You are on page 1of 95

CE 3104

Structural Theory

Lecture 2:
Analysis of Statically
Determinate Structures

Engr. Abbey Dale Abellanosa, MSc


Department of Civil Engineering

CE 3104 – Structural Theory September 9–16, 2020


Lecture Outline
Analysis of Beams
Internal Forces → Sign Convention → Relations Between Loads, Shear,
and Moment → Shear and Moment Diagrams

Analysis of Frames
Stability and Indeterminacy → External Reactions → Load Transmission
→ Shear and Moment Diagrams

Analysis of Trusses
Internal Stability → Stability and Indeterminacy of Trusses
→ Method of Joints → Method of Sections

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-2
CE 3104 – Structural Theory

Lecture 2.1:
Analysis of Beams

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020


Analysis of Beams
Beams are usually straight members that is loaded
perpendicular to its longitudinal axis. Beams are primarily
designed to resist bending.

𝐵
Longitudinal 𝐴
Axis 𝛼

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-4
Internal Forces
External and Internal Forces in Beams:
𝑤

𝐴 𝐵
𝐵𝑥
𝛼
𝑃
𝐴𝑦 𝐵𝑦
𝑤
𝑤
𝑀 𝑀
𝐴 𝐵
𝑄 𝑄 𝐵𝑥
𝛼
𝑉 𝑉
𝐴𝑦 𝑃
𝐵𝑦

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-5
Sign Convention
Axial Force: ELONGATE
𝑦
𝑃
𝑥
𝑎 +→ ෍ 𝐹𝑥,𝐿 = 𝑄
𝐴 𝐵 𝑥

𝐴𝑥 𝑎 +← ෍ 𝐹𝑥,𝑅 = 𝑄
𝐿
𝐴𝑦 𝐵𝑦
𝑀

𝑄 𝑄 𝑄 𝑄
𝐴𝑥 𝑄
𝑥
𝐴𝑦 𝑉
(a) Equilibrium to left the (b) Positive axial force (c) Negative axial force
of section a-a

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-6
Sign Convention
Shear Force: TENDS TO ROTATE CLOCKWISE
𝑦
𝑃
𝑥
𝑎 +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦,𝐿 = 𝑉
𝐴 𝐵 𝑥

𝐴𝑥 𝑎 +↓ ෍ 𝐹𝑦,𝑅 = 𝑉
𝐿
𝐴𝑦 𝐵𝑦
𝑀

𝐴𝑥 𝑄
𝑥
𝐴𝑦 𝑉
(a) Equilibrium to left the (b) Positive shear (c) Negative shear
of section a-a

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-7
Sign Convention
Bending Moment: CONCAVE UPWARD (SMILE)
𝑦
𝑃
𝑥
𝑎 +↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐿 = 𝑀
𝐴 𝐵 𝑥

𝐴𝑥 𝑎 +↺ ෍ 𝑀𝑅 = 𝑀
𝐿
𝐴𝑦 𝐵𝑦
𝑀

𝐴𝑥 𝑄
𝑀 𝑀 𝑀 𝑀
𝑥
𝐴𝑦 𝑉
(a) Equilibrium to the left (b) Positive moment (c) Negative moment
of section a-a

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-8
Sign Convention
Sign Convention:
+→ ෍ 𝐹𝑥,𝐿 = 𝑄 +← ෍ 𝐹𝑥,𝑅 = 𝑄

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦,𝐿 = 𝑉 +↓ ෍ 𝐹𝑦,𝑅 = 𝑉

+↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐿 = 𝑀 +↺ ෍ 𝑀𝑅 = 𝑀

+𝑀 +𝑀

+𝑄 +𝑄

+𝑉 +𝑉
(a) Equilibrium to the left (b) Equilibrium to the right
of section a-a of section a-a

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-9
Relations of Load, Shear and Bending
𝑤(𝑥) 𝑤 𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥
𝑃
2
𝑑𝑥

𝑀 𝐶 𝑀 + 𝑑𝑀

𝑉 𝑉 + 𝑑𝑉
𝑅1 𝑅2
𝑑𝑥
𝑉2 𝑥2
෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 -
න 𝑑𝑉 = න 𝑤 𝑑𝑥
𝑉 + 𝑤 𝑑𝑥 − 𝑉 + 𝑑𝑉 = 0 𝑉1 𝑥1

𝑑𝑉 = 𝑤 𝑑𝑥 𝑉2 − 𝑉1 = ∆𝑉 = 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑

NEGLECT 𝑀2 𝑥2
෍ 𝑀𝐶 = 0
𝑑𝑥 න 𝑑𝑀 = න 𝑉 𝑑𝑥
𝑀 + 𝑉 𝑑𝑥 + 𝑤 𝑑𝑥 − (𝑀 + 𝑑𝑀) = 0 𝑀1 𝑥1
2
𝑑𝑀 = 𝑉 𝑑𝑥 𝑀2 − 𝑀1 = ∆𝑀 = 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-10
Relations of Load, Shear and Bending
𝑤
𝑤(𝑥)
For numerical values:
𝑤 − 𝑑𝑖𝑎
𝑥
∆𝑉 = 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑
𝑥1 𝑥2 ∆𝑀 = 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎
𝑅1 𝑅2 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟

𝑉
For qualitative shape:
𝑉 − 𝑑𝑖𝑎 ∆𝑉 = 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑(𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑑) 𝑑𝑉
𝑥 𝑤= = Slope of 𝑉𝑑𝑖𝑎
𝑑𝑥
𝑑𝑀
𝑀 𝑉= = Slope of 𝑀𝑑𝑖𝑎
𝑑𝑥
∆𝑀 = 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟(𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑑)
Maximum 𝑀
𝑀 − 𝑑𝑖𝑎
𝑥
Relations among load, shear, and moment diagrams

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-11
Shear and Bending Moment
Example 1: Determine the magnitudes and signs of the shear and
bending moment in the beam as shown at a section whose distance
from 𝐴 is: (a) 2 ft, (b) 10 ft, and (c) 15 ft.

