REPORT

Environmental Analysis of
Quality of Life at IIM Jammu

Group members:
Aastha Singhal [IPM22004]
Ishita Chandra [IPM22020]
Kanak Joshi [IPM22024]
Miya J Mohan [IPM22032]
Nikitha M S [IPM22033]
Shreya Binu Sathyan [IPM22050]
 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The main significance of this report is to analyze the quality of life of the students living in the
Indian Institute of Management Jammu and their daily life basic needs in IIM Jammu, related to
hygiene, infrastructure, mess food, curricular activities, facilities for Sports and Gym and so on.

The survey was conducted through Google Form in order to find out the quality of life of
students at the Indian Institute of Management Jammu. A set of questions were prepared for the
survey with scales ranging from 1 to 5 where 1 indicates extreme dissatisfaction, 5 indicates
extreme satisfaction, and 2 to 4 indicates a moderate level of satisfaction.

The survey was distributed to MBA, IPM, and HAHM students studying at IIM Jammu. A total
of 42 responses were received and this report shows the estimate of those 42 responses only.

The following are the main findings of the survey -

● HOSTEL INFRASTRUCTURE: 40% of the people were not satisfied at all. 60% of
votes were between the range of 2 and 4 which clearly indicates a moderate level of
satisfaction among the majority of the individuals.
● HYGIENIC CONDITIONS: 51.28% voted for extreme dissatisfaction and no person
voted for extreme level of satisfaction.
● LIVING ARRANGEMENTS: 30% of the people are extremely dissatisfied with the
living conditions of the IIM Jammu and nearly 70% of people voted for the moderate
satisfactory level.
● FACILITIES PROVIDED: Nearly, 28.9% of the people voted for the extreme
dissatisfaction in the facilities provided, and 71.03 % were moderate in their responses.
● FOOD PROVIDED: 77.5% of people were satisfied with the food provided at the and
only 2.5 % were not satisfied.
● MESS TIMINGS: 95% of People were satisfied with the mess timings of the IIM
Jammu and only 13% were not satisfied with the timing arrangement.
● CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES: In curricular activities, 88.1% of the students were
satisfied with the curriculum of the campus, and only 27% were not satisfied.
● FACILITIES PROVIDED FOR THE GYM AND SPORTS: 85% of the people were
satisfied with the facilities provided for the gym and sports.

The major problem lies in the infrastructure with the majority of the students opting for a better
living environment, but the students are very optimistic about their overall living conditions at
the Indian Institute of Management Jammu and they say that they will figure it out by working
together collectively and collaboratively.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report: Environmental Analysis of Life at IIM

Jammu………………………………………………….1

Executive
Summary…………………………………………………
………………………………………………………….2

Introduction………………………………………………
………………………………………………………..4-5

Detailed Report
Analysis…………………………………………………
……………................................................................6-16
 INTRODUCTION

Creating a safe and supportive environment for students is a top priority for educational
institutions around the world. The Indian Institute of Management Jammu (IIM Jammu) is no
exception. To gain insights into the current state of student safety at IIM Jammu, a survey was
conducted among students across all courses. Infrastructure, food, hygiene, washrooms,
roommates, WiFi, extracurriculars, sports and gym, and bullying were all covered in the survey.

The goal of this report is to present the survey results and propose strategies for making IIM
Jammu a safer and more supportive environment. The research is limited to the information
gathered through the survey and does not include any other data or perspectives. Furthermore,
the survey's limitations, such as potential biases or sample size limitations, will be acknowledged
and addressed in the report.

The information for this report was gathered through an online survey distributed to all IIM
Jammu students. The survey was created to collect information about students' experiences and
perceptions of safety and wellbeing on campus.

The report will be divided into sections, each focusing on a different topic. These sections will
include a survey data analysis as well as proposed strategies and recommendations for improving
student safety and wellbeing. Infrastructure, food, hygiene, washrooms, roommates, WiFi,
extracurriculars, sports and gym, and bullying will all be covered.

Examining these factors may provide insights into the lifestyle and habits of those at IIM Jammu,
as well as strategies for improving quality of life and promoting healthy behaviours.

Finally, the findings of the student safety survey at IIM Jammu are critical in identifying areas
for improvement and proposing strategies for creating a safer and more supportive environment
for all students. The sections of the report that follow will provide a detailed analysis of the
survey data as well as recommendations for effecting positive change.

