You are on page 1of 70

 

SSTRUC CTUR
RAL DEESIGN
N REP
PORT  
         FLYOVER A
AT 0++950(LHS)

MARC
CH 2023
Date
Part of Structure: DESIGN OF FLYOVER AT 0+950
Mar‐23

CONTENTS

Sl. No. Item Description Page

1  Design of Superstructure 1

2 Design of Substructure 31
  DESIGN OF  SUPERSTRUCTURE

1
Des. Rev.

0
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Feb‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
1.0. General Data
1.1. Climatic Data
Maximum Design temperature = 37.5 
Minimum Design temperature = 17.5 
Design Realtive Humidity = 73 %
Exposure condition = SEVERE
1.2. Construction Data
End of curing after casting concrete = 7 days
Time of first stage prestressing after casting concrete = 7 days
2.0. Material Properties
2.1. Concrete
Grade of concrete for PSC girders = M50
Grade of concrete for deck slab = M40
Characteristic compressive strength at 28 days f ck = 50 MPa
Eq. 6.3 of Characteristic compressive strength at 14 days = 45 MPa
IRC:112:2011 Characteristic compressive strength at 7 days = 38 MPa
Cl. 6.4.2.8 of Partial factor on strength of concrete c = 1.5
IRC:112:2011  cc = 0.67
 ct = 0.67
Design compressive strength of concrete,  f cd =  cc .f ck /  c = 22.3 MPa
Table 6.5 of Mean tensile strength of concrete,  f ctm = 3.5 MPa
IRC:112:2011 f ctk0,05 = 2.3 MPa

Time of prestressing after concreting = 28 days
Compressive strength of concrete at the time of prestressing = 50 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity (design value) of PSC girder E cm,g = 35 GPa
Modulus of Elasticity (design value) of Deck slab E cm,ds = 33 GPa
Unit weight of concrete = 25 kN/m3 
2.2. Pre‐stressing steel
Type and dia. of strands : 7ply‐12.7mm‐II
Relaxation type Low
Dia. of each strand = 12.7 mm
Table 18.4 of Cross sectional area of each strand A ps = 98.80 mm2
IRC:112:2011 Breaking load of each strand F pu = 183.71 kN
Cl.6.3.5 Ultimate tensile strength of prestressing steel f yp  = F pu /A ps = 1859 MPa
Maximum number of strands per cable = 19 Nos.
Total number of cables = 3 Nos.
Cl.6.3.5 Initial prestress in strands f pd  = f p0.1k / s  = 0.87f yp /1.15 = 1406 MPa
Cl.7.9.5(6) of Modulus of Elasticity E sp = 195 GPa
IRC:112:2011 Partial factors for prestressing force (SLS)  sup = 1.1
 inf = 0.90
2.3. Reinforcing steel
Characteristic strength of longitudinal steel f yk = 500 MPa
Characteristic strength of shear steel f ykw = 500 MPa
Cl. 6.2.2 of Partial factor on strength of steel s = 1.15
IRC:112:2011 Design yield strength of longitudinal steel,  f yd = f yk /  s = 435 MPa
Design yield strength of shear steel,  f ywd = f ykw /  s = 435 MPa
Cl.6.2.2 of Modulus of Elasticity (design value) ES = 200 GPa
IRC:112:2011 Clear cover to reinforcing steel (for 'SEVERE' exposure condition) = 45 mm

2
Des. Rev.

0
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Feb‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
2.4. Prestressing system
Cl. 13.4.3 of Cable duct nominal ID = 85 mm
IRC:112:2011 Cable duct nominal OD = 100 mm
Cross sectional area of Cable duct = 7850 mm2
Clear cover required for cable duct = 75 mm
C.15.3.1.3 Minimum spacing between cable ducts max. of (50,100) = 100 mm
Effective cover of cable = 125 mm
Table 7.1 of Wobble coefficient k = 0.0020
IRC:112:2011 Curvature friction coefficient  = 0.17
slip for steel tendons s = 8 mm
Anchorage grip Lg = 750 mm
Size of anchorage bearing plate = 260 mm

3.0. Structure Definition
31. Deck Geometry
Shape of girder section = I
Effective span (CL bearing to CL bearing) L = 25.860 m
Overall length L1 = 26.675 m
Overall length of I‐girder L2 = 25.860 m
Overall depth of I‐girder H = 1800 mm
Carriage way width (inside kerb to inside kerb) CW = 12725 mm
Footpath width (inside of handrail to inside kerb) FW = 0 mm
Number of girders = 5 Nos.
Overall width of deck slab W = 13742 mm
Side overhang of deck slab (from C/L of exterior I‐girder) W1 = 1375 mm
Spacing of I‐girders (c/c dist. of I‐girders) W2 = 2748 mm
Top flange width of I‐girder W3 = 800 mm
Bottom flange width of I‐girder W4 = 700 mm
Effective width of flange of composite section (interior I‐girder) W5 = 2748 mm
Effective width of flange of composite section (exterior I‐girder) W6 = 2749 mm
End thickening of web starts from (dist from support) L3 = 1.3 m
End thickening of web ends at (dist from support) L4 = 3 m
Thickness of overhanging deck slab (at tip of cantilever) T1 = 225 mm
Thickness of overhanging deck slab (at face of I‐girder) T2 = 225 mm
Thickness of interior deck slab (at face of I‐girder) T3 = 225 mm
Max. thickness of top flange T4 = 250 mm
Min. thickness of top flange T5 = 150 mm
Thickness of web at mid‐span T6 = 280 mm
Max. thickness of bottom flange T7 = 400 mm
Min. thickness of bottom flange T8 = 250 mm
Thickness of end diapragm T9 = 300 mm
Thickness of intermediate cross girder T91 = 0 mm
Thickness of web at support T10 = 700 mm
Thickness of gap slab T11 = 350 mm
Vertical height of top Haunch =250‐150 = 100 mm
Vertical height of bottom Haunch =400‐250 = 150 mm
Wearing coat thickness = 65 mm

3
Des. Rev.

0
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Feb‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
1375 2748

800 800
225
150 250

280 3

1800

1800
2
400 1
250
700 700
C/S at Mid‐span C/S at Support
Fig. 3.1. Cross section of I girder
3.2. Check for span‐to‐depth ratio
Span‐to‐depth ratio provided (L1/D) = 14.4
which is less than accepted range of span‐to‐depth ratio = 20.0 "O.K."
3.3. Check for top flange width for lateral instability
Distance between torsional reatraints (supports in this case) =
l 0t 25.9 m
Depth of girder at mid‐span =
h 1800 mm
Effective width of copression flange (top flange) =
b 800 mm
=
h/b 2.25
=
l 0t /b 32.3
1/3
Cl.11.4. 70/(h/b) = 93.3
Eq. 11.13 minimum of (60b, 250b 2 /h) = 48.0 m
1/3
IRC:112:2011 Condition l 0t /b  70/(h/b) is OK
Condition h/b  3.5 is OK
Condition l 0t  minimum of (60b, 250b 2 /h) is OK "O.K."

3.4. Cable Pattern
Table 3.1.  Schedule for Cables and Strands
No. of  Dia. of 
Stage

Cable No Strands/ Strand Remarks


 cable (mm)
C‐ 1 18 12.7 2 Active
C‐ 2 18 12.7 2 Active
C‐ 3 12 12.7 1 Active
C‐ 4 12 12.7 1 Active
C‐ 5 0 12.7 Not used
C‐ 6 0 12.7 Not used
C‐ 7 0 12.7 Not used
C‐ 8 0 12.7 Not used
C‐ 9 0 12.7 Not used

4
Ref.
Table 3.4. Cable Profile
From support ‐0.25 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 14.50
X(mm) 14750 14500 13500 12500 11500 10500 9500 8500 7500 6500 5500 4500 3500 2500 1500 1500 1500 0
Y(mm) 300 283 213 157 129 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
Cable
Z(mm) 175 175 175 178 186 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
No. 1

Y(mm) 300 283 213 157 129 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
Cable
Z(mm) ‐175 ‐175 ‐175 ‐178 ‐186 ‐200 ‐200 ‐200 ‐200 ‐200 ‐200 ‐200 ‐200 ‐200 ‐200 ‐200 ‐200 ‐200
No. 2

Y(mm) 900 870 751 637 535 444 365 297 240 195 160 138 126 125 125 125 125 125
Cable
Z(mm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. 3

Y(mm) 1500 1458 1290 1129 984 852 735 633 546 473 414 371 327 327 325 325 325 325
Cable
Z(mm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. 4

5
Y(mm)
Cable
Z(mm)
No. 5
Calculations
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950

Y(mm)
Cable
Z(mm)
No. 6

Y(mm)
Cable
Z(mm)
No. 7

Y(mm)
Cable
Z(mm)
No. 8

Y(mm)
Cable
Z(mm)
No. 9
Chk.
Des.

0
Rev.

Date

Feb‐23
Output
Des. Rev.

0
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Feb‐23
Ref. Calculations Output

13.50 13.50

C‐2
C‐1

C‐3
11.50 11.50

9.50 9.50

7.50 7.50

Fig. 3.5. Cable Profile (Horizontal)


Fig. 3.4. Cable Profile (Vertical)

X (m)
5.50 5.50
X (m)

3.50 3.50

1.50 1.50

1600 1200 800 400 0 350 250 150 50 ‐50 ‐150 ‐250 ‐350
‐0.50 ‐0.50

Y (mm) Z (mm)

6
 Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950

Geometric Section Properties
Girder Only Composit Girder Only Composit
Property Unit
End Section Mid Section
Area 1.155 1.827 0.756 1.428 m^2
Ixx 0.098 0.105 0.022 0.029 m^4
Iyy 0.383 0.864 0.310 0.723 m^4
Izz 0.037 0.542 0.018 0.522 m^4
Cyp 0.400 0.400 0.407 0.404 m
Cym 0.400 0.400 0.393 0.396 m
Czp 0.946 0.556 0.958 0.453 m
Czm 0.954 1.344 0.942 1.447 m
Center:y 0.400 1.500 0.393 1.496 m
Center:z 0.954 1.344 0.942 1.447 m
y1 ‐0.400 ‐0.400 ‐0.393 ‐0.396 m
z1 0.946 0.556 0.958 0.453 m
y2 0.400 0.400 0.407 0.404 m
z2 0.946 0.556 0.958 0.453 m
y3 0.350 0.350 0.307 0.304 m
z3 ‐0.954 ‐1.344 ‐0.942 ‐1.447 m
y4 ‐0.350 ‐0.350 ‐0.343 ‐0.346 m
z4 ‐0.954 ‐1.344 ‐0.942 ‐1.447 m

7
Des. Rev.
0
Design of PSC Girder forFlyover at 0+950

Chk. Date
Mar‐23
Initial Prestressing Losses (Tendon T1) ‐ Stage 02
Member 
End Pinitial Lfri&Wob LElas‐Deform LossInitial %LossInitial Lcreep&Shrink Lrelax LossLong %LossLong
No
1 I 1406.0 196.3 9.1 205.4 14.6 18.5 20.4 244.4 17.4
2 J 1406.0 186.9 8.5 195.4 13.9 19.0 21.3 235.6 16.8
3 J 1406.0 184.0 7.6 191.6 13.6 19.0 21.6 232.2 16.5
4 J 1406.0 180.2 5.0 185.2 13.2 23.7 21.9 230.8 16.4
5 J 1406.0 177.7 2.0 179.7 12.8 28.3 22.1 230.1 16.4
6 J 1406.0 155.5 ‐7.5 148.0 10.5 31.8 24.2 204.0 14.5
7 J 1406.0 145.4 ‐12.8 132.7 9.4 30.2 25.2 188.1 13.4
8 J 1406.0 138.7 ‐16.2 122.5 8.7 29.1 25.8 177.4 12.6
9 J 1406.0 132.2 ‐18.2 114.0 8.1 28.4 26.5 168.9 12.0
10 J 1406.0 127.0 ‐18.8 108.1 7.7 28.1 27.0 163.2 11.6
11 J 1406.0 133.5 ‐18.2 115.3 8.2 28.4 26.4 170.0 12.1
12 J 1406.0 140.0 ‐16.2 123.8 8.8 29.2 25.7 178.7 12.7
13 J 1406.0 146.7 ‐12.8 133.9 9.5 30.5 25.1 189.4 13.5
14 J 1406.0 154.7 ‐7.9 146.8 10.4 32.2 24.3 203.4 14.5
15 J 1406.0 175.8 2.0 177.8 12.7 32.9 22.3 233.0 16.6
16 J 1406.0 180.4 5.5 185.9 13.2 25.1 21.9 232.8 16.6
17 J 1406.0 182.8 8.0 190.9 13.6 21.7 21.7 234.3 16.7
18 J 1406.0 187.6 8.9 196.5 14.0 19.7 21.2 237.5 16.9
19 J 1406.0 190.2 9.8 200.0 14.2 19.7 21.0 240.6 17.1
20 J 1406.0 199.0 9.0 208.0 14.8 18.5 20.2 246.7 17.6

Initial Prestressing Losses (Tendon T2) ‐ Stage 02
Member 
End Pinitial Lfri&Wob LElas‐Deform LossInitial %LossInitial Lcreep&Shrink Lrelax LossLong %LossLong
No
1 I 1406.0 196.3 ‐0.8 195.5 13.9 16.3 20.3 232.1 16.5
2 J 1406.0 186.9 ‐2.5 184.4 13.1 16.5 21.2 222.1 15.8
3 J 1406.0 184.0 ‐4.2 179.8 12.8 16.4 21.4 217.7 15.5
4 J 1406.0 180.2 ‐6.4 173.7 12.4 20.9 21.8 216.4 15.4
5 J 1406.0 177.7 ‐9.4 168.3 12.0 25.5 22.0 215.8 15.4
6 J 1406.0 155.5 ‐17.0 138.5 9.9 28.9 24.1 191.5 13.6
7 J 1406.0 145.4 ‐21.7 123.7 8.8 27.4 25.1 176.2 12.5
8 J 1406.0 138.7 ‐24.7 114.0 8.1 26.4 25.7 166.1 11.8
9 J 1406.0 132.2 ‐26.5 105.7 7.5 25.8 26.3 157.8 11.2
10 J 1406.0 127.0 ‐27.2 99.8 7.1 25.5 26.9 152.1 10.8
11 J 1406.0 133.5 ‐26.5 107.0 7.6 25.7 26.2 158.9 11.3
12 J 1406.0 140.0 ‐24.7 115.4 8.2 26.5 25.6 167.4 11.9
13 J 1406.0 146.7 ‐21.6 125.1 8.9 27.7 24.9 177.7 12.6
14 J 1406.0 154.7 ‐17.0 137.7 9.8 29.4 24.2 191.3 13.6
15 J 1406.0 175.8 ‐9.9 165.8 11.8 29.6 22.2 217.6 15.5
16 J 1406.0 180.4 ‐6.8 173.6 12.4 22.0 21.8 217.4 15.5
17 J 1406.0 182.8 ‐4.5 178.4 12.7 18.7 21.5 218.7 15.6
18 J 1406.0 187.6 ‐2.6 185.0 13.2 17.2 21.1 223.3 15.9
19 J 1406.0 190.2 ‐0.9 189.2 13.5 17.3 20.9 227.4 16.2
20 J 1406.0 199.0 ‐0.9 198.1 14.1 16.3 20.1 234.5 16.7

8
Des. Rev.
0
Design of PSC Girder forFlyover at 0+950

Chk. Date
Mar‐23
Initial Prestressing Losses (Tendon T3) ‐ Stage 02
Member 
End Pinitial Lfri&Wob LElas‐Deform LossInitial %LossInitial Lcreep&Shrink Lrelax LossLong %LossLong
No
1 I 1406.0 222.4 13.1 235.5 16.8 18.7 18.1 272.3 19.4
2 J 1406.0 206.1 14.9 221.0 15.7 18.8 19.6 259.3 18.4
3 J 1406.0 201.7 16.4 218.1 15.5 18.7 20.0 256.8 18.3
4 J 1406.0 194.4 21.2 215.6 15.3 24.1 20.6 260.3 18.5
5 J 1406.0 189.8 28.5 218.2 15.5 30.4 21.0 269.7 19.2
6 J 1406.0 175.5 38.7 214.1 15.2 39.0 22.3 275.5 19.6
7 J 1406.0 162.6 44.3 206.9 14.7 45.9 23.6 276.3 19.7
8 J 1406.0 149.7 47.1 196.8 14.0 51.5 24.8 273.1 19.4
9 J 1406.0 136.6 47.8 184.4 13.1 54.5 26.1 264.9 18.8
10 J 1406.0 130.2 47.9 178.1 12.7 54.2 26.7 259.0 18.4
11 J 1406.0 137.4 47.7 185.1 13.2 54.4 26.0 265.5 18.9
12 J 1406.0 149.5 47.3 196.7 14.0 52.6 24.8 274.2 19.5
13 J 1406.0 162.5 45.0 207.5 14.8 47.7 23.6 278.8 19.8
14 J 1406.0 175.4 40.0 215.4 15.3 41.0 22.4 278.7 19.8
15 J 1406.0 189.5 30.9 220.4 15.7 35.1 21.1 276.6 19.7
16 J 1406.0 192.5 23.3 215.8 15.4 24.8 20.8 261.4 18.6
17 J 1406.0 197.1 17.9 215.1 15.3 20.8 20.4 256.3 18.2
18 J 1406.0 206.0 16.0 222.0 15.8 18.9 19.6 260.4 18.5
19 J 1406.0 209.5 14.6 224.1 15.9 18.9 19.3 262.2 18.7
20 J 1406.0 225.2 13.1 238.2 17.0 18.7 17.9 274.8 19.6

Initial Prestressing Losses (Tendon 4) ‐ Stage 02
Member 
End Pinitial Lfri&Wob LElas‐Deform LossInitial %LossInitial Lcreep&Shrink Lrelax LossLong %LossLong
No
1 I 1406.0 252.4 ‐2.6 249.8 17.8 22.4 15.6 287.8 20.5
2 J 1406.0 230.8 ‐1.0 229.8 16.3 21.7 17.4 268.9 19.1
3 J 1406.0 225.3 0.5 225.8 16.1 21.1 17.9 264.8 18.8
4 J 1406.0 215.8 3.4 219.2 15.6 26.5 18.7 264.4 18.8
5 J 1406.0 209.9 8.8 218.7 15.6 32.3 19.2 270.2 19.2
6 J 1406.0 193.7 22.2 215.9 15.4 36.0 20.7 272.6 19.4
7 J 1406.0 178.7 31.8 210.5 15.0 40.9 22.0 273.5 19.5
8 J 1406.0 164.0 37.5 201.5 14.3 46.4 23.4 271.3 19.3
9 J 1406.0 141.9 40.5 182.4 13.0 50.0 25.5 258.0 18.4
10 J 1406.0 131.3 40.6 171.9 12.2 49.8 26.6 248.3 17.7
11 J 1406.0 141.6 40.4 182.0 13.0 49.9 25.6 257.5 18.3
12 J 1406.0 163.7 38.1 201.8 14.4 47.4 23.4 272.6 19.4
13 J 1406.0 179.0 33.1 212.2 15.1 42.4 22.0 276.5 19.7
14 J 1406.0 193.8 24.5 218.2 15.5 36.9 20.7 275.8 19.6
15 J 1406.0 209.6 11.6 221.2 15.7 34.9 19.2 275.4 19.6
16 J 1406.0 213.1 5.7 218.9 15.6 25.3 18.9 263.1 18.7
17 J 1406.0 219.1 2.0 221.0 15.7 22.0 18.4 261.4 18.6
18 J 1406.0 230.6 0.1 230.7 16.4 20.7 17.4 268.9 19.1
19 J 1406.0 234.9 ‐1.3 233.6 16.6 21.2 17.0 271.8 19.3
20 J 1406.0 255.7 ‐2.6 253.1 18.0 22.4 15.3 290.7 20.7