10 kips

3 kips/ft 4 kips

4′ 8′ 6′

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-12
Shear and Bending Moment
Solution: 10 kips

3 kips/ft 4 kips

𝑀𝐴
𝐶
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵
4′ 8′ 6′
𝐴𝑦

Solving for the support reactions:

+↺ ෍ 𝑀𝐴 = 0 +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0

𝑀𝐴 − 3 12 6 − 10 4 − 4 18 = 0 𝐴𝑦 − 3 12 − 10 − 4 = 0
𝑀𝐴 = 328 kip-ft ↺ 𝐴𝑦 = 50 kips ↑

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-13
Shear and Bending Moment
10 kips

3 kips/ft 3 kips/ft 4 kips


𝑀𝐴 = 328 kip-ft 𝑀2 𝑀2
𝐶
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵
2′ 2′ 8′ 6′
𝑉2 𝑉2
𝐴𝑦 = 50 kips

a.) Shear and moment at a distance 2 ft from 𝐴.

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦,𝐿 = 0 +↺ ෍ 𝑀2,𝐿 = 0

50 − 3 2 − 𝑉2 = 0 𝑀2 + 328 − 50 2 + 3 2 1 = 0
𝑉2 = 44 kips ↓ 𝑀2 = −234 kips-ft
𝑀2 = 234 kips-ft ↻

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-14
Shear and Bending Moment
10 kips

3 kips/ft 3 kips/ft 4 kips


𝑀𝐴 = 328 kip-ft 𝑀10 𝑀10
𝐶
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 B'
4′ 6′ 2′ 6′
𝑉10 𝑉10
𝐴𝑦 = 50 kips

b.) Shear and moment at a distance 10 ft from 𝐴.

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦,𝐿 = 0 +↺ ෍ 𝑀10,𝐿 = 0

50 − 3 10 − 10 − 𝑉10 = 0 𝑀10 + 328 − 50 10 + 10 6 + 3(10)(5) = 0


𝑉2 = −10 kips
V10 𝑀10 = −38 kips-ft
𝑉2 = 10 kips ↑
V10 𝑀10 = 38 kips-ft ↻

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-15
Shear and Bending Moment
10 kips

3 kips/ft 4 kips
𝑀𝐴 = 328 kip-ft 𝑀15 𝑀15
𝐶
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵
4′ 8′ 3′ 3′
𝑉15 𝑉15
𝐴𝑦 = 50 kips

c.) Shear and moment at a distance 15 ft from 𝐴.

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦,𝑅 = 0 +↻ ෍ 𝑀15,𝑅 = 0

𝑉15 − 4 = 0 𝑀15 + 4(3) = 0


𝑉15 = 4 kips ↑ 𝑀15 = −12 kips-ft
𝑀15 = 12 kips-ft ↺

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-16
Shear and Bending Moment Equations
Example 2: Determine the shear and moment in the beam shown
below as a function of 𝑥. Draw the shear and bending moment
diagrams.

27 kN/m

3m 6m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-17
Shear and Bending Moment Equations
Solution:
27 kN/m

𝐴 𝐶
𝐵
𝐵𝑦 = 60.75 kN 𝐶𝑦 = 60.75 kN
3m 6m

Solving for the support reactions:

+↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐶 = 0 +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0

1 1
𝐵𝑦 6 − 27 9 3 = 0 𝐶𝑦 + 60.75 − 27 9 = 0
2 2
𝐵𝑦 = 60.75 kN ↑ 𝐶𝑦 = 60.75 kN ↑

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-18
Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams
27 kN/m

𝐴 𝐶
𝐵
𝐵𝑦 = 60.75 kN
3m 6m

𝑉 − 𝑑𝑖𝑎 47.25

(kN)
𝑥 (m)

2° −13.50

75.49 −60.75

𝑀 − 𝑑𝑖𝑎
(kN-m) 𝑥 (m)

3° −13.50

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-19
Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams
Example 3: Draw the shear and bending moment diagrams for the
beam shown in the figure below.

265 kN 30 kN/m
245 kN-m

3m 3m 3m 3m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-20
Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams
Solution:
265 kN 30 kN/m
245 kN-m
𝐴 𝐵
𝐸
𝐶 𝐷
3m 3m 3m 3m
𝐴𝑦 𝐷𝑦

Solving for the support reactions:

+↺ ෍ 𝑀𝐴 = 0 +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0

𝐷𝑦 9 − 265 3 + 245 − 30 6 6 + 3 = 0 𝐴𝑦 + 241.11 − 265 − 30(6) = 0


𝐷𝑦 = 241.11 kN ↑ 𝐴𝑦 = 203.89 kN ↑

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-21
Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams
265 kN 0D 30 kN/m
𝑽𝑨 = 𝟐𝟎𝟑. 𝟖𝟗 kN
245 kN-m
𝐴 𝐵
𝐸
𝐴𝑦 = 203.89 kN 𝐶 𝐷 𝐷𝑦 = 241.11 kN
𝑉𝐵,𝑅 = 203.89 − 265
3m 3m 3m 3m 𝑽𝑩,𝑹 = −𝟔𝟏. 𝟏𝟏 kN
203.89
𝑉 − 𝑑𝑖𝑎
90.00 𝑽𝑪 = −𝟔𝟏. 𝟏𝟏 kN
(kN)
𝑥 (m)

𝑉𝐷,𝐿 = −611.11 − 30(3)


−61.11
1D 𝑽𝑫,𝑳 = −𝟏𝟓𝟏. 𝟏𝟏 kN
−151.11

𝑉𝐷,𝑅 = −151.11 + 241.11


𝑽𝑫,𝑹 = 𝟗𝟎 kN

𝑉𝐸 = 90 − 30(3)
𝑽𝑬 = 𝟎 kN

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-22
Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams
265 kN 30 kN/m
𝑴𝑨 = 𝟎 kN-m
245 kN-m
𝐴 𝐵
𝐸 𝑀𝐵 = 0 + 203.89 3
𝐴𝑦 = 203.89 kN 𝐶 𝐷 𝐷𝑦 = 241.11 kN
3m 3m 3m 3m 𝑴𝑩 = 𝟔𝟏𝟏. 𝟔𝟕 kN-m
203.89
𝑉 − 𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑀𝐶,𝐿 = 611.67 − 61.11 3
(kN) 90.00
𝑥 (m) 𝑴𝑪,𝑳 = 𝟒𝟐𝟖. 𝟑𝟒 kN−m

−61.11 𝑀𝐶,𝑅 = 428.34 − 245


1D 𝑴𝑪,𝑹 = 𝟏𝟖𝟑. 𝟑𝟑 kN
611.67 −151.11
428.34 1
𝑀𝐷 = 183.33 − 61.11 + 151.11 3
2
183.33 𝑴𝑫 = −𝟏𝟑𝟓 kN-m
𝑀 − 𝑑𝑖𝑎 2°
(kN-m) 𝑥 (m) 1
𝑀𝐸 = −135 + 90 3
2D 2
−135.00 𝑴𝑬 = 𝟎 kN

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-23
Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams
Example 4: Obtain the internal force diagrams and the qualitative
deformation of the beam shown below.