The data gathered on infrastructure, food, hygiene, washrooms, roommates, wifi,

extracurriculars, sports and gym, and bullying can provide valuable insights into IIM Jammu's
living conditions and culture.

Infrastructure: Information about infrastructure can help students understand the basic
amenities and facilities available to them at IIM Jammu. This may include information about the
quality of buildings, the availability of technology and equipment, and other factors that affect
students' daily lives.

Mess: Food information can provide insight into the quality and variety of food available to
students, as well as the food culture at IIM Jammu.
Washrooms and Hygiene: Information about hygiene and washrooms can help students
understand the cleanliness and sanitation practises at IIM Jammu, which can affect their health
and well-being.

Roommates: Information about roommates can shed light on the social dynamics and
relationships that exist among students who live in close quarters.

WiFi: WiFi information can provide insights into the availability and quality of internet access,
which is critical for students who rely on technology for coursework and communication.

Extracurricular activities: Information about extracurricular activities can provide insight into
the socialization and personal development opportunities available to students at IIM Jammu.

Sports and gym facilities: Information about sports and gym facilities can provide insight into
the availability of physical activity and wellness opportunities at IIM Jammu.

Bullying: Bullying information can provide insights into IIM Jammu's culture of respect and
inclusion, as well as areas for improvement in terms of creating a safe and supportive learning
environment for all students.
 DETAILED REPORT ANALYSIS

The survey received a total of 42 responses, of which 78.6% (33 responses) were from IPM02,
9.5% (4 responses) were from IPM01, 4.8% (2 responses) were from HAHM, 4.8% (2
responses) were from MBA07, 2.4% (1 response) were from MBA06, and 0% were from PhD
students.

This breakdown shows that the majority of the respondents were from IPM02, which may
indicate that the survey was distributed more widely among that group or that they were more
motivated to participate in the survey. It is important to note that this breakdown only provides a
snapshot of the responses and cannot be generalized to the entire population without
further analysis.

The survey consists of 10 questions, including both multiple-choice and open-ended questions.
The questions focus on gathering feedback and opinions on the user's experience at IIM Jammu.
The survey also provides a space for respondents to add any comments or complaints.

All questions have received 42 responses and all the responses have been collected on a scale of
1 to 5 with 1 being the lowest level of satisfaction and 5 being the highest.
Analysis of responses for Question 1 –

“How satisfied are you with the Hostel Infrastructure?"

Scale 1: 17 respondents (40.5%) have expressed the lowest level of satisfaction with the hostel
infrastructure.

Scale 2: 14 respondents (33.3%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than Scale
1 but still below average satisfaction with the hostel infrastructure.

Scale 3: 7 respondents (16.7%) have expressed an average level of satisfaction with the hostel
infrastructure.

Scale 4: 4 respondents (9.5%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than Scale 3
but still below the highest level of satisfaction.

Scale 5: 0 respondents (0%) have expressed the highest level of satisfaction with the hostel
infrastructure.

Overall, the responses suggest that a majority of the respondents are not satisfied with the hostel
infrastructure. The responses from the Scale 1 and Scale 2 options indicate that 74% of the
respondents are not satisfied with the hostel infrastructure. However, it is also worth noting that
26% of the respondents are either satisfied or highly satisfied with the hostel infrastructure, as
indicated by the Scale 3 and Scale 4 options.
Analysis of responses for Question 2 –

“How satisfied are you with the Hygienic Conditions in your hostel?”

Scale 1: 22 respondents (52.4%) have expressed the lowest level of satisfaction with the
hygienic conditions in their hostel.

Scale 2: 11 respondents (26.2%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than
Scale 1 but still below average satisfaction with the hygienic conditions in their hostel.

Scale 3: 7 respondents (16.7%) have expressed an average level of satisfaction with the
hygienic conditions in their hostel.

Scale 4: 2 respondents (4.8%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than Scale
3 but still below the highest level of satisfaction.

Scale 5: 0 respondents (0%) have expressed the highest level of satisfaction with the hygienic
conditions in their hostel.

