1
1 16,000 720,000 1 1 concrete 1
1 10,000 200,000 1 1 concrete 1
3 10,000 220,765 1 2 concrete 1
1 16,000 1,600,000 2 1.5 concrete 1
4 16,000 2,476,330 3 3.5 concrete 1
4 16,000 761,628 1 2.5 concrete 1
1 10,000 5,845,742 3 2 gravel 3
4 10,000 1,510,234 2 3 gravel 3
4 10,000 3,888,500 3 3.5 gravel 3
4 16,000 17,080,480 3 3.5 concrete 1
4 16,000 6,777,430 3 3.5 concrete 1
4 16,000 7,920,320 3 3.5 concrete 1
4 10,000 706,965 1 2.5 gravel 3
4 10,000 173,100 1 2.5 gravel 3
4 10,000 465,600 1 2.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 3,767,400 3 2 gravel 3
1 10,000 2,305,900 3 2 gravel 3
3 1,000 34,200 1 2 gravel 3
2 10,000 664,240 1 1.5 gravel 3
4 10,000 4,331,000 3 3.5 gravel 3
1 16,000 13,586,240 3 2 gravel 3
1 16,000 7,350,400 3 2 gravel 3
1 10,000 1,296,900 2 1.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 1,735,100 2 1.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 1,322,400 2 1.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 374,500 1 1 gravel 3
1 10,000 91,000 1 1 gravel 3
1 16,000 9,455,040 3 2 concrete 1
2 16,000 30,054,560 3 2.5 concrete 1
2 16,000 43,680,320 4 3 concrete 1
2 16,000 18,390,080 3 2.5 concrete 1
1 16,000 5,922,560 3 2 concrete 1
1 16,000 543,360 1 1 concrete 1
1 16,000 3,685,920 3 2 concrete 1
1 16,000 1,439,200 2 1.5 concrete 1
2 16,000 10,481,760 3 2.5 concrete 1
2 10,000 8,481,931 3 2.5 gravel 3
2 10,000 10,747,273 3 2.5 gravel 3
1 16,000 1,390,796 2 1.5 concrete 1
1 16,000 1,087,151 2 1.5 concrete 1
2 16,000 13,977,877 3 2.5 gravel 3
1 16,000 3,933,255 3 2 gravel 3
1 10,000 711,110 1 1 gravel 3
1 10,000 301,958 1 1 gravel 3
1 10,000 539,765 1 1 gravel 3
1 10,000 2,006,427 3 2 gravel 3
1 10,000 920,365 1 1 gravel 3
1 10,000 1,175,040 2 1.5 gravel 3
1 16,000 3,472,801 3 2 gravel 3
1 16,000 1,121,244 2 1.5 gravel 3
1 16,000 1,128,834 2 1.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 265,279 1 1 gravel 3
2 10,000 897,625 1 1.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 435,667 1 1 gravel 3
1 10,000 183,477 1 1 gravel 3
2 10,000 357,782 1 1.5 gravel 3
2 10,000 787,297 1 1.5 gravel 3
1 10,000 426,735 1 1 gravel 3
2 10,000 267,672 1 1.5 gravel 3
3 10,000 675,612 1 2 gravel 3
2 10,000 641,264 1 1.5 gravel 3
4 10,000 2,308,939 3 3.5 gravel 3
3 10,000 731,897 1 2 gravel 3
1 10,000 76,165 1 1 gravel 3
3 10,000 180,587 1 2 gravel 3
3 10,000 1,285,522 2 2.5 gravel 3
SURE TO FLOODING AND RISK ASSESSMENT
VULNERABILITY
Existing Condition Year Constructed
Qualitative assessment of Before 1980, Est. percentage

the existing condition of 1980-1990, 1990- covered by
the distribution/access Sensitivity 2000, 2000 and Sensitivity Yes or No Sensitivity infrastructure-
network (excellent, good, Score above (year Score Score related
fair, poor/condemned) ranges can be measures
adjusted)
good 2 2000 1 no 4 14.00%

good 2 2000 1 no 4 12.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 13.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1992 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1994 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2004 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2004 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2004 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2004 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2010 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2015 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1980 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1986 3 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1986 3 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2003 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1986 3 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1986 3 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1999 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1999 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1999 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2006 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2006 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2006 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00%
good 2 1993 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1995 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1995 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1993 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1993 2 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2005 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2000 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2003 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 100.00%
good 2 2003 1 no 4 100.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
good 2 1976 4 no 4 50.00%
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
with no access/area Capacity and willingness to
overage to infrastructure retrofit
ated mitigation measures
Capacity of
Adaptive see Scoring tab (A, B, Adaptive property covered Adaptive Capacity investments in CCA-
Capacity Score C, D) Capacity Score by insurance Score DRR (low, moderate,
high, very high)
3 A 1 40.00% 1 moderate
3 B 2 15.00% 3 moderate
3 B 2 15.00% 3 moderate
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 100.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 50.00% 1 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 low
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 A 1 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 30.00% 2 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate
1 C 3 75.00% 1 moderate

retrofit/ relocate

yet

relocate
Severity of
Government Regulations on Vulnerability Risk
Consequence
overnment Investments hazard mitigation zoning and Score Score
Score
Average Severity of
Adaptive Capacity see Scoring tab (A, Adaptive Capacity plus Average plus Vulnerability multiply
Score B, C, D) Score Adaptive Capacity Score divided by 2 to likelihood
3 D 4 2.20 1.60 8.00