20 kN/m 150 kN

4m 2m 2m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-24
Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams
Solution: internal
hinge 150 kN

𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
2m 2m
𝑉𝐵 𝐷𝑦

Solving for the support reactions:


The moment at the internal hinge is
equal to zero, hence

+↺ ෍ 𝑀𝐵 = 0

𝐷𝑦 4 − 150 2 = 0
𝐷𝑦 = 75 kN ↑

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-25
Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams
Solution: internal
20 kN/m hinge 150 kN
𝑀𝐴
𝐴
𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
4m 2m 2m
𝐴𝑦 𝐷𝑦 = 75 kN

Solving for the support reactions:

+↺ ෍ 𝑀𝐴 = 0 +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0

𝑀𝐴 − 20 4 2 − 150 6 + 75 8 = 0 𝐴𝑦 + 75 − 20 4 − 150 = 0
𝐷𝑦 = 460 kN-m ↺
Ma 𝐴𝑦 = 155 kN ↑

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-26
Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams
𝑀𝐴 = 460 kN-m 20 kN/m 150 kN

𝐴 𝐷
𝐴𝑦 = 155 kN 𝐵 𝐶
𝐷𝑦 = 75 kN
4m 2m 2m
155
𝑉 − 𝑑𝑖𝑎 75
(kN)
𝑥 (m)

−75
𝑀 − 𝑑𝑖𝑎 150
(kN-m) 𝑥 (m)


Elastic −460
curve 𝑥 (m)
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-27
Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams
Example 5: Draw the shear and bending moment diagrams and the
qualitative deflected shape for the statically indeterminate beam
shown below. The support reactions, determined by using the
procedures for the analysis of statically indeterminate beams in
subsequent lectures.

45 kN/m

𝐴 𝐵 𝐶
𝑀𝐴 = 110 kN-m 6m 6m 𝑀𝐶 = 110 kN-m
𝐴𝑦 = 135 kN 𝐶𝑦 = 135 kN
𝐵𝑦 = 270 kN

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-28
Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams
𝑀𝐴 = 110 kN-m 45 kN/m 𝑀𝐶 = 110 kN-m

𝐴 𝐶
𝐴𝑦 = 135 kN 𝐵 𝐵𝑦 = 270 kN 𝐶𝑦 = 135 kN
6m 6m
135 135
𝑉 − 𝑑𝑖𝑎
(kN) 𝑥 (m)

−135 −135
92.5 92.5
𝑀 − 𝑑𝑖𝑎 2° 2°
(kN-m) 𝑥 (m)

−110 −110 −110


Elastic
curve 𝐵 𝑥 (m)
𝐴 𝐷

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-29
CE 3104 – Structural Theory

Lecture 2.2:
Analysis of Frames

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020


Stability and Indeterminacy of Frames
General Concept for Analysis of Frames

𝐶
𝑃2

𝑃1 𝑃3

𝐴 𝐷

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-31
Stability and Indeterminacy of Frames
External Loads for the Idealized Frame

𝐶
𝑃2

𝑃1 𝑃3

𝐴
𝐴𝑋 𝐷

𝐷𝑦 𝐷𝑦

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-32
Stability and Indeterminacy of Frames
𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶
𝑪 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶
𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶 𝑃2
𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 𝑩 𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶
𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷
𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 𝑩 𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶
𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵 𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶
𝑪
𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵
𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵
𝑩

𝑃1 𝑃3

𝑨 𝑫
𝐴𝑥𝐴𝐵 𝑀𝐴𝐴𝐵 𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷
𝐴𝑦𝐴𝐵 𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐴𝐴𝐵𝐴𝐵
𝐴𝑥 𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷
𝑨 𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑨𝑿 Member and Joint Internal Loads 𝑫

𝑨𝒚 for the Idealized Frame 𝑫𝒚

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-33
Stability and Indeterminacy of Frames
𝑚 = number of members 𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶
𝑗 = number of joints 𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶
𝑟 = number of external reactions 𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶
𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 𝑩
𝑒𝑐 = number of conditional equations
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵
𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵
For each member: 6 unknown forces 𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵
Support reactions: 𝒓 unknown forces 𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵
𝑩
Total unknown forces: 𝟔𝒎 + 𝒓
𝑃1

For each member: 3 equations of equilibrium 𝑨


𝐴𝑥𝐴𝐵 𝑀𝐴𝐴𝐵
For each joint: 3 equations of equilibrium
Frame joint conditions: 𝒆𝒄 equations of equilibrium
Total available equations: 𝟑𝒎 + 𝟑𝒋 + 𝒆𝒄

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-34
Stability and Indeterminacy of Frames
𝑚 = number of members Condition for Statically
𝑗 = number of joints
𝑟 = number of external reactions Determinate Frame:
𝑒𝑐 = number of conditional equations 6𝑚 + 𝑟 = 3𝑚 + 3𝑗 + 𝑒𝑐
𝟑𝒎 + 𝒓 = 𝟑𝒋 + 𝒆𝒄
For each member: 6 unknown forces
Support reactions: 𝒓 unknown forces
Degree of Indeterminacy:
Total unknown forces: 𝟔𝒎 + 𝒓
𝒊 = (𝟑𝒎 + 𝒓) − (𝟑𝒋 + 𝒆𝒄 )
For each member: 3 equations of equilibrium
For each joint: 3 equations of equilibrium Redundant Forces:
Frame joint conditions: 𝒆𝒄 equations of equilibrium These are the excess forces
Total available equations: 𝟑𝒎 + 𝟑𝒋 + 𝒆𝒄 that cannot be solved using
the equilibrium equations
alone.