9
Des. Rev.
0
Design of PSC Girder forFlyover at 0+950

Chk. Date
Mar‐23
Long Term Prestressing Losses (Tendon T1) ‐ Stage 05
Member 
End Pinitial Lfri&Wob LElas‐Deform LossInitial %LossInitial Lcreep&Shrink Lrelax LossLong %LossLong
No
1 I 1406.0 196.3 5.3 201.7 14.3 94.9 67.7 364.3 25.9
2 J 1406.0 186.9 4.3 191.2 13.6 96.6 70.5 358.4 25.5
3 J 1406.0 184.0 3.3 187.3 13.3 97.2 71.4 356.0 25.3
4 J 1406.0 180.2 ‐0.6 179.6 12.8 110.6 72.6 362.8 25.8
5 J 1406.0 177.7 ‐6.1 171.6 12.2 129.2 73.3 374.2 26.6
6 J 1406.0 155.5 ‐17.4 138.2 9.8 137.5 80.2 356.0 25.3
7 J 1406.0 145.4 ‐23.7 121.7 8.7 138.0 83.5 343.2 24.4
8 J 1406.0 138.7 ‐27.9 110.8 7.9 137.9 85.6 334.3 23.8
9 J 1406.0 132.2 ‐30.4 101.7 7.2 137.8 87.7 327.3 23.3
10 J 1406.0 127.0 ‐31.1 95.8 6.8 137.2 89.4 322.4 22.9
11 J 1406.0 133.5 ‐30.4 103.1 7.3 137.7 87.3 328.1 23.3
12 J 1406.0 140.0 ‐28.1 112.0 8.0 138.6 85.2 335.8 23.9
13 J 1406.0 146.7 ‐24.0 122.7 8.7 139.4 83.0 345.2 24.6
14 J 1406.0 154.7 ‐18.0 136.7 9.7 139.9 80.5 357.1 25.4
15 J 1406.0 175.8 ‐6.4 169.3 12.0 136.5 73.9 379.7 27.0
16 J 1406.0 180.4 ‐0.5 179.8 12.8 115.3 72.5 367.7 26.2
17 J 1406.0 182.8 3.5 186.3 13.3 102.2 71.8 360.3 25.6
18 J 1406.0 187.6 4.6 192.2 13.7 99.4 70.3 361.9 25.7
19 J 1406.0 190.2 5.6 195.8 13.9 98.9 69.5 364.3 25.9
20 J 1406.0 199.0 5.4 204.4 14.5 95.0 66.9 366.3 26.1

Long Term Prestressing Losses (Tendon T2) ‐ Stage 05
Member 
End Pinitial Lfri&Wob LElas‐Deform LossInitial %LossInitial Lcreep&Shrink Lrelax LossLong %LossLong
No
1 I 1406.0 196.3 ‐4.8 191.5 13.6 92.4 67.7 351.6 25.0
2 J 1406.0 186.9 ‐6.8 180.2 12.8 94.1 70.5 344.8 24.5
3 J 1406.0 184.0 ‐8.6 175.4 12.5 94.5 71.4 341.4 24.3
4 J 1406.0 180.2 ‐12.2 168.0 12.0 107.7 72.6 348.3 24.8
5 J 1406.0 177.7 ‐17.4 160.3 11.4 126.3 73.3 359.9 25.6
6 J 1406.0 155.5 ‐26.9 128.6 9.2 134.6 80.2 343.4 24.4
7 J 1406.0 145.4 ‐32.7 112.8 8.0 135.2 83.5 331.4 23.6
8 J 1406.0 138.7 ‐36.5 102.2 7.3 135.2 85.6 323.1 23.0
9 J 1406.0 132.2 ‐38.8 93.4 6.6 135.2 87.7 316.3 22.5
10 J 1406.0 127.0 ‐39.5 87.4 6.2 134.5 89.4 311.4 22.2
11 J 1406.0 133.5 ‐38.8 94.7 6.7 135.0 87.3 317.0 22.6
12 J 1406.0 140.0 ‐36.6 103.4 7.4 135.8 85.2 324.4 23.1
13 J 1406.0 146.7 ‐33.0 113.7 8.1 136.5 83.0 333.2 23.7
14 J 1406.0 154.7 ‐27.4 127.3 9.1 136.7 80.5 344.5 24.5
15 J 1406.0 175.8 ‐18.9 156.9 11.2 132.6 73.9 363.4 25.8
16 J 1406.0 180.4 ‐13.1 167.3 11.9 112.0 72.5 351.9 25.0
17 J 1406.0 182.8 ‐9.3 173.6 12.4 98.9 71.8 344.3 24.5
18 J 1406.0 187.6 ‐7.2 180.4 12.8 96.5 70.3 347.2 24.7
19 J 1406.0 190.2 ‐5.3 184.8 13.2 96.2 69.5 350.6 24.9
20 J 1406.0 199.0 ‐4.5 194.5 13.8 92.8 66.9 354.2 25.2

10
Des. Rev.
0
Design of PSC Girder forFlyover at 0+950

Chk. Date
Mar‐23
Long Term Prestressing Losses (Tendon T3) ‐ Stage 05
Member 
End Pinitial Lfri&Wob LElas‐Deform LossInitial %LossInitial Lcreep&Shrink Lrelax LossLong %LossLong
No
1 I 1406.0 222.4 9.8 232.3 16.5 98.5 60.0 390.8 27.8
2 J 1406.0 206.1 11.1 217.2 15.5 100.4 64.8 382.4 27.2
3 J 1406.0 201.7 11.9 213.6 15.2 101.3 66.1 381.0 27.1
4 J 1406.0 194.4 14.6 209.1 14.9 116.8 68.3 394.2 28.0
5 J 1406.0 189.8 18.7 208.4 14.8 137.8 69.7 415.9 29.6
6 J 1406.0 175.5 19.9 195.4 13.9 158.6 74.0 428.0 30.4
7 J 1406.0 162.6 16.6 179.2 12.7 172.2 78.0 429.4 30.5
8 J 1406.0 149.7 12.4 162.2 11.5 181.6 82.1 425.9 30.3
9 J 1406.0 136.6 9.4 146.0 10.4 185.9 86.3 418.2 29.7
10 J 1406.0 130.2 8.9 139.0 9.9 184.9 88.4 412.3 29.3
11 J 1406.0 137.4 9.4 146.8 10.4 185.6 86.0 418.4 29.8
12 J 1406.0 149.5 12.0 161.5 11.5 183.8 82.2 427.5 30.4
13 J 1406.0 162.5 16.2 178.7 12.7 176.2 78.0 433.0 30.8
14 J 1406.0 175.4 20.0 195.3 13.9 163.7 74.1 433.1 30.8
15 J 1406.0 189.5 19.7 209.2 14.9 147.7 69.7 426.7 30.4
16 J 1406.0 192.5 16.0 208.5 14.8 120.8 68.8 398.1 28.3
17 J 1406.0 197.1 12.9 210.0 14.9 106.6 67.4 384.1 27.3
18 J 1406.0 206.0 12.0 217.9 15.5 102.1 64.8 384.9 27.4
19 J 1406.0 209.5 11.1 220.6 15.7 101.2 63.8 385.6 27.4
20 J 1406.0 225.2 10.1 235.3 16.7 98.7 59.2 393.2 28.0

Long Term Prestressing Losses (Tendon T4) ‐ Stage 05
Member 
End Pinitial Lfri&Wob LElas‐Deform LossInitial %LossInitial Lcreep&Shrink Lrelax LossLong %LossLong
No
1 I 1406.0 252.4 ‐4.4 248.0 17.6 90.2 51.5 389.8 27.7
2 J 1406.0 230.8 ‐2.0 228.8 16.3 91.7 57.6 378.0 26.9
3 J 1406.0 225.3 ‐0.2 225.2 16.0 92.5 59.2 376.9 26.8
4 J 1406.0 215.8 2.4 218.1 15.5 105.7 61.9 385.8 27.4
5 J 1406.0 209.9 6.4 216.3 15.4 123.1 63.7 403.1 28.7
6 J 1406.0 193.7 13.3 207.0 14.7 141.1 68.5 416.6 29.6
7 J 1406.0 178.7 14.2 192.9 13.7 156.0 73.0 421.9 30.0
8 J 1406.0 164.0 12.1 176.1 12.5 167.7 77.6 421.4 30.0
9 J 1406.0 141.9 9.9 151.8 10.8 174.8 84.6 411.2 29.2
10 J 1406.0 131.3 9.5 140.7 10.0 174.1 88.0 402.8 28.7
11 J 1406.0 141.6 9.9 151.5 10.8 174.5 84.7 410.6 29.2
12 J 1406.0 163.7 11.8 175.5 12.5 170.0 77.7 423.2 30.1
13 J 1406.0 179.0 14.1 193.1 13.7 159.8 72.9 425.8 30.3
14 J 1406.0 193.8 14.0 207.8 14.8 145.1 68.5 421.4 30.0
15 J 1406.0 209.6 7.8 217.5 15.5 129.7 63.8 410.9 29.2
16 J 1406.0 213.1 4.0 217.1 15.4 106.6 62.7 386.4 27.5
17 J 1406.0 219.1 1.0 220.1 15.7 95.3 61.0 376.4 26.8
18 J 1406.0 230.6 ‐1.0 229.6 16.3 91.4 57.7 378.7 26.9
19 J 1406.0 234.9 ‐3.1 231.8 16.5 90.1 56.5 378.4 26.9
20 J 1406.0 255.7 ‐4.1 251.6 17.9 90.4 50.6 392.6 27.9

11
Des. Rev.
0
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950

Chk. Date
Mar‐23
Girder Stresses (Long Term) N/mm2 Girder Stresses (Long Term) N/mm2
Elem Top Bottom Elem Top Bottom
End End
ent Tens Comp Tens Comp ent Tens Comp Tens Comp
59 I 0 ‐6.690 0.000 ‐6.070 109 J 0 ‐9.29 0 ‐9.59
59 J 0 ‐6.360 0.000 ‐6.060 109 I 0 ‐8.14 0 ‐8.79
60 I 0 ‐6.370 0.000 ‐6.060 110 J 0 ‐8.13 0 ‐8.78
60 J 0 ‐6.190 0.000 ‐6.080 110 I 0 ‐7.91 0 ‐9.05
61 I 0 ‐6.890 0.000 ‐7.370 111 J 0 ‐7.78 0 ‐9.05
61 J 0 ‐6.540 0.000 ‐6.790 111 I 0 ‐7.94 0 ‐9.27
62 I 0 ‐6.540 0.000 ‐6.790 112 J 0 ‐7.86 0 ‐9.26
62 J 0 ‐6.350 0.000 ‐6.570 112 I 0 ‐7.9 0 ‐9.46
63 I 0 ‐6.930 0.000 ‐9.110 113 J 0 ‐7.87 0 ‐9.46
63 J 0 ‐6.570 0.000 ‐8.170 113 I 0 ‐7.82 0 ‐9.65
64 I 0 ‐6.570 0.000 ‐8.180 114 J 0 ‐7.84 0 ‐9.65
64 J 0 ‐6.380 0.000 ‐7.800 114 I 0 ‐7.85 0 ‐9.46
65 I 0 ‐6.940 0.000 ‐5.320 115 J 0 ‐7.93 0 ‐9.46
65 J 0 ‐6.580 0.000 ‐5.360 115 I 0 ‐7.83 0 ‐9.27
66 I 0 ‐6.580 0.000 ‐5.360 116 J 0 ‐7.96 0 ‐9.26
66 J 0 ‐6.390 0.000 ‐5.450 116 I 0 ‐7.75 0 ‐9.05
67 I 0 ‐6.730 0.000 ‐6.040 117 J 0 ‐7.93 0 ‐9.05
67 J 0 ‐6.400 0.000 ‐6.030 117 I 0 ‐8.13 0 ‐8.79
68 I 0 ‐6.400 0.000 ‐6.040 118 J 0 ‐8.13 0 ‐8.79
68 J 0 ‐6.220 0.000 ‐6.060 118 I 0 ‐9.29 0 ‐9.52
69 I 0 ‐6.030 0.000 ‐6.110 119 J 0 ‐9.3 0 ‐8.26
69 J 0 ‐6.220 0.000 ‐6.060 119 I 0 ‐8.14 0 ‐8.79
70 I 0 ‐6.400 0.000 ‐6.040 120 J 0 ‐8.14 0 ‐8.79
70 J 0 ‐6.730 0.000 ‐6.040 120 I 0 ‐7.42 0 ‐9.04
71 I 0 ‐6.180 0.000 ‐6.310 121 J 0 ‐7.43 0 ‐9.04
71 J 0 ‐6.380 0.000 ‐6.500 121 I 0 ‐7.21 0 ‐9.23
72 I 0 ‐6.570 0.000 ‐6.730 122 J 0 ‐7.24 0 ‐9.23
72 J 0 ‐6.930 0.000 ‐7.290 122 I 0 ‐7.15 0 ‐9.42
73 I 0 ‐6.170 0.000 ‐7.460 123 J 0 ‐7.18 0 ‐9.42
73 J 0 ‐6.380 0.000 ‐7.810 123 I 0 ‐7.09 0 ‐9.6
74 I 0 ‐6.560 0.000 ‐8.190 124 J 0 ‐7.1 0 ‐9.6
74 J 0 ‐6.920 0.000 ‐9.120 124 I 0 ‐7.17 0 ‐9.42
75 I 0 ‐6.150 0.000 ‐5.570 125 J 0 ‐7.18 0 ‐9.41
75 J 0 ‐6.350 0.000 ‐5.460 125 I 0 ‐7.24 0 ‐9.24
76 I 0 ‐6.530 0.000 ‐5.370 126 J 0 ‐7.24 0 ‐9.23
76 J 0 ‐6.880 0.000 ‐5.440 126 I 0 ‐7.43 0 ‐9.04
77 I 0 ‐6.000 0.000 ‐6.120 127 J 0 ‐7.42 0 ‐9.04
77 J 0 ‐6.190 0.000 ‐6.080 127 I 0 ‐8.14 0 ‐8.79
78 I 0 ‐6.360 0.000 ‐6.060 128 J 0 ‐8.14 0 ‐8.8
78 J 0 ‐6.690 0.000 ‐6.070 128 I 0 ‐9.28 0 ‐8.26
79 I 0 ‐6.430 0.000 ‐5.480 129 J 0 ‐9.26 0 ‐8.68
79 J 0 ‐8.680 0.000 ‐7.960 129 I 0 ‐8.21 0 ‐8.86
80 I 0 ‐6.580 0.000 ‐6.270 130 J 0 ‐8.18 0 ‐8.85
80 J 0 ‐8.770 0.000 ‐8.000 130 I 0 ‐7.6 0 ‐8.85
81 I 0 ‐6.600 0.000 ‐7.360 131 J 0 ‐7.57 0 ‐8.85
81 J 0 ‐8.780 0.000 ‐8.920 131 I 0 ‐7.35 0 ‐8.86
82 I 0 ‐6.610 0.000 ‐5.090 132 J 0 ‐7.33 0 ‐8.86
82 J 0 ‐8.790 0.000 ‐7.530 132 I 0 ‐7.17 0 ‐8.93
83 I 0 ‐6.470 0.000 ‐5.460 133 J 0 ‐7.16 0 ‐8.94
83 J 0 ‐8.690 0.000 ‐7.940 133 I 0 ‐7.06 0 ‐9.07

12
Des. Rev.
0
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950

Chk. Date
Mar‐23
Girder Stresses (Long Term) N/mm2 Girder Stresses (Long Term) N/mm2
Elem Top Bottom Elem Top Bottom
End End
ent Tens Comp Tens Comp ent Tens Comp Tens Comp
84 I 0 ‐9.630 0.000 ‐8.870 134 J 0 ‐7.06 0 ‐9.08
84 J 0 ‐8.010 0.000 ‐7.590 134 I 0 ‐7.17 0 ‐8.93
85 I 0 ‐9.700 0.000 ‐8.760 135 J 0 ‐7.17 0 ‐8.94
85 J 0 ‐8.100 0.000 ‐7.920 135 I 0 ‐7.34 0 ‐8.85
86 I 0 ‐9.690 0.000 ‐9.710 136 J 0 ‐7.36 0 ‐8.86
86 J 0 ‐8.090 0.000 ‐8.900 136 I 0 ‐7.58 0 ‐8.84
87 I 0 ‐9.680 0.000 ‐8.500 137 J 0 ‐7.61 0 ‐8.86
87 J 0 ‐8.070 0.000 ‐7.230 137 I 0 ‐8.2 0 ‐8.85
88 I 0 ‐9.640 0.000 ‐8.900 138 J 0 ‐8.23 0 ‐8.87
88 J 0 ‐7.990 0.000 ‐7.700 138 I 0 ‐9.24 0 ‐8.68
89 I 0 ‐9.250 0.000 ‐8.680 441 J 0 ‐6.19 0 ‐6.08
89 J 0 ‐8.230 0.000 ‐8.870 441 I 0 ‐6.01 0 ‐6.12
90 I 0 ‐8.200 0.000 ‐8.850 443 J 0 ‐6.35 0 ‐6.57
90 J 0 ‐7.610 0.000 ‐8.850 443 I 0 ‐6.15 0 ‐6.37
91 I 0 ‐7.580 0.000 ‐8.840 445 J 0 ‐6.38 0 ‐7.8
91 J 0 ‐7.360 0.000 ‐8.860 445 I 0 ‐6.17 0 ‐7.45
92 I 0 ‐7.340 0.000 ‐8.850 447 J 0 ‐6.39 0 ‐5.45
92 J 0 ‐7.170 0.000 ‐8.930 447 I 0 ‐6.18 0 ‐5.57
93 I 0 ‐7.170 0.000 ‐8.930 449 J 0 ‐6.22 0 ‐6.06
93 J 0 ‐7.060 0.000 ‐9.080 449 I 0 ‐6.04 0 ‐6.1
94 I 0 ‐7.060 0.000 ‐9.070 451 J 0 ‐7.99 0 ‐7.69
94 J 0 ‐7.160 0.000 ‐8.940 451 I 0 ‐9.64 0 ‐8.89
95 I 0 ‐7.170 0.000 ‐8.930 453 J 0 ‐8.07 0 ‐8.02
95 J 0 ‐7.330 0.000 ‐8.860 453 I 0 ‐9.68 0 ‐8.9
96 I 0 ‐7.350 0.000 ‐8.860 455 J 0 ‐8.09 0 ‐8.94
96 J 0 ‐7.570 0.000 ‐8.850 455 I 0 ‐9.69 0 ‐9.79
97 I 0 ‐7.590 0.000 ‐8.850 457 J 0 ‐8.1 0 ‐7.19
97 J 0 ‐8.180 0.000 ‐8.850 457 I 0 ‐9.7 0 ‐8.5
98 I 0 ‐8.210 0.000 ‐8.860 459 J 0 ‐8.01 0 ‐7.59
98 J 0 ‐9.260 0.000 ‐8.680 459 I 0 ‐9.63 0 ‐8.86
99 I 0 ‐9.280 0.000 ‐8.720 461 J 0 ‐6.22 0 ‐6.06
99 J 0 ‐8.140 0.000 ‐8.800 461 I 0 ‐6.4 0 ‐6.04
100 I 0 ‐8.140 0.000 ‐8.790 463 J 0 ‐6.38 0 ‐6.5
100 J 0 ‐7.720 0.000 ‐9.040 463 I 0 ‐6.57 0 ‐6.72
101 I 0 ‐7.600 0.000 ‐9.040 465 J 0 ‐6.38 0 ‐7.81
101 I 0 ‐7.730 0.000 ‐9.230 465 J 0 ‐6.56 0 ‐8.2
102 I 0 ‐7.640 0.000 ‐9.230 467 J 0 ‐6.35 0 ‐5.46
102 I 0 ‐7.690 0.000 ‐9.410 467 J 0 ‐6.53 0 ‐5.36
103 I 0 ‐7.630 0.000 ‐9.420 469 J 0 ‐6.19 0 ‐6.08
103 I 0 ‐7.610 0.000 ‐9.590 469 J 0 ‐6.36 0 ‐6.06
104 I 0 ‐7.580 0.000 ‐9.600 471 J 0 ‐8.69 0 ‐7.94
104 I 0 ‐7.650 0.000 ‐9.410 471 J 0 ‐6.46 0 ‐5.46
105 I 0 ‐7.660 0.000 ‐9.420 473 J 0 ‐8.79 0 ‐7.91
105 I 0 ‐7.650 0.000 ‐9.230 473 J 0 ‐6.61 0 ‐6.21
106 I 0 ‐7.690 0.000 ‐9.230 475 J 0 ‐8.78 0 ‐8.88
106 I 0 ‐7.610 0.000 ‐9.040 475 J 0 ‐6.6 0 ‐7.37
107 I 0 ‐7.690 0.000 ‐9.040 477 J 0 ‐8.76 0 ‐7.53
107 I 0 ‐8.140 0.000 ‐8.790 477 J 0 ‐6.57 0 ‐5.11
108 I 0 ‐8.140 0.000 ‐8.800 479 J 0 ‐8.67 0 ‐7.96
108 I 0 ‐9.300 0.000 ‐8.560 479 J 0 ‐6.43 0 ‐5.48

