You are on page 1of 69

1

“FACTORS AFFECTING THE DIFFICULTIES OF GRADE 6 PUPILS IN


LISTENING COMPREHENSION IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE”

DINA D. ABLI
FERLYN P. CELESTIAL
PHINELIE G. CELINO
KENT JOHN C. DEITA
RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO
SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL
MARBELYN S. LUBOS
HENDRIA C. MENDING
SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES

A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE COLLEGE OF TEACHER


EDUCATION, SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL
FULFILLMENT FOR THE COURSE REQUIREMENT IN EEDRES012 THESIS
WRITING

SEPTEMBER, 2022
2

INTRODUCTION

Listening is an important element of learning English as a foreign

language. It appears as if listening is as vital as other talents such as writing,

learning and speaking since it is the most often used ability in daily life. Even,

Gilakjani and Ahmadi (2011) highlighted that listening is important in people's

lives. It implies that people cannot learn a language without hearing it since

language is acquired through listening input. Similarly, Hien (2015) states,

listening has the ability to improve their pronunciation, word stress and syntax

acquisitions.

There are numerous challenges that learners may face during the listening

comprehension process, and the goal is to become aware and attempt to resolve

them. The significance of listening comprehension is frequently overlooked and

undervalued. Lessons tend to focus on reading and writing issues without

considering that listening comprehension is most likely the root cause of the

issues. In fact, there probably are as many factors as there are struggling

students. However, by grouping factors according to sources, you can begin to

identify where the specific factors come from and how they intertwine with each

other. The researcher focuses on the three factors that contribute to students’

difficulties related to listening material, to the listener and to speaker and physical

settings (Bingol, Celik, Yidliz, & Mart, 2014).

The teacher is the source of information and the facilitator of the class in a

classroom setting. The students' entire focus is on the teacher, and whatever the

teacher says, the students will hear. However, students may have difficulty
3

listening and have poor listening comprehension. Gilbert (2005) found that

students, like those in the K-12 program, spend around 60% to 90% of their

school time listening to their teachers and/or classmates. Also, Quijano (2012)

stated that the current Philippine education curriculum (K-12) is simultaneously

developing both the Filipino and the English language in listening and speaking.

As mentioned in the K-12 toolkit of the Department of Education (2012),

integrated language arts education at the high school level emphasizes reading

comprehension of various texts, writing and composition, study and thinking

strategies which are all in support of critical and creative thinking development

while listening is not much focused and often neglected.

Related to this research, the research was conducted by Hamouda (2013)

the study findings revealed that accent, pronunciation, speaking speed, anxiety

and poor recording quality were the issues faced by EFL Saudi students. Trisno,

Emzir and Mayuni (2019) also conducted research at university level that shows

there is a problem with listening comprehension. Based on the previous studies

that focused on issues with listening comprehension. Meanwhile, this study

examines not only the issues, but also the factors that contribute to the difficulties

with listening compression.

Philippine languages, on the other hand, have fewer consonants and

vowels than English. As a result, Filipinos struggle to produce sounds not found

in their first languages inventory, such as schwa/ and voiced consonants /z/,

/b/, /v/, and / (Ryan 2009). Errors due to this discrepancy in segmental inventory
4

are common among English second language learners, as Hassan (2014)

discovered among Sudanese students.

In this study, listening comprehension of grade six pupils in district II

Bagumbayan were described so that areas of difficulty may be identified through

survey questionnaires. Specifically, this study aimed to determine the level of

difficulty in listening comprehension of the selected grade six pupils. These

factors may be termed as listening material, listener, speaker and physical

settings.
5

Conceptual framework

INDEPENDENT DEPENDENT
VARIABLES VARIABLE

 Listening
material
 Listener ENGLISH LANGUAGE
 Speaker LISTENING
and physical COMPREHENSION
settings

Figure 1. Conceptual Framework of the study

Figure 1, shows the conceptual framework of the study which is based on

the concept that the independent variables, such as listening materials,

listener and speaker and physical settings, may affect the dependent variable

which is the English language listening comprehension of the pupils.

Statement of the Problem

This study will be conducted to determine the Factors affecting the

difficulties of pupils in listening comprehension in English language of

Bagumbayan District II for School Year 2021-2022.


6

Specifically, this study seeks to find answer to the following questions:

1. What is the level of difficulty affecting the comprehension of pupils in


English language in terms of:
1.1. Listening material;
1.2. Listener;
1.3. Speaker and physical settings;
2. What is the level of a pupil's English language listening comprehension?

3. Is there a significant difference between the factors affecting the difficulties

and the listening comprehension in English Language of Grade 6 pupils?

Hypothesis

There is no significant difference between the factors affecting the

listening comprehension and English language listening comprehension skills of

students.

Scope and Delimitation

This research study focuses on the Factors Contributing difficulties to

listening comprehension in English language of grade 6 pupils in Bagumbayan

district II. These are the schools that part of Bagumbayan District II: Bai

Sarapinang elementary, Biwang Central School, Busok Elementary, Datu Nakan

Memorial School, Kinayoa Elementary school, B. Venus elementary school,

South Sepeka elementary school, and S. Nilong elementary school. The other

pupils which do not fall as part of the study are not within the scope and

limitation. The study would be done through utilization of structured

questionnaires to the pupils as a survey or references through face-to-face.


7

Significance of the study

The result of the study would be useful and beneficial to the following:

DEPED- It can give hints to the department of education to determine the

teaching strategies and methods for the betterment of students’ learning.

School Principal- it gives clues to the principal for the educational improvement

as it is vital in developing new techniques to meet the critical educational

problems.

Teacher- this can be of great help and guidance in selecting the optimal teaching

tactics and resources for the unique learners. With the knowledge gained from

this study and its implementation in the classroom, teachers can confidently meet

the requirements of their students in the development of their listening

comprehension abilities.

Pupils- this study can help to develop pupils’ proficiency skills in listening

comprehension when the teacher integrates appropriate strategies for learners

based on the findings of this study. In terms of English language learning, the

school may provide its best support to suit students' demands for listening

comprehension.

Researchers- it can serve as their basis and guide for further study about

English teaching and learning strategies in Elementary teachers and pupils.


8

Operational Definition of terms

English language listening comprehension – refers to the latest grades of

school year 2021-2022 of Bagumbayan District II Grade 6 pupils.

Listening materials- refers to the strategies used to determine a speaker’s

intended message, for students to be able to thoughtfully respond to a speaker’s

message.

Listeners - how students give attention with the ear, especially for the purpose of

hearing specific sounds, speech, instructions,

Speaker and physical settings – refer to teachers’ strategies to enhance

students’ attitude towards listening problems such as speed of speech and length

in coherence with listening materials.


9

Chapter II

Review of Related Literature

This chapter includes the ideas, finished thesis, generalization, conclusion

and others. Those that were included in this chapter help in familiarizing

information that is relevant and similar to the present study.

THE NATURE OF THE LISTENING COMPREHENSION

The term listening is often used synonymously with the term hearing.

Although the two terms bear close relationship to each other, it is important that

we know and distinguish the differences between the two.

Funk and Wagna113 discuss the terms hearing and listening as follows:

To hear is simply to become conscious of sound, to listen is to make a

conscious effort to hear. We may hear without listening. In listening the ear is

intent upon the stand. Listening implies some attention to the meaning or import

of the sound. Between here and listen is a difference like that between the words

look and see. We may say that hearing, as one of the five senses of the human

body, requires no voluntary effort of thinking upon the part of the hearer. The

hearer becomes aware of some sound or noise that enters the ear. He may or

may not recognize the sound although it is a familiar one. If the hearer responds

to the sound and begins to attempt to determine its source and recognize it in

light of his own experiences, then he is listening. Listening involves the process
10

of thinking. In this manner, says Treamor,4 "the sense of hearing is transformed

into the art of listening (Funk and Wagna, 2020).

FACTORS AFFECT LISTENING

Factors that affect the listening process are rather difficult to evaluate.

According to science, an individual thinks four times faster than he own talk.

What then should a listener be doing with his thoughts during this extra time?

The answer to this question comes from the National Council of Teachers of

English. Listening is more than hearing. It involves following attentively the thread

of conversation, the development of an idea, the points of an argument. Like

reading, it requires comprehension in terms of the past experience of the listener

and often involves critical examinations of what is heard. We never attention

wanders, a portion of what is being presented is lost (Treamor, 2018)

The National Council of Teachers of English also has this to say about passive

listening. Speaking and writing are sometimes called the expressive phases of

language, and listening and reading the receptive ones. This does not mean that

reading and listening are more passive for the learner. In comprehending ideas

given orally or in print the learner is actively engaged in perceiving these ideas

and weighing them against his experience and in deciding upon his actions in

response to them (Treamor, 2018).

To show how time enters into response a study was made by Broadbent?

at the Medical Research Council in Cam. - bridge, England. The study was made

using navy personnel in the communications division. The findings showed that
11

when there was a short silence between questions and answers, 90% of the

answers given were correct. When the second question came before the first

was answered, 90% of the answers to the interrupted questions were correct,

and 80% of the interrupting questions were understood well enough to receive

correct answers. When one question was overlapped with a second question the

accuracy dropped to 70% (Broadbent, 2015).

The reader can vary his speed of comprehension with the difficulty of the

material. He can skim and skip familiar lines. He -can re-read if he has missed

the point. The listener has to follow the tempo of the speaker. He cannot skim,

skip or select passages that fit his needs. The. a listener's comprehension may

be affected by the speaker's enunciation, inflections, mannerisms, facial

expressions, dress, personality, or general delivery (Furness, 2014).

Any mental, emotional, or physical condition that interferes with the function

of the ear would seem to have a direct effect upon the listening efficiency of the

individual (Fessenden, 2010). Fessenden also states that "the neurological

handling of sound increases in complexity directly in proportion with the increase

in complexity of the sounds." He gives the following examples.

There is less physical effort in listening to a pure tone than to the tone of a

musical instrument. There is less physical effort in listening to a single instrument

than in listening to an orchestra. There is less physical effort in listening to words

and ideas that are easily familiar than to words and ideas that are complex and

new.
12

LEVELS OF LISTENING

Listening is a composite of activities which are physical, mental, and

emotional. The listener must first hear the spoken sounds in succession. The

sounds must be audible and intelligible. These sounds, if audible and intelligible,

are recognized as words, and through the thought process become meaningful

ideas. The ideas frequently affect the listener emotionally. If the listener is in

agreement with and subscribes to the ideas expressed, he will tend to be

pleased and receptive. If the ideas conflict with his own, he may become irritated

and reject them entirely, or he may accept them in part and incorporate them into

his existing pattern of ideas (Ibid, 2013).

Nichols and Lewis condense the levels of listening into three main types.

Appreciative listening to any kind of stimuli gratifying to the senses of the hear.

Critical listening to a persuasive speech for the purpose of evaluating the

speaker's argument and evidence. Discriminative listening to informative speech

(usually in an instructional situation) for the purpose of comprehension-- and

perhaps later utilization--of the ideas and information of the speaker. Ruth G.

Strickland, lists the seven following as developmental levels in listening: Easily

distracted by people and things in the environment. Half listening while holding

fast to own ideas and waiting to insert them at the first opportunity. Listening

passively with apparent absorption but little or no reaction. Listening, forming

associations, and responding with items from his own experience rather than

reacting to what is presented. Listening and expressing some reaction through


13

questions or comments. Listening with evidence of genuine mental and

emotional participation. Listening with a real meeting of minds.

These seven developmental levels seem to coincide with stages of growth

and development, and the ages of childhood. However, adults occasionally

regress to lower levels of listening (Strickland, 2012).

LISTENING MATERIALS

Instructors may benefit from learning by conveniently accessing various

listening resources. While obtaining listening resources is simple, there is no

assurance that they will meet students' needs or learning objects; using Text to

Speech technology to generate listening resources is one option. Text to Speech

may be a viable choice because not all listening resources are acceptable for

students' requirements and learning situations. Using the Technological,

Pedagogical, Content, Knowledge paradigm and the Google website as the

medium for delivering the listening material, this study will look into how EFL

instructors feel about using Text to Speech to create listening resources. This

study used a qualitative technique in conjunction with an individual interview style

(Yang, Rassouli, Ulfat, et al., 2022).