3 C 3 2.40 3.20 16.00
3 A 1 2.20 2.10 10.50
4 A 1 1.80 2.90 14.50
4 A 1 1.80 1.90 9.50
4 A 1 1.80 1.90 9.50
4 A 1 1.93 1.46 7.31
4 A 1 1.93 1.46 7.31
4 A 1 1.80 2.40 12.00
4 A 1 1.80 1.40 7.00
4 A 1 1.80 2.90 11.60
4 A 1 1.80 2.90 8.70
4 A 1 2.43 1.71 8.56
4 A 1 2.43 3.21 12.85
4 A 1 2.43 3.21 9.64
4 A 1 1.80 2.90 14.50
4 B 2 1.90 2.95 14.75
4 B 2 1.90 2.95 5.90
4 B 2 2.53 3.26 16.31
4 B 2 2.53 3.26 13.05
4 B 2 2.53 3.26 9.79
4 B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88
4 B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30
4 B 2 2.53 2.76 13.81
4 B 2 2.40 2.20 11.00
4 B 2 2.40 3.20 12.80
4 B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88
4 B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88
4 B 2 2.40 1.70 8.50
4 B 2 2.40 1.70 8.50
4 B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19
4 B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19
4 B 2 2.28 1.64 4.91
4 B 2 1.63 1.31 5.25
4 B 2 1.63 1.81 7.25
4 B 2 1.63 1.81 3.63
4 B 2 1.63 1.81 9.06
4 B 2 1.63 1.31 5.25
4 B 2 1.63 1.31 2.63
4 B 2 2.00 1.50 9.00
4 B 2 2.00 1.50 6.00
4 B 2 2.00 2.00 4.00
4 B 2 2.25 2.13 10.63
4 B 2 2.25 2.13 8.50
3 B 2 1.53 1.26 6.31
3 B 2 1.53 1.26 6.31
3 B 2 2.28 2.14 10.69
3 B 2 2.28 1.64 6.55
3 B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19
3 B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19
3 B 2 2.28 1.64 6.55
3 B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30
3 B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30
3 B 2 2.35 1.68 5.03
3 B 2 2.35 1.68 8.38
3 B 2 2.73 1.86 5.59
3 B 2 2.35 1.68 6.70
3 B 2 2.73 1.86 9.31
3 B 2 2.73 2.36 9.45
3 B 2 2.73 1.86 7.45
3 B 2 2.63 1.81 9.06
3 B 2 2.63 2.31 9.25
3 B 2 2.63 2.31 9.25
3 B 2 2.63 1.81 7.25
3 B 2 2.63 2.31 6.94
3 B 2 2.63 2.81 8.44
3 B 2 2.63 2.31 6.94
3 B 2 2.63 3.31 9.94
3 B 2 2.63 2.81 8.44
3 B 2 2.63 1.81 5.44
3 B 2 2.63 2.81 5.63
3 B 2 2.63 2.81 5.63

thereof



Risk
Category
see Scoring Tab
moderate
high
moderate
high
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
high
moderate
high
high
moderate
high
high
moderate
moderate
moderate
high
moderate
high
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
low
moderate
moderate
low
moderate
moderate
low
moderate
moderate
low
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate

Name of Street
(if any)
Intensity


1 Poblacion 2
National High
Barangay High
National High
National Moderate
National Low
Poblacion 6
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
National High
National Moderate
National Low
Bintuan
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Low
Provincial High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Bulalacao
Barangay Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Borac
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Low
Provincial High
Decalachao
Provincial Low
National High
National Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
Provincial Low
National High
San Jose
National Moderate
National High
National Moderate
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
Provincial High
Provincial Low
Provincial Moderate
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Turda
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low

HAZARD EXPOSURE

Length Cost

Account
5 327.04 21.03 6.43% 1 10,000

5 200.00 200.00 100.00% 4 10,000
5 500.00 100.00 20.00% 2 10,000
5 50.00 30.00 60.00% 4 10,000
5 180.00 30.00 16.67% 2 10,000
5 400.00 40.01 10.00% 2 10,000
5 1000.00 45.00 4.50% 1 16,000
5 300.00 20.00 6.67% 1 10,000
5 100.00 22.08 22.08% 3 10,000
5 3000.00 100.00 3.33% 1 16,000
4 154.77 154.77 100.00% 4 16,000
3 47.60 47.60 100.00% 4 16,000
5 12000.00 584.57 4.87% 1 10,000
4 151.02 151.02 100.00% 4 10,000
3 388.85 388.85 100.00% 4 10,000
5 1067.53 1067.53 100.00% 4 16,000
5 423.59 423.59 100.00% 4 16,000
2 495.02 495.02 100.00% 4 16,000
5 70.70 70.70 100.00% 4 10,000
4 17.31 17.31 99.98% 4 10,000
3 46.56 46.56 100.00% 4 10,000
5 12000.00 376.74 3.14% 1 10,000
4 12000.00 230.59 1.92% 1 10,000
5 100.00 34.20 34.20% 3 1,000
5 600.00 66.42 11.07% 2 10,000
4 600.00 433.10 72.18% 4 10,000
5 15000.00 849.14 5.66% 1 16,000
5 15000.00 459.40 3.06% 1 16,000
5 5000.00 129.69 2.59% 1 10,000
5 5000.00 173.51 3.47% 1 10,000
5 10000.00 132.24 1.32% 1 10,000
5 10000.00 37.45 0.37% 1 10,000
3 10000.00 9.10 0.09% 1 10,000
4 14000.00 590.94 4.22% 1 16,000
4 14000.00 1878.41 13.42% 2 16,000
2 14000.00 2730.02 19.50% 2 16,000
5 8500.00 1149.38 13.52% 2 16,000
4 8500.00 370.16 4.35% 1 16,000
2 8500.00 33.96 0.40% 1 16,000
6 4700.00 230.37 4.90% 1 16,000
4 4700.00 89.95 1.91% 1 16,000
2 4700.00 655.11 13.94% 2 16,000
5 5959.00 848.19 14.23% 2 10,000
4 5959.00 1074.73 18.04% 2 10,000
5 8256.28 86.92 1.05% 1 16,000
5 8256.28 67.95 0.82% 1 16,000
5 5130.67 873.62 17.03% 2 16,000
4 5130.67 245.83 4.79% 1 16,000
5 1574.57 71.11 4.52% 1 10,000
5 925.90 30.20 3.26% 1 10,000
4 925.90 53.98 5.83% 1 10,000
4 5449.14 200.64 3.68% 1 10,000
4 5673.01 92.04 1.62% 1 10,000
3 5449.14 117.50 2.16% 1 10,000
5 4400.53 217.05 4.93% 1 16,000
3 4400.53 70.08 1.59% 1 16,000
4 4400.53 70.55 1.60% 1 16,000
5 343.90 26.53 7.71% 1 10,000
4 454.01 89.76 19.77% 2 10,000
4 587.07 43.57 7.42% 1 10,000
5 305.54 18.35 6.01% 1 10,000
4 343.90 35.78 10.40% 2 10,000
4 454.01 78.73 17.34% 2 10,000
4 587.07 42.67 7.27% 1 10,000
3 208.69 26.77 12.83% 2 10,000
3 171.63 67.56 39.36% 3 10,000
3 350.66 64.13 18.29% 2 10,000
3 437.48 230.89 52.78% 4 10,000
3 247.66 73.19 29.55% 3 10,000
3 305.54 7.62 2.49% 1 10,000
2 85.93 18.06 21.02% 3 10,000
2 437.48 128.55 29.38% 3 10,000
VULNERABILITY
Exposure Average


