Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Inertia Article
Inertia Article
Student ,Department of
mathematics ,GNDU
Mathematics is a subject that is based on pure logic as well as reliable imaginations of the
masters. You must be wondering are there any times , widely accepted proves of famous
theorems went wrong and eventually got disproved . These events can mold the history and the
future of the subject . let’s throw some light on such events :
1) THEOREM :
A convergent series of a continuous functions converges to a continuous function.
f(a) exists;
limₓ → ₐ f(x) exists; [i.e., limₓ → ₐ₋ f(x) = limₓ → ₐ₊ f(x)]
Both of the above values are equal. i.e., limₓ → ₐ f(x) = f(a).
Ampere gave a proof (1806) and the claim was repeated in lots of 19th century books.
f(a) exists;
limₓ → ₐ f(x) exists; [i.e., limₓ → ₐ₋ f(x) = limₓ → ₐ₊ f(x)]
Both of the above values are equal. i.e., limₓ → ₐ f(x) = f(a).
i.e considering any continuous function , then according to the theorem it will be
differentiable at all points except some isolated points.
Let b be a real number such that 0 < b < 1 and let a be a positive odd integer. If ab > 1
and 2/ 3 > π /(ab−1 ),
then W ( x )=Σ bn cos ( a n xπ ) where n is from 0 to ∞ is continuous on R and is not
differentiable at any point in R.
3) THEOREM:
Any function could be expanded into a power series except at some isolated points
Lagrange, in the late 18th century, believed any function could be expanded into a
power series except at some isolated points and wrote an entire book on analysis based
on this assumption. (This was a time when there wasn't a modern definition of function;
it was just a "formula".) His goal was to develop analysis without using infinitesmals or
limits.
i.e considering any function we can expand it in form of power series except for some
isolated points.
CONCLUSION :
Even the mistaken work of such geniuses forms the mathematics into what it is today ,
and all we can learn is to be observant enough and not to study what’s in book without
asking a WHY?