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-35
Stability and Indeterminacy of Frames
Statically Determinate Frame:
𝟑𝒎 + 𝒓 = 𝟑𝒋 + 𝒆𝒄

Statically Indeterminate Frame:


𝟑𝒎 + 𝒓 > 𝟑𝒋 + 𝒆𝒄

Statically Unstable Frame:


𝟑𝒎 + 𝒓 < 𝟑𝒋 + 𝒆𝒄

Degree of Indeterminacy:
𝒊 = (𝟑𝒎 + 𝒓) − (𝟑𝒋 + 𝒆𝒄 )

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-36
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Example 1: Draw the 15 kips
free-body, shear and 3′ 9′
bending moment
diagrams for all 𝐵 𝐶
members and joints of
the rigid frame. 8′

𝐴 16′
1.2 kips/ft

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-37
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Solution:
15 kips
Check for determinacy and stability:

3′ 9′ 3𝑚 + 𝑟 ⋛ 3𝑗 + 𝑒𝑐
𝐵 𝐶 3 3 +3⋛3 4 +0
𝟏𝟐 = 𝟏𝟐 Statically determinate!
8′

𝐴
16′
1.2 kips/ft

𝐷
𝐷𝑋
𝑀𝐷

𝐷𝑦

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-38
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams

15 kips
Solving for the support reactions:

3′ 9′ +↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐷 = 0
𝐵 𝐶
𝑀𝐷 + 1.2 8 12 − 15 9 = 0

8′ 𝑀𝐷 = 19.8 kip-ft ↻

𝐴
16′ +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 +← ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0
1.2 kips/ft
𝐷𝑦 − 15 = 0 𝐷𝑥 − 1.2(8) = 0
𝐷𝑦 = 15 kips ↑ 𝐷𝑥 = 9.6 kips ←

𝐷
𝐷𝑋
𝑀𝐷

𝐷𝑦

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-39
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Consider member 𝐴𝐵:
Solving for the internal forces at joint 𝐵:
𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵 +↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐵 = 0
𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵
𝐵
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵 − 1.2 8 4 = 0

8′ 𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 38.4 kip-ft ↻

𝐴 +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 +← ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0
1.2 kips/ft
𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵 = 0 𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 − 1.2(8) = 0
𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 = 9.6 kips ←
𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶
Consider joint 𝐵:
𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 = 𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶 = 9.6 kips
𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶
𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵
𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵 = 𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 = 0
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵
𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵 𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 = 38.4 kip-ft

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-40
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Consider member 𝐵𝐶: Solving for the internal forces at joint 𝐶:
15 kips
+↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐶 = 0
3′ 9′
𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶
𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 𝐵 𝐶 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶 − 𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 − 𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 12 − 15 9 = 0
𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶 = 173.4 kip-ft ↻
From joint 𝐵:
𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶 = 9.6 kips +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 +← ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0
𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 = 0
𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 = 38.4 kip-ft 𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶 − 𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 − 15 = 0 𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶 − 𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶 = 0
𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶 = 15 kips ↑ 𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶 = 9.6 kips ←
𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶
Consider joint 𝐶:
𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶 = 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷 = 9.6 kips
𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶
𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶 = 𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷 = 15 kips
𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷

𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶 = 𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷 = 173.4 kip-ft

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-41
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Consider member 𝐶𝐷: Solving for the internal forces at joint 𝐷:
𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷 From joint 𝐶:
+↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐷 = 0
𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷 = 9.6 kips
𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑪 𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷 = 15 kips 𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷 − 𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷 + 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷 16 = 0
𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷 = 173.4 kip-ft 𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷 = 19.8 kip-ft ↻

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 +← ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0
16′ Equilibrium checks
𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷 − 𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷 = 0 𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷 − 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷 = 0
at joint 𝐷:
𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷 = 15 kips ↑ 𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷 = 9.6 kips ←
𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷

𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷
𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷 𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷 = 𝐷𝑥 = 9.6 kips (check!)
𝑫
𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷 𝐷𝑥
𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷 𝑀𝐷
𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷 = 𝐷𝑦 = 15 kips (check!)

𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷 𝐷𝑦 𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷 = 𝑀𝐷 = 19.8 kip-ft (check!)

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-42
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 15 kips 𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶

𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 3′ 9′ 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶
𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶
𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 𝑩 𝑩 𝑪 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 𝑪 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵 𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷
𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵 𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵
𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷
𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑩 𝑪
8′
𝑨
16′
1.2 kips/ft

𝑫
𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷
𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷
𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑫
𝐷𝑥
𝑀𝐷
Frame member FBD: 𝐷𝑦

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-43
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
15 kips

3′ 9′
9.6 kips 9.6 kips
38.4 kip−ft 𝑩 𝑪 173.4 kip−ft
15 kips 15 kips
38.4 kip-ft
9.6 kips 173.4 kip-ft
9.6 kips
−9.6
𝑩 −15 𝑪
8′
𝑨
16′ 9.6
1.2 kips/ft

𝑫
19.8 kip-ft 9.6 kips
15 kips

Member shear diagram (kips):


University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-44
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
15 kips

3′ 9′
9.6 kips 9.6 kips
38.4 kip−ft 𝑩 𝑪 173.4 kip−ft
15 kips 15 kips
38.4 kip-ft
9.6 kips 173.4 kip-ft
−38.4 9.6 kips
𝑩 𝑪 173.4
−38.4
8′ 2°
𝑨
16′
1.2 kips/ft −173.4

𝑫 19.8
19.8 kip-ft 9.6 kips
15 kips

Member moment diagram (kip-ft):


University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-45
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
15 kips

𝐵 𝐶

𝐴
1.2 kips/ft

Qualitative deflected shape


University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-46
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Example 2: Draw the shear, bending moment, and axial force
diagrams and the qualitative deflected shape for the frame shown.
30 kN/m

80 kN
𝐵 10 m 𝐶

5m

6.5 m
𝐷

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-47
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Solution:
30 kN/m
Check for determinacy and
80 kN stability:
𝐵 10 m 𝐶
3𝑚 + 𝑟 ⋛ 3𝑗 + 𝑒𝑐

5m 3 3 +3⋛3 4 +0

6.5 m 𝟏𝟐 = 𝟏𝟐 Statically determinate!