1,000,000 1 1.5 concrete 1 good
1,600,000 2 1.5 concrete 1 good
2,476,330 3 3.5 concrete 1 good
5,845,742 3 2 gravel 3 good
1,510,234 2 3 gravel 3 good
3,888,500 3 3.5 gravel 3 good
17,080,480 3 3.5 concrete 1 good
6,777,430 3 3.5 concrete 1 good
7,920,320 3 3.5 concrete 1 good
706,965 1 2.5 gravel 3 good
173,100 1 2.5 gravel 3 good
465,600 1 2.5 gravel 3 good
3,767,400 3 2 gravel 3 good
2,305,900 3 2 gravel 3 good
664,240 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
4,331,000 3 3.5 gravel 3 good
13,586,240 3 2 gravel 3 good
7,350,400 3 2 gravel 3 good
1,296,900 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
1,735,100 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
1,322,400 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
30,054,560 3 2.5 concrete 1 good
18,390,080 3 2.5 concrete 1 good
1,439,200 2 1.5 concrete 1 good
10,481,760 3 2.5 concrete 1 good
8,481,931 3 2.5 gravel 3 good
10,747,273 3 2.5 gravel 3 good
1,390,796 2 1.5 concrete 1 good
1,087,151 2 1.5 concrete 1 good
13,977,877 3 2.5 gravel 3 good
3,933,255 3 2 gravel 3 good
2,006,427 3 2 gravel 3 good
1,175,040 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
3,472,801 3 2 gravel 3 good
1,121,244 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
1,128,834 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
897,625 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
357,782 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
787,297 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
267,672 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
641,264 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
2,308,939 3 3.5 gravel 3 good
1,285,522 2 2.5 gravel 3 good
VULNERABILITY

1980-1990, 1990- covered by
adjusted)
2 2000 1 no 4 14.00% 3
2 2000 1 no 4 12.00% 3
2 2000 1 no 4 13.00% 3
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1992 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1994 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2004 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2004 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2004 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2004 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2010 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1986 3 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1986 3 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2003 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1986 3 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1986 3 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1999 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1999 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1999 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2006 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2006 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2006 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 1993 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1995 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1995 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1993 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1993 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2005 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2003 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2003 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

retrofit
Capacity of
high, very high)
A 1 40.00% 1 moderate 3
B 2 15.00% 3 moderate 3
B 2 15.00% 3 moderate 3
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3

retrofit/ relocate

yet

relocate
Severity of
Consequence
Score
Average Severity of
D 4 2.20 1.60 8.00 moderate

C 3 2.40 3.20 16.00 high
A 1 2.20 2.10 10.50 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.90 14.50 high
A 1 1.80 1.90 9.50 moderate
A 1 1.80 1.90 9.50 moderate
A 1 1.93 1.46 7.31 moderate
A 1 1.93 1.46 7.31 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.40 12.00 moderate
A 1 1.80 1.40 7.00 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.90 11.60 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.90 8.70 moderate
A 1 2.43 1.71 8.56 moderate
A 1 2.43 3.21 12.85 high
A 1 2.43 3.21 9.64 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.90 14.50 high
B 2 1.90 2.95 14.75 high
B 2 1.90 2.95 5.90 moderate
B 2 2.53 3.26 16.31 high
B 2 2.53 3.26 13.05 high
B 2 2.53 3.26 9.79 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30 moderate
B 2 2.53 2.76 13.81 high
B 2 2.40 2.20 11.00 moderate
B 2 2.40 3.20 12.80 high
B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88 moderate
B 2 2.40 1.70 8.50 moderate
B 2 2.40 1.70 8.50 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 4.91 low
B 2 1.63 1.31 5.25 moderate
B 2 1.63 1.81 7.25 moderate
B 2 1.63 1.81 3.63 low
B 2 1.63 1.81 9.06 moderate
B 2 1.63 1.31 5.25 moderate
B 2 1.63 1.31 2.63 low
B 2 2.00 1.50 9.00 moderate
B 2 2.00 1.50 6.00 moderate
B 2 2.00 2.00 4.00 low
B 2 2.25 2.13 10.63 moderate
B 2 2.25 2.13 8.50 moderate
B 2 1.53 1.26 6.31 moderate
B 2 1.53 1.26 6.31 moderate
B 2 2.28 2.14 10.69 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 6.55 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 6.55 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30 moderate
B 2 2.35 1.68 5.03 moderate
B 2 2.35 1.68 8.38 moderate
B 2 2.73 1.86 5.59 moderate
B 2 2.35 1.68 6.70 moderate
B 2 2.73 1.86 9.31 moderate
B 2 2.73 2.36 9.45 moderate
B 2 2.73 1.86 7.45 moderate
B 2 2.63 1.81 9.06 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.31 9.25 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.31 9.25 moderate
B 2 2.63 1.81 7.25 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.31 6.94 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.81 8.44 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.31 6.94 moderate
B 2 2.63 3.31 9.94 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.81 8.44 moderate
B 2 2.63 1.81 5.44 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.81 5.63 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.81 5.63 moderate