This learning included eight EFL instructors as participants. Numerous

efforts were taken to assess instructors' attitudes on the usage of Text to Speech

in creating listening resources. To begin, to familiarize EFL instructors with the

Text to Speech program, a computer training session was conducted; second,

instructors' prepared listening material was uploaded to a Google site for


14

distribution to students; third; finally, conferences were held to establish EFL

instructors' opinions of the Text to Speech software and Google website, and

instructors experimented with the ready listening material and Google website

feature. The results indicate that EFL instructors favor incorporating Text to

Speech programs via the TPACK paradigm. EFL instructors found this digital

technique beneficial in language acquisition (Yang, Rassouli, Ulfat, et al., 2022).

Listening to English comprehension is completely different from usual

listening activities because English is not our mother tongue language and there

are sounds which are hard to understand because the speaker uses accents and

unfamiliarity for the students that makes them fail to understand what the

speaker says. Because of that, it is very important to find out the students'

difficulties in listening comprehension to make the students succeed in listening

comprehension (Diora & Rosa, 2020).

Active listening necessitates the listener fully concentrating,

understanding, responding, and remembering what is being said. Rather than

passively receiving the speaker's message, you make a conscious effort to hear

and understand the entire message being delivered (Barnard, 2017).

Listening is an essential skill in the realm of education. We also learn

when we listen. Listening enables us to comprehend a person's feelings, actions,

and behavior, as well as their beliefs. Listening is done to comprehend the

message received (Buchal, R., & Songsore, 2019).


15

Higgins (1995) Omani students’ problems in listening comprehension and

found that the factors which facilitate or hinder listening are speech rate,

vocabulary, and pronunciation. After examining 81 Arabic speakers learning

English as a foreign language for academic purposes and their perceived LC

problems, a study conducted by Hasan (2000) shows that ‘unfamiliar words’,

‘difficult grammatical structures’, and ‘the length of the spoken text’ are the most

important message factors for listening problems. In terms of speaker factor, it

was revealed that ‘clarity’ was the main cause of EFL listening difficulties. As to

the listener factor, ‘lack of interest’ ‘the demand for full and complete answers to

listening comprehension questions’ were the two main difficulties encountered by

EFL students (Higgins,1995).

In language learning, those who can control their own listening process

can enhance their comprehension. Listening plays an intensified role while it

facilitates acquisition by gearing learners to use it as a tool for language

proficiency in any context. The skill serves the specific goals of contributing to

achieving communicative competence and activating language skills in the

learner’s own repertoire. In the past, it had been an underlying idea that listening

is the most neglected component among the four core skills used in achieving

competency in language learning. This has led some teachers to assume that

enriching listening comprehension skills in the classroom alongside the other

comprehensive language learning skills did not actually have to be considered a

priority. Furthermore, it is of great value that texts and other materials used by
16

teachers are also culturally sensitive and appropriate and/or adaptable for all

learners (Kesler, Kannan, 2019).

To ensure better learning and teaching, academic skills and content are

also connected to learners’ reference points and life experiences. The curriculum

should therefore be aligned with ethnic and cultural diversity and experiences.

Teachers should be enabled to recognize the inherent political, social, and

cultural undercurrents in all texts that constitute the curricula, since all texts (and

other learning materials) derive meaning within particular interpretive

communities (Kesler, 2011).

Speaker and physical setting

The article proposes a model for integrating TED Talks (TTs) in EFL

college listening practice. It shows instructors where TTs can be located, gives

reasons for using TTs, criteria for selecting TTs, the listening skills that can be

developed, and an instructional strategy. TTs provide a variety of real-life

themes, speakers, motivation, and inspiration. They save instructors’ time and

effort as they are available on You Tube, mobile apps or in the TED website. In

selecting TTs, the instructor should take into consideration the students'

interests, difficulty level of the TT language and content, its length in minutes,

and speed and accent of the speaker (Bsharat, Fariza, Behak 2021).

Before watching a TT, she posts the title of the TT on an LMS or social

media platform. She sets goals for listening and gives pre-questions to help the

students comprehend the TT content. The students view the TTs on their
17

smartphones in the classroom or at home; individually, in pairs, or small groups;

synchronously or asynchronously. While listening, the students take notes, and

answer the questions. After listening, they discuss their answers. The instructor

serves as a facilitator. She gives feedback, encouragement, and helps with

difficulties. Further recommendations for enhancing EFL college students’

listening skills and for extending the use of TTs to interpreting courses are given

(Bsharat, Fariza, Behak 2021).

Comprehending speech in noise is an essential cognitive skill for verbal

communication. However, it remains unclear how our brain adapts to the noisy

environment to achieve comprehension. The present study investigated the

neural mechanisms of speech comprehension in noise using a functional near-

infrared spectroscopy-based inter-brain approach. A group of speakers was

invited to tell real-life stories. The recorded speech audios were added with

meaningless white noise at four signal-to-noise levels and then played to

listeners. Results showed that speaker–listener neural couplings of listener’s left

inferior frontal gyri (IFG), that is, sensorimotor system, and right middle temporal

gyri (MTG), angular gyri (AG), that is, auditory system, were significantly higher

in listening conditions than in the baseline (Li, Z., Li, J., Hong, 2021).

More importantly, the correlation between neural coupling of listener’s left

IFG and the comprehension performance gradually became more positive with

increasing noise level, indicating an adaptive role of sensorimotor system in

noisy speech comprehension; however, the top behavioral correlations for the

coupling of listener’s right MTG and AG were only obtained in mild noise
18

conditions, indicating a different and less robust mechanism. To sum up,

speaker–listener coupling analysis provides added value and new sight to

understand the neural mechanism of speech-in-noise comprehension (Li, Z., Li,

J., Hong, 2021).

Current second language (L2) listening research has lacked detailed

accounts of L2 listeners’ difficulties comprehending texts comprising

orthographically known lexis. In the current study, 15 first language (L1)

Japanese English language learners of three English proficiency levels listened

to sentences and a narrative text. A two‐task diagnostic procedure using L1

recalls and L2 repetitions was employed to understand how orthographically

known lexis was often misinterpreted over the course of multiple listening

opportunities. Evidence from transcripts showed that the factors likely causing

listening comprehension difficulty were L1 phonological influence, English

connected speech modifications, and misinterpretation of top‐down contextual

information (Hardison, D. M., & Pennington, 2021).

The study results show that even texts comprising high‐frequency

vocabulary or other orthographically known lexis can be persistently difficult for

L2 listeners to comprehend. The results thus challenge some current

assumptions in L2 listening literature about the comprehensibility of texts with

high‐frequency vocabulary or orthographically known lexis (Hardison, D. M., &

Pennington, 2021).
19

Outcomes of conversations, including those dealing with controversial,

deeply personal, or threatening disclosures, result not only from what is said but

also from how listeners receive these messages. This article integrates the

motivational framework of self‐determination theory (SDT) and the expanding

literature on interpersonal listening to explore the reasons why high‐quality

listening is so impactful during these conversations. We describe why high‐

quality listening is a specific and distinguishable autonomy‐supportive

motivational strategy, and argue that there is much to gain by considering that

listening can satisfy basic psychological needs, in particular for autonomy and

relatedness. We argue that SDT can help explain why high‐quality listening is

effective, especially in reducing defensiveness, bridging divides, and motivating

change. The discussion focuses on ways motivation science can build more

effective interventions for behavioral (Netta Weinstein, Guy Itzchakov, Nicole

Legate, 2022).
20

Chapter III

METHODOLOGY

Research Design

The study will make use of descriptive quantitative as research design. This

type of quantitative research design is appropriate to intend to measure variables

and perhaps establish associations between variables. The factors that

contribute to the listening comprehension of grade six pupils shall be the subject.

Locale of the study

The researchers will gather information at Bagumbayan District II.

Elementary Schools in Sultan Kudarat, because the respondents of the study will

be teachers and pupils of Bai Saripinang Elementary Schools, Biwang Central

School, Busok Elementary School, Datu Nakan Memorial School, Kinayao

Elementary School, B.Venus Elementary School, South Sepaka Elementary

School and S.Nilong Elementary School.


21

Sampling technique

The researcher used probability sampling, specifically simple random

sampling, where the researcher randomly selects a subset or participants from a

population. Each member of the population has a chance of being selected.

Through the lottery method a researcher randomly picks numbers, with each

number corresponding to a student's name, in order to create the sample.

Respondents/Participants of the study

The target population of the study was Grade 6 pupils in District II of

Bagumbayan, Sultan Kudarat. The expected participants of this study were

determined by the use of Slovin’s formula. There were 2912 pupils enrolled in

Grade 6 and the expected participants were 352.

Data Gathering instruments

The questionnaires were adapted from (Hadist, Dtakiyatuddaaimah, and

Dewanti, 2022) study of listening comprehension problems. The original

questionnaire consists of three sections. First section asked about listening

material consists of 10 questions, the second section about the listener consists

of 15 questions, and the third section is about speaker and physical settings.

Several items from the original questionnaire were selected based on their

functions in serving the purpose of this study. The selected questionnaire items

were divided into three sections namely the difficulties related to listening

materials (5 items), difficulties related to listeners (5 items), and difficulties


22

related to speaker and physical setting. The questionnaire employed Likert Scale

and analyzed based on the level of adverbs of frequency that the students chose

from responses that are available. The responses were then put into percentages

and described.

Data Gathering Procedure

The researchers asked permission to conduct this study entitled “Factors

affecting the difficulties of grade six pupils in listening comprehension in English

language”. Then they prepared the research and made questionnaires for the

survey. Next, they validated their research and made questionnaires to their

subject teacher and to an English teacher. The researchers, before conducting

the study, they need to follow the health protocol that is implemented by the

Government and the Institution. They gave the research questionnaires to the

respondents which are grade six pupils of the school and let them answer the

questions through a survey. Then, the researchers conducted the study and

finally, they encoded all the given information and interpreted data.

Statistical Tools and Treatment

Statistical treatment of data is essential to make use of the data in the

right form. Raw data collection is one aspect of any experiment. The digitization

of data is equally important so that appropriate conclusions can be drawn

(Siddharta Kalla, 2009).

The collected response to questionnaire in Bagumbayan District II Grade

6 pupils run statistically analyzed with the data requirement of the study.
23

Descriptive statistics such a frequency count mean percent and rate are

considered the response answered by the Grade 6 pupils describing their

profiles, for instance, set, age, grade level, and school should be listed.

The following statistical procedure is used to interpret the data gathered from the

respondents of the study.

1. Simple percentage – The demographic profiles variables of the

respondents were analyzed using the simple percentage with the following

formula:

P=N/F(100)

Where:
P= Percentage
F= Frequency for each category
N= Total number of the respondents
100= Constant number

Profile Frequency Percentage (%)


Gender
Female 187 53.13%
Male 165 46.88%

Age group
9-10 15 4.26%
11-12 324 92.05%
12-14 13 3.69%
24

2. Likert scale

The following Likert scale serves as the guide for interpreting the data
gathered.

Scale Range- Value Verbal Interpretation


5 4.61-5.00 Always
4 3.41-4.60 Often
3 2.61-3.40 Sometimes
2 1.81-2.60 Rarely
1 1.00-1.80 Never
25

CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter contains detailed presentation and discussion of data analysis, and the

results of the study conducted.

Table 1.Level of difficulties affecting the comprehension of pupils in the English


language in terms of listening material.

Students’ Difficulties Related to Listening Material Mean Interpretation

1. Listening material not appropriate with my level of English 2.9 Sometimes


comprehension?