13
Des. Rev.

0
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
Design of Girder Sections
Ultimate Limit State (ULS)
Limit state of flexure
a) Section at Mid‐sapn 
Design moment at ULS = 11252 kNm

Area of tension steel at mid span

Area of a single tendon = 98.8 mm2


Total Number of Tendons 19+19+12+12 = = 62 Nos
Area of Prestressing steel As = 6126 mm2
C.G. of tension steel from bottom = 100 mm
Depth of C.G. of cables from top, d = 2130 ‐ 100 = 2030 mm
Cl.7.6.1.2 of  Effecive width of top flange, b f = 3000 mm
IRC:112‐2011 Thickness of flange, h f = 200 mm
Area of tensile steel, As = 6126 mm2
Breaking load of Strand = 184 kN 
Breaking stress = 1859 N/mm2
Ultimate tensile force resisted by reinforcement at section = 8617 kN 
3000  f cd
230

C 0 0 =0.8Xu
(d-0.8Xu/2)
2130
2030

T
600
Considering the rectangular stress block diagram
Cl. A2.9 of  C =   f cd .  .x u. b f. =1x22.3x0.8Xu x 3000
IRC:112‐2011 Neutral Axis Depth, xu = 161 mm
Ultimate compressive force resisted by concrete at section

As the neutral axis is within the flange, the procedure is
same as that of a rectangular section
Strain at top fibre due to external moment = 0.0035
Total Strain in steel at a depth of effective depth  s1  = 0.005 + (  c1 /x u )(d‐x u ) = 0.0406
Failure strain in steel (0.87f yp /E s )+0.001 = 0.0032
As the failure strain in steel is less than the strain at ultimate state
the section is under reinfoced
Moment resisting capacity of the section,
M Rd  = T.(d‐0.8x u /2) = 16937 kNm

As M u  < M Rd ,  the Section is O.K. for Ultimate Limit State.


Minimum Reinforcement Requirements
Tensile strength of concrete  f ctk,0.05 = 4.1 MPa
I = 1.1089E+12 mm4
y = 1398 mm
Cracking bending moment M rep  = f ctk .I/y = 3.25 MNm
2
Actual area of reinforcement As = 6126 mm
Lever arm at ULS d = 2030 mm
2
Minimum area of reinforcement A smin  = M rep /d.f pd = 3683 mm
A s  >> A smin

14
Des. Rev.

0
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations

Check for Moment Resisting Capacity of Critical Girder for Sagging Mom

0.00 2.30 3.50 5.64 7.98 10.32 12.66 15.00


0.00 2.30 3.50 5.64 7.98 10.32 12.66 15.00

8926 10468 11384 11669


8600 10089 10974 11252

MRd kNm 11216 11224 11414 12000 12991 14464 15300 16937

8600 10089 10974 11252


10.32 12.66 15.00
10.32 12.66 15.00
1366 1367 1389 1457 1572 1743 1840 2030
3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000

6126 6126 6126 6126 6126 6126 6126 6126

8617 8617 8617 8617 8617 8617 8617 8617

1646 2959 4675 5840 6169 6351 5876


1305 1316 1370 1473 1635 1728 1915

1170 2104 3323 4152 4385 4515 4177


(mm2) 6126 4955 4022 2802 1974 1740 1611 1949
225

161 161 161 161 161 161 161

110
225

119
Calculation of Required Longitudinal Steel of Critical Girder
225

115
7.98
7.98

225

109

6648
6404

6404
5.64
5.64

225

87

4045
3896

3896
3.50
3.50

225

55

2230
2148

2148
2.30
2.30

225

31
0.00
0.00

225

xu (mm) 161

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
As (mm2)

(mm)

(mm)

(mm2)
MEd kNm

kNm

kNm
d (mm)
bf (mm)

hf (mm)

kN

kN
Section at

Section at
X(m)

X(m)
T

Astall.
MOR
MEd

Ast
xu
T
z
Geometrical Mom. 
Properties Resist.

6.2.2. Limit state of shear and torsion
Ultimate Design SF at section  0.00 m from support of critical Girder
Design utimate shear force, V Ed = 1061 kN
Torsional moment, T Ed = 165 kNm
Effective web width, b w,eff  = b w ‐ (2/3)*  duct = 633 mm
Effective depth of web, d = 1366 mm
i) Resistance of outer webs without shear reinforcement:
Coeff, K = 1+(200/d)^0.5    (but, <=2.0) = 1.38
Percentage tensile steel in web,   1  = 100A sl /b w .d  (but, <=0.02) = 0.02 %
Design shear resistance w/o shear reinforcement,
 Rdc  = [0.12K(80  1 .f ck ) 0.33 ]
2
Eqn.10.1 of  = 0.705 N/mm
 Rdc,min  = [0.031K 3/2 (f ck ) 1/2 ]
2
IRC:112‐2011 = 0.356 N/mm
VEd > VRdc
The girder section is not be justified with the minimum reinforcement section. It is thus
necessary to foresee and dimension shear reinforcement and to check the section.

ii) Design for Shear Reinforcement:
 cw = 1
ν = 0.6 [1 ‐fck/310] = 0.503
ν1 = 0.600
2
Design Shear stress d of Interior Girder ed = Ved/(bw 0.9d) = 1.363 N/mm
Rd.max = cw v1 fcd / (cot  + tan )
2
Rd.max(21.8) = 4.650 N/mm
2
Rd.max(45) = 6.750 N/mm
Strut Angle =  = 0.5 sin‐1 (Ed / ( v fck) ) = 21.8 Deg
Assume Struct Angle,  = 26.0 Deg
Asw / s = Ed bw/  fywd cot  Asw/s = 1.070 mm2/mm
Asw‐min / s = 0.072  bw fck0.5/fyk Asw‐min/s = 0.713 mm2/mm
Asw‐reqd/s = 1.070 mm2/mm

15
Des. Rev.

0
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
Additional Longitudinal Force due to Shear Force Ftd = 0.5 VEd cot = 1088 kN
2
Additional Longitudinal Steel Requied for Shear Ast‐add =Ftd / fyd = 2500 mm

iii) Design for Torsion combined with Shear:
3000

230

230
1 1

1900
633
Torsional Stiffness of Rectangle, J = ab3 (1/3‐0.21 b/a (1‐b4/12a4))
a = larger dimension
b = smaller dimension
Torsional Stiffness of Top Slab = 0.005
Torsional Stiffness of Top Flange = 0.000
Torsional Stiffness of Web = 0.147
Torsional Stiffness of Bottom Flange = 0.000
Total Torsional Stiffness of section = 0.151
Torsional moment shared by Top Slab = 4.92 kNm
Torsional moment shared by Web = 159.98 kNm

Area of Web 633 x 2130 = 1.3E+06 mm2


Perimeter of Web 2 x (633 + 2130) = 5.5E+03 mm
10.5.2 of tefi = A/u 
IRC:112‐2011 = 244.0 mm
Ak = (Bw‐tefi) x (D‐tefi)
Ak for Web = 7.3E+05 mm2
 = 26.0 Deg.
cot  = 2.05
Eqn 10.8 V Rd,max  = cw .b w .z t . . f cd /( cot + tan ) = 3441 kN
Eqn 10.48 T Rd,max = 2  cw .  .f cd .A k .t et,w . sin  cos  = 1887 kNm
Eqn.10.47 of  V Ed /V Rd.max  + T Ed /T Rd.max = 1061 / 3441 + 159.98 / 18= 0.393 <= 1
IRC:112‐2011 Section is adequate for Combined Torsion and Shear
Additional Stirrup for Torsion A st /st = T Ed /(2A k  f ywd  cot ) = 0.122 mm2
2
Total Stirrup Reinforcement Requirement = 1.07 +  0.122 = 1.314 mm

Eqn 10.49  Additional Longitudinal Steel for Torsion A sl /u k  = TEd cotuk/(Ak fyd) = 3769 mm2

16
Des. Rev.

0
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
iv) Calculation of Transverse Shear Reinforcement in Deck slab & Flange:
C8.3.4 of Change in normal longitudinal force at junction of web and flnage/unit length,
IRC:SP:105‐
2015 Longitudinal Shear Stress vEd =  VED / z hf * (beff Flange on One Side / Btotal Flange)
For Exterior girder at support section
vEd = 1 x 1061 x 1000 / (0.9 x 1366 x 230) x (0.5 x 2300/3000) = 1.438 N/mm2
0.4fctd = 0.765 N/mm2
Transverse Shear Reinforcement to be provided
vEd = 1 fck / 1.5(cotf + tanf)
vEd (26.5) = 7.986 N/mm2
vEd (45) = 10.000 N/mm2
Strut angle f = 26.50 Deg
Transverse Reinforcement Asf / sf = vEd hf / fyd cotf Asf = 0.379 mm2/mm

v) Calculation of Interface Shear Reinforcement in Deck slab & Flange:
At ULS the rectangular stress block is within the depth of cast‐in‐situ deck slab
Hence the ratio of long. compressive force in deck slab to that of total,   = 1.0
C8.3.3 of Design shear force at section, V Ed = 203 kN
IRC:SP:105‐
2015 Lever arm of composite section z = 1229 mm
Width of interface  bi = 800 mm
2
Interface area Ai = 800000 mm
Interface shear stress v Edi  =   .V Ed /(z.b i ) = 0.206 MPa
Cl.10.3.4 of  Assuming a 'smooth'  surface at interface  = 0.60
IRC:112‐2011 Minimum normal stress on interface surface (DL of deck slab) h = 0.000 MPa
 = 90 
2
Minimum interface shear reinforcement is 0.15% of interface area = 1200 mm
Provide 2 L  12 @ 100 c/c as rings in top flange and deck slab As = 2262 mm2
2
Reserve reinforecment area provided with web stirrups = 3210 mm
2
Total reinforcment area provided across the interface area =2262+3210 = 5472 mm
2
Minimum Steel 0.15/100 x 800000 = 1200 mm
 =  A s /A i = 0.0068
Eqn.10.6  = 0.6(1‐f ck /310) = 0.503 REINF. FOR

Eqn.10.21 of  Design shear resistance at interface, INTERFACE


IRC:112‐2011 v Rdi  = minimum of ( . h + f yd ( sin +cos fcd) = 1.811 MPa SHEAR IS

As vEdi < vRdi, reinforcement provided is O.K. DESIGNED

17
Ref.

Design for Shear & Torsion of Critical Girder Design for Shear & Torsion of Critical Girder
X= 0.000 2.300 3.500 5.640 7.980 10.320 12.660 15.000
VRdmax kN 3805 3808 1964 1623 1752 1942 2050 2262 X= 0.00 2.30 3.50 5.64 7.98 10.32 12.66 15.00
TRdmax kNm 1889 1889 242 242 242 242 242 242 bw (mm) 700 700 280 280 280 280 280 280
VEd/VRd.max+TEd/TRd.max 0.364 0.551 0.940 0.960 0.769 0.602 0.488 0.312 bweff (mm) 633 633 213 213 213 213 213 213
Ast/st mm2/mm 0.122 0.275 0.239 0.210 0.167 0.129 0.097 0.067 A (m2) 1.349 1.349 0.454 0.454 0.454 0.454 0.454 0.454
2
As/s mm /mm 1.314 1.932 1.688 1.501 1.203 0.944 0.775 0.489 u m 5.527 5.527 4.687 4.687 4.687 4.687 4.687 4.687
Stirrup  mm 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 tef,i mm 244 244 97 97 97 97 97 97
Spacing 100 100 100 100 125 125 150 150 Ak m2 0.734 0.734 0.237 0.237 0.237 0.237 0.237 0.237
Legs Nos 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 kN 1061 1373 1028 963 835 731 654 441

Reinf for Long Shear & Torsion
VEd(V)
As/s (Prov) mm2/mm 4.52 4.52 2.26 2.26 1.81 1.81 1.51 1.51 TEd Total kNm 165 371 200 176 140 108 81 56
Vedintr kN 203 752 625 573 488 417 355 294 Ixx Deck m4 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005
 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ixx Top  m4 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
2
Edi N/mm 0.206 0.764 0.625 0.546 0.431 0.332 0.268 0.201 Ixx Web m4 0.147 0.147 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006
Stirrup  mm 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Ixx Bot Fl m4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Spacing mm 100 100 100 100 125 125 150 150 TEd Deck kN 4.9 11.1 83.6 73.6 58.5 45.2 33.9 23.4
Legs Nos 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 TEd Top  kN 0.1 0.2 8.6 7.6 6.1 4.7 3.5 2.4

18
Calculations

Reserve Aswmm2 3210 2591 574 761 607 866 733 1019 TEd Web kN 160.0 359.7 100.8 88.7 70.6 54.4 40.8 28.2
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950

As‐inter mm2 5472 4853 2836 3023 2416 2675 2241 2527 TEd Bot  kN 0.0 0.0 6.9 6.1 4.8 3.7 2.8 1.9
Asmin‐inter mm2 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 dw mm 1366 1367 1389 1457 1572 1743 1840 2030
 0.0068 0.0061 0.0035 0.0038 0.0030 0.0033 0.0028 0.0032 Ed N/mm2 1.363 1.762 3.855 3.442 2.767 2.184 1.851 1.131
Rdi N/mm2 1.811 1.606 0.978 1.000 0.799 0.885 0.742 0.836 Rd,max(22) N/mm2 4.650 4.650 4.650 4.650 4.650 4.650 4.650 4.650

Interface Shear Reinf. b/w Girder and Deck slab
Rdi >Edi Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Rd,max(45) N/mm2 6.750 6.750 6.750 6.750 6.750 6.750 6.750 6.750
2
Edf N/mm 1.438 1.860 1.621 1.447 1.163 0.918 0.778 0.476 act Deg. 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8
f Deg. 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 design Deg. 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26
2 2

Flange
Asf/sf mm /mm 0.379 0.490 0.427 0.382 0.307 0.000 0.000 0.000 Asw/s mm /mm1.069 1.383 1.210 1.081 0.869 0.686 0.581 0.355

Shear b/w web & 
Asf mm2 379 490 427 382 307 0 0 0 Asl_add mm2 2500 3236 2423 2269 1968 1723 1541 1039
TEd_Deck kNm 4.9 11.1 83.6 73.6 58.5 45.2 33.9 23.4 Asl_reqmnt mm2 Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
TEd_Top Fl kNm 0.1 0.2 8.6 7.6 6.1 4.7 3.5 2.4 long_bot mm 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Chk.
Des.

TEd_Web kNm 160.0 359.7 100.8 88.7 70.6 54.4 40.8 28.2 Nos 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Torsional 
Moment Sharing
TEd_Bot Fl kNm 0.0 0.0 6.9 6.1 4.8 3.7 2.8 1.9 long_bot mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Nos 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
0

Ast‐long_bmm2 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061


Rev.

Date

Mar‐23

Ast‐balancmm2 5686 3780 3660 2594 2067 2078 2130 2970


Ref.

Design for Shear & Torsion of Critical Girder
X= 0.000 2.300 3.500 5.640 7.980 10.320 12.660 15.000
2
A m 1.349 1.349 0.454 0.454 0.454 0.454 0.454 0.454
u m 5.527 5.527 4.687 4.687 4.687 4.687 4.687 4.687
tef,i mm 244 244 97 97 97 97 97 97
2
Ak m 0.734 0.734 0.237 0.237 0.237 0.237 0.237 0.237
2
Asl mm 2838 6382 4707 4142 3295 2542 1906 1318

Web
Dia(side) /  16 12 16 26 16 22 16 20 16 16 16 12 16 10 16 6

Design of End Anchorages
Dia(top) / Nos. 12 4 12 8 12 4 12 4 12 2 12 2 12 2 12 2
Asl  2
mm 360 808 281 247 197 152 114 79
(Bot)
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
2
A m 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69
u m 6.46 6.46 6.46 6.46 6.46 6.46 6.46 6.46
tef,i mm 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107
2

Deck Slab
Ak m 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36

Design of End Anchorages and End Diaphragm
2
Asl mm 210 472 3573 3144 2501 1929 1447 1000
2
A m 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10

19
Calculations

u m 0.62 0.62 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38


Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950

2Y0

2Yp0
tef,i mm 32 32 76 76 76 76 76 76
2
Ak m 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
2
Asl mm 14 30 728 641 510 393 295 204

Fig. 9.1. End view of Anchorage
Dia / Nos. 12 2 12 2 12 8 12 6 12 6 12 4 12 4 12 2

Top Flange
Ast/s  2
mm 0.005 0.012 0.126 0.111 0.088 0.068 0.051 0.035
reqd
Legge
Dia 2 10 200 10 200 10 200 10 200 10 250 10 250 10 300 10 300
Ast/s 
d
2
mm 0.785 0.785 0.785 0.785 0.628 0.628 0.524 0.524
prov
2
A m 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08

u m 0.50 0.50 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19


tef,i mm 0 0 71 71 71 71 71 71
2
Ak m 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Chk.
Des.