𝐴
𝐷𝑦
𝐴𝑋

𝐴𝑦

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-48
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Solving for the support reactions:
30 kN/m
+↺ ෍ 𝑀𝐴 = 0
80 kN
𝐵 10 m 𝐶 𝐷𝑦 10 − 30 10 5 − 80 6.5 = 0
𝐷𝑦 = 202 kN ↑
5m

6.5 m +← ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0

𝐷 𝐴𝑥 − 80 = 0
𝐴
𝐷𝑦
𝐴𝑥 = 80 kN ←
𝐴𝑋

𝐴𝑦 +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0

𝐴𝑦 + 𝐷𝑦 − 30 10 = 0
𝐴𝑦 = 98 kN ↑

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-49
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Consider joint 𝐴 then Solving for the internal forces at joint 𝐵:
member 𝐴𝐵:
𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵
+↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐵 = 0
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵
𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵 − 𝐴𝑥𝐴𝐵 6.5 = 0
𝑩

6.5 m
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 520 kN-m ↺

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 +← ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0
𝐴𝑦𝐴𝐵
𝑀𝐴𝐴𝐵 𝑨
𝐴𝑥𝐴𝐵
𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵 − 𝐴𝑦𝐴𝐵 = 0 𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 − 𝐴𝑥𝐴𝐵 = 0
𝐴𝑥𝐴𝐵
𝑨 𝐴𝑥 𝑀𝐴𝐴𝐵 𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵 = 98 kN ↓ 𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 = 80 kN ←
𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶
𝐴𝑦
𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶 = 𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 − 80 = 0
Consider joint 𝐵: 80 kN 𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶
𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵 = 𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 = 98 kN
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵
𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵 𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 = 520 kN−m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-50
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Consider member 𝐵𝐶: Solving for the internal forces at joint 𝐶:
30 kN/m
+↺ ෍ 𝑀𝐶 = 0
𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶
𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 𝐵 10 m 𝐶 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶 − 𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 − 𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 10 + 30 10 5 = 0
𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶 = 0
From joint 𝐵:
𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶 = 0 +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 +← ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0
𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 = 98 kN
𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 = 520 kN−m 𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶 + 𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 − 30(10) = 0 𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶 − 𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶 = 0
𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶 = 202 kN ↑ 𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶 = 0
𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶
Consider joint 𝐶:
𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶 = 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷 = 0
𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶
𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶 = 𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷 = 202 kN
𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷

𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶 = 𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷 = 0

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-51
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Consider member 𝐶𝐷: Solving for the internal forces at joint 𝐷:
𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷 From joint 𝐶:
+↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐷 = 0
𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷 = 0
𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑪 𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷 = 202 kN 𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷 − 𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷 + 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷 6 = 0
𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷 = 0 𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷 = 0

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 +← ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0
5m Equilibrium checks
𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷 − 𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷 = 0 𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷 − 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷 = 0
at joint 𝐷:
𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷 = 202 kN ↑ 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷 = 0
𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷

𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷
𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷 𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷 = 𝐷𝑥 = 0 (check!)
𝑫
𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷 𝐷𝑥
𝑀𝐷 𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷 = 𝐷𝑦 = 202 kN (check!)
𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷
𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷 𝐷𝑦 𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷 = 𝑀𝐷 = 0 (check!)

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-52
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 30 kN/m 𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶
𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶
𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐶 𝑀𝐶𝐵𝐶
80 kN 𝐵𝑥𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑥𝐵𝐶
𝑩 𝑩 10 m 𝑪 𝑪 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵 𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷
𝐵𝑦𝐴𝐵 𝐵𝑦𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑦𝐵𝐶 𝐶𝑦𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐵𝐴𝐵
𝑀𝐶𝐶𝐷
𝐵𝑥𝐴𝐵 𝐶𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑩 𝑪
5m
6.5 m
𝑫 𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑨 𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷
𝐴𝑥𝐴𝐵
𝐷𝑦𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐴𝐴𝐵
𝐴𝑦𝐴𝐵 𝑀𝐷𝐶𝐷
𝐷𝑥𝐶𝐷
𝑀𝐴𝐴𝐵 𝑫
𝐴𝑥𝐴𝐵
𝑨 𝐴𝑥
𝐷𝑦
𝐴𝑦
Frame member FBD:
University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-53
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Example 3: A gable
frame, with joint 𝐶 𝐶
acting as an internal
hinge, is subjected to 1.5 m
a wind loading as
shown. Determine 𝐵 𝐷
the reactions at its

3.75 kN/m

2.40 kN/m
supports due to the 4m
loading.
𝐴 𝐸

2m 2m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-54
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Solution:
Check for determinacy and stability:
𝐶
3𝑚 + 𝑟 ⋛ 3𝑗 + 𝑒𝑐

1.5 m 3 4 +4⋛3 5 +1
𝟏𝟔 = 𝟏𝟔 Statically determinate!
𝐵 𝐷
3.75 kN/m

2.40 kN/m
4m

𝐴 𝐸
𝐴𝑥 𝐸𝑥
𝐴𝑦 𝐸𝑦
2m 2m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-55
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Solving for the support reactions:
𝐶 +↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐸 = 0

𝐴𝑦 4 + 3.75 + 2.40 4 2
1.5 m
5 3 3 5
3
4 4 + 0.75 2.5 4 + 0.75
𝐵 𝐷 5
4
− 0.75 2.5 2+1
5
3.75 kN/m

2.40 kN/m
4m 3
+ 3.30 2.5 4 + 0.75
5
4
𝐴 𝐸 + 3.30 2.5 1 =0
𝐴𝑥 𝐸𝑥 5
𝐴𝑦 𝐸𝑦 𝐴𝑦 = −20.04 kN
2m 2m
𝐴𝑦 = 20.04 kN ↓

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-56
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Solving for the support reactions:
𝐶 +↺ ෍ 𝑀𝐶,𝐿 = 0
𝐶𝑥

1.5 m 𝐶𝑦 𝐴𝑥 5.5 + 20.04 2


5 3
4 + 0.75 2.5 1.25
𝐵
+ 3.75 4 (1.5 + 2) = 0
3.75 kN/m

4m 𝐴𝑥 = −17.26 kN
𝐴𝑥 = 17.26 kN ⟵
𝐴
𝐴𝑥
𝐴𝑦 = 20.04 kN
2m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-57
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Solving for the support reactions:
𝐶 +→ ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0