2.I find listening material is too hard for me in any condition? 3.0 Sometimes

3.I find difficulty in listening to long sentences or speech? 3.0 Sometimes

4.I find difficulty in comprehending unfamiliar vocabulary? 3.0 Sometimes

5.I find listening comprehension to be complex grammatical? 3.0 Sometimes

Mean 3.0 Sometimes

Table 1. shows the factor affecting students’ performance in terms of listening

material. Item numbers 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are indicated sometimes by the respondents

with the weighted means of 2.9, 3.0, 3.0, 3.0 and 3.0 respectively. It means the

respondents encountered several difficulties related to the listening material. The first

challenge is dealing with complex grammatical structures. Most students did not master

grammar because they believed it was extremely difficult. Students also had difficulty

listening because the listening text had complex grammatical structures that they did not

understand. The second challenge is understanding every single word of incoming

speech. Most students found listening difficult because they struggled to understand

every single word of the incoming speech. It means they did not master their
26

vocabulary. As a result, they found it difficult to listen to every word spoken by the

speaker because they did not know what all of the words meant. When they came

across an unknown word, they couldn't stop and think about it because doing so would

cause them to miss the next words. Furthermore, the audio only played once. The third

difficulty is interpreting the meaning of a long-spoken text. Almost all of the students

struggled to interpret the meaning of a long-spoken text. It's possible they didn't master

vocabulary. As a result, when they listen to a long-spoken text, they become tired of

hearing about it. They may also become sleepy when listening to a long-spoken text. As

can be seen, the students struggled with listening comprehension due to the speaker

and physical setting. The first issue is that poor quality tapes or disks have a negative

impact on students' ability to listen to audio. It was because low-quality tapes or disks

produced distorted audio. and the students will not understand because they are unable

to hear clearly. As a result, the lecturer must pay close attention to the quality of tapes

or disks. The second issue is inadequate equipment. Aside from the quality of the tapes

and disks, the lecturer must also pay attention to the equipment used during the

listening learning process. Sound system, headphones, microphone, and other

equipment can be found here.


27

Table 2. Level of difficulties affecting the comprehension of pupils in the English

language in terms of Listener.

Students’ Difficulties Related to Listener Mean Interpretatio


n

1.I seldom listen to English recorders throughout music and 3.0 Sometimes
video?
2.I find the pronunciation familiar but I cannot recognize the 3.0 Sometimes
word?
3.I feel anxiety during listening comprehension classes? 2.9 Sometimes
4.I feel unhappy during listening comprehension classes? 3.1 Sometimes
5. I lose my concentration when I think about the meaning of 3.1 Sometimes
new words?
3.0 Sometimes

Table 2. shows the factor affecting students’ performance in terms of listener.

Item numbers 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 have the weighted means of 3.0,3.0, 3.o, 2.9 and 3.1

respectively with description of sometimes. It means in listening comprehension, the

students encountered several difficulties related to themselves as listeners. The first

challenge is anxiety. The majority of the students are nervous before listening to the

audio. When they are anxious, they lose focus and

are unable to hear the audio clearly. As a result, the lecturer must create a fun

classroom environment and make students feel relaxed and at ease. The second

challenge is determining the meaning of unknown words. Most students are unable to

deduce the meaning of unknown words because they simply keep listening and never

consider the meaning. Because the audio only played once, it is critical for students to
28

infer the meaning of unknown words. The third issue is being unable to concentrate.

The majority of students stated that they were unable to concentrate on listening

comprehension. This issue could have occurred as a result of nearby noises. Noises

could be coming from either outside or inside the classroom. Students will be unable to

answer questions if they do not concentrate on listening. The fourth challenge is unclear

pronunciation. The majority of speakers pronounce the words differently. It's possible

that they pronounce it differently because they have different accents or dialects. As a

result, students must practice listening to a variety of accents and dialects. The fifth

difficulty is difficult to recall. Many students struggled with listening comprehension

because they found it difficult to remember. It means they quickly forgot what they just

heard. Listening requires a lot of remembering. Because the audio only played

once, the students must be able to recall what the speaker just said.

Table 3. Level of Students’ Difficulties Related to Speaker and Physical Setting

Students’ Difficulties Related to Speaker and Physical Mean Interpretatio


Setting n

1. Do I lose concentration if the recording is of poor quality? 3.2 sometimes


2. I find it difficult to understand when the speaker is too fast? 3.1 sometimes
3. I find it difficult to concentrate if there is noise around? 3.1 sometimes
4. I find it difficult if the speaker is unable to repeat the 3.2 sometimes
speech?
5. I find it difficult to understand when the speaker does not 3.3 sometimes
pause long enough?

Mean 3.2 sometimes


29

Table 3. shows the factors affecting students’ performance in terms of speaker

and physical settings. The item numbers 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 have the same description of

sometimes with weighted means of 3.2, 3.1, 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 respectively. The result,

students struggled with

listening comprehension due to the speaker and physical setting. The first issue

is that poor quality tapes or disks have a negative impact on students' ability to listen to

audio. Because of the poor quality of the tapes or disks, the students will not understand

because they cannot hear it clearly. As a result, the lecturer must pay close attention to

the quality of tapes or disks. The second issue is inadequate equipment. Aside from the

quality of the tapes and disks, the lecturer must also pay attention to the equipment

used during the listening learning process. Sound system, headphones, microphone,

and other equipment are used here. If one of those devices fails to function properly, the

students will struggle to understand what the speaker is saying. The third issue is a lack

of pauses. Most students are unable to deduce the meaning of the words because the

speaker does not pause. The speaker does not pause and the students do not

understand what he is saying. As a result, the students must pay close attention to the

speaker. The fourth challenge is the inability to be repeated. Aside from the lack of

pauses, the audio cannot be repeated. It was because it only played once and will never

be repeated. More exercises are needed for the students to understand what the

speaker said after only listening once. Noises are the fifth difficulty. Noises were really

bothering students who were learning to listen. It was due to the fact that listening
30

requires a high level of concentration. However, if there are noises, the students will be

unable to concentrate and will be unable to listen carefully. That is why the classroom

must be soundproofed so that outside noises do not disturb the students. The sixth

difficulty is a wide range of accents. The majority of the students had difficulty listening

because they did not understand the speaker's accent. Most students are accustomed

to hearing American accents, so hearing the speaker with Indian accents was difficult

for them, and they did not understand what the speaker said. The final issue is delivery

speed. The term "speed of delivery" refers to the speaker's tendency to speak too

quickly at times. There were no pauses when the speaker spoke, and the student was

unable to understand what was being said. Furthermore, the audio was only played

once, making it more difficult for the students.

Table 4.The Level of Pupil’s English Language Listening Comprehension

Area n Mean Standard Deviation


Description
Listening Comprehension 365 84.3 2.7
Satisfactory

Table 4 shows the level of Pupils’ English Language listening comprehension in

Bagumbayan District II Elementary School in terms of their first, second and third

grading grades for School Year 2021-2022. There are 365 respondents and the Mean

of their grades is 84.3. The standard deviation 2.7 shows that most of the respondents

got the grades near to 84.3 and obtains an equivalent descriptive rating of Satisfactory.
31

Table 5.Test of Significance of b using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Technique


in Linear Regression

F- tab
SV df SS MS F-comp 0.05
0.01

Due to regression 3 27.29 9.10 14.22* 8.53


26.12

Residual Error 359 232.94 0.64

TOTAL 362 260.23


: S ignificant @0.05
Table 5. flaunts the test of significance of b using Analysis of Variance
(ANOVA) Technique in Linear Regression.

As shown in the table Fcomp. = 14.22 > F(tab 0.05, df =3,359) =8.53, the null hypothesis is
rejected at a = 5% level. This means that there exists a significant relationship between
the factors affecting the difficulties in listening comprehension and the level of listening
comprehension of pupils.
32

CHAPTER V

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter concludes the study by dealing with a summary of findings,

conclusions, and recommendation of the factors affecting the difficulties of pupils

listening comprehension in English language.

RESEARCH FINDINGS

Based on the research findings obtained from the study done in different

Elementary schools among sixth grades in Bagumbayan District II, there are difficulties

that the pupils encountered in listening comprehension which includes the following:

students difficulties related to listening material, student’s difficulties related to listener,

and student’s difficulties related to speaker and physical setting.

In the student’s difficulties related to listening material, the researchers found that

students encountered difficulties with complex grammatical structures, difficult to

understand every single word of incoming speech, difficult to interpret the meaning of

long spoken text, unfamiliar topics, and new vocabularies. From the student’s difficulties

related to the listener, it’s been understood that the student’s difficulties with the listener

include anxiety, difficulty inferring the meaning of unknown words, inability to concrete,

unclear pronunciation, difficulty in remembering, losing focus, and sleepiness. The


33

results of the study also show that students struggled with listening comprehension due

to the speaker and physical setting. The first issue is that poor quality tapes or disks

have a negative impact on students’ ability to listen to audio. Because of the poor

quality of the tapes or disks, the students will not understand because they cannot hear

it clearly. Furthermore, there were six factors that contributed to student’s difficulties

with listening comprehension. They were reliant on others, ashamed to ask the speaker

about the material, had emotional disturbances, the speaker explained the material too

quickly, there was a lack of reward and reinforcement and they were unfocused.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings and discussion above, the difficulties that the students

faced in listening comprehension were related into three categories. They were related

to the listening material, the listener and the physical setting. The difficulties vary by

category. Complex grammatical structures, difficult to understand every single word of

incoming speech, difficult to interpret the meaning of long spoken text, unfamiliar topics,

and new vocabularies were student’s difficulties in listening comprehension related to

listening material. Meanwhile, student’s difficulties with the listener include anxiety,

difficulty inferring the meaning of unknown words, inability to concrete, unclear

pronunciation, difficulty in remembering, losing focus, and sleepiness. In addition, the

students encountered difficulties such as poor quality of tapes or disks, poor equipment,

lack of pauses, inability to get repeated, noises, variety of accents, and speed of

delivery. Furthermore, there were six factors that contributed to student’s difficulties with

listening comprehension. They were reliant on others, ashamed to ask the speaker
34

about the material, had emotional disturbances, the speaker explained the material too

quickly, there was a lack of reward and reinforcement and they were unfocused.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the findings and the conclusion of the research, there were some

suggestions offered. First, students must practice regularly and enrich their knowledge.

Mastery of vocabulary students could do this by listening to English songs or watching

western movies they could also learn different accents by doing songs. Second, in order

to increase student’s enthusiasm for learning listening, the speaker should devise a

good strategy for teaching listening comprehension. The speaker must also be able to

create a welcoming and enjoyable classroom environment. Finally, because this study

already discussed student difficulties with listening comprehension. The researcher

suggests that the next researcher concentrate on the other topic.