2
Asl mm 0 0 380 334 266 205 154 106
Dia / Nos. 10 0 10 0 10 6 10 6 10 4 10 4 10 2 10 2
Bottom Flange

Ast/s mm2 0.000 0.000 0.118 0.104 0.083 0.064 0.048 0.033
Legge
0

10 200 10 200 10 200 10 200 10 250 10 250 10 300 10 300


Rev.

Date

Dia 2 d
Mar‐23

Spacin 2
mm 0.785 0.785 0.785 0.785 0.628 0.628 0.524 0.524
g
Des. Rev.

0
Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
a) Design of anti‐bursting steel
Cl. 13.2.3 of The concrete and reinforcement in end block shall be designed to transfer a load not less than 110% of
IRC:112‐2011 the nominal UTS of tendons it is expected to hold.
Breaking load of each strand = 183.71 kN
Number of Strands = 19 Nos
Design force at anchorage block Pk=1.1x19x183.71 = 3839.5 kN
Size of anchorage bearing plate 2Y p0 = 260 mm
Thickness of web slab 2Y 0 = 700 mm
Table 13.1 of The concentration ratio (2Y p0 /2Y 0 ) = 0.37 mm
IRC:112‐2011 The ratio b/w bursting force and cable force (F bst /P k ) = 0.24
Bursting force F bst =3839.5x0.24 = 921.5 kN
Required area of bursting steel in the plane perpendicular to web F st / s = 3686 mm 2
Here  s  should be limited to 250MPa in order to control the crack width
Sec. 26.7 of The anti‐bursting steel is provided partly in the from of: 1) a spiral (of length = Y 0 )
Ref. [11] placed touching the anchor face and 2) grill mesh distribted in the region 0.2Y 0  to 2Y 0  from face.
Ch. 6 of The detailing is such that to enclose a cylinder or prism with dimensions larger than 50mm
Ref. [9] larger than the base plate.
Size of prism =260+25+25 = 310 mm SPIRAL REINF.
Provide a spiral of bar   16 with pitch = 50 and length 400 A sh = 3215 mm2 #16‐50(p)/400(L)

Provide gr. mesh of bar   10 with grill spac 100 Nos. = 4 A sm = 973 mm2 MESH REINF.


Total area of anti‐bursting steel provided in the plane perpendicular to slab/web = 4189 mm 2 #10@100
In the plane parallel to the web, the ratio (2Y p0 /2Y 0 ) being larger, the magnitude of
bursting force is less. Hence, the same mesh reniforcement is provided in this plane.

b) Design of anti‐spalling steel
The force causing spalling out of concrete behind base plate shall be estimated
as equal to 4% of the Cable force.
Anti‐spalling reinf. required around the anchorage A 2  = 0.04P k / s = 512 mm2
Here  s  should be limited to 300MPa in order to control the crack width
This shall be distributed around the anchorages ANTI‐SPALLNG
2
Provide # 12 Nos. 5 on each direction = 565 mm #12‐5Nos.

20
Des. Rev.

Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
6.2 Design of End Diaphragm
a) DL due to Self weight:
Cross sectional area of End Diaphragm = 0.660 m2
UDL due to self weight = 0.66x25 = 16.50 kN/m
Equivalent two concentrated loads due to self weight =16.5x3/2 = 24.8 kN
b) CWLL due to 70R Bogie Load:
Axle load of 400kN Bogie load  = 200 kN
Spacing of wheels in an axle = 1.2 m
c) Design Steel for Service Stage
i) Design Loads (At ULS):
Considering Basic load combination for sevice stage,
At node A =1.35x(24.8)+1.5x(200/2) = 183 kN
At node D =1.35x(24.8)+1.5x(200/2) = 183 kN
ii) Strut and Tie Method:
Distance between bearings = 3000 mm
Effective depth of beam =1900 + 230 ‐ 200 ‐ 57.5 = 1873 mm
183 183
1.2
A D

FAD 
1873

FBC
B C

3.000 3.000

183
Fig. 6.1 Strut and tie model for End Diaphragm
A simple strut and tie model shown in fig. consists of a strut AB (or CD) running from the applied force to 
support. Strut AD and tie BC are required to equilibrium the truss model.
As shwon in fig., these strut and tie form a force couple,  F uBC  = F uAD .
The position of of nodes, B & C are easy to define as the postion of tension steel can pre‐detrmined, 
but the vertical position of nodes A & D must be estimated or determined. To fully utilise the beam, 
the position of the nodes A & D have to be as close to the top of the beam. Thus the lever arm
z' of the force couple must be set maximum and this means that the width of strut AD,  w s  must be
minimum. To minimse  w s  , strut force in AD, F uAD  must reach in its capacity defined by
F uAD  = f cd .b.w s  =22.3x400x ws = 8920 ws
z = 1873 ‐ ws/2
0.900
183.5

A D FuAD ws

z
1.873
C
FuBC
B

183.5
Fi.g 9.3
Writing the moment equilibrium equation about  point C as described below
183.48x1000x 900 = FuAD x z

21
Des. Rev.

Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
=  8920 ws x( 1873 ‐ ws/2)
4460 ws2 ‐ 1.67E+07 ws + 2E+08 = 0
 ws =(16702700 ‐ SQRT(16702700^2‐4x4460x165132000))/(2x4460) = 10 mm
FuBC =8920 x 0.01 = 89 kN
FuBC = 89 kN
Area of steel required for tie, BC FuBC/s =89x1000 /300 = 297 mm2
Here  s  should be limited to 300MPa in order to control the crack width
2 BOT. REINF.
Minimum steel area required = 1498 mm
Provide 4 Nos.  # 25 in 1 row at bottom = 1963 mm 2 #25‐4Nos.EACH
IN 1 LAYER

d) Check reinforcement at Jack‐up Stage
i) Design Loads (At ULS): (without carraigeway live load)
Considering Accidental load combination for jack‐up stage,
At node A =1.35x(480+113)+1.75x(80) = 941 kN
At node C =1.35x(480)+1.75x(80) = 788 kN

Distance jack point from outer girder = 0.70 mm

941 788 941


3.000 3.000
A
1.873

B C

0.70

Fig. 9.4. End Diaphragm

Design Hogging Bending Moment M Ed = 737.0 kNm


Design Sagging Bending Moment M Ed = 150.2 kNm
Effective depth of girder d = 1873 mm
Width of girder b = 400 mm

Equal Jack Force Condition ‐ Maximum Hogging Moment = 305.9 kNm


Equal Jack Force Condition ‐ Maximum sagging Moment = 312.4 kNm
ii) Design of Reinforcement for Hogging Moment:
k u  = M Ed /f ck .bd 2 = 0.013
k u,lim  for Fe 500 = 0.166
As k u  is less than k u,lim  the section is under reinforced
z = d/2(1+sqrt(1‐4.64k u )) = 1844 mm
z min  = 0.74d = 1386 mm
z max  = 0.95d = 1779 mm
z = 1779 mm
Area of tensile steel required, A st  = M Ed /zf yd = 952 mm2
2 TOP REINF.
Minimum steel area required = 1168 mm
Provide 0 Nos.  # 20 in 1 row at top face and
4 Nos.  # 20 in 1 row at top face = 1256 mm 2 #20‐4Nos.EACH
ii) Design of Reinforcement for Sagging Moment:

22
Des. Rev.

Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
M Ed = 312 kNm
k u  = M Ed /f ck .bd 2 = 0.006
k u,lim  for Fe 500 = 0.166
As k u  is less than k u,lim  the section is under reinforced
z = d/2(1+sqrt(1‐4.64k u )) = 1860 mm
z min  = 0.74d = 1386 mm
z max  = 0.95d = 1779 mm
z = 1779 mm
Area of tensile steel required, A st  = M Ed /zf yd = 404 mm2
2 TOP REINF.
Minimum steel area required = 1168 mm
4 Nos.  # 25 in 1 row provided at bottom face is OK = 1963 mm 2 #25‐4Nos.EACH

e) Design for shear IN 1 LAYER

i) Design Load (At ULS):
a) At service stage:
Design shear force VEd = 183 kN
Effective depth d = 1873 mm
Shear span av = 900 mm
Cl.6.2.3(8) Thickness of diaphragm = 400 mm
BSEN1992‐1‐1 As a v  < 0.5d, a v  = 0.5d av = 700 mm
Cl.10.3.3.3(7) Reduced VEd V Ed (a v /d) = 69 kN
IRC:112‐2011 b) At Jack‐up stage:
Design shear force VEd = 765 kN
Equal Jack Force Condition ‐ Maximum shear force = 640 kN
Effective depth d = 1873 mm
Shear span av = 700 mm
Cl.6.2.3(8) Thickness of diaphragm = 400 mm
BSEN1992‐1‐1 As a v  < 0.5d, a v  = 0.5d av = 700 mm
Cl.10.3.3.3(7) Reduced VEd V Ed (a v /d) = 547 kN
IRC:112‐2011 ii) Vertical shear reinforcement:
Design shear force max. of (69,546.65) = 547 kN
2
Cl.10.3.3.3(8) Area of vertical shear steel required VEd/fydw = 1257 mm VERTICAL
IRC:112‐2011 This reinforcemnet to be distributed in 0.75a v SHEAR REINF.
Provide # 12 @ 100 as 4 legged stirrups = 1526 mm2 #12@100
iii) Horizontal shear reinforcement:
Cl.16.7.1(3) As a v  < 0.5d,  horizontal links are to be provided
2
IRC:112‐2011 Area of horizontal links required A s,link  = 0.25A s.main = 314 mm HORIZONTAL
This reinforcement to be distributed in the upper (2/3)d SHEAR REINF.
Provide # 10 @ 150 as links (horizontal) = 490 mm2 #10@150

23
Des. Rev.

Design of PSC Girder for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
6.3 Design of Lifting Hook
i) Design of bar size:
Table 6.2 Self weight of single I girder = 645.3 kN
Reaction at one end = 322.7 kN
Additional Impact load due to jerking during handling (Add 50% of DL) = 161.3 kN
Total factored reaction at one end at ULS R Ed  = 1.35DL = 653.4 kN LIFTING
Hook will fail in double shear A s,req  = R ed *(3)^0.5/(f yd* 2) = 1301 mm 2 HOOK DIA,
Provide # 25  2 No. Hook at one end A s,prov = 1963 mm 2 #25‐2No.
ii) Design of bond length: AT ONE END
Value of 'k' as per Table 15.4 of IRC:112‐2011 for   25 bar = 32
Basic anchorage length l b  = k.  = 800 mm
Value of '' as per Eq. 15.2 of IRC:112‐2011 for bars in tension = 0.7 LIFTING
Design anchorage length l b,net  =  .l b .(A s,req /A s,prov )   0.3l b = 371 mm HOOK LENG.
Achorage length provided 500 + 250 = 750 mm 750 MM
500

250

24
Des. Rev.

0
Design of Deck Slab
Chk. Date

Nov‐22
Ref. Calculations Output
7.0. Design of Deck Slab
7.1 Dead load and Superimposed dead load on deck slab (1m wide strip)
The transverse analysis is carried out using STAAD considering 1m wide strip of deck slab 
supported on girders and the loads are arrived as shown below:
7.1.1. Dead load of Deck slab:
Self weight of deck slab =0.23x25 = 5.75 kN/m 2

7.1.2. Superimposed Dead load on Deck slab:
i) due to weaing coat (WC):
Self weight of wearing coat = 2.0 kN/m2
ii) due to crash barrier (CB):
Self weight of crash barrier at tip of exterior deck slab =0.3x25 = 7.5 kN/m

7.5 2.00 5.75

1.25 3.0 3.0

Fig. 7.1. DL and SIDL on deck slab

7.3. Design BM and SF for deck slab
The input data from STAAD Pro. Results for the transverse analysis is presented in Annexure.
The output results are tabulated in Table 7.1 for the design BM and SF for deck slab.
Table 7.1 Summary of Transverse moments and shear forces 
Trans. BM(kNm) Shear Force(kN)
Int. 
Cant. deck 
Interior deck slab Cant. deck slab deck 
slab
slab
Load Case
deck 
deck  Cant. Cant.
deck slab slab
slab slab slab
girder

Hog. Sag. Hog.

Dead Load G1 2.1 1.9 4.5 6.8 7.3

SIDL (Crash barrier) G2 0.1 0.189 9.4 29.4 7.5

SIDL (Wearing coat) G2 0.7 0.644 1.6 2.4 2.5

Case‐2: 70R (Wheeled) 20.314 29.2 0.0 42.1 0.0

Case‐3: 40T Bogie G3 26.927 22.3 0.0 75.3 0.0

Case‐4: Class A (1L) 14.152 19.4 20.0 28.4 57.0

Case‐5:SPV 19.7 14.1 0.0 74.8 0.0

Des. B.M. & S.F.(ULS) 50.8 54.3 55.9 53.0 24.3

Des. B.M. & S.F. (SLS) ‐(a) 33.9 36.3 38.4 125.2 82.9

Des. B.M. & S.F. (SLS) ‐(b) 2.9 2.7 15.4 38.5 17.3

The combination of actions can be represented by the symbolic presentation as
Design bending moment, M u  =   G 1 .G 1  +   G2. G 2  +  Q. Q 1

Design shear force, V u  =   G 1 .G 1  +   G2. G 2  +  Q. Q 1

Table 3.3 of  1. Ultimate Limit State (for Verification of Strength)
IRC:112‐2011  G1 = 1.35  G2 = 1.75 Q = 1.5
2. Serviceability Limit State
a) Rare combination for Verification of Stresses
 G1 = 1.0  G2 = 1.0 Q = 1.00
b) Quasi Permanent combination for Verification of Crack width 
 G1 = 1.0  G2 = 1.0 Q = 0.00

25
Des. Rev.

0
Design of VUP at 541+804
Chk. Date

Nov‐22
Ref. Calculations Output
7.4 Deck Slab Reinforcements
7.4.1 Flexural Reinforcements for deck slab
K = M Ed /(f ck .bd 2 )
For singly reinforced section, K < K lim
where K lim  = 0.169 for f yk  = 500
Liver arm, z = (d/2).(1+sqrt(1‐4.44K))
Minimum value of 'z' for  under reinforced section, z min  = 0.75d
Maximum value of 'z' to avoid premature cracking of surface concrete, z max  = 0.95d
Area of steel required for flexure, A s  = M Ed /(z.f yd )
Min. steel required, A stmin  = 0.26*f ctm .b.d/f yk , > 0.0013bd

Reinforcement for transverse flexure and transverse shear shall be provided at
top face of the deck slab over the girders.

Table 7.2 Calculation of Flexural reinforcements
interior slab cantilever slab
Design  top face bot. face top face
para‐ unit
meters Section at Section at Section at
flange face mid‐span flange face
M Ed kNm ‐50.8 54.3 ‐55.9
d mm 184 184 184
K 0.037 0.040 0.041
K lim 0.169 0.169 0.169
K < K lim O.K. O.K. O.K.
z act mm 176 175 175
z min mm 138 138 138
z max mm 175 175 175
z  mm 175 175 175
A s,req mm2 668 714 735
A s,min mm2 287 287 287
Tables A s,trans.shear mm2 0 0 0
7.7.b & 7.8.b A s,total mm2 668 714 735
Main reinforcements

bar  mm 12 12 12
spacing mm 250 250 250
bar  mm 12 12 12
spacing mm 250 250 250
O.K O.K O.K
A s,prov mm2 904 904 904

 0.0049 0.0049 0.0049


Remarks O.K. O.K. O.K.
A s, distr mm2 181 181 181
A s, torsion
Distributors

mm2 0 0 0
bar  mm 10 10 10
spacing mm 200 200 200
A s,prov mm2 393 393 393
Remarks O.K. O.K. O.K.

26
Des. Rev.

0
Design of VUP at 541+804
Chk. Date

Nov‐22
Ref. Calculations Output
7.4.2 Shear checks for deck slab
Reduction factor to shear force,    = a v /(2d)
Design shear stress, v Ed  = V Ed /(b.d)
Tensile reinforcement ratio,  1  = Ast/(bd), <= 0.02
K = 1+sqrt(200/d), <= 2.0
Shear resistance without reinforcement, v Rdc  = 0.12K(80  1 f ck ) 0.33
Minimum shear resistance, v Rdc,min  = 0.035K 1.5 f ck 0.5

Table 7.3 Shear strength Verification
interior span
Section at cantilever span
flange face Section
V Ed kN 53.0 24.3

 1.0 1.0
V Ed,mod kN 53.0 24.3
d mm 184 184

v Ed MPa 0.288 0.132

 0.005 0.005
K 2.000 2.000
v Rdc,cal MPa 0.596 0.596
v Rdc,min MPa 0.626 0.626
v Rdc MPa 0.626 0.626 SHEAR
v Ed  < v Rdc O.K. O.K. O.K.
V  Ed,max kN 861 861
Remarks O.K. O.K.

7.4.3 Verification of Stress limits in deck slab at SLS
Cl.6.4.2.7 of Creep coefficient of Concrete in deck slabs
IRC:112‐2011 Age of concrete in years at the moment considered t = 100 years
Age of concrete at loading in days t0 = 29 days
Table 14.1 of Relative humidity RH = 70 %
IRC:112‐2011 Notional size, h0 = 2Ac/u 2x17500x230/(2x17500‐6x650) = 259 mm
Table 6.5 of Mean compressive strength, f cm = 50 MPa
IRC:112‐2011  ( f cm )=18.78/sqrt(f cm ) = 2.7
 (t 0 )=1/(0.1+t 0 0.20 ) = 0.49
Coefficients allowing for concrete strength, 1  = (43.75/f cm ) 0.7 = 0.91
2  = (43.75/f cm ) 0.2 = 0.97
3  = (43.75/f cm ) 0.5 = 0.94
Factor allowing for RH  RH  = (1+(1‐(RH/100)  1 /(0.1h 0 0.33 ))   = 1.40
Notional creep coefficint  0  =   RH .  (f cm ).  (t 0 ) = 1.80
Coeff. dependent on RH  H =1.5[1+(0.012RH) 18 ]h 0 +250  3  1500  3 = 1403
Facto allowing for concrete age at loading,  c (t,t 0 ) = ((t‐t 0 )/(  H +t‐t 0 )) 0.3 = 0.99
Creep coefficient  (t,t 0 ) =   0 .  c (t,t 0 ) = 1.78
Creep coefficient = 1.78
Modified values of concrete modulus:

i) At opening to traffic
Effective modulus of concrete,  E c,eff  = E cm = 33.0 GPa

Effective modular ratio, =  E s /E c,eff = 6.1

ii) At long term
Effective modulus of concrete, E c,eff  = E cm /(1+φ) = 11.9 GPa

Effective modular ratio, =  E s /E c,eff = 16.9

27
Des. Rev.

0
Design of VUP at 541+804
Chk. Date

Nov‐22
Ref. Calculations Output
Properties of uncracked section:
Depth of N.A., x u  = bh 2 /2 + ( e ‐1)(A s d+A s ' . d' )/(bh+( e ‐1)(A s +A s '))
M.I. about N.A., I u =bh 3 /12+bh(h/2‐x u ) 2 +(α e ‐1)[A s (d‐x u ) 2 +A s '(x u ‐d') 2 ]

Cracking moment, M cr = f ctm I u/(h  – x u)


Properties of cracked section:
     '
 '      'd'/d
Depth of N.A., x c  =(sqrt    '  )d
M.I. about N.A.,   c  bx c 3 /3+bd    (d‐x c ) 2 +(  e ‐1)  ' (x c ‐d') 2

Max. stress in concrete for Design bending moment,   c  = M Ed .x u /I u  OR M Ed .x c /I c


Cl.12.2.1 Max. stress in steel for Design bending moment,  s  =  e M Ed .(d‐x u )/I u  OR  e M Ed .(d‐x c )/I c
Cl.12.2.2 Limiting stress in cncrete for Rare combination = 0.48f ck
IRC:112‐2011 Limiting stress in steel for Rare combination = 0.8f yk

Table 7.4 Verification of stress limits
interior slab cantilever slab
Design  top face bot. face top face
para‐ unit
meters Section at Section at Section at
flange face mid‐span flange face
M Ed kNm 33.9 36.3 38.4
h mm 230 230 230
d mm 184 184 184
d' mm 46 46 46
As mm 2 904 904 904
 0.0049 0.0049 0.0049
As' mm2 0 0 0
' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Stage:* A B A B A B

E c,eff GPa 33.0 11.9 33.0 11.9 33.0 11.9

 6.06 16.86 6.06 16.86 6.06 16.86


xu mm 116 119 116 119 116 119
Uncracked

Iu mm4 1.E+09 1.E+09 1.E+09 1.E+09 1.E+09 1.E+09

M cr kNm 27.2 29.1 27.2 29.1 27.2 29.1


M Ed  < M cr No No No No No No
 0.03 0.08288 0.0297866 0.083 0.029787 0.0828766
Cracked

' 0.03 0.08288 0.0297866 0.083 0.029787 0.0828766


xc mm 40 61 40 61 40 61
Ic mm 1.E+08 3.E+08 1.E+08 3.E+08 1.E+08 3.E+08

c MPa 10.0 6.8 10.7 7.2 11.3 7.7

 c,limit MPa 19.2 19.2 19.2 19.2 19.2 19.2


Stresses

s MPa 220 229 235 245 249 260

 s,limit MPa 400 400 400 400 400 400

Remarks O.K. O.K. O.K. O.K. O.K. O.K.

