Guidelines for Group work Participation Rubric
(Including (1) summaries of the reading; (2) Group presentation; (3) Group portfolio; and (4) In-class discussion)
Criteria
Distinguished (20%)
Workload Did a full share of the work
(20%) — or more; knows what
needs to be done and does
it; volunteers to help others.
Getting Organized Took the initiative
(20%) proposing meeting times
and getting group
organized.
Participation in - Provided many good ideas
discussions and for the group’s work;
providing feedback inspired others; clearly
(20%) communicated desires,
ideas, personal needs, and
feelings.
- Habitually provides
dignified, clear, and
respectful feedback.
Meeting Deadlines Completed assigned
(20%) work ahead of time.
Level of Participation
Proficient (15%) Basic (10%) Unacceptable (5%)
Did an equal share of Did almost as much Did less work than
the work; does work work as others; seldom others; doesn’t get
when asked; works asks for help. caught up after absence;
hard most of the doesn’t ask for help.
time.
Worked agreeably Could be coaxed Did not meet partner(s)
with partner(s) into meeting with at agreed times and
concerning times other places.
and places to partner(s).
meet.
- Participated in - Listened mainly; - Seemed bored with
discussions; shared on some occasions, conversations about the
feelings and thoughts. made suggestions. unit; rarely spoke up,
- Gave feedback that and ideas were off the
did not offend. - Provided some mark. - Was openly
feedback; sometimes rude when giving
hurt feelings of others feedback.
with feedback or made
irrelevant comments.
Completed Needed some Needed much
assigned work on reminding; work was reminding; work was
time. late but it didn’t impact late and it did impact
grade. quality of work or
grade.
 Showing up for Showed up for meetings Showed up for Showed up late, but it No show or extremely
Meetings (20%) punctually, sometimes meetings on time. wasn’t a big problem late; feeble or no excuse
ahead of time. for completing work. offered.

(Adapted from Making the Grade: The Role of Assessment in Authentic Learning by Marilyn M. Lombardi, http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3019.pdf)
GROUP PROJECT PARTICIPATION FORM
Name of group member: Bùi Nguyễn Anh Hào
Total score: 90%
Criteria Level of Participation

Distinguished (20%) Proficient (15%) Basic (10%) Unacceptable (5%)

Workload 20
(20%)

Getting Organized 15
(20%)

Participation in 15
discussions and
providing feedback
(20%)

Meeting Deadlines 20
(20%)

Showing up for 20
Meetings (20%)
 Name of group member: Lê Thành Đạt
Total score: 90%
Criteria Level of Participation

Distinguished (20%) Proficient (15%) Basic (10%) Unacceptable (5%)

Workload 20
(20%)

Getting Organized 15
(20%)

Participation in 15
discussions and
providing feedback
(20%)

Meeting Deadlines 20
(20%)

Showing up for 20
Meetings (20%)

Name of group member: Nguyễn Mỹ Linh

Total score: 90%
Criteria Level of Participation
 Distinguished (20%) Proficient (15%) Basic (10%) Unacceptable (5%)

Workload 20
(20%)

Getting Organized 15
(20%)

Participation in 15
discussions and
providing feedback
(20%)

Meeting Deadlines 20
(20%)

Showing up for 20
Meetings (20%)

Name of group member: Trương Trường An

Total score: 90%
Criteria Level of Participation

Distinguished (20%) Proficient (15%) Basic (10%) Unacceptable (5%)

Workload 20
(20%)
Getting Organized 15
(20%)

Participation in 15
discussions and
providing feedback
(20%)

Meeting Deadlines 20
(20%)

Showing up for 20
Meetings (20%)