35

References:

Hadist, M. K., Hidjanah, H., Dtakiyatuddaaimah, D., & Dewanti, L. (2022). An


Analysis of EFL Students’ Difficulties in Listening Comprehension at STKIP
Muhammadiyah Bogor. Jurnal Education FKIP UNMA, 8(1), 174-179.
Siradjuddin, S., & Yahrif, M. (2021). Students' Perception of Listening Materials
at University. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics
and Literature, 9(2), 578-588.
Diora, L., & Rosa, R. N. (2020). An analysis of students’ difficulties in listening
comprehension: a descriptive study at English language and literature department fbs
unp. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(1), 85-98.
Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening
comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55-75.
Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). Learners' Listening Comprehension
Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review. English language
teaching, 9(6), 123-133.
Mulyadi, D., Wijayatiningsih, T. D., Singh, C. K. S., & Prastikawati, E. F. (2021).
Effects of Technology Enhanced Task-Based Language Teaching on Learners'
Listening Comprehension and Speaking Performance. International Journal of
Instruction, 14(3), 717-736.
El-Dakhs, D. A. S., Masrai, A., & Yahya, N. (2022). University student use and
perception of listening comprehension strategies: The case of online EMI lectures.
International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching
(IJCALLT), 12(1), 1-21.
Hikmatova, N. R., & Hakimova, H. H. (2021). THE NATURE OF LISTENING AS
AN INTERACTIVE PROCESS AND ITS APPLICATION IN THE CLASSROOM.
Scientific progress, 1(6), 1218-1224.
36

Rhidwan, S. F. (2019). STUDENTS LEARNING STRATEGIES IN LISTENING


CLASS. JELA (Journal of English Language Teaching, Literature and Applied
Linguistics), 1(1), 15-21.
Raranisa, D., Petrus, I., & Jaya, H. P. (2020). INVESTIGATING THE
DIFFICULTIES IN LISTENING COMPREHENSION ENCOUNTERED BY THE FIFTH
SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM IN
SRIWIJAYA UNIVERSITY (Doctoral dissertation, Sriwijaya University).
Saraswaty, D. R. (2018). LEARNERS DIFFICULTIES & STRATEGIES IN
LISTENING COMPREHENSION. English Community Journal, 2(1), 139-152.
Miller, L. (2003). Developing Listening Skills with Authentic Materials. ESL
magazine, 6(2), 16-18.
Wolvin, A. D., & Coakley, C. G. (1985). Listening. Wm. C. Brown Publishers,
2460 Kerper Blvd., Dubuque, IA 52001.
Jyoti, R. (2020). Exploring English language students’ difficulties in listening
comprehension. Journal La Edusci, 1(3), 1-10.
Chall, J. S., & Dial, H. E. (1948). Predicting listener understanding and interest in
newscasts. Educational Research Bulletin, 141-168.
Schneider, B. A., Avivi-Reich, M., & Daneman, M. (2016). How spoken language
comprehension is achieved by older listeners in difficult listening situations.
Experimental Aging Research, 42(1), 31-49.
Renandya, W. A. (2012, November). Materials and methods for extensive
listening. TEFLIN conference, Surabaya, Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.
academia. edu/2462863/Materials_and_Methods_for_Extensive_Listening.
Chang, A. C., Wu, B. W. P., & Pang, J. C. (2013). Second language listening
difficulties perceived by low-level learners. Perceptual and motor skills, 116(2), 415-434.
37

Appendix 1
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR TITLE DEFENSE

January 6, 2022

The Dean CTE- SKSU ACCESS City of Tacurong

Madam,

This is to inform your office that the undersigned had satisfactorily completed all
the requirements for them to present their proposal. In this connection, they would like
to apply for the title defense on January 07, 2022 via Google-meet.

Likewise, the Advisory committee was informed and had affixed their respective
signatures as shown below.

Thank you.

Very truly yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JOHN C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES

Researchers

JONALYN S. PERFECIO, MIE LEIZEL C. MERIALES, MAED


Member Member
38

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO

Research Adviser
Recommending Approval:

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MS


BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator

Approved:
NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD
Dean, College of Teacher Education
Appendix 2
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR PROPOSAL DEFENSE

February 16, 2022


NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD
Dean, College of Teacher Education

Madam,

This is to inform your office that the undersigned had satisfactorily completed all
the requirements for them to present their proposal. In this connection, they would like
to apply for the proposal defense on February 17, 2022 via Google-meet.

Likewise, the Advisory committee was informed and had affixed their respective
signatures as shown below. Thank you.

Very truly yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JOHN C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers

JONALYN S. PERFECIO, MIE LEIZEL C. MERIALES, MAED


Member Member
39

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO


Research Adviser
Recommending Approval:

ANESA P. MANGINDRA PhD RIZALYN P. CUDERA, MS


Program Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator

Approved:
NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD
College Dean
40

Appendix 3
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE STUDY


May 25, 2022
LEONARDO M. BALALA, CESE
Schools Division Superintendent
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Kenram, Isulan Sultan Kudarat

Sir,

The undersigned would like to request from your Division Office a permit to
conduct the approved study entitled “Factors Affecting the Difficulties of Grade 6 Pupils
in Listening Comprehension in English Language”

The respondents of this study are the teachers and pupils. In view of this, we are
asking your permission to allow us to conduct the study inside the school premises and
administer the said survey. Rest assured that the information to be gathered will be kept
confidential.

Thank you very much for your approval of this request.

Respectfully yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JHON C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO


Research Adviser
Recommending Approval:

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO, PhD. RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.


BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator

Approved:

NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD LEONARDO M. BALALA, CESE


Dean, College of Teacher Education Schools Division Superintendent
41

SULTAN KUDARAT STATEUNIVERSITY


College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE STUDY


May 25, 2022
AHMID D. MADALIDAY
School Head
B.Venus Elementary School
Venus, Bagumbayan, Sultan Kudarat

Sir,

The undersigned would like to request from your Division Office a permit to
conduct the approved study entitled “Factors Affecting the Difficulties of Grade 6 Pupils
in Listening Comprehension in English Language”

The respondents of this study are the teachers and pupils. In view of this, we are
asking your permission to allow us to conduct the study inside the school premises and
administer the said survey. Rest assured that the information to be gathered will be kept
confidential.

Thank you very much for your approval of this request.

Respectfully yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JHON C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers
MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO
Research Adviser
Recommending Approval:
MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO, PhD. RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.
BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator

Approved:
NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD AHMID MADALIDAY
Dean, College of Teacher Education School Head

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY


42

College of Teacher Education


ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE STUDY


May 25, 2022
VILMIN V. PORTES
Teacher In-charge
Dawing Elementary School
Upper Dawing, Bai Saripinang, Bagumbayan, Sultan Kudarat

Ma’am,

The undersigned would like to request from your Division Office a permit to
conduct the approved study entitled “Factors Affecting the Difficulties of Grade 6 Pupils
in Listening Comprehension in English Language”

The respondents of this study are the teachers and pupils. In view of this, we are
asking your permission to allow us to conduct the study inside the school premises and
administer the said survey. Rest assured that the information to be gathered will be kept
confidential.

Thank you very much for your approval of this request.

Respectfully yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JHON C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO


Research Adviser

Recommending Approval:

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO, PhD. RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.


BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator
Approved:

NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD VILMIN V. PORTES


Dean, College of Teacher Education Teacher In-Charge

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY


43

College of Teacher Education


ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE STUDY


May 25, 2022
SAMMY D. CASTRO
Teacher In-Charge
Kinayao Elementary School
Kinayao, Bagumbayan, Sultan Kudarat

Sir,

The undersigned would like to request from your Division Office a permit to
conduct the approved study entitled “Factors Affecting the Difficulties of Grade 6 Pupils
in Listening Comprehension in English Language”

The respondents of this study are the teachers and pupils. In view of this, we are
asking your permission to allow us to conduct the study inside the school premises and
administer the said survey. Rest assured that the information to be gathered will be kept
confidential.

Thank you very much for your approval of this request.

Respectfully yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JHON C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers
MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO
Research Adviser
Recommending Approval:

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO, PhD. RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.


BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator

Approved:
NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD SAMMY D. CASTRO
Dean, College of Teacher Education Teacher In-Charge
44

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY


College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE


STUDY
May 25, 2022
ANALEAH N. CANAPIT
School Principal
Bai Saripinang Elementary School
Bai Saripinang, Bagumbayan, Sultan Kudarat

Ma’am,

The undersigned would like to request from your Division Office a permit to
conduct the approved study entitled “Factors Affecting the Difficulties of Grade 6 Pupils
in Listening Comprehension in English Language”

The respondents of this study are the teachers and pupils. In view of this, we are
asking your permission to allow us to conduct the study inside the school premises and
administer the said survey. Rest assured that the information to be gathered will be kept
confidential.

Thank you very much for your approval of this request.

Respectfully yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JHON C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO


Research Adviser

Recommending Approval:

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO, PhD. RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.


BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator
Approved:
45

NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD ANALEAH N. CANAPIT


Dean, College of Teacher Education School Principal

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY


College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE STUDY


May 25, 2022
GENELYN H. MORANTE
School Principal
Biwang Central School
Biwang, Bagumbayan, Sultan Kudarat

Ma’am,

The undersigned would like to request from your Division Office a permit to
conduct the approved study entitled “Factors Affecting the Difficulties of Grade 6 Pupils
in Listening Comprehension in English Language”

The respondents of this study are the teachers and pupils. In view of this, we are
asking your permission to allow us to conduct the study inside the school premises and
administer the said survey. Rest assured that the information to be gathered will be kept
confidential.

Thank you very much for your approval of this request.

Respectfully yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JHON C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO


Research Adviser

Recommending Approval:

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO, PhD. RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.


BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator

Approved:
46

NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD GENELYN H. MORANTE


Dean, College of Teacher Education School Principal
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE STUDY


May 25, 2022
IMELDA S. FAGUTAO
School Principal
Busok Elementary School
Busok, Bagumbayan, Sultan Kudarat

Ma’am,

The undersigned would like to request from your Division Office a permit to
conduct the approved study entitled “Factors Affecting the Difficulties of Grade 6 Pupils
in Listening Comprehension in English Language”

The respondents of this study are the teachers and pupils. In view of this, we are
asking your permission to allow us to conduct the study inside the school premises and
administer the said survey. Rest assured that the information to be gathered will be kept
confidential.

Thank you very much for your approval of this request.

Respectfully yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JHON C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO


Research Adviser

Recommending Approval:

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO, PhD. RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.


BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator
47

Approved:
NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD IMELDA S. FAGUTAO
Dean, College of Teacher Education School Principal
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE STUDY


May 25, 2022
TITA F. PENUELA
School Principal
S. Nilong Elementary School
Tuka, Bagumbayan Sultan Kudarat

Ma’am,

The undersigned would like to request from your Division Office a permit to
conduct the approved study entitled “Factors Affecting the Difficulties of Grade 6 Pupils
in Listening Comprehension in English Language”

The respondents of this study are the teachers and pupils. In view of this, we are
asking your permission to allow us to conduct the study inside the school premises and
administer the said survey. Rest assured that the information to be gathered will be kept
confidential.

Thank you very much for your approval of this request.

Respectfully yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JHON C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO


Research Adviser
Recommending Approval:

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO, PhD. RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.


BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator

Approved:
48

NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD TITA F. PENUELA


Dean, College of Teacher Education School Principal
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE STUDY


May 25, 2022
WAHAB P. BAODSIG
Teacher in Charge
Datu Nakan Memorial Elementary School
Datu Nakan, Bagumbayan, Sultan Kudarat

Sir,

The undersigned would like to request from your Division Office a permit to
conduct the approved study entitled “Factors Affecting the Difficulties of Grade 6 Pupils
in Listening Comprehension in English Language”

The respondents of this study are the teachers and pupils. In view of this, we are
asking your permission to allow us to conduct the study inside the school premises and
administer the said survey. Rest assured that the information to be gathered will be kept
confidential.

Thank you very much for your approval of this request.

Respectfully yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JHON C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO


Research Adviser

Recommending Approval:

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO, PhD. RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.


BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator

Approved:
49

NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD WAHAB P. BAODSIG


Dean, College of Teacher Education Teacher in Charge
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE STUDY


May 25, 2022
ELIZABETH I. DELARMENTE
School Principal
South Sepaka Elementary School
South Sepaka, Bagumbayan, Sultan Kudarat

Ma’am,

The undersigned would like to request from your Division Office a permit to
conduct the approved study entitled “Factors Affecting the Difficulties of Grade 6 Pupils
in Listening Comprehension in English Language”
The respondents of this study are the teachers and pupils. In view of this, we are
asking your permission to allow us to conduct the study inside the school premises and
administer the said survey. Rest assured that the information to be gathered will be kept
confidential.

Thank you very much for your approval of this request.

Respectfully yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JHON C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO


Research Adviser

Recommending Approval:

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO, PhD. RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.


BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator

Approved:
50

NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD ELIZABETH I. DELAMENTE


Dean, College of Teacher Education School Principal

APPENDIX 4
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

LETTER FOR VALIDATION


Dear Ma’am,

Greetings of Peace!

We, the third-year student of Sultan Kudarat State University pursuing a degree
in Bachelor of Elementary Education, are currently working on our thesis with the title
“FACTORS CONTRIBUTE DIFFICULTIES TO LISTENING IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
OF GRADE 6 PUPILS”

We are writing to humbly request your service and expertise to serve as our
content validator for our thesis as recommended by our Research adviser. We believe
that your knowledge and insights will be valuable and will greatly enrich our work.