*Stage: A ‐ stage at opening to traffic
Stage: B ‐ stage at long term

28
Des. Rev.

0
Design of VUP at 541+804
Chk. Date

Nov‐22
Ref. Calculations Output
7.4.4 Verification of Crack width of deck slab at SLS
Coefficients k1 = 0.8
k2 = 0.5
kt = 0.5
Effective diameter,    =   eff  = (n 1  1 2 +n 2  2 2  n 1  1  n 2  2 
Height of eff. tension area, h eff  = min. of (2.5(h‐d), (h‐x c )/3, h/2)
Effective tension area in concrete, A c,eff  = b.h eff
Eq. 12.7  P,eff  = A s /A c,eff
Eq. 12.8 If spacing of bars, s   5(c+ /2), maximum crack spacing,   S r,max  = 3.4c + 0.425k 1 k 2 (  /  P,eff )
Cl.12.3.4(3) If spacing of bars, s  > 5(c+ /2), Maximum crack spacing,   S r,max  = 1.3(h‐x c )
IRC:112‐2011 Stress in tensile reinforcement, sc  = M ed  (d‐x c ) / I c )
Effective Mean value of concrete tensile strength, f ct,eff  = f ctm
Mean strain in the reinforcement,  sm
Mean strain in concrete between cracks,   cm
Eq. 12.6 of  sm -  cm  = ( sc  ‐ k t (f ct,eff / p,eff )(1+ e . p,eff ))/E s   0.6 sc /E s
IRC:112‐2011 Crack width,  w k  = S rmax (  sm -  cm )
Table 7.5 Verification of crack width
interior slab cantilever slab
Design 
top face bot. face top face
para‐ unit
Section at Section at Section at
meters
flange face mid‐span flange face
M Ed kNm 2.9 2.7 15.4
M cr kNm 27.2 27.2 27.2
M Ed  < M cr Uncracked Uncracked Uncracked
h mm 230 230 230
d  mm 184 184 184
1 mm 12 12 12
2 mm 12 12 12
 mm 12 12 12
s mm 125 125 125
c mm 40 40 40
5(c+ /2) mm 230 230 230
A st mm2 904 904 904
 6.06 6.06 6.06
xc mm 40 40 40
Ic mm4 1.3E+08 1.3E+08 1.3E+08
h eff mm 63 63 63
A c,eff mm2 63413 63413 63413
 P,eff 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143
S r,max mm 279 279 279
s MPa 19 17 100
f ct,eff MPa 3.0 3.0 3.0
 sm -  cm 0.00006 0.00005 0.00030
wk mm 0.02 0.01 0.08 CRACK WIDTH
w k,max * mm 0.30 0.30 0.30 O.K.

Table 12.1 of Remarks O.K. O.K. O.K.


IRC:112‐2011 (*as the tension surface is not exposed to atmposhere, exposure class is ' moderate ')

29
  DESIGN OF  SUBSTRUCTURE

30
    DESIGN OF ABUTMENT CAP & PIER CAP

31
Des. Rev.

0
Design of Cap for Abutment for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
1.0. Material Properties
1.1. Concrete
Grade of concrete = M40
Characteristic compressive strength at 28 days f ck = 40 MPa
Eq. 6.3 of Characteristic compressive strength at 14 days = 36 MPa
IRC:112:2011 Characteristic compressive strength at 7 days = 31 MPa
Cl. 6.4.2.8 of Partial factor on strength of concrete c = 1.5
IRC:112:2011  cc = 0.67
 ct = 0.67
Design compressive strength of concrete,  f cd =  cc .f ck /  c = 17.867 MPa
Table 6.5 of Mean tensile strength of concrete,  f ctm = 3 MPa
IRC:112:2011

Modulus of Elasticity (design value) E cm = 33 GPa
Unit weight of concrete = 25 kN/m3 
1.2. Reinforcing steel
Characteristic strength of longitudinal steel f yk = 500 MPa
Characteristic strength of shear steel f ykw = 500 MPa
Cl. 6.2.2 of Partial factor on strength of steel s = 1.15
IRC:112:2011 Design yield strength of longitudinal steel,  f yd = f yk /  s = 435 MPa
Design yield strength of shear steel,  f ywd = f ykw /  s = 435 MPa
Cl.6.2.2 of Modulus of Elasticity (design value) ES = 200 GPa
IRC:112:2011 Clear cover to reinforcing steel (for 'SEVERE' exposure condition) = 45 mm

2.0 Dimensional Details of  Pier Cap
Width of  Pier Cap Bpc = 2000 mm
Length of  Pier Cap Lpc = 17500 mm
Max Depth of  Pier Cap Dmax = 1800 mm
Min Depth of  Pier Cap Dmin = 900 mm
Diameter of Pier Dpier = 1500 mm
Width of Equivalent square apier = 1329 mm
Depth of Diaphragm = 0 mm
Length of Diaphragm = 0 mm
17500

1250 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 1250


900

2750 4500

1500

32
Des. Rev.

0
Design of Cap for Abutment for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
4.0 Design of  Pier Cap under Ultimate Limit State
4.1 Design Moments & Forces
Load Combination considered for the verifications of structural strength at ULS is
1.35(SW)
Design Hogging Moment = 11453.00 kNm
Design Sagging Moment = 100.00 kNm
Design Shear Force @ interior girder point = 3982.00 kN
Design Shear Force @ exterior girder point = 1730.00 kN
Torsional Moment @ face of Interior Girder = 1324.00 kNm
Torsional Moment @ face of Exterior Girder = 835.00 kNm

4.2 Design for Flexure
4.2.1 Flexural Design for Top Reinforcement
K = M Ed /(f ck .bd 2 )
For singly reinforced section, K < K lim
where K lim  = 0.169 for f yk  = 500
Liver arm, z = (d/2).(1+sqrt(1‐4.44K))
Minimum value of 'z' for  under reinforced section, z min 0.75d
Maximum value of 'z' to avoid premature cracking of surface concrete, z m0.95d
Area of steel required for flexure, A s  = M Ed /(z.f yd )
Min. steel required, A stmin  = 0.26*f ctm .b.d/f yk , > 0.0013bd
Effective Depth of  cap 1800 ‐ 45‐ 22.625 = 1732 mm
K = 0.0477
Klim = 0.1690
Lever Arm, z = 1635 mm
zmin = 0.75 d = 1299 mm
zmax = 0.95 d = 1646 mm
zdes = 1635.19 mm
Ast‐req = 16101 mm2
Ast‐min = 5405 mm2
Ast‐des = 16101 mm2
Provide 45.25 mm  12 Nos on Top Face Ast‐prov = 19298 mm2 OK
Provide 20 mm  16 Nos on Bottom Face Ast‐prov = 5026.55 mm2

4.2.2 Design for Shear & Torsion
Effective height, d= Maximum height ‐( Dia of main reinforcement /2)‐  dia of distribution reinf ‐cover
lever arm, Z = d ‐((A s,prov  x 0.87 x f yk  /    0.45 x f ck  x b)/2)
where, f yd  ‐  Design yield strength of reinforcement(MPa)
f ck ‐  Grade of Concrete (MPa)
IRC 112‐2011   = Strength reduction factor for concrete cracked i = 0.6 (1‐f ck /310) Mpa
Eqn 10.6  ‐ Angle of inclination of shear reinforcement
A - Total area of c/s within the outer perimeter
Ak ‐ Area enclosed by the centrelines of the connecting walls
t efi ‐ Effective wall thickness
IRC 112‐2011 V Rdmax ‐ Maximum value of shear resistan = cw b w z v 1 fcd
Eqn 10.8 αcw ‐ coeff taking into account of state of stress cot(  )+tan(  )
α cw= 1 Since  σ  cp  = 0 σ cp mean compressive strength
IRC 112‐2011 b w ‐ Minimum breadth of section
Eqn 10.48 T Rdmax ‐ Design torsional mom = 2 v 1  α cw  f cd  A k  t ef I  sin   cos 

33
Des. Rev.

0
Design of Cap for Abutment for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
Shear and torsional strength Verification
Both Span Case One Span Only Case
@ Int  @ Extr  @ Int  @ Extr 
Girder Gird Girder Gird
V Ed kN 3982 1730 288 480
T Ed kNm 0 0 1324 835
cw 1 1 1 1
bw mm 2000 2000 2000 2000
d mm 1733 833 1733 833
z mm 1709 809 1709 809
 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523
 45 45 45 45
A 3466000 1666000 3466000 1666000
tefi 456 417 456 417
Ak 1971540 659528 1971540 659528
V Rdmax kN 15954 7551 15954 7551
T Rdmax kN 8395 2565 8395 2565
Bar dia. mm 12 12 12 12
No. of legs 6 6 6 6
Shear reinf.

Spacing mm 125 125 125 125


Asw/s provmm2/mm 5.43 5.43 5.43 5.43
Asw/s reqdmm2/mm 5.36 4.92 1.82 1.82
O.K. O.K. O.K. O.K.
A sl  Addtn mm2 4577 1989 331 552
As,torsion mm2 0 0 772 1455
OK OK OK OK
Ved kN 3982 1730 288 480
Shear check

V Rd.s kN 4033 1909 4033 1909


V Rd kN 4033 1909 4033 1909
v Ed  < v Rd O.K. O.K. O.K. O.K.
V Ed /V rdmax
0.250 0.229 0.176 0.389
Torsi

+T Ed /T rdm
on 

< 1 O.K. O.K. O.K. O.K.

34
Des. Rev.

0
Design of Cap for Pier for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
1.0. Material Properties
1.1. Concrete
Grade of concrete = M35
Characteristic compressive strength at 28 days f ck = 35 MPa
Eq. 6.3 of Characteristic compressive strength at 14 days = 31 MPa
IRC:112:2011 Characteristic compressive strength at 7 days = 27 MPa
Cl. 6.4.2.8 of Partial factor on strength of concrete c = 1.5
IRC:112:2011  cc = 0.67
 ct = 0.67
Design compressive strength of concrete,  f cd =  cc .f ck /  c = 15.633 MPa
Table 6.5 of Mean tensile strength of concrete,  f ctm = 2.8 MPa
IRC:112:2011

Modulus of Elasticity (design value) E cm = 32 GPa
Unit weight of concrete = 25 kN/m3 
1.2. Reinforcing steel
Characteristic strength of longitudinal steel f yk = 500 MPa
Characteristic strength of shear steel f ykw = 500 MPa
Cl. 6.2.2 of Partial factor on strength of steel s = 1.15
IRC:112:2011 Design yield strength of longitudinal steel,  f yd = f yk /  s = 435 MPa
Design yield strength of shear steel,  f ywd = f ykw /  s = 435 MPa
Cl.6.2.2 of Modulus of Elasticity (design value) ES = 200 GPa
IRC:112:2011 Clear cover to reinforcing steel (for 'SEVERE' exposure condition) = 45 mm

2.0 Dimensional Details of  Pier Cap
Width of  Pier Cap Bpc = 3200 mm
Length of  Pier Cap Lpc = 17500 mm
Max Depth of  Pier Cap Dmax = 1800 mm
Min Depth of  Pier Cap Dmin = 900 mm
Diameter of Pier Dpier = 1500 mm
Width of Equivalent square apier = 1329 mm
Depth of Diaphragm = 0 mm
Length of Diaphragm = 0 mm
17500

1250 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 1250


900

2750 4500

1500

35
Des. Rev.

0
Design of Cap for Pier for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
4.0 Design of  Pier Cap under Ultimate Limit State
4.1 Design Moments & Forces
Load Combination considered for the verifications of structural strength at ULS is
1.35(SW)
Design Hogging Moment = 18105.00 kNm
Design Sagging Moment = 100.00 kNm
Design Shear Force @ interior girder point = 6435.00 kN
Design Shear Force @ exterior girder point = 2578.00 kN
Torsional Moment @ face of Interior Girder = 1307.00 kNm
Torsional Moment @ face of Exterior Girder = 708.00 kNm

4.2 Design for Flexure
4.2.1 Flexural Design for Top Reinforcement
K = M Ed /(f ck .bd 2 )
For singly reinforced section, K < K lim
where K lim  = 0.169 for f yk  = 500
Liver arm, z = (d/2).(1+sqrt(1‐4.44K))
Minimum value of 'z' for  under reinforced section, z min 0.75d
Maximum value of 'z' to avoid premature cracking of surface concrete, z m0.95d
Area of steel required for flexure, A s  = M Ed /(z.f yd )
Min. steel required, A stmin  = 0.26*f ctm .b.d/f yk , > 0.0013bd
Effective Depth of  cap 1800 ‐ 45‐ 22.625 = 1732 mm
K = 0.0539
Klim = 0.1690
Lever Arm, z = 1622 mm
zmin = 0.75 d = 1299 mm
zmax = 0.95 d = 1646 mm
zdes = 1621.73 mm
Ast‐req = 25664 mm2
Ast‐min = 8071 mm2
Ast‐des = 25664 mm2
Provide 45.25 mm  20 Nos on Top Face Ast‐prov = 32163 mm2 OK
Provide 28.28 mm  16 Nos on Bottom Face Ast‐prov = 10050.06 mm2

4.2.2 Design for Shear & Torsion
Effective height, d= Maximum height ‐( Dia of main reinforcement /2)‐  dia of distribution reinf ‐cover
lever arm, Z = d ‐((A s,prov  x 0.87 x f yk  /    0.45 x f ck  x b)/2)
where, f yd  ‐  Design yield strength of reinforcement(MPa)
f ck ‐  Grade of Concrete (MPa)
IRC 112‐2011   = Strength reduction factor for concrete cracked i = 0.6 (1‐f ck /310) Mpa
Eqn 10.6  ‐ Angle of inclination of shear reinforcement
A - Total area of c/s within the outer perimeter
Ak ‐ Area enclosed by the centrelines of the connecting walls
t efi ‐ Effective wall thickness
IRC 112‐2011 V Rdmax ‐ Maximum value of shear resistan = cw b w z v 1 fcd
Eqn 10.8 αcw ‐ coeff taking into account of state of stress cot(  )+tan(  )
α cw= 1 Since  σ  cp  = 0 σ cp mean compressive strength
IRC 112‐2011 b w ‐ Minimum breadth of section
Eqn 10.48 T Rdmax ‐ Design torsional mom = 2 v 1  α cw  f cd  A k  t ef I  sin   cos 

36
Des. Rev.

0
Design of Cap for Pier for Flyover at 0+950
Chk. Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations Output
Shear and torsional strength Verification
Both Span Case One Span Only Case
@ Int  @ Extr  @ Int  @ Extr 
Girder Gird Girder Gird
V Ed kN 6435 2578 288 480
T Ed kNm 0 0 1307 708
cw 1 1 1 1
bw mm 3200 3200 3200 3200
d mm 1729 829 1729 829
z mm 1694 794 1694 794
 0.532 0.532 0.532 0.532
 37 37 37 37
A 5532352 2652352 5532352 2652352
tefi 553 414 553 414
Ak 3111602 1154424 3111602 1154424
V Rdmax kN 21681 10163 21681 10163
T Rdmax kN 13769 3827 13769 3827
Bar dia. mm 12 12 12 12
No. of legs 6 6 6 6
Shear reinf.

Spacing mm 100 100 100 100


Asw/s provmm2/mm 6.78 6.78 6.78 6.78
Asw/s reqdmm2/mm 6.58 5.62 2.73 2.73
O.K. O.K. O.K. O.K.
A sl  Addtn mm2 9816 3932 440 733
As,torsion mm2 0 0 364 531
OK OK OK OK
Ved kN 6435 2578 288 480
Shear check

V Rd.s kN 6633 3109 6633 3109


V Rd kN 6633 3109 6633 3109
v Ed  < v Rd O.K. O.K. O.K. O.K.
V Ed /V rdmax
0.297 0.254 0.108 0.232
Torsi

+T Ed /T rdm
on 

< 1 O.K. O.K. O.K. O.K.