1.5 m 𝐸𝑥 − 17.26 + 3.75 + 2.40 4


5 3 3 5
3
4 4 + 0.75 2.5
𝐵 𝐷 5
3
+ 3.30 2.5 =0
3.75 kN/m

2.40 kN/m
5
4m
𝐸𝑥 = −13.42 kN
𝐸𝑥 = 13.42 kN ⟵
𝐴 𝐸
𝐴𝑥 = 17.26 kN 𝐸𝑥
𝐴𝑦 = 20.04 kN 𝐸𝑦
2m 2m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-58
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Solving for the support reactions:
𝐶 +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0

1.5 m
4
5 3 3 5 𝐸𝑦 − 16.03 − 0.75 2.5
4 4
5
4
𝐵 𝐷 + 3.30 2.5 =0
5
3.75 kN/m

2.40 kN/m
𝐸𝑦 = 14.94 kN ↑
4m

𝐸𝑥 = 13.42 kN 𝐸
𝐴
𝐴𝑥 = 17.26 kN
𝐴𝑦 = 20.04 kN 𝐸𝑦
2m 2m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-59
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Equilibrium Checks:
𝐶 +← ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0

1.5 m
5 3 3 5 17.26 + 13.42
4 4
− 3.75 + 2.40 (4)
𝐵 𝐷
− 0.75 + 3.30 2.5 0.6 = 0
3.75 kN/m

2.40 kN/m
𝟎 = 𝟎 checks!
4m

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0
𝐸𝑥 = 13.42 kN 𝐸
𝐴
𝐴𝑥 = 17.26 kN
−20.04 + 14.94
𝐴𝑦 = 20.04 kN 𝐸𝑦 = 14.94 kN
2m 2m + −0.75 + 3.30 2.5 0.8 = 0
𝟎 = 𝟎 checks!

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-60
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Equilibrium Checks:
𝐶 +↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐶 = 0

1.5 m
5 3 3 5 + 17.26 + 13.42 5.5
4 4
− 20.04 + 14.94 2
𝐵 𝐷
− 3.75 + 2.40 (4) 3.5
3.75 kN/m

2.40 kN/m
4m
− 0.75 + 3.30 2.5 1.25 = 0
𝟎 = 𝟎 checks!

𝐸𝑥 = 13.42 kN 𝐸
𝐴
𝐴𝑥 = 17.26 kN
𝐴𝑦 = 20.04 kN 𝐸𝑦 = 14.94 kN
2m 2m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-61
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Example 4: A gable
frame is subjected to 12 kN/m
a snow loading as
shown. Draw the
shear, bending 𝐶
3m
moment, and axial
force diagrams and 𝐵 𝐷
the qualitative
deflected shape for
5m
the frame.

𝐴 𝐸

4m 4m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-62
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Solution:
12 kN/m Check for determinacy and stability:
3𝑚 + 𝑟 ⋛ 3𝑗 + 𝑒𝑐
𝐶 3 4 +4⋛3 5 +1
3m
𝟏𝟔 = 𝟏𝟔 Statically determinate!
𝐵 𝐷

5m

𝐴 𝐸
𝐴𝑥 𝐸𝑥
𝐴𝑦 𝐸𝑦
4m 4m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-63
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Solution: Solving for the support reactions:
12 kN/m
+↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐸 = 0
𝐶 𝐴𝑦 8 − 12 8 4 = 0
3m
𝐴𝑦 = 48 kN ↑
𝐵 𝐷

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0
5m
𝐸𝑦 + 48 − 12 8 4 = 0
𝐸𝑦 = 48 kN ↑
𝐴 𝐸
𝐴𝑥 𝐸𝑥
𝐴𝑦 𝐸𝑦
4m 4m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-64
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Solution: Solving for the support reactions:
12 kN/m
𝐶 +↺ ෍ 𝑀𝐶,𝐿 = 0
𝐶𝑥
𝐶𝑦
𝐴𝑥 8 − 48 4 + 12 4 2 = 0
3m
𝐴𝑥 = 12 kN →
𝐵

+→ ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0 +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0
5m 𝐶𝑥 + 12 = 0 𝐶𝑦 + 48 − 12(4) = 0
𝐶𝑥 = −12 𝐶𝑦 = 0
𝐴 𝐶𝑥 = 12 kN ←
𝐴𝑥
𝐴𝑦 = 48 kN
4m
By symmetry of the structure:
𝐸𝑥 = 12 kN ← 𝐸𝑌 = 48 kN ↑

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-65
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Solution:
12 kN/m
9.6 kN
𝐶
12 kN 12 kN

3m 7.2 kN
5 3
12 kN 12 kN 4
𝐵
48 kN 48 kN 38.4 kN 31.2 kN
4m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-66
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Member FBD:

𝑪 9.6 kN 9.6 kN 𝑪

7.2 kN 7.2 kN
60 kN-m 60 kN-m
𝑩 𝑫
38.4 kN
38.4 kN 31.2 kN 31.2 kN

𝑥 𝑥
48 kN 48 kN
60 kN-m 60 kN-m
𝑩 𝑫
12 kN 12 kN

𝑨 12 kN 𝑦 𝑬 12 kN
𝑦

48 kN 48 kN

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-67
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Shear diagram (kN):

𝑪 9.6 kN 9.6 kN 𝑪

7.2 kN 7.2 kN
60 kN-m 7.2 60 kN-m
𝑩 −7.2 𝑫
38.4 kN
38.4 kN 31.2 kN 31.2 kN
31.2
𝑥 𝑥
48 kN −31.2 48 kN
60 kN-m 60 kN-m
𝑩 𝑫
12 kN 12 kN
−12 12

𝑨 12 kN 𝑦 𝑬 12 kN
𝑦

48 kN 48 kN

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-68
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Moment diagram (kN-m):

𝑪 9.6 kN 9.6 kN 𝑪

7.2 kN 7.2 kN
60 kN-m 60 kN-m
𝑩 3.38 3.38 𝑫
38.4 kN
38.4 kN 31.2 kN 31.2 kN

𝑥 𝑥
48 kN −60 −60 48 kN
60 kN-m −60 60 kN-m 60
𝑩 𝑫
12 kN 12 kN

𝑨 12 kN 𝑦 𝑬 12 kN
𝑦

48 kN 48 kN

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-69
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Axial diagram (kN):