thereof




Name of Street
(if any)
Intensity


1 Poblacion 2
National High
Barangay High
National High
National Moderate
National Low
Poblacion 6
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
National High
National Moderate
National Low
Bintuan
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Low
Provincial High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Bulalacao
Barangay Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Borac
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Low
Provincial High
Decalachao
Provincial Low
National High
National Moderate
Provincial High
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
Provincial Low
National High
San Jose
National Moderate
National High
National Moderate
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Provincial Moderate
Provincial Low
Provincial High
Provincial Low
Provincial Moderate
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay High
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Turda
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Moderate
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low
Barangay Low

HAZARD EXPOSURE

Length Cost

Account
5 327.04 21.03 6.43% 1 10,000

5 200.00 200.00 100.00% 4 10,000
5 500.00 100.00 20.00% 2 10,000
5 50.00 30.00 60.00% 4 10,000
5 180.00 30.00 16.67% 2 10,000
5 400.00 40.01 10.00% 2 10,000
5 1000.00 45.00 4.50% 1 16,000
5 300.00 20.00 6.67% 1 10,000
5 100.00 22.08 22.08% 3 10,000
5 3000.00 100.00 3.33% 1 16,000
4 154.77 154.77 100.00% 4 16,000
3 47.60 47.60 100.00% 4 16,000
5 12000.00 584.57 4.87% 1 10,000
4 151.02 151.02 100.00% 4 10,000
3 388.85 388.85 100.00% 4 10,000
5 1067.53 1067.53 100.00% 4 16,000
5 423.59 423.59 100.00% 4 16,000
2 495.02 495.02 100.00% 4 16,000
5 70.70 70.70 100.00% 4 10,000
4 17.31 17.31 99.98% 4 10,000
3 46.56 46.56 100.00% 4 10,000
5 12000.00 376.74 3.14% 1 10,000
4 12000.00 230.59 1.92% 1 10,000
5 100.00 34.20 34.20% 3 1,000
5 600.00 66.42 11.07% 2 10,000
4 600.00 433.10 72.18% 4 10,000
5 15000.00 849.14 5.66% 1 16,000
5 15000.00 459.40 3.06% 1 16,000
5 5000.00 129.69 2.59% 1 10,000
5 5000.00 173.51 3.47% 1 10,000
5 10000.00 132.24 1.32% 1 10,000
5 10000.00 37.45 0.37% 1 10,000
3 10000.00 9.10 0.09% 1 10,000
4 14000.00 590.94 4.22% 1 16,000
4 14000.00 1878.41 13.42% 2 16,000
2 14000.00 2730.02 19.50% 2 16,000
5 8500.00 1149.38 13.52% 2 16,000
4 8500.00 370.16 4.35% 1 16,000
2 8500.00 33.96 0.40% 1 16,000
6 4700.00 230.37 4.90% 1 16,000
4 4700.00 89.95 1.91% 1 16,000
2 4700.00 655.11 13.94% 2 16,000
5 5959.00 848.19 14.23% 2 10,000
4 5959.00 1074.73 18.04% 2 10,000
5 8256.28 86.92 1.05% 1 16,000
5 8256.28 67.95 0.82% 1 16,000
5 5130.67 873.62 17.03% 2 16,000
4 5130.67 245.83 4.79% 1 16,000
5 1574.57 71.11 4.52% 1 10,000
5 925.90 30.20 3.26% 1 10,000
4 925.90 53.98 5.83% 1 10,000
4 5449.14 200.64 3.68% 1 10,000
4 5673.01 92.04 1.62% 1 10,000
3 5449.14 117.50 2.16% 1 10,000
5 4400.53 217.05 4.93% 1 16,000
3 4400.53 70.08 1.59% 1 16,000
4 4400.53 70.55 1.60% 1 16,000
5 343.90 26.53 7.71% 1 10,000
4 454.01 89.76 19.77% 2 10,000
4 587.07 43.57 7.42% 1 10,000
5 305.54 18.35 6.01% 1 10,000
4 343.90 35.78 10.40% 2 10,000
4 454.01 78.73 17.34% 2 10,000
4 587.07 42.67 7.27% 1 10,000
3 208.69 26.77 12.83% 2 10,000
3 171.63 67.56 39.36% 3 10,000
3 350.66 64.13 18.29% 2 10,000
3 437.48 230.89 52.78% 4 10,000
3 247.66 73.19 29.55% 3 10,000
3 305.54 7.62 2.49% 1 10,000
2 85.93 18.06 21.02% 3 10,000
2 437.48 128.55 29.38% 3 10,000
VULNERABILITY
Exposure Average