It appears that the majority of respondents are dissatisfied with the hygienic conditions in
their hostel. To improve the rating for this question, the hostel management could take steps
to improve the cleanliness of the hostel, such as increasing the frequency of cleaning,
providing cleaning supplies for the residents, and conducting regular inspections to ensure
that the hygiene standards are being maintained.
Analysis of responses for Question 3 –

“How satisfied are you with the living arrangements such as roommates, washrooms, etc. in
your hostel?”

Scale 1: 14 respondents (33.3%) have expressed the lowest level of satisfaction with their living
arrangements (roommates, washrooms).

Scale 2: 12 respondents (28.6%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than Scale
1 but still below average satisfaction with their living arrangements (roommates, washrooms).

Scale 3: 10 respondents (23.8%) have expressed an average level of satisfaction with their living
arrangements (roommates, washrooms).

Scale 4: 6 respondents (14.3%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than Scale 3
but still below the highest level of satisfaction.

Scale 5: 0 respondents (0%) have expressed the highest level of satisfaction with their living
arrangements (roommates, washrooms).

To improve the rating for this question, the hostel management can take the following steps:

• Conduct a survey among residents to identify their specific concerns regarding their
living arrangements, roommates, and washrooms.
• Address the concerns raised by residents promptly and effectively.
• Improve the cleanliness and maintenance of the hostel, particularly the washrooms.
• Develop and enforce clear guidelines for roommate behavior and encourage residents to
communicate effectively and respectfully with their roommates.
 • Provide regular opportunities for residents to provide feedback and suggestions
for improvement.

Analysis of responses for Question 4 –

“How satisfied are you with the facilities provided in your hostel such as WiFi, drinking
water, etc. in your hostel?”

Scale 1: 8 respondents (19%) have expressed the lowest level of satisfaction with the facilities
provided at their hostel (WiFi, Water, etc.).

Scale 2: 9 respondents (21%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than Scale
1 but still below average satisfaction with the facilities provided at their hostel (Wifi, Water,
etc.).

Scale 3: 16 respondents (38%) have expressed an average level of satisfaction with the
facilities provided at their hostel (Wifi, Water, etc.).

Scale 4: 8 respondents (19%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than Scale
3 but still below the highest level of satisfaction.

Scale 5: 1 respondent (2%) has expressed the highest level of satisfaction with the facilities
provided at their hostel (Wifi, Water, etc.).

To improve the rating, the hostel management can consider the following suggestions:

• Improve the quality of Wifi and ensure that it is available throughout the hostel.
• Ensure that there is a continuous supply of clean water and that the water quality is
good.
 • Conduct regular maintenance checks to ensure that all facilities are in good working
condition.
• Seek feedback from residents regularly and take action on their suggestions and
complaints.
• Provide additional facilities such as a common room, and study room to improve the
living experience of the residents.

Analysis of responses for Question 5 –

“How satisfied are you with the food provided at the mess?”

Scale 1: 9 respondents (21.4%) have expressed the lowest level of satisfaction with the food
provided at the mess.

Scale 2: 5 respondents (11.9%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than Scale 1
but still below average satisfaction with the food provided at the mess.

Scale 3: 15 respondents (35.7%) have expressed an average level of satisfaction with the food
provided at the mess.

Scale 4: 12 respondents (28.6%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than Scale
3 but still below the highest level of satisfaction.

Scale 5: 1 respondent (2.4%) has expressed the highest level of satisfaction with the food
provided at the mess.

It appears that most of the respondents have expressed average or below-average satisfaction
with the food provided at the mess. To improve the rating, the hostel management could consider
conducting surveys to gather feedback on specific areas of improvement and take appropriate
action. They could also consider bringing in more variety and healthier food options to cater to
the diverse preferences and dietary requirements of the students.

Analysis of responses for Question 6 –

“How satisfied are you with the mess timings in your campus?”

Scale 1: 2 respondents (4.8%) have expressed the lowest level of satisfaction with the mess
timings.

Scale 2: 6 respondents (14.3%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than
Scale 1 but still below average satisfaction with the mess timings.

Scale 3: 14 respondents (33.3%) have expressed an average level of satisfaction with the mess
timings.

Scale 4: 17 respondents (40.5%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than
Scale 3 but still below the highest level of satisfaction.

Scale 5: 3 respondents (7.1%) have expressed the highest level of satisfaction with the mess
timings.

