Saint Louis University

SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE

Department of Chemical and Mining Engineering

LABORATORY REPORT EVALUATION SHEET

Laboratory Course: _______________________________
Schedule:______________________
Experiment Number: ____
Experiment Title: __________________________________________________________
Group Number: ____ Date Performed: ___________ Date Submitted: ___________
Group Members (in alphabetical order):
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________

Contents Total Remarks Score

Points
Chapter 1: Introduction
Objective 10
Theoretical Background
Industrial Application
IV. Chapter 2: Design and
Methodology
Apparatus 15
Reagents
Experimental Set-up
Procedure
Chapter 3: Result and 20
Discussion
Chapter 4: Conclusion and 10
Recommendation
References (APA format) 5
Appendices
Definition of Terms 15
Computations
Answers to questions
Format and Neatness 5
TOTAL POINTS 80

Evaluated by: ___________________________________ Date: _____________________

 RUBRIC FOR LABORATORY REPORT
Part Maximum Description Deductions
Points
Chapter 1: Parts
Introduction 1 Objective (at least 1)
7 Theoretical Background (minimum
of 2 pages with citation not more
within 10 years to date; at least 5
citations)
2 Industrial Application (minimum of
2 with citation)

Format unfollowed -2
Incomplete (theoretical -2 per
background, objective, deficiency
significance)
Insignificant -2
Grammar -2
Missing citation -2
Citation not within 10 years to -2
date
Citation less than 5 -2
Chapter 2: Design Parts
and Methodology Apparatus (List and how it was
5 used)
Reagents (Summary of MSDS)
5 Experimental Set-up (Draw and
Label)
5 Procedure
Format unfollowed -2
Incomplete (list of apparatus and -2 per
reagents, set-up, Procedure, deficiency
process design flowchart)
Grammar -2
Not past tense -2
Didn’t use 3rd person point of view -2
Missing citation -2
Chapter 3: Result 20 Raw data’s, main data
and Discussion For every table constructed there
should be an interpretation and a
supporting work to justify your
interpretation
Format unfollowed -2
Grammar -2
Incomplete -2 per
deficiency
 No interpretation -10
No corroboration -10
Missing citation -2
Citation within 10 years to date -2
Not past tense -2
Didn’t use 3rd person point of view -2
Chapter 4: 10 Parts
Conclusion and Conclusion (addresses the
Recommendation objective)
Recommendation (improvement
of the experiment)

No conclusion -5
No recommendation -5
Grammar -2
Didn’t use 3rd person point of view -2
References (APA 5 Format unfollowed -2
format) Incomplete -2
Not alphabetical -2
VIII. Appendices Format unfollowed -2
a. Definition of 5 Incomplete -2 per
Terms (how it was deficiency
utilized in the Incorrect computations and -5
experiment) answer to problems
b. Computations 5
c. Problems 5
Format and 5 Format unfollowed -2
Neatness Unorganized -2
Messy work -2