May this letter merit your kind consideration and approval.

Respectfully yours;

Dina D. Abli Ferlyn P. Celestial Phinelie G. Celino


Kent John G. Deita Rhemay C. Escano Salahudin T. Esmail
Marbelyn S. Lubos Hendria C. Mending

Researcher
51

RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MS
Validator

Republic of the Philippines


SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

LETTER FOR VALIDATION


Dear Ma’am,

Greetings of Peace!

We, the third-year student of Sultan Kudarat State University pursuing a degree
in Bachelor of Elementary Education, are currently working on our thesis with the title
“FACTORS CONTRIBUTE DIFFICULTIES TO LISTENING IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
OF GRADE 6 PUPILS”

We are writing to humbly request your service and expertise to serve as our
content validator for our thesis as recommended by our Research adviser. We believe
that your knowledge and insights will be valuable and will greatly enrich our work.

May this letter merit your kind consideration and approval.

Respectfully yours;

Dina D. Abli Ferlyn P. Celestial Phinelie G. Celino


Kent John G. Deita Rhemay C. Escano Salahudin T. Esmail
Marbelyn S. Lubos Hendria C. Mending

Researchers
JENEVIEVE D. LUMBU-AN, PhD
52

Validator

Republic of the Philippines


SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

LETTER FOR VALIDATION


Dear Ma’am,

Greetings of Peace!

We, the third-year student of Sultan Kudarat State University pursuing a degree
in Bachelor of Elementary Education, are currently working on our thesis with the title
“FACTORS CONTRIBUTE DIFFICULTIES TO LISTENING IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
OF GRADE 6 PUPILS”

We are writing to humbly request your service and expertise to serve as our
content validator for our thesis as recommended by our Research adviser. We believe
that your knowledge and insights will be valuable and will greatly enrich our work.

May this letter merit your kind consideration and approval.

Respectfully yours;

Dina D. Abli Ferlyn P. Celestial Phinelie G. Celino


Kent John G. Deita Rhemay C. Escano Salahudin T. Esmail
Marbelyn S. Lubos Hendria C. Mending

Researcher
JEEB T. ABELITO, MAT
53

Validator

Appendix 5
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

CERTIFICATE OF STATISTICIAN

This is to certify that the thesis entitled, “FACTORS AFFECTING THE


DIFFICULTIES OF GRADE SIX PUPILS IN LISTENING COMPREHENSION IN
ENGLISH LANGUAGE” authorized by, DINA D. ABLI, FERLYN P. CELESTIAL,
PHINELIE G. CELINO, KENT JOHN C. DEITA, RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO, SALAHUDIN
T. ESMAIL, MARBELYN S. LUBOS, HENDRIA C. MENDING and SHIELA DALE L.
TIROÑES has undergone statistician.
This certification is issued to ensure that the university received quality research
work.

Signed By:
CLYTE MADOJENOG - ESPIDA
Statistician
May 10, 2022
54

Appendix 6
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

CERTIFICATE OF GRAMMARIAN

This is to certify that the undersigned has reviewed all the pages thesis entitled,
“FACTORS AFFECTING THE DIFFICULTIES OF GRADE SIX PUPILS IN
LISTENING COMPREHENSION IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE” authorized by DINA D.
ABLI, FERLYN P. CELESTIAL, PHINELIE G. CELINO, KENT JOHN C. DEITA,
RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO, SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL, MARBELYN S. LUBOS, HENDRIA
C. MENDING and SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES aligned with the set of structural rules
that govern the composition of sentence, phrases, and words in English Language.

This certification is issued to ensure that the university received quality research
work.

Signed:

JESON A. FLORES
Grammarian
BAI SARIPINANG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Bai Saripinang, Bagumbayan, Sultan Kudarat
May 02, 2022
Date signed
55

Appendix 7
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEFENSE


July 25, 2022
NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD
Dean, College of Teacher Education

Madam,
This is to inform your office that the undersigned had satisfactorily
completed all the requirements for them to present their thesis. In this connection,
they would like to apply for the final defense on July 28, 2022 at Sultan Kudarat
State University, EJC Montilla Tacurong City.

Likewise, the Advisory committee was informed and had affixed their
respective signatures as shown below. Thank you.

Very truly yours,

DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JOHN C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers

JONALYN S. PERFECIO, MIE LEIZEL C. MERIALES, MAED


Member Member

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO


Research Adviser

Recommending Approval:

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO, PhD. RIZALYN P. CUDERA, MSc


BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator

NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD


Dean, College of Teacher Education
56

Appendix 8
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

APPLICATION FOR FINAL PRINTING AND BINDING


September 6, 2022
NANCY B. ESPACIO,EdD
Dean, College of Teacher education

Madam:

The undersigned would like to apply for FINAL PRINTING AND BINDING of the
thesis, which was successfully defended on August 31, 2022 at Sultan Kudarat State
University, EJC Montilla Tacurong City.

Likewise, the Advisory Committee approved the final draft as they affixed their
respective signatures as shown below. Thank you.

Very truly yours,


DINA D. ABLI FERLYN P. CELESTIAL PHINELIE G. CELINO

KENT JOHN C. DEITA RHEMAY C. ESCAÑO SALAHUDIN T. ESMAIL

MARBELYN S. LUBOS HENDRIA C. MENDING SHIELA DALE L. TIROÑES


Researchers

JONALYN S. PERFECIO, MIE LEIZEL C. MERIALES, MAED


Member Member
MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO
Research Adviser

Recommending Approval:

MARY GRACE O. GALLEGO, PhD RIZALYN P. CUDERAS,


MSc
BEED Chairperson CTE, Research Coordinator

NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD


Dean, College of Teacher Education
57

Appendix 8
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR STUDENTS

A. Profile of the Respondents

Direction: The following is the profile of the respondents. Please put check (/) in

every box and fill the blank that corresponds to your answer in the statements

below.

Name: (Optional)

1.1 Grade level 1 2 3

1.2 Age 6-10 11-13 14 Above

1.3 Sex Male Female

“FACTORS AFFECTING THE DIFFICULTIES OF GRADE 6 PUPILS IN LISTENING

COMPREHENSION IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE”

Direction: The following statements are the factors affecting the difficulties of grade 6

pupils in listening comprehension in English language. Please put a check (/) in every

box that responds to your answer in the statement below.

1-Never
2-Rarely
3-Sometimes
4-Often
5-Always
58

Questionnaire 1

Table 1: Students difficulties related to listening material

NO NEVE RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN ALWAYS


. QUESTIONS R
2 3 4 5
1
1. Listening
material not
appropriate with
my level of
English
comprehension?
2. I find listening
material is too
hard for my
condition?
3. I find it difficult to
listen to
sentences or
long speeches?
4. I find difficulty in
comprehending
unfamiliar
vocabulary?
5. I find listening
comprehension
has a complex
grammatical?
59

Questionnaire 2

Table 2: Students difficulties related to listener

No. NEVE RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN ALWAYS


Questions R
2 3 4 5
1

1. I seldom listen to
English recorders
throughout music and
video?
2. I find the
pronunciation familiar
but I cannot recognize
the word?
3. I feel anxiety during
listening
comprehension
classes?
4. I feel unhappy during
listening
comprehension
classes?
5. I lose concentration
when I think about the
meaning of new
words?

Questionnaire 3
60

Table 3: Students Difficulties Related to Speaker and Physical setting

NO. NEVER RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN ALWAYS


Questions
1 2 3 4 5
1. Do I lose
concentration if the
recording is poor
quality?
2. I find it difficult to
understand when the
speaker is too fast?
3. I find it difficult to
concentrate if there
are noises around?
4. I find it difficult if
unable to get
repeated?
5. I find difficult to
understand when the
speaker does not
pause long enough?

APPENDIX 9
Republic of the Philippines
61

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY


College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

RAW DATA

BUSOK NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL


Respondents
Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
R1 4 4 2 4 3 3.4 4 3 4 5 4 4 1 2 3 4 3 2.6
R2 1 2 1 4 3 2.2 4 3 1 4 4 3.2 5 5 5 5 4 4.8
R3 4 3 4 5 4 4 5 4 2 5 4 4 1 1 2 4 5 2.6
R4 4 2 3 2 1 2.4 4 4 2 4 4 3.6 4 4 2 3 4 3.4
R5 1 1 1 4 2 1.8 4 4 1 1 2 2.4 2 2 5 1 5 3
R6 4 3 4 4 4 3.8 4 4 2 4 4 3.6 4 4 3 4 4 3.8
R5 4 3 4 4 4 3.8 4 4 1 4 4 3.4 4 4 3 4 4 3.8
R7 4 3 4 4 4 3.8 2 3 4 2 4 3 4 4 2 4 4 3.6
R8 4 3 4 4 4 3.8 4 4 2 4 4 3.6 4 4 3 4 4 3.8
R9 4 3 4 1 2 2.8 2 3 4 2 4 3 4 2 4 3 1 2.8
R10 2 1 3 2 4 2.4 2 3 5 5 3 3.6 3 2 1 3 2 2.2
R11 4 4 2 1 4 3 1 4 1 2 3 2.2 4 3 5 4 5 4.2
R12 4 5 2 1 2 2.8 5 1 2 4 2 2.8 4 4 1 2 4 3
R13 4 2 4 4 5 3.8 4 4 4 1 1 2.8 2 4 3 2 3 2.8
R14 1 4 4 2 2 2.6 2 2 1 1 1 1.4 4 4 5 4 2 3.8
R15 2 1 4 2 2 2.2 4 4 1 1 4 2.8 2 4 4 2 4 3.2
R16 5 2 5 1 3 3.2 3 1 4 2 2 2.4 5 5 4 2 1 3.4
R17 2 2 2 1 1 1.6 4 3 2 5 3 3.4 1 1 3 4 2 2.2
R18 5 5 5 3 1 3.8 4 2 3 2 3 2.8 1 2 3 5 3 2.8
R19 3 3 4 2 1 2.6 1 1 3 4 2 2.2 5 1 1 5 5 3.4
R20 2 2 2 5 5 3.2 4 3 4 1 1 2.6 2 2 3 3 4 2.8
R21 3 3 1 3 1 2.2 1 3 1 4 2 2.2 4 3 1 4 4 3.2
R22 4 4 2 3 1 2.8 1 5 4 4 3 3.4 2 2 3 2 4 2.6
R23 4 4 4 4 2 3.6 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 2
R24 4 3 2 5 4 3.6 5 2 5 1 3 3.2 5 2 2 1 1 2.2
R25 5 5 1 5 3 3.8 5 2 5 4 1 3.4 4 2 5 5 2 3.6
R26 4 1 2 5 3 3 5 3 3 2 4 3.4 4 1 4 3 2 2.8
R27 2 2 1 3 3 2.2 5 2 1 2 3 2.6 4 4 2 2 5 3.4
R28 5 5 2 3 1 3.2 1 5 1 4 1 2.4 5 5 5 5 2 4.4
R29 5 5 5 5 1 4.2 1 4 4 3 4 3.2 1 3 3 4 3 2.8
R30 1 1 5 4 4 3 3 1 2 5 4 3 5 4 4 2 2 3.4
R31 4 4 2 4 2 3.2 4 4 2 4 1 3 5 2 2 5 5 3.8
R32 1 1 1 4 2 1.8 1 1 5 5 3 3 1 5 3 3 3
R33 3 3 3 5 5 3.8 1 5 1 1 5 2.6 5 3 3 2 1 2.8
R34 1 1 3 1 3 1.8 1 1 5 4 5 3.2 1 1 1 4 1 1.6
R35 1 4 4 4 5 3.6 1 5 2 2 5 3 2 1 1 2 1 1.4
R36 1 1 2 2 5 2.2 3 3 1 1 1 1.8 4 5 2 3 3 3.4
R37 3 4 4 4 1 3.2 1 4 1 4 1 2.2 5 3 3 5 1 3.4
R38 2 2 2 5 3 2.8 4 1 3 5 3 3.2 2 2 1 1 1 1.4
R39 5 5 1 1 5 3.4 1 3 2 4 2 2.4 1 4 5 3 2 3
R40 5 5 3 1 2 3.2 3 4 4 1 1 2.6 1 2 3 5 4 3
R41 3 3 4 1 1 2.4 5 3 2 2 3 3 5 1 1 3 3 2.6
R42 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 1 2 3.2 2 2 1 4 3 2.4
R43 3 4 1 1 1 2 5 2 1 4 3 3 3 2 1 3 5 2.8
R44 1 1 3 3 5 2.6 4 1 1 5 5 3.2 4 1 1 1 3 2
R45 5 5 1 1 5 3.4 1 3 3 2 4 2.6 1 5 1 4 2 2.6
R46 3 3 4 3 3 3.2 2 4 3 5 1 3 5 5 4 3 4 4.2
R47 3 4 4 2 1 2.8 5 3 4 5 2 3.8 5 5 5 4 3 4.4
R48 1 1 4 2 3 2.2 1 3 4 2 2 2.4 4 3 5 4 5 4.2
R49 3 3 3 2 4 3 1 3 5 2 3 2.8 5 4 1 4 5 3.8
R50 3 2 4 3 1 2.6 3 2 1 3 3 2.4 4 3 5 3 5 4
R51 4 5 1 1 1 2.4 2 4 5 3 4 3.6 4 3 5 5 5 4.4
R52 1 1 2 3 4 2.2 1 3 1 1 4 2 3 3 5 5 4 4
mean 3.132075 2.981132 2.981132 2.90566 2.849057 2.969811321 2.924528 3 2.615385 3.018868 2.924528 2.898113 3.320755 2.867925 2.943396 3.339623 3.245283 3.143396