1,000,000 1 1.5 concrete 1 good
1,600,000 2 1.5 concrete 1 good
2,476,330 3 3.5 concrete 1 good
5,845,742 3 2 gravel 3 good
1,510,234 2 3 gravel 3 good
3,888,500 3 3.5 gravel 3 good
17,080,480 3 3.5 concrete 1 good
6,777,430 3 3.5 concrete 1 good
7,920,320 3 3.5 concrete 1 good
706,965 1 2.5 gravel 3 good
173,100 1 2.5 gravel 3 good
465,600 1 2.5 gravel 3 good
3,767,400 3 2 gravel 3 good
2,305,900 3 2 gravel 3 good
664,240 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
4,331,000 3 3.5 gravel 3 good
13,586,240 3 2 gravel 3 good
7,350,400 3 2 gravel 3 good
1,296,900 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
1,735,100 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
1,322,400 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
30,054,560 3 2.5 concrete 1 good
18,390,080 3 2.5 concrete 1 good
1,439,200 2 1.5 concrete 1 good
10,481,760 3 2.5 concrete 1 good
8,481,931 3 2.5 gravel 3 good
10,747,273 3 2.5 gravel 3 good
1,390,796 2 1.5 concrete 1 good
1,087,151 2 1.5 concrete 1 good
13,977,877 3 2.5 gravel 3 good
3,933,255 3 2 gravel 3 good
2,006,427 3 2 gravel 3 good
1,175,040 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
3,472,801 3 2 gravel 3 good
1,121,244 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
1,128,834 2 1.5 gravel 3 good
897,625 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
357,782 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
787,297 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
267,672 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
641,264 1 1.5 gravel 3 good
2,308,939 3 3.5 gravel 3 good
1,285,522 2 2.5 gravel 3 good
VULNERABILITY

1980-1990, 1990- covered by
adjusted)
2 2000 1 no 4 14.00% 3
2 2000 1 no 4 12.00% 3
2 2000 1 no 4 13.00% 3
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1992 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1994 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2004 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2004 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2004 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2004 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2010 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1980 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1986 3 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1986 3 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2003 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1986 3 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1986 3 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1999 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1999 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1999 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2013 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2006 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2006 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2006 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 2015 1 yes 1 100.00% 1
2 1993 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1995 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1995 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1993 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1993 2 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2005 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2000 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2003 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 100.00% 1
2 2003 1 no 4 100.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
2 1976 4 no 4 50.00% 1
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

retrofit
Capacity of
high, very high)
A 1 40.00% 1 moderate 3
B 2 15.00% 3 moderate 3
B 2 15.00% 3 moderate 3
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 100.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 50.00% 1 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 low 4
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
A 1 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 30.00% 2 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3
C 3 75.00% 1 moderate 3

retrofit/ relocate

yet

relocate
Severity of
Consequence
Score
Average Severity of
D 4 2.20 1.60 8.00 moderate

C 3 2.40 3.20 16.00 high
A 1 2.20 2.10 10.50 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.90 14.50 high
A 1 1.80 1.90 9.50 moderate
A 1 1.80 1.90 9.50 moderate
A 1 1.93 1.46 7.31 moderate
A 1 1.93 1.46 7.31 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.40 12.00 moderate
A 1 1.80 1.40 7.00 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.90 11.60 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.90 8.70 moderate
A 1 2.43 1.71 8.56 moderate
A 1 2.43 3.21 12.85 high
A 1 2.43 3.21 9.64 moderate
A 1 1.80 2.90 14.50 high
B 2 1.90 2.95 14.75 high
B 2 1.90 2.95 5.90 moderate
B 2 2.53 3.26 16.31 high
B 2 2.53 3.26 13.05 high
B 2 2.53 3.26 9.79 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30 moderate
B 2 2.53 2.76 13.81 high
B 2 2.40 2.20 11.00 moderate
B 2 2.40 3.20 12.80 high
B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 7.88 moderate
B 2 2.40 1.70 8.50 moderate
B 2 2.40 1.70 8.50 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 4.91 low
B 2 1.63 1.31 5.25 moderate
B 2 1.63 1.81 7.25 moderate
B 2 1.63 1.81 3.63 low
B 2 1.63 1.81 9.06 moderate
B 2 1.63 1.31 5.25 moderate
B 2 1.63 1.31 2.63 low
B 2 2.00 1.50 9.00 moderate
B 2 2.00 1.50 6.00 moderate
B 2 2.00 2.00 4.00 low
B 2 2.25 2.13 10.63 moderate
B 2 2.25 2.13 8.50 moderate
B 2 1.53 1.26 6.31 moderate
B 2 1.53 1.26 6.31 moderate
B 2 2.28 2.14 10.69 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 6.55 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
B 2 2.28 1.64 6.55 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30 moderate
B 2 2.15 1.58 6.30 moderate
B 2 2.35 1.68 5.03 moderate
B 2 2.35 1.68 8.38 moderate
B 2 2.73 1.86 5.59 moderate
B 2 2.35 1.68 6.70 moderate
B 2 2.73 1.86 9.31 moderate
B 2 2.73 2.36 9.45 moderate
B 2 2.73 1.86 7.45 moderate
B 2 2.63 1.81 9.06 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.31 9.25 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.31 9.25 moderate
B 2 2.63 1.81 7.25 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.31 6.94 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.81 8.44 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.31 6.94 moderate
B 2 2.63 3.31 9.94 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.81 8.44 moderate
B 2 2.63 1.81 5.44 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.81 5.63 moderate
B 2 2.63 2.81 5.63 moderate

thereof



IDENTIFICATION
Barangay Name Name of Street Likelihood of

Classification
(if any) Occurrence Score
Thru Anecdotal
National, Provincial, Account
Municipal or Barangay (Score range 1-6)
Municipal Road Rizal 5

