Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • JL Digital Tools Checklist m3

    Uploaded by

    api-446317333
    135 views4 pages
    The document provides reviews of three digital tools - Nearpod, Minecraft Education Edition, and Canva - using a 5 category rating scale. Nearpod received all 10s, indicating it fully met all review criteria of having necessary background info, being engaging and easy to use, connecting to curriculum standards, including necessary accessibility features, and ability to assess students in engaging ways. Minecraft Education Edition scored lower, between 7-8, meeting some but not all criteria. Canva scored highest in background info and design/functionality but only a 7 for connection to curriculum.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    jl digital tools checklist m3

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides reviews of three digital tools - Nearpod, Minecraft Education Edition, and Canva - using a 5 category rating scale. Nearpod received all 10s, indicating it fully met all review criteria of having necessary background info, being engaging and easy to use, connecting to curriculum standards, including necessary accessibility features, and ability to assess students in engaging ways. Minecraft Education Edition scored lower, between 7-8, meeting some but not all criteria. Canva scored highest in background info and design/functionality but only a 7 for connection to curriculum.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    135 views4 pages

    JL Digital Tools Checklist m3

    Uploaded by

    api-446317333
    The document provides reviews of three digital tools - Nearpod, Minecraft Education Edition, and Canva - using a 5 category rating scale. Nearpod received all 10s, indicating it fully met all review criteria of having necessary background info, being engaging and easy to use, connecting to curriculum standards, including necessary accessibility features, and ability to assess students in engaging ways. Minecraft Education Edition scored lower, between 7-8, meeting some but not all criteria. Canva scored highest in background info and design/functionality but only a 7 for connection to curriculum.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    Quick Digital Tool Checklist Nearpod

    Joseph Lewis
    Categories Question Scale Rating Comment

    1. Background Does the app have the Yes, the app has the needed 10
    Information prerequisite background background info. (9-10)
    information for staff and
    students to use? The app has some needed
    background info. (4-8)

    The app contains little to no


    useful/needed background
    info. (0-3)

    2. Design Features/ Is the app engaging and easy Yes, the app is engaging and 10
    Functionality to use? easy to use. (9-10)

    The app’s ease of use or


    ability to engage does not
    meet expectations, but it can
    meet ease of use or
    engagement needs. (4-8)

    The app is not engaging or


    easy to use. (0-3)

    3. Connection to Does the app meet the Yes, the app meets/exceeds 10
    Curriculum curricular standards? curricular standards and is
    rigorous. (8-10)

    The app meets some or most


    of curricular standards. (4-7)

    The app does not meet


    relevant curriculum
    standards. (0-3)

    4. Accessibility Does the app have necessary The app has most, if not all 10
    accessibility features for my needed features. (9-10)
    students?
    The app contains some
    features OR has unneeded
    accessibility features. (4-8)

    The app does not meet


    accessibility requirements.
    (0-3)

    5. Instructional Features Does the app assess The app creates an engaging 10
    students in engaging and and rigorous atmosphere for
    rigorous ways? assessments.
    (9-10)

    The app assesses students,


    but engagement or rigor is in
    question. (4-8)

    No ability to assess or the


    assessment is not
    appropriate (0-3)
    Quick Digital Tool Checklist Minecraft Education Edition
    Joseph Lewis
    Categories Question Scale Rating Comment

    1. Background Information Does the app have the Yes, the app has the needed 8
    prerequisite background background info. (9-10)
    information for staff and
    students to use? The app has some needed
    background info. (4-8)

    The app contains little to no


    useful/needed background
    info. (0-3)

    2 Design Features/ Is the app engaging and easy Yes, the app is engaging and 7
    Functionality to use? easy to use. (9-10)

    The app’s ease of use or


    ability to engage does not
    meet expectations, but it can
    meet ease of use or
    engagement needs. (4-8)

    The app is not engaging or


    easy to use. (0-3)