grand mean2.969811 grand mean2.896662 grand mean3.143396


62

Kinayao Elementary School


Respondents Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
R100 1 2 3 4 5 3 1 2 3 4 5 3 1 2 3 4 5 3
R101 5 4 3 4 4 4 5 3 3 1 2 2.8 2 3 4 3 3 3
R102 3 4 1 4 4 3.2 1 4 5 5 4 3.8 3 4 3 1 1 2.4
R103 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 3.2 4 4 3 3 3 3.4
R104 4 4 4 3 2 3.4 5 4 4 5 4 4.4 4 4 5 3 3 3.8
R105 5 4 4 3 2 3.6 5 3 1 1 2 2.4 3 3 4 2 2 2.8
R106 1 2 1 4 1 1.8 4 2 3 5 2 3.2 5 1 2 4 5 3.4
R107 2 3 4 3 4 3.2 3 4 2 2 2 2.6 3 4 3 3 4 3.4
R108 3 4 3 3 4 3.4 3 4 2 2 3 2.8 3 4 5 3 4 3.8
R109 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 2 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 3.6
R110 3 2 2 3 1 2.2 3 4 2 2 2 2.6 4 3 5 3 4 3.8
R111 3 1 5 5 5 3.8 5 1 5 1 5 3.4 1 4 1 1 1 1.6
R112 4 2 5 1 5 3.4 5 1 3 5 4 3.6 5 1 1 3 2 2.4
R113 4 5 3 4 4 4 5 5 4 1 4 3.8 4 2 2 4 4 3.2
R114 1 3 4 5 5 3.6 5 5 3 1 1 3 5 5 1 2 1 2.8
R115 3 3 5 5 5 4.2 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 1 1 1 1 1.4
R116 1 1 2 1 1 1.2 4 5 3 2 3 3.4 3 1 1 2 3 2
R117 3 3 5 4 4 3.8 1 4 1 1 4 2.2 3 3 1 2 2 2.2
R118 1 4 4 3 2 2.8 2 1 5 5 5 3.6 2 1 1 3 3 2
R119 5 5 3 1 2 3.2 1 3 1 5 1 2.2 5 4 4 1 1 3
R120 1 1 3 5 1 2.2 1 1 5 3 2 2.4 2 2 5 5 5 3.8
R121 5 5 2 2 1 3 2 5 5 1 1 2.8 1 4 1 1 1 1.6
R122 3 3 4 3 4 3.4 3 2 4 2 4 3 3 2 2 4 5 3.2
R123 2 3 5 3 4 3.4 4 4 2 3 4 3.4 5 2 1 2 3 2.6
R124 3 2 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 5 2 3.8 3 2 3 3 5 3.2
R125 5 3 4 2 4 3.6 3 4 2 1 4 2.8 3 4 2 4 4 3.4
R126 2 4 2 3 2 2.6 4 3 4 2 5 3.6 3 1 4 2 2 2.4
R127 3 4 3 5 1 3.2 2 4 4 2 4 3.2 3 2 4 2 4 3
R128 2 4 2 4 2 2.8 2 4 2 4 2 2.8 4 5 3 4 3 3.8
R129 1 3 2 3 2 2.2 4 5 2 4 4 3.8 3 2 4 5 3 3.4
R130 4 2 4 5 4 3.8 5 2 1 4 4 3.2 3 4 4 1 5 3.4
R131 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 3 2 5 2 3.2 2 3 3 2 4 2.8
R132 5 4 5 5 4 4.6 5 4 3 3 2 3.4 3 2 2 3 5 3
R133 4 5 5 3 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 3 4 2 3 2 3 2.8
R134 5 2 4 2 4 3.4 5 4 1 4 4 3.6 3 3 4 1 2 2.6
R135 3 3 4 3 5 3.6 4 5 1 4 3 3.4 2 4 3 2 4 3
R136 4 1 3 4 4 3.2 5 4 2 3 4 3.6 3 2 2 3 5 3
R137 2 3 5 3 3 3.2 4 3 3 4 5 3.8 4 3 3 4 3 3.4
R138 4 4 4 4 2 3.6 5 2 3 5 4 3.8 5 4 4 4 4 4.2
R139 4 2 5 2 3 3.2 4 3 3 3 3 3.2 4 4 3 3 5 3.8
R140 5 3 4 1 4 3.4 5 4 4 4 2 3.8 3 3 2 3 4 3
R141 4 4 5 2 5 4 3 5 5 5 3 4.2 2 2 3 4 3 2.8
R142 5 3 4 3 3 3.6 5 3 5 4 4 4.2 3 4 4 5 2 3.6
R143 3 2 5 4 3 3.4 3 3 5 3 4 3.6 4 4 5 2 5 4
R144 5 3 4 3 4 3.8 2 4 5 4 4 3.8 5 5 1 4 4 3.8
R145 4 4 6 2 5 4.2 4 5 4 5 5 4.6 3 5 1 2 3 2.8
3.26087 3.108696 3.673913 3.304348 3.304348 3.586957 3.478261 3.130435 3.217391 3.326087 3.23913 3 2.826087 2.782609 3.304348
3.330435 3.347826 3.030435
63

Bai Sarapinang Elementary School


Respondents Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
R146 1 2 3 4 5 3 1 2 3 4 5 3 1 2 3 4 5 3
R147 4 4 5 1 2 3.2 5 5 5 1 5 4.2 1 2 2 5 4 2.8
R148 4 4 5 4 2 3.8 5 5 4 1 5 4 2 2 4 4 5 3.4
R149 4 3 5 5 5 4.4 5 1 1 1 5 2.6 2 1 5 5 1 2.8
R150 1 4 5 4 5 3.8 1 3 1 1 5 2.2 1 1 1 5 5 2.6
R151 3 5 4 5 5 4.4 5 3 5 5 5 4.6 4 1 1 1 5 2.4
R152 5 4 5 4 4 4.4 4 4 4 4 5 4.2 5 1 5 4 4 3.8
R153 4 3 4 4 4 3.8 4 4 3 1 1 2.6 4 4 3 4 1 3.2
R154 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 3 3 3.8 3 4 5 3 4 3.8
R155 1 2 1 5 3 2.4 1 3 2 5 4 3 3 5 1 2 3 2.8
R156 1 5 1 5 5 3.4 5 4 2 1 5 3.4 1 1 5 5 5 3.4
R157 4 2 5 3 1 3 4 2 3 5 5 3.8 3 5 4 1 2 3
R158 2 4 2 2 2 2.4 1 2 4 1 4 2.4 1 1 4 1 1 1.6
R159 1 2 4 1 3 2.2 5 1 4 2 1 2.6 5 1 1 5 1 2.6
R160 2 1 3 4 2 2.4 5 4 3 1 1 2.8 4 4 4 2 3 3.4
R161 4 4 1 1 4 2.8 4 1 1 4 4 2.8 1 4 1 1 4 2.2
R162 2 4 4 2 4 3.2 5 2 1 4 2 2.8 4 1 1 2 4 2.4
R163 4 2 1 2 1 2 1 4 1 4 1 2.2 4 1 2 2 4 2.6
R164 1 2 4 4 2 2.6 5 2 3 4 1 3 2 2 4 2 4 2.8
R165 2 2 5 1 2 2.4 4 2 4 2 1 2.6 1 2 4 2 5 2.8
R166 1 2 4 2 4 2.6 2 1 2 4 2 2.2 3 2 1 3 5 2.8
R167 1 4 2 1 3 2.2 1 1 3 3 1 1.8 2 1 3 2 2 2
R168 5 4 2 2 3 3.2 4 1 3 3 2 2.6 4 1 5 2 1 2.6
R169 3 3 1 3 1 2.2 3 1 3 1 3 2.2 2 1 2 2 1 1.6
R170 5 1 3 2 3 2.8 3 2 4 2 2 2.6 2 4 2 3 2 2.6
R171 3 4 4 1 4 3.2 2 4 2 3 4 3 2 3 3 4 1 2.6
R172 3 3 1 4 5 3.2 2 2 4 2 4 2.8 1 4 2 4 2 2.6
R173 1 1 2 4 2 2 4 2 4 1 4 3 1 3 2 4 2 2.4
R174 4 2 4 2 5 3.4 5 1 2 3 4 3 4 2 2 2 1 2.2
R175 1 5 1 2 4 2.6 2 2 2 4 2 2.4 4 2 4 3 1 2.8
R176 3 3 5 2 5 3.6 2 4 5 2 2 3 3 1 3 2 4 2.6
R177 2 5 1 3 1 2.4 1 3 1 1 3 1.8 1 3 2 4 3 2.6
R178 4 2 4 5 3 3.6 4 2 3 1 4 2.8 2 5 2 3 1 2.6
R179 1 2 4 1 4 2.4 2 1 3 2 1 1.8 2 2 4 2 1 2.2
R180 5 2 4 2 3 3.2 2 2 4 3 1 2.4 4 2 4 1 4 3
R181 1 1 1 2 3 1.6 1 4 2 1 3 2.2 2 1 4 2 3 2.4
R182 2 4 2 1 4 2.6 2 5 5 2 2 3.2 4 2 3 4 1 2.8
R183 5 4 3 4 3 3.8 2 2 2 3 4 2.6 1 4 2 4 4 3
R184 3 4 5 1 5 3.6 5 5 2 2 4 3.6 2 2 4 2 4 2.8
R185 2 6 4 4 2 3.6 4 3 4 4 4 3.8 2 2 2 2 4 2.4
R186 4 2 4 3 5 3.6 3 4 2 5 1 3 1 2 3 3 2 2.2
R187 3 1 2 4 2 2.4 4 2 3 2 1 2.4 4 3 2 4 2 3
R188 4 2 4 4 2 3.2 2 4 2 2 2 2.4 3 1 3 2 4 2.6
R189 5 1 2 2 5 3 2 4 2 3 2 2.6 4 2 3 2 2 2.6
R190 2 4 2 3 4 3 5 3 3 1 2 2.8 4 2 1 4 5 3.2
R191 4 2 1 3 1 2.2 3 1 3 4 3 2.8 3 4 3 4 4 3.6
R192 3 1 1 4 1 2 1 2 2 5 1 2.2 5 5 3 3 5 4.2
R193 3 3 2 1 3 2.4 4 2 4 5 2 3.4 5 4 2 5 5 4.2
R194 1 1 3 2 1 1.6 1 4 2 4 3 2.8 5 3 4 5 4 4.2
R195 2 4 3 2 5 3.2 3 4 5 2 5 3.8 5 3 5 5 5 4.6
R196 2 2 4 3 1 2.4 1 5 2 3 4 3 3 5 5 5 1 3.8
R197 2 4 1 1 1 1.8 4 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 1.4
R198 2 0 3 1 1 1.4 3 2 5 2 4 3.2 2 1 4 3 5 3
R199 4 2 3 1 5 3 3 5 2 3 4 3.4 5 5 2 5 1 3.6
R200 2 2 2 2 3 2.2 1 2 1 3 2 1.8 5 4 2 4 2 3.4
R201 3 4 1 3 2 2.6 3 3 3 4 4 3.4 4 5 5 5 4 4.6
R202 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1.4 2 1 1 2 2 1.6
R203 4 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 5 5 3 3.6 4 4 4 5 4 4.2
R204 1 4 4 1 3 2.6 2 1 2 3 2 2 3 5 4 5 5 4.4
R205 3 3 2 4 2 2.8 1 3 2 2 4 2.4 3 5 5 3 4 4
R206 2 1 1 3 1 1.6 2 4 2 3 2 2.6 2 4 2 3 4 3
R207 3 2 1 3 2 2.2 1 3 2 4 2 2.4 1 3 2 3 3 2.4
R208 3 2 3 1 2 2.2 4 2 2 3 2 2.6 3 4 5 5 5 4.4
R209 3 3 2 4 2 2.8 2 3 1 2 3 2.2 5 4 2 4 4 3.8
R210 3 3 1 2 2 2.2 3 2 2 2 3 2.4 5 5 5 2 3 4
R211 4 1 1 2 1 1.8 3 3 4 2 3 3 4 5 3 4 4 4
R212 4 2 4 3 1 2.8 1 2 4 3 4 2.8 5 5 5 4 3 4.4
R213 3 2 1 3 2 2.2 3 4 5 2 3 3.4 2 5 5 4 4 4
R214 3 2 3 4 2 2.8 3 4 3 4 5 3.8 4 5 5 5 2 4.2
R215 5 5 4 4 1 3.8 1 3 2 4 5 3 5 4 3 4 5 4.2
R216 1 1 2 1 3 1.6 2 4 4 2 3 3 4 4 5 3 5 4.2
R217 5 3 4 2 4 3.6 2 4 2 5 3 3.2 5 5 4 2 3 3.8
R218 3 1 3 2 4 2.6 2 3 3 2 4 2.8 2 1 2 3 3 2.2
R219 2 1 3 2 3 2.2 4 2 3 4 4 3.4 2 3 5 5 5 4
R220 2 2 5 1 3 2.6 2 4 3 3 4 3.2 3 4 4 4 3 3.6
R221 3 4 3 2 1 2.6 3 4 3 1 2 2.6 3 3 4 4 3 3.4
R222 2 5 4 2 3 3.2 1 2 4 2 3 2.4 5 5 3 5 5 4.6
R223 1 5 5 1 3 3 5 5 1 5 3 3.8 3 2 2 5 5 3.4
2.769231 2.75641 2.884615 2.602564 2.871795 2.833333 2.833333 2.833333 2.74359 3.012821 3 2.923077 3.128205 3.320513 3.269231
2.776923 2.851282 3.128205
64