37
    DESIGN OF TRESTLE

38
Des Rev.

0
Design of Trestle at A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
1.0. DESIGN DATA
1.1. Geometrical Data (All dimensions in millimeters)
Diameter of Trestle = 1200 mm

1.2. Materials Data and Stress Parameters
Trestle
Unitweight of concrete (kN/m3) 25.0
Table 6.5 Grade of concrete M 40
 & 6.4.2 of Design compressive strength (MPa) f cd 18.00
IRC:112‐2011 Mean value of tensile strength (MPa) f ctm 3.00
Design value Modulus of Elasticity (GPa) E cd 33.0
Grade of reinforcement  Fe 500
Design yield strength of reinforcement(MPa) f yd 435
Clear cover 75

2.0. Design of Trestle 

2.1. Geometrical properties
Diameter of Trestle 1200 mm
Diameter of main bars = 25 mm MAIN BARS
Number of main bars = 22 Nos.  25 bars
Area of main steel As = 10799 mm2 22 Nos.
Maximum axial force on Trestle N Ed = 6541 kN
Minimum long. Steel area Max. of (0.1N Ed /f yd ,0.004A c ) = 4524 mm2
Moment of Inertia of Trestle section (I) = 0.102 m4
Young's Modulus of Concrete (E) = 32 GPa
Young's Modulus of Steel Reinforcement (Es) = 200 GPa

2.2. Verification of structural strength at ULS
Case I ‐ Maximum Axial Load 
Case II ‐ Minimum Axial Load 

Load Case I II
Axial force N Ed 6541 5707
Design BM M Ed 1645 1623
M Rd 3517 3441
M Ed <M Rd OK OK

2.4 Design for Shear
Cl 10.3.2 0f a) Section without Shear Reinforcement
IRC:112‐2011 Design Shear Force = 260 kN
Axial force = 6579 kN
cp = 3.600 MPa
Take effective depth d as 0.8 times the diameter of Trestle d = 960 mm
Effective Tension Area = 0.7 times gross concrete area bw d = 791681 mm2
K = 1+ (200/d)0.5 < 2.0 K = 1.456
1 = Asl / bw d < 0.02 1 = 0.014
min = 0.031 K1.5 fck0.5 min = 0.345 MPa
Rdc‐min = min + 0.15 cp Rdc‐min = 0.885 MPa
Rdc = 0.12 K (80 1 fck)0.33 + 0.15cp Rdc = 1.148 MPa
VRdc = 909 kN

39
Des Rev.

0
Design of Trestle at A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
Shear Reinforcement Not Required
2.5. Design of ties
Dia. of lateral steel is greater of 8mm and 25 / 4 = 12 mm
Pitch of lateral steel is lesser of 1200 OR 12x25 OR 150mm = 150 mm TIES
Provide 12 mm dia @ 150 mm c/c +  16 mm dia @ 1500mm c/c as lateral steel 12 @ 150

2.6. Verification of stress limits at SLS
Load Combinations considered for the check of stresses in Trestles under SLS are
I Live Load as Leading Load
II Temperature Load as Leading Load
III Wind Load as Leading Load

b)  Calculation of creep coefficient(short term):
Cl.6.4.2.7 of Age of concrete in years at the moment considered t = 0.3 years
IRC:112‐2011 Age of concrete at loading in days t0 = 14 days
Table 14.1 of Relative humidity RH = 79 %
Cross sectional area of Trestle Ac = 1.13 m2
u = 3.77 m
IRC:112‐2011 Notional size, h 0  = 2A c /u = 600 mm
Table 6.5 of Mean compressive strength, f cm = 50 MPa
IRC:112‐2011  ( f cm )=16.8/sqrt(f cm ) = 2.4
 (t 0 )=1/(0.1+t 0 0.20 ) = 0.56
Coeff. allowing for concrete strength, 1  = (35/f cm ) 0.7 = 0.78
2  = (35/f cm ) 0.2 = 0.93
3  = (35/f cm ) 0.5 = 0.84
Factor  for RH  RH  = (1+(1‐(RH/100)  1 /(0.1h 0 0.33 ))   = 1.12
Notional creep coefficint  0  =   RH .  (f cm ).  (t 0 ) = 1.48
 H =1.5[1+(0.012RH) 18 ]h 0 +250  3  1500  3 = 1255
Factor for age at loading,  c (t,t 0 ) = ((t‐t 0 )/(  H +t‐t 0 )) 0.3 = 0.45
Creep coefficient  (t,t 0 ) =   0 .  c (t,t 0 ) = 0.67
Calculation of creep coefficient(long term):
Cl.6.4.2.7 of Age of concrete in years at the moment considered t = 100 years
IRC:112‐2011 Age of concrete at loading in days t0 = 14 days
Table 14.1 of Relative humidity RH = 79 %
Cross sectional area of Trestle Ac = 1.13 m2
u = 3.77 m

40
Des Rev.

0
Design of Trestle at A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
IRC:112‐2011 Notional size, h 0  = 2A c /u = 600 mm
Table 6.5 of Mean compressive strength, f cm = 50 MPa
IRC:112‐2011  ( f cm )=16.8/sqrt(f cm ) = 2.4
 (t 0 )=1/(0.1+t 0 0.20 ) = 0.56
Coeff. allowing for concrete strength, 1  = (35/f cm ) 0.7 = 0.78
2  = (35/f cm ) 0.2 = 0.93
3  = (35/f cm ) 0.5 = 0.84
Factor  for RH  RH  = (1+(1‐(RH/100)  1 /(0.1h 0 0.33 ))   = 1.12
Notional creep coefficint  0  =   RH .  (f cm ).  (t 0 ) = 1.48
 H =1.5[1+(0.012RH) 18 ]h 0 +250  3  1500  3 = 1255
Factor for age at loading,  c (t,t 0 ) = ((t‐t 0 )/(  H +t‐t 0 )) 0.3 = 0.99
Creep coefficient  (t,t 0 ) =   0 .  c (t,t 0 ) = 1.46
c)  Section properties:
Diameter of Trestle d = 1200 mm
Cross sectional area of Trestle = 1.13 m2
Diameter of longitudinal bars = 25 mm
Spacing of bars = 143 mm
Area of reinforcements = 10799 mm2
Modulus of concrete,   E cm = 33 GPa
Effective modulus of concrete,  E c,eff  = E cm /(1+φ) = 19.80 GPa
Effective modulus of concrete,  E c,eff  = E cm /(1+φ) = 13.41 GPa
Effective modular ratio, (Short Term) =  E s /E c,eff = 10.100
Effective modular ratio, (Long Term) =  E s /E c,eff = 14.92
At uncracked stage:
Effective area A eff  = 0.785d 2  + (  e ‐1)(As+As') = 1281295 mm2
N.A. depth = 600 mm
Second M.I  about N.A., Iu = 1.729E+11 mm4
d)  Verification of stresses at critical section

Comb unit I II Remarks


NEd kN 4452 4427
MEd kNm 948 1000
c‐short MPa 12.33 12.67 19.2 limit value
s‐short MPa 67.02 74.53 ‐435 limit value
c‐Long MPa 11.15 11.42 STRESS
s‐Long MPa 84.30 93.14 LIMITS
 < ,limit OK OK O.K.

41
Des Rev.

0
Design of Trestle at A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
2.7. Verification of crackwidth at SLS

b)  Verification of crackwidth at critical section
Stress analysis at critical section
Load
unit
Comb. I II
NEd kN 3030 2830
BM 632 632
R.F 1 1
MEd 632 632
e 209 223
d/8 150 150
stage‐I

e>d/8 e>d/8
A A
fcr,max MPa 4.6 4.4
stage‐II

fcr,min MPa 0.17 0.02


Remarks Uncracked Uncracked

2.8) Check for Ductile Detailing
As per Clause 17.2 of IRC:112‐2011
Maximum Design Axial Force (from MIDAS Civil under Seismic Comb) NED = 4185 kN
C/S Area of Column Ac = 1.131 m2
Grade of Concrete fck = M 40
Eqn 17.1 of Normalized Axial Force  k = NED / Ac fck = 0.093
IRC:112‐2011  k‐lim = 0.064
Confining Reinforcement is Required
Diameter of Spiral = 12 mm
Maximum Spacing of Spirals in confinement zone = 125 mm
Spacing of Sprials SL = 50 mm OK
Eqn 17.4 of Volumetric Ratio of Transverse Reinforcement w = 4Asp / Dsp SL = 0.009
IRC:112‐2011
Eqn 17.2 of Confining Reinforcement Ratio wd = w fyd / fcd
IRC:112‐2011 wd = 0.211
Eqn 17.6&17.7 of Minimum Confining Reinforcement wd‐min = max[ 1.4w.req,0.18 ]
IRC:112‐2011 w.reqd = 0.37 (Ac/Acc)k + 0.13 (fyd/fcd) (L‐0.01)
Ac = 1130973.4 mm2
Acc = 865901.48 mm2
k = 0.093
L = 0.010
w.reqd = 0.180
Provided Confining Reinforcement is Sufficient

Eqn 17.3.2 of Extent of Confinement
IRC:112‐2011 Confining Reinforcement shall be provided at Trestle top for a length = 3600 mm

42
Des Rev.

0
Design of Trestle at P1 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
1.0. DESIGN DATA
1.1. Geometrical Data (All dimensions in millimeters)
Diameter of Trestle = 1200 mm

1.2. Materials Data and Stress Parameters
Trestle 
Unitweight of concrete (kN/m3) 25.0
Table 6.5 Grade of concrete M 40
 & 6.4.2 of Design compressive strength (MPa) f cd 18.00
IRC:112‐2011 Mean value of tensile strength (MPa) f ctm 3.00
Design value Modulus of Elasticity (GPa) E cd 33.0
Grade of reinforcement  Fe 500
Design yield strength of reinforcement(MPa) f yd 435
Clear cover 75

2.0. Design of Trestle 

2.1. Geometrical properties
Diameter of Trestle 1200 mm
Diameter of main bars = 45.25 mm MAIN BARS
Number of main bars = 22 Nos.  45 bars
Area of main steel As = 35379 mm2 22 Nos.
Maximum axial force on Trestle N Ed = 10170 kN
Minimum long. Steel area Max. of (0.1N Ed /f yd ,0.004A c ) = 4524 mm2
Moment of Inertia of Trestle section (I) = 0.102 m4
Young's Modulus of Concrete (E) = 32 GPa
Young's Modulus of Steel Reinforcement (Es) = 200 GPa

2.2. Verification of structural strength at ULS
Case I ‐ Maximum Axial Load 
Case II ‐ Minimum Axial Load 

Load Case I II
Axial force N Ed 10170 9551
Design BM M Ed 4336 3910
M Rd 6257 6335
M Ed <M Rd OK OK

2.4 Design for Shear
Cl 10.3.2 0f a) Section without Shear Reinforcement
IRC:112‐2011 Design Shear Force = 475 kN
Axial force = 10410 kN
cp = 3.600 MPa
Take effective depth d as 0.8 times the diameter of Trestle d = 960 mm
Effective Tension Area = 0.7 times gross concrete area bw d = 791681 mm2
K = 1+ (200/d)0.5 < 2.0 K = 1.456
1 = Asl / bw d < 0.02 1 = 0.020
min = 0.031 K1.5 fck0.5 min = 0.345 MPa
Rdc‐min = min + 0.15 cp Rdc‐min = 0.885 MPa
Rdc = 0.12 K (80 1 fck)0.33 + 0.15cp Rdc = 1.229 MPa
VRdc = 973 kN

43
Des Rev.

0
Design of Trestle at P1 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
Shear Reinforcement Not Required
2.5. Design of ties
Dia. of lateral steel is greater of 8mm and 45.25 / 4 = 12 mm
Pitch of lateral steel is lesser of 1200 OR 12x45.25 OR 150mm = 150 mm TIES
Provide 12 mm dia @ 150 mm c/c +  16 mm dia @ 1500mm c/c as lateral steel 12 @ 150

2.6. Verification of stress limits at SLS
Load Combinations considered for the check of stresses in Trestles under SLS are
I Live Load as Leading Load
II Temperature Load as Leading Load
III Wind Load as Leading Load

b) Calculation of creep coefficient(short term):
Cl.6.4.2.7 of Age of concrete in years at the moment considered t = 0.3 years
IRC:112‐2011 Age of concrete at loading in days t0 = 14 days
Table 14.1 of Relative humidity RH = 79 %
Cross sectional area of Trestle Ac = 1.13 m2
u = 3.77 m
IRC:112‐2011 Notional size, h 0  = 2A c /u = 600 mm
Table 6.5 of Mean compressive strength, f cm = 50 MPa
IRC:112‐2011  ( f cm )=16.8/sqrt(f cm ) = 2.4
 (t 0 )=1/(0.1+t 0 0.20 ) = 0.56
Coeff. allowing for concrete strength, 1  = (35/f cm ) 0.7 = 0.78
2  = (35/f cm ) 0.2 = 0.93
3  = (35/f cm ) 0.5 = 0.84
Factor  for RH  RH  = (1+(1‐(RH/100)  1 /(0.1h 0 0.33 ))   = 1.12
Notional creep coefficint  0  =   RH .  (f cm ).  (t 0 ) = 1.48
 H =1.5[1+(0.012RH) 18 ]h 0 +250  3  1500  3 = 1255
Factor for age at loading,  c (t,t 0 ) = ((t‐t 0 )/(  H +t‐t 0 )) 0.3 = 0.45
Creep coefficient  (t,t 0 ) =   0 .  c (t,t 0 ) = 0.67
Calculation of creep coefficient(long term):
Cl.6.4.2.7 of Age of concrete in years at the moment considered t = 100 years
IRC:112‐2011 Age of concrete at loading in days t0 = 14 days
Table 14.1 of Relative humidity RH = 79 %
Cross sectional area of Trestle Ac = 1.13 m2
u = 3.77 m

44
Des Rev.

0
Design of Trestle at P1 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
IRC:112‐2011 Notional size, h 0  = 2A c /u = 600 mm
Table 6.5 of Mean compressive strength, f cm = 50 MPa
IRC:112‐2011  ( f cm )=16.8/sqrt(f cm ) = 2.4
 (t 0 )=1/(0.1+t 0 0.20 ) = 0.56
Coeff. allowing for concrete strength, 1  = (35/f cm ) 0.7 = 0.78
2  = (35/f cm ) 0.2 = 0.93
3  = (35/f cm ) 0.5 = 0.84
Factor  for RH  RH  = (1+(1‐(RH/100)  1 /(0.1h 0 0.33 ))   = 1.12
Notional creep coefficint  0  =   RH .  (f cm ).  (t 0 ) = 1.48
 H =1.5[1+(0.012RH) 18 ]h 0 +250  3  1500  3 = 1255
Factor for age at loading,  c (t,t 0 ) = ((t‐t 0 )/(  H +t‐t 0 )) 0.3 = 0.99
Creep coefficient  (t,t 0 ) =   0 .  c (t,t 0 ) = 1.46
c) Section properties:
Diameter of Trestle d = 1200 mm
Cross sectional area of Trestle = 1.13 m2
Diameter of longitudinal bars = 45 mm
Spacing of bars = 140 mm
Area of reinforcements = 35379 mm2
Modulus of concrete,   E cm = 33 GPa
Effective modulus of concrete,  E c,eff  = E cm /(1+φ) = 19.80 GPa
Effective modulus of concrete,  E c,eff  = E cm /(1+φ) = 13.41 GPa
Effective modular ratio, (Short Term) =  E s /E c,eff = 10.100
Effective modular ratio, (Long Term) =  E s /E c,eff = 14.92
At uncracked stage:
Effective area A eff  = 0.785d 2  + (  e ‐1)(As+As') = 1623449 mm2
N.A. depth = 600 mm
Second M.I  about N.A., Iu = 2.268E+11 mm4
d) Verification of stresses at critical section

Comb unit I II Remarks


NEd kN 7211 6789
MEd kNm 3104 2796
c‐short MPa 18.41 17.07 19.2 limit value
s‐short MPa 180.31 160.53 ‐435 limit value
c‐Long MPa 14.58 13.55 STRESS
s‐Long MPa 193.10 172.28 LIMITS
 < ,limit OK OK O.K.

45
Des Rev.

0
Design of Trestle at P1 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
2.7. Verification of crackwidth at SLS

b) Verification of crackwidth at critical section
Stress analysis at critical section
Load
unit
Comb. I II
NEd kN 5584 5362
BM 2321 2321
R.F 1 1
MEd 2321 2321
e 416 433
d/8 150 150
stage‐I

e>d/8 e>d/8
A A
fcr,max MPa 9.6 9.4
stage‐II

fcr,min MPa ‐2.70 ‐2.84


Remarks Cracked Cracked
xu mm 771 757
Aeff mm2 1.E+06 1.E+06
stage‐III

e' mm 101 104


Ieff mm 1.E+11 1.E+11
fst MPa ‐80.40 ‐85.07
Kt 0.50 0.50
K1 0.80 0.80
K2 0.50 0.50
eff 14.92 14.92
As mm2 35379 35379
Aceff mm2 362869 379259
sc MPa 80.40 85.07
peff 0.10 0.09
sm ‐ cm 0.000 0.000
s mm 140 140
5 (c + /2) mm 548 548
Srmax mm 334 337
Wk mm 0.08 0.09
Wper mm 0.30 0.30

2.8) Check for Ductile Detailing
As per Clause 17.2 of IRC:112‐2011
Maximum Design Axial Force (from MIDAS Civil under Seismic Comb) NED = 7715 kN
C/S Area of Column Ac = 1.131 m2
Grade of Concrete fck = M 40
Eqn 17.1 of Normalized Axial Force  k = NED / Ac fck = 0.171
IRC:112‐2011  k‐lim = 0.064
Confining Reinforcement is Required

46
Des Rev.

0
Design of Trestle at P1 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
Diameter of Spiral = 12 mm
Maximum Spacing of Spirals in confinement zone = 207.6 mm
Spacing of Sprials SL = 50 mm OK
Eqn 17.4 of Volumetric Ratio of Transverse Reinforcement w = 4Asp / Dsp SL = 0.009
IRC:112‐2011
Eqn 17.2 of Confining Reinforcement Ratio wd = w fyd / fcd
IRC:112‐2011 wd = 0.211
Eqn 17.6&17.7 of Minimum Confining Reinforcement wd‐min = max[ 1.4w.req,0.18 ]
IRC:112‐2011 w.reqd = 0.37 (Ac/Acc)k + 0.13 (fyd/fcd) (L‐0.01)
Ac = 1130973.4 mm2
Acc = 865901.48 mm2
k = 0.171
L = 0.031
w.reqd = 0.180
Provided Confining Reinforcement is Sufficient

Eqn 17.3.2 of Extent of Confinement
IRC:112‐2011 Confining Reinforcement shall be provided at Trestle top for a length = 3600 mm

47
    DESIGN OF PILE CAP

48
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pilecap for Abutment A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950 Chk Date

Mar‐23

Ref. Calculations
1.0. MATERIAL DATA
1.1. Materials Data and Stress Parameters
Pile cap
Unitweight of concrete (kN/m3) 25.0
Table 6.5 Grade of concrete M 35
 & 6.4.2 of Design compressive strength (MPa) f cd 15.61
RC:112‐2011 Mean value of tensile strength (MPa) f ctm 2.80
Design value Modulus of Elasticity (GPa) E cd 32.0
Grade of reinforcement  Fe 500
Design yield strength of reinforcement(MPa) f yd 435
Clear cover 75

2.0. DESIGN OF PILE CAP

2.1. Strength Verification at ULS
2.1.1. Combination of Loads
The load combinations explored for the design of pile & pile cap are as follows:
A. Persistant Design Situation
1. Basic Combination
Annx. B of I. Live Load as Leading Load:
IRC:6‐2017 II. Wind Load as Leading Load
III. Thermal load as Leading Load
IV. Seismic Case

2.1.2. Design for Flexure
Length of Pile cap = 8.700 m
Width of Pile cap = 5.100 m
Depth of Pile Cap = 1.800 m
Cl 16.5.1.1 of As,min = MAX (0.26 f ctm /f yk  bd, 0.0013 bd)
IRC:112‐2011
ULS ‐  ULS ‐ 
Design para‐
unit Sagging  Hogging 
meters
Moment Moment
MEd kNm 2301 2686
b mm 5100 5100
d mm 1701 1701
K 0.004 0.005
Klim 0.169 0.169
K < K lim O.K. O.K.
z act mm 1692 1691
z min mm 1275 1275
z max mm 1615 1615
z mm 1615 1615
A s,req mm2 3274 3822
A s,min mm2 12627 12627
Bot. reinforcements

A s,req mm2 12627 12627


bar  mm 25 25
Spacing. mm 175 175
A s,prov mm2 14305 14305
 0.0016 0.0016
Remarks O.K. O.K.