It seems that a majority of respondents are either satisfied with the mess timings or have a
slightly higher level of satisfaction. However, some respondents have expressed the lowest
level of satisfaction or a slightly higher level of dissatisfaction. It may be helpful to
investigate further and see if there are any specific issues or concerns that need to be
addressed to improve the satisfaction level of those respondents.
Analysis of responses for Question 7 –

“How satisfied are you with the extracurricular activities such as events or competitions in
your hostel?”

Scale 1: 1 respondent (2.4%) has expressed the lowest level of satisfaction with the
extracurricular activities conducted.

Scale 2: 9 respondents (21.4%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than
Scale 1 but still below average satisfaction with the extracurricular activities conducted.

Scale 3: 17 respondents (40.5%) have expressed an average level of satisfaction with the
extracurricular activities conducted.

Scale 4: 14 respondents (33.3%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than
Scale 3 but still below the highest level of satisfaction with the extracurricular activities
conducted.

Scale 5: 1 respondent (2.4%) has expressed the highest level of satisfaction with the
extracurricular activities conducted.

Based on the responses, it appears that a majority of the respondents (57.1%) are satisfied to
some extent with the extracurricular activities conducted. The most common response is
"average" satisfaction (Scale 3), followed closely by "slightly higher than average"
satisfaction (Scale 4). Only a small percentage of respondents are highly satisfied (Scale 5) or
highly dissatisfied (Scale 1) with the extracurricular activities.
Overall, the responses suggest that the extracurricular activities program is generally meeting
the needs and expectations of the respondents, but there may still be room for improvement in
order to increase the number of highly satisfied respondents.

Analysis of responses for Question 8 –

“How satisfied are you with the facilities provided for sports and gym in your campus?”

Scale 1: 1 respondent (2.4%) has expressed the lowest level of satisfaction with the facilities
provided for sports and gym.

Scale 2: 6 respondents (14.3%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than
Scale 1 but still below average satisfaction with the facilities provided for sports and gym.

Scale 3: 17 respondents (40.5%) have expressed an average level of satisfaction with the
facilities provided for sports and gym.

Scale 4: 13 respondents (31%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than Scale
3 but still below the highest level of satisfaction.

Scale 5: 5 respondents (11.9%) have expressed the highest level of satisfaction with the
facilities provided for sports and gym.

Overall, the responses suggest that a majority of the respondents are either satisfied or have a
slightly higher level of satisfaction with the facilities provided for sports and gym. The
responses from Scale 3 and Scale 4 options indicate that 71.5% of the respondents are either
satisfied or have a slightly higher level of satisfaction. Additionally, 11.9% of the respondents
have expressed the highest level of satisfaction, indicating that the facilities provided for
sports and gym are meeting the needs of some respondents. However, it is also worth noting
that 16.7% of the respondents are not satisfied with the facilities provided for sports and gym,
as indicated by the Scale 1 and Scale 2 options.

Analysis of responses for Question 9 –

“Are you facing any issues regarding bullying?”

Based on the survey, all 42 respondents answered "No" to the question "Are you facing any
issues regarding bullying?" indicating that none of them are facing any issues
related to bullying and are completely satisfied with regard to this question.

Analysis of responses for Question 10 –

“How would you rate your overall life at IIM Jammu?”

Scale 1: 2 respondents (4.8%) have expressed the lowest level of satisfaction with their overall
life at IIM Jammu.

Scale 2: 6 respondents (14.3%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than Scale 1
but still below average satisfaction with their overall life at IIM Jammu.

Scale 3: 22 respondents (52.4%) have expressed an average level of satisfaction with their
overall life at IIM Jammu.

Scale 4: 9 respondents (21.4%) have expressed a slightly higher level of satisfaction than Scale 3
but still below the highest level of satisfaction.

Scale 5: 3 respondents (7.1%) have expressed the highest level of satisfaction with their overall
life at IIM Jammu.

The responses suggest that a majority of the respondents are satisfied with their overall life at
IIM Jammu. The responses from the Scale 3 option indicate that more than half of the
respondents have an average level of satisfaction, while the responses from the Scale 4 and Scale
5 options indicate that some respondents have a higher level of satisfaction. However, it is also
worth noting that about 19% of the respondents have expressed a lower level of satisfaction, as
indicated by the Scale 1 and Scale 2 options.

-----------------------------------------