1 Poblacion 2
Municipal Road Malvar 5
Municipal Road Don Pedro 5
2 Poblacion 3 Municipal Road Lopez St. 5
Municipal Road Fababeir St. 5
3 Poblacion 5 Municipal Road Luis Lim St. 5
National 5
Poblacion 1 Municipal 5
Barangay 5
National 5
Poblacion 6
Provincial 5
National 5
Bintuan
Barangay 3
Provincial 5
Buenavista
Barangay 5
Barangay 5
Bulalacao
Barangay 4
Provincial 5
Borac
Barangay 5
Provincial 5
Decabobo Provincial 5
Provincial 3
Provincial 4
Decalachao Provincial 4
Provincial 2
National 5
National 4
Guadalupe National 2
Provincial 6
Provincial 4
Provincial 2
Marcilla Provincial 5
Provincial 4
National 5
San Jose
National 5
National 5
National 4
San Nicolas Municipal 5
Barangay 5
Barangay 4
Provincial 4
Tagumpay Provincial 4
Provincial 3
Provincial 5
Provincial 3
Barangay 3
Turda
Barangay 3
Barangay 2
Barangay 2

EXPOSURE

Affected Length Percentage of
Total Length (m) for Affected Construction Affected Value
(m) Affected Length
Length Cost
Affected Length Exposure Score for Construction Cost Affeted Length x

Total length of road Affected length of construction cost
per meter
Length affected length (optional)
(optional)
327.04 21.03 6.43% 1 10,000 210,300

200.00 200.00 100.00% 4 10,000 2,000,000
500.00 100.00 20.00% 2 10,000 1,000,000
50.00 30.00 60.00% 4 10,000 300,000
180.00 30.00 16.67% 2 10,000 300,000
400.00 40.01 10.00% 2 10,000 400,100
1000.00 45.00 4.50% 1 16,000 720,000
300.00 20.00 6.67% 1 10,000 200,000
100.00 22.08 22.08% 3 10,000 220,765
3000.00 100.00 3.33% 1 16,000 1,600,000
12000.00 584.57 4.87% 1 10,000 5,845,742
1067.53 1067.53 100.00% 4 16,000 17,080,480
46.56 46.56 100.00% 4 10,000 465,600
12000.00 376.74 3.14% 1 10,000 3,767,400
100.00 34.20 34.20% 3 1,000 34,200
600.00 66.42 11.07% 2 10,000 664,240
600.00 433.10 72.18% 4 10,000 4,331,000
15000.00 849.14 5.66% 1 16,000 13,586,240
5000.00 173.51 3.47% 1 10,000 1,735,100
10000.00 132.24 1.32% 1 10,000 1,322,400
10000.00 37.45 0.37% 1 10,000 374,500
10000.00 9.10 0.09% 1 10,000 91,000
14000.00 590.94 4.22% 1 16,000 9,455,040
14000.00 1878.41 13.42% 2 16,000 30,054,560
14000.00 2730.02 19.50% 2 16,000 43,680,320
8500.00 1149.38 13.52% 2 16,000 18,390,080
8500.00 370.16 4.35% 1 16,000 5,922,560
8500.00 33.96 0.40% 1 16,000 543,360
4700.00 230.37 4.90% 1 16,000 3,685,920
4700.00 89.95 1.91% 1 16,000 1,439,200
4700.00 655.11 13.94% 2 16,000 10,481,760
5959.00 848.19 14.23% 2 10,000 8,481,931
5959.00 1074.73 18.04% 2 10,000 10,747,273
8256.28 86.92 1.05% 1 16,000 1,390,796
8256.28 67.95 0.82% 1 16,000 1,087,151
5130.67 873.62 17.03% 2 16,000 13,977,877
5130.67 245.83 4.79% 1 16,000 3,933,255
1574.57 71.11 4.52% 1 10,000 711,110
925.90 30.20 3.26% 1 10,000 301,958
925.90 53.98 5.83% 1 10,000 539,765
5449.14 200.64 3.68% 1 10,000 2,006,427
5673.01 92.04 1.62% 1 10,000 920,365
5449.14 117.50 2.16% 1 10,000 1,175,040
4400.53 217.05 4.93% 1 16,000 3,472,801
4400.53 70.08 1.59% 1 16,000 1,121,244
247.66 73.19 29.55% 3 10,000 731,897
305.54 7.62 2.49% 1 10,000 76,165
85.93 18.06 21.02% 3 10,000 180,587
437.48 128.55 29.38% 3 10,000 1,285,522
ROADS EXPOSURE TO FLOODING AND RISK ASSESSMEN
VULNERABILITY
Exposure Average
Score for Exposure Surface Type Existing Condition Year Constructed
Construction Qualitative assessment of Before 1980,

Exposure Score Sum of exposure materials used Sensitivity the existing condition of 1980-1990, 1990-
for proportion of scores divided by (e.g. concrete, Score the distribution/access Sensitivity 2000, 2000 and
affected length 2 (optional) asphalt, gravel, (subject to network (excellent, good, Score above (year
(optional) dirt) change) fair, poor/condemned) ranges can be
adjusted)
1 1 concrete 1 good 2 2000