𝑪 9.6 kN 9.6 kN 𝑪

7.2 kN 7.2 kN
60 kN-m 60 kN-m
𝑩 −9.6 −9.6 𝑫
38.4 kN
38.4 kN 31.2 kN 31.2 kN

𝑥 𝑥
−38.4 −38.4
48 kN 48 kN
60 kN-m 60 kN-m
𝑩 𝑫
12 kN 12 kN
−48 −48

𝑨 12 kN 𝑦 𝑬 12 kN
𝑦

48 kN 48 kN

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-70
Frames: Shear and Moment Diagrams
Qualitative deflected shape of the frame
12 kN/m

𝐵 𝐷

𝐴 𝐸

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-71
CE 3104 – Structural Theory

Lecture 2.3:
Analysis of Trusses

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020


Internal Stability of Trusses
Simple Trusses
𝐶 𝐶 𝐷

𝐴 𝐵 𝐴 𝐵

𝐶 𝐷
Total number of truss
members:
𝑚 =3+2 𝑗−3
𝑚 = 2𝑗 − 3
𝐴 𝐸
𝐵

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-73
Internal Stability of Trusses
Compound Trusses
𝐶 𝐹

𝐴 𝐵 𝐷 𝐸

𝐶(𝐹)
Conditions for stability:
1. At least 3 transmitted forces
2. Non-concurrent forces
3. Non-parallel forces
4. 𝑚 = 2𝑗 − 3
𝐴 𝐵 𝐷 𝐸

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-74
Stability and Indeterminacy of Trusses
General Concept for
Analysis of Trusses
𝑃1 𝑃3

𝐷
𝐶 𝑃2

𝐴 𝐵

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-75
Stability and Indeterminacy of Trusses
Idealized Truss Model

𝑃1 𝑃3

𝑪 𝑫
𝑃2

𝑨 𝑩
𝑨𝑿
𝑨𝒚 𝑩𝒚

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-76
Stability and Indeterminacy of Trusses
𝑷𝟏 𝑷𝟑
𝑭𝑪𝑫 𝑭𝑪𝑫 𝑪 𝑭𝑪𝑫 𝑭𝑪𝑫
𝑫 𝑫
𝑪 𝑷𝟐
𝑭𝑨𝑪 𝑭𝑩𝑪 𝑭𝑨𝑪
𝑭𝑨𝑪 𝑭𝑩𝑪 𝑭𝑨𝑪

𝑪 𝑪 𝑫

𝑨
Member and Joint Internal 𝑩 𝑩

𝑭𝑨𝑪
Loads for the Idealized Truss 𝑭𝑩𝑪 𝑭𝑩𝑫
𝑭𝑨𝑪 𝑭𝑩𝑪 𝑭𝑩𝑫
𝑨
𝑨𝑿 𝑭𝑨𝑩 𝑭𝑨𝑩 𝑭𝑨𝑩 𝑭𝑨𝑩 𝑩
𝑨 𝑩
𝑨𝒚 𝑩𝒚

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-77
Stability and Indeterminacy of Trusses
𝑚 = number of members
𝑗 = number of joints 𝑭𝑨𝑪
𝑟 = number of external reactions
𝑪

𝑨
For each member: 1 unknown force
𝑭𝑨𝑪
Support reactions: 𝒓 unknown forces
𝑭𝑨𝑪
Total unknown forces: 𝒎 + 𝒓 𝑨
𝑨𝑿 𝑭𝑨𝑩 𝑭𝑨𝑩 𝑭𝑨𝑩
𝑨 𝑩
𝑨𝒚

For each joint: 2 equations of equilibrium


Total available equations: 𝟐𝒋

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-78
Stability and Indeterminacy of Trusses
𝑚 = number of members Condition for Statically
𝑗 = number of joints
𝑟 = number of external reactions Determinate Truss:
𝒎 + 𝒓 = 𝟐𝒋

For each member: 1 unknown force


Degree of Indeterminacy:
Support reactions: 𝒓 unknown forces
Total unknown forces: 𝒎 + 𝒓 𝒊 = (𝒎 + 𝒓) − (𝟐𝒋)

Redundant Forces:
For each joint: 2 equations of equilibrium
These are the excess forces
Total available equations: 𝟐𝒋
that cannot be solved using
the equilibrium equations
alone.

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-79
Stability and Indeterminacy of Trusses

Statically Determinate Truss:


𝒎 + 𝒓 = 𝟐𝒋

Statically Indeterminate Truss:


𝒎 + 𝒓 > 𝟐𝒋

Statically Unstable Truss:


𝒎 + 𝒓 < 𝟐𝒋

Degree of Indeterminacy:
𝒊 = (𝒎 + 𝒓) − 𝟐𝒋

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-80
Method of Joints
Example 1: Determine the force in each member of the Warren
truss shown by the method of joints.

𝐹 𝐺 𝐻

4.5 m
𝐴 𝐸
𝐵 𝐶 𝐷

100 kN 125 kN 50 kN
4 at 6 m = 24 m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-81
Method of Joints
Solution:
𝑭 𝑮 𝑯

4.5 m
𝑨 𝑬
𝐴𝑥
𝑩 𝑪 𝑫
𝐴𝑦 𝐸𝑦
100 kN 125 kN 50 kN
4 at 6 m = 24 m

Check for determinacy and stability:


𝑚 + 𝑟 ⋛ 2𝑗
13 + 3 ⋛ 2(8)
𝟏𝟔 = 𝟏𝟔 Statically determinate!

