The document outlines a rubric for evaluating presentations on aircraft designs with criteria for organization, delivery, content, media/resources, and response to questions. Each criteria is scored on a scale from 0-20 points across categories of undeveloped, developing, satisfactory, and outstanding. The bottom section provides a space to record details of a chosen aircraft design for presentation.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating presentations on aircraft designs with criteria for organization, delivery, content, media/resources, and response to questions. Each criteria is scored on a scale from 0-20 points across categories of undeveloped, developing, satisfactory, and outstanding. The bottom section provides a space to record details of a chosen aircraft design for presentation.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating presentations on aircraft designs with criteria for organization, delivery, content, media/resources, and response to questions. Each criteria is scored on a scale from 0-20 points across categories of undeveloped, developing, satisfactory, and outstanding. The bottom section provides a space to record details of a chosen aircraft design for presentation.
Organization 0-5 points 6-10points 11-15points 15-20points Designer is Designer is Presentation follows Designer is highly disorganized; jumped adequately logical sequence organized, easy to topics organized follow, smooth transitions Delivery 0-5 points 6-10points 11-15points 15-20points Paper was read or Some parts of the In most instances, Speech was smooth, seemed memorized. presentation was the presentation clear and articulate. Delivery stiff and delivered well, other went smoothly. There was voice unsure parts were not. There were minor projection and pacing snags in delivery was effective. Content 0-5 points 6-10points 11-15points 15-20points Presentation was not Content was Presentation was A general audience apt to topic nor adequate. There sufficient. In most could understand the audience. Background were attempts to instances, the presentation. Key information and/or provide background content was terms were defined assumptions were information. appropriate. and background lacking. information provided. Media and 0-5 points 6-10points 11-15points 15-20points Resources Media and format were There were many Satisfactory media Excellent media poor choice for media glitches. presentation. There format for content. All content. Materials were Some slides were were however some materials were clear confusing or distracting very distracting. lapses and information was pertinent. Response to 0-5 points 6-10points 11-15points 15-20points Questions Misunderstand Some questions Designer was able to Designer was able to questions; cannot misunderstood and answer most of the answer questions well answer convincingly. inadequately questions well. There and with reference to There was a lot of addressed. Designer were occasions own work. Showed fumbling about. was easily rattled though when knowledge of subject but managed to sail designer was not too matter through confident about the subject matter. TOTAL