49
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pilecap for Abutment A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950 Chk Date

Mar‐23

Ref. Calculations
2.1.2. Design for Shear
Cl 10.3.2 of a) Section without Shear Reinforcement
IRC:112‐2011 Design Shear Force = 1895 kN
effective depth d = 1701 mm
K = 1+ (200/d)0.5 < 2.0 K = 1.343
1 = Asl / bw d < 0.02 1 = 0.002
min = 0.031 K1.5 fck0.5 min = 0.285 MPa
Rdc‐min = min + 0.15 cp Rdc‐min = 0.285 MPa
Rdc = 0.12 K (80 1 fck)0.33 + 0.15cp Rdc = 0.267 MPa
VRdc = 2316 kN
Shear Reinforcement Not Required

2.2. Verification of stress limits at SLS
Annx. B of The load combinations explored the verification of stress limits in pile cap are
IRC:6‐2017 I. Live Load as Leading Load:
II. Wind Load as Leading Load
III. Thermal Load as Leading Load
2.2.1. Calculation of Creep Coefficient:
Cl.6.4.2.7 of Age of concrete in years at the moment considered t = 100 years
RC:112‐2011 Age of concrete at loading in days  t0 = 14 days
Table 14.1 of Relative humidity RH = 79 %
Cross sectional area of pile cap Ac = 9.18 m2
u = 13.80 m
RC:112‐2011 Notional size, h0 = 2Ac/u = 1330 mm
Table 6.5 of Mean compressive strength, f cm = 45 MPa
RC:112‐2011  ( f cm )=18.78/sqrt(f cm ) = 2.8
 (t 0 )=1/(0.1+t 0 0.20 ) = 0.56
Coefficients allowing for concrete strength, 1  = (43.75/f cm ) 0.7 = 0.98
2  = (43.75/f cm ) 0.2 = 0.99
3  = (43.75/f cm ) 0.5 = 0.99
Factor allowing for RH  RH  = (1+(1‐(RH/100)  1 /(0.1h 0 0.33 ))   = 1.19
Notional creep coefficint  0  =   RH .  (f cm ).  (t 0 ) = 1.85
 H =1.5[1+(0.012RH) 18 ]h 0 +250  3  1500  3 = 1479
Factor for conc. age at loading,  c (t,t 0 ) = ((t‐t 0 )/(  H +t‐t 0 )) 0.3 = 0.99
Creep coefficient  (t,t 0 ) =   0 .  c (t,t 0 ) = 1.826

2.2.2. Modified values of concrete modulus:
Modulus of concrete,   E cm = 32.0 GPa
Effective modulus of concrete,  E c,eff  = E cm /(1+φ) = 11.32 GPa
Effective modular ratio, @ end of design period =  E s /E c,eff = 17.66
Effective modular ratio, @ initial stage = 11.04

Thickness of Pile Cap h = 1800 mm
Width of effective pile cap b = 5100 mm
Cross sectional area of pile cap = 9.18 m2

50
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pilecap for Abutment A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950 Chk Date

Mar‐23

Ref. Calculations
Details of reinforcement in tensile side
Diameter of longitudinal bars = 25 mm
Area of tensile reinforcement As = 14305 mm2
Tensile Reinforcment ratio   = 0.0016
Clear cover dc = 75 mm
Effective depth d = 1701 mm
Details of reinforcement in compression side
Diameter of longitudinal bars = 25 mm
Area of tensile reinforcement As' = 14305 mm2
Compressive Reinforcment ratio  ' = 0.0016
Clear cover dc' = 75 mm
Effective depth d' = 100 mm
2.2.3. Properties of section:
@ End of Design Life
i) At uncracked stage
Effective area A eff  = bh + (  e ‐1)(As+As')
= 9656658.1 mm2
N.A. depth x u  =(1/A eff )[bh /2 + (  e ‐1)(Asd+As'd')] =
2
900 mm
Second M.I  about N.A.,
I u  =(b/3)[x u 3  + (h‐x u ) 3 ] + (  e ‐1)[A s (d‐x u ) 2 +A s '(x u ‐d') 2 ] = 2.784E+12 mm4
i) At cracked stage
Second M.I  about N.A.,
 c  bx c 3 /3+bd    (d‐x c ) 2 +( e ‐1) '(x c ‐d') 2 = 5.095E+11 mm4
     ' = 0.0535
     'd'/d = 0.0290
Depth of N.A. x c  =(sqrt    '  )d = 329 mm
Effective area A eff  = bx c  + (  e ‐1)(As+As') = 2154558.1 mm2
First M.I. of steel about N.A. S c  = A s (d – x c ) – A s ' (x c  – d') = 16336843 mm3
Cracking Moment Mcr = f ctm  I u  / (h‐x u ) = 8661 kNm
@ Initial Stage
i) At uncracked stage
Effective area A eff  = bh + (  e ‐1)(As+As')
= 9467253.8 mm2
N.A. depth x u  =(1/A eff )[bh /2 + (  e ‐1)(Asd+As'd')] =
2
900 mm
Second M.I  about N.A.,
I u  =(b/3)[x u 3  + (h‐x u ) 3 ] + (  e ‐1)[A s (d‐x u ) 2 +A s '(x u ‐d') 2 ] = 2.663E+12 mm4
i) At cracked stage
Second M.I  about N.A.,
 c  bx c 3 /3+bd    (d‐x c ) 2 +( e ‐1) '(x c ‐d') 2 = 3.386E+11 mm4
     ' = 0.0328
     'd'/d = 0.0181
Depth of N.A. x c  =(sqrt    '  )d = 273 mm
Effective area A eff  = bx c  + (  e ‐1)(As+As') = 1679553.8 mm2
First M.I. of steel about N.A. S c  = A s (d – x c ) – A s ' (x c  – d') = 17939055 mm3
Cracking Moment Mcr = f ctm  I u  / (h‐x u ) = 8284 kNm

51
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pilecap for Abutment A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950 Chk Date

Mar‐23

Ref. Calculations
Stress analysis of Pile Cap (Rare combination)
Sagging Mom Hogging Mom
Parameters
A B A B
MEd 1636 1979 kNm
Eceff 32.0 11.3 32.0 11.3 N/mm2
e 11.0 17.7 11.0 17.7
xu 900 900 900 900 mm
Uncracked

Iu 3.E+12 3.E+12 3.E+12 3.E+12 mm4


Mcr 8284 8284 8284 8284 kNm
MEd < Mcr YES YES YES YES
Cracked

xc 273 329 273 329 mm


Ic 3E+11 5E+11 3E+11 5E+11 mm4
c 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.6 N/mm2
c,limit
Stresses

16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 N/mm2


s 5.4 8.3 6.6 10.0 N/mm2
s,limit 400 400 400 400 N/mm2
SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE
Stage ‐ "A" ‐ Bridge Opening to Traffic
Stage ‐ "B" ‐ Bridge at end of design life

23. Verification of crackwidth at SLS
2.5.1. Verification of crackwidth at SLS ‐ along minor axis direction

Design Bending Moment MEd = 7523 kNm


Cracking Moment fctm Iu / (h ‐ xu) = 8661 kNm
Section is Uncracked

52
Des Rev.

Design of Pilecap for Pier P1 of Flyover at 0+950
0
Chk Date
Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
1.0. MATERIAL DATA
1.1. Materials Data and Stress Parameters
Pile cap
Unitweight of concrete (kN/m3) 25.0
Table 6.5 Grade of concrete M 35
 & 6.4.2 of Design compressive strength (MPa) f cd 15.61
RC:112‐2011 Mean value of tensile strength (MPa) f ctm 2.80
Design value Modulus of Elasticity (GPa) E cd 32.0
Grade of reinforcement  Fe 500
Design yield strength of reinforcement(MPa) f yd 435
Clear cover 75

2.0. DESIGN OF PILE CAP

2.1. Strength Verification at ULS
2.1.1. Combination of Loads
The load combinations explored for the design of pile & pile cap are as follows:
A. Persistant Design Situation
1. Basic Combination
Annx. B of I. Live Load as Leading Load:
IRC:6‐2017 II. Wind Load as Leading Load
III. Thermal load as Leading Load
IV. Seismic Case

2.1.2. Design for Flexure
Length of Pile cap = 8.700 m
Width of Pile cap = 5.100 m
Depth of Pile Cap = 1.800 m
Cl 16.5.1.1 of As,min = MAX (0.26 f ctm /f yk  bd, 0.0013 bd)
IRC:112‐2011
ULS ‐  ULS ‐ 
Design para‐
unit Sagging  Hogging 
meters
Moment Moment
MEd kNm 4208 4416
b mm 5100 5100
d mm 1701 1701
K 0.008 0.009
Klim 0.169 0.169
K < K lim O.K. O.K.
z act mm 1685 1684
z min mm 1275 1275
z max mm 1615 1615
z mm 1615 1615
A s,req mm2 5988 6284
A s,min mm2 12627 12627
Bot. reinforcements

A s,req mm2 12627 12627


bar  mm 25 25
Spacing. mm 175 175
A s,prov mm2 14305 14305
 0.0016 0.0016
Remarks O.K. O.K.

53
Des Rev.

Design of Pilecap for Pier P1 of Flyover at 0+950
0
Chk Date
Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
2.1.2. Design for Shear
Cl 10.3.2 of a) Section without Shear Reinforcement
IRC:112‐2011 Design Shear Force = 1895 kN
effective depth d = 1701 mm
K = 1+ (200/d)0.5 < 2.0 K = 1.343
1 = Asl / bw d < 0.02 1 = 0.002
min = 0.031 K1.5 fck0.5 min = 0.285 MPa
Rdc‐min = min + 0.15 cp Rdc‐min = 0.285 MPa
Rdc = 0.12 K (80 1 fck)0.33 + 0.15cp Rdc = 0.267 MPa
VRdc = 2316 kN
Shear Reinforcement Not Required

2.2. Verification of stress limits at SLS
Annx. B of The load combinations explored the verification of stress limits in pile cap are
IRC:6‐2017 I. Live Load as Leading Load:
II. Wind Load as Leading Load
III. Thermal Load as Leading Load
2.2.1. Calculation of Creep Coefficient:
Cl.6.4.2.7 of Age of concrete in years at the moment considered t = 100 years
RC:112‐2011 Age of concrete at loading in days  t0 = 14 days
Table 14.1 of Relative humidity RH = 79 %
Cross sectional area of pile cap Ac = 9.18 m2
u = 13.80 m
RC:112‐2011 Notional size, h0 = 2Ac/u = 1330 mm
Table 6.5 of Mean compressive strength, f cm = 45 MPa
RC:112‐2011  ( f cm )=18.78/sqrt(f cm ) = 2.8
 (t 0 )=1/(0.1+t 0 0.20 ) = 0.56
Coefficients allowing for concrete strength, 1  = (43.75/f cm ) 0.7 = 0.98
2  = (43.75/f cm ) 0.2 = 0.99
3  = (43.75/f cm ) 0.5 = 0.99
Factor allowing for RH  RH  = (1+(1‐(RH/100)  1 /(0.1h 0 0.33 ))   = 1.19
Notional creep coefficint  0  =   RH .  (f cm ).  (t 0 ) = 1.85
 H =1.5[1+(0.012RH) 18 ]h 0 +250  3  1500  3 = 1479
Factor for conc. age at loading,  c (t,t 0 ) = ((t‐t 0 )/(  H +t‐t 0 )) 0.3 = 0.99
Creep coefficient  (t,t 0 ) =   0 .  c (t,t 0 ) = 1.826

2.2.2. Modified values of concrete modulus:
Modulus of concrete,   E cm = 32.0 GPa
Effective modulus of concrete,  E c,eff  = E cm /(1+φ) = 11.32 GPa
Effective modular ratio, @ end of design period =  E s /E c,eff = 17.66
Effective modular ratio, @ initial stage = 11.04

Thickness of Pile Cap h = 1800 mm
Width of effective pile cap b = 5100 mm
Cross sectional area of pile cap = 9.18 m2

54
Des Rev.

Design of Pilecap for Pier P1 of Flyover at 0+950
0
Chk Date
Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
Details of reinforcement in tensile side
Diameter of longitudinal bars = 25 mm
Area of tensile reinforcement As = 14305 mm2
Tensile Reinforcment ratio   = 0.0016
Clear cover dc = 75 mm
Effective depth d = 1701 mm
Details of reinforcement in compression side
Diameter of longitudinal bars = 25 mm
Area of tensile reinforcement As' = 14305 mm2
Compressive Reinforcment ratio  ' = 0.0016
Clear cover dc' = 75 mm
Effective depth d' = 100 mm
2.2.3. Properties of section:
@ End of Design Life
i) At uncracked stage
Effective area A eff  = bh + (  e ‐1)(As+As')
= 9656658.1 mm2
N.A. depth x u  =(1/A eff )[bh /2 + (  e ‐1)(Asd+As'd')] =
2
900 mm
Second M.I  about N.A.,
I u  =(b/3)[x u 3  + (h‐x u ) 3 ] + (  e ‐1)[A s (d‐x u ) 2 +A s '(x u ‐d') 2 ] = 2.784E+12 mm4
i) At cracked stage
Second M.I  about N.A.,
 c  bx c 3 /3+bd    (d‐x c ) 2 +( e ‐1) '(x c ‐d') 2 = 5.095E+11 mm4
     ' = 0.0535
     'd'/d = 0.0290
Depth of N.A. x c  =(sqrt    '  )d = 329 mm
Effective area A eff  = bx c  + (  e ‐1)(As+As') = 2154558.1 mm2
First M.I. of steel about N.A. S c  = A s (d – x c ) – A s ' (x c  – d') = 16336843 mm3
Cracking Moment Mcr = f ctm  I u  / (h‐x u ) = 8661 kNm
@ Initial Stage
i) At uncracked stage
Effective area A eff  = bh + (  e ‐1)(As+As') = 9467253.8 mm2
N.A. depth x u  =(1/A eff )[bh 2 /2 + (  e ‐1)(Asd+As'd')] = 900 mm
Second M.I  about N.A.,
I u  =(b/3)[x u 3  + (h‐x u ) 3 ] + (  e ‐1)[A s (d‐x u ) 2 +A s '(x u ‐d') 2 ] = 2.663E+12 mm4
i) At cracked stage
Second M.I  about N.A.,
 c  bx c 3 /3+bd    (d‐x c ) 2 +( e ‐1) '(x c ‐d') 2 = 3.386E+11 mm4
     ' = 0.0328
     'd'/d = 0.0181
Depth of N.A. x c  =(sqrt    '  )d = 273 mm
Effective area A eff  = bx c  + (  e ‐1)(As+As') = 1679553.8 mm2
First M.I. of steel about N.A. S c  = A s (d – x c ) – A s ' (x c  – d') = 17939055 mm3
Cracking Moment Mcr = f ctm  I u  / (h‐x u ) = 8284 kNm

55
Des Rev.

Design of Pilecap for Pier P1 of Flyover at 0+950
0
Chk Date
Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
Stress analysis of Pile Cap (Rare combination)
Sagging Mom Hogging Mom
Parameters
A B A B
MEd 2827 3165 kNm
Eceff 32.0 11.3 32.0 11.3 N/mm2
e 11.0 17.7 11.0 17.7
xu 900 900 900 900 mm
Uncracked

Iu 3.E+12 3.E+12 3.E+12 3.E+12 mm4


Mcr 8284 8284 8284 8284 kNm
MEd < Mcr YES YES YES YES
Cracked

xc 273 329 273 329 mm


Ic 3E+11 5E+11 3E+11 5E+11 mm4
c 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.0 N/mm2
c,limit
Stresses

16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 N/mm2


s 9.4 14.4 10.5 16.1 N/mm2
s,limit 400 400 400 400 N/mm2
SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE
Stage ‐ "A" ‐ Bridge Opening to Traffic
Stage ‐ "B" ‐ Bridge at end of design life

23. Verification of crackwidth at SLS
2.5.1. Verification of crackwidth at SLS ‐ along minor axis direction

Design Bending Moment MEd = 7523 kNm


Cracking Moment fctm Iu / (h ‐ xu) = 8661 kNm
Section is Uncracked

56
    DESIGN OF PILE

57
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pile at A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
1.0. DESIGN DATA
1.1. Geometrical Data (All dimensions in millimeters)
Diameter of Pile = 1200 mm

1.2. Geotechnical Data
Safe Vertical capacity of pile = 3200 kN
1.3. Materials Data and Stress Parameters
Pile 
Unitweight of concrete (kN/m3) 25.0
Table 6.5 Grade of concrete M 35
 & 6.4.2 of Design compressive strength (MPa) f cd 15.75
IRC:112‐2011 Mean value of tensile strength (MPa) f ctm 2.80
Design value Modulus of Elasticity (GPa) E cd 32.0
Grade of reinforcement  Fe 500
Design yield strength of reinforcement(MPa) f yd 435
Clear cover 75

2.0. Design of Pile 

2.1. Geometrical properties
Diameter of pile 1200 mm
Diameter of main bars = 20 mm MAIN BARS
Number of main bars = 20 Nos.  20 bars
Area of main steel As = 6283 mm2 20 Nos.
Maximum axial force on pile N Ed = 2502 kN
Minimum long. Steel area Max. of (0.1N Ed /f yd ,0.004A c ) = 4524 mm2
Moment of Inertia of Pile section (I) = 0.102 m4
Young's Modulus of Concrete (E) = 32 GPa
Young's Modulus of Steel Reinforcement (Es) = 200 GPa

2.2. Verification of structural strength at ULS
Case I ‐ Maximum Axial Load 
Case II ‐ Minimum Axial Load 

Load Case I II
Axial force N Ed 2502 2299
Design BM M Ed 371 354
M Rd 2144 2095
M Ed <M Rd OK OK

2.4 Design for Shear
Cl 10.3.2 0f a) Section without Shear Reinforcement
IRC:112‐2011 Design Shear Force = 100 kN
Axial force = 4395 kN
cp = 3.150 MPa
Take effective depth d as 0.8 times the diameter of pile d = 960 mm
Effective Tension Area = 0.7 times gross concrete area bw d = 791681 mm2
K = 1+ (200/d)0.5 < 2.0 K = 1.456
1 = Asl / bw d < 0.02 1 = 0.008
min = 0.031 K1.5 fck0.5 min = 0.322 MPa
Rdc‐min = min + 0.15 cp Rdc‐min = 0.795 MPa
Rdc = 0.12 K (80 1 fck)0.33 + 0.15cp Rdc = 0.959 MPa
VRdc = 759 kN

58
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pile at A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
Shear Reinforcement Not Required
2.5. Design of ties
Dia. of lateral steel is greater of 8mm and 20 / 4 = 10 mm
Pitch of lateral steel is lesser of 1200 OR 12x20 OR 150mm = 150 mm TIES
Provide 10 mm dia @ 150 mm c/c +  16 mm dia @ 1500mm c/c as lateral steel 10 @ 150