    3. Connection to Curriculum Does the app meet the Yes, the app meets/exceeds 7
    curricular standards? curricular standards and is
    rigorous. (8-10)

    The app meets some or most


    of curricular standards. (4-7)

    The app does not meet


    relevant curriculum
    standards. (0-3)

    4 Accessibility Does the app have necessary The app has most, if not all 8
    accessibility features for my needed features. (9-10)
    students?
    The app contains some
    features OR has unneeded
    accessibility features. (4-8)

    The app does not meet


    accessibility requirements.
    (0-3)

    5 Instructional Features Does the app assess The app creates an engaging 8
    students in engaging and and rigorous atmosphere for
    rigorous ways? assessments.
    (9-10)

    The app assesses students,


    but engagement or rigor is in
    question. (4-8)

    No ability to assess or the


    assessment is not
    appropriate (0-3)
    Quick Digital Tool Checklist Canva
    Joseph Lewis
    Categories Question Scale Rating Comment

    1. Background Does the app have the Yes, the app has the needed 9
    Information prerequisite background background info. (9-10)
    information for staff and
    students to use? The app has some needed
    background info. (4-8)

    The app contains little to no


    useful/needed background
    info. (0-3)

    2. Design Features/ Is the app engaging and easy Yes, the app is engaging and 9
    Functionality to use? easy to use. (9-10)

    The app’s ease of use or


    ability to engage does not
    meet expectations, but it can
    meet ease of use or
    engagement needs. (4-8)

    The app is not engaging or


    easy to use. (0-3)

    3. Connection to Curriculum Does the app meet the Yes, the app meets/exceeds 7
    curricular standards? curricular standards and is
    rigorous. (8-10)

    The app meets some or most


    of curricular standards. (4-7)

    The app does not meet


    relevant curriculum
    standards. (0-3)

    4. Accessibility Does the app have necessary The app has most, if not all 8
    accessibility features for my needed features. (9-10)
    students?
    The app contains some
    features OR has unneeded
    accessibility features. (4-8)

    The app does not meet


    accessibility requirements.
    (0-3)

    5. Instructional Features Does the app assess The app creates an engaging 8
    students in engaging and and rigorous atmosphere for
    rigorous ways? assessments.
    (9-10)

    The app assesses students,


    but engagement or rigor is in
    question. (4-8)

    No ability to assess or the


    assessment is not
    appropriate (0-3)
    Quick Digital Tool Checklist Flip
    Joseph Lewis
    Categories Question Scale Rating Comment

    1. Background Does the app have the Yes, the app has the needed 8
    Information prerequisite background background info. (9-10)
    information for staff and
    students to use? The app has some needed
    background info. (4-8)

    The app contains little to no


    useful/needed background
    info. (0-3)

    2. Design Features/ Is the app engaging and easy Yes, the app is engaging and 8
    Functionality to use? easy to use. (9-10)

    The app’s ease of use or


    ability to engage does not
    meet expectations, but it can
    meet ease of use or
    engagement needs. (4-8)

    The app is not engaging or


    easy to use. (0-3)

    3. Connection to Does the app meet the Yes, the app meets/exceeds 9
    Curriculum curricular standards? curricular standards and is
    rigorous. (8-10)

    The app meets some or most


    of curricular standards. (4-7)

    The app does not meet


    relevant curriculum
    standards. (0-3)

    4. Accessibility Does the app have necessary The app has most, if not all 6
    accessibility features for my needed features. (9-10)
    students?
    The app contains some
    features OR has unneeded
    accessibility features. (4-8)

    The app does not meet


    accessibility requirements.
    (0-3)

    5. Instructional Does the app assess The app creates an engaging 7


    Features students in engaging and and rigorous atmosphere for
    rigorous ways? assessments.
    (9-10)

    The app assesses students,


    but engagement or rigor is in
    question. (4-8)

    No ability to assess or the


    assessment is not
    appropriate (0-3)

    You might also like