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-82
Method of Joints

𝑭 𝑮 𝑯

4.5 m
𝑨 𝑬
𝐴𝑥
𝑩 𝑪 𝑫
𝐴𝑦 𝐸𝑦
100 kN 125 kN 50 kN
4 at 6 m = 24 m

Solving for the support reactions:


+↺ ෍ 𝑀𝐴 = 0 +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0

𝐸𝑦 24 − 100 6 − 125 12 − 50 18 = 0 𝐴𝑦 + 125 − 100 − 125 − 50 = 0


𝐸𝑦 = 125 kN ↑ 𝐴𝑦 = 150 kN ↑

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-83
Method of Joints
Joint Analysis

𝐹𝐴𝐹
𝑨

𝐹𝐴𝐵
𝐴𝑦 = 150 kN

From Joint 𝐴:

+↓ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 +→ ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0

𝐹𝐴𝐹 0.6 − 150 = 0 𝐹𝐴𝐵 − 250 0.8 = 0


𝐹𝐴𝐹 = 250 kN, 𝐶 𝐹𝐴𝐵 = 200 kN, 𝑇

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-84
Method of Joints
Joint Analysis

𝐹𝐵𝐹
𝑨 +200
𝑩 𝐹𝐵𝐶
𝐴𝑦 = 150 kN
100 kN

From Joint 𝐵:

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 +→ ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0

𝐹𝐵𝐹 − 100 = 0 𝐹𝐵𝐶 − 200 = 0


𝐹𝐵𝐹 = 100 kN, 𝑇 𝐹𝐵𝐶 = 200 kN, 𝑇

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-85
Method of Joints
Joint Analysis
𝑭 𝐹𝐹𝐺

𝐹𝐶𝐹

+100
𝑨 +200 +200
𝑩
𝐴𝑦 = 150 kN
100 kN

From Joint 𝐹:

+↓ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 +← ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0

𝐹𝐶𝐹 0.6 − 250(0.6) + 100 = 0 𝐹𝐹𝐺 − 250 + 83.33 0.8 = 0


𝐹𝐶𝐹 = 83.33 kN, 𝑇 𝐹𝐹𝐺 = 266.67 kN, 𝐶

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-86
Method of Joints
Joint Analysis
𝑭 −266.67 𝑮 −266.67

+100
𝐹𝐶𝐻
𝑨 +200 +200
𝑩 𝑪 𝐹𝐶𝐷
𝐴𝑦 = 150 kN
100 kN 125 kN

From Joint 𝐶:

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 +→ ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0

𝐹𝐶𝐻 0.6 + 83.33 0.6 − 125 = 0 𝐹𝐶𝐷 + 125 − 83.33 0.8 − 200 = 0
𝐹𝐶𝐻 = 125 kN, 𝑇 𝐹𝐶𝐷 = 166.67 kN, 𝑇

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-87
Method of Joints
Joint Analysis
𝑭 −266.67 𝑮 −266.67 𝑯

𝐹𝐸𝐻

+100

+50
𝑨 +200 +200 +166.67 +166.67
𝑩 𝑪 𝑫
𝐴𝑦 = 150 kN
100 kN 125 kN 50 kN

From Joint 𝐻:

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0

𝐹𝐸𝐻 0.6 − 125 0.6 − 50 = 0


𝐹𝐸𝐻 = 208.33 kN, 𝐶

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-88
Method of Joints
Joint Analysis
𝑭 −266.67 𝑮 −266.67 𝑯

+100

+50
𝑨 +200 +200 +166.67 +166.67 𝑬
𝑩 𝑪 𝑫
𝐴𝑦 = 150 kN 𝐸𝑦 = 125 kN
100 kN 125 kN 50 kN

From Joint 𝐸 (for checking):

+↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0 +→ ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0

125 − 208.33(0.6) = 0 208.33(0.8) − 166.67 = 0


0=0 0=0

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-89
Method of Joints

𝑭 −266.67 𝑮 −266.67 𝑯

+100

+50
0 4.5 m
𝑨 +200 +200 +166.67 +166.67 𝑬
𝑩 𝑪 𝑫
𝐴𝑦 = 150 kN 𝐸𝑦 = 125 kN
100 kN 125 kN 50 kN
4 at 6 m = 24 m

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-90
Method of Sections
Example 2: Using method of sections, determine the type and
magnitude of stress in members 𝐺𝐻, 𝐶𝐻, and 𝐶𝐷 of the truss shown
below.
𝐻 𝐼
𝐺 𝐽 5 ft

15 ft

𝐴 𝐹
𝐵 𝐶 𝐷 𝐸

18 kips 24 kips
5 at 15 ft = 75 ft

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-91
Method of Sections
Solution: 𝑯 𝑰

𝑮 𝑱 5 ft

15 ft

𝑨 𝑭
𝐴𝑥
𝑩 𝑪 𝑫 𝑬
𝐴𝑦 𝐸𝑦
18 kips 24 kips
5 at 15 ft = 75 ft

Check for determinacy and stability:


𝑚 + 𝑟 ⋛ 2𝑗
17 + 3 ⋛ 2(10)
𝟐𝟎 = 𝟐𝟎 Statically determinate!

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-92
Method of Sections
𝑯 𝑰

𝑮 𝑱 5 ft

15 ft

𝑨 𝑭
𝐴𝑥
𝑩 𝑪 𝑫 𝑬
𝐴𝑦 𝐸𝑦
18 kips 24 kips
5 at 15 ft = 75 ft

Solving for the support reactions:


+↺ ෍ 𝑀𝐴 = 0 +↑ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0

𝐸𝑦 75 − 18 15 − 24 30 = 0 𝐴𝑦 + 13.2 − 18 − 24 = 0
𝐸𝑦 = 13.2 kips ↑ 𝐴𝑦 = 28.8 kips ↑

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-93
Method of Sections
Solving for the member 𝑯 𝑰
𝐹𝐺𝐻
stresses: 𝑮 10 𝑱 5 ft
1
3 𝐹𝐶𝐻

+↻ ෍ 𝑀𝐻 = 0
15 ft
𝐹𝐶𝐷 20 − 13.2(45) = 0 𝐹𝐶𝐷 𝑭

𝐹𝐶𝐷 = 29.7 kips, 𝑇 𝑪 𝑫 𝑬


𝐸𝑦 = 13.2 kips

3 at 15 ft = 45 ft
+← ෍ 𝐹𝑥 = 0

3 +↓ ෍ 𝐹𝑦 = 0
𝐹𝐺𝐻 + 29.7 = 0
10 1
𝐹𝐺𝐻 = −31.31 kips 𝐹𝐶𝐻 + −31.31 − 13.2 = 0
10
𝐹𝐺𝐻 = 31.31 kips, 𝐶 𝐹𝐶𝐻 = 23.10 kips, 𝑇

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-94
References
Textbooks:
1. Kassimali, A., 2010, “Structural Analysis”, Fourth Edition,
Cengage Learning, CT, USA
2. Singer, F. and Pytel, A., “Strength of Materials”, Fourth
Edition, Harper & Row, NY, USA

University of San Carlos | Department of Civil Engineering | September 9–16, 2020 Lecture 2-95

You might also like