2.6. Verification of stress limits at SLS
Load Combinations considered for the check of stresses in piles under SLS are
I Live Load as Leading Load
II Temperature Load as Leading Load
III Wind Load as Leading Load

b) Calculation of creep coefficient(short term):
Cl.6.4.2.7 of Age of concrete in years at the moment considered t = 0.3 years
IRC:112‐2011 Age of concrete at loading in days t0 = 14 days
Table 14.1 of Relative humidity RH = 79 %
Cross sectional area of pile Ac = 1.13 m2
u = 3.77 m
IRC:112‐2011 Notional size, h 0  = 2A c /u = 600 mm
Table 6.5 of Mean compressive strength, f cm = 45 MPa
IRC:112‐2011  ( f cm )=16.8/sqrt(f cm ) = 2.5
 (t 0 )=1/(0.1+t 0 0.20 ) = 0.56
Coeff. allowing for concrete strength, 1  = (35/f cm ) 0.7 = 0.84
2  = (35/f cm ) 0.2 = 0.95
3  = (35/f cm ) 0.5 = 0.88
Factor  for RH  RH  = (1+(1‐(RH/100)  1 /(0.1h 0 0.33 ))   = 1.15
Notional creep coefficint  0  =   RH .  (f cm ).  (t 0 ) = 1.61
 H =1.5[1+(0.012RH) 18 ]h 0 +250  3  1500  3 = 1323
Factor for age at loading,  c (t,t 0 ) = ((t‐t 0 )/(  H +t‐t 0 )) 0.3 = 0.45
Creep coefficient  (t,t 0 ) =   0 .  c (t,t 0 ) = 0.72
Calculation of creep coefficient(long term):
Cl.6.4.2.7 of Age of concrete in years at the moment considered t = 100 years
IRC:112‐2011 Age of concrete at loading in days t0 = 14 days
Table 14.1 of Relative humidity RH = 79 %
Cross sectional area of pile Ac = 1.13 m2
u = 3.77 m

59
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pile at A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
IRC:112‐2011 Notional size, h 0  = 2A c /u = 600 mm
Table 6.5 of Mean compressive strength, f cm = 45 MPa
IRC:112‐2011  ( f cm )=16.8/sqrt(f cm ) = 2.5
 (t 0 )=1/(0.1+t 0 0.20 ) = 0.56
Coeff. allowing for concrete strength, 1  = (35/f cm ) 0.7 = 0.84
2  = (35/f cm ) 0.2 = 0.95
3  = (35/f cm ) 0.5 = 0.88
Factor  for RH  RH  = (1+(1‐(RH/100)  1 /(0.1h 0 0.33 ))   = 1.15
Notional creep coefficint  0  =   RH .  (f cm ).  (t 0 ) = 1.61
 H =1.5[1+(0.012RH) 18 ]h 0 +250  3  1500  3 = 1323
Factor for age at loading,  c (t,t 0 ) = ((t‐t 0 )/(  H +t‐t 0 )) 0.3 = 0.99
Creep coefficient  (t,t 0 ) =   0 .  c (t,t 0 ) = 1.59
c) Section properties:
Diameter of Pile d = 1200 mm
Cross sectional area of Pile = 1.13 m2
Diameter of longitudinal bars = 20 mm
Spacing of bars = 159 mm
Area of reinforcements = 6283 mm2
Modulus of concrete,   E cm = 32 GPa
Effective modulus of concrete,  E c,eff  = E cm /(1+φ) = 18.64 GPa
Effective modulus of concrete,  E c,eff  = E cm /(1+φ) = 12.34 GPa
Effective modular ratio, (Short Term) =  E s /E c,eff = 10.730
Effective modular ratio, (Long Term) =  E s /E c,eff = 16.20
At uncracked stage:
Effective area A eff  = 0.785d 2  + (  e ‐1)(As+As') = 1226475 mm2
N.A. depth = 600 mm
Second M.I  about N.A., Iu = 1.651E+11 mm4
d) Verification of stresses at critical section

Comb unit I II Remarks


NEd kN 3182 2334
MEd kNm 0 146
c‐short MPa 2.81 2.92 16.8 limit value
s‐short MPa 25.41 26.41 ‐435 limit value
c‐Long MPa 2.81 2.92 STRESS
s‐Long MPa 38.36 39.87 LIMITS
 < ,limit OK OK O.K.

60
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pile at A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
2.7. Verification of crackwidth at SLS

b) Verification of crackwidth at critical section
Stress analysis at critical section
Load
unit
Comb. I II
NEd kN 2595 1300
BM 100 100
R.F 1 1
MEd 100 100
e 39 77
d/8 150 150
stage‐I

e<d/8 e<d/8
A A
fcr,max MPa 2.5 1.4
stage‐II

fcr,min MPa 1.75 0.70


Remarks Uncracked Uncracked

2.8) Check for Ductile Detailing
As per Clause 17.2 of IRC:112‐2011
Maximum Design Axial Force (from MIDAS Civil under Seismic Comb) NED = 3485 kN
C/S Area of Column Ac = 1.131 m2
Grade of Concrete fck = M 35
Eqn 17.1 of Normalized Axial Force  k = NED / Ac fck = 0.088
IRC:112‐2011  k‐lim = 0.064
Confining Reinforcement is Required
Diameter of Spiral = 12 mm
Maximum Spacing of Spirals in confinement zone = 100 mm
Spacing of Sprials SL = 65 mm OK
Eqn 17.4 of Volumetric Ratio of Transverse Reinforcement w = 4Asp / Dsp SL = 0.007
IRC:112‐2011
Eqn 17.2 of Confining Reinforcement Ratio wd = w fyd / fcd
IRC:112‐2011 wd = 0.185
Eqn 17.6&17.7 of Minimum Confining Reinforcement wd‐min = max[ 1.4w.req,0.18 ]
IRC:112‐2011 w.reqd = 0.37 (Ac/Acc)k + 0.13 (fyd/fcd) (L‐0.01)
Ac = 1130973.4 mm2
Acc = 865901.48 mm2
k = 0.088
L = 0.006
w.reqd = 0.180
Provided Confining Reinforcement is Sufficient

Eqn 17.3.2 of Extent of Confinement
IRC:112‐2011 Confining Reinforcement shall be provided at pile top for a length = 3600 mm

2.9. Check for Pile Capacity
CL706.1.1 of Load Combination Considered are
IRC:78‐2014 IA 1.0(DL)+1.0(SIDL)+1.0(LL)+1.0(W/C)+1.0(EP)
IIA 1.0(DL)+1.0(SIDL)+1.0(LL)+1.0(W/C)+1.0(EP)+1.0(W)
IIB 1.0(DL)+1.0(SIDL)+0.2(LL)+1.0(W/C)+1.0(EP)+1.0(W)+1.0(EQ)
IIIA 1.0(DL)+1.0(SIDL)+1.0(W/C)+1.0(EP)+1.0(W)
IIIB 1.0(DL)+1.0(SIDL)+1.0(W/C)+1.0(EP)+1.0(EQ)

61
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pile at A1 A2 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
Load on critical pile
Load Vertical Load(kN) Permissible 
Remarks
comb. Max. Min. Load
IA 3130 1562 3200 SAFE
IIA 3120 1590 4256 SAFE
IIB 3084 1553 4800 SAFE
IIIA 2756 1326 4256 SAFE
IIIB 2578 1300 4800 SAFE

Axial force on pile (SLS) = 3130 kN
Total force at tip of pile = 3130 kN
Pile Capacity = 3200 kN
Permissible pile capacity in Wind load leading combination 4256 kN PILE CAPACITY
O.K
Maximum tip pressure = 2.8 MPa TIP PRESSURE
which is less than permissible value = 5.0 MPa O.K

62
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pile at P1 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
1.0. DESIGN DATA
1.1. Geometrical Data (All dimensions in millimeters)
Diameter of Pile = 1200 mm

1.2. Geotechnical Data
Safe Vertical capacity of pile = 4100 kN
1.3. Materials Data and Stress Parameters
Pile 
Unitweight of concrete (kN/m3) 25.0
Table 6.5 Grade of concrete M 35
 & 6.4.2 of Design compressive strength (MPa) f cd 15.75
IRC:112‐2011 Mean value of tensile strength (MPa) f ctm 2.80
Design value Modulus of Elasticity (GPa) E cd 32.0
Grade of reinforcement  Fe 500
Design yield strength of reinforcement(MPa) f yd 435
Clear cover 75

2.0. Design of Pile 

2.1. Geometrical properties
Diameter of pile 1200 mm
Diameter of main bars = 20 mm MAIN BARS
Number of main bars = 20 Nos.  20 bars
Area of main steel As = 6283 mm2 20 Nos.
Maximum axial force on pile N Ed = 4621 kN
Minimum long. Steel area Max. of (0.1N Ed /f yd ,0.004A c ) = 4524 mm2
Moment of Inertia of Pile section (I) = 0.102 m4
Young's Modulus of Concrete (E) = 32 GPa
Young's Modulus of Steel Reinforcement (Es) = 200 GPa

2.2. Verification of structural strength at ULS
Case I ‐ Maximum Axial Load 
Case II ‐ Minimum Axial Load 

Load Case I II
Axial force N Ed 4621 4123
Design BM M Ed 626 641
M Rd 2558 2478
M Ed <M Rd OK OK

63
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pile at P1 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
2.4 Design for Shear
Cl 10.3.2 0f a) Section without Shear Reinforcement
IRC:112‐2011 Design Shear Force = 175 kN
Axial force = 5800 kN
cp = 3.150 MPa
Take effective depth d as 0.8 times the diameter of pile d = 960 mm
Effective Tension Area = 0.7 times gross concrete area bw d = 791681 mm2
K = 1+ (200/d)0.5 < 2.0 K = 1.456
1 = Asl / bw d < 0.02 1 = 0.008
min = 0.031 K1.5 fck0.5 min = 0.322 MPa
Rdc‐min = min + 0.15 cp Rdc‐min = 0.795 MPa
Rdc = 0.12 K (80 1 fck)0.33 + 0.15cp Rdc = 0.959 MPa
VRdc = 759 kN
Shear Reinforcement Not Required
2.5. Design of ties
Dia. of lateral steel is greater of 8mm and 20 / 4 = 10 mm
Pitch of lateral steel is lesser of 1200 OR 12x20 OR 150mm = 150 mm TIES
Provide 10 mm dia @ 150 mm c/c +  16 mm dia @ 1500mm c/c as lateral steel 10 @ 150

2.6. Verification of stress limits at SLS
Load Combinations considered for the check of stresses in piles under SLS are
I Live Load as Leading Load
II Temperature Load as Leading Load
III Wind Load as Leading Load

b) Calculation of creep coefficient(short term):
Cl.6.4.2.7 of Age of concrete in years at the moment considered t = 0.3 years
IRC:112‐2011 Age of concrete at loading in days t0 = 14 days
Table 14.1 of Relative humidity RH = 79 %
Cross sectional area of pile Ac = 1.13 m2
u = 3.77 m
IRC:112‐2011 Notional size, h 0  = 2A c /u = 600 mm
Table 6.5 of Mean compressive strength, f cm = 45 MPa
IRC:112‐2011  ( f cm )=16.8/sqrt(f cm ) = 2.5
 (t 0 )=1/(0.1+t 0 0.20 ) = 0.56
Coeff. allowing for concrete strength, 1  = (35/f cm ) 0.7 = 0.84
2  = (35/f cm ) 0.2 = 0.95
3  = (35/f cm ) 0.5 = 0.88
Factor  for RH  RH  = (1+(1‐(RH/100)  1 /(0.1h 0 0.33 ))   = 1.15
Notional creep coefficint  0  =   RH .  (f cm ).  (t 0 ) = 1.61
 H =1.5[1+(0.012RH) 18 ]h 0 +250  3  1500  3 = 1323
Factor for age at loading,  c (t,t 0 ) = ((t‐t 0 )/(  H +t‐t 0 )) 0.3 = 0.45
Creep coefficient  (t,t 0 ) =   0 .  c (t,t 0 ) = 0.72
Calculation of creep coefficient(long term):
Cl.6.4.2.7 of Age of concrete in years at the moment considered t = 100 years
IRC:112‐2011 Age of concrete at loading in days t0 = 14 days
Table 14.1 of Relative humidity RH = 79 %
Cross sectional area of pile Ac = 1.13 m2
u = 3.77 m

64
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pile at P1 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
IRC:112‐2011 Notional size, h 0  = 2A c /u = 600 mm
Table 6.5 of Mean compressive strength, f cm = 45 MPa
IRC:112‐2011  ( f cm )=16.8/sqrt(f cm ) = 2.5
 (t 0 )=1/(0.1+t 0 0.20 ) = 0.56
Coeff. allowing for concrete strength, 1  = (35/f cm ) 0.7 = 0.84
2  = (35/f cm ) 0.2 = 0.95
3  = (35/f cm ) 0.5 = 0.88
Factor  for RH  RH  = (1+(1‐(RH/100)  1 /(0.1h 0 0.33 ))   = 1.15
Notional creep coefficint  0  =   RH .  (f cm ).  (t 0 ) = 1.61
 H =1.5[1+(0.012RH) 18 ]h 0 +250  3  1500  3 = 1323
Factor for age at loading,  c (t,t 0 ) = ((t‐t 0 )/(  H +t‐t 0 )) 0.3 = 0.99
Creep coefficient  (t,t 0 ) =   0 .  c (t,t 0 ) = 1.59
c) Section properties:
Diameter of Pile d = 1200 mm
Cross sectional area of Pile = 1.13 m2
Diameter of longitudinal bars = 20 mm
Spacing of bars = 159 mm
Area of reinforcements = 6283 mm2
Modulus of concrete,   E cm = 32 GPa
Effective modulus of concrete,  E c,eff  = E cm /(1+φ) = 18.64 GPa
Effective modulus of concrete,  E c,eff  = E cm /(1+φ) = 12.34 GPa
Effective modular ratio, (Short Term) =  E s /E c,eff = 10.730
Effective modular ratio, (Long Term) =  E s /E c,eff = 16.20
At uncracked stage:
Effective area A eff  = 0.785d 2  + (  e ‐1)(As+As') = 1226475 mm2
N.A. depth = 600 mm
Second M.I  about N.A., Iu = 1.651E+11 mm4
d) Verification of stresses at critical section

Comb unit I II Remarks


NEd kN 3260 3245
MEd kNm 221 211
c‐short MPa 4.19 4.11 16.8 limit value
s‐short MPa 37.80 37.14 ‐435 limit value
c‐Long MPa 4.19 4.11 STRESS
s‐Long MPa 57.07 56.08 LIMITS
 < ,limit OK OK O.K.

65
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pile at P1 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
2.7. Verification of crackwidth at SLS

b) Verification of crackwidth at critical section
Stress analysis at critical section
Load
unit
Comb. I II
NEd kN 3404 2465
BM 100 100
R.F 1 1
MEd 100 100
e 29 41
d/8 150 150
stage‐I

e<d/8 e<d/8
A A
fcr,max MPa 3.1 2.4
stage‐II

fcr,min MPa 2.41 1.65


Remarks Uncracked Uncracked

2.8) Check for Ductile Detailing
As per Clause 17.2 of IRC:112‐2011
Maximum Design Axial Force (from MIDAS Civil under Seismic Comb) NED = 4624 kN
C/S Area of Column Ac = 1.131 m2
Grade of Concrete fck = M 35
Eqn 17.1 of Normalized Axial Force  k = NED / Ac fck = 0.117
IRC:112‐2011  k‐lim = 0.064
Confining Reinforcement is Required
Diameter of Spiral = 12 mm
Maximum Spacing of Spirals in confinement zone = 100 mm
Spacing of Sprials SL = 65 mm OK
Eqn 17.4 of Volumetric Ratio of Transverse Reinforcement w = 4Asp / Dsp SL = 0.007
IRC:112‐2011
Eqn 17.2 of Confining Reinforcement Ratio wd = w fyd / fcd
IRC:112‐2011 wd = 0.185
Eqn 17.6&17.7 of Minimum Confining Reinforcement wd‐min = max[ 1.4w.req,0.18 ]
IRC:112‐2011 w.reqd = 0.37 (Ac/Acc)k + 0.13 (fyd/fcd) (L‐0.01)
Ac = 1130973.4 mm2
Acc = 865901.48 mm2
k = 0.117
L = 0.006
w.reqd = 0.180
Provided Confining Reinforcement is Sufficient

Eqn 17.3.2 of Extent of Confinement
IRC:112‐2011 Confining Reinforcement shall be provided at pile top for a length = 3600 mm

2.9. Check for Pile Capacity
CL706.1.1 of Load Combination Considered are
IRC:78‐2014 IA 1.0(DL)+1.0(SIDL)+1.0(LL)+1.0(W/C)+1.0(EP)
IIA 1.0(DL)+1.0(SIDL)+1.0(LL)+1.0(W/C)+1.0(EP)+1.0(W)
IIB 1.0(DL)+1.0(SIDL)+0.2(LL)+1.0(W/C)+1.0(EP)+1.0(W)+1.0(EQ)
IIIA 1.0(DL)+1.0(SIDL)+1.0(W/C)+1.0(EP)+1.0(W)
IIIB 1.0(DL)+1.0(SIDL)+1.0(W/C)+1.0(EP)+1.0(EQ)

66
Des Rev.

0
Design of Pile at P1 of Flyover at 0+950
Chk Date

Mar‐23
Ref. Calculations
Load on critical pile
Load Vertical Load(kN) Permissible 
Remarks
comb. Max. Min. Load
IA 4065 2863 4100 SAFE
IIA 4214 2934 5453 SAFE
IIB 4143 2865 6150 SAFE
IIIA 3838 2574 5453 SAFE
IIIB 3388 2540 6150 SAFE

Axial force on pile (SLS) = 4065 kN
Total force at tip of pile = 4065 kN
Pile Capacity = 4100 kN
Permissible pile capacity in Wind load leading combination 5453 kN PILE CAPACITY
O.K
Maximum tip pressure = 3.6 MPa TIP PRESSURE
which is less than permissible value = 5.0 MPa O.K

67
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF  DIRT WALL

 Design BM 
Grade of Concrete = M35
Thickness of dirt wall = 300.0 mm
height of Girder and  desck slab  = 2130.0 mm
Height of pedestal and bearing (Max) = 350.0 mm
Total Depth of Dirt wall = 2480.0 mm
Single axle load of 400 kN Boggie Load on dirt wall = 200.0 kN 
Dispersion length of axle load at bottom of dirt wall = 5.270 m
UDL due to axle load at bottom of dirt wall =(200/5.27) = 38.0 kNm
Impact factor = 0.5
UDL due to breaking of axle load at bottom of dirt wall (20%) = 7.60 kNm
Vertical distance of braeking force from bottom of dirt wall = 3.330 m
BM at bottom of dirt wall due to breaking load (Qa2) =7.6x3.33 = 25.31 kNm
Reinforcements for  Vertical Slab of dirt wall 
Design bending moment 38.0 kNm
Effective depth provided = 254 mm
K = M Ed /(f ck .bd 2 ) 0.020
K lim 0.168
Liver arm, z = (d/2).(1+sqrt(1‐4.44K)) 248 mm
z min  = 0.75d 191 mm
z max  = 0.95d 241 mm
z  241
Area of steel required = 362 mm2
Min. steel required A stmin  = 0.26*f ctm .b.d/f yk , > 0.0013bd = 380 mm2
Provide # 12 @ 100 at both faces of dirt wall = 1130 mm2

3.1.6.Transverse reinforcemnt as distributors
Transverse reinforcement shall be 20% of main reinforcement
=0.2x1130 = 226 mm2
Provide # 10 @ 150 at both faces = 523 mm2

#12@100c/c
#10@150c/c

68

You might also like