BUSOK NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL


Respondents
Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
R1 4 4 2 4 3 3.4 4 3 4 5 4 4 1 2 3 4 3 2.6
R2 1 2 1 4 3 2.2 4 3 1 4 4 3.2 5 5 5 5 4 4.8
R3 4 3 4 5 4 4 5 4 2 5 4 4 1 1 2 4 5 2.6
R4 4 2 3 2 1 2.4 4 4 2 4 4 3.6 4 4 2 3 4 3.4
R5 1 1 1 4 2 1.8 4 4 1 1 2 2.4 2 2 5 1 5 3
R6 4 3 4 4 4 3.8 4 4 2 4 4 3.6 4 4 3 4 4 3.8
R5 4 3 4 4 4 3.8 4 4 1 4 4 3.4 4 4 3 4 4 3.8
R7 4 3 4 4 4 3.8 2 3 4 2 4 3 4 4 2 4 4 3.6
R8 4 3 4 4 4 3.8 4 4 2 4 4 3.6 4 4 3 4 4 3.8
R9 4 3 4 1 2 2.8 2 3 4 2 4 3 4 2 4 3 1 2.8
R10 2 1 3 2 4 2.4 2 3 5 5 3 3.6 3 2 1 3 2 2.2
R11 4 4 2 1 4 3 1 4 1 2 3 2.2 4 3 5 4 5 4.2
R12 4 5 2 1 2 2.8 5 1 2 4 2 2.8 4 4 1 2 4 3
R13 4 2 4 4 5 3.8 4 4 4 1 1 2.8 2 4 3 2 3 2.8
R14 1 4 4 2 2 2.6 2 2 1 1 1 1.4 4 4 5 4 2 3.8
R15 2 1 4 2 2 2.2 4 4 1 1 4 2.8 2 4 4 2 4 3.2
R16 5 2 5 1 3 3.2 3 1 4 2 2 2.4 5 5 4 2 1 3.4
R17 2 2 2 1 1 1.6 4 3 2 5 3 3.4 1 1 3 4 2 2.2
R18 5 5 5 3 1 3.8 4 2 3 2 3 2.8 1 2 3 5 3 2.8
R19 3 3 4 2 1 2.6 1 1 3 4 2 2.2 5 1 1 5 5 3.4
R20 2 2 2 5 5 3.2 4 3 4 1 1 2.6 2 2 3 3 4 2.8
R21 3 3 1 3 1 2.2 1 3 1 4 2 2.2 4 3 1 4 4 3.2
R22 4 4 2 3 1 2.8 1 5 4 4 3 3.4 2 2 3 2 4 2.6
R23 4 4 4 4 2 3.6 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 2
R24 4 3 2 5 4 3.6 5 2 5 1 3 3.2 5 2 2 1 1 2.2
R25 5 5 1 5 3 3.8 5 2 5 4 1 3.4 4 2 5 5 2 3.6
R26 4 1 2 5 3 3 5 3 3 2 4 3.4 4 1 4 3 2 2.8
R27 2 2 1 3 3 2.2 5 2 1 2 3 2.6 4 4 2 2 5 3.4
R28 5 5 2 3 1 3.2 1 5 1 4 1 2.4 5 5 5 5 2 4.4
R29 5 5 5 5 1 4.2 1 4 4 3 4 3.2 1 3 3 4 3 2.8
R30 1 1 5 4 4 3 3 1 2 5 4 3 5 4 4 2 2 3.4
R31 4 4 2 4 2 3.2 4 4 2 4 1 3 5 2 2 5 5 3.8
R32 1 1 1 4 2 1.8 1 1 5 5 3 3 1 5 3 3 3
R33 3 3 3 5 5 3.8 1 5 1 1 5 2.6 5 3 3 2 1 2.8
R34 1 1 3 1 3 1.8 1 1 5 4 5 3.2 1 1 1 4 1 1.6
R35 1 4 4 4 5 3.6 1 5 2 2 5 3 2 1 1 2 1 1.4
R36 1 1 2 2 5 2.2 3 3 1 1 1 1.8 4 5 2 3 3 3.4
R37 3 4 4 4 1 3.2 1 4 1 4 1 2.2 5 3 3 5 1 3.4
R38 2 2 2 5 3 2.8 4 1 3 5 3 3.2 2 2 1 1 1 1.4
R39 5 5 1 1 5 3.4 1 3 2 4 2 2.4 1 4 5 3 2 3
R40 5 5 3 1 2 3.2 3 4 4 1 1 2.6 1 2 3 5 4 3
R41 3 3 4 1 1 2.4 5 3 2 2 3 3 5 1 1 3 3 2.6
R42 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 1 2 3.2 2 2 1 4 3 2.4
R43 3 4 1 1 1 2 5 2 1 4 3 3 3 2 1 3 5 2.8
R44 1 1 3 3 5 2.6 4 1 1 5 5 3.2 4 1 1 1 3 2
R45 5 5 1 1 5 3.4 1 3 3 2 4 2.6 1 5 1 4 2 2.6
R46 3 3 4 3 3 3.2 2 4 3 5 1 3 5 5 4 3 4 4.2
R47 3 4 4 2 1 2.8 5 3 4 5 2 3.8 5 5 5 4 3 4.4
R48 1 1 4 2 3 2.2 1 3 4 2 2 2.4 4 3 5 4 5 4.2
R49 3 3 3 2 4 3 1 3 5 2 3 2.8 5 4 1 4 5 3.8
R50 3 2 4 3 1 2.6 3 2 1 3 3 2.4 4 3 5 3 5 4
R51 4 5 1 1 1 2.4 2 4 5 3 4 3.6 4 3 5 5 5 4.4
R52 1 1 2 3 4 2.2 1 3 1 1 4 2 3 3 5 5 4 4
mean 3.132075 2.981132 2.981132 2.90566 2.849057 2.969811321 2.924528 3 2.615385 3.018868 2.924528 2.898113 3.320755 2.867925 2.943396 3.339623 3.245283 3.143396