1 1.5 concrete 1 good 2 2000
3 2 gravel 3 good 2 1980
1 2.5 gravel 3 good 2 1980
1 1.5 gravel 3 good 2 1986
3 3.5 gravel 3 good 2 1986
2 1.5 gravel 3 good 2 1986
2 1.5 gravel 3 good 2 1999
3 2.5 gravel 3 good 2 2000
3 2.5 gravel 3 good 2 2000
3 2.5 gravel 3 good 2 1993
2 1.5 gravel 3 good 2 2000
2 1.5 gravel 3 good 2 1976
2 2.5 gravel 3 good 2 1976
D RISK ASSESSMENT
Y ADAPTIVE C
Employing Resilient with no access/area Capacity and willingness to
Year Constructed
Design coverage to infrastructure retrofit
Est. percentage
covered by
Sensitivity Yes or No Sensitivity infrastructure- Adaptive see Scoring tab (A, B, Adaptive
Score Score related Capacity Score C, D) Capacity Score
measures
1 no 4 14.00% 3 A 1
1 no 4 12.00% 3 B 2
1 no 4 13.00% 3 B 2
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
2 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
2 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
4 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
4 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
4 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
3 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
3 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
3 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
2 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
2 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
2 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 yes 1 100.00% 1 A 1
1 yes 1 100.00% 1 A 1
1 yes 1 100.00% 1 A 1
1 yes 1 100.00% 1 A 1
1 yes 1 100.00% 1 A 1
1 yes 1 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 yes 1 100.00% 1 A 1
1 yes 1 100.00% 1 A 1
2 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
2 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
2 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
2 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
2 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 A 1
1 no 4 100.00% 1 C 3
1 no 4 100.00% 1 C 3
4 no 4 100.00% 1 C 3
4 no 4 50.00% 1 C 3
4 no 4 50.00% 1 C 3
4 no 4 50.00% 1 C 3
4 no 4 50.00% 1 C 3
4
4
4
4
4 (A) - The owner or concerned
4 capacity and willingness to
4 retrofit/ relocate
4
4 (B) - The owner or concerned
4 to retrofit/ relocate but no plan
4 yet
4
4
4 administrator has capacity to
4 retrofit/ relocate but not willing
4
4
relocate
4
4
4
4
4
4
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
Government Regulations on
Insurance Coverage Government Investments hazard mitigation zoning and
Capacity of
property covered Adaptive Capacity investments in CCA- Adaptive Capacity see Scoring tab (A, Adaptive Capacity
by insurance Score DRR (low, moderate, Score B, C, D) Score
high, very high)
40.00% 1 moderate 3 D 4
15.00% 3 moderate 3 C 3
15.00% 3 moderate 3 A 1
100.00% 1 low 4 A 1
100.00% 1 low 4 A 1
100.00% 1 low 4 A 1
100.00% 1 low 4 A 1
100.00% 1 low 4 A 1
100.00% 1 low 4 A 1
100.00% 1 low 4 A 1
100.00% 1 low 4 A 1
50.00% 1 low 4 A 1
50.00% 1 low 4 B 2
50.00% 1 low 4 B 2
50.00% 1 low 4 B 2
50.00% 1 low 4 B 2
50.00% 1 low 4 B 2
50.00% 1 low 4 B 2
50.00% 1 low 4 B 2
50.00% 1 low 4 B 2
50.00% 1 low 4 B 2
50.00% 1 low 4 B 2
30.00% 2 low 4 B 2
30.00% 2 low 4 B 2
30.00% 2 low 4 B 2
30.00% 2 low 4 B 2
30.00% 2 low 4 B 2
30.00% 2 low 4 B 2
30.00% 2 low 4 B 2
30.00% 2 low 4 B 2
30.00% 2 low 4 B 2
30.00% 2 low 4 B 2
30.00% 2 low 4 B 2
30.00% 2 moderate 3 B 2
30.00% 2 moderate 3 B 2
30.00% 2 moderate 3 B 2
30.00% 2 moderate 3 B 2
30.00% 2 moderate 3 B 2
30.00% 2 moderate 3 B 2
30.00% 2 moderate 3 B 2
30.00% 2 moderate 3 B 2
30.00% 2 moderate 3 B 2
30.00% 2 moderate 3 B 2
30.00% 2 moderate 3 B 2
30.00% 2 moderate 3 B 2
75.00% 1 moderate 3 B 2
75.00% 1 moderate 3 B 2
75.00% 1 moderate 3 B 2
75.00% 1 moderate 3 B 2
4
4
4
4 (A) - Local government is
4 implementing existing
4 regulations on hazard
4 and monitors compliance
4 thereof
4
4 (B) - Local government is
4 mitigation and structural design
4
4 existing regulations on hazard
4
4
4
4
4
4
Severity of
Vulnerability Risk Risk
Consequence
Score Score Category
Score
Average Severity of
plus Average plus Vulnerability multiply see Scoring Tab
Adaptive Capacity Score divided by 2 to likelihood
2.20 1.60 8.00 moderate

2.40 3.20 16.00 high
2.20 2.10 10.50 moderate
1.80 2.90 14.50 high
1.80 1.90 9.50 moderate
1.80 1.90 9.50 moderate
1.93 1.46 7.31 moderate
1.93 1.46 7.31 moderate
1.80 2.40 12.00 moderate
1.80 1.40 7.00 moderate
2.43 1.71 8.56 moderate
1.80 2.90 14.50 high
2.53 3.26 9.79 moderate
2.15 1.58 7.88 moderate
2.53 2.76 13.81 high
2.40 2.20 11.00 moderate
2.40 3.20 12.80 high
2.15 1.58 7.88 moderate
2.40 1.70 8.50 moderate
2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
2.28 1.64 4.91 low
1.63 1.31 5.25 moderate
1.63 1.81 7.25 moderate
1.63 1.81 3.63 low
1.63 1.81 9.06 moderate
1.63 1.31 5.25 moderate
1.63 1.31 2.63 low
2.00 1.50 9.00 moderate
2.00 1.50 6.00 moderate
2.00 2.00 4.00 low
2.25 2.13 10.63 moderate
2.25 2.13 8.50 moderate
1.53 1.26 6.31 moderate
1.53 1.26 6.31 moderate
2.28 2.14 10.69 moderate
2.28 1.64 6.55 moderate
2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
2.28 1.64 8.19 moderate
2.28 1.64 6.55 moderate
2.15 1.58 6.30 moderate
2.15 1.58 6.30 moderate
2.35 1.68 5.03 moderate
2.35 1.68 8.38 moderate
2.73 1.86 5.59 moderate
2.63 2.81 8.44 moderate
2.63 1.81 5.44 moderate
2.63 2.81 5.63 moderate
2.63 2.81 5.63 moderate
HAZARD
Barangay Name
Flood Likelihood of Expected Flood
Susceptibility Occurrence Score Depth
low, moderate, ≤1m for moderate and