grand mean2.969811 grand mean2.896662 grand mean3.143396


65

Biwang Central School


Respondents Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
R224 1 2 3 4 5 3 1 2 3 4 5 3 1 2 3 4 5 3
R225 1 1 1 4 2 1.8 4 1 4 5 4 3.6 3 4 1 3 4 3
R226 4 3 4 2 4 3.4 4 4 3 1 4 3.2 4 5 4 4 4 4.2
R227 3 2 4 4 5 3.6 4 4 4 1 3 3.2 2 3 5 4 1 3
R228 1 3 3 5 5 3.4 4 3 1 3 3 2.8 2 4 3 4 5 3.6
R229 4 4 3 2 4 3.4 3 3 4 4 5 3.8 3 4 3 4 5 3.8
R230 3 3 4 4 4 3.6 3 4 4 4 3 3.6 5 4 3 4 4 4
R231 4 3 4 4 4 3.8 4 2 3 2 3 2.8 4 4 3 5 4 4
R232 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 3 3 3.8 3 4 5 2 3 3.4
R233 3 4 1 4 3 3 1 3 3 5 4 3.2 3 5 1 2 3 2.8
R234 3 4 3 2 1 2.6 4 4 4 1 5 3.6 1 4 3 1 4 2.6
R235 4 2 5 1 4 3.2 4 2 4 1 5 3.2 4 2 4 4 3 3.4
R236 3 4 4 4 4 3.8 4 2 4 3 5 3.6 3 4 2 1 4 2.8
R237 2 2 4 3 4 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 3 4 3 5 4 3.8
R238 3 2 4 4 4 3.4 5 4 4 3 5 4.2 4 5 4 1 3 3.4
R239 5 4 1 4 5 3.8 1 4 1 1 4 2.2 2 2 2 4 1 2.2
R240 2 3 4 1 3 2.6 5 2 3 3 5 3.6 3 2 1 2 5 2.6
R241 1 1 5 2 3 2.4 4 2 5 3 1 3 4 1 2 3 3 2.6
R242 2 3 3 5 4 3.4 1 3 3 4 5 3.2 4 2 2 5 5 3.6
R243 5 3 3 4 4 3.8 2 2 4 5 3 3.2 2 5 1 4 3 3
R244 3 3 4 1 2 2.6 2 3 5 1 3 2.8 5 3 5 2 5 4
R245 4 2 3 1 2 2.4 3 5 2 5 4 3.8 1 5 2 4 3 3
R246 5 5 4 2 5 4.2 4 3 3 2 1 2.6 5 3 5 5 1 3.8
R247 1 4 4 5 2 3.2 3 3 5 4 4 3.8 5 4 4 3 2 3.6
R248 3 3 2 2 2 2.4 5 5 2 4 5 4.2 3 5 4 5 5 4.4
R249 4 4 3 3 3 3.4 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 4 1 5 3.4
R250 5 5 3 4 3 4 5 2 3 3 5 3.6 5 5 3 4 4 4.2
R251 3 4 5 4 4 4 2 2 1 3 2 2 5 3 2 3 3 3.2
R252 3 3 2 5 5 3.6 2 1 5 5 4 3.4 3 2 1 2 2 2
R253 5 3 2 4 4 3.6 5 2 2 3 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 4.4
R254 4 4 5 3 3 3.8 3 3 4 5 2 3.4 5 2 3 3 5 3.6
R255 5 2 4 5 3 3.8 3 2 3 5 1 2.8 1 2 5 4 3 3
R256 3 3 2 4 4 3.2 5 5 1 1 4 3.2 5 5 4 3 3 4
R257 5 5 5 1 2 3.6 4 4 3 5 2 3.6 4 3 3 3 5 3.6
R258 3 3 4 4 1 3 2 3 2 4 4 3 5 2 4 3 3 3.4
R259 4 3 2 2 1 2.4 4 4 5 2 3 3.6 3 4 4 5 5 4.2
R260 5 5 3 2 5 4 5 2 2 5 2 3.2 4 5 3 2 2 3.2
R261 2 2 3 4 4 3 5 3 2 5 5 4 2 1 4 4 3 2.8
R262 2 1 1 4 3 2.2 5 4 4 3 2 3.6 3 3 5 5 5 4.2
R263 3 4 5 5 3 4 3 1 5 5 3 3.4 2 4 3 3 5 3.4
R264 2 2 4 3 1 2.4 1 5 4 4 2 3.2 5 5 5 5 5 5
R265 3 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1.4 4 5 3 3 4 3.8
R266 3 3 5 4 1 3.2 5 1 5 4 3 3.6 3 3 1 2 5 2.8
R267 5 5 3 1 5 3.8 4 5 1 2 4 3.2 5 3 3 3 5 3.8
R268 4 4 1 5 4 3.6 2 3 3 3 5 3.2 1 2 4 4 3 2.8
R269 2 3 4 2 2 2.6 3 4 4 1 5 3.4 4 4 5 3 5 4.2
R270 2 3 2 3 4 2.8 1 2 3 2 4 2.4 2 3 4 4 5 3.6
R271 1 1 3 5 3 2.6 2 4 2 4 3 3 5 5 3 4 3 4
R272 2 4 3 1 1 2.2 3 2 3 5 4 3.4 3 4 5 5 5 4.4
R273 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
R274 2 4 3 2 3 2.8 2 4 3 4 4 3.4 2 4 5 5 3 3.8
R275 2 2 3 2 2 2.2 3 4 4 3 3 3.4 5 3 4 3 5 4
R276 2 1 2 3 1 1.8 1 2 1 1 2 1.4 3 4 2 3 2 2.8
R277 1 4 2 2 2 2.2 3 2 3 2 5 3 5 4 2 2 5 3.6
R278 1 2 1 1 1 1.2 3 1 4 1 3 2.4 3 2 3 2 3 2.6
R279 2 2 2 3 4 2.6 3 3 4 3 4 3.4 4 5 3 5 5 4.4
R280 3 4 2 4 3 3.2 4 3 2 2 4 3 2 3 2 2 5 2.8
R281 3 2 1 3 2 2.2 4 3 2 3 2 2.8 3 4 5 5 2 3.8
R282 2 3 1 2 3 2.2 4 4 5 2 3 3.6 5 5 2 4 5 4.2
R283 2 4 3 2 3 2.8 1 3 2 4 3 2.6 5 5 3 3 5 4.2
R284 2 1 3 4 2 2.4 4 2 2 4 2 2.8 3 5 3 5 5 4.2
R285 3 2 2 3 2 2.4 4 2 3 1 3 2.6 4 3 5 5 3 4
R286 3 2 4 2 2 2.6 2 3 4 2 3 2.8 3 3 3 3 3 3
R287 1 4 2 3 1 2.2 2 2 3 2 4 2.6 5 5 5 2 4 4.2
R288 5 2 5 2 3 3.4 1 2 3 1 4 2.2 5 1 3 4 2 3
R289 4 3 2 2 3 2.8 2 2 3 2 3 2.4 4 5 5 5 2 4.2
R290 1 3 1 3 4 2.4 2 3 3 3 2 2.6 3 4 2 4 4 3.4
R291 2 3 2 4 2 2.6 3 1 3 4 2 2.6 3 5 4 5 5 4.4
MEAN 2.882353 2.941176 2.970588 3.029412 3 3.102941 2.823529 3.102941 3 3.352941 3.455882 3.588235 3.264706 3.455882 3.75
GRAND MEAN 2.964706 3.076471 3.502941
66

B. Venus Elementary School


Respondents Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
R318 1 2 1 3 2 1.8 3 3 2 1 3 2.4 5 4 4 2 3 3.6
R319 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 4 1 1 4 2.4 4 5 4 3 3 3.8
R32O 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 4 1 2 3 2.4 4 4 3 4 3 3.6
R321 3 2 2 2 3 2.4 1 3 2 1 4 2.2 5 3 4 3 4 3.8
R322 1 3 1 3 2 2 2 4 1 1 3 2.2 4 3 5 2 4 3.6
R323 2 3 1 2 3 2.2 4 4 2 1 3 2.8 5 3 5 4 5 4.4
R324 1 2 2 2 4 2.2 2 3 2 2 3 2.4 3 5 5 2 3 3.6
R325 1 4 1 3 3 2.4 1 4 2 2 4 2.6 4 4 3 3 4 3.6
R326 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 4 2 4 3 3 4 5 4 3 4 4
R327 2 3 3 2 2 2.4 1 3 1 2 4 2.2 4 4 5 4 2 3.8
R328 2 1 4 1 3 2.2 3 2 1 2 1 1.8 5 4 4 2 3 3.6
R329 3 1 1 1 4 2 2 5 3 1 1 2.4 3 3 4 4 5 3.8
R330 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 4 2 3 2 2.6 5 2 5 3 5 4
R331 1 1 3 3 2 2 3 5 2 1 3 2.8 4 4 5 3 5 4.2
R332 3 3 2 4 1 2.6 1 2 1 2 2 1.6 3 5 4 3 5 4
R333 2 2 4 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 4 2.2 5 4 4 4 3 4
R334 1 1 2 3 2 1.8 4 5 1 3 4 3.4 5 3 5 4 4 4.2
MEAN 1.823529 2.117647 2 2.352941 2.294118 2.176471 3.588235 1.588235 1.823529 3 4.235294 3.823529 4.294118 3.117647 3.823529
GRAND MEAN 2.117647 2.435294 3.858824

South Sepaka Elementary School


Respondents Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
R293 4 5 1 3 3 3.2 4 3 3 2 4 3.2 4 2 3 2 3 2.8
R294 2 5 4 4 1 3.2 2 1 5 1 2 2.2 5 1 5 1 5 3.4
R295 3 3 2 5 1 2.8 1 4 4 4 5 3.6 5 4 2 3 4 3.6
R296 5 1 1 2 1 2 5 5 2 5 3 4 2 1 1 4 2 2
R297 2 4 5 3 4 3.6 4 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 5 1 2.6
R298 2 2 1 2 2 1.8 3 4 3 2 1 2.6 1 3 4 2 2 2.4
R299 1 1 2 1 5 2 2 2 5 4 3 3.2 3 2 1 1 3 2
R300 4 1 3 2 3 2.6 5 1 4 5 4 3.8 2 1 2 1 4 2
R301 4 3 4 3 1 3 1 4 2 3 5 3 4 3 3 3 4 3.4
R302 5 2 4 1 2 2.8 1 5 1 2 1 2 5 2 4 4 1 3.2
R303 4 4 5 1 4 3.6 2 2 2 1 2 1.8 2 3 5 5 3 3.6
R304 3 5 1 5 5 3.8 3 1 4 4 1 2.6 3 4 5 5 4 4.2
R305 2 1 5 3 3 2.8 3 4 3 5 4 3.8 5 5 3 3 5 4.2
R306 1 4 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 3 1 3.2 1 5 2 3 2 2.6
R307 3 2 4 2 2 2.6 1 5 1 2 2 2.2 4 2 1 3 1 2.2
R308 2 3 3 2 3 2.6 4 2 2 1 3 2.4 2 1 4 2 3 2.4
R309 5 3 2 2 1 2.6 2 5 3 4 2 3.2 1 4 1 1 4 2.2
R310 4 2 4 4 3 3.4 1 5 4 4 4 3.6 3 3 3 2 1 2.4
R311 3 1 1 4 1 2 5 3 4 4 5 4.2 4 3 3 4 3 3.4
R312 1 4 4 2 3 2.8 5 1 1 1 1 1.8 1 1 1 5 4 2.4
R313 2 5 5 2 2 3.2 4 2 2 1 2 2.2 3 2 1 3 2 2.2
R314 5 3 1 2 4 3 5 1 5 3 4 3.6 1 3 2 1 4 2.2
R315 3 3 2 2 1 2.2 4 3 1 2 5 3 3 1 3 2 1 2
R316 2 2 3 2 3 2.4 3 1 2 1 2 1.8 1 3 4 3 3 2.8
R317 2 1 5 4 5 3.4 2 3 4 3 1 2.6 2 1 5 2 4 2.8
MEAN 2.96 2.8 2.96 2.6 2.56 3 2.92 2.92 2.72 2.76 2.76 2.48 2.84 2.8 2.92
GRAND MEAN 2.776 2.864 2.76

DATU NAKAN
Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
R335 1 4 1 5 3 2.8 4 3 2 4 5 3.6 1 5 5 5 4 4
R336 3 4 3 5 4 3.8 3 2 2 3 4 2.8 2 3 1 4 3 2.6
R337 2 3 4 5 5 3.8 5 1 3 2 3 2.8 3 1 3 3 5 3
R338 4 1 5 4 3 3.4 4 1 4 1 2 2.4 4 3 3 3 4 3.4
R339 5 2 5 3 4 3.8 5 1 5 3 1 3 5 4 5 4 2 4
R340 4 4 4 4 5 4.2 3 1 1 4 4 2.6 4 5 3 4 3 3.8
R341 3 4 3 5 2 3.4 5 4 2 5 5 4.2 3 2 1 5 4 3
R342 1 5 3 2 1 2.4 4 4 3 2 3 3.2 1 3 1 4 5 2.8
R343 3 5 4 1 2 3 3 3 4 3 4 3.4 1 4 2 3 2 2.4
R344 3 4 5 2 3 3.4 3 5 4 4 5 4.2 2 5 5 3 1 3.2
R345 4 4 2 3 4 3.4 4 5 2 1 3 3 5 4 4 4 2 3.8
R346 5 3 1 4 2 3 5 3 1 4 4 3.4 4 3 5 5 3 4
R347 2 3 2 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 5 4 4 3 4 2 4 3.4
R348 3 3 1 5 2 2.8 5 5 4 3 2 3.8 5 2 5 2 5 3.8
R349 4 4 3 5 4 4 3 3 5 2 4 3.4 4 1 3 1 4 2.6
R350 5 5 4 3 4 4.2 4 5 3 5 2 3.8 3 2 3 2 3 2.6
R351 3 4 5 2 2 3.2 4 3 4 3 4 3.6 2 3 3 4 3 3
R352 4 3 3 3 5 3.6 5 4 5 2 5 4.2 1 4 3 5 4 3.4
MEAN 3.277778 3.611111 3.222222 3.611111 3.277778 4.055556 3.166667 3.166667 3.055556 3.611111 3 3.166667 3.277778 3.5 3.388889
GRAND MEAN 3.4 3.411111 3.266667
67

Appendix 10
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong

The scenes as we are conducting the research survey to our respondents.

APPENDIX
68
69

You might also like