refer to LO Table Low
high ≤1m for high
ELECTRICAL POST EXPOSURE TO
EXPOSURE
Number of EP Affected
Total Number % of EP Affected by
of EP by Hazard Hazard % with transformer
CAL POST EXPOSURE TO FLOODING AND RISK ASSESSMENT
VULNERABILITY
Classification by Construction
Unit Cost Replacement Cost Materials Existing Condition
Unit Cost multiply by wood, metal, concrete good, critical, poor,

affected number of EP excellent
VULNERABILITY
Employing Hazard Resistant % protected by

Year Constructed Design infrastructure related
mitigation measures
1970s, 1980s, 1990s, or yes or no see notes below

2000 onwards
≥20% of affected posts are

protected by infrastructure-related
mitigation measures
(i.e. sea walls, flood
control measures) (A)
>10 - <20% of affected posts are

protected by infrastructure-
related
mitigation measures
(i.e. sea walls, flod control
measures) (B)
>5%-10% of affected posts are

protected
by infrastructure-related
mitigation
measures (i.e. sea walls, flood
control measures) (C)
≤ 5% of affected posts are

protected by
infrastructure-related mitigation
control measures) (D)
Severity of Risk Risk
Consequence Score Category
HAZARD
Barangay Name
Landslide Likelihood of Total Number
Susceptibility Occurrence Score of EP
low, moderate,
refer to LO Table
high
ELECTRICAL POST EXPOSURE TO LANDSLIDE A
EXPOSURE
% of EP Affected by
by Hazard Hazard % with transformer Unit Cost
OST EXPOSURE TO LANDSLIDE AND RISK ASSESSMENT
VULNERABILITY
Replacement Cost Materials Existing Condition

VULNERABILITY

mitigation measures

2000 onwards

mitigation measures

related
mitigation measures
measures) (B)

protected
mitigation

protected by
HAZARD EXPOSURE
Barangay Name
Likelihood of Total Number
Occurrence Score of EP
refer to LO Table
ELECTRICAL POST EXPOSURE TO TSU
EXPOSURE
% of EP Affected by
by Hazard Hazard % with transformer Unit Cost
TRICAL POST EXPOSURE TO TSUNAMI AND RISK ASSESSMENT
VULNERABILITY
Replacement Cost Materials Existing Condition

VULNERABILITY

mitigation measures

2000 onwards

mitigation measures

related
mitigation measures
measures) (B)

protected
mitigation

protected by

Data Base Lifeline Exposureto Hazard

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Data Base Lifeline Exposureto Hazard

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

% Score % Score

H Hazard/Likelihood Score Risk = HEV, where V = S/Ac

Indicative Likelihood of Occurrence Scores

Severity of Consequence Score (EV)

Scoring for Capacity and willingness to retrofit/relocate Adaptive Capacity Indicator

(A) - The owner or concerned

(B) - The owner or concerned administrator

(C) - The owner or concerned administrator

4 (D) - No capacity to retrofit/ relocate

(B) - Local government is implementing

(C) - Local government has existing

(D) - Local government has no regulations

Note: Road Construction cost: Mun & Bry- 1m/100meters

Barangay Name Name of Street Flood

National, Provincial, Low, Moderate, High

Municipal Road Rizal High

Note: Road Construction cost: Mun & Bry- 1m/100meters

Likelihood of Expected Flood Affected Length Percentage of

Thru Anecdotal ≤1m for moderate and Affected Length

5 ≥1m 327.04 21.03 6.43%

Exposure Score Replacement/ Exposure Average

1 10,000 210,300 1 1 concrete 1

Qualitative assessment of Before 1980, Est. percentage

good 2 2000 1 no 4 14.00%

(A) - The owner or concerned

(B) - The owner or concerned

(D) - No capacity to retrofit/

3 D 4 2.20 1.60 8.00

(A) - Local government is

(B) - Local government is

(C) - Local government has

(D) - Local government has no

see Scoring Tab

Barangay Name Name of Street Landslide

National, Provincial, Low, Moderate, High

Municipal Road Rizal High

Note: Road Construction cost: Mun & Bry- 1m/100meters

Exposure Score Replacement/

Thru Anecdotal Affected Length Exposure Score for Construction Cost

5 327.04 21.03 6.43% 1 10,000

Construction Qualitative assessment of

210,300 1 1 concrete 1 good

Before 1980, Est. percentage

Capacity and willingness to

(A) - The owner or concerned

(B) - The owner or concerned

(D) - No capacity to retrofit/

D 4 2.20 1.60 8.00 moderate

(A) - Local government is

(B) - Local government is

(C) - Local government has

(D) - Local government has no

Barangay Name Hazard

National, Provincial, Low, Moderate, High

Municipal Road Rizal High

Note: Road Construction cost: Mun & Bry- 1m/100meters

Likelihood of Expected Affected Length Percentage of

Thru Anecdotal Affected Length

5 >1.5m 327.04 21.03 6.43%

Exposure Score Replacement/ Exposure Average

1 10,000 210,300 1 1 concrete 1

Qualitative assessment of Before 1980, Est. percentage

good 2 2000 1